Still Report #659 - Islam's 2016 European Offensive

• Report rights infringement
• published: 27 Feb 2016
• views: 938

In November 2015, a very interesting article was published by former Navy Seal, Matthew Bracken. His title was “Tet, Take Two: Islam’s 2016 European Offensive.” Since the number of people who will know what the Tet offensive was is dwindling rapidly, I’ve cut it down to “Islam’s 2016 European Offensive”. But make no mistake, the following article is all about Braken’s take on the world – with a few added touches from your humble reporter. Braken’s piece is probably THE most important 9100-word article I read in 2015; however, that’s just it – for those of us who are borderline illiterate, it’s just too long. I’ve held off reporting on it, because of the crush of smaller stories on the invasion of Europe and a slower, quieter invasion going on today in America, as well as the related election battle between Trump and the forces of evil. So it’s Saturday. It’s important. So even though this will probably take up all my day – it’s now or never. By the way, look up Bracken on Amazon. He’s got some good-looking novels out there. Bracken’s main thesis is that the great Muslim invasion is the culmination of a 3-way or triune battle for power between groups with entirely different worldviews. “Three great social forces are now set in motion for a 2016 showdown and collision that will, in historical terms, be on par with the First and Second World Wars.” Just like in the old board game, “Risk”, two of these great social forces are temporarily allied in an attempt to break the third. Force #1 Bracken rightly calls “international socialism”. Force #2 is Islam – which is, and will forever be - dedicated to world domination under Sharia law – no exceptions – do whatever it takes to get there. Force #3 are the nationalists. Since the very word - Nationalism - has been under attack for about a century, this takes some explaining. The founding fathers of the United States were very concerned about tyrants and tyranny. They wanted to create a system of self-governance that would protect their hard-won freedoms. So they built a system of government that was decentralized to the maximum extent that was still practical. Their solution was a concept built throughout the U.S. Constitution, but interestingly, never mentioned by name in the entire document – the separation-of-powers concept. The first line of defense was the power given to the individual state governments. But then, within the federal government, power is further separated into blocks of power in the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government. Everywhere you look in the U.S. Constitution you see this intent of the founders to prevent one group from getting too much power. What is the separation of powers concept at the international level? It is the absolute necessity of individual sovereign states – nationalism. What if a group of sovereign nations wouldn’t have ganged up to take down Hitler? All of Europe would be speaking German today. That’s a fact. The United Nations and the League of Nations before that have been direct attacks on this concept of the absolute necessity of sovereign nations remaining in place to foster the continued growth of human civilization and increase human freedom. People intuitively recognize this deep inside, and therefore, the League and subsequently, the UN have failed to destroy the nationalists. People love their nations for a reason. Think about it. The last century in Western Europe has been dominated by this struggle between Force #3 – nationalists – and Force #1 – international socialism or World Revolution. Over time, force #1 has gradually been weakening Force #3 – the individual sovereign state. Now, in steps Force #2 – Islam. Using the “Risk” game mentality, Force #1 now has allied themselves with Force #2 to murder Force #3, then divvy-up the rest of the world. How Force #1 cannot see that Islam will come after them just as soon as it finishes off the nationalists is the question. Why hasn’t Islam won if they have been at this conquest for 1400 years? Two factors - #1 is the ease of international travel today. Secondly, since there is no concept of a social compact – to work commonly towards the advancement of civilization – Islamic nations throw all their energies traditionally into the conquest, leaving a hollow core of poverty. The discovery of oil changed all that. Now, one Saudi Prince has pledged his entire 35 billion dollar fortune to the advancement of the Islamic Caliphate. To that end, he is the primary force behind the building of thousands of mosques in Europe and the U.S. According to Bracken: “Islam is similar to a self-replicating supercomputer virus. It is a hydra-headed monster, designed by its creators to be an unstoppable formula for global conquest.” “Islam itself has remained steadfastly at war with the non-Muslim world for 1,400 years.”