- published: 27 Sep 2012
- views: 44813
Create your page here
Tuesday, 29 December 2015
-
remove the playlistIndian Penal Code
- remove the playlistIndian Penal Code
Please tell us which country and city you'd like to see the weather in.
back to playlist
http://dkdubey.webs.com/
CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc...
- published: 13 Mar 2014
- views: 936
- author: Rakesh Kapoor
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life
299. Culpable homicide —
(a) A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpable homicide.
(b) A knows Z to be behind a bush. B does not know it A, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely to cause Z’s death, induces B to fire at the bush. B fires and kills Z. Here B may be guilty of no offence; but A has committed the offence of culpable homicide.
(c) A, by shooting at a fowl with intent to kill and steal it, kills B who is behind a bush; A not knowing that he was there. Here, although A was doing an unlawful act, he was not guilty of culpable homicide, as he did not intend to kill B, or to cause death by doing an act that he knew was likely to cause death.
Explanation I — A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death.
Explanation 2 — Where death is caused by bodily injury, the person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused the death, although by resorting to proper remedies and skilful treatment the death might have been prevented.
Explanation 3 — The causing of the death of child in the mother’s womb is not homicide. But it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child, if any part of that child has been brought forth, though the child may not have breathed or been completely born.
300. Murder —
Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or—
Secondly — If it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or—
Thirdly — If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or—
Fourthly — If the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid.
Exception 1 —When culpable homicide is not murder.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation, causes the death of the person who gave the provocation or causes the death of any other person by mistake or accident.
The above exception is subject to the following provisos: —
First — That the provocation is not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for killing or doing harm to any person.
Secondly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant.
Thirdly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.
Explanation — Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from amounting to murder is a question of fact.
Exception 2 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, in the exercise in good faith of the right of private defence of person or property, exceeds the power given to him by law and causes the death of the person against whom he is exercising such right of defence without premeditation, and without any intention of doing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence.
Exception 3 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, being a public servant or aiding a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers given to him by law, and causes death by doing an act which he, in good faith, believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant and without ill-will towards the person whose death is caused.
Exception 4 — Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.
- published: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founder & Faculty in PVP {Pankaj Vidhi Pravaah})
Join PVP on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PVPLaw
Mob- 8957568536, 0522 (4073916)
Pankaj Kumar Tripathi SBI Saving A/c 00000020098289599 branch Kapoorthala market, Lucknow.
- published: 10 Feb 2015
- views: 120
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation —
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person.
Explanation 1 —It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.
Explanation 2 —It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.
Explanation 3 —An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4 —No imputation is said to harm a person’s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.
First Exception —Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.—It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.
Second Exception—Public conduct of public servants.—It is not defamation to express in a good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Third Exception — Conduct of any person touching any public question.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Fourth Exception — Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.—It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings.
Explanation —A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.
Fifth Exception.—Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Sixth Exception—Merits of public performance.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.
Seventh Exception —Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another —It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.
Eight Exception —Accusation preferred in good faith to authorised person.—It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.
Ninth Exception—Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interests.—It is not defamation to make an impu
500. Punishment for defamation —
Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
501. Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory —
502. Sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter.
- published: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 690
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence —
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.
COMMENTS
(i) In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1991) Cr LJ 467 (SC)
(ii) The accused is not required to prove the plea of private defence of person beyond reasonable manner of doubt. The onus on the accused is only to show that the defence version is probable one which is reflected from the salient features and the circumstances in the prosecution case itself; Sawai Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 2 Crimes 148 (Raj).
97. Right of private defence of the body and of property —
Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99, to defend—
First — His own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body;
Secondly —The property, whether movable or immovable, of himself or of any other person, against any act which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, or which is an attempt to commit theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass.
98. Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc.—
When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, or by reason of any
misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence.
99. Acts against which there is no right of private defence —
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act, may not be strictly justifiable by law.
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not, reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law
There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.
Extent to which the right may be exercised —
The right of private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence.
Explanation 1 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant, as such, unless he knows or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is such public servant.
Explanation 2 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant, unless he knows, or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is acting by such direction, or unless such person states the authority under which he acts, or if he has authority in writing, unless he produces such authority, if demanded.
- published: 08 Sep 2014
- views: 0
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact...
- published: 30 Aug 2014
- views: 15
- author: Indian Law School
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- published: 14 Jan 2012
- views: 27355
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish...
- published: 29 Aug 2014
- views: 4
- author: Indian Law School
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective of their gender.
This week,'Kanoon Aur Aap' brings to you an interesting discussion about Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code which is drafted to safeguard the society from the evils like dowry. With a recent turn of events, most cases of dowry that are filed, are reportedly fake. The Supreme Court critically called it as "Legal Terrorism".
Radio Jyotirgamaya 91.2 MHz invited Mrs. Savita Saxena,
mediator at the Punjab/Haryana High Court and an impaneled lawyer at State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh; and Mr. Sunny Piplani and Mr. Rohit Dogra, volunteers at SaMRA, an organisation to help men with their rights.
Through this intelligent debate, Jyotirgamaya sends across a message to all its listeners to obey by the seriousness of the laws,
and one should keep in mind that one false allegation can completely devastate the lives of many. Tune in to the show this Sunday at 11.00 A.M and 7.30 P.M to increase your knowledge bank about the law.
- published: 11 Apr 2015
- views: 25
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
Of Robbery and Dacoity
390. Robbery —
In all robbery there is either theft or extortion.
When theft is robbery —Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carving away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
When extortion is robbery —Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint to that person or to some other person, and, by so putting in fear, induces the person so put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted.
Explanation —The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
391. Dacoity —
When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or where the whole number of persons conjointly committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting or aiding, is said to commit "dacoity".
392. Punishment for robbery —
393. Attempt to commit robbery —
394. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery —
395. Punishment for dacoity —
396. Dacoity with murder —
397. Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt
398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon
399. Making preparation to commit dacoity —
400. Punishment for belonging to gang of dacoits
401. Punishment for belonging to gang of thieves
402. Assembling for purpose of committing dacoity
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 5
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
107. Abetment of a thing —
A person abets the doing of a thing, who—
First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or
Secondly — Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
Thirdly — Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.
108. Abettor —
A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
108A. Abetment in India of offences outside India —
A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.
109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment —
Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence.
110. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor —
Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.
111. Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done —
When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it:
Proviso — Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment.
112. Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done —
If the act for which the abettor is liable under the last preceding section is committed in addition to the act abetted, and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences.
113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor —
When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect.
114. Abettor present when offence is committed —
Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence.
115. Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life—if offence not committed —
Whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, shall, if that offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;
116. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment—if offence be not committed —
117. Abetting commission of offence by the public or by more than ten persons —
118. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life
119. Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent —
120. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment —
Whoever, intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment, voluntarily conceals, by any act or illegal omission, the existence of a design to commit such offence, or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design,
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 1
Indian Penal Code (IPC, Hindi: भारतीय दण्ड संहिता) is the main criminal code of India. It is a comprehensive code, intended to cover all substantive aspects of criminal law. It was drafted in 1860 and came into force in colonial India during the British Raj in 1862. It has since been amended several times and is now supplemented by other criminal provisions.
After independence, Indian Penal Code was inherited by Pakistan (now called Pakistan Penal Code) and Bangladesh, formerly part of British India. It was also adopted wholesale by the British colonial authorities in Burma, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei, and remains the basis of the criminal codes in those countries.
During the Moghul rule courts administered the "Mohammaden" criminal law to the exclusion of Hindu law. Islamic law gave way to English criminal law with the increase of British influence in the Indian subcontinent. Before 1860, The English criminal law, as modified by several acts was administered in the Presidency-Towns of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Penal_Code
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
A criminal code (or penal code) is a document which compiles all, or a significant amount of, a particular jurisdiction's criminal law. Typically a criminal code will contain offences which are recognised in the jurisdiction, penalties which might be imposed for these offences and some general provisions (such as definitions and prohibitions on retroactive prosecution).
Criminal codes are relatively common in civil law jurisdictions, which tend to build legal systems around codes and principles which are relatively abstract and apply them on a case by case basis. Conversely they are rare in common law jurisdictions.
The proposed introduction of a criminal code in England and Wales was a significant project of the Law Commission from 1968 to 2008. Due to the strong tradition of precedent in the jurisdiction and consequently the large number of binding judgements and ambiguous 'common law offences', as well as the often inconsistent nature of English law - the creation of a satisfactory code became very difficult. The project was officially abandoned in 2008 although as of 2009 it has been revived.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_code
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
location on Google Map
Peneral (originally Peñeraal of a Spanish origin) is a town in south Trinidad. It lies south of San Fernando and Debe, and north of Siparia. Originally a rice and cocoa producing area, Penal has grown into an important town in the past few years and is now a desirable place for corporate expansion. The population is 12,281 people.
Penal is largely considered to be dominated by the East Indian descendants, more commonly referred to as Indians. The heart of Penal contains many businesses while the outskirts focus on agricultural development. Commercially, Penal has a police station, branches of two banks (Scotiabank and Republic Bank), health facilities, photo studios, fast food restaurants, a gas station and clothing stores as well as many schools, thus providing reasonably well for its populace.
Penal plays a major role in the energy supply to the nation's populace. Petrotrin, the national oil company, has a major sub-unit in Clarke Road and the National Gas Company has many gas lines running through Penal that links the gas fields of the South East Coast and the industrial estates. One of the countries three major power generating plants owned by Powergen Ltd is located at Syne Village to the west of Penal. This area is also known for the High Schools located in the Penal-Debe area. It is one of the areas in Trinidad that has the most schools. Penal is also known for the Doubles, Roti and Aloo-Pies which will always be packed with costumers for dilicious Cuisine. If you want culture Penal is one of the places to be.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
61:03INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
http://dkdubey.webs.com/ CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092 -
8:54Indian Penal Code -Video 1
Indian Penal Code -Video 1Indian Penal Code -Video 1
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc... -
14:46IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life 299. Culpable homicide — (a) A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpable homicide. (b) A knows Z to be behind a bush. B does not know it A, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely to cause Z’s death, induces B to fire at the bush. B fires and kills Z. Here B may be guilty of no offence; but A has committed the o -
28:33IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founder & Faculty in PVP {Pankaj Vidhi Pravaah}) Join PVP on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PVPLaw Mob- 8957568536, 0522 (4073916) Pankaj Kumar Tripathi SBI Saving A/c 00000020098289599 branch Kapoorthala market, Lucknow. -
9:46IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation — Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person. Explanation 1 —It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives. Explanation 2 — -
6:05IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence — Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence. COMMENTS (i) In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1991) Cr LJ 467 (SC) (ii) The accused is not required to prove the plea of private defence of person beyond reasonable manner of doubt. The onus on the accused is only to show that the defence version is probable one which is reflected from the salient features and the circumstances in the prosecution case -
11:03IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact... -
24:55IPC part1
IPC part1IPC part1
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC) -
16:43IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish... -
7:09Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective of their gender. This week,'Kanoon Aur Aap' brings to you an interesting discussion about Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code which is drafted to safeguard the society from the evils like dowry. With a recent turn of events, most cases of dowry that are filed, are reportedly fake. The Supreme Court critically called it as "Legal Terrorism". Radio Jyotirgamaya 91.2 MHz invited Mrs. Savita Saxena, mediator at the Punjab/Haryana High Court and an impaneled lawyer at State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh; and Mr. Sunny Piplani and Mr. Rohit Dogra, -
9:12IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Of Robbery and Dacoity 390. Robbery — In all robbery there is either theft or extortion. When theft is robbery —Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carving away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint. When extortion is robbery —Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the prese -
16:02IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 107. Abetment of a thing — A person abets the doing of a thing, who— First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or Secondly — Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or Thirdly — Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. 108. Abettor — A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable b -
7:16IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 349. Force — A person is said to use force to another if he causes motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion to that other, or if he causes to any substance such motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion as brings that substance into contact with any part of that other’s body, or with anything which that other is wearing or carrying, or with anything so situated that such contact affects that other’s sense of feeling: Provided that the person causing the motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion, causes that motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion in o -
3:14IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER VA - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY 120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy — When two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done,— (1) an illegal act, or (2) an act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy: Provided that no agreement except an agreement to commit an offence shall amount to a criminal conspiracy unless some act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties to such agreement in pursuance thereof. Explanation — It is immaterial whether the illegal act is the ultimate object of such agreement, or is merely incidental to that objec
- Assault
- Attempt
- Bangladesh
- Barnes Peacock
- Bollywood
- Breach of Trust
- British Raj
- Brunei
- Burma
- Calcutta
- Cheating
- Confinement
- Continental Europe
- Contract
- Criminal code
- Criminal justice
- Criminal law
- Defamation
- Edward Livingston
- English criminal law
- Extortion
- False Evidence
- Government of India
- Hindi
- Hindu law
- Homicide
- India
- Indian Evidence Act
- Indian Penal Code
- Indian subcontinent
- Intimidation
- Islamic law
- Jammu and Kashmir
- Kidnapping
- Legislative Council
- Louisiana Civil Code
- Malaysia
- Malimath Committee
- Marriage
- Moghul Empire
- Murder
- Napoleonic Code
- Pakistan
- Pakistan Penal Code
- Parliament of India
- Penal law
- Property
- Public Servant
- Pulp literature
- Rape
- Religion
- Robbery
- Section 420
- Shree 420
- Singapore
- Sri Lanka
- Supreme Court
- Theft
- Trespass
- United Kingdom
- Wikipedia Merging
-
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
http://dkdubey.webs.com/ CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092 -
Indian Penal Code -Video 1
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc... -
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life 299. Culpable homicide — (a) A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpab -
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founder & Faculty in PVP {Pankaj Vidhi Pravaah}) Join PVP on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PVPLaw Mob- 8957568536, 0522 (4073916) Pankaj Kumar Tripathi SBI Saving A/c 00000020098289599 branch Kapoorthala market, Lucknow. -
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation — Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person. Expl -
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence — Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence. COMMENTS (i) In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1991) Cr LJ 467 (SC) (ii) The accused is not required to -
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact... -
IPC part1
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC) -
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish... -
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective of their gender. This week,'Kanoon Aur Aap' brings to you an interesting discussion about Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code which is drafted to safeguard the society from the evils like dowry. With a recent turn of events, most cases of dowry that are filed, are reportedly fake. The Supreme Court critic -
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Of Robbery and Dacoity 390. Robbery — In all robbery there is either theft or extortion. When theft is robbery —Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carving away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to -
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 107. Abetment of a thing — A person abets the doing of a thing, who— First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or Secondly — Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or Thirdly — Intent -
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 349. Force — A person is said to use force to another if he causes motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion to that other, or if he causes to any substance such motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion as brings that substance into contact with any part of that other’s body, or with anything which that other is wearing or c -
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER VA - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY 120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy — When two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done,— (1) an illegal act, or (2) an act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy: Provided that no agreement except an agreement to commit an offence shall amount to a criminal cons -
IPC Criminal Breach of Trust (S.405-409) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 405. Criminal breach of trust — Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any leg -
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872,Maharashtra Police Act,
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872, Maharashtra Police Act, Laws Details for YouTube, It is our Try to give Information about Laws to common Public, Total 25 Laws for Study in one apps, Maximum laws In English and Marathi For Purchase : Android and Desktop Apps, Contact: Ajinkya Innovations,Pune. Mob: 9175391815 / 02030585511, Email : ajinkyainnovations@gmail.com http://www.a -
IPC Dowry Death S 304B : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 304B. Dowry death — (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with, any de -
IPC (S. 420) Cheating and inducing delivery of property : Indian Penal Code, 1860
in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property — Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property... -
INDIAN PENAL CODE PART 2.1 (IPC) AT DELHI BY D K DUBEY ENGLISH
mail us on alawmagic@gmail.com. -
Indian penal code section 498A || Voice Of Vanitha Part 1
VANITHA TV - First Women Centric Channel in India Click here to Subscribe for more Videos: https://goo.gl/O9N2d1 LIKE us on FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/vanithatv -
IPC Theft (S.378-382) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XVII - OF OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY Of Theft 378. Theft — Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft. Explanation 1 — A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being movable property, is not -
IPC Offences Relating to Marriage (S.493-498) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XX - OF OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGE 493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage — Every man who by deceit causes any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with imprisonm -
IPC Hurt and Grevious (Hurt S.319-335) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi Of Hurt 319. Hurt — Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt. 320. Grievous hurt — The following kinds of hurt only are designated as "grievous": — First — Emasculation. Secondly — Permanent privation of the sight of either eye. Thirdly — Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear, Fourthly — Privation of any member or joint. Fifthly.— D
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 61:03
- Updated: 27 Sep 2012
- views: 44813
http://dkdubey.webs.com/
CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092...
http://dkdubey.webs.com/
CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092
wn.com/Indian Penal Code (Basic) By D.K.Dubey (Ipc)
http://dkdubey.webs.com/
CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092
- published: 27 Sep 2012
- views: 44813
Indian Penal Code -Video 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:54
- Updated: 03 Sep 2014
- views: 936
- author: Rakesh Kapoor
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc......
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc...
wn.com/Indian Penal Code Video 1
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc...
- published: 13 Mar 2014
- views: 936
- author: Rakesh Kapoor
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 14:46
- Updated: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life
299. Culpable homicide —
(a) A lays sticks a...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life
299. Culpable homicide —
(a) A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpable homicide.
(b) A knows Z to be behind a bush. B does not know it A, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely to cause Z’s death, induces B to fire at the bush. B fires and kills Z. Here B may be guilty of no offence; but A has committed the offence of culpable homicide.
(c) A, by shooting at a fowl with intent to kill and steal it, kills B who is behind a bush; A not knowing that he was there. Here, although A was doing an unlawful act, he was not guilty of culpable homicide, as he did not intend to kill B, or to cause death by doing an act that he knew was likely to cause death.
Explanation I — A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death.
Explanation 2 — Where death is caused by bodily injury, the person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused the death, although by resorting to proper remedies and skilful treatment the death might have been prevented.
Explanation 3 — The causing of the death of child in the mother’s womb is not homicide. But it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child, if any part of that child has been brought forth, though the child may not have breathed or been completely born.
300. Murder —
Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or—
Secondly — If it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or—
Thirdly — If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or—
Fourthly — If the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid.
Exception 1 —When culpable homicide is not murder.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation, causes the death of the person who gave the provocation or causes the death of any other person by mistake or accident.
The above exception is subject to the following provisos: —
First — That the provocation is not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for killing or doing harm to any person.
Secondly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant.
Thirdly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.
Explanation — Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from amounting to murder is a question of fact.
Exception 2 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, in the exercise in good faith of the right of private defence of person or property, exceeds the power given to him by law and causes the death of the person against whom he is exercising such right of defence without premeditation, and without any intention of doing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence.
Exception 3 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, being a public servant or aiding a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers given to him by law, and causes death by doing an act which he, in good faith, believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant and without ill-will towards the person whose death is caused.
Exception 4 — Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.
wn.com/Ipc Definitions Of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299 300) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life
299. Culpable homicide —
(a) A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpable homicide.
(b) A knows Z to be behind a bush. B does not know it A, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely to cause Z’s death, induces B to fire at the bush. B fires and kills Z. Here B may be guilty of no offence; but A has committed the offence of culpable homicide.
(c) A, by shooting at a fowl with intent to kill and steal it, kills B who is behind a bush; A not knowing that he was there. Here, although A was doing an unlawful act, he was not guilty of culpable homicide, as he did not intend to kill B, or to cause death by doing an act that he knew was likely to cause death.
Explanation I — A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death.
Explanation 2 — Where death is caused by bodily injury, the person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused the death, although by resorting to proper remedies and skilful treatment the death might have been prevented.
Explanation 3 — The causing of the death of child in the mother’s womb is not homicide. But it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child, if any part of that child has been brought forth, though the child may not have breathed or been completely born.
300. Murder —
Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or—
Secondly — If it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or—
Thirdly — If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or—
Fourthly — If the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid.
Exception 1 —When culpable homicide is not murder.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation, causes the death of the person who gave the provocation or causes the death of any other person by mistake or accident.
The above exception is subject to the following provisos: —
First — That the provocation is not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for killing or doing harm to any person.
Secondly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant.
Thirdly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.
Explanation — Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from amounting to murder is a question of fact.
Exception 2 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, in the exercise in good faith of the right of private defence of person or property, exceeds the power given to him by law and causes the death of the person against whom he is exercising such right of defence without premeditation, and without any intention of doing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence.
Exception 3 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, being a public servant or aiding a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers given to him by law, and causes death by doing an act which he, in good faith, believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant and without ill-will towards the person whose death is caused.
Exception 4 — Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.
- published: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:33
- Updated: 10 Feb 2015
- views: 120
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founder & Faculty in PVP {Pankaj Vidhi Pravaah})
Join PVP on Facebook: https...
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founder & Faculty in PVP {Pankaj Vidhi Pravaah})
Join PVP on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PVPLaw
Mob- 8957568536, 0522 (4073916)
Pankaj Kumar Tripathi SBI Saving A/c 00000020098289599 branch Kapoorthala market, Lucknow.
wn.com/Ipc 1860 (Classification Of The Chapters)
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founder & Faculty in PVP {Pankaj Vidhi Pravaah})
Join PVP on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PVPLaw
Mob- 8957568536, 0522 (4073916)
Pankaj Kumar Tripathi SBI Saving A/c 00000020098289599 branch Kapoorthala market, Lucknow.
- published: 10 Feb 2015
- views: 120
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 9:46
- Updated: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 690
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation —
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publis...
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation —
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person.
Explanation 1 —It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.
Explanation 2 —It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.
Explanation 3 —An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4 —No imputation is said to harm a person’s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.
First Exception —Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.—It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.
Second Exception—Public conduct of public servants.—It is not defamation to express in a good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Third Exception — Conduct of any person touching any public question.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Fourth Exception — Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.—It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings.
Explanation —A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.
Fifth Exception.—Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Sixth Exception—Merits of public performance.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.
Seventh Exception —Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another —It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.
Eight Exception —Accusation preferred in good faith to authorised person.—It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.
Ninth Exception—Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interests.—It is not defamation to make an impu
500. Punishment for defamation —
Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
501. Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory —
502. Sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter.
wn.com/Ipc Defamation (S.499 502) Indian Penal Code, 1860
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation —
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person.
Explanation 1 —It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.
Explanation 2 —It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.
Explanation 3 —An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4 —No imputation is said to harm a person’s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.
First Exception —Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.—It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.
Second Exception—Public conduct of public servants.—It is not defamation to express in a good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Third Exception — Conduct of any person touching any public question.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Fourth Exception — Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.—It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings.
Explanation —A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.
Fifth Exception.—Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
Sixth Exception—Merits of public performance.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.
Seventh Exception —Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another —It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.
Eight Exception —Accusation preferred in good faith to authorised person.—It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.
Ninth Exception—Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interests.—It is not defamation to make an impu
500. Punishment for defamation —
Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
501. Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory —
502. Sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter.
- published: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 690
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:05
- Updated: 08 Sep 2014
- views: 0
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence —
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.
COMMEN...
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence —
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.
COMMENTS
(i) In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1991) Cr LJ 467 (SC)
(ii) The accused is not required to prove the plea of private defence of person beyond reasonable manner of doubt. The onus on the accused is only to show that the defence version is probable one which is reflected from the salient features and the circumstances in the prosecution case itself; Sawai Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 2 Crimes 148 (Raj).
97. Right of private defence of the body and of property —
Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99, to defend—
First — His own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body;
Secondly —The property, whether movable or immovable, of himself or of any other person, against any act which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, or which is an attempt to commit theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass.
98. Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc.—
When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, or by reason of any
misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence.
99. Acts against which there is no right of private defence —
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act, may not be strictly justifiable by law.
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not, reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law
There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.
Extent to which the right may be exercised —
The right of private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence.
Explanation 1 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant, as such, unless he knows or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is such public servant.
Explanation 2 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant, unless he knows, or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is acting by such direction, or unless such person states the authority under which he acts, or if he has authority in writing, unless he produces such authority, if demanded.
wn.com/Ipc Right Of Private Defence (S.96 99) Indian Penal Code, 1860
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence —
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.
COMMENTS
(i) In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1991) Cr LJ 467 (SC)
(ii) The accused is not required to prove the plea of private defence of person beyond reasonable manner of doubt. The onus on the accused is only to show that the defence version is probable one which is reflected from the salient features and the circumstances in the prosecution case itself; Sawai Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 2 Crimes 148 (Raj).
97. Right of private defence of the body and of property —
Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99, to defend—
First — His own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body;
Secondly —The property, whether movable or immovable, of himself or of any other person, against any act which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, or which is an attempt to commit theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass.
98. Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc.—
When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, or by reason of any
misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence.
99. Acts against which there is no right of private defence —
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act, may not be strictly justifiable by law.
There is no right of private defence against an act which does not, reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law
There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.
Extent to which the right may be exercised —
The right of private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence.
Explanation 1 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant, as such, unless he knows or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is such public servant.
Explanation 2 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant, unless he knows, or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is acting by such direction, or unless such person states the authority under which he acts, or if he has authority in writing, unless he produces such authority, if demanded.
- published: 08 Sep 2014
- views: 0
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:03
- Updated: 30 Aug 2014
- views: 15
- author: Indian Law School
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact......
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact...
wn.com/Ipc General Exception Upto Section 95 Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact...
- published: 30 Aug 2014
- views: 15
- author: Indian Law School
IPC part1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 24:55
- Updated: 14 Jan 2012
- views: 27355
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC)...
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC)
wn.com/Ipc Part1
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- published: 14 Jan 2012
- views: 27355
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 16:43
- Updated: 30 Aug 2014
- views: 4
- author: Indian Law School
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish......
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish...
wn.com/Ipc Upto Section 75 Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish...
- published: 29 Aug 2014
- views: 4
- author: Indian Law School
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:09
- Updated: 11 Apr 2015
- views: 25
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective of their gender.
This week,'Kanoon Aur Aap' brings to you an interest...
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective of their gender.
This week,'Kanoon Aur Aap' brings to you an interesting discussion about Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code which is drafted to safeguard the society from the evils like dowry. With a recent turn of events, most cases of dowry that are filed, are reportedly fake. The Supreme Court critically called it as "Legal Terrorism".
Radio Jyotirgamaya 91.2 MHz invited Mrs. Savita Saxena,
mediator at the Punjab/Haryana High Court and an impaneled lawyer at State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh; and Mr. Sunny Piplani and Mr. Rohit Dogra, volunteers at SaMRA, an organisation to help men with their rights.
Through this intelligent debate, Jyotirgamaya sends across a message to all its listeners to obey by the seriousness of the laws,
and one should keep in mind that one false allegation can completely devastate the lives of many. Tune in to the show this Sunday at 11.00 A.M and 7.30 P.M to increase your knowledge bank about the law.
wn.com/Section 498A Of The Indian Penal Code And Its Misuse..
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective of their gender.
This week,'Kanoon Aur Aap' brings to you an interesting discussion about Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code which is drafted to safeguard the society from the evils like dowry. With a recent turn of events, most cases of dowry that are filed, are reportedly fake. The Supreme Court critically called it as "Legal Terrorism".
Radio Jyotirgamaya 91.2 MHz invited Mrs. Savita Saxena,
mediator at the Punjab/Haryana High Court and an impaneled lawyer at State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh; and Mr. Sunny Piplani and Mr. Rohit Dogra, volunteers at SaMRA, an organisation to help men with their rights.
Through this intelligent debate, Jyotirgamaya sends across a message to all its listeners to obey by the seriousness of the laws,
and one should keep in mind that one false allegation can completely devastate the lives of many. Tune in to the show this Sunday at 11.00 A.M and 7.30 P.M to increase your knowledge bank about the law.
- published: 11 Apr 2015
- views: 25
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 9:12
- Updated: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 5
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
Of Robbery and Dacoity
390. Robbery —
In all robbery there is either theft or extortion.
When theft is robbery —Th...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
Of Robbery and Dacoity
390. Robbery —
In all robbery there is either theft or extortion.
When theft is robbery —Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carving away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
When extortion is robbery —Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint to that person or to some other person, and, by so putting in fear, induces the person so put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted.
Explanation —The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
391. Dacoity —
When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or where the whole number of persons conjointly committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting or aiding, is said to commit "dacoity".
392. Punishment for robbery —
393. Attempt to commit robbery —
394. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery —
395. Punishment for dacoity —
396. Dacoity with murder —
397. Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt
398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon
399. Making preparation to commit dacoity —
400. Punishment for belonging to gang of dacoits
401. Punishment for belonging to gang of thieves
402. Assembling for purpose of committing dacoity
wn.com/Ipc Robbery And Dacoity (S.390 402) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
Of Robbery and Dacoity
390. Robbery —
In all robbery there is either theft or extortion.
When theft is robbery —Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carving away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
When extortion is robbery —Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint to that person or to some other person, and, by so putting in fear, induces the person so put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted.
Explanation —The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
391. Dacoity —
When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or where the whole number of persons conjointly committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting or aiding, is said to commit "dacoity".
392. Punishment for robbery —
393. Attempt to commit robbery —
394. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery —
395. Punishment for dacoity —
396. Dacoity with murder —
397. Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt
398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon
399. Making preparation to commit dacoity —
400. Punishment for belonging to gang of dacoits
401. Punishment for belonging to gang of thieves
402. Assembling for purpose of committing dacoity
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 5
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 16:02
- Updated: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 1
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
107. Abetment of a thing —
A person abets the doing of a thing, who—
First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or
Se...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
107. Abetment of a thing —
A person abets the doing of a thing, who—
First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or
Secondly — Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
Thirdly — Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.
108. Abettor —
A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
108A. Abetment in India of offences outside India —
A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.
109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment —
Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence.
110. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor —
Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.
111. Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done —
When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it:
Proviso — Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment.
112. Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done —
If the act for which the abettor is liable under the last preceding section is committed in addition to the act abetted, and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences.
113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor —
When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect.
114. Abettor present when offence is committed —
Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence.
115. Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life—if offence not committed —
Whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, shall, if that offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;
116. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment—if offence be not committed —
117. Abetting commission of offence by the public or by more than ten persons —
118. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life
119. Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent —
120. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment —
Whoever, intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment, voluntarily conceals, by any act or illegal omission, the existence of a design to commit such offence, or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design,
wn.com/Ipc Abettment (S.107 120) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
107. Abetment of a thing —
A person abets the doing of a thing, who—
First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or
Secondly — Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
Thirdly — Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.
108. Abettor —
A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
108A. Abetment in India of offences outside India —
A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.
109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment —
Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence.
110. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor —
Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.
111. Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done —
When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it:
Proviso — Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment.
112. Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done —
If the act for which the abettor is liable under the last preceding section is committed in addition to the act abetted, and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences.
113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor —
When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect.
114. Abettor present when offence is committed —
Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence.
115. Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life—if offence not committed —
Whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, shall, if that offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;
116. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment—if offence be not committed —
117. Abetting commission of offence by the public or by more than ten persons —
118. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life
119. Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent —
120. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment —
Whoever, intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment, voluntarily conceals, by any act or illegal omission, the existence of a design to commit such offence, or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design,
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 1
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:16
- Updated: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 6
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
349. Force —
A person is said to use force to another if he causes motion, change of motion, or cessatio...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
349. Force —
A person is said to use force to another if he causes motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion to that other, or if he causes to any substance such motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion as brings that substance into contact with any part of that other’s body, or with anything which that other is wearing or carrying, or with anything so situated that such contact affects that other’s sense of feeling: Provided that the person causing the motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion, causes that motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion in one of the three ways hereinafter described.
First — By his own bodily power.
Secondly — By disposing any substance in such a manner that the motion or change or cessation of motion takes place without any further act on his part, or on the part of any other person.
Thirdly — By inducing any animal to move, to change its motion, or to cease to move.
350. Criminal force —
Whoever intentionally uses force to any person, without that person’s consent, in order to the committing of any offence, or intending by the use of such force to cause, or knowing it to be likely that by the use of such force he will cause injury, fear or annoyance to the person to whom the force is used, is said to use criminal force to that other.
351. Assault —
Whoever makes any gesture, or any preparation intending or knowing it to be likely that such gesture or preparation will cause any person present to apprehend that he who makes that gesture or preparation is about to use criminal force to that person, is said to commit an assault.
Explanation — Mere words do not amount to an assault. But the words which a person uses may give to his gestures or preparation such a meaning as may make those gestures or preparations amount to an assault.
352. Punishment for assault or criminal force otherwise than on grave provocation —
Explanation — Grave and sudden provocation will not mitigate the punishment for an offence under this section. if the provocation is sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for the offence, or if the provocation is given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant, in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant, or if the provocation is given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.
Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to mitigate the offence, is a question of fact.
353. Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty —
354. Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty —
355. Assault or criminal force with intent to dishonour person, otherwise than on grave provocation —
356. Assault or criminal force in attempt to commit theft of property carried by a person —
357. Assault or criminal force in attempt wrongfully to confine a person —
358. Assault or criminal force on grave provocation —
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person on grave and sudden provocation given by that person, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both.
Explanation —The last section is subject to the same Explanation as section 352.
wn.com/Ipc Criminal Force And Assault (S.349 358) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
349. Force —
A person is said to use force to another if he causes motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion to that other, or if he causes to any substance such motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion as brings that substance into contact with any part of that other’s body, or with anything which that other is wearing or carrying, or with anything so situated that such contact affects that other’s sense of feeling: Provided that the person causing the motion, or change of motion, or cessation of motion, causes that motion, change of motion, or cessation of motion in one of the three ways hereinafter described.
First — By his own bodily power.
Secondly — By disposing any substance in such a manner that the motion or change or cessation of motion takes place without any further act on his part, or on the part of any other person.
Thirdly — By inducing any animal to move, to change its motion, or to cease to move.
350. Criminal force —
Whoever intentionally uses force to any person, without that person’s consent, in order to the committing of any offence, or intending by the use of such force to cause, or knowing it to be likely that by the use of such force he will cause injury, fear or annoyance to the person to whom the force is used, is said to use criminal force to that other.
351. Assault —
Whoever makes any gesture, or any preparation intending or knowing it to be likely that such gesture or preparation will cause any person present to apprehend that he who makes that gesture or preparation is about to use criminal force to that person, is said to commit an assault.
Explanation — Mere words do not amount to an assault. But the words which a person uses may give to his gestures or preparation such a meaning as may make those gestures or preparations amount to an assault.
352. Punishment for assault or criminal force otherwise than on grave provocation —
Explanation — Grave and sudden provocation will not mitigate the punishment for an offence under this section. if the provocation is sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for the offence, or if the provocation is given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant, in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant, or if the provocation is given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.
Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to mitigate the offence, is a question of fact.
353. Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty —
354. Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty —
355. Assault or criminal force with intent to dishonour person, otherwise than on grave provocation —
356. Assault or criminal force in attempt to commit theft of property carried by a person —
357. Assault or criminal force in attempt wrongfully to confine a person —
358. Assault or criminal force on grave provocation —
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person on grave and sudden provocation given by that person, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both.
Explanation —The last section is subject to the same Explanation as section 352.
- published: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 6
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:14
- Updated: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 0
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER VA - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy —
When two or more persons agree to do, or cause ...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER VA - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy —
When two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done,—
(1) an illegal act, or
(2) an act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy:
Provided that no agreement except an agreement to commit an offence shall amount to a criminal conspiracy unless some act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties to such agreement in pursuance thereof.
Explanation — It is immaterial whether the illegal act is the ultimate object of such agreement, or is merely incidental to that object.
COMMENTS
(i) The prosecution is not required to prove that perpetrators agreed to do or cause to be done the illegal act; Mohammad Usman Mohammad Hussain Maniyar v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981 SC 162: (1981) SC Cr 381: (1981) Cr LJ 597.
(ii) The evidence as to transmission of thoughts sharing the unlawful design may be sufficient; Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.), (1989) Cr LJ 1: AIR 1988 SC 1883.
120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy —
(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.
(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.
wn.com/Ipc Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER VA - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy —
When two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done,—
(1) an illegal act, or
(2) an act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy:
Provided that no agreement except an agreement to commit an offence shall amount to a criminal conspiracy unless some act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties to such agreement in pursuance thereof.
Explanation — It is immaterial whether the illegal act is the ultimate object of such agreement, or is merely incidental to that object.
COMMENTS
(i) The prosecution is not required to prove that perpetrators agreed to do or cause to be done the illegal act; Mohammad Usman Mohammad Hussain Maniyar v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981 SC 162: (1981) SC Cr 381: (1981) Cr LJ 597.
(ii) The evidence as to transmission of thoughts sharing the unlawful design may be sufficient; Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.), (1989) Cr LJ 1: AIR 1988 SC 1883.
120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy —
(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.
(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 0
IPC Criminal Breach of Trust (S.405-409) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:26
- Updated: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 1
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
405. Criminal breach of trust —
Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over p...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
405. Criminal breach of trust —
Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust".
405. Criminal breach of trust —
Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust".
(a) A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriate them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
(b) A is a warehouse-keeper. Z going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
(c) A, residing in Calcutta, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z’s direction. Z remits a lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’s paper. A dishonestly disobeys the direction and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
406. Punishment for criminal breach of trust —
407. Criminal breach of trust by carrier, etc.—
408. Criminal breach of trust by clerk or servant —
409. Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent.—
wn.com/Ipc Criminal Breach Of Trust (S.405 409) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
405. Criminal breach of trust —
Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust".
405. Criminal breach of trust —
Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust".
(a) A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriate them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
(b) A is a warehouse-keeper. Z going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
(c) A, residing in Calcutta, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z’s direction. Z remits a lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’s paper. A dishonestly disobeys the direction and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
406. Punishment for criminal breach of trust —
407. Criminal breach of trust by carrier, etc.—
408. Criminal breach of trust by clerk or servant —
409. Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent.—
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 1
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872,Maharashtra Police Act,
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:45
- Updated: 21 May 2015
- views: 11
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872, Maharashtra Police Act, Laws Details for YouTube, It is our Try to give Information about Laws to comm...
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872, Maharashtra Police Act, Laws Details for YouTube, It is our Try to give Information about Laws to common Public, Total 25 Laws for Study in one apps, Maximum laws In English and Marathi
For Purchase : Android and Desktop Apps,
Contact: Ajinkya Innovations,Pune.
Mob: 9175391815 / 02030585511,
Email : ajinkyainnovations@gmail.com http://www.ajinkyainnovations.in
Price Only for 300 Rs.
1)Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC 1860) In English and Marathi
भारतीय दंड संहिता १८६०
2)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(Cr.P.C 1973)In English and Marathi फौजदारी प्रक्रिया संहिता १९७३
3)The Indian Evidence Act,1872 In English and Marathi
भारतीय पुरावा अधिनियम १८७२
4)The Maharashtra Police Act,1951 In English and Marathi
फौजदारी प्रक्रिया संहिता १९७३
5)The Juvenile Justice Act 6)POSCO Act 2012
लैंगिक अपराधांपासून बालकांचे संरक्षण अधिनियम, २०१२
7)वाहतुक नियम व दंड 8)माहिती तंत्रज्ञान अधिनियम, २०००
इतर संक्षिप्त कायदे
मुंबई दारुबंदी अधिनियम १९४९, नागरी हक्क संरक्षण अधिनियम १९५५,
मोटार वाहन अधिनियम १९८८, महाराष्ट्र मोटार वाहन नियम १९८९, मुंबई जुगार प्रतिबंध अधिनियम १८८७,शस्त्र अधिनियम १९५९, मानसिक आरोग्य अधिनियम १९८७, लोकप्रतिनिधीत्व अधिनियम १९८९, अत्याचार प्रतिबंध अधिनियम १९८९,
महाराष्ट्र झोपडपट्टीदादा हातभट्टीवाले अधिनियम १९८१,
This apps make for Study Purpose only. Not for any Legal Purpose.
wn.com/Ipc 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872,Maharashtra Police Act,
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Act,1872, Maharashtra Police Act, Laws Details for YouTube, It is our Try to give Information about Laws to common Public, Total 25 Laws for Study in one apps, Maximum laws In English and Marathi
For Purchase : Android and Desktop Apps,
Contact: Ajinkya Innovations,Pune.
Mob: 9175391815 / 02030585511,
Email : ajinkyainnovations@gmail.com http://www.ajinkyainnovations.in
Price Only for 300 Rs.
1)Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC 1860) In English and Marathi
भारतीय दंड संहिता १८६०
2)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(Cr.P.C 1973)In English and Marathi फौजदारी प्रक्रिया संहिता १९७३
3)The Indian Evidence Act,1872 In English and Marathi
भारतीय पुरावा अधिनियम १८७२
4)The Maharashtra Police Act,1951 In English and Marathi
फौजदारी प्रक्रिया संहिता १९७३
5)The Juvenile Justice Act 6)POSCO Act 2012
लैंगिक अपराधांपासून बालकांचे संरक्षण अधिनियम, २०१२
7)वाहतुक नियम व दंड 8)माहिती तंत्रज्ञान अधिनियम, २०००
इतर संक्षिप्त कायदे
मुंबई दारुबंदी अधिनियम १९४९, नागरी हक्क संरक्षण अधिनियम १९५५,
मोटार वाहन अधिनियम १९८८, महाराष्ट्र मोटार वाहन नियम १९८९, मुंबई जुगार प्रतिबंध अधिनियम १८८७,शस्त्र अधिनियम १९५९, मानसिक आरोग्य अधिनियम १९८७, लोकप्रतिनिधीत्व अधिनियम १९८९, अत्याचार प्रतिबंध अधिनियम १९८९,
महाराष्ट्र झोपडपट्टीदादा हातभट्टीवाले अधिनियम १९८१,
This apps make for Study Purpose only. Not for any Legal Purpose.
- published: 21 May 2015
- views: 11
IPC Dowry Death S 304B : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:19
- Updated: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
304B. Dowry death —
(1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs oth...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
304B. Dowry death —
(1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection
with, any demand for dowry, such death shall be called "dowry death", and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death.
Explanation —For the purpose of this sub-section, "dowry" shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).
(2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
Punishment—Imprisonment of not less than 7 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life—Cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Court of Session— Non-compoundable.
COMMENTS
Section 304B is a substantive provision creating a new offence and not merely a provision effecting a change in procedure for trial of a pre-existing substantive offence. As a consequence, accused cannot be tried and punished for the offence of dowry death provided in section 304-B of the Code with the minimum sentence of seven years’ imprisonment for an act done by them prior to creation of the new offence of dowry death; Soni Devrajbhai Babubhai v. State of Gujarat, 1991 Cr LJ (313) (SC).
wn.com/Ipc Dowry Death S 304B Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
304B. Dowry death —
(1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection
with, any demand for dowry, such death shall be called "dowry death", and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death.
Explanation —For the purpose of this sub-section, "dowry" shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).
(2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
Punishment—Imprisonment of not less than 7 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life—Cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Court of Session— Non-compoundable.
COMMENTS
Section 304B is a substantive provision creating a new offence and not merely a provision effecting a change in procedure for trial of a pre-existing substantive offence. As a consequence, accused cannot be tried and punished for the offence of dowry death provided in section 304-B of the Code with the minimum sentence of seven years’ imprisonment for an act done by them prior to creation of the new offence of dowry death; Soni Devrajbhai Babubhai v. State of Gujarat, 1991 Cr LJ (313) (SC).
- published: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
IPC (S. 420) Cheating and inducing delivery of property : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:28
- Updated: 05 Sep 2014
- views: 2
- author: Indian Law School
in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property — Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person d...
in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property — Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property...
wn.com/Ipc (S. 420) Cheating And Inducing Delivery Of Property Indian Penal Code, 1860
in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC in Hindi IPC 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property — Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property...
- published: 05 Sep 2014
- views: 2
- author: Indian Law School
INDIAN PENAL CODE PART 2.1 (IPC) AT DELHI BY D K DUBEY ENGLISH
mail us on alawmagic@gmail.com....
mail us on alawmagic@gmail.com.
wn.com/Indian Penal Code Part 2.1 (Ipc) At Delhi By D K Dubey English
mail us on alawmagic@gmail.com.
- published: 08 Jan 2014
- views: 1132
- author: DKDUBEYJI
Indian penal code section 498A || Voice Of Vanitha Part 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:16
- Updated: 15 Feb 2014
- views: 44
VANITHA TV - First Women Centric Channel in India
Click here to Subscribe for more Videos: https://goo.gl/O9N2d1
LIKE us on FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/...
VANITHA TV - First Women Centric Channel in India
Click here to Subscribe for more Videos: https://goo.gl/O9N2d1
LIKE us on FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/vanithatv
wn.com/Indian Penal Code Section 498A || Voice Of Vanitha Part 1
VANITHA TV - First Women Centric Channel in India
Click here to Subscribe for more Videos: https://goo.gl/O9N2d1
LIKE us on FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/vanithatv
- published: 15 Feb 2014
- views: 44
IPC Theft (S.378-382) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 12:05
- Updated: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 490
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVII - OF OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY Of Theft
378. Theft —
Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable prop...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVII - OF OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY Of Theft
378. Theft —
Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.
Explanation 1 — A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being movable property, is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.
Explanation 2 — A moving effected by the same act which affects the severance may be a theft.
Explanation 3 — A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented it from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.
Explanation 4 — A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.
Explanation 5 —The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied, and may be given either by the person in possession, or by any person having for the purpose authority either express or implied.
(j) If A owes money to Z for repairing the watch, and if Z retains the watch lawfully as a security for the debt, and A takes the watch out of Z’s possession, with the intention of depriving Z of the property as a security for his debt, he commits theft, in as much as he takes it dishonestly.
(k) Again, if A, having pawned his watch to Z, takes it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent, not having paid what he borrowed on the watch, he commits theft, though the watch is his own property in as much as he takes it dishonestly.
(l) A takes an article belonging to Z out of Z’s possession, without Z’s consent, with the intention of keeping it until he obtains money from Z as a reward for its restoration. Here A takes dishonestly; A has therefore committed theft.
(m) A, being on friendly terms with Z, goes into Z’s library in Z’s absence, and takes away a book without Z’s express consent for the purpose merely of reading it, and with the intention of returning it. Here, it is probable that A may have
conceived that he had Z’s implied consent to use Z’s book. If this was A’s impression, A has not committed theft.
379. Punishment for theft —
Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
380. Theft in dwelling house, etc.—
381. Theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of master —
382. Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to the committing of the theft —
(a) A commits theft on property in Z’s possession; and, while committing this theft, he has a loaded pistol under his garment, having provided this pistol for the purpose of hurting Z in case Z should resist. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
wn.com/Ipc Theft (S.378 382) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVII - OF OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY Of Theft
378. Theft —
Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.
Explanation 1 — A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being movable property, is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.
Explanation 2 — A moving effected by the same act which affects the severance may be a theft.
Explanation 3 — A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented it from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.
Explanation 4 — A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.
Explanation 5 —The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied, and may be given either by the person in possession, or by any person having for the purpose authority either express or implied.
(j) If A owes money to Z for repairing the watch, and if Z retains the watch lawfully as a security for the debt, and A takes the watch out of Z’s possession, with the intention of depriving Z of the property as a security for his debt, he commits theft, in as much as he takes it dishonestly.
(k) Again, if A, having pawned his watch to Z, takes it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent, not having paid what he borrowed on the watch, he commits theft, though the watch is his own property in as much as he takes it dishonestly.
(l) A takes an article belonging to Z out of Z’s possession, without Z’s consent, with the intention of keeping it until he obtains money from Z as a reward for its restoration. Here A takes dishonestly; A has therefore committed theft.
(m) A, being on friendly terms with Z, goes into Z’s library in Z’s absence, and takes away a book without Z’s express consent for the purpose merely of reading it, and with the intention of returning it. Here, it is probable that A may have
conceived that he had Z’s implied consent to use Z’s book. If this was A’s impression, A has not committed theft.
379. Punishment for theft —
Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
380. Theft in dwelling house, etc.—
381. Theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of master —
382. Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to the committing of the theft —
(a) A commits theft on property in Z’s possession; and, while committing this theft, he has a loaded pistol under his garment, having provided this pistol for the purpose of hurting Z in case Z should resist. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
- published: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 490
IPC Offences Relating to Marriage (S.493-498) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:11
- Updated: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 2
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XX - OF OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGE
493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of ...
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XX - OF OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGE
493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage —
Every man who by deceit causes any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
494. Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife —
Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
495. Same offence with concealment of former marriage from person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted
496. Marriage ceremony fraudulently gone through without lawful marriage —
497. Adultery —
Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. In such case the wife shall be punishable as an abettor.
498. Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman —
wn.com/Ipc Offences Relating To Marriage (S.493 498) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XX - OF OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGE
493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage —
Every man who by deceit causes any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
494. Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife —
Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
495. Same offence with concealment of former marriage from person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted
496. Marriage ceremony fraudulently gone through without lawful marriage —
497. Adultery —
Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. In such case the wife shall be punishable as an abettor.
498. Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman —
- published: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 2
IPC Hurt and Grevious (Hurt S.319-335) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:50
- Updated: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 0
In Hindi
Of Hurt
319. Hurt —
Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt.
320. Grievous hurt —
The following kinds of...
In Hindi
Of Hurt
319. Hurt —
Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt.
320. Grievous hurt —
The following kinds of hurt only are designated as "grievous": — First — Emasculation.
Secondly — Permanent privation of the sight of either eye. Thirdly — Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear, Fourthly — Privation of any member or joint.
Fifthly.— Destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint.
Sixthly — Permanent disfiguration of the head or face.
Seventhly — Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth.
Eighthly — Any hurt which endangers life or which causes the sufferer to be during the space of twenty days in severe bodily pain, or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits.
321. Voluntarily causing hurt —
322. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt —
Whoever voluntarily causes hurt, if the hurt which he intends to cause or knows himself to be likely to cause is grievous hurt, and if the hurt which he causes is grievous hurt, is said "voluntarily to cause grievous hurt."
Explanation —A person is not said voluntarily to cause grievous hurt except when he both causes grievous hurt and intends or knows himself to be likely to cause grievous hurt. But he is said voluntarily to cause grievous hurt, if intending or knowing himself to be likely to cause grievous hurt of one kind, he actually causes grievous hurt of another kind.
323. Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt —
324. Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means —
325. Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt —
326. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means—
327. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal act —
328. Causing hurt by means of poison, etc. with intent to commit an offence
329. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal act —
330. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property —
331. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property —
332. Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty —
333. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty —
334. Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation —
335. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt on provocation —
Whoever voluntarily causes grievous hurt on grave and sudden provocation, if he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause grievous hurt to any person other than the person who gave the provocation, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to four years, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both.
Explanation— The last two sections are subject to the same provisos as Explanation 1, section 300.
wn.com/Ipc Hurt And Grevious (Hurt S.319 335) Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi
Of Hurt
319. Hurt —
Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt.
320. Grievous hurt —
The following kinds of hurt only are designated as "grievous": — First — Emasculation.
Secondly — Permanent privation of the sight of either eye. Thirdly — Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear, Fourthly — Privation of any member or joint.
Fifthly.— Destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint.
Sixthly — Permanent disfiguration of the head or face.
Seventhly — Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth.
Eighthly — Any hurt which endangers life or which causes the sufferer to be during the space of twenty days in severe bodily pain, or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits.
321. Voluntarily causing hurt —
322. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt —
Whoever voluntarily causes hurt, if the hurt which he intends to cause or knows himself to be likely to cause is grievous hurt, and if the hurt which he causes is grievous hurt, is said "voluntarily to cause grievous hurt."
Explanation —A person is not said voluntarily to cause grievous hurt except when he both causes grievous hurt and intends or knows himself to be likely to cause grievous hurt. But he is said voluntarily to cause grievous hurt, if intending or knowing himself to be likely to cause grievous hurt of one kind, he actually causes grievous hurt of another kind.
323. Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt —
324. Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means —
325. Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt —
326. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means—
327. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal act —
328. Causing hurt by means of poison, etc. with intent to commit an offence
329. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal act —
330. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property —
331. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property —
332. Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty —
333. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty —
334. Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation —
335. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt on provocation —
Whoever voluntarily causes grievous hurt on grave and sudden provocation, if he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause grievous hurt to any person other than the person who gave the provocation, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to four years, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both.
Explanation— The last two sections are subject to the same provisos as Explanation 1, section 300.
- published: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 0
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
61:03
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
http://dkdubey.webs.com/
CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092...
published: 27 Sep 2012
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)
- published: 27 Sep 2012
- views: 44813
8:54
Indian Penal Code -Video 1
Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Jun...
published: 13 Mar 2014
author: Rakesh Kapoor
Indian Penal Code -Video 1
Indian Penal Code -Video 1
- published: 13 Mar 2014
- views: 936
-
author:
Rakesh Kapoor
Add Playlist for this Author
14:46
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY O...
published: 10 Sep 2014
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
28:33
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
CDs of whole IPC are available . Precious Lectures on IPC by PANKAJ Kr. TRIPATHI (Founde...
published: 10 Feb 2015
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)
- published: 10 Feb 2015
- views: 120
9:46
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation —
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended ...
published: 13 Sep 2014
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 690
6:05
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence —
Nothing is an offence...
published: 08 Sep 2014
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 08 Sep 2014
- views: 0
11:03
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 G...
published: 30 Aug 2014
author: Indian Law School
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 30 Aug 2014
- views: 15
-
author:
Indian Law School
Add Playlist for this Author
24:55
IPC part1
Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC)...
published: 14 Jan 2012
IPC part1
IPC part1
- published: 14 Jan 2012
- views: 27355
16:43
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I   Introduction...
published: 29 Aug 2014
author: Indian Law School
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 29 Aug 2014
- views: 4
-
author:
Indian Law School
Add Playlist for this Author
7:09
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
The law is drafted to safeguard the rights and freedom of all the individuals irrespective...
published: 11 Apr 2015
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misuse..
- published: 11 Apr 2015
- views: 25
9:12
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
Of Robbery and Dacoity
390. Robbery —
In all...
published: 12 Sep 2014
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 5
16:02
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
107. Abetment of a thing —
A person abets the doing ...
published: 09 Sep 2014
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 1
7:16
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
349. Force —
A person is said to u...
published: 11 Sep 2014
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 11 Sep 2014
- views: 6
3:14
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi
CHAPTER VA - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
120A. Definition of...
published: 09 Sep 2014
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Penal Code, 1860
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 0
INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)...
Indian Penal Code -Video 1...
IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.29...
IPC 1860 (Classification of the chapters)...
IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 18...
IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Pe...
IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Pen...
IPC part1...
IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860...
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and its Misu...
IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal...
IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 186...
IPC Criminal Force and Assault (S.349-358) : India...
IPC Criminal Conspiracy (S.120A, 120B) : Indian Pe...
IPC Criminal Breach of Trust (S.405-409) : Indian ...
IPC 1860,Indian Penal Code,Cr P C 1973,Evidence Ac...
IPC Dowry Death S 304B : Indian Penal Code, 1860...
IPC (S. 420) Cheating and inducing delivery of pro...
INDIAN PENAL CODE PART 2.1 (IPC) AT DELHI BY D K D...
Indian penal code section 498A || Voice Of Vanitha...
IPC Theft (S.378-382) : Indian Penal Code, 1860...
IPC Offences Relating to Marriage (S.493-498) : In...
IPC Hurt and Grevious (Hurt S.319-335) : Indian Pe...
photo: creative commons
Unprecedented Weather In United Kingdom, US Blamed on El Nino, Climate-Change Phenomenon
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Dec 2015
El Niño and climate change have provoked unprecedented weather phenomenon around the globe with flooding in the United Kingdom, an unusually warm winter in the Northeast United States and tornadoes and freakish snowstorms in the Southwest U.S., according to multiple media reports. According to a Monday Inquistr report, there were more than 200 flood alerts on Dec. 28 – including 20 life-threatening “severe warnings ... ....
photo: AP / Yorgos Karahalis
US Hails Iran Shipping Uranium To Russia In Compliance With Nuclear Accord
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Dec 2015photo: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
Spacecraft Cassini Bids Farewell To Saturn's Enceladus In Final, Remarkable Flyby
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Dec 2015
The Cassini spacecraft has finished its final flyby of Saturn’s mysterious icy moon Enceladus, according to IFL Science. After receiving streams of data over the weekend, NASA has showcased some of the most beautiful astrophotography taken by the probe. Passing at a distance of 4,999 kilometers (3,106 miles) from the surface of the moon, the final series of images reveals the world’s furrows and ridges in impeccable detail....
photo: WN / Rubielyn Bunag
Saudi Arabia Announces Record $98bn Budget Deficit, Cites Global Petroleum Prices
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Dec 2015
With a sharp drop in revenues attributed to rock-bottom global petroleum prices, the world’s leading oil producer Saudi Arabia has raised domestic energy prices by nearly 40 percent after announcing a record $98 billion budget deficit, Al Jazeera reported Monday ... "About 80-90 percent of (Saudi) government income comes from oil.” – Economist Walid Arab Hashem ... It is going to change," Hashem said....
photo: Creative Commons / Flickr upload bot
In a first, Russia closes Red Square for New Year's eve
Edit The Times of India 28 Dec 2015
MOSCOW. Moscow's Red Square, traditionally a place where people gather to ring in the New Year, will be closed to revellers on December 31, city authorities said, amid mounting security concerns ... Speaking to Kommersant radio former lawmaker Alexander Klyukin said the surprise move was "the same as closing off Times Square in New York." ... ....
« back to news headlines
Seven arrested for robbery at sales agency in Warje
Edit The Times of India 29 Dec 2015
PUNE. The Warje Malwadi police on Monday arrested a gang of seven men for allegedly robbing Rs 60,000 from a sales agency at the Anand Industrial Estate in Warje. The incident took place on December 24 ... The police have registered a case under section 395 (dacoity) of the Indian Penal Code. ....
Moral conviction has no place in law: Bombay HC
Edit The Times of India 29 Dec 2015
NAGPUR. Acquitting a Chandrapur man of charges under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POSCO) Act, 2012, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court ruled that "moral conviction has no place in law" ... After the FIR, the accused was put behind bars from July 5, 2013. Chandrapur additional sessions judge convicted him under sections 9 and 10 of the POSCO Act and Section 354-A of the Indian Penal Code on March 9 ... What HC said? ... ....
AIADMK lawyer files complaint against Vijayakanth for derogatory remarks against Jayalalithaa
Edit The Times of India 28 Dec 2015
CHENNAI ... The "uncivilised action and disrespectful utterances" of Vijayakanth attracted penal action under various sections of the Women (Prevention) Harassment Act and the Indian Penal Code, Selvakumar contended ... ....
8-year-old Dalit girl raped in Muzaffarnagar
Edit The Times of India 28 Dec 2015
MEERUT ... The accused has been arrested in the case ... The accused was booked under section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code along with relevant sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) ... ....
Judge's house trespasser sent in 2-day police remand
Edit The Times of India 28 Dec 2015
Chandigarh ... Nishan Lal of Zirakpur was apprehended by Krishan, the personal security officer of the judge, on Saturday night ... A case under sections 454 (trespassing) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was registered at Sector 19 police station. ....
Teenager held for blackmail after hacking woman’s account
Edit The Hindu 28 Dec 2015
5 lakh ... A case was registered under Section 385 (putting person in fear of injury in order to commit extortion) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 A (sending offensive messages through communication service) of the Information Technology Act on October 25. Based on a tip off, the police formed a special team to nab the juvenile ... ....
Elderly landlord sexually assaults four-year-old girl
Edit Deccan Herald 28 Dec 2015
He sends her brother out to throw garbage. A four-year-old girl was sexually assaulted allegedly by her 67-year-old landlord at a rented house in south Delhi’s Ambedkar Nagar on Saturday. The elderly landlord has been booked under Indian Penal Code and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and placed under arrested late in the evening ... ....
Attack on Dalits: two held, counter-case filed
Edit The Hindu 28 Dec 2015
Rathor told The Hindu ... Meanwhile, following a counter-complaint lodged by one of the accused, the Turvihal police filed another FIR on Sunday against Dalit victims Shivaputrappa and others under Sections 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means), 143 (unlawful assembly), 506 (criminal intimidation) and 504 (intentional insult and provocation for breaking public peace) of Indian Penal Code ... ....
Maharaj Yashveer arrested in Shamli mahapanchayat row
Edit The Times of India 28 Dec 2015
Meerut. BJP leader Maharaj Yashveer, who allegedly made controversial remarks against Prophet Mohammad at a mahapanchayat on Friday, was arrested in a joint operation by a Shamli police special weapons and tactics (SWAT) team and Muzaffarnagar police. Yashveer has been booked under section 153 A (promoting enmity between groups on grounds of religion) of the Indian Penal Code ... "I still stand by what I said at the mahapanchayat ... ....
Mercedes driver flaunts gun near Turkish embassy
Edit Deccan Herald 28 Dec 2015
Panic gripped a part of the diplomatic area when a Mercedes Benz owner threw up a fit and whipped out a revolver after a cab glazed past his costly car ... Hauz Khas-resident Aman Verma was arrested at the spot, police said on Sunday ... Five cartridges were also recovered from his possession ... A case under Indian Penal Code and Arms Act has been registered with Chanakyapuri police station ... ....
Bapu Surat Singh Khalsa on Hunger Strike to Free Sikh Political Prisoners
Edit Huffington Post 28 Dec 2015
citizen), was arrested for simply taking care of his father while on hunger strike and held under penal code sections 107 and 151, "apprehension of breach of peace and tranquility of an area" and "arrest to prevent the commission of cognizable offences" ... However, section 57 of the Indian Penal Code defines life imprisonment as 20 years, or in some cases, less (Singh, 2015)....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next page »
