Needed: Voting Security and Election Results Credibility
One of Marian's Fundamental Four |
No Leaky Buckets !
(and no SPAM from us) --- |
Have Paper | Use the Paper | Stand-Alone Machines | Nothing Else Amiss Essential: -- "hacopaba" --
write me at fix-a-leak@noleakybuckets.org # SARA: Secure, Accessible, Recountable and Accurate # hand counted paper ballots - ha-co-pa-ba
Read about our local Elections Integrity group "Whatcom Fair Voting". Bev Harris wrote about containers that don't even leak!: "...Using voter databases with data that is constantly "in flux" is like passing around squishy water balloons. Contents will tend to shift depending on who's holding them at any given moment...." source: BBV About a serious non-elections issue" COAL-Free-Bellingham And about my friend Rev. Barbara Gilday. SPAM disclaimer note: Someone has been fraudulently sending SPAM messages illegally using email addresses of "______-at-noleakybuckets.org". We object to this fraudulent misuse of the domain name, but there is little that can be done. |
(click for old news) How does the Whatcom County elections office work? It's been a while since we posted anything new here. There is a very good reason for this -- our elections system in Whatcom County, WA, has been working very well. The County mails out the ballots to each voter. The voters mark their ballots at their leisure, at home or wherever, then return them either by mail, or in an official dropbox. There are about a dozen drop-boxes, so doing that is also easy. As the ballots arrive in the Auditors' Office (the agency which runs our elections), they are meticulously cared for, and stored until the counting can start. Watch this spot - in a few days we will post a decription of how the management of the ballots, and the votes, is done, and upholds a high standard of integrity. Here is a little teaser -- they allow ordinary citizens to be in the rooms where the ballots are being processed! Monopoly by one Machine Vendor? - still on the table Shall one vendor be allowed to control three-quarters of the US elections-equipment market? No! The US legal system (Attorney General) must take action under anti-trust law, to stop this merger. Or, at minimum, set rules for oversight of the operations. Article in the NY Times: here. Monopoly by one Machine Vendor? We wish to bring attention to a serious risk to our US society, which is right now in play. Public and trustworthy elections are essential to maintenance of our democracy. But counting votes in secret, in ways that are difficult or impossible to review and verify by the public, does not lead to that. And having our elections system essentially operated by a single business, is intolerable. Right now, announced just a few days ago, there is an attempt by one vendor of automated elections equipment, ES&S;, to buy up their next-biggest competitor, Diebold's Premier Election Solutions. If that happens, three-fourths of the jurisdictions in the US would have their elections operated by a single private business! The citizen watchdog organization Black Box Voting: ".... is writing to express our objection to, and to request your investigation of, the proposed acquisition of Diebold's Premier Election Solutions by Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S;)...." See: (webpage) (document) We ask that US voters everywhere join in making this concern public, and assisting in whatever way possible the prohibition of the merger of these two voting-machine giants into a single entity, which would have unprecedented and unacceptable power. "....This acquisition, in addition to overconcentrating the industry, will put a single company in a position to shut down federal elections at will. Thus, this overconcentration also creates a potential national security problem. ...." Thank you for your concern with me on this serious issue. - We judge that the seriousness overrides the usual guidelines due to it's effect on the fundamentals of our democracy. For years, we have believed that:----- "If you cannot trust the way your votes are counted, nothing much else in politics matters!" - Marian Beddill, 2003 Shall one vendor be allowed to control three-quarters of the US elections-equipment market? No! Ballot Secrecy = Democracy Lawsuit to protect the secrecy of the ballot! White-vs-Reed was in the WA State Supreme Court. News Story - Politics Blog The lawsuit claims that the present system, sold by HART and called by them the "Ballot-Tracker" (Google-it) puts a code on each ballot which identifies the voter who cast it. With that, the secrecy of the ballot is lost. If the identity of all those who voted one way is known to the insiders, democracy is at serious risk of being lost. New Bill by US Rep. Rush Holt (Update June 24th, 2009) Holt's newest new bill still fails. The bill is currently known as "The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2009 (HR 2894) Analysis of HR 2894 by Bev Harris of BBV; Conclusion: Do Not Pass With citations from and by: http://www.OpenVotingConsortium.org/ad/hr2894.pdf ; http://www.votersunite.org/info/2009HoltBillTimeline.pdf ; DEMOCRACY FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE / ELECTION DEFENSE ALLIANCE ; http://www.opednews.com/articles/2009-Holt-Bill-E-Voting--by-Nancy-Tobi-090329-8 32.html ; "ban-touchscreen-voting" More info on stopping Internet voting The voteraction.org website has a page dedicated to news updates on activities about Internet voting - with the purpose of avoiding it because of the serious problems such systems would have. track-internet-voting-legislation From Brazil - Election Fraud and Technology A new article about election fraud, by a Brazilian leader in elections integrity. The officials are moving to install fingerprint voter-ID technology on the DRE's to reduce one form of fraud, while other ways are ignored. by Amilcar Brunazo Filho click here |