- published: 24 Oct 2016
- views: 124
Relevance logic, also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. (It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by Australian logicians, and relevance logic by other English-speaking logicians.)
Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-functional logic, namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implication. This idea is not new: C. I. Lewis was led to invent modal logic, and specifically strict implication, on the grounds that classical logic grants paradoxes of material implication such as the principle that a falsehood implies any proposition. Hence "if I'm a donkey, then two and two is four" is true when translated as a material implication, yet it seems intuitively false since a true implication must tie the antecedent and consequent together by some notion of relevance. And whether or not I'm a donkey seems in no way relevant to whether two and two is four.
Crash Course (also known as Driving Academy) is a 1988 made for television teen film directed by Oz Scott.
Crash Course centers on a group of high schoolers in a driver’s education class; many for the second or third time. The recently divorced teacher, super-passive Larry Pearl, is on thin ice with the football fanatic principal, Principal Paulson, who is being pressured by the district superintendent to raise driver’s education completion rates or lose his coveted football program. With this in mind, Principal Paulson and his assistant, with a secret desire for his job, Abner Frasier, hire an outside driver’s education instructor with a very tough reputation, Edna Savage, aka E.W. Savage, who quickly takes control of the class.
The plot focuses mostly on the students and their interactions with their teachers and each other. In the beginning, Rico is the loner with just a few friends, Chadley is the bookish nerd with few friends who longs to be cool and also longs to be a part of Vanessa’s life who is the young, friendly and attractive girl who had to fake her mother’s signature on her driver’s education permission slip. Kichi is the hip-hop Asian kid who often raps what he has to say and constantly flirts with Maria, the rich foreign girl who thinks that the right-of-way on the roadways always goes to (insert awesomely fake foreign Latino accent) “my father’s limo”. Finally you have stereotypical football meathead J.J., who needs to pass his English exam to keep his eligibility and constantly asks out and gets rejected by Alice, the tomboy whose father owns “Santini & Son” Concrete Company. Alice is portrayed as being the “son” her father wanted.
Mathematical logic is a subfield of mathematics exploring the applications of formal logic to mathematics. It bears close connections to metamathematics, the foundations of mathematics, and theoretical computer science. The unifying themes in mathematical logic include the study of the expressive power of formal systems and the deductive power of formal proof systems.
Mathematical logic is often divided into the fields of set theory, model theory, recursion theory, and proof theory. These areas share basic results on logic, particularly first-order logic, and definability. In computer science (particularly in the ACM Classification) mathematical logic encompasses additional topics not detailed in this article; see Logic in computer science for those.
Since its inception, mathematical logic has both contributed to, and has been motivated by, the study of foundations of mathematics. This study began in the late 19th century with the development of axiomatic frameworks for geometry, arithmetic, and analysis. In the early 20th century it was shaped by David Hilbert's program to prove the consistency of foundational theories. Results of Kurt Gödel, Gerhard Gentzen, and others provided partial resolution to the program, and clarified the issues involved in proving consistency. Work in set theory showed that almost all ordinary mathematics can be formalized in terms of sets, although there are some theorems that cannot be proven in common axiom systems for set theory. Contemporary work in the foundations of mathematics often focuses on establishing which parts of mathematics can be formalized in particular formal systems (as in reverse mathematics) rather than trying to find theories in which all of mathematics can be developed.
What is RELEVANCE LOGIC? What does RELEVANCE LOGIC mean? RELEVANCE LOGIC meaning & explanation
Michael Dunn "Arrow logic, relevance logic, and relation algebras"
A Crash Course in Formal Logic Pt 4a-b Fallacies of Relevance
Evidence: Logical Relevance
Relevance & Logic
Iszoloscope ~ Relevance Outside Logic
A Crash Course in Formal Logic Pt. 1
Relevance of Logic
3.2 Fallacies Of Relevance Part 2
A Crash Course in Formal Logic Pt 6a: Categorical Syllogisms, Terms, Mood and Figure
What is RELEVANCE LOGIC? What does RELEVANCE LOGIC mean? RELEVANCE LOGIC meaning & explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. Relevance logic, also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. (It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by Australian logicians, and relevance logic by other English-speaking logicians.) Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-functional logic, namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implic...
Computational Logic: A 70th Birthday Celebration Honoring Melvin Fitting
In this first of three videos on fallacies I discuss Fallacies of Relevance including the appeal to force, pity and others. I also explain the distinction between formal and informal fallacies.
Produced by the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law
Album : False Vacuum [2016] https://mailorder.ant-zen.com/product/id/2775 https://www.discogs.com/Iszoloscope-False-Vacuum/release/7863675 http://www.iszoloscope.net/main.html https://www.facebook.com/iszoloscope/ This is for promotional use only. I don't have any rights for the music and I'll remove it immediately if the copyright holder request it. Buy the artist's cd's and support them at their live performances.
This first video in a series on logic covers topics such as arguments, statementhood, inferences, premises and conclusions as well as the distinction between arguments and non-arguments.
FOLLOW US: https://www.facebook.com/mathswithjacob USEFUL FILES TO COMPLEMENT VIDEOS: Click on the following link to access PDF files listing all the videos on my channel. Each listed video has its own link for quick and easy access. http://bit.ly/2sOAL7N This video looks at how logic is important in real life.
I give an overview here of the various components and features of the categorical syllogism. Most helpful, I give a memory trick for recalling which moods and figures of the standard form categorical syllogism are valid.
What is RELEVANCE LOGIC? What does RELEVANCE LOGIC mean? RELEVANCE LOGIC meaning & explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. Relevance logic, also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. (It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by Australian logicians, and relevance logic by other English-speaking logicians.) Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-functional logic, namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implic...
Computational Logic: A 70th Birthday Celebration Honoring Melvin Fitting
In this first of three videos on fallacies I discuss Fallacies of Relevance including the appeal to force, pity and others. I also explain the distinction between formal and informal fallacies.
Produced by the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law
Album : False Vacuum [2016] https://mailorder.ant-zen.com/product/id/2775 https://www.discogs.com/Iszoloscope-False-Vacuum/release/7863675 http://www.iszoloscope.net/main.html https://www.facebook.com/iszoloscope/ This is for promotional use only. I don't have any rights for the music and I'll remove it immediately if the copyright holder request it. Buy the artist's cd's and support them at their live performances.
This first video in a series on logic covers topics such as arguments, statementhood, inferences, premises and conclusions as well as the distinction between arguments and non-arguments.
FOLLOW US: https://www.facebook.com/mathswithjacob USEFUL FILES TO COMPLEMENT VIDEOS: Click on the following link to access PDF files listing all the videos on my channel. Each listed video has its own link for quick and easy access. http://bit.ly/2sOAL7N This video looks at how logic is important in real life.
I give an overview here of the various components and features of the categorical syllogism. Most helpful, I give a memory trick for recalling which moods and figures of the standard form categorical syllogism are valid.
Computational Logic: A 70th Birthday Celebration Honoring Melvin Fitting
In this first of three videos on fallacies I discuss Fallacies of Relevance including the appeal to force, pity and others. I also explain the distinction between formal and informal fallacies.
This video tries to expose some of the very serious logical weaknesses that we currently have in pure mathematics. These center around historical problems with the continuum, analysis and set theory, but increasingly are coming to view with the growing power and relevance of computational thinking. My research papers can be found at my Research Gate page, at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/.... I also have a blog at http://njwildberger.com/, where I will discuss lots of foundational issues, along with other things, and you can check out my webpages at http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~norman/. Of course if you want to support all these bold initiatives, become a Patron of this Channel at https://www.patreon.com/njwildberger?... .
These are video lectures that I recorded for my online Introduction to Philosophy Student. Furthermore, the chapters in these video lectures correspond to the chapters in A Concise Introduction to Logic, 12th edition, by Patrick Hurley (Cengage Learning). Finally, some of the information provided in these lectures are also provided in Logic, 2nd edition, by Stan Baronett (OUP).
Presented Oct. 9, 2013, in the Info-Metrics Seminar Series at American University in Washington, DC. http://www.american.edu/cas/economics/info-metrics/ Abstract: The development of the concept of information is traced from Plato to the Port-Royal Logic, on through Mill, Boole, Frege, Carnap, Bar-Hillel, Montague, Kripke, Shannon, and I relate it to algebraic representations of Stone, Priestley, myself, and others. I finish by introducing the concept of an information frame, generalizing the Routley-Meyer ternary frame semantics for relevance logic, and show how it can be employed to model the static and dynamic aspects of information (information as data, information as program) and hence model combinatory logic, relation algebras, and some other logics of interest to computer science....
This first video in a series on logic covers topics such as arguments, statementhood, inferences, premises and conclusions as well as the distinction between arguments and non-arguments.
Talk delivered by Graham Priest at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, on March 20, 2015.
ALL PRAISES, ALL HEAVINESS AND ALL POWER TO MY FATHER YAHAWAH IN THE NAME OF MY LORD AND SAVIOR, THE ANOINTED ONE YAHAWASHI I asked, and HE allowed me to find these things and opened my eyes so I could see and understand at least a little, even if not perfectly. To know just enough so I would flee from the evil, to run away from the angel in the path with the sword drawn, ready to destroy the prophet. Prove All Things: A Study In Grammar, Logic, And Rhetoric An "over the shoulder" study of 1 Thessalonians 5:21 and how it relates to Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric. Text variants used for the Greek include: Nestle 1904 (interlinear biblehub.com) Schrivener’s Textus Receptus 1896 (interlinear - "theWord" pc software) I am not some sort of scholar. I have no letters behind my name in this wo...
Here I cover "fallacies galore," basically a host of fallacies that do not fall under the categories of fallacies of relevance or of weak induction. They include begging the question, false dilemma, equivocation, amphiboly and composition/division among others.