-
What is Trident? Britain's nuclear deterrent explained
As political parties clash over Trident's renewal, we examine Britain's current nuclear capabilities
Get the latest headlines http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Subscribe to The Telegraph http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=telegraphtv
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/telegraph.co.uk
Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/telegraph
Follow us on Google+ https://plus.google
-
Yes, Prime Minister: Nuclear Deterrent- Scrapping Trident
A discussion between Jim Hacker and Humphrey Appleby.
-
Should Britain Keep its Nuclear Weapons? - Philosophy Tube
Trident will have to renewed or scrapped soon, so is Mutually Assured Destruction the way forward, or is it time to ban the bomb?
Politics Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvoAL-KSZ32fs6KX9IqqZY_0D4YXggcBN
The Nuclear Information Service: http://www.nuclearinfo.org
@nuclearinfo
facebook.com/nuclearinfo
youtube.com/user/Nuclearinfo
Subscribe! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_ce
-
Yes Prime Minister, Discussing Trident
Sir Humphrey tries to convince Prime Minister Jim Hacker that he must buy Trident because Britain needs the best nuclear deterrent available because the Soviets can't certainly know that Hacker probably knows that they probably certainly know...
-
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
The chief scientific advisor discusses neuclear weapons with Prime Minister Jim Hacker.
-
Yes Prime Minister - Nuclear Deterrent
-
Major General Patrick Cordingley on Trident – ‘We Don’t Need Nuclear Weapons’
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. Major General Patrick Cordingley Commander of the Desert Rats in the first Gulf War and author of Number one bestseller ‘In the Eye of the Storm’ questions why are we forking out a hundred billion for Trident’s weapons of mass destruction? And does the UK really control the outdated nuclear weapons system that the taxpayer is paying for? Plus why are we
-
Royal Navy Test Launches Trident II Nuclear SLBM [HD]
The Royal Navy Vanguard class SSBN, HMS Vigilant, successfully test launches a UGM-133 Trident II nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missile.
The Vanguard class has a capacity to carry up to 16 Trident II SLBMs. UK Trident II's are equipped with UK-produced warheads, designed and manufactured by Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston and Burghfield, UK.
Video released by the Royal N
-
Fresh Calls to Renew Britain's Trident Nuclear Deterrent 01.07.14
An influential group of public figures is urging the government to press ahead with renewing Britain's Trident nuclear weapons.
Foreign policy thinktank, The British American Security Information Council, had asked a Commission of eight foreign policy figures to investigate the options for the country's nuclear arsenal.
-
Can the UK go without a nuclear deterrent based on Trident?
http://www.rusi.org/ukponi Franklin Miller and Dr Nick Ritchie debate the future of the UK's continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrence policy, held at RUSI's UK PONI Annual Conference 2011
-
Trident nukes whistleblower: Weapons access easier than 'most nightclubs'
The Royal Navy has launched an investigation into whistleblower William McNeilly, who exposed horrid security lapses in UK’s Trident nuclear program. READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/99vf0v
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air
Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=RussiaToday
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Foll
-
UK's Cameron says Trident needed as nuclear deterrent
http://www.euronews.com/ British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned that scrapping Trident, the UK's submarine-based nuclear weapons system, would be "foolish" in the face of North Korea's escalating war rhetoric.
In an article written by Cameron for the Daily Telegraph, he stressed the importance of retaining Trident as a deterrent against possible attacks.
Around the world, global leader
-
Costs for UK nuclear deterrent Trident continues to spiral
The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. The cost of replacing the Trident submarines is set to rise to 41 billion pounds. The government previously stated four new submarines would cost 25 billion pounds. This brings the total figure for replacing the aging system to just under 2
-
Trident nuclear deterrent test footage
-
UK PM pushes nuclear 'deterrent' in face of N. Korea threat
Prime Minister David Cameron has said it would be 'foolish' for Britain to renounce its nuclear program in the face of threats from North Korea and Iran. His call to arms comes despite harsh criticism that Trident is too costly and unnecessary.
British Prime Minister Cameron stated that the UK needs an "ultimate weapon" to combat the growing threat of nuclear attack which he said had "increased"
-
Footage of the unarmed Trident II (D5) ballistic missile being fired (P1)
DEFENCE SECRETARY ANNOUNCES FURTHER £350M FOR SUCCESSOR SUBMARINES
The Defence Secretary will today (Monday) announce an additional £350M worth of funding for the next stage of design work for Successor, the future generation of UK nuclear-armed submarines.
This investment will sustain 1,200 UK jobs and makes clear the Government's firm commitment to maintaining continuous at sea deterrence for
-
UK should retain and renew Trident nuclear deterrent, review finds
Trident Commission said UK should retain and deploy nuclear arsenal for reasons of national security and responsibilities to Nato.
-
Corbyn: I'm prepared to live with decision to renew Trident
Jeremy Corbyn has told ITV News he would "live with" Trident "somehow" if Labour voted to renew Britain's nuclear deterrent: http://bit.ly/1haFUiK
Subscribe for more from the ITV News: http://bit.ly/1KMJ3gG
-
Julian Huppert - Better Ways to Spend Cash Than Renewing Trident Nuclear Deterrent
Interviewed on the Daily Politics on BBC2 on Monday 29 October 2012.
-
UpFront - Hans Blix backs Corbyn's call to scrap UK's Trident
Jeremy Corbyn, UK's opposition Labour party leader, has called to scrap Britain's independent nuclear deterrent programme, Trident, angering many within his own party and prompting critics to question the effect it would have on the country’s national security.
In this web extra, Hans Blix, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supports Corbyn's call, saying Trident is
-
Peter Hitchens Discusses Trident on LBC (Jan 2016)
Peter Discusses Great Big Nuclear Willies on LBC.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/colossal-pointless-toy-peter-hitchens-lets-rip-at-trident--123315
-
Trident nuclear weapons 'in UK's national interest'
Trident nuclear weapons 'in UK's national interest'
It is in the UK's national interest to keep the Trident nuclear weapons system, a group of former ministers, diplomats and generals have argued.
Maintaining a nuclear capability could help deter threats to the UK's security in future, the report by The Trident Commission concluded.
But they said continuous patrols could be relaxed while the UK
-
Hilary Benn Britain needs to maintain an independent nuclear deterrent
The shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn discusses whether Labour would support any move to scrap Trident, the UK’s nuclear weapons defence system, or withdraw from Nato. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Benn says that while he shares Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s desire to see a world free of nuclear weapons, he doesn’t believe other nuclear states would follow Britain’s lead in
What is Trident? Britain's nuclear deterrent explained
As political parties clash over Trident's renewal, we examine Britain's current nuclear capabilities
Get the latest headlines http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Sub...
As political parties clash over Trident's renewal, we examine Britain's current nuclear capabilities
Get the latest headlines http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Subscribe to The Telegraph http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=telegraphtv
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/telegraph.co.uk
Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/telegraph
Follow us on Google+ https://plus.google.com/102891355072777008500/
Telegraph.co.uk and YouTube.com/TelegraphTV are websites of The Daily Telegraph, the UK's best-selling quality daily newspaper providing news and analysis on UK and world events, business, sport, lifestyle and culture.
wn.com/What Is Trident Britain's Nuclear Deterrent Explained
As political parties clash over Trident's renewal, we examine Britain's current nuclear capabilities
Get the latest headlines http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Subscribe to The Telegraph http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=telegraphtv
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/telegraph.co.uk
Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/telegraph
Follow us on Google+ https://plus.google.com/102891355072777008500/
Telegraph.co.uk and YouTube.com/TelegraphTV are websites of The Daily Telegraph, the UK's best-selling quality daily newspaper providing news and analysis on UK and world events, business, sport, lifestyle and culture.
- published: 09 Apr 2015
- views: 5053
Yes, Prime Minister: Nuclear Deterrent- Scrapping Trident
A discussion between Jim Hacker and Humphrey Appleby....
A discussion between Jim Hacker and Humphrey Appleby.
wn.com/Yes, Prime Minister Nuclear Deterrent Scrapping Trident
A discussion between Jim Hacker and Humphrey Appleby.
- published: 27 Sep 2011
- views: 25077
Should Britain Keep its Nuclear Weapons? - Philosophy Tube
Trident will have to renewed or scrapped soon, so is Mutually Assured Destruction the way forward, or is it time to ban the bomb?
Politics Playlist: https://www...
Trident will have to renewed or scrapped soon, so is Mutually Assured Destruction the way forward, or is it time to ban the bomb?
Politics Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvoAL-KSZ32fs6KX9IqqZY_0D4YXggcBN
The Nuclear Information Service: http://www.nuclearinfo.org
@nuclearinfo
facebook.com/nuclearinfo
youtube.com/user/Nuclearinfo
Subscribe! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thephilosophytube
Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/PhilosophyTube
FAQ: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosophyTube/posts/460163027465168
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosophyTube?ref=hl
Twitter: @PhilosophyTube
Email: ollysphilosophychannel@gmail.com
Google+: google.com/+thephilosophytube
realphilosophytube.tumblr.com
Suggested Reading:
Jonathan Glover, “Causing Death and Saving Lives”
If you or your organisation would like to financially support Philosophy Tube in distributing philosophical knowledge to those who might not otherwise have access to it in exchange for credits on the show, please get in touch!
Music: ‘Black Fog,’ ‘Space Fighter Loop,’ and 'Latin Industries' by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Assets:
Title Animation by Amitai Angor AA VFX - https://www.youtube.com/dvdangor2011
Mushroom Cloud over Hiroshima: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
Fictional Country map by Skybase: http://tinyurl.com/pem43uc
Putin Smiling: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
Any copyrighted material should fall under fair use for educational purposes or commentary, but if you are a copyright holder and believe your material has been used unfairly please get in touch with us and we will be happy to discuss it.
wn.com/Should Britain Keep Its Nuclear Weapons Philosophy Tube
Trident will have to renewed or scrapped soon, so is Mutually Assured Destruction the way forward, or is it time to ban the bomb?
Politics Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvoAL-KSZ32fs6KX9IqqZY_0D4YXggcBN
The Nuclear Information Service: http://www.nuclearinfo.org
@nuclearinfo
facebook.com/nuclearinfo
youtube.com/user/Nuclearinfo
Subscribe! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thephilosophytube
Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/PhilosophyTube
FAQ: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosophyTube/posts/460163027465168
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosophyTube?ref=hl
Twitter: @PhilosophyTube
Email: ollysphilosophychannel@gmail.com
Google+: google.com/+thephilosophytube
realphilosophytube.tumblr.com
Suggested Reading:
Jonathan Glover, “Causing Death and Saving Lives”
If you or your organisation would like to financially support Philosophy Tube in distributing philosophical knowledge to those who might not otherwise have access to it in exchange for credits on the show, please get in touch!
Music: ‘Black Fog,’ ‘Space Fighter Loop,’ and 'Latin Industries' by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Assets:
Title Animation by Amitai Angor AA VFX - https://www.youtube.com/dvdangor2011
Mushroom Cloud over Hiroshima: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
Fictional Country map by Skybase: http://tinyurl.com/pem43uc
Putin Smiling: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
Any copyrighted material should fall under fair use for educational purposes or commentary, but if you are a copyright holder and believe your material has been used unfairly please get in touch with us and we will be happy to discuss it.
- published: 22 May 2015
- views: 11067
Yes Prime Minister, Discussing Trident
Sir Humphrey tries to convince Prime Minister Jim Hacker that he must buy Trident because Britain needs the best nuclear deterrent available because the Soviets...
Sir Humphrey tries to convince Prime Minister Jim Hacker that he must buy Trident because Britain needs the best nuclear deterrent available because the Soviets can't certainly know that Hacker probably knows that they probably certainly know...
wn.com/Yes Prime Minister, Discussing Trident
Sir Humphrey tries to convince Prime Minister Jim Hacker that he must buy Trident because Britain needs the best nuclear deterrent available because the Soviets can't certainly know that Hacker probably knows that they probably certainly know...
- published: 03 Nov 2012
- views: 119372
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
The chief scientific advisor discusses neuclear weapons with Prime Minister Jim Hacker....
The chief scientific advisor discusses neuclear weapons with Prime Minister Jim Hacker.
wn.com/Yes, Prime Minister Nuclear Deterrent
The chief scientific advisor discusses neuclear weapons with Prime Minister Jim Hacker.
- published: 05 Jan 2008
- views: 374052
Major General Patrick Cordingley on Trident – ‘We Don’t Need Nuclear Weapons’
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. Major General Patrick Cordingley Commander of the Desert Rats in the first Gulf War and author of Number one bestse...
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. Major General Patrick Cordingley Commander of the Desert Rats in the first Gulf War and author of Number one bestseller ‘In the Eye of the Storm’ questions why are we forking out a hundred billion for Trident’s weapons of mass destruction? And does the UK really control the outdated nuclear weapons system that the taxpayer is paying for? Plus why are we spending money on nuclear weapons ‘that have not military use’ when our armed forces are so overstretched.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
wn.com/Major General Patrick Cordingley On Trident – ‘We Don’T Need Nuclear Weapons’
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. Major General Patrick Cordingley Commander of the Desert Rats in the first Gulf War and author of Number one bestseller ‘In the Eye of the Storm’ questions why are we forking out a hundred billion for Trident’s weapons of mass destruction? And does the UK really control the outdated nuclear weapons system that the taxpayer is paying for? Plus why are we spending money on nuclear weapons ‘that have not military use’ when our armed forces are so overstretched.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
- published: 13 Jul 2015
- views: 1088
Royal Navy Test Launches Trident II Nuclear SLBM [HD]
The Royal Navy Vanguard class SSBN, HMS Vigilant, successfully test launches a UGM-133 Trident II nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missile.
The Vanguard cl...
The Royal Navy Vanguard class SSBN, HMS Vigilant, successfully test launches a UGM-133 Trident II nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missile.
The Vanguard class has a capacity to carry up to 16 Trident II SLBMs. UK Trident II's are equipped with UK-produced warheads, designed and manufactured by Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston and Burghfield, UK.
Video released by the Royal Navy
Follow us on Twitter for all the latest on UK defence and security:
http://bit.ly/1IKVCsO
You can also join the new UK Defence Forum for more in-depth UK defence discussion:
http://t.co/BitbUtZh68
wn.com/Royal Navy Test Launches Trident Ii Nuclear Slbm Hd
The Royal Navy Vanguard class SSBN, HMS Vigilant, successfully test launches a UGM-133 Trident II nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missile.
The Vanguard class has a capacity to carry up to 16 Trident II SLBMs. UK Trident II's are equipped with UK-produced warheads, designed and manufactured by Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston and Burghfield, UK.
Video released by the Royal Navy
Follow us on Twitter for all the latest on UK defence and security:
http://bit.ly/1IKVCsO
You can also join the new UK Defence Forum for more in-depth UK defence discussion:
http://t.co/BitbUtZh68
- published: 29 Oct 2012
- views: 412676
Fresh Calls to Renew Britain's Trident Nuclear Deterrent 01.07.14
An influential group of public figures is urging the government to press ahead with renewing Britain's Trident nuclear weapons.
Foreign policy thinktank, The B...
An influential group of public figures is urging the government to press ahead with renewing Britain's Trident nuclear weapons.
Foreign policy thinktank, The British American Security Information Council, had asked a Commission of eight foreign policy figures to investigate the options for the country's nuclear arsenal.
wn.com/Fresh Calls To Renew Britain's Trident Nuclear Deterrent 01.07.14
An influential group of public figures is urging the government to press ahead with renewing Britain's Trident nuclear weapons.
Foreign policy thinktank, The British American Security Information Council, had asked a Commission of eight foreign policy figures to investigate the options for the country's nuclear arsenal.
- published: 01 Jul 2014
- views: 491
Can the UK go without a nuclear deterrent based on Trident?
http://www.rusi.org/ukponi Franklin Miller and Dr Nick Ritchie debate the future of the UK's continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrence policy, held at RUSI's UK PON...
http://www.rusi.org/ukponi Franklin Miller and Dr Nick Ritchie debate the future of the UK's continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrence policy, held at RUSI's UK PONI Annual Conference 2011
wn.com/Can The UK Go Without A Nuclear Deterrent Based On Trident
http://www.rusi.org/ukponi Franklin Miller and Dr Nick Ritchie debate the future of the UK's continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrence policy, held at RUSI's UK PONI Annual Conference 2011
- published: 28 Jul 2011
- views: 989
Trident nukes whistleblower: Weapons access easier than 'most nightclubs'
The Royal Navy has launched an investigation into whistleblower William McNeilly, who exposed horrid security lapses in UK’s Trident nuclear program. READ MORE:...
The Royal Navy has launched an investigation into whistleblower William McNeilly, who exposed horrid security lapses in UK’s Trident nuclear program. READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/99vf0v
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air
Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=RussiaToday
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT
Listen to us on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/rttv
RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.
wn.com/Trident Nukes Whistleblower Weapons Access Easier Than 'Most Nightclubs'
The Royal Navy has launched an investigation into whistleblower William McNeilly, who exposed horrid security lapses in UK’s Trident nuclear program. READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/99vf0v
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air
Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=RussiaToday
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT
Listen to us on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/rttv
RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.
- published: 18 May 2015
- views: 14306
UK's Cameron says Trident needed as nuclear deterrent
http://www.euronews.com/ British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned that scrapping Trident, the UK's submarine-based nuclear weapons system, would be "fool...
http://www.euronews.com/ British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned that scrapping Trident, the UK's submarine-based nuclear weapons system, would be "foolish" in the face of North Korea's escalating war rhetoric.
In an article written by Cameron for the Daily Telegraph, he stressed the importance of retaining Trident as a deterrent against possible attacks.
Around the world, global leaders are assessing the potential threat posed by Kim Jong-Un's regime. The North Korean army says it has received final approval to launch a strike on the United States.
The US has announced plans to send a missile defence shield to Guam, following reports by South Korean intelligence that North Korea has positioned a mid-range missile that puts South Korea and Guam in range.
US Secretary of Defence Chuck Hegel said: "As they have ratcheted up their dangerous rhetoric and some of the actions they have taken over the last few weeks present a real and clear danger."
Find us on:
Youtube http://bit.ly/zr3upY
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/euronews.fans
Twitter http://twitter.com/euronews
wn.com/Uk's Cameron Says Trident Needed As Nuclear Deterrent
http://www.euronews.com/ British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned that scrapping Trident, the UK's submarine-based nuclear weapons system, would be "foolish" in the face of North Korea's escalating war rhetoric.
In an article written by Cameron for the Daily Telegraph, he stressed the importance of retaining Trident as a deterrent against possible attacks.
Around the world, global leaders are assessing the potential threat posed by Kim Jong-Un's regime. The North Korean army says it has received final approval to launch a strike on the United States.
The US has announced plans to send a missile defence shield to Guam, following reports by South Korean intelligence that North Korea has positioned a mid-range missile that puts South Korea and Guam in range.
US Secretary of Defence Chuck Hegel said: "As they have ratcheted up their dangerous rhetoric and some of the actions they have taken over the last few weeks present a real and clear danger."
Find us on:
Youtube http://bit.ly/zr3upY
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/euronews.fans
Twitter http://twitter.com/euronews
- published: 04 Apr 2013
- views: 969
Costs for UK nuclear deterrent Trident continues to spiral
The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. ...
The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. The cost of replacing the Trident submarines is set to rise to 41 billion pounds. The government previously stated four new submarines would cost 25 billion pounds. This brings the total figure for replacing the aging system to just under 200 billion pounds.
Live @ http://www.presstv.ir/live.html
Twitter @ http://twitter.com/PressTV
LiveLeak @ http://www.liveleak.com/c/PressTV
Facebook @ http://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV
Google+ @ http://plus.google.com/+VideosPTV
Instagram @ http://instagram.com/presstvchannel
SoundCloud@ https://soundcloud.com/videosptv
wn.com/Costs For UK Nuclear Deterrent Trident Continues To Spiral
The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. The cost of replacing the Trident submarines is set to rise to 41 billion pounds. The government previously stated four new submarines would cost 25 billion pounds. This brings the total figure for replacing the aging system to just under 200 billion pounds.
Live @ http://www.presstv.ir/live.html
Twitter @ http://twitter.com/PressTV
LiveLeak @ http://www.liveleak.com/c/PressTV
Facebook @ http://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV
Google+ @ http://plus.google.com/+VideosPTV
Instagram @ http://instagram.com/presstvchannel
SoundCloud@ https://soundcloud.com/videosptv
- published: 25 Nov 2015
- views: 105
UK PM pushes nuclear 'deterrent' in face of N. Korea threat
Prime Minister David Cameron has said it would be 'foolish' for Britain to renounce its nuclear program in the face of threats from North Korea and Iran. His ca...
Prime Minister David Cameron has said it would be 'foolish' for Britain to renounce its nuclear program in the face of threats from North Korea and Iran. His call to arms comes despite harsh criticism that Trident is too costly and unnecessary.
British Prime Minister Cameron stated that the UK needs an "ultimate weapon" to combat the growing threat of nuclear attack which he said had "increased" since the end of the Cold War.
Writing in UK newspaper the Daily Telegraph, Cameron promoted the US$150 billion Trident program to overhaul Britain's nuclear defenses. In a veiled attack on the Liberal Democrats, who form part of the UK's coalition government, he said that it would be "foolish" to even consider abandoning the Trident program, citing the "evolving threats" posed by Iran and North Korea.
"We need our nuclear deterrent as much today as we did when a previous British Government embarked on it over six decades ago. Of course, the world has changed dramatically. The Soviet Union no longer exists. But the nuclear threat has not gone away," said Cameron.
Members of the Liberal Democrats and the Labor Party have voiced opposition to the Trident program, criticizing it as no longer relevant to the geopolitical interests of the United Kingdom.
The UK government also faced sharp criticism from the Scottish National Party (SNP) on the issue, calling it an "obscene waste" of funds at a time of economic austerity. Furthermore, the SNP stated it would no longer tolerate the presence of Trident in Clyde.
Cameron, however, argues that there is no other way to protect the security interests of the UK from the "highly unpredictable and aggressive regime in North Korea." He maintained that the program's costs are reasonable, making up 1.5 per cent of the British benefits bill. There are no cheaper suggests to provide a "credible alternative."
"Only the retention of our independent deterrent makes clear to any adversary that the devastating cost of an attack on the UK or its allies will always be far greater than anything it might hope to gain," he says.
RT spoke to regular contributor and journalist Afshin Rattansi, who re-iterated the criticism put forth by the British parties:
"What we have here is David Cameron maybe 'going bananas'. He seems to be saying that we need Trident desperately to protect ourselves from North Korea. At the same time he visits a city where, at one point, there was a debate whether the children there had the same life expectancy as people in Afghanistan. More than one in four of the children in this country are living in poverty, and yet this US$150 billion is required to fend off threats from Iran and North Korea!"
The Trident initiative would overhaul inter-continental missiles with nuclear payloads based on Vanguard submarines due to go out of service in 2022. The current plan says the current subs would be replaced in 2028.
The UK government currently puts the total cost of the overhaul at $150 billion, which could in turn eat up 35 per cent of the UK's military budget in the coming years. Given that the British government is axing a large portion of its military budget, the opposition to Trident argues the UK simply cannot afford the expense.
Last year the UK Ministry of Defense put in orders worth $450 million to design new nuclear-armed submarines.
The final decision on Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent program is likely to take place after the next general election in 2015 and is predicted to be a major bone of contention in parliament.
Analysts have speculated that Labor may propose to scale down the plans in an effort to pander to the Liberal Democrats and form a coalition.
http://on.rt.com/l4i369
wn.com/UK Pm Pushes Nuclear 'deterrent' In Face Of N. Korea Threat
Prime Minister David Cameron has said it would be 'foolish' for Britain to renounce its nuclear program in the face of threats from North Korea and Iran. His call to arms comes despite harsh criticism that Trident is too costly and unnecessary.
British Prime Minister Cameron stated that the UK needs an "ultimate weapon" to combat the growing threat of nuclear attack which he said had "increased" since the end of the Cold War.
Writing in UK newspaper the Daily Telegraph, Cameron promoted the US$150 billion Trident program to overhaul Britain's nuclear defenses. In a veiled attack on the Liberal Democrats, who form part of the UK's coalition government, he said that it would be "foolish" to even consider abandoning the Trident program, citing the "evolving threats" posed by Iran and North Korea.
"We need our nuclear deterrent as much today as we did when a previous British Government embarked on it over six decades ago. Of course, the world has changed dramatically. The Soviet Union no longer exists. But the nuclear threat has not gone away," said Cameron.
Members of the Liberal Democrats and the Labor Party have voiced opposition to the Trident program, criticizing it as no longer relevant to the geopolitical interests of the United Kingdom.
The UK government also faced sharp criticism from the Scottish National Party (SNP) on the issue, calling it an "obscene waste" of funds at a time of economic austerity. Furthermore, the SNP stated it would no longer tolerate the presence of Trident in Clyde.
Cameron, however, argues that there is no other way to protect the security interests of the UK from the "highly unpredictable and aggressive regime in North Korea." He maintained that the program's costs are reasonable, making up 1.5 per cent of the British benefits bill. There are no cheaper suggests to provide a "credible alternative."
"Only the retention of our independent deterrent makes clear to any adversary that the devastating cost of an attack on the UK or its allies will always be far greater than anything it might hope to gain," he says.
RT spoke to regular contributor and journalist Afshin Rattansi, who re-iterated the criticism put forth by the British parties:
"What we have here is David Cameron maybe 'going bananas'. He seems to be saying that we need Trident desperately to protect ourselves from North Korea. At the same time he visits a city where, at one point, there was a debate whether the children there had the same life expectancy as people in Afghanistan. More than one in four of the children in this country are living in poverty, and yet this US$150 billion is required to fend off threats from Iran and North Korea!"
The Trident initiative would overhaul inter-continental missiles with nuclear payloads based on Vanguard submarines due to go out of service in 2022. The current plan says the current subs would be replaced in 2028.
The UK government currently puts the total cost of the overhaul at $150 billion, which could in turn eat up 35 per cent of the UK's military budget in the coming years. Given that the British government is axing a large portion of its military budget, the opposition to Trident argues the UK simply cannot afford the expense.
Last year the UK Ministry of Defense put in orders worth $450 million to design new nuclear-armed submarines.
The final decision on Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent program is likely to take place after the next general election in 2015 and is predicted to be a major bone of contention in parliament.
Analysts have speculated that Labor may propose to scale down the plans in an effort to pander to the Liberal Democrats and form a coalition.
http://on.rt.com/l4i369
- published: 05 Apr 2013
- views: 1152
Footage of the unarmed Trident II (D5) ballistic missile being fired (P1)
DEFENCE SECRETARY ANNOUNCES FURTHER £350M FOR SUCCESSOR SUBMARINES
The Defence Secretary will today (Monday) announce an additional £350M worth of funding for ...
DEFENCE SECRETARY ANNOUNCES FURTHER £350M FOR SUCCESSOR SUBMARINES
The Defence Secretary will today (Monday) announce an additional £350M worth of funding for the next stage of design work for Successor, the future generation of UK nuclear-armed submarines.
This investment will sustain 1,200 UK jobs and makes clear the Government's firm commitment to maintaining continuous at sea deterrence for future decades. The funding follows the initial £350M of design work announced earlier this year.
This announcement comes as Philip Hammond visited the home of the UK's nuclear deterrent at Faslane on the Clyde and follows the successful firing of an unarmed Trident ballistic missile by HMS Vigilant during a test launch in the Atlantic Ocean last week.
HMS Vigilant is one of four Vanguard Class submarines which maintain the UK's nuclear deterrent and this firing, the first in three years, confirms the credibility of the deterrent. The Vanguard submarines will be replaced from 2028 by the Successor which is currently being designed by British companies. As a result of today's announcement, BAE Systems will proceed with an additional £315M worth of work, with a further £38M at Babcock.
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said:
"Our continuous submarine-based nuclear deterrent is the ultimate safeguard of our national security and the Government is committed to maintaining it, both now and in the future. The test firing and further investment in replacing the deterrent demonstrates that commitment. This latest expenditure for the next generation of nuclear-armed submarines is an investment in UK security and the British economy, sustaining high-quality jobs and vital skills."
Commenting on the ongoing debate over Scottish independence, Mr Hammond said:
"We are confident that the Scottish people will choose to remain part of the United Kingdom. The Faslane complex is the largest employment site in Scotland with over 6,500 jobs underpinning the local economy. We have no plans to move the nuclear deterrent from the Clyde. On the contrary, we intend to move the Astute and Trafalgar Class attack submarines to Faslane, creating a further 1,500 jobs. The Scottish Government needs to explain how their policy would benefit Scotland's economy and safeguard Scottish jobs."
First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope said:
"The Royal Navy has for over 43 years continuously operated the UK's nuclear deterrent to stringent safety standards and HMS Vigilant's latest test firing before she returns to the patrol cycle reflects that successful deterrence is based upon strong determination. One of the core roles of the Royal Navy, the Continuous At Sea Deterrent remains an enduring strategic capability, underpinning our nation's commitment to the preservation of peace in our uncertain world."
All Royal Navy submarines will be based at Faslane by 2017, including the Astute and Trafalgar class attack submarines, which - along with the Sandown Class Mine Counter Measure vessels - will increase the workforce at the site to over 8,000 by 2022.
wn.com/Footage Of The Unarmed Trident Ii (D5) Ballistic Missile Being Fired (P1)
DEFENCE SECRETARY ANNOUNCES FURTHER £350M FOR SUCCESSOR SUBMARINES
The Defence Secretary will today (Monday) announce an additional £350M worth of funding for the next stage of design work for Successor, the future generation of UK nuclear-armed submarines.
This investment will sustain 1,200 UK jobs and makes clear the Government's firm commitment to maintaining continuous at sea deterrence for future decades. The funding follows the initial £350M of design work announced earlier this year.
This announcement comes as Philip Hammond visited the home of the UK's nuclear deterrent at Faslane on the Clyde and follows the successful firing of an unarmed Trident ballistic missile by HMS Vigilant during a test launch in the Atlantic Ocean last week.
HMS Vigilant is one of four Vanguard Class submarines which maintain the UK's nuclear deterrent and this firing, the first in three years, confirms the credibility of the deterrent. The Vanguard submarines will be replaced from 2028 by the Successor which is currently being designed by British companies. As a result of today's announcement, BAE Systems will proceed with an additional £315M worth of work, with a further £38M at Babcock.
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said:
"Our continuous submarine-based nuclear deterrent is the ultimate safeguard of our national security and the Government is committed to maintaining it, both now and in the future. The test firing and further investment in replacing the deterrent demonstrates that commitment. This latest expenditure for the next generation of nuclear-armed submarines is an investment in UK security and the British economy, sustaining high-quality jobs and vital skills."
Commenting on the ongoing debate over Scottish independence, Mr Hammond said:
"We are confident that the Scottish people will choose to remain part of the United Kingdom. The Faslane complex is the largest employment site in Scotland with over 6,500 jobs underpinning the local economy. We have no plans to move the nuclear deterrent from the Clyde. On the contrary, we intend to move the Astute and Trafalgar Class attack submarines to Faslane, creating a further 1,500 jobs. The Scottish Government needs to explain how their policy would benefit Scotland's economy and safeguard Scottish jobs."
First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope said:
"The Royal Navy has for over 43 years continuously operated the UK's nuclear deterrent to stringent safety standards and HMS Vigilant's latest test firing before she returns to the patrol cycle reflects that successful deterrence is based upon strong determination. One of the core roles of the Royal Navy, the Continuous At Sea Deterrent remains an enduring strategic capability, underpinning our nation's commitment to the preservation of peace in our uncertain world."
All Royal Navy submarines will be based at Faslane by 2017, including the Astute and Trafalgar class attack submarines, which - along with the Sandown Class Mine Counter Measure vessels - will increase the workforce at the site to over 8,000 by 2022.
- published: 29 Oct 2012
- views: 46308
UK should retain and renew Trident nuclear deterrent, review finds
Trident Commission said UK should retain and deploy nuclear arsenal for reasons of national security and responsibilities to Nato....
Trident Commission said UK should retain and deploy nuclear arsenal for reasons of national security and responsibilities to Nato.
wn.com/UK Should Retain And Renew Trident Nuclear Deterrent, Review Finds
Trident Commission said UK should retain and deploy nuclear arsenal for reasons of national security and responsibilities to Nato.
- published: 02 Jul 2014
- views: 52
Corbyn: I'm prepared to live with decision to renew Trident
Jeremy Corbyn has told ITV News he would "live with" Trident "somehow" if Labour voted to renew Britain's nuclear deterrent: http://bit.ly/1haFUiK
Subscribe fo...
Jeremy Corbyn has told ITV News he would "live with" Trident "somehow" if Labour voted to renew Britain's nuclear deterrent: http://bit.ly/1haFUiK
Subscribe for more from the ITV News: http://bit.ly/1KMJ3gG
wn.com/Corbyn I'm Prepared To Live With Decision To Renew Trident
Jeremy Corbyn has told ITV News he would "live with" Trident "somehow" if Labour voted to renew Britain's nuclear deterrent: http://bit.ly/1haFUiK
Subscribe for more from the ITV News: http://bit.ly/1KMJ3gG
- published: 30 Sep 2015
- views: 393
UpFront - Hans Blix backs Corbyn's call to scrap UK's Trident
Jeremy Corbyn, UK's opposition Labour party leader, has called to scrap Britain's independent nuclear deterrent programme, Trident, angering many within his own...
Jeremy Corbyn, UK's opposition Labour party leader, has called to scrap Britain's independent nuclear deterrent programme, Trident, angering many within his own party and prompting critics to question the effect it would have on the country’s national security.
In this web extra, Hans Blix, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supports Corbyn's call, saying Trident is "a tremendous cost and very little gain".
The former IAEA chief also says he does not think it adds to British security. "I think it's more a question of sentimental status seeking," Blix says, "They will keep their seat in the Security Council even if they do not continue Trident."
- Subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
- Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AJEnglish
- Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
- Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
wn.com/Upfront Hans Blix Backs Corbyn's Call To Scrap Uk's Trident
Jeremy Corbyn, UK's opposition Labour party leader, has called to scrap Britain's independent nuclear deterrent programme, Trident, angering many within his own party and prompting critics to question the effect it would have on the country’s national security.
In this web extra, Hans Blix, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supports Corbyn's call, saying Trident is "a tremendous cost and very little gain".
The former IAEA chief also says he does not think it adds to British security. "I think it's more a question of sentimental status seeking," Blix says, "They will keep their seat in the Security Council even if they do not continue Trident."
- Subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
- Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AJEnglish
- Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
- Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
- published: 30 Jan 2016
- views: 807
Peter Hitchens Discusses Trident on LBC (Jan 2016)
Peter Discusses Great Big Nuclear Willies on LBC.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/colossal-pointless-toy-peter-hitchens-lets-rip-at-trident--123315...
Peter Discusses Great Big Nuclear Willies on LBC.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/colossal-pointless-toy-peter-hitchens-lets-rip-at-trident--123315
wn.com/Peter Hitchens Discusses Trident On Lbc (Jan 2016)
Peter Discusses Great Big Nuclear Willies on LBC.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/colossal-pointless-toy-peter-hitchens-lets-rip-at-trident--123315
- published: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 1925
Trident nuclear weapons 'in UK's national interest'
Trident nuclear weapons 'in UK's national interest'
It is in the UK's national interest to keep the Trident nuclear weapons system, a group of former ministers...
Trident nuclear weapons 'in UK's national interest'
It is in the UK's national interest to keep the Trident nuclear weapons system, a group of former ministers, diplomats and generals have argued.
Maintaining a nuclear capability could help deter threats to the UK's security in future, the report by The Trident Commission concluded.
But they said continuous patrols could be relaxed while the UK must also show it is serious about working towards further international disarmament.
wn.com/Trident Nuclear Weapons 'in Uk's National Interest'
Trident nuclear weapons 'in UK's national interest'
It is in the UK's national interest to keep the Trident nuclear weapons system, a group of former ministers, diplomats and generals have argued.
Maintaining a nuclear capability could help deter threats to the UK's security in future, the report by The Trident Commission concluded.
But they said continuous patrols could be relaxed while the UK must also show it is serious about working towards further international disarmament.
- published: 01 Jul 2014
- views: 785
Hilary Benn Britain needs to maintain an independent nuclear deterrent
The shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn discusses whether Labour would support any move to scrap Trident, the UK’s nuclear weapons defence system, or withdraw ...
The shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn discusses whether Labour would support any move to scrap Trident, the UK’s nuclear weapons defence system, or withdraw from Nato. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Benn says that while he shares Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s desire to see a world free of nuclear weapons, he doesn’t believe other nuclear states would follow Britain’s lead in nuclear disarmament
wn.com/Hilary Benn Britain Needs To Maintain An Independent Nuclear Deterrent
The shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn discusses whether Labour would support any move to scrap Trident, the UK’s nuclear weapons defence system, or withdraw from Nato. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Benn says that while he shares Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s desire to see a world free of nuclear weapons, he doesn’t believe other nuclear states would follow Britain’s lead in nuclear disarmament
- published: 20 Sep 2015
- views: 69
-
Ditching Trident won’t achieve nuclear free world – Benn
Urging against unilateral nuclear disarmament, Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn has warned that scrapping the UK’s Trident deterrent is not the way to attain a nuclear-free world.
Speaking at the Chatham House think tank, Benn said: “I want a world without nuclear weapons … I think the way to get there is by multilateral negotiation and not by unilateral action.”Benn’s comments come as the Sha
-
Emily Thornberry clashes with Labour MPs over Trident ✔
Shadow defence secretary heckled by colleagues after urging them to keep an open mind on replacing nuclear deterrent
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrp79CMvJmtxYjGI1vHey-A/videos?shelf_id=0&view;=0&sort;=dd
Facebook: Http://Facebook.com/GocTinTuc
-
Iranian Sanctions, Trident’s Tired Technology & Bring Back Compulsory ID Cards?
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on the removal of EU sanctions against Iran, tax credit cuts, the UK’s outdated nuclear deterrent and what debates are going on in Parliament that no one else is talking about. Masoumeh Ebtekar, Iran’s Vice President talks about the dangers of rapprochement with a rapacious superpower – effects on oil, transportation, and the increasing danger of attacks similar to
-
Should David Cameron use WindowsXP to deploy Trident to kill 4 Billion?
Afshin Rattansi goes underground with RT UK IT supremo, Nick Vasin, on why the Royal Navy is entrusting the wiping out of 60% of humanity using cut-price Windows XP to save money on the 167 billion pound project - the UK’s nuclear deterrent Trident.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twit
-
Two shadow cabinet members hint they would quit over Trident policy change
Two members of Labour's shadow cabinet have hinted they will quit if the party changes its policy to scrapping Trident.
Owen Smith, the shadow work and pensions secretary, and Lord Falconer, the shadow justice secretary, have both faced questions on whether they would walk away from the front bench over the issue.
The renewal of the UK's nuclear deterrent is looming as the next major point of co
-
Trident Claims Labour Scalps
The Shadow Minister for the Armed Forces has stood down from his position with immediate effect following a shadow cabinet reshuffle by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Kevan Jones, the MP for North Durham and the Commonwealth War Graves Commissioner, resigned after Maria Eagle was moved from her post as Shadow Defence Secretary to the Culture, Media and Sport job.
Mr Jones has opposing views on the
-
Costs For UK Nuclear Deterrent Trident Continues To Spiral
From: https://www.youtube.com/user/videosptv
November 25, 2015 - The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. The cost of replacing the Trident submarines is set to rise to 41 billion pounds. The government previously stated four new submarines would cost 25 billion pounds. This brin
-
Alex Attwood MLA on trident renewal
Alex Attwood MLA opposes the renewal of the Trident nuclear deterrent at a const of at least £170 billion
-
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'could be rendered obsolete by hackers'
The UK's Trident nuclear weapons system could be rendered obsolete by cyber attacks, former Defence Secretary Lord Browne has warned.
The ex-Labour minister told the BBC unless "weak spots" were protected, there was "no guarantee" of a reliable nuclear deterrent for the PM "when he needs to reach for i
-
Corbyn Clashes With Defence Chief Over Trident
Mr Corbyn tells it's not "appropriate" for the general to be speaking publicly about his views on the nuclear deterrent.
-
Jeremy Corbyn hits back at armed forces chief over Trident comments
Jeremy Corbyn has hit out at the head of the armed forces after he publicly expressed concern about the Labour leader's views on Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent.
Mr Corbyn said the comments by General Sir Nicholas Houghton were a breach of the constitutional principle that the military did not intervene directly in matters of political dispute.
He said that he would be writing to Defence Secre
-
Scottish Labour to vote on Trident renewal - BBC News
Scottish Labour is to vote on whether to call for the UK's Trident nuclear missile system to be scrapped.
A motion opposing the renewal of Trident will be discussed by delegates at the party's conference in Perth.
The main UK party as a whole currently backs replacing the country's nuclear deterrent.
Members are expected to vote against renewal, in a move supported by UK leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Scot
-
TRIDENT REPLACEMENT - LEASE RENT or BUY ? It's not complicated.
via YouTube Capture Wednesday 30th September 2015.
The question kicked around perennially now, and a vote is coming on it in the UK, is what the replacement will be in the UK for Trident?
The nuclear deterrent is currently based in Faslane Nuclear submarine base, on the Clyde Coast. We drove past it as children, en route to gran & grandpa's little wooden home, on some old MOD property near KIlc
-
Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Become A Patron -
https://www.patreon.com/UKIPPERS?ty=h
Donations:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted;_button_id=XPGU54UL3JXCE
Join The Purple Revolution:
http://www.ukip.org/?recruiter_id=264628
Follow Me On Google+:
https://plus.google.com/u/2/b/115727576812097248965/115727576812097248965/about?pageId=115727576
-
Trident- Does Britain need our Submerged Weapons of Nuclear War
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. On the week that Labour intend to debate whether the UK needs to spend a 100 million on renewing our nuclear fleet we look at whether the our Government even pushes the buttons on our weapons of mass destruction. Plus why is an American nuclear sub docked in the waters of Scotland?
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Und
-
Corbyn Facing Trident Defeat At Union Hands
Jeremy Corbyn looks like he is heading for defeat on scrapping Trident after the Unite union - the party's biggest financial backer - said it would vote to keep the nuclear deterrent.
Len McCluskey, who backed Mr Corbyn's leadership campaign, told Sky News he would vote to protect jobs.
He said: "Everyone would love the whole world to get rid of nuclear weapons - we understand the moral arguments
-
Corbyn Hints He Will Accept Split On Trident
Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Labour MPs might be given a free vote on scrapping the Trident nuclear deterrent because of the shadow cabinet split on the issue.
The Labour leader accepted he may not be able to unite the party on his no-nukes policy and conceded he would probably have to "come to an accommodation of some sort".
Speaking on the first day of the party's conference in Brighton, he ask
-
Corbyn Hints He Will Accept Split On Trident
The Labour leader suggests he might let key members of his shadow cabinet rebel in a Commons vote on the nuclear deterrent.
-
LIVE : Jeremy Corbyn outlines views on Trident with Andrew Marr
Jeremy Corbyn has moved to calm tensions within the Labour party over Trident by saying that he will reach an “accommodation of some sort” that could allow members of the shadow cabinet to support the renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent.
As Labour conference organisers meet behind closed doors in Brighton to decide whether to hold a vote on Trident, the Labour leader said he saw nothing wrong
-
Jeremy Corbyn will work with SNP to remove Trident
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he is willing to work with the SNP to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland.
Speaking to BBC Scotland, Mr Corbyn reaffirmed his long-standing opposition to Trident and said he would vote with the SNP at Westminster on the issue.
Mr Corbyn said he would like to see jobs associated with nuclear defence in Scotland transferred to other forms of high-value enginee
Ditching Trident won’t achieve nuclear free world – Benn
Urging against unilateral nuclear disarmament, Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn has warned that scrapping the UK’s Trident deterrent is not the way to attai...
Urging against unilateral nuclear disarmament, Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn has warned that scrapping the UK’s Trident deterrent is not the way to attain a nuclear-free world.
Speaking at the Chatham House think tank, Benn said: “I want a world without nuclear weapons … I think the way to get there is by multilateral negotiation and not by unilateral action.”Benn’s comments come as the Shadow Cabinet prepares to decide whether to back Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in calling to ditch the nuclear deterrent, ahead of a vote on renewal that will be held sometime this year. Although Corbyn is a lifelong opponent of nuclear weapons, most members of his Shadow Cabinet back renewal of the four Vanguard submarines.
Benn argued that giving up the UK’s weapons unilaterally would not force other states to abandon their own nuclear deterrent systems.
“If we gave ours up, I don’t believe for a second any one of the other nuclear powers in the world would say: ‘Well, if you are not going to keep yours any more, we are going to chuck ours in the dustbin.’ It would not happen,” he said.
Benn warned that disarmament may lead to a world where all countries but North Korea have abandoned their weapons.
“Who fancies living in a world in which everyone else has given up their nuclear weapons and North Korea still has its nuclear weapons? If you fancy that, put your hands up.”
wn.com/Ditching Trident Won’T Achieve Nuclear Free World – Benn
Urging against unilateral nuclear disarmament, Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn has warned that scrapping the UK’s Trident deterrent is not the way to attain a nuclear-free world.
Speaking at the Chatham House think tank, Benn said: “I want a world without nuclear weapons … I think the way to get there is by multilateral negotiation and not by unilateral action.”Benn’s comments come as the Shadow Cabinet prepares to decide whether to back Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in calling to ditch the nuclear deterrent, ahead of a vote on renewal that will be held sometime this year. Although Corbyn is a lifelong opponent of nuclear weapons, most members of his Shadow Cabinet back renewal of the four Vanguard submarines.
Benn argued that giving up the UK’s weapons unilaterally would not force other states to abandon their own nuclear deterrent systems.
“If we gave ours up, I don’t believe for a second any one of the other nuclear powers in the world would say: ‘Well, if you are not going to keep yours any more, we are going to chuck ours in the dustbin.’ It would not happen,” he said.
Benn warned that disarmament may lead to a world where all countries but North Korea have abandoned their weapons.
“Who fancies living in a world in which everyone else has given up their nuclear weapons and North Korea still has its nuclear weapons? If you fancy that, put your hands up.”
- published: 11 Feb 2016
- views: 1
Emily Thornberry clashes with Labour MPs over Trident ✔
Shadow defence secretary heckled by colleagues after urging them to keep an open mind on replacing nuclear deterrent
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/...
Shadow defence secretary heckled by colleagues after urging them to keep an open mind on replacing nuclear deterrent
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrp79CMvJmtxYjGI1vHey-A/videos?shelf_id=0&view;=0&sort;=dd
Facebook: Http://Facebook.com/GocTinTuc
wn.com/Emily Thornberry Clashes With Labour Mps Over Trident ✔
Shadow defence secretary heckled by colleagues after urging them to keep an open mind on replacing nuclear deterrent
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrp79CMvJmtxYjGI1vHey-A/videos?shelf_id=0&view;=0&sort;=dd
Facebook: Http://Facebook.com/GocTinTuc
- published: 08 Feb 2016
- views: 48
Iranian Sanctions, Trident’s Tired Technology & Bring Back Compulsory ID Cards?
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on the removal of EU sanctions against Iran, tax credit cuts, the UK’s outdated nuclear deterrent and what debates are going on...
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on the removal of EU sanctions against Iran, tax credit cuts, the UK’s outdated nuclear deterrent and what debates are going on in Parliament that no one else is talking about. Masoumeh Ebtekar, Iran’s Vice President talks about the dangers of rapprochement with a rapacious superpower – effects on oil, transportation, and the increasing danger of attacks similar to those that followed the disarmament of Libya. We speak to the former Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Sir Vince Cable on how David Cameron is able to push through laws without even consulting MPs? Plus Trident’s nuclear submarines running off of Microsoft Windows XP and Pete Bennett & Sebastian Pacher’s report on the Lords trying to bring back the National Identity Register & ID cards.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
wn.com/Iranian Sanctions, Trident’S Tired Technology Bring Back Compulsory Id Cards
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on the removal of EU sanctions against Iran, tax credit cuts, the UK’s outdated nuclear deterrent and what debates are going on in Parliament that no one else is talking about. Masoumeh Ebtekar, Iran’s Vice President talks about the dangers of rapprochement with a rapacious superpower – effects on oil, transportation, and the increasing danger of attacks similar to those that followed the disarmament of Libya. We speak to the former Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Sir Vince Cable on how David Cameron is able to push through laws without even consulting MPs? Plus Trident’s nuclear submarines running off of Microsoft Windows XP and Pete Bennett & Sebastian Pacher’s report on the Lords trying to bring back the National Identity Register & ID cards.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
- published: 25 Jan 2016
- views: 422
Should David Cameron use WindowsXP to deploy Trident to kill 4 Billion?
Afshin Rattansi goes underground with RT UK IT supremo, Nick Vasin, on why the Royal Navy is entrusting the wiping out of 60% of humanity using cut-price Window...
Afshin Rattansi goes underground with RT UK IT supremo, Nick Vasin, on why the Royal Navy is entrusting the wiping out of 60% of humanity using cut-price Windows XP to save money on the 167 billion pound project - the UK’s nuclear deterrent Trident.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
wn.com/Should David Cameron Use Windowsxp To Deploy Trident To Kill 4 Billion
Afshin Rattansi goes underground with RT UK IT supremo, Nick Vasin, on why the Royal Navy is entrusting the wiping out of 60% of humanity using cut-price Windows XP to save money on the 167 billion pound project - the UK’s nuclear deterrent Trident.
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
- published: 25 Jan 2016
- views: 274
Two shadow cabinet members hint they would quit over Trident policy change
Two members of Labour's shadow cabinet have hinted they will quit if the party changes its policy to scrapping Trident.
Owen Smith, the shadow work and pension...
Two members of Labour's shadow cabinet have hinted they will quit if the party changes its policy to scrapping Trident.
Owen Smith, the shadow work and pensions secretary, and Lord Falconer, the shadow justice secretary, have both faced questions on whether they would walk away from the front bench over the issue.
The renewal of the UK's nuclear deterrent is looming as the next major point of contention for the party after Jeremy Corbyn shifted pro-Trident Maria Eagle from shadow defence secretary and replaced her with Emily Thornberry, who supports his call for Britain to disarm unilaterally.
Mr Smith was asked on Pienaar's Politics on BBC Radio 5 Live if a shift to a position of unilateral disarmament would prompt his resignation.
He said: "Well that would be difficult for me but I think the key thing that I would do is stick in, in the run-up to that decision, and make the case.
"We have got to have, I think, a very adult argument in the Labour Party about this - not in public I hope, not in the way in which we have occasionally argued publicly recently - but it is an enormously serious, technical, strategic question for Britain as to what the nature of our nuclear weapons are and whether we have a nuclear deterrent.
"My view is that unfortunately we do need one."
Meanwhile, Lord Falconer was asked a similar question on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show.
He said: "Let's see what happens in relation to that but I am clear that I support Trident remaining."
wn.com/Two Shadow Cabinet Members Hint They Would Quit Over Trident Policy Change
Two members of Labour's shadow cabinet have hinted they will quit if the party changes its policy to scrapping Trident.
Owen Smith, the shadow work and pensions secretary, and Lord Falconer, the shadow justice secretary, have both faced questions on whether they would walk away from the front bench over the issue.
The renewal of the UK's nuclear deterrent is looming as the next major point of contention for the party after Jeremy Corbyn shifted pro-Trident Maria Eagle from shadow defence secretary and replaced her with Emily Thornberry, who supports his call for Britain to disarm unilaterally.
Mr Smith was asked on Pienaar's Politics on BBC Radio 5 Live if a shift to a position of unilateral disarmament would prompt his resignation.
He said: "Well that would be difficult for me but I think the key thing that I would do is stick in, in the run-up to that decision, and make the case.
"We have got to have, I think, a very adult argument in the Labour Party about this - not in public I hope, not in the way in which we have occasionally argued publicly recently - but it is an enormously serious, technical, strategic question for Britain as to what the nature of our nuclear weapons are and whether we have a nuclear deterrent.
"My view is that unfortunately we do need one."
Meanwhile, Lord Falconer was asked a similar question on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show.
He said: "Let's see what happens in relation to that but I am clear that I support Trident remaining."
- published: 10 Jan 2016
- views: 2
Trident Claims Labour Scalps
The Shadow Minister for the Armed Forces has stood down from his position with immediate effect following a shadow cabinet reshuffle by Labour leader Jeremy Cor...
The Shadow Minister for the Armed Forces has stood down from his position with immediate effect following a shadow cabinet reshuffle by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Kevan Jones, the MP for North Durham and the Commonwealth War Graves Commissioner, resigned after Maria Eagle was moved from her post as Shadow Defence Secretary to the Culture, Media and Sport job.
Mr Jones has opposing views on the future of the Trident programme with both Jeremy Corbyn and the new Shadow Defence Secretary Emily Thornberry.
In a letter to the Labour leader posted on his Twitter account Kevan Jones said: "The issue of the UK’s nuclear deterrent and how we progress the aim of nuclear disarmament has always been one that has divided opinion within the Labour party."
"There are well-founded views on each side of the debate, and I respect those like yourself who advocate a unilateralist position. However, as you know from our discussions when you appointed me in this role, I do not agree with this view. I have been clear and consistent that I believe it is the right policy for the country to maintain a minimum credible nuclear deterrent, while working to advance global nuclear disarmament. I am determined to continue making the case for Labour to have strong, credible defence and security policies, and I feel that the most effective way for me to continue to do this is from the backbenches."
Recommended Reading: Comment - Corbyn, NATO and the Nuclear Future
Formerly the Shadow Minister for Veterans, Kevan Jones publicly clashed with the co-covener of Labour's Defence Review Ken Livingstone in November 2015. Mr Jones, who has openly spoken about suffering from depression, was told to get "psychiatric help" by Mr Livingstone when the two fell out over defence.
Mr Livingstone, a long-time opponent of the UK's nuclear deterrent later apologised.
Subscribe to Forces TV HERE http://bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: http://forces.tv
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ForcesTV
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Forces_TV
wn.com/Trident Claims Labour Scalps
The Shadow Minister for the Armed Forces has stood down from his position with immediate effect following a shadow cabinet reshuffle by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Kevan Jones, the MP for North Durham and the Commonwealth War Graves Commissioner, resigned after Maria Eagle was moved from her post as Shadow Defence Secretary to the Culture, Media and Sport job.
Mr Jones has opposing views on the future of the Trident programme with both Jeremy Corbyn and the new Shadow Defence Secretary Emily Thornberry.
In a letter to the Labour leader posted on his Twitter account Kevan Jones said: "The issue of the UK’s nuclear deterrent and how we progress the aim of nuclear disarmament has always been one that has divided opinion within the Labour party."
"There are well-founded views on each side of the debate, and I respect those like yourself who advocate a unilateralist position. However, as you know from our discussions when you appointed me in this role, I do not agree with this view. I have been clear and consistent that I believe it is the right policy for the country to maintain a minimum credible nuclear deterrent, while working to advance global nuclear disarmament. I am determined to continue making the case for Labour to have strong, credible defence and security policies, and I feel that the most effective way for me to continue to do this is from the backbenches."
Recommended Reading: Comment - Corbyn, NATO and the Nuclear Future
Formerly the Shadow Minister for Veterans, Kevan Jones publicly clashed with the co-covener of Labour's Defence Review Ken Livingstone in November 2015. Mr Jones, who has openly spoken about suffering from depression, was told to get "psychiatric help" by Mr Livingstone when the two fell out over defence.
Mr Livingstone, a long-time opponent of the UK's nuclear deterrent later apologised.
Subscribe to Forces TV HERE http://bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: http://forces.tv
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ForcesTV
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Forces_TV
- published: 06 Jan 2016
- views: 368
Costs For UK Nuclear Deterrent Trident Continues To Spiral
From: https://www.youtube.com/user/videosptv
November 25, 2015 - The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trid...
From: https://www.youtube.com/user/videosptv
November 25, 2015 - The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. The cost of replacing the Trident submarines is set to rise to 41 billion pounds. The government previously stated four new submarines would cost 25 billion pounds. This brings the total figure for replacing the aging system to just under 200 billion pounds.
Live @ http://www.presstv.ir/live.html
Twitter @ http://twitter.com/PressTV
LiveLeak @ http://www.liveleak.com/c/PressTV
Facebook @ http://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV
Google+ @ http://plus.google.com/+VideosPTV
Instagram @ http://instagram.com/presstvchannel
SoundCloud@ https://soundcloud.com/videosptv
PigmineNews.com: http://www.pigminenews.com
PigmineNews on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PigMineNews
PigmineNews on Twitter: http://twitter.com/PigmineNews
PigMine7 on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pigmine7
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
wn.com/Costs For UK Nuclear Deterrent Trident Continues To Spiral
From: https://www.youtube.com/user/videosptv
November 25, 2015 - The UK government has announced a further hike in the cost of replacing its controversial Trident nuclear program in its Strategic Defense and Security Review. The cost of replacing the Trident submarines is set to rise to 41 billion pounds. The government previously stated four new submarines would cost 25 billion pounds. This brings the total figure for replacing the aging system to just under 200 billion pounds.
Live @ http://www.presstv.ir/live.html
Twitter @ http://twitter.com/PressTV
LiveLeak @ http://www.liveleak.com/c/PressTV
Facebook @ http://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV
Google+ @ http://plus.google.com/+VideosPTV
Instagram @ http://instagram.com/presstvchannel
SoundCloud@ https://soundcloud.com/videosptv
PigmineNews.com: http://www.pigminenews.com
PigmineNews on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PigMineNews
PigmineNews on Twitter: http://twitter.com/PigmineNews
PigMine7 on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pigmine7
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
- published: 25 Nov 2015
- views: 6
Alex Attwood MLA on trident renewal
Alex Attwood MLA opposes the renewal of the Trident nuclear deterrent at a const of at least £170 billion...
Alex Attwood MLA opposes the renewal of the Trident nuclear deterrent at a const of at least £170 billion
wn.com/Alex Attwood Mla On Trident Renewal
Alex Attwood MLA opposes the renewal of the Trident nuclear deterrent at a const of at least £170 billion
- published: 25 Nov 2015
- views: 31
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'could be rendered obsolete by hackers'
The UK's Trident nuclear weapons system could be rendered obsol...
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'could be rendered obsolete by hackers'
The UK's Trident nuclear weapons system could be rendered obsolete by cyber attacks, former Defence Secretary Lord Browne has warned.
The ex-Labour minister told the BBC unless "weak spots" were protected, there was "no guarantee" of a reliable nuclear deterrent for the PM "when he needs to reach for it".
Ex-Conservative Defence Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind played down the risk.
The comments come ahead of a Commons debate on the future of Trident.
SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL
TAGS
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
wn.com/Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
Trident 'could be rendered obsolete by hackers'
The UK's Trident nuclear weapons system could be rendered obsolete by cyber attacks, former Defence Secretary Lord Browne has warned.
The ex-Labour minister told the BBC unless "weak spots" were protected, there was "no guarantee" of a reliable nuclear deterrent for the PM "when he needs to reach for it".
Ex-Conservative Defence Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind played down the risk.
The comments come ahead of a Commons debate on the future of Trident.
SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL
TAGS
Trident 'Could Be Rendered Obsolete By Hackers'
- published: 24 Nov 2015
- views: 9
Corbyn Clashes With Defence Chief Over Trident
Mr Corbyn tells it's not "appropriate" for the general to be speaking publicly about his views on the nuclear deterrent....
Mr Corbyn tells it's not "appropriate" for the general to be speaking publicly about his views on the nuclear deterrent.
wn.com/Corbyn Clashes With Defence Chief Over Trident
Mr Corbyn tells it's not "appropriate" for the general to be speaking publicly about his views on the nuclear deterrent.
- published: 09 Nov 2015
- views: 432
Jeremy Corbyn hits back at armed forces chief over Trident comments
Jeremy Corbyn has hit out at the head of the armed forces after he publicly expressed concern about the Labour leader's views on Britain's Trident nuclear deter...
Jeremy Corbyn has hit out at the head of the armed forces after he publicly expressed concern about the Labour leader's views on Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent.
Mr Corbyn said the comments by General Sir Nicholas Houghton were a breach of the constitutional principle that the military did not intervene directly in matters of political dispute.
He said that he would be writing to Defence Secretary Michael Fallon calling on him to ensure "the neutrality of the armed forces is upheld".
wn.com/Jeremy Corbyn Hits Back At Armed Forces Chief Over Trident Comments
Jeremy Corbyn has hit out at the head of the armed forces after he publicly expressed concern about the Labour leader's views on Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent.
Mr Corbyn said the comments by General Sir Nicholas Houghton were a breach of the constitutional principle that the military did not intervene directly in matters of political dispute.
He said that he would be writing to Defence Secretary Michael Fallon calling on him to ensure "the neutrality of the armed forces is upheld".
- published: 08 Nov 2015
- views: 93
Scottish Labour to vote on Trident renewal - BBC News
Scottish Labour is to vote on whether to call for the UK's Trident nuclear missile system to be scrapped.
A motion opposing the renewal of Trident will be discu...
Scottish Labour is to vote on whether to call for the UK's Trident nuclear missile system to be scrapped.
A motion opposing the renewal of Trident will be discussed by delegates at the party's conference in Perth.
The main UK party as a whole currently backs replacing the country's nuclear deterrent.
Members are expected to vote against renewal, in a move supported by UK leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Scottish party leader Kezia Dugdale supports moves towards international agreement on disarmament.
Speaking ahead of the conference, Ms Dugdale told the BBC she understood the strength of feeling on the issue and was "open-minded" about the possibility of her party voting not to replace the nuclear weapons system.
Union concerns
She said that if a new fleet of nuclear-armed submarines was not ordered, the money saved should go to the communities that lose out.
Scottish activists made Trident a priority issue for a policy vote at the conference after it received the most votes of the 17 issues proposed for debate.
The trade union reform bill, housing and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will also be discussed.
The GMB union has written to party members warning that cancelling the Trident replacement would threaten thousands of defence jobs in Scotland.
Scottish Labour suffered a devastating defeat in May's general election, with the party losing 40 of its 41 seats to the SNP, which has pledged to remove nuclear weapons from Scottish waters.
Conservative leader and Prime Minister David Cameron has always maintained the UK needs to keep its nuclear weapons, calling it as "insurance policy" against attacks. Replacing Trident was a Tory manifesto pledge in the general election.
Labour has supported Trident renewal, saying it has been a "cornerstone" of peace and security for nearly 50 years - but that policy is now in doubt after the election of long-time opponent Jeremy Corbyn as party leader. He says the issue will form part of their defence review, but has also said that even if there were a replacement system, he would never use them as PM.
The SNP, which now has 56 MPs in the House of Commons, opposes Trident renewal. During the election campaign it described Trident as "unusable and indefensible - and the plans to renew it are ludicrous on both defence and financial grounds".
The Lib Dems, who insisted on no final decision being taken while they were in coalition, have always been sceptical about a like-for-like replacement and insisted on a value for money review. They back a "step down the nuclear ladder" with a smaller nuclear weapons system providing a "minimal yet credible" deterrent.
wn.com/Scottish Labour To Vote On Trident Renewal BBC News
Scottish Labour is to vote on whether to call for the UK's Trident nuclear missile system to be scrapped.
A motion opposing the renewal of Trident will be discussed by delegates at the party's conference in Perth.
The main UK party as a whole currently backs replacing the country's nuclear deterrent.
Members are expected to vote against renewal, in a move supported by UK leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Scottish party leader Kezia Dugdale supports moves towards international agreement on disarmament.
Speaking ahead of the conference, Ms Dugdale told the BBC she understood the strength of feeling on the issue and was "open-minded" about the possibility of her party voting not to replace the nuclear weapons system.
Union concerns
She said that if a new fleet of nuclear-armed submarines was not ordered, the money saved should go to the communities that lose out.
Scottish activists made Trident a priority issue for a policy vote at the conference after it received the most votes of the 17 issues proposed for debate.
The trade union reform bill, housing and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will also be discussed.
The GMB union has written to party members warning that cancelling the Trident replacement would threaten thousands of defence jobs in Scotland.
Scottish Labour suffered a devastating defeat in May's general election, with the party losing 40 of its 41 seats to the SNP, which has pledged to remove nuclear weapons from Scottish waters.
Conservative leader and Prime Minister David Cameron has always maintained the UK needs to keep its nuclear weapons, calling it as "insurance policy" against attacks. Replacing Trident was a Tory manifesto pledge in the general election.
Labour has supported Trident renewal, saying it has been a "cornerstone" of peace and security for nearly 50 years - but that policy is now in doubt after the election of long-time opponent Jeremy Corbyn as party leader. He says the issue will form part of their defence review, but has also said that even if there were a replacement system, he would never use them as PM.
The SNP, which now has 56 MPs in the House of Commons, opposes Trident renewal. During the election campaign it described Trident as "unusable and indefensible - and the plans to renew it are ludicrous on both defence and financial grounds".
The Lib Dems, who insisted on no final decision being taken while they were in coalition, have always been sceptical about a like-for-like replacement and insisted on a value for money review. They back a "step down the nuclear ladder" with a smaller nuclear weapons system providing a "minimal yet credible" deterrent.
- published: 01 Nov 2015
- views: 37
TRIDENT REPLACEMENT - LEASE RENT or BUY ? It's not complicated.
via YouTube Capture Wednesday 30th September 2015.
The question kicked around perennially now, and a vote is coming on it in the UK, is what the replacement wi...
via YouTube Capture Wednesday 30th September 2015.
The question kicked around perennially now, and a vote is coming on it in the UK, is what the replacement will be in the UK for Trident?
The nuclear deterrent is currently based in Faslane Nuclear submarine base, on the Clyde Coast. We drove past it as children, en route to gran & grandpa's little wooden home, on some old MOD property near KIlcreggan. It still had gun emplacements, the bullet-pimples in the 1/4" steel plates, still visible.
The base is controversial - to this day there is a standing opposition, camped on the other side of the road. That, is why the UK or Britain is still worth living in, it's still possible. Try that sort of protest in Russia, see what happens. Or Pakistan, or many places.
Call it back-door programming, 'fail safe' mechanism, whatever. The idea of a little Nuclear power like Britain, the UK, being able to unilaterally launch an ICBM strike (Inter Continental Ballistic Missile), against Russia or Iran or somewhere, is a ridiculous one.
The United Kingdom, comprising Great Britain and Northern Ireland (at the moment!) simply would not be ALLOWED to launch independently of Washington's say-so. It is literally an incredible idea, as in not credible. So thinking needs to be on the basis of any launch being either because your big partner in Defence (for the UK it's America and Europe, NATO) is agreeing, or because they are uncontactable due to damage already inflicted in a surprise attack.
All sorts of people even in mainstream media, talk of land-based nuclear missiles, movies tout silos in some wasteland somewhere - fact is, nowhere is inaccessible enough to be hidden, and think of the construction work. All that activity, and your 'frenemy' (eg Russia) really does not notice? That is underestimating them, one of the most dangerous mistakes an opponent can make.
When you are ONLY able to afford the SMALLEST of nuclear arsenals - it really is going to be an underwater armada. Maybe the USA and Russia and China have so many of the darn things, they can afford to hedge their bets, by sticking some underneath a bomber or on an Aircraft Carrier (a 'big Stick' like the US Navy Nimitz-class Carriers eg USS Theodore Roosevelt), or even yes, in an underground bunker or silo.
The UK, Great Britain, is not at that level.
My final word, speaks to the 'opportunity cost' of this nuclear deterrent. In other words, if you paint your front door black, when you had a load of green paint already in the shed, you pay the price of the asset that was green paint, NOT being used, probably going off in the tin, and also having to PAY MORE for a load of black paint.
That is the opportunity cost of deciding to paint the front door black instead of green.
Here, CONVENTIONAL FORCES are going to be our 'green paint'. They are deteriorating, we already have them, we are choosing to buy something else entirely.
BUT we cannot deploy the nuclear devices! In practice, they are going to sit there, probably unused, their entire life! Conventional forces, now them we can use. Troops, weapons, a lot of it can even be shared with Police if necessary (eg small arms).
One, we can bank on being deployed (conventional forces & equipment), the other (nuclear devices) will NEVER be used. If it ever was, you wouldn't care about my poxy video view on the matter, and you would find the only tech you would need, is a Geiger counter, to check if tins of food were edible.
Lease them, it has to be submerged relatively discretely under water, and accept there would only ever be a joint decision made to launch. Let's get with that, and not get carried away with spending on something we need, but once we use it if ever, our lives as we knew them, are over. The financial package, is about the only discussion point.
Putin is there to remind us all in the West, Russia and others, are well-behaved only if there's a big dog or two, guarding your front gate - and the back gate, and the wild pasture out the back...
.
.
.
wn.com/Trident Replacement Lease Rent Or Buy It's Not Complicated.
via YouTube Capture Wednesday 30th September 2015.
The question kicked around perennially now, and a vote is coming on it in the UK, is what the replacement will be in the UK for Trident?
The nuclear deterrent is currently based in Faslane Nuclear submarine base, on the Clyde Coast. We drove past it as children, en route to gran & grandpa's little wooden home, on some old MOD property near KIlcreggan. It still had gun emplacements, the bullet-pimples in the 1/4" steel plates, still visible.
The base is controversial - to this day there is a standing opposition, camped on the other side of the road. That, is why the UK or Britain is still worth living in, it's still possible. Try that sort of protest in Russia, see what happens. Or Pakistan, or many places.
Call it back-door programming, 'fail safe' mechanism, whatever. The idea of a little Nuclear power like Britain, the UK, being able to unilaterally launch an ICBM strike (Inter Continental Ballistic Missile), against Russia or Iran or somewhere, is a ridiculous one.
The United Kingdom, comprising Great Britain and Northern Ireland (at the moment!) simply would not be ALLOWED to launch independently of Washington's say-so. It is literally an incredible idea, as in not credible. So thinking needs to be on the basis of any launch being either because your big partner in Defence (for the UK it's America and Europe, NATO) is agreeing, or because they are uncontactable due to damage already inflicted in a surprise attack.
All sorts of people even in mainstream media, talk of land-based nuclear missiles, movies tout silos in some wasteland somewhere - fact is, nowhere is inaccessible enough to be hidden, and think of the construction work. All that activity, and your 'frenemy' (eg Russia) really does not notice? That is underestimating them, one of the most dangerous mistakes an opponent can make.
When you are ONLY able to afford the SMALLEST of nuclear arsenals - it really is going to be an underwater armada. Maybe the USA and Russia and China have so many of the darn things, they can afford to hedge their bets, by sticking some underneath a bomber or on an Aircraft Carrier (a 'big Stick' like the US Navy Nimitz-class Carriers eg USS Theodore Roosevelt), or even yes, in an underground bunker or silo.
The UK, Great Britain, is not at that level.
My final word, speaks to the 'opportunity cost' of this nuclear deterrent. In other words, if you paint your front door black, when you had a load of green paint already in the shed, you pay the price of the asset that was green paint, NOT being used, probably going off in the tin, and also having to PAY MORE for a load of black paint.
That is the opportunity cost of deciding to paint the front door black instead of green.
Here, CONVENTIONAL FORCES are going to be our 'green paint'. They are deteriorating, we already have them, we are choosing to buy something else entirely.
BUT we cannot deploy the nuclear devices! In practice, they are going to sit there, probably unused, their entire life! Conventional forces, now them we can use. Troops, weapons, a lot of it can even be shared with Police if necessary (eg small arms).
One, we can bank on being deployed (conventional forces & equipment), the other (nuclear devices) will NEVER be used. If it ever was, you wouldn't care about my poxy video view on the matter, and you would find the only tech you would need, is a Geiger counter, to check if tins of food were edible.
Lease them, it has to be submerged relatively discretely under water, and accept there would only ever be a joint decision made to launch. Let's get with that, and not get carried away with spending on something we need, but once we use it if ever, our lives as we knew them, are over. The financial package, is about the only discussion point.
Putin is there to remind us all in the West, Russia and others, are well-behaved only if there's a big dog or two, guarding your front gate - and the back gate, and the wild pasture out the back...
.
.
.
- published: 30 Sep 2015
- views: 49
Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Become A Patron -
https://www.patreon.com/UKIPPERS?ty=h
Donations:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/w...
Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Become A Patron -
https://www.patreon.com/UKIPPERS?ty=h
Donations:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted;_button_id=XPGU54UL3JXCE
Join The Purple Revolution:
http://www.ukip.org/?recruiter_id=264628
Follow Me On Google+:
https://plus.google.com/u/2/b/115727576812097248965/115727576812097248965/about?pageId=115727576812097248965
For Trolling Content Go Here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/BushBlitzer
For The Latest Upcoming Games / Trailers Go Here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc5eLJretEGstGqjsNtuMqw
For The Latest Movies / Film Trailers Go Here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3zy68jHoJG3yJVXa15UiMA
My Social Media:
http://www.twitch.tv/ussrsovietblitzer
https://twitter.com/BushPirateBlitz
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/BushPirate)
http://sovietblitzer.tumblr.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bush-Pirates/442420559208370
wn.com/Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray Schools Kate Hudson On Nuclear Deterrence
Become A Patron -
https://www.patreon.com/UKIPPERS?ty=h
Donations:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted;_button_id=XPGU54UL3JXCE
Join The Purple Revolution:
http://www.ukip.org/?recruiter_id=264628
Follow Me On Google+:
https://plus.google.com/u/2/b/115727576812097248965/115727576812097248965/about?pageId=115727576812097248965
For Trolling Content Go Here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/BushBlitzer
For The Latest Upcoming Games / Trailers Go Here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc5eLJretEGstGqjsNtuMqw
For The Latest Movies / Film Trailers Go Here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3zy68jHoJG3yJVXa15UiMA
My Social Media:
http://www.twitch.tv/ussrsovietblitzer
https://twitter.com/BushPirateBlitz
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/BushPirate)
http://sovietblitzer.tumblr.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bush-Pirates/442420559208370
- published: 29 Sep 2015
- views: 25406
Trident- Does Britain need our Submerged Weapons of Nuclear War
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. On the week that Labour intend to debate whether the UK needs to spend a 100 million on renewing our nuclear fleet ...
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. On the week that Labour intend to debate whether the UK needs to spend a 100 million on renewing our nuclear fleet we look at whether the our Government even pushes the buttons on our weapons of mass destruction. Plus why is an American nuclear sub docked in the waters of Scotland?
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
wn.com/Trident Does Britain Need Our Submerged Weapons Of Nuclear War
Afshin Rattansi goes underground on Trident. On the week that Labour intend to debate whether the UK needs to spend a 100 million on renewing our nuclear fleet we look at whether the our Government even pushes the buttons on our weapons of mass destruction. Plus why is an American nuclear sub docked in the waters of Scotland?
LIKE Going Underground http://fb.me/GoingUndergroundRT
FOLLOW Going Underground http://twitter.com/Underground_RT
FOLLOW Afshin Rattansi http://twitter.com/AfshinRattansi
FOLLOW on Instagram http://instagram.com/officialgoingundergroundrt
- published: 28 Sep 2015
- views: 215
Corbyn Facing Trident Defeat At Union Hands
Jeremy Corbyn looks like he is heading for defeat on scrapping Trident after the Unite union - the party's biggest financial backer - said it would vote to keep...
Jeremy Corbyn looks like he is heading for defeat on scrapping Trident after the Unite union - the party's biggest financial backer - said it would vote to keep the nuclear deterrent.
Len McCluskey, who backed Mr Corbyn's leadership campaign, told Sky News he would vote to protect jobs.
He said: "Everyone would love the whole world to get rid of nuclear weapons - we understand the moral arguments and cost arguments in these days of austerity.
"However, the most important thing for us is to protect jobs. In the absence of any credible alternative to protect jobs and high skills we will vote against any anti-Trident resolution."
wn.com/Corbyn Facing Trident Defeat At Union Hands
Jeremy Corbyn looks like he is heading for defeat on scrapping Trident after the Unite union - the party's biggest financial backer - said it would vote to keep the nuclear deterrent.
Len McCluskey, who backed Mr Corbyn's leadership campaign, told Sky News he would vote to protect jobs.
He said: "Everyone would love the whole world to get rid of nuclear weapons - we understand the moral arguments and cost arguments in these days of austerity.
"However, the most important thing for us is to protect jobs. In the absence of any credible alternative to protect jobs and high skills we will vote against any anti-Trident resolution."
- published: 27 Sep 2015
- views: 30
Corbyn Hints He Will Accept Split On Trident
Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Labour MPs might be given a free vote on scrapping the Trident nuclear deterrent because of the shadow cabinet split on the issue.
...
Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Labour MPs might be given a free vote on scrapping the Trident nuclear deterrent because of the shadow cabinet split on the issue.
The Labour leader accepted he may not be able to unite the party on his no-nukes policy and conceded he would probably have to "come to an accommodation of some sort".
Speaking on the first day of the party's conference in Brighton, he asked if it was "so disastrous" for a party to have "two different opinions" on an issue.
However, he added: "I will do my persuasive best to bring them around to my point of view."
Mr Corbyn told the Andrew Marr Show he had been opposed to "weapons of mass destruction" all of his life but he understood the views of shadow cabinet colleagues.
:: The Six Issues That Could Split Labour
Labour ditched its no-nukes policy under Neil Kinnock in 1989 but is expected to debate the issue at conference on Monday.
The Government must decide whether to renew Trident at a cost of £20bn next year and wants to press ahead.
Mr Corbyn's opposition puts him at loggerheads with some of the unions, who backed his leadership campaign, and they have warned him to "get real" over the issue .
:: Labour Party Conference LIVE
If the Trident programme is not renewed then the jobs of 40,000 defence workers at Faslane will be in jeopardy.
However, Unison leader Dave Prentis said Trident did not need to be renewed, it could be kept running and that other public services should not be sacrificed to pay for the defence programme.
And Mr Corbyn denied that scrapping Trident would put jobs at risk.
In a wide-ranging interview Mr Corbyn also:
:: Said he would like to see a 50p tax rate for those earning over £100,000.
:: Confirmed he supported a united Ireland, refused to deny he "wanted the IRA to win" and said he invited Sinn Fein members to the Commons shortly after the Brighton bombings in 1984 to try to find a political solution.
:: Told how he had thrown policy-making open to grassroots supporters saying there were a lot of people with good ideas out there.
:: Denied being a supporter of Russian president Vladimir Putin.
:: Spoke against taking military action in Syria, another issue where he disagrees with key members of his shadow cabinet.
:: Suggested introducing a graded, effectively means-tested inheritance tax system.
In response to Mr Corbyn's interview, Business Secretary Sajid Javid said: "The Labour leader confirmed that he would weaken our defences by scrapping our independent nuclear deterrent and that he would damage our economy by putting up taxes on jobs, earnings, investment and people's homes.
"This shows the Labour Party are a serious risk to our national security, our economic security and to the security of all working people."
wn.com/Corbyn Hints He Will Accept Split On Trident
Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Labour MPs might be given a free vote on scrapping the Trident nuclear deterrent because of the shadow cabinet split on the issue.
The Labour leader accepted he may not be able to unite the party on his no-nukes policy and conceded he would probably have to "come to an accommodation of some sort".
Speaking on the first day of the party's conference in Brighton, he asked if it was "so disastrous" for a party to have "two different opinions" on an issue.
However, he added: "I will do my persuasive best to bring them around to my point of view."
Mr Corbyn told the Andrew Marr Show he had been opposed to "weapons of mass destruction" all of his life but he understood the views of shadow cabinet colleagues.
:: The Six Issues That Could Split Labour
Labour ditched its no-nukes policy under Neil Kinnock in 1989 but is expected to debate the issue at conference on Monday.
The Government must decide whether to renew Trident at a cost of £20bn next year and wants to press ahead.
Mr Corbyn's opposition puts him at loggerheads with some of the unions, who backed his leadership campaign, and they have warned him to "get real" over the issue .
:: Labour Party Conference LIVE
If the Trident programme is not renewed then the jobs of 40,000 defence workers at Faslane will be in jeopardy.
However, Unison leader Dave Prentis said Trident did not need to be renewed, it could be kept running and that other public services should not be sacrificed to pay for the defence programme.
And Mr Corbyn denied that scrapping Trident would put jobs at risk.
In a wide-ranging interview Mr Corbyn also:
:: Said he would like to see a 50p tax rate for those earning over £100,000.
:: Confirmed he supported a united Ireland, refused to deny he "wanted the IRA to win" and said he invited Sinn Fein members to the Commons shortly after the Brighton bombings in 1984 to try to find a political solution.
:: Told how he had thrown policy-making open to grassroots supporters saying there were a lot of people with good ideas out there.
:: Denied being a supporter of Russian president Vladimir Putin.
:: Spoke against taking military action in Syria, another issue where he disagrees with key members of his shadow cabinet.
:: Suggested introducing a graded, effectively means-tested inheritance tax system.
In response to Mr Corbyn's interview, Business Secretary Sajid Javid said: "The Labour leader confirmed that he would weaken our defences by scrapping our independent nuclear deterrent and that he would damage our economy by putting up taxes on jobs, earnings, investment and people's homes.
"This shows the Labour Party are a serious risk to our national security, our economic security and to the security of all working people."
- published: 27 Sep 2015
- views: 181
Corbyn Hints He Will Accept Split On Trident
The Labour leader suggests he might let key members of his shadow cabinet rebel in a Commons vote on the nuclear deterrent....
The Labour leader suggests he might let key members of his shadow cabinet rebel in a Commons vote on the nuclear deterrent.
wn.com/Corbyn Hints He Will Accept Split On Trident
The Labour leader suggests he might let key members of his shadow cabinet rebel in a Commons vote on the nuclear deterrent.
- published: 27 Sep 2015
- views: 9
LIVE : Jeremy Corbyn outlines views on Trident with Andrew Marr
Jeremy Corbyn has moved to calm tensions within the Labour party over Trident by saying that he will reach an “accommodation of some sort” that could allow memb...
Jeremy Corbyn has moved to calm tensions within the Labour party over Trident by saying that he will reach an “accommodation of some sort” that could allow members of the shadow cabinet to support the renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent.
As Labour conference organisers meet behind closed doors in Brighton to decide whether to hold a vote on Trident, the Labour leader said he saw nothing wrong with frontbenchers expressing different views
wn.com/Live Jeremy Corbyn Outlines Views On Trident With Andrew Marr
Jeremy Corbyn has moved to calm tensions within the Labour party over Trident by saying that he will reach an “accommodation of some sort” that could allow members of the shadow cabinet to support the renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent.
As Labour conference organisers meet behind closed doors in Brighton to decide whether to hold a vote on Trident, the Labour leader said he saw nothing wrong with frontbenchers expressing different views
- published: 27 Sep 2015
- views: 90
Jeremy Corbyn will work with SNP to remove Trident
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he is willing to work with the SNP to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland.
Speaking to BBC Scotland, Mr Corbyn reaffirmed...
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he is willing to work with the SNP to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland.
Speaking to BBC Scotland, Mr Corbyn reaffirmed his long-standing opposition to Trident and said he would vote with the SNP at Westminster on the issue.
Mr Corbyn said he would like to see jobs associated with nuclear defence in Scotland transferred to other forms of high-value engineering.
The new party leader will be travelling to Scotland next week.
Mr Corbyn won a decisive victory over his three rivals in the UK Labour leadership contest earlier this month, taking 59.5% of the votes cast.
In his victory speech he promised to campaign in Scotland for those "great Labour traditions".
'Own principles'
Making his first in-depth comments on Scottish issues since being elected, the Labour leader acknowledged that Trident was a controversial matter and said it would be debated at the party's conference in Brighton next week.
"My position on Trident has been very clear all of my life," he said.
We have recruited a lot of members to the party in Scotland
Jeremy Corbyn, Labour leader
"I think Trident should go. I do not believe that it is a form of defence. I do not believe it is something that anyone in their proper mind would ever want to use, so I ask the question is it really sensible to commit such a vast proportion of our assets - £100bn over 25 years - to this when we could be spending it on developing our industrial infrastructure?"
Asked if it was an issue he could work with the SNP on, Mr Corbyn said: "In the House of Commons I was chair of the CND group and one of the vice chairs is from the SNP and yes we will be voting with them on this, or they will be voting with us, whichever way you want to put it."
The SNP's deputy leader Stewart Hosie said he was "very pleased, but not surprised" by Mr Corbyn's stance on Trident.
"His big challenge comes in persuading his party conference that it is the right thing to do and of course his shadow cabinet, including his shadow defence secretary, who of course has previously voted for Trident renewal," Mr Hosie said.
"This a welcome sign that he is prepared to stick to his own principles, and if we can work with the Labour party, if they are prepared to vote with us to remove Trident, then that would be a great result for the people of the UK."
Rebuild support
In August, Chancellor George Osborne was accused of pre-empting parliament's decision on the replacement of Trident by announcing more than £500m of contracts for the Royal Navy's submarine base at Faslane on the Clyde.
Writing in the Sun newspaper then, Mr Osborne said the political consensus that Britain needed a nuclear deterrent "risks being shattered again by an unholy alliance of Labour's left-wing insurgents and the Scottish nationalists".
In the BBC interview, Mr Corbyn also said his priority was to rebuild Labour support in Scotland.
"I will be in Scotland next week campaigning on issues of jobs, issues of security, issues of welfare and issues that affect ordinary people in Scotland, particularly health inequalities," he said.
"For the moment what we are doing is building Labour support in Scotland and it is going very well. We have recruited a lot of members to the party in Scotland."
wn.com/Jeremy Corbyn Will Work With Snp To Remove Trident
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he is willing to work with the SNP to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland.
Speaking to BBC Scotland, Mr Corbyn reaffirmed his long-standing opposition to Trident and said he would vote with the SNP at Westminster on the issue.
Mr Corbyn said he would like to see jobs associated with nuclear defence in Scotland transferred to other forms of high-value engineering.
The new party leader will be travelling to Scotland next week.
Mr Corbyn won a decisive victory over his three rivals in the UK Labour leadership contest earlier this month, taking 59.5% of the votes cast.
In his victory speech he promised to campaign in Scotland for those "great Labour traditions".
'Own principles'
Making his first in-depth comments on Scottish issues since being elected, the Labour leader acknowledged that Trident was a controversial matter and said it would be debated at the party's conference in Brighton next week.
"My position on Trident has been very clear all of my life," he said.
We have recruited a lot of members to the party in Scotland
Jeremy Corbyn, Labour leader
"I think Trident should go. I do not believe that it is a form of defence. I do not believe it is something that anyone in their proper mind would ever want to use, so I ask the question is it really sensible to commit such a vast proportion of our assets - £100bn over 25 years - to this when we could be spending it on developing our industrial infrastructure?"
Asked if it was an issue he could work with the SNP on, Mr Corbyn said: "In the House of Commons I was chair of the CND group and one of the vice chairs is from the SNP and yes we will be voting with them on this, or they will be voting with us, whichever way you want to put it."
The SNP's deputy leader Stewart Hosie said he was "very pleased, but not surprised" by Mr Corbyn's stance on Trident.
"His big challenge comes in persuading his party conference that it is the right thing to do and of course his shadow cabinet, including his shadow defence secretary, who of course has previously voted for Trident renewal," Mr Hosie said.
"This a welcome sign that he is prepared to stick to his own principles, and if we can work with the Labour party, if they are prepared to vote with us to remove Trident, then that would be a great result for the people of the UK."
Rebuild support
In August, Chancellor George Osborne was accused of pre-empting parliament's decision on the replacement of Trident by announcing more than £500m of contracts for the Royal Navy's submarine base at Faslane on the Clyde.
Writing in the Sun newspaper then, Mr Osborne said the political consensus that Britain needed a nuclear deterrent "risks being shattered again by an unholy alliance of Labour's left-wing insurgents and the Scottish nationalists".
In the BBC interview, Mr Corbyn also said his priority was to rebuild Labour support in Scotland.
"I will be in Scotland next week campaigning on issues of jobs, issues of security, issues of welfare and issues that affect ordinary people in Scotland, particularly health inequalities," he said.
"For the moment what we are doing is building Labour support in Scotland and it is going very well. We have recruited a lot of members to the party in Scotland."
- published: 25 Sep 2015
- views: 66
-
LIVE: Thousands protest Trident nuclear weapons replacement
Thousands of people are expected to demonstrate in the streets of London against the British government’s plan to renew the Trident nuclear weapons system at an estimated cost of £100 bn. Comedian and activist Russell Brand is expected to participate in the protest, scheduled for January 24. Britain has been debating the necessity of replacing the Trident submarine fleet that’s armed with intercon
-
Bruce Kent on Trident nuclear weapons
Bruce Kent talking on the reasons why the renewal of the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system is not a deterrent to any state, reduces our security, and will cost a bomb.
-
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried
-
Danny Alexander on the Trident Alternative Review
Rt Hon Danny Alexander MP, Chief Secretary to the Treasury and lead Minister of the Trident Alternatives Review, delivered a speech on the 'Alternative Approaches to the UK's Nuclear Future'.
The UK's current nuclear force -- centred on four Vanguard submarines maintaining a continuous at-sea deterrent -- will come to the end of its service life in the late 2020s. Responding to this timeline, the
-
Britain: Should Cameron scrap the UK's nuclear weapons?-The Agenda-01-28-2012
http://presstv.ir/Program/223721.html
Britain's nuclear arsenal will cost £20 billion to renew - it's a sum of money which could stave off the recession threatening to engulf the UK economy.
Former military chiefs have previously admitted Britain's nuclear submarines are completely useless against modern warfare and a waste of money.
Nuclear weapons are no deterrent to the threat posed
-
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
Documentary,201
-
Trident Missiles Nuclear Submarine - Hi-Tech Weaponry
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile
-
Trident: The Debate. A Mock Trial. 23 June 2011
What should the UK do with its Trident submarines? Is there still a role for the nuclear deterrent? Can we afford it? A distinguished panel of experts debated this issue at the RSE, with an impartial 'judge' overseeing proceedings.
-
VOICE OF RUSSIA, LONDON: After Trident - a new future for Britain's nukes?
Until last month, Britain's nuclear deterrent -- currently the Trident submarine missile system - was low down the agenda in most newsrooms.
But the suggestion by the Liberal Democrat, Sir Nick Harvey, that the replacement for Trident could be a cheaper, downgraded version has ignited the debate over Britain's nuclear weapons.
Sir Nick's words had added punch because until last month he was a m
-
BBC HARDtalk: Nuclear Deterrent Discussion with Kate Hudson and Douglas Murray
-
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nuclear deterrence justify their keeping them?
Nuclear deterrence is based on the assumption that in moments of extreme national crisis attacks against cities (or the threat of attacks against cities) will matter. Much of our thinking about t
-
Nuclear Weapons Threaten Life And Waste Money
The Cold War ended more than 20 years ago, and the Soviet Union no longer exists. But the U.S. is still fighting this obsolete Cold War with very dangerous and very expensive nuclear weapons.
Politicians and mainstream news media occasionally provoke fear about other countries that have -- or might possibly want -- nuclear weapons. But that is fear-mongering. There is no thoughtful conversatio
-
Corsham Computer Centre UNWANTED VISIT
We decided to take a trip down to the super secret Corsham Computer Centre which is an underground complex which is apparently a Nuclear Command and Control centre for the British Military. Very easy to access from the main road the facility has opted for a "low key" approach not advertising its presence with any Keep Out signs or warnings that you shouldn't be there. This means that you can get e
-
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011.
Michael Quinlan's career in the British civil service spanned three decades, during which time he advised various governments, including those of James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher. He was closely involved in the decision to procure Trident from the United St
-
Poseidon Seminar 2012
The Poseidon Seminars are an annual event, where all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a nuclear weapons-free world, can come together in serious intellectual discussion and debate. The huge costs of refitting Trident and the question of who will pay for it, and whether this money could be more usefully spen
-
Successor to the UK Trident system
The Successor programme is a British programme to replace the Vanguard-class of ballistic missile submarines, which began to enter service in 1992 with a 25 year intended service life. These submarines currently carry the Trident D5 ballistic missiles, which are now the sole delivery vehicle for the UK's nuclear weapons. The submarine is currently referred to as Successor. Replacement of the Vangu
-
Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines: "Our Crucial Deterrent" 1973 US Navy
more at http://quickfound.net/links/military_news_and_links.html
On the upgrading of Polaris SSBN nuclear submarines to carry the Poseidon missile. Includes history of the Polaris SSBNs, development of the solid rocket motor and launch hardware, prior attempts to place missiles on subs (Regulus missiles), and Admiral Raborn at the first successful undersea launch of a missile from a submarine. S
-
Poseidon Seminar 2011 Part 2 - Janet Fenton
The Poseidon Seminars are for all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a nuclear weapons-free world. The huge costs of refitting Trident and the question of who will pay for it, and whether this money could be more usefully spent, are among the many topics debated.
The event is hosted by the Centre for Peace
-
Nuke Syndrome (A Modern-Day Disaster: Nuclear Weapons as the Currency of Global Power)
“Israel, probably more than any other state in the world has had more resolutions past against it and has broken those resolutions and yet it seems to be able to exist without any sanctions because it is protected by the United States,” this thought-provoking statement made by Paul Ingram puts the contradictory scenario of nowadays world about nuclear bombs into perspective. Paul Ingram is the exe
-
Imperial Partnership: UK to build more nuclear weapons: 'the ultimate insurance policy'!?
07.04.2013 Nuke is not a deterrent, contrary... it is most deadly weapon, to war against entire humanity. While people are taxed for bedrooms... Queen get rise of salary... Cameron build more weapons of mass destruction, using Korea for pretest to arm, for colonial take over, by nuke enforced ...NWO imperial aims must be halted Decommission all Nuke weapon Worldwide...End Nuclear Era. It is possib
-
US Navy NUCLEAR ARMED submarine documentry
An interesting documentary on US navy nuclear armed submarines produced by the pentagon channel. Composition of the current force[edit]
Ohio class (18 in commission) — 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), 4 guided missile submarines (SSGNs)
Virginia class (11 in commission, 5 under construction, 2 on order) — fast attack submarines
Seawolf class (3 in commission) — attack submarines
Los Angele
LIVE: Thousands protest Trident nuclear weapons replacement
Thousands of people are expected to demonstrate in the streets of London against the British government’s plan to renew the Trident nuclear weapons system at an...
Thousands of people are expected to demonstrate in the streets of London against the British government’s plan to renew the Trident nuclear weapons system at an estimated cost of £100 bn. Comedian and activist Russell Brand is expected to participate in the protest, scheduled for January 24. Britain has been debating the necessity of replacing the Trident submarine fleet that’s armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To use this footage please contact the Ruptly Client Desk: cd@ruptly.tv
Video ID:
----------------------------------
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Ruptly
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Ruptly
LiveLeak: http://www.liveleak.com/c/Ruptly
Vine: https://vine.co/Ruptly
Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/Ruptly
Google Plus: http://google.com/+RuptlyTV
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/RuptlyTV
DailyMotion: http://www.dailymotion.com/ruptly
Video on Demand: http://www.ruptly.tv
wn.com/Live Thousands Protest Trident Nuclear Weapons Replacement
Thousands of people are expected to demonstrate in the streets of London against the British government’s plan to renew the Trident nuclear weapons system at an estimated cost of £100 bn. Comedian and activist Russell Brand is expected to participate in the protest, scheduled for January 24. Britain has been debating the necessity of replacing the Trident submarine fleet that’s armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To use this footage please contact the Ruptly Client Desk: cd@ruptly.tv
Video ID:
----------------------------------
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Ruptly
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Ruptly
LiveLeak: http://www.liveleak.com/c/Ruptly
Vine: https://vine.co/Ruptly
Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/Ruptly
Google Plus: http://google.com/+RuptlyTV
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/RuptlyTV
DailyMotion: http://www.dailymotion.com/ruptly
Video on Demand: http://www.ruptly.tv
- published: 24 Jan 2015
- views: 1646
Bruce Kent on Trident nuclear weapons
Bruce Kent talking on the reasons why the renewal of the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system is not a deterrent to any state, reduces our security, and will cos...
Bruce Kent talking on the reasons why the renewal of the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system is not a deterrent to any state, reduces our security, and will cost a bomb.
wn.com/Bruce Kent On Trident Nuclear Weapons
Bruce Kent talking on the reasons why the renewal of the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system is not a deterrent to any state, reduces our security, and will cost a bomb.
- published: 18 Nov 2012
- views: 122
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) e...
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (designated C4) was deployed in 1979 and retired in 2005. Its objective was to achieve performance similar to Poseidon (C3) but at extended range which improved survivability of the submarine. Trident II (designated D5) had the objective of improved accuracy, and was first deployed in 1990, and was planned to be in service for the thirty-year life of the submarines, until 2027.
Trident missiles are provided to the United Kingdom under the terms of the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement which was modified in 1982 for Trident. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher wrote to President Carter on 10 July 1980, to request that he approve supply of Trident I missiles. However, in 1982 Thatcher wrote to President Reagan to request the United Kingdom be allowed to procure the Trident II system, the procurement of which had been accelerated by the US Navy. This was agreed in March 1982. Under the agreement, the United Kingdom paid an additional 5% of their total procurement cost of 2.5 billion dollars to the US government as a research and development contribution.
The launch from the submarine occurs below the ocean surface. The missiles are ejected from their tubes by igniting an explosive charge in a separate container which is separated by seventeen titanium alloy pinnacles activated by a double alloy steam system. The energy from the blast is directed to a water tank, which is flash-vaporized to steam. The subsequent pressure spike is strong enough to eject the missile out of the tube and give it enough momentum to reach and clear the surface of the water. The missile is pressurized with nitrogen to prevent the intrusion of water into any internal spaces, which could damage the missile or add weight, destabilizing the missile. Should the missile fail to breach the surface of the water, there are several safety mechanisms that can either deactivate the missile before launch or guide the missile through an additional phase of launch. Inertial motion sensors are activated upon launch, and when the sensors detect downward acceleration after being blown out of the water, the first stage engine ignites. The aerospike, a telescoping outward extension that halves aerodynamic drag, is then deployed, and the boost phase begins. When the third stage motor fires, within two minutes of launch, the missile is traveling faster than 20,000 ft/s (6,000 m/s), or 13,600 mph (21,600 km/h).
The missile attains a temporary low altitude orbit only a few minutes after launch. The Guidance System for the missile was developed by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory and is maintained by a joint Draper/General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems facility. It is an Inertial Guidance System with an additional Star-Sighting system, which is used to correct small position and velocity errors that result from launch condition uncertainties due to the sub navigation system errors and some errors that have accrued by the guidance system during the flight due to imperfect instrument calibration. GPS has been used on some test flights but is assumed not to be available for a real mission. The fire control system was designed and continues to be maintained by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems.
Once the Star-sighting has been completed, the "bus" section of the missile maneuvers to achieve the various velocity vectors that will send the deployed multiple independent reentry vehicles to their individual targets. The downrange and crossrange dispersion of the targets remains classified.
The Trident was built in two variants: the I (C4) UGM-96A and II (D5) UGM-133A, however there is no direct relation between these two missiles. While the C4, formerly known as EXPO (Extended Range Poseidon), is just an improved version of the Poseidon C-3 missile, the Trident II D-5 has a completely new design (although with some technologies adopted from the C-4). The C4 and D5 designations put the missiles within the "family" that started in 1960 with Polaris (A1, A2 and A3) and continued with the 1971 Poseidon (C3). Both Trident versions are three-stage, solid-propellant, inertially guided missiles, and both guidance systems use a star sighting to improve overall weapons system accuracy.
wn.com/The Trident Missile System Modern High Tech Weapons
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (designated C4) was deployed in 1979 and retired in 2005. Its objective was to achieve performance similar to Poseidon (C3) but at extended range which improved survivability of the submarine. Trident II (designated D5) had the objective of improved accuracy, and was first deployed in 1990, and was planned to be in service for the thirty-year life of the submarines, until 2027.
Trident missiles are provided to the United Kingdom under the terms of the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement which was modified in 1982 for Trident. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher wrote to President Carter on 10 July 1980, to request that he approve supply of Trident I missiles. However, in 1982 Thatcher wrote to President Reagan to request the United Kingdom be allowed to procure the Trident II system, the procurement of which had been accelerated by the US Navy. This was agreed in March 1982. Under the agreement, the United Kingdom paid an additional 5% of their total procurement cost of 2.5 billion dollars to the US government as a research and development contribution.
The launch from the submarine occurs below the ocean surface. The missiles are ejected from their tubes by igniting an explosive charge in a separate container which is separated by seventeen titanium alloy pinnacles activated by a double alloy steam system. The energy from the blast is directed to a water tank, which is flash-vaporized to steam. The subsequent pressure spike is strong enough to eject the missile out of the tube and give it enough momentum to reach and clear the surface of the water. The missile is pressurized with nitrogen to prevent the intrusion of water into any internal spaces, which could damage the missile or add weight, destabilizing the missile. Should the missile fail to breach the surface of the water, there are several safety mechanisms that can either deactivate the missile before launch or guide the missile through an additional phase of launch. Inertial motion sensors are activated upon launch, and when the sensors detect downward acceleration after being blown out of the water, the first stage engine ignites. The aerospike, a telescoping outward extension that halves aerodynamic drag, is then deployed, and the boost phase begins. When the third stage motor fires, within two minutes of launch, the missile is traveling faster than 20,000 ft/s (6,000 m/s), or 13,600 mph (21,600 km/h).
The missile attains a temporary low altitude orbit only a few minutes after launch. The Guidance System for the missile was developed by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory and is maintained by a joint Draper/General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems facility. It is an Inertial Guidance System with an additional Star-Sighting system, which is used to correct small position and velocity errors that result from launch condition uncertainties due to the sub navigation system errors and some errors that have accrued by the guidance system during the flight due to imperfect instrument calibration. GPS has been used on some test flights but is assumed not to be available for a real mission. The fire control system was designed and continues to be maintained by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems.
Once the Star-sighting has been completed, the "bus" section of the missile maneuvers to achieve the various velocity vectors that will send the deployed multiple independent reentry vehicles to their individual targets. The downrange and crossrange dispersion of the targets remains classified.
The Trident was built in two variants: the I (C4) UGM-96A and II (D5) UGM-133A, however there is no direct relation between these two missiles. While the C4, formerly known as EXPO (Extended Range Poseidon), is just an improved version of the Poseidon C-3 missile, the Trident II D-5 has a completely new design (although with some technologies adopted from the C-4). The C4 and D5 designations put the missiles within the "family" that started in 1960 with Polaris (A1, A2 and A3) and continued with the 1971 Poseidon (C3). Both Trident versions are three-stage, solid-propellant, inertially guided missiles, and both guidance systems use a star sighting to improve overall weapons system accuracy.
- published: 02 Jun 2014
- views: 662
Danny Alexander on the Trident Alternative Review
Rt Hon Danny Alexander MP, Chief Secretary to the Treasury and lead Minister of the Trident Alternatives Review, delivered a speech on the 'Alternative Approach...
Rt Hon Danny Alexander MP, Chief Secretary to the Treasury and lead Minister of the Trident Alternatives Review, delivered a speech on the 'Alternative Approaches to the UK's Nuclear Future'.
The UK's current nuclear force -- centred on four Vanguard submarines maintaining a continuous at-sea deterrent -- will come to the end of its service life in the late 2020s. Responding to this timeline, the UK began a process in 2007 to determine the future of the UK's nuclear force, which will conclude in 2016 with a 'Main Gate' decision by the next parliament.
While the current UK Coalition Government agreed that it would maintain Britain's nuclear deterrent, the Liberal Democrats have long argued the case for alternatives to the current system and posture. Mr Alexander's speech highlighted the approach and conclusions of the recently completed Trident Alternatives Review.
wn.com/Danny Alexander On The Trident Alternative Review
Rt Hon Danny Alexander MP, Chief Secretary to the Treasury and lead Minister of the Trident Alternatives Review, delivered a speech on the 'Alternative Approaches to the UK's Nuclear Future'.
The UK's current nuclear force -- centred on four Vanguard submarines maintaining a continuous at-sea deterrent -- will come to the end of its service life in the late 2020s. Responding to this timeline, the UK began a process in 2007 to determine the future of the UK's nuclear force, which will conclude in 2016 with a 'Main Gate' decision by the next parliament.
While the current UK Coalition Government agreed that it would maintain Britain's nuclear deterrent, the Liberal Democrats have long argued the case for alternatives to the current system and posture. Mr Alexander's speech highlighted the approach and conclusions of the recently completed Trident Alternatives Review.
- published: 17 Jul 2013
- views: 689
Britain: Should Cameron scrap the UK's nuclear weapons?-The Agenda-01-28-2012
http://presstv.ir/Program/223721.html
Britain's nuclear arsenal will cost £20 billion to renew - it's a sum of money which could stave off the recession thre...
http://presstv.ir/Program/223721.html
Britain's nuclear arsenal will cost £20 billion to renew - it's a sum of money which could stave off the recession threatening to engulf the UK economy.
Former military chiefs have previously admitted Britain's nuclear submarines are completely useless against modern warfare and a waste of money.
Nuclear weapons are no deterrent to the threat posed by international terrorism. Cameron's decision to renew ¬Trident is said to be driven more by political considerations for the UK's American allies than by the true requirements of national defence.
In this edition of the show we ask: Is it now the time for Cameron to make the biggest cut of all by scrapping Trident and saving Britain from further hardship?
wn.com/Britain Should Cameron Scrap The Uk's Nuclear Weapons The Agenda 01 28 2012
http://presstv.ir/Program/223721.html
Britain's nuclear arsenal will cost £20 billion to renew - it's a sum of money which could stave off the recession threatening to engulf the UK economy.
Former military chiefs have previously admitted Britain's nuclear submarines are completely useless against modern warfare and a waste of money.
Nuclear weapons are no deterrent to the threat posed by international terrorism. Cameron's decision to renew ¬Trident is said to be driven more by political considerations for the UK's American allies than by the true requirements of national defence.
In this edition of the show we ask: Is it now the time for Cameron to make the biggest cut of all by scrapping Trident and saving Britain from further hardship?
- published: 29 Jan 2012
- views: 2649
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrenc...
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
Documentary,2015, Full Documentary, New Documentary, Top Documentaries, Documentaries,HD,2015, documentary films,documentary,
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
wn.com/The Trident Missile System Modern High Tech Weapons Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
Documentary,2015, Full Documentary, New Documentary, Top Documentaries, Documentaries,HD,2015, documentary films,documentary,
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile .
- published: 14 Oct 2015
- views: 21
Trident Missiles Nuclear Submarine - Hi-Tech Weaponry
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile...
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile
wn.com/Trident Missiles Nuclear Submarine Hi Tech Weaponry
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence. The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile
- published: 03 Aug 2015
- views: 11
Trident: The Debate. A Mock Trial. 23 June 2011
What should the UK do with its Trident submarines? Is there still a role for the nuclear deterrent? Can we afford it? A distinguished panel of experts debated t...
What should the UK do with its Trident submarines? Is there still a role for the nuclear deterrent? Can we afford it? A distinguished panel of experts debated this issue at the RSE, with an impartial 'judge' overseeing proceedings.
wn.com/Trident The Debate. A Mock Trial. 23 June 2011
What should the UK do with its Trident submarines? Is there still a role for the nuclear deterrent? Can we afford it? A distinguished panel of experts debated this issue at the RSE, with an impartial 'judge' overseeing proceedings.
- published: 04 Jul 2011
- views: 165
VOICE OF RUSSIA, LONDON: After Trident - a new future for Britain's nukes?
Until last month, Britain's nuclear deterrent -- currently the Trident submarine missile system - was low down the agenda in most newsrooms.
But the suggestio...
Until last month, Britain's nuclear deterrent -- currently the Trident submarine missile system - was low down the agenda in most newsrooms.
But the suggestion by the Liberal Democrat, Sir Nick Harvey, that the replacement for Trident could be a cheaper, downgraded version has ignited the debate over Britain's nuclear weapons.
Sir Nick's words had added punch because until last month he was a minister in the Ministry of Defence, leading a government review of Trident's successor.
He's argued that there's a strong financial and military imperative for that downgrading, arguing it's possible to save money, while keeping the country safe.
So is that possible? And, more fundamentally, is the end of Trident an opportunity to discuss getting rid of Britain's nuclear weapons altogether?
VOR's Hywel Davis discusses this with Dr Kate Hudson, General Secretary for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND); Toby Fenwick, research associate at CentreForum and the author of the report 'Dropping the bomb: a post Trident future'; Dr Julian Lewis, Conservative MP and the Shadow Defence Minister from 2002 to 2010 and Benjamin Harris-Quinney, chairman and research fellow in international security and global affairs at the Bow Group think tank.
http://ruvr.co.uk/
Photo: Getty Images
wn.com/Voice Of Russia, London After Trident A New Future For Britain's Nukes
Until last month, Britain's nuclear deterrent -- currently the Trident submarine missile system - was low down the agenda in most newsrooms.
But the suggestion by the Liberal Democrat, Sir Nick Harvey, that the replacement for Trident could be a cheaper, downgraded version has ignited the debate over Britain's nuclear weapons.
Sir Nick's words had added punch because until last month he was a minister in the Ministry of Defence, leading a government review of Trident's successor.
He's argued that there's a strong financial and military imperative for that downgrading, arguing it's possible to save money, while keeping the country safe.
So is that possible? And, more fundamentally, is the end of Trident an opportunity to discuss getting rid of Britain's nuclear weapons altogether?
VOR's Hywel Davis discusses this with Dr Kate Hudson, General Secretary for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND); Toby Fenwick, research associate at CentreForum and the author of the report 'Dropping the bomb: a post Trident future'; Dr Julian Lewis, Conservative MP and the Shadow Defence Minister from 2002 to 2010 and Benjamin Harris-Quinney, chairman and research fellow in international security and global affairs at the Bow Group think tank.
http://ruvr.co.uk/
Photo: Getty Images
- published: 05 Oct 2012
- views: 2274
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nucle...
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nuclear deterrence justify their keeping them?
Nuclear deterrence is based on the assumption that in moments of extreme national crisis attacks against cities (or the threat of attacks against cities) will matter. Much of our thinking about this question, however, ignores the available evidence and recent reinterpretations of important cases.
New Jersey-based independent scholar Ward Wilson, winner of the 2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge, will offer a critique of nuclear deterrence and a detailed discussion of the historical evidence that contradicts the concept.
wn.com/The Myth Of Nuclear Deterrence
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nuclear deterrence justify their keeping them?
Nuclear deterrence is based on the assumption that in moments of extreme national crisis attacks against cities (or the threat of attacks against cities) will matter. Much of our thinking about this question, however, ignores the available evidence and recent reinterpretations of important cases.
New Jersey-based independent scholar Ward Wilson, winner of the 2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge, will offer a critique of nuclear deterrence and a detailed discussion of the historical evidence that contradicts the concept.
- published: 24 Jul 2008
- views: 5842
Nuclear Weapons Threaten Life And Waste Money
The Cold War ended more than 20 years ago, and the Soviet Union no longer exists. But the U.S. is still fighting this obsolete Cold War with very dangerous and...
The Cold War ended more than 20 years ago, and the Soviet Union no longer exists. But the U.S. is still fighting this obsolete Cold War with very dangerous and very expensive nuclear weapons.
Politicians and mainstream news media occasionally provoke fear about other countries that have -- or might possibly want -- nuclear weapons. But that is fear-mongering. There is no thoughtful conversation in Congress, or in the media, or among the general public about nuclear weapons.
The Olympia Fellowship of Reconciliation's March 2013 TCTV program brings viewers up to date. We especially focus on the Trident nuclear submarines based at the Navy base at Bangor in Kitsap County, just 60 miles north of Olympia and 20 miles west of Seattle. Tridents are always on hair-trigger alert and poised for a suicidal first strike against Russia or some other target. If used, the Trident submarine could destroy the world. So it's worth spending an hour watching this program!
During the Vietnam war, the port at Bangor was used for shipping a large portion of the weapons and ammunition for use there. A small nonviolent group called the People's Blockade protested there and blocked the railroad tracks and the ocean-going freighters.
During the Cold War our suicidal nuclear policy was actually called "Mutually Assured Destruction." We discuss the US's nuclear weapons after the Cold War, including Trident and the others designed specifically for a "first strike," to actually begin a nuclear war.
Tom Rogers tells his own personal experience commanding a nuclear submarine and how he changed his mind. Leonard Eiger shares his own reasons for working for nuclear disarmament.
Our two guests have been working hard to abolish nuclear weapons, especially the Trident system, through the Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, which is located immediately next to the Trident base.
wn.com/Nuclear Weapons Threaten Life And Waste Money
The Cold War ended more than 20 years ago, and the Soviet Union no longer exists. But the U.S. is still fighting this obsolete Cold War with very dangerous and very expensive nuclear weapons.
Politicians and mainstream news media occasionally provoke fear about other countries that have -- or might possibly want -- nuclear weapons. But that is fear-mongering. There is no thoughtful conversation in Congress, or in the media, or among the general public about nuclear weapons.
The Olympia Fellowship of Reconciliation's March 2013 TCTV program brings viewers up to date. We especially focus on the Trident nuclear submarines based at the Navy base at Bangor in Kitsap County, just 60 miles north of Olympia and 20 miles west of Seattle. Tridents are always on hair-trigger alert and poised for a suicidal first strike against Russia or some other target. If used, the Trident submarine could destroy the world. So it's worth spending an hour watching this program!
During the Vietnam war, the port at Bangor was used for shipping a large portion of the weapons and ammunition for use there. A small nonviolent group called the People's Blockade protested there and blocked the railroad tracks and the ocean-going freighters.
During the Cold War our suicidal nuclear policy was actually called "Mutually Assured Destruction." We discuss the US's nuclear weapons after the Cold War, including Trident and the others designed specifically for a "first strike," to actually begin a nuclear war.
Tom Rogers tells his own personal experience commanding a nuclear submarine and how he changed his mind. Leonard Eiger shares his own reasons for working for nuclear disarmament.
Our two guests have been working hard to abolish nuclear weapons, especially the Trident system, through the Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, which is located immediately next to the Trident base.
- published: 23 Oct 2013
- views: 193
Corsham Computer Centre UNWANTED VISIT
We decided to take a trip down to the super secret Corsham Computer Centre which is an underground complex which is apparently a Nuclear Command and Control cen...
We decided to take a trip down to the super secret Corsham Computer Centre which is an underground complex which is apparently a Nuclear Command and Control centre for the British Military. Very easy to access from the main road the facility has opted for a "low key" approach not advertising its presence with any Keep Out signs or warnings that you shouldn't be there. This means that you can get extremely close to the entrance before being asked to leave by the MOD police who will arrive in a minute.
If you decide to go there, take a camera as there are no anti-photography signs and know your rights but be polite with the police who will want to take your details. Dont mention my name unless you want to get some giggles.
Youtube user Mark Quested wrote this.
The computer centre tests and maintains software used for the Trident nuclear deterrent, such as the targeting software, according to official parliamentary documents. (However, in wartime, it MAY have a dual-purpose role as a subsidary site to the Northwood nuclear weapons command centre, but that's guess work on my part.)
According to a former MOD Corsham employee, it was housed underground simply because there was space available for it in the old underground Bath Stone Hudswell Quarry.
wn.com/Corsham Computer Centre Unwanted Visit
We decided to take a trip down to the super secret Corsham Computer Centre which is an underground complex which is apparently a Nuclear Command and Control centre for the British Military. Very easy to access from the main road the facility has opted for a "low key" approach not advertising its presence with any Keep Out signs or warnings that you shouldn't be there. This means that you can get extremely close to the entrance before being asked to leave by the MOD police who will arrive in a minute.
If you decide to go there, take a camera as there are no anti-photography signs and know your rights but be polite with the police who will want to take your details. Dont mention my name unless you want to get some giggles.
Youtube user Mark Quested wrote this.
The computer centre tests and maintains software used for the Trident nuclear deterrent, such as the targeting software, according to official parliamentary documents. (However, in wartime, it MAY have a dual-purpose role as a subsidary site to the Northwood nuclear weapons command centre, but that's guess work on my part.)
According to a former MOD Corsham employee, it was housed underground simply because there was space available for it in the old underground Bath Stone Hudswell Quarry.
- published: 23 Jul 2013
- views: 6021
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011.
Michael Quinlan's caree...
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011.
Michael Quinlan's career in the British civil service spanned three decades, during which time he advised various governments, including those of James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher. He was closely involved in the decision to procure Trident from the United States and, within NATO, in shaping the policies that led to the deployment of cruise and Pershing missiles. His grasp of defence policy, in particular regarding nuclear deterrence, was second to none. The book was introduced by Mark Fitzpatrick, Director, IISS Nonproliferation and Disarmament research programme and Sir Richard Mottram, former Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Defence.
wn.com/Adelphi Book Launch On Nuclear Deterrence The Correspondence Of Sir Michael Quinlan
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011.
Michael Quinlan's career in the British civil service spanned three decades, during which time he advised various governments, including those of James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher. He was closely involved in the decision to procure Trident from the United States and, within NATO, in shaping the policies that led to the deployment of cruise and Pershing missiles. His grasp of defence policy, in particular regarding nuclear deterrence, was second to none. The book was introduced by Mark Fitzpatrick, Director, IISS Nonproliferation and Disarmament research programme and Sir Richard Mottram, former Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Defence.
- published: 26 Oct 2011
- views: 350
Poseidon Seminar 2012
The Poseidon Seminars are an annual event, where all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the glo...
The Poseidon Seminars are an annual event, where all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a nuclear weapons-free world, can come together in serious intellectual discussion and debate. The huge costs of refitting Trident and the question of who will pay for it, and whether this money could be more usefully spent, are among the many topics to debate in earnest. We anticipate that eventually, these seminars will include MOD officials, political representatives, peace campaigners and diplomats. IIPSGP has already run over 30 meetings in the UK House of Lords which have touched on these concerns. Now is the time to have a serious debate which can encompass all opinions on the matter and see if any intelligent consensus can begin to emerge, ranging from the CND position of total nuclear disarmament, to the Conservative government's policy of refitting out a whole new generation of nuclear submarines to replace the aging Trident fleet. The purpose of the Poseidon Seminars is to hold a high level discussion on the pros and cons of each possible approach and see if real clarity and agreement can be reached.
The event is hosted by the Centre for Peace Policy Research, a new think tank based now at the Castle of the Muses, which is the first research organisation in the world to focus on peace policy rather than military or strategic or intelligence policy. In a world where the simplicity of superpower confrontations, and polarised cold war politics, have been replaced by more sophisticated multicultural and multi-religious tensions and conflicts, what kind of peace policy might be useful or advantageous in relation to the future of nuclear weapons ? What kind of tools or "weapons" do we need to re-build peace and trust between nations and cultures and religions, in the contemporary world ? These are some of the questions we shall be asking. The Convenor of the Seminar is Dr Thomas Clough Daffern a philosopher and educator with a PhD in Transpersonal History from the University of London, who has taught at the Universities of London and Oxford. He is Director of the International Institute of Peace Studies and Global Philosophy, now based at the Castle of the Muses.
Venue Information
The Castle of the Muses, home to the International Institute of Peace Studies and Global Philosophy (IIPSGP), is situated on Loch Goil, which is one of the deep sea lochs near to where the British Independent Nuclear deterrent is based. The submarines can be glimpsed in the Loch from time to time.
CENTRE FOR PEACE POLICY RESEARCH (CEPPR)
www.educationaid.net
wn.com/Poseidon Seminar 2012
The Poseidon Seminars are an annual event, where all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a nuclear weapons-free world, can come together in serious intellectual discussion and debate. The huge costs of refitting Trident and the question of who will pay for it, and whether this money could be more usefully spent, are among the many topics to debate in earnest. We anticipate that eventually, these seminars will include MOD officials, political representatives, peace campaigners and diplomats. IIPSGP has already run over 30 meetings in the UK House of Lords which have touched on these concerns. Now is the time to have a serious debate which can encompass all opinions on the matter and see if any intelligent consensus can begin to emerge, ranging from the CND position of total nuclear disarmament, to the Conservative government's policy of refitting out a whole new generation of nuclear submarines to replace the aging Trident fleet. The purpose of the Poseidon Seminars is to hold a high level discussion on the pros and cons of each possible approach and see if real clarity and agreement can be reached.
The event is hosted by the Centre for Peace Policy Research, a new think tank based now at the Castle of the Muses, which is the first research organisation in the world to focus on peace policy rather than military or strategic or intelligence policy. In a world where the simplicity of superpower confrontations, and polarised cold war politics, have been replaced by more sophisticated multicultural and multi-religious tensions and conflicts, what kind of peace policy might be useful or advantageous in relation to the future of nuclear weapons ? What kind of tools or "weapons" do we need to re-build peace and trust between nations and cultures and religions, in the contemporary world ? These are some of the questions we shall be asking. The Convenor of the Seminar is Dr Thomas Clough Daffern a philosopher and educator with a PhD in Transpersonal History from the University of London, who has taught at the Universities of London and Oxford. He is Director of the International Institute of Peace Studies and Global Philosophy, now based at the Castle of the Muses.
Venue Information
The Castle of the Muses, home to the International Institute of Peace Studies and Global Philosophy (IIPSGP), is situated on Loch Goil, which is one of the deep sea lochs near to where the British Independent Nuclear deterrent is based. The submarines can be glimpsed in the Loch from time to time.
CENTRE FOR PEACE POLICY RESEARCH (CEPPR)
www.educationaid.net
- published: 03 Dec 2012
- views: 147
Successor to the UK Trident system
The Successor programme is a British programme to replace the Vanguard-class of ballistic missile submarines, which began to enter service in 1992 with a 25 yea...
The Successor programme is a British programme to replace the Vanguard-class of ballistic missile submarines, which began to enter service in 1992 with a 25 year intended service life. These submarines currently carry the Trident D5 ballistic missiles, which are now the sole delivery vehicle for the UK's nuclear weapons. The submarine is currently referred to as Successor. Replacement of the Vanguard-class submarines as they reach the end of their service life is necessary if the UK is to retain a continuous at-sea deterrent. The programme has generated political controversy as some oppose the retention of CASD or of any nuclear weapons by the United Kingdom on moral, legal, or financial grounds.
The term "Trident" is popularly used to refer to Britain's entire current system of nuclear weapons, including the Vanguard-class submarines, Trident missiles, and warheads, without distinction, and "replacement of Trident" to refer to the Successor programme. However, the Successor programme does not concern the replacement of the Trident missiles themselves, which are designed, manufactured, and maintained in the United States. No project for the replacement of the Trident missile currently exists in either country.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Successor To The UK Trident System
The Successor programme is a British programme to replace the Vanguard-class of ballistic missile submarines, which began to enter service in 1992 with a 25 year intended service life. These submarines currently carry the Trident D5 ballistic missiles, which are now the sole delivery vehicle for the UK's nuclear weapons. The submarine is currently referred to as Successor. Replacement of the Vanguard-class submarines as they reach the end of their service life is necessary if the UK is to retain a continuous at-sea deterrent. The programme has generated political controversy as some oppose the retention of CASD or of any nuclear weapons by the United Kingdom on moral, legal, or financial grounds.
The term "Trident" is popularly used to refer to Britain's entire current system of nuclear weapons, including the Vanguard-class submarines, Trident missiles, and warheads, without distinction, and "replacement of Trident" to refer to the Successor programme. However, the Successor programme does not concern the replacement of the Trident missiles themselves, which are designed, manufactured, and maintained in the United States. No project for the replacement of the Trident missile currently exists in either country.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 31 Oct 2015
- views: 36
Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines: "Our Crucial Deterrent" 1973 US Navy
more at http://quickfound.net/links/military_news_and_links.html
On the upgrading of Polaris SSBN nuclear submarines to carry the Poseidon missile. Includes hi...
more at http://quickfound.net/links/military_news_and_links.html
On the upgrading of Polaris SSBN nuclear submarines to carry the Poseidon missile. Includes history of the Polaris SSBNs, development of the solid rocket motor and launch hardware, prior attempts to place missiles on subs (Regulus missiles), and Admiral Raborn at the first successful undersea launch of a missile from a submarine. Subs that appear in the film include the USS George Washington (SSBN-598), USS Tunny (SS-282), USS James Madison (SSN-627), the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), the USS John Calhoun (SSBN-630), USS Daniel Boone (SSBN-629) and the USS Kamehameha (SSBN-642).
Public domain film from the US Navy, slightly cropped to remove uneven edges, with the aspect ratio corrected, and mild video noise reduction applied.
The soundtrack was also processed with volume normalization, noise reduction, clipping reduction, and/or equalization (the resulting sound, though not perfect, is far less noisy than the original).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGM-73_Poseidon
The UGM-73 Poseidon missile was the second US Navy ballistic missile system, powered by a two-stage solid fuel rocket. It succeeded the Polaris missile beginning in 1972, bringing major advances in warheads and accuracy. It was followed by Trident I in 1979, and Trident II in 1990...
Development
A development study for a longer range version of the Polaris missile achieved by enlarging it to the maximum possible size allowed by existing launch tubes started in 1963. Tests had already shown that Polaris missiles could be operated without problems in launch tubes that had their fiberglass liners and locating rings removed.
The project was given the title Polaris B3 in November, but the missile was eventually named Poseidon C3 to emphasize the technical advances over its predecessor. The C3 was the only version of the missile produced, and it was also given the designation UGM-73A.
Slightly longer and considerably wider and heavier than Polaris A3, Poseidon had the same 4,600 kilometres (2,500 nmi) range, greater payload capacity, improved accuracy, and MIRV capability. Poseidon could deliver up to fourteen W68 thermonuclear warheads contained in Mark 3 reentry vehicles to multiple targets. The high-re-entry-speed design was intended to counter Sprint-type terminal ABM defenses. See Atmospheric re-entry for blunt body theory.
The low-yield warheads were apparently selected to make the weapon unsuitable as a first-strike weapon against hardened targets in the Soviet Union, but could be used in a retaliatory strike against soft targets, or in a preemptive strike against unhardened surface targets such as airfields, SAM sites, radar sites and other similar targets, opening a pathway for heavy bombers. In later years this targeting technique has been demonstrated by the use of cruise missiles to neutralize airfields, SAM sites etc. in the opening phases of the Gulf War.
As with Polaris, starting a rocket motor when the missile was still in the submarine was considered very dangerous. Therefore, the missile was ejected from its launch tube using high pressure steam produced by a solid-fueled boiler. The main rocket motor ignited automatically when the missile had risen approximately 10 metres (33 ft) above the submarine.
The first test launch took place on 16 August 1968, the first successful at-sea launch was from a surface ship, the historic USNS Observation Island (from July 1 to December 16, 1969), earning the ship the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the first test launch from a submarine took place on the USS James Madison on 3 August 1970. The weapon officially entered service on 31 March 1971. It eventually equipped 31 Lafayette-, James Madison-, and Benjamin Franklin-class submarines.
Beginning in 1979, 12 Poseidon-equipped SSBNs were refitted with Trident I. By 1992, the Soviet Union had collapsed, 12 Ohio-class submarines had been commissioned, and the START I treaty had gone into effect, so the 31 older Poseidon- and Trident I-armed SSBNs were disarmed, withdrawing Poseidon from service.
About 620 UGM-73A missiles were built between 1970 and 1978...
wn.com/Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines Our Crucial Deterrent 1973 US Navy
more at http://quickfound.net/links/military_news_and_links.html
On the upgrading of Polaris SSBN nuclear submarines to carry the Poseidon missile. Includes history of the Polaris SSBNs, development of the solid rocket motor and launch hardware, prior attempts to place missiles on subs (Regulus missiles), and Admiral Raborn at the first successful undersea launch of a missile from a submarine. Subs that appear in the film include the USS George Washington (SSBN-598), USS Tunny (SS-282), USS James Madison (SSN-627), the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), the USS John Calhoun (SSBN-630), USS Daniel Boone (SSBN-629) and the USS Kamehameha (SSBN-642).
Public domain film from the US Navy, slightly cropped to remove uneven edges, with the aspect ratio corrected, and mild video noise reduction applied.
The soundtrack was also processed with volume normalization, noise reduction, clipping reduction, and/or equalization (the resulting sound, though not perfect, is far less noisy than the original).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGM-73_Poseidon
The UGM-73 Poseidon missile was the second US Navy ballistic missile system, powered by a two-stage solid fuel rocket. It succeeded the Polaris missile beginning in 1972, bringing major advances in warheads and accuracy. It was followed by Trident I in 1979, and Trident II in 1990...
Development
A development study for a longer range version of the Polaris missile achieved by enlarging it to the maximum possible size allowed by existing launch tubes started in 1963. Tests had already shown that Polaris missiles could be operated without problems in launch tubes that had their fiberglass liners and locating rings removed.
The project was given the title Polaris B3 in November, but the missile was eventually named Poseidon C3 to emphasize the technical advances over its predecessor. The C3 was the only version of the missile produced, and it was also given the designation UGM-73A.
Slightly longer and considerably wider and heavier than Polaris A3, Poseidon had the same 4,600 kilometres (2,500 nmi) range, greater payload capacity, improved accuracy, and MIRV capability. Poseidon could deliver up to fourteen W68 thermonuclear warheads contained in Mark 3 reentry vehicles to multiple targets. The high-re-entry-speed design was intended to counter Sprint-type terminal ABM defenses. See Atmospheric re-entry for blunt body theory.
The low-yield warheads were apparently selected to make the weapon unsuitable as a first-strike weapon against hardened targets in the Soviet Union, but could be used in a retaliatory strike against soft targets, or in a preemptive strike against unhardened surface targets such as airfields, SAM sites, radar sites and other similar targets, opening a pathway for heavy bombers. In later years this targeting technique has been demonstrated by the use of cruise missiles to neutralize airfields, SAM sites etc. in the opening phases of the Gulf War.
As with Polaris, starting a rocket motor when the missile was still in the submarine was considered very dangerous. Therefore, the missile was ejected from its launch tube using high pressure steam produced by a solid-fueled boiler. The main rocket motor ignited automatically when the missile had risen approximately 10 metres (33 ft) above the submarine.
The first test launch took place on 16 August 1968, the first successful at-sea launch was from a surface ship, the historic USNS Observation Island (from July 1 to December 16, 1969), earning the ship the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the first test launch from a submarine took place on the USS James Madison on 3 August 1970. The weapon officially entered service on 31 March 1971. It eventually equipped 31 Lafayette-, James Madison-, and Benjamin Franklin-class submarines.
Beginning in 1979, 12 Poseidon-equipped SSBNs were refitted with Trident I. By 1992, the Soviet Union had collapsed, 12 Ohio-class submarines had been commissioned, and the START I treaty had gone into effect, so the 31 older Poseidon- and Trident I-armed SSBNs were disarmed, withdrawing Poseidon from service.
About 620 UGM-73A missiles were built between 1970 and 1978...
- published: 14 Dec 2014
- views: 1902
Poseidon Seminar 2011 Part 2 - Janet Fenton
The Poseidon Seminars are for all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a...
The Poseidon Seminars are for all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a nuclear weapons-free world. The huge costs of refitting Trident and the question of who will pay for it, and whether this money could be more usefully spent, are among the many topics debated.
The event is hosted by the Centre for Peace Policy Studies, a new think tank based in Argyll, Scotland which is the first research organisation in the world to focus on peace policy rather than military or strategic or intelligence policy. In a world where the simplicity of superpower confrontations, and polarised cold war politics, have been replaced by more sophisticated multicultural and multi-religious tensions and conflicts, what kind of peace policy might be useful or advantageous in relation to the future of nuclear weapons ? What kind of tools or "weapons" do we need to re-build peace and trust between nations and cultures and religions, in the contemporary world ? These are some of the questions we shall be asking.
This video features Janet Fenton who is a member of Trident Ploughshares, past coordinator of the Edinburgh Peace and Justice Centre, secretary of Scottish CND and secretary of the Scottish branch of Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (S WILPF).
For further information on the work of the Centre for Peace Policy Research visit http://ceppr.wordpress.com/policy-proposal/
wn.com/Poseidon Seminar 2011 Part 2 Janet Fenton
The Poseidon Seminars are for all those interested in debating and discussing the future of both Britain's own nuclear deterrent, and the global prospects for a nuclear weapons-free world. The huge costs of refitting Trident and the question of who will pay for it, and whether this money could be more usefully spent, are among the many topics debated.
The event is hosted by the Centre for Peace Policy Studies, a new think tank based in Argyll, Scotland which is the first research organisation in the world to focus on peace policy rather than military or strategic or intelligence policy. In a world where the simplicity of superpower confrontations, and polarised cold war politics, have been replaced by more sophisticated multicultural and multi-religious tensions and conflicts, what kind of peace policy might be useful or advantageous in relation to the future of nuclear weapons ? What kind of tools or "weapons" do we need to re-build peace and trust between nations and cultures and religions, in the contemporary world ? These are some of the questions we shall be asking.
This video features Janet Fenton who is a member of Trident Ploughshares, past coordinator of the Edinburgh Peace and Justice Centre, secretary of Scottish CND and secretary of the Scottish branch of Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (S WILPF).
For further information on the work of the Centre for Peace Policy Research visit http://ceppr.wordpress.com/policy-proposal/
- published: 10 Jul 2014
- views: 19
Nuke Syndrome (A Modern-Day Disaster: Nuclear Weapons as the Currency of Global Power)
“Israel, probably more than any other state in the world has had more resolutions past against it and has broken those resolutions and yet it seems to be able t...
“Israel, probably more than any other state in the world has had more resolutions past against it and has broken those resolutions and yet it seems to be able to exist without any sanctions because it is protected by the United States,” this thought-provoking statement made by Paul Ingram puts the contradictory scenario of nowadays world about nuclear bombs into perspective. Paul Ingram is the executive director of the British American Security Information Council and is involved in developing a long-term strategy to help reduce global nuclear dangers through disarmament and collaborative non-proliferation, coordinating operations in London and Washington. For over sixty years, the United Nations has been unable to establish sustainable security in the world. Although the majority of nations pursue a world free of nuclear weapons the more dominant armed states are reluctant to give up their weapons of mass destruction creating a geopolitical fear to other states who choose to keep the bombs as a deterrent.
Through informative, revealing interviews, “Nuke Syndrome” provides food for thought about the status quo of testing and producing nuclear bombs across the globe. We are informed about this sad fact that though horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain a permanent scar on the world, the horrors didn’t stop there since numerous countries have tested nuclear bomb explosions seeking ways to strengthen their destructive force. The U.S. allocated one hundred and eighty five billion dollars to augment its nuclear stockpile over the next decade. Meanwhile, British politicians have plans on spending seventy six billion pounds to renew their navy’s trident missiles. The irony is that while Iran is calling for global nuclear disarmament and the right to peaceful nuclear energy, and while there is no real evidence that Iran is making nuclear weapons, this peace-seeking country is constantly being threatened by war and sanctions for the false accusation leveled against it that it is trying to produce nuclear weapons.
PRESS TV Documentaries
wn.com/Nuke Syndrome (A Modern Day Disaster Nuclear Weapons As The Currency Of Global Power)
“Israel, probably more than any other state in the world has had more resolutions past against it and has broken those resolutions and yet it seems to be able to exist without any sanctions because it is protected by the United States,” this thought-provoking statement made by Paul Ingram puts the contradictory scenario of nowadays world about nuclear bombs into perspective. Paul Ingram is the executive director of the British American Security Information Council and is involved in developing a long-term strategy to help reduce global nuclear dangers through disarmament and collaborative non-proliferation, coordinating operations in London and Washington. For over sixty years, the United Nations has been unable to establish sustainable security in the world. Although the majority of nations pursue a world free of nuclear weapons the more dominant armed states are reluctant to give up their weapons of mass destruction creating a geopolitical fear to other states who choose to keep the bombs as a deterrent.
Through informative, revealing interviews, “Nuke Syndrome” provides food for thought about the status quo of testing and producing nuclear bombs across the globe. We are informed about this sad fact that though horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain a permanent scar on the world, the horrors didn’t stop there since numerous countries have tested nuclear bomb explosions seeking ways to strengthen their destructive force. The U.S. allocated one hundred and eighty five billion dollars to augment its nuclear stockpile over the next decade. Meanwhile, British politicians have plans on spending seventy six billion pounds to renew their navy’s trident missiles. The irony is that while Iran is calling for global nuclear disarmament and the right to peaceful nuclear energy, and while there is no real evidence that Iran is making nuclear weapons, this peace-seeking country is constantly being threatened by war and sanctions for the false accusation leveled against it that it is trying to produce nuclear weapons.
PRESS TV Documentaries
- published: 11 Jan 2015
- views: 1063
Imperial Partnership: UK to build more nuclear weapons: 'the ultimate insurance policy'!?
07.04.2013 Nuke is not a deterrent, contrary... it is most deadly weapon, to war against entire humanity. While people are taxed for bedrooms... Queen get rise ...
07.04.2013 Nuke is not a deterrent, contrary... it is most deadly weapon, to war against entire humanity. While people are taxed for bedrooms... Queen get rise of salary... Cameron build more weapons of mass destruction, using Korea for pretest to arm, for colonial take over, by nuke enforced ...NWO imperial aims must be halted Decommission all Nuke weapon Worldwide...End Nuclear Era. It is possible. Namaste
Mirrored: http://www.youtube.com/user/PressTVGl... An American activist says the United States and Britain are partners in imperialism that are responsible for the killing of millions of people in Iraq and Afghanistan. UK Prime Minister David Cameron has defended the UK's need to develop nuclear weapons based on what he claims as "the ultimate insurance policy" to ward off a nuclear threat coming from North Korea. Cameron's warning comes as the UK Liberal Democrats and parts of the Labour Party are opposed to the £20-billion project to replace the Trident nuclear weapons system.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Richard Becker, with the ANSWER Coalition, San Francisco. Becker is joined by Bob Ayers, a former US intelligence officer from Somerset.
Original upload: http://youtu.be/tqQ4hurq7gQ
THANK YOU FOR WATCHING....Namaste
Nonprofit activism
FAIR USE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in a effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc..I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. No copyright infringement is ever intended..
wn.com/Imperial Partnership UK To Build More Nuclear Weapons 'The Ultimate Insurance Policy'
07.04.2013 Nuke is not a deterrent, contrary... it is most deadly weapon, to war against entire humanity. While people are taxed for bedrooms... Queen get rise of salary... Cameron build more weapons of mass destruction, using Korea for pretest to arm, for colonial take over, by nuke enforced ...NWO imperial aims must be halted Decommission all Nuke weapon Worldwide...End Nuclear Era. It is possible. Namaste
Mirrored: http://www.youtube.com/user/PressTVGl... An American activist says the United States and Britain are partners in imperialism that are responsible for the killing of millions of people in Iraq and Afghanistan. UK Prime Minister David Cameron has defended the UK's need to develop nuclear weapons based on what he claims as "the ultimate insurance policy" to ward off a nuclear threat coming from North Korea. Cameron's warning comes as the UK Liberal Democrats and parts of the Labour Party are opposed to the £20-billion project to replace the Trident nuclear weapons system.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Richard Becker, with the ANSWER Coalition, San Francisco. Becker is joined by Bob Ayers, a former US intelligence officer from Somerset.
Original upload: http://youtu.be/tqQ4hurq7gQ
THANK YOU FOR WATCHING....Namaste
Nonprofit activism
FAIR USE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in a effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc..I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. No copyright infringement is ever intended..
- published: 07 Apr 2013
- views: 267
US Navy NUCLEAR ARMED submarine documentry
An interesting documentary on US navy nuclear armed submarines produced by the pentagon channel. Composition of the current force[edit]
Ohio class (18 in commis...
An interesting documentary on US navy nuclear armed submarines produced by the pentagon channel. Composition of the current force[edit]
Ohio class (18 in commission) — 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), 4 guided missile submarines (SSGNs)
Virginia class (11 in commission, 5 under construction, 2 on order) — fast attack submarines
Seawolf class (3 in commission) — attack submarines
Los Angeles class (43 in commission, 2 in reserve) — attack submarines
Fast attack submarines
The U.S. has 43 Los Angeles-class submarines on active duty and 19 retired, making it the most numerous nuclear-powered submarine class in the world. The class was preceded by the Sturgeon class and followed by the Seawolf and Virginia classes. Except for USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN-709), submarines of this class are named after U.S. cities, breaking a Navy tradition of naming attack submarines after sea creatures.
The final 23 boats in the series, referred to as "688i" boats, are quieter than their predecessors and incorporate a more advanced combat system.[18] These 688i boats are also designed for under-ice operations: their diving planes are on the bow rather than on the sail, and they have reinforced sails.
Ballistic and guided missile submarines
The U.S. has 18 Ohio-class submarines, of which 14 are Trident II SSBNs (Ship, Submersible, Ballistic, Nuclear), each capable of carrying 24 SLBMs. The first four which were all equipped with the older Trident I missiles have been converted to SSGN's each capable of carrying 154 Tomahawk guided missiles and have been further equipped to support Special Operations (SEALS). If the maximum of 154 Tomahawk missiles were loaded, one Ohio-class SSGN would carry an entire Battle Group's equivalent of cruise missiles. Ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs or boomers in American slang) carry submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) with nuclear warheads for attacking strategic targets such as cities or missile silos anywhere in the world. They are currently universally nuclear-powered to provide the greatest stealth and endurance. They played an important part in Cold War mutual deterrence, as both the United States and the Soviet Union had the credible ability to conduct a retaliatory strike against the other nation in the event of a first strike. This comprised an important part of the strategy of Mutual Assured Destruction.
In order to comply with arms reduction against the START II treaty, the U.S. Navy modified the four oldest Ohio-class Trident submarines (Ohio (SSGN-726), Michigan (SSGN-727), Florida (SSGN-728), and Georgia (SSGN-729)) to SSGN (Ship, Submersible, Guided, Nuclear) configuration. The conversion was achieved by installing vertical launching systems (VLS) in a configuration dubbed "multiple all-up-round canister (MAC)." This system was installed in 22 of the 24 missile tubes, replacing one large nuclear strategic ballistic missile with 7 smaller Tomahawk cruise missiles. The 2 remaining tubes were converted to lockout chambers (LOC) to be used by special forces personnel who can be carried on board. This gives each converted sub the capability to carry up to 154 Tomahawk missiles. The MAC tubes can also be used to carry and launch UAVs or UUVs which give the ship remote controlled "eyes & ears" allowing the ship to act as a forward-deployed command & control center. Despite the increase in stand-off strike capabilities, this conversion counts as an [19][20] because it reduces the number of nuclear weapons that are forward-deployed.[clarification needed]
The American George Washington-class "boomers" were named for patriots, and together with the Ethan Allen, Lafayette, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin classes, these SSBNs comprised the Cold War-era "41 for Freedom." Later Ohio-class submarines were named for states (recognizing the increase in striking power and importance once bestowed upon battleships), with the exception of Henry M. Jackson (SSBN-730), which was named for United States Senator Henry M. "Scoop" Jackson (1912–1983) of Washington upon his death while in office (1983). This honor was in recognition of his advocacy on behalf of the nuclear submarine program. He strongly supported the rapid development of nuclear submarines and especially the development of an SSBN program. Senator Jackson also called for the establishment of a Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Undersea Warfare because he believed submarines were "lost in a welter of naval bureaucracy."
Personnel[edit]
U.S. Navy submarines are manned solely by volunteers from within the Navy.[21] Because of the stressful environment aboard submarines, personnel are accepted only after rigorous testing and observation, as a consequence submariners have significantly lower mental hospitalization rates than surface ship personnel.[22] Furthermore, submariners receive submarine duty incentive pay (SUBPAY) in addition to sea pay.[23]
wn.com/US Navy Nuclear Armed Submarine Documentry
An interesting documentary on US navy nuclear armed submarines produced by the pentagon channel. Composition of the current force[edit]
Ohio class (18 in commission) — 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), 4 guided missile submarines (SSGNs)
Virginia class (11 in commission, 5 under construction, 2 on order) — fast attack submarines
Seawolf class (3 in commission) — attack submarines
Los Angeles class (43 in commission, 2 in reserve) — attack submarines
Fast attack submarines
The U.S. has 43 Los Angeles-class submarines on active duty and 19 retired, making it the most numerous nuclear-powered submarine class in the world. The class was preceded by the Sturgeon class and followed by the Seawolf and Virginia classes. Except for USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN-709), submarines of this class are named after U.S. cities, breaking a Navy tradition of naming attack submarines after sea creatures.
The final 23 boats in the series, referred to as "688i" boats, are quieter than their predecessors and incorporate a more advanced combat system.[18] These 688i boats are also designed for under-ice operations: their diving planes are on the bow rather than on the sail, and they have reinforced sails.
Ballistic and guided missile submarines
The U.S. has 18 Ohio-class submarines, of which 14 are Trident II SSBNs (Ship, Submersible, Ballistic, Nuclear), each capable of carrying 24 SLBMs. The first four which were all equipped with the older Trident I missiles have been converted to SSGN's each capable of carrying 154 Tomahawk guided missiles and have been further equipped to support Special Operations (SEALS). If the maximum of 154 Tomahawk missiles were loaded, one Ohio-class SSGN would carry an entire Battle Group's equivalent of cruise missiles. Ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs or boomers in American slang) carry submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) with nuclear warheads for attacking strategic targets such as cities or missile silos anywhere in the world. They are currently universally nuclear-powered to provide the greatest stealth and endurance. They played an important part in Cold War mutual deterrence, as both the United States and the Soviet Union had the credible ability to conduct a retaliatory strike against the other nation in the event of a first strike. This comprised an important part of the strategy of Mutual Assured Destruction.
In order to comply with arms reduction against the START II treaty, the U.S. Navy modified the four oldest Ohio-class Trident submarines (Ohio (SSGN-726), Michigan (SSGN-727), Florida (SSGN-728), and Georgia (SSGN-729)) to SSGN (Ship, Submersible, Guided, Nuclear) configuration. The conversion was achieved by installing vertical launching systems (VLS) in a configuration dubbed "multiple all-up-round canister (MAC)." This system was installed in 22 of the 24 missile tubes, replacing one large nuclear strategic ballistic missile with 7 smaller Tomahawk cruise missiles. The 2 remaining tubes were converted to lockout chambers (LOC) to be used by special forces personnel who can be carried on board. This gives each converted sub the capability to carry up to 154 Tomahawk missiles. The MAC tubes can also be used to carry and launch UAVs or UUVs which give the ship remote controlled "eyes & ears" allowing the ship to act as a forward-deployed command & control center. Despite the increase in stand-off strike capabilities, this conversion counts as an [19][20] because it reduces the number of nuclear weapons that are forward-deployed.[clarification needed]
The American George Washington-class "boomers" were named for patriots, and together with the Ethan Allen, Lafayette, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin classes, these SSBNs comprised the Cold War-era "41 for Freedom." Later Ohio-class submarines were named for states (recognizing the increase in striking power and importance once bestowed upon battleships), with the exception of Henry M. Jackson (SSBN-730), which was named for United States Senator Henry M. "Scoop" Jackson (1912–1983) of Washington upon his death while in office (1983). This honor was in recognition of his advocacy on behalf of the nuclear submarine program. He strongly supported the rapid development of nuclear submarines and especially the development of an SSBN program. Senator Jackson also called for the establishment of a Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Undersea Warfare because he believed submarines were "lost in a welter of naval bureaucracy."
Personnel[edit]
U.S. Navy submarines are manned solely by volunteers from within the Navy.[21] Because of the stressful environment aboard submarines, personnel are accepted only after rigorous testing and observation, as a consequence submariners have significantly lower mental hospitalization rates than surface ship personnel.[22] Furthermore, submariners receive submarine duty incentive pay (SUBPAY) in addition to sea pay.[23]
- published: 27 Oct 2014
- views: 63697