RSS
Medium Stands Up To Malaysia's Attempt To Take Down Investigative Reporting; Gets Entire Site Blocked In Malaysia
from the censorship-again dept
We've seen an increasing effort by governments around the globe to censor content they don't like. This takes many different forms, but one fairly typical one is for governments to send official looking documents to websites and webhosts demanding that certain content be taken down. Many smaller companies, often with no official policy in place on how to handle such requests, will cave and just take the content down to avoid the hassle. However, recently we've seen a growing number of sites reject such requests, unless they're accompanied by a valid court order. The latest is Medium, the increasingly popular content publishing platform.
In this case, the issue involves the government of Malaysia and the investigative journalism site Sarawak Report, which has been writing a bunch of stories, many based on apparently leaked documents, exposing corruption in Malaysia. Last summer, the website was blocked in Malaysia after a series of reports related to claims of $700 million magically appearing in the Malaysian Prime Minister's personal bank account. After having its own website blocked, Sarawak also started republishing all its articles on Medium.
That was last October. Apparently last week, Medium received an email from the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) demanding that one of the Sarawak stories be removed:
Of course, as you hopefully already know, one of the clearest signs of censorious thuggery is to claim that an article is "false" or defamatory in some way without ever getting into the specifics of what is false. Medium, quite rightly, responded to the MCMC by asking for more detailed evidence, showing (1) what specific statements are untrue and (2) any official judicial findings about the story.
The company received no response -- but late last week discovered that all of Medium is now blocked in Malaysia. If that's meant to intimidate the company into taking down the article, it's not working:
In this case, the issue involves the government of Malaysia and the investigative journalism site Sarawak Report, which has been writing a bunch of stories, many based on apparently leaked documents, exposing corruption in Malaysia. Last summer, the website was blocked in Malaysia after a series of reports related to claims of $700 million magically appearing in the Malaysian Prime Minister's personal bank account. After having its own website blocked, Sarawak also started republishing all its articles on Medium.
We remain blocked in #Malaysia over our #1MDB investigations but Malaysians can access our latest story here - https://t.co/2jk9ZNyyKs
— Sarawak Report (@sarawak_report) October 29, 2015Medium’s in no position to evaluate the truth of the Sarawak Report’s Medium post. We’ve received no evidence that the post violates any of our Rules, or any law. We stand by investigative journalists who publish on Medium. Until we receive an order from a court of competent jurisdiction, the post stays up.Kudos to Medium for taking such a stand.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
VPN
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hmmm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Then why fret? Keep on publishing!
But remember,it is also the Malaysian government's ( de facto ) right if it wishes to keep on blocking your site in Malaysia.
You have your rights, as does the Malaysian government, no?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No. How is the world made a better place by acknowledging governments have rights? They don't need them, for one thing. If they really dislike something, there's lots of things they can do about it.
Imagine a gov't losing an election or confidence vote then taking that as a personal attack. That doesn't get anyone but tyrants anywhere. They should be forced to defend themselves. They don't need rights.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment