JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

The time is now: An Australian republic is too important to wait

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Australian leaders renew push for republic

State and territory leaders except WA's Colin Barnett have signed a declaration calling to replace the monarchy with an Australian head of state. Courtesy ABC News 24.

PT2M45S 620 349

 In my address to the National Press Club in August of last year I stated that, "Never before have the stars of the Southern Cross been so aligned as now, pointing to the dawn of the Australian republic."

The fact that Malcolm Turnbull became Prime Minister shortly afterwards only lined those stars up even better, and that alignment has continued at astonishing pace since. This Australia Day, the Australian Republican Movement has quadruple the number of members as last year. Donations, which used to sound, for very good reason, like a 20 cent piece landing in an otherwise empty 44 gallon drum, are now pouring in as never before. Business leaders like Alan Joyce, Ken Henry and Tony Shepherd have been as proud to stand with us, as we are to have them by our side, begging only they don't step on the toes of Julia Gillard, Anna Bligh, Senator Nova Peris-Kneebone and Hugh Jackman.

And then, the true breakthrough: Monday's "Declaration of Desired Independence", as I call it, whereby seven out of eight of the premiers and chief ministers signed up in honour of Australia Day, affirming their desire that we get on with it. The upshot is that that dawn is now close. We can do this, and we can do it soon. As the Prime Minister – the most passionate republican in the land – surveys the chances of getting up a referendum "with a majority of people in a  majority of states", it is a hell of a start to have all the leaders of those states with him! (Particularly when, the only one who didn't sign, WA Premier Colin Barnett, is also a strong republican.)

Peter FitzSimons, Australian Republican Movement chairman, says the country should get on with becoming a republic sooner rather than later.

Peter FitzSimons, Australian Republican Movement chairman, says the country should get on with becoming a republic sooner rather than later. Photo: Andrew Meares

The euphoric response to the release of that declaration – expressed  on talkback, twitter, emails and on the street – was nothing less than thrilling and historic. It included myriad front pages around the country applauding the move. I am a Fairfax man from the hairs of my chinny-chin-chin to the marrow of my bones, but the positive front page of the Daily Telegraph, with a headline hailing the "United States of Australia," and a supportive editorial to boot, was of enormous significance – as is the fact this column is jointly published by Fairfax Media and News Corporation.

All of us are putting our differences behind us, and coming together for the sake of the belief that in the 21st century, Australia really can do better than find our heads of state from one family of unelected English aristocrats, living in a palace in London, however much we might admire the head of that family, in her majesty. People believe!

One key sticking point is timing, with many maintaining that while we want to be a republic, it is better we wait until the Queen passes away.

I write now, to express my passionate contrary view.

I say we Australians have two ways of doing this.

We can do it while her majesty is still young enough to travel to this country, at which point, instead of bowing, curtsying and scraping ... instead of that, as a nation we could rise as one, give her a standing ovation, and say "Thank you, your majesty, for the sterling service you have provided our nation." She can then hand us the keys, and we affirm that, like the other 33 Commonwealth nations that have become republics on her watch – while still remaining part of the Commonwealth – we can take it from here. We could do that like grownups, looking our British equals in the eyes, and affirming that we have grown sufficiently to do this our way.

Or we can do it the sneaky way. We can wait till her majesty passes away, at which point we sneak out the back of Westminister Abbey and greet on the stairs the incoming King Charles – who has been waiting 70 years for the role – with the humiliation of our public affirmation before the world that while we were happy with his mother for all that time, we can't cop him for five minutes.

Is that fair to him? Does that fine man deserve that? I think not.

So let's be fair, let's be fabulous, and let's get on with it. Let a thousand flowers bloom as so many people from across our brown and pleasant land come forward offering their help, and let us set ourselves to get this done by 2020. Join the Australian Republican Movement, tell your friends, write to your parliamentarians, and let's make this happen!

Let us have this government commit to asking the Australian people a very simple question: "Do you think Australia should have an Australian as our head of state?" There will be a thumping YES, and we are on our way.  

Twitter: @Peter_Fitz  

159 comments so far

  • Why do we need a head of state at all? Surely, the PM or the Clerk of Parliament can formally open Parliament and certify that the legislation has been passed so as it becomes law. A head of state is simply an expensive and unnecessary luxury.

    Commenter
    B. Seiche
    Date and time
    January 25, 2016, 9:08PM
    • Given the quality of recent prime ministers, I wouldn't trust them to certify a dog licence. Of course we need a Head of State and she/he must be Australian.

      Commenter
      Mike
      Date and time
      January 25, 2016, 9:27PM
    • Agree. Whilst I am not anti-Republic, what I cannot condone is the wasteful cost of yet another layer of govt and security. We have too many snouts at the trough as it is! Maybe a trade off of States for a single unified Republic and president. That could save billions, ready to fund Gonski, NDIS and Indigenous opportunity. Think about it, it is our choice after all!
      PS. Fitz, you look much better without the bandana, mate.

      Commenter
      PG Tips
      Date and time
      January 25, 2016, 9:38PM
    • The Head of State, whether the Queen, Governor-General or President, is an important part of the checks and balances in our system of government.
      Although their role is largely ceremonial, the presence of this position provides a stop to any government that decided to exceed their authority. For example, a Prime Minister that decided not to call an election when due, would find themself called to,account by he Head of State and if acting unlawful, they may dissolve parliament.

      Commenter
      Anthony
      Location
      Ryde
      Date and time
      January 25, 2016, 11:01PM
    • Exactly. Spend it on roads, schools hospitals, the poor instead of yet more useless grandstanding politicians and bureaucrats. We are already the most politically over-represented nation on the planet.

      Commenter
      Betty
      Location
      Casino
      Date and time
      January 26, 2016, 1:14AM
    • The republican cause is about to get a huge boost. How do I know? Tony Abbott is back!

      Commenter
      Onion republic
      Date and time
      January 26, 2016, 1:30AM
    • President Abbott, what a good idea, or maybe President Rudd, or the luvvies favourite President Gillard, or even best of all, how about President Latham.

      Smoke and mirrors democracy is the only way to describe it.

      Commenter
      SteveH.
      Date and time
      January 26, 2016, 7:25AM
    • I agree with you Fitzy, it is important. There is however, one other issue which is more important and requires even greater urgent attention. The catastrophic failure of this primitive Westminster voting system to produce quality leadership and management from either side of the duopoly.

      Just like this ridiculous Monarchy, it has long past it's use by date and both should be cast back to the dim dark ages where they were once relevant.

      Commenter
      kanga
      Date and time
      January 26, 2016, 8:07AM
    • @ PG Tips "...what I cannot condone is the wasteful cost of yet another layer of govt and security."

      No. It wouldn't be another layer. On the contrary, we would be getting rid of the foreign layer. We already have a budget for our governor-general. He is already our de facto head of state. We would continue with this budget when we become a republic. We would also continue with our Parliamentary style system of government - as we should. It's the best system of government but gushing over foreign royalty isn't what makes it a good system.

      However, I do agree with your final comment.

      Commenter
      Elizabeth
      Date and time
      January 26, 2016, 8:34AM
    • The reserve powers of the GG are an important safeguard built into the constitution, so that position is required. The most minimalistic change is to have the GG as head of state. At present the nomination for GG is recommended to HRH for acceptance and, whilst vacant, the most senior state governor acts. Seems the smallest change and so the most likely to be accpeted, would be to have the recommendation not sent to HRH but instead for approval by the majority of state parliaments. To prevent deadlock, if the recommendation is not approved by the majority, the most senior state governor is appointed.

      Commenter
      ifonly
      Date and time
      January 26, 2016, 8:35AM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Related Coverage

HuffPost Australia

Featured advertisers

Special offers

Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo