-
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In...
-
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
-
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
-
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
Kay Nord Hunt.
-
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears case
-
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
-
High Court can't rule on conversion cases, Appellate Court finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
-
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
-
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significan
-
Appellate court ruling
What can I say
-
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
-
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
-
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/wh
-
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the ...
-
Abrams Verdict: Siegelman Released From Jail
Dan Abrams talks to Artur Davis and Scott Horton about the release of Don Siegelman from prison tonight, and recaps some of his coverage on the story. Now wi...
-
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhe...
-
Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voi
-
Appellate Court Upholds Suspension Of 8 Security Law Clauses
Attorney General Githu Muigai has lost an application seeking to stop the suspension of eight clauses of the Security Laws Amendment Act. Three appellate judges ruled that the AG did not sufficiently demonstrate how temporary suspension of the laws would jeopardize the fight against terrorism. The 8 clauses will now remain suspended until the case filed by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy i
-
Allegations of Document Fraud In Foreclosure- Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricar
-
Supreme court upholds appellate court decision in favour of teachers' 50-60% pay hike
Thousands of teachers in public primary and secondary schools will be resting easy after the Supreme court upheld the decisions of the court of appeal compelling the government to pay a 50-60 percent pay rise, until its petition challenging the increment is heard and determined. In their ruling, the Supreme court judges declined to grant a request by the Teachers Service Commission seeking to sus
-
Oral Argument in People v. Barnes, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes.
-
Not Yet Teachers! TSC to challenge award to teachers in Appellate court
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists that the pay increase can only be awarded after a job evaluation, remember Justice Ndumba Nderi in his ruling stated that the evaluation falls under the TSC and not SRC….Take a look....
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us o
-
David Allen - Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she wa...
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the ea...
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In...
wn.com/What Is An Appellate Court
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In...
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system....
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
wn.com/10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 2001
-
author: Eugene Kim
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or sec...
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Appellate Court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 2
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition....
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
wn.com/2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 124519
-
author: wlulaw
High Court can't rule on conversion cases, Appellate Court finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to...
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
wn.com/High Court Can't Rule On Conversion Cases, Appellate Court Finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
- published: 30 Dec 2015
- views: 79
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b......
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
wn.com/The Need To Knows Of Appeals The Appeals Court
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and sou...
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
wn.com/Appellate Court Nails Nsa Spying And Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 317
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014)....
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
wn.com/Oral Argument Before The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court....
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
wn.com/Assembling The Clerk's Record For Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn:...
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/
American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee
Script:
The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday.
A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215."
The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection.
The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed.
This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal.
The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.
wn.com/Appellate Court Rules Nsa's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/
American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee
Script:
The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday.
A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215."
The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection.
The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed.
This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal.
The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.
- published: 07 May 2015
- views: 3680
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the ......
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the ...
wn.com/Appellate Court Upholds Timamy Election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the ...
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 148
-
author: NTV Kenya
Abrams Verdict: Siegelman Released From Jail
Dan Abrams talks to Artur Davis and Scott Horton about the release of Don Siegelman from prison tonight, and recaps some of his coverage on the story. Now wi......
Dan Abrams talks to Artur Davis and Scott Horton about the release of Don Siegelman from prison tonight, and recaps some of his coverage on the story. Now wi...
wn.com/Abrams Verdict Siegelman Released From Jail
Dan Abrams talks to Artur Davis and Scott Horton about the release of Don Siegelman from prison tonight, and recaps some of his coverage on the story. Now wi...
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhe......
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhe...
wn.com/Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhe...
Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after ...
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service.
wn.com/Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service.
- published: 05 Nov 2014
- views: 196
Appellate Court Upholds Suspension Of 8 Security Law Clauses
Attorney General Githu Muigai has lost an application seeking to stop the suspension of eight clauses of the Security Laws Amendment Act. Three appellate judges...
Attorney General Githu Muigai has lost an application seeking to stop the suspension of eight clauses of the Security Laws Amendment Act. Three appellate judges ruled that the AG did not sufficiently demonstrate how temporary suspension of the laws would jeopardize the fight against terrorism. The 8 clauses will now remain suspended until the case filed by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy is heard and determined.
wn.com/Appellate Court Upholds Suspension Of 8 Security Law Clauses
Attorney General Githu Muigai has lost an application seeking to stop the suspension of eight clauses of the Security Laws Amendment Act. Three appellate judges ruled that the AG did not sufficiently demonstrate how temporary suspension of the laws would jeopardize the fight against terrorism. The 8 clauses will now remain suspended until the case filed by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy is heard and determined.
- published: 23 Jan 2015
- views: 212
Allegations of Document Fraud In Foreclosure- Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate com...
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
wn.com/Allegations Of Document Fraud In Foreclosure Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
- published: 11 Jun 2015
- views: 8
Supreme court upholds appellate court decision in favour of teachers' 50-60% pay hike
Thousands of teachers in public primary and secondary schools will be resting easy after the Supreme court upheld the decisions of the court of appeal compellin...
Thousands of teachers in public primary and secondary schools will be resting easy after the Supreme court upheld the decisions of the court of appeal compelling the government to pay a 50-60 percent pay rise, until its petition challenging the increment is heard and determined. In their ruling, the Supreme court judges declined to grant a request by the Teachers Service Commission seeking to suspend the court of appeal order saying the highest court in the land had no jurisdiction to hear the case.
wn.com/Supreme Court Upholds Appellate Court Decision In Favour Of Teachers' 50 60 Pay Hike
Thousands of teachers in public primary and secondary schools will be resting easy after the Supreme court upheld the decisions of the court of appeal compelling the government to pay a 50-60 percent pay rise, until its petition challenging the increment is heard and determined. In their ruling, the Supreme court judges declined to grant a request by the Teachers Service Commission seeking to suspend the court of appeal order saying the highest court in the land had no jurisdiction to hear the case.
- published: 24 Aug 2015
- views: 83
Oral Argument in People v. Barnes, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes....
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes.
wn.com/Oral Argument In People V. Barnes, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes.
- published: 14 Mar 2014
- views: 1
Not Yet Teachers! TSC to challenge award to teachers in Appellate court
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists t...
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists that the pay increase can only be awarded after a job evaluation, remember Justice Ndumba Nderi in his ruling stated that the evaluation falls under the TSC and not SRC….Take a look....
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
wn.com/Not Yet Teachers Tsc To Challenge Award To Teachers In Appellate Court
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists that the pay increase can only be awarded after a job evaluation, remember Justice Ndumba Nderi in his ruling stated that the evaluation falls under the TSC and not SRC….Take a look....
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
- published: 01 Jul 2015
- views: 19
David Allen - Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she wa......
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she wa...
wn.com/David Allen Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she wa...