-
Lecture 4 Part 1 : Overview of Judicial Precedent
-
AS Law Lecture: Judicial Precedent (1)
-
How Judicial Precedent Works,GCSE/AS Law
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/ . Make your own animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowTo
-
doctrine of precedent
An introduction to doctrine of precedent, especially for A level law
-
Judicial Precedent: Types of Precedent and Court Hierarchy AS Law
-
Judicial Precedent: Advantages and Disadvantages AS Law
-
ELS / CLRI - Judicial Reasoning - Precedent Pt 1-Law Sessions 01.mov
Judicial Reasoning - Precedent Welcome to the Official Law Sessions Youtube Channel. Subscribe NOW. DISCUSS LAW WITH US AT http://www.facebook.com/lawsession...
-
Lecture 4 Part 2 : Judicial precedent and the role of the Judges
-
Law Reporting and Judicial Precedent
An examination focused look at the importance of law reporting as one of the key features that helps precedent operate effectively.
-
4 2 Overview of Judicial Precedent
-
What Wisconsin's Abortion Decision Means For Texas
A federal court has ruled that Wisconsin’s anti-abortion laws are unconstitutional. This could mean that they will also be struck down in Texas, as it has now become judicial precedent. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian (The Point) hosts of The Young Turks discuss.
Do you think the anti-abortion laws will be struck down in Texas too? Let us know in the comments below.
Read more here: http://www.reute
-
Judicial precedent ratio and obiter
-
Judicial Precedent and the Court of Appeal
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/join -- Create animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon'
-
The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent
September 10, 2014
"The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent"
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
The Elena and Miles Zaremski Law-Medicine Forum
Speakers:
Jonathan Adler
Jonathan Entin
Jessie Hill
-
ACCA LSBF F4 ELS Doctrine of Judicial Precedent
Do your F4 with Lsbf lectures and slides available on ultimate world free of cost
-
The Court Hierarchy and Judicial Precedent
Examination focus on the court hierarchy and its importance in judicial Precedent.
-
Judicial Precedent: The Supreme Court (House of Lords) AS Law
Music Credits "Another Cycle"- Rutile.
-
4 3 Judicial precedent and the role of the Judges
-
precedent
judicial precedent.
-
2. PRECEDENT
The Law of Judges: Precedent and the Criteria for the Reporting of Cases.
-
Assange Attorney: British Ruling Sets Alarming Precedent for Judicial Independence in Europe
DemocracyNow.org - Helena Kennedy, a member of Julian Assange's legal team and a prominent British civil liberties attorney, joins us from London to discuss ...
-
Source of Law - Precedence
(in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) law is does not express nuances of the real world. So we look at precedenct. Consistency im...
-
The War on Christianity? The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Explained
A video lecture focusing on Indiana and the controversy regarding its Religious Freedom Restoration Act and anti-gay discrimination. A look through the Constitution and judicial precedent and common sense as I pretend to be Johnny Cash walking the teacher line. Be sure to subscribe to HipHughes History with over 300 videos covering the Social Studies, it's stupid easy and free https://www.youtube.
How Judicial Precedent Works,GCSE/AS Law
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/ . Make your own animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free too...
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/ . Make your own animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon's animation templates help you create animated presentations and animated explainer videos from scratch. Anyone can produce awesome animations quickly with PowToon, without the cost or hassle other professional animation services require.
wn.com/How Judicial Precedent Works,Gcse As Law
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/ . Make your own animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon's animation templates help you create animated presentations and animated explainer videos from scratch. Anyone can produce awesome animations quickly with PowToon, without the cost or hassle other professional animation services require.
- published: 20 Oct 2014
- views: 3
doctrine of precedent
An introduction to doctrine of precedent, especially for A level law...
An introduction to doctrine of precedent, especially for A level law
wn.com/Doctrine Of Precedent
An introduction to doctrine of precedent, especially for A level law
- published: 27 Jun 2014
- views: 6
ELS / CLRI - Judicial Reasoning - Precedent Pt 1-Law Sessions 01.mov
Judicial Reasoning - Precedent Welcome to the Official Law Sessions Youtube Channel. Subscribe NOW. DISCUSS LAW WITH US AT http://www.facebook.com/lawsession......
Judicial Reasoning - Precedent Welcome to the Official Law Sessions Youtube Channel. Subscribe NOW. DISCUSS LAW WITH US AT http://www.facebook.com/lawsession...
wn.com/Els Clri Judicial Reasoning Precedent Pt 1 Law Sessions 01.Mov
Judicial Reasoning - Precedent Welcome to the Official Law Sessions Youtube Channel. Subscribe NOW. DISCUSS LAW WITH US AT http://www.facebook.com/lawsession...
Law Reporting and Judicial Precedent
An examination focused look at the importance of law reporting as one of the key features that helps precedent operate effectively....
An examination focused look at the importance of law reporting as one of the key features that helps precedent operate effectively.
wn.com/Law Reporting And Judicial Precedent
An examination focused look at the importance of law reporting as one of the key features that helps precedent operate effectively.
What Wisconsin's Abortion Decision Means For Texas
A federal court has ruled that Wisconsin’s anti-abortion laws are unconstitutional. This could mean that they will also be struck down in Texas, as it has now b...
A federal court has ruled that Wisconsin’s anti-abortion laws are unconstitutional. This could mean that they will also be struck down in Texas, as it has now become judicial precedent. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian (The Point) hosts of The Young Turks discuss.
Do you think the anti-abortion laws will be struck down in Texas too? Let us know in the comments below.
Read more here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/24/us-wisconsin-abortion-idUSKBN0TD00220151124
“A Wisconsin law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital is unconstitutional, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Monday, addressing a topic the U.S. Supreme Court is considering during its current term.
Abortion providers in Wisconsin had challenged the state law, which requires doctors to have privileges at a hospital within 30 miles (50 km). The law's supporters said the measure ensures continuity of care while opponents say it serves almost no public health value and is intended to shut clinics.
A federal judge in March permanently blocked the Wisconsin law, ruling that the health benefits, if any, were outweighed by the burden on women's health caused by restricted access to abortion.”
***
Get The Young Turks Mobile App Today!
Download the iOS version here: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/the-young-turks/id412793195?ls=1&mt;=8
Download the Android version here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tyt
wn.com/What Wisconsin's Abortion Decision Means For Texas
A federal court has ruled that Wisconsin’s anti-abortion laws are unconstitutional. This could mean that they will also be struck down in Texas, as it has now become judicial precedent. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian (The Point) hosts of The Young Turks discuss.
Do you think the anti-abortion laws will be struck down in Texas too? Let us know in the comments below.
Read more here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/24/us-wisconsin-abortion-idUSKBN0TD00220151124
“A Wisconsin law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital is unconstitutional, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Monday, addressing a topic the U.S. Supreme Court is considering during its current term.
Abortion providers in Wisconsin had challenged the state law, which requires doctors to have privileges at a hospital within 30 miles (50 km). The law's supporters said the measure ensures continuity of care while opponents say it serves almost no public health value and is intended to shut clinics.
A federal judge in March permanently blocked the Wisconsin law, ruling that the health benefits, if any, were outweighed by the burden on women's health caused by restricted access to abortion.”
***
Get The Young Turks Mobile App Today!
Download the iOS version here: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/the-young-turks/id412793195?ls=1&mt;=8
Download the Android version here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tyt
- published: 29 Nov 2015
- views: 9378
Judicial Precedent and the Court of Appeal
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/join -- Create animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool t...
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/join -- Create animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon's animation templates help you create animated presentations and animated explainer videos from scratch. Anyone can produce awesome animations quickly with PowToon, without the cost or hassle other professional animation services require.
wn.com/Judicial Precedent And The Court Of Appeal
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/join -- Create animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon's animation templates help you create animated presentations and animated explainer videos from scratch. Anyone can produce awesome animations quickly with PowToon, without the cost or hassle other professional animation services require.
- published: 28 May 2015
- views: 17
The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent
September 10, 2014
"The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent"
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
The Elena ...
September 10, 2014
"The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent"
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
The Elena and Miles Zaremski Law-Medicine Forum
Speakers:
Jonathan Adler
Jonathan Entin
Jessie Hill
wn.com/The Hobby Lobby Decision Its Effect On Reproductive Rights And Judicial Precedent
September 10, 2014
"The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent"
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
The Elena and Miles Zaremski Law-Medicine Forum
Speakers:
Jonathan Adler
Jonathan Entin
Jessie Hill
- published: 18 Sep 2014
- views: 13
ACCA LSBF F4 ELS Doctrine of Judicial Precedent
Do your F4 with Lsbf lectures and slides available on ultimate world free of cost...
Do your F4 with Lsbf lectures and slides available on ultimate world free of cost
wn.com/Acca Lsbf F4 Els Doctrine Of Judicial Precedent
Do your F4 with Lsbf lectures and slides available on ultimate world free of cost
- published: 11 Jun 2015
- views: 18
The Court Hierarchy and Judicial Precedent
Examination focus on the court hierarchy and its importance in judicial Precedent....
Examination focus on the court hierarchy and its importance in judicial Precedent.
wn.com/The Court Hierarchy And Judicial Precedent
Examination focus on the court hierarchy and its importance in judicial Precedent.
precedent
judicial precedent....
judicial precedent.
wn.com/Precedent
judicial precedent.
- published: 22 Jan 2013
- views: 2475
-
author: js012a
2. PRECEDENT
The Law of Judges: Precedent and the Criteria for the Reporting of Cases....
The Law of Judges: Precedent and the Criteria for the Reporting of Cases.
wn.com/2. Precedent
The Law of Judges: Precedent and the Criteria for the Reporting of Cases.
Assange Attorney: British Ruling Sets Alarming Precedent for Judicial Independence in Europe
DemocracyNow.org - Helena Kennedy, a member of Julian Assange's legal team and a prominent British civil liberties attorney, joins us from London to discuss ......
DemocracyNow.org - Helena Kennedy, a member of Julian Assange's legal team and a prominent British civil liberties attorney, joins us from London to discuss ...
wn.com/Assange Attorney British Ruling Sets Alarming Precedent For Judicial Independence In Europe
DemocracyNow.org - Helena Kennedy, a member of Julian Assange's legal team and a prominent British civil liberties attorney, joins us from London to discuss ...
Source of Law - Precedence
(in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) law is does not express nuances of the real world. So we look at precedenct. Consistency im......
(in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) law is does not express nuances of the real world. So we look at precedenct. Consistency im...
wn.com/Source Of Law Precedence
(in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) law is does not express nuances of the real world. So we look at precedenct. Consistency im...
The War on Christianity? The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Explained
A video lecture focusing on Indiana and the controversy regarding its Religious Freedom Restoration Act and anti-gay discrimination. A look through the Constitu...
A video lecture focusing on Indiana and the controversy regarding its Religious Freedom Restoration Act and anti-gay discrimination. A look through the Constitution and judicial precedent and common sense as I pretend to be Johnny Cash walking the teacher line. Be sure to subscribe to HipHughes History with over 300 videos covering the Social Studies, it's stupid easy and free https://www.youtube.com/user/hughesdv?sub_confirmation=1&src_vid=hDjLSfWvNlQ&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_3651517591
wn.com/The War On Christianity The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Explained
A video lecture focusing on Indiana and the controversy regarding its Religious Freedom Restoration Act and anti-gay discrimination. A look through the Constitution and judicial precedent and common sense as I pretend to be Johnny Cash walking the teacher line. Be sure to subscribe to HipHughes History with over 300 videos covering the Social Studies, it's stupid easy and free https://www.youtube.com/user/hughesdv?sub_confirmation=1&src_vid=hDjLSfWvNlQ&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_3651517591
- published: 06 Apr 2015
- views: 1376
-
ACCA LSBF F4 ELS Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Low
-
Puai Wichman Interview with Bob Baumann of the Sovereign Society - Asset Protection
The Cook Islands is highly regarded for its "Asset Protection Trusts" legislation, which has since inception been adopted by many offshore centers. The Cook Islands boasts a strong judicial precedent, which sets it aside from it's competitors.
For frequently asked questions on the Cook Islands and the services provided by Ora Fiduciary, listen to a live interview conducted by Bob Bauman of the So
-
Introduction to Precedent part 2/2
The second video of two that introduces Advanced level law students to an overview of the key features of Judicial Precedent. Part two also provides some gen...
-
Precedent Introduction Part 1
The first part of a two part introduction to Judicial Precedent for AS level law students. The exam focus is particularly AQA relevant. Part two looks more closely at an exam question that is based around the introductory material.
-
5 4 Lecture 4 Part 2 Judicial precedent and the role of the Judges 815)
-
5 3 Lecture 4 Part 1 Overview of Judicial Precedent 950)
Puai Wichman Interview with Bob Baumann of the Sovereign Society - Asset Protection
The Cook Islands is highly regarded for its "Asset Protection Trusts" legislation, which has since inception been adopted by many offshore centers. The Cook Isl...
The Cook Islands is highly regarded for its "Asset Protection Trusts" legislation, which has since inception been adopted by many offshore centers. The Cook Islands boasts a strong judicial precedent, which sets it aside from it's competitors.
For frequently asked questions on the Cook Islands and the services provided by Ora Fiduciary, listen to a live interview conducted by Bob Bauman of the Sovereign Society, with Puai T. Wichman, Managing Director of Ora Fiduciary (Cook Islands) Limited.
wn.com/Puai Wichman Interview With Bob Baumann Of The Sovereign Society Asset Protection
The Cook Islands is highly regarded for its "Asset Protection Trusts" legislation, which has since inception been adopted by many offshore centers. The Cook Islands boasts a strong judicial precedent, which sets it aside from it's competitors.
For frequently asked questions on the Cook Islands and the services provided by Ora Fiduciary, listen to a live interview conducted by Bob Bauman of the Sovereign Society, with Puai T. Wichman, Managing Director of Ora Fiduciary (Cook Islands) Limited.
- published: 14 Nov 2014
- views: 1
Introduction to Precedent part 2/2
The second video of two that introduces Advanced level law students to an overview of the key features of Judicial Precedent. Part two also provides some gen......
The second video of two that introduces Advanced level law students to an overview of the key features of Judicial Precedent. Part two also provides some gen...
wn.com/Introduction To Precedent Part 2 2
The second video of two that introduces Advanced level law students to an overview of the key features of Judicial Precedent. Part two also provides some gen...
Precedent Introduction Part 1
The first part of a two part introduction to Judicial Precedent for AS level law students. The exam focus is particularly AQA relevant. Part two looks more clos...
The first part of a two part introduction to Judicial Precedent for AS level law students. The exam focus is particularly AQA relevant. Part two looks more closely at an exam question that is based around the introductory material.
wn.com/Precedent Introduction Part 1
The first part of a two part introduction to Judicial Precedent for AS level law students. The exam focus is particularly AQA relevant. Part two looks more closely at an exam question that is based around the introductory material.
- published: 14 Sep 2013
- views: 113
-
Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision-making”
Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision-making: A review, recent results, and an agenda”
It is thought to be a truism that judges cite and follow precedent. Clearly judges cite prior cases, but do they really follow precedent or cherry pick cases that support their conclusions? And how do we square these truisms with evidence that judges are political? Professor Malani surveys what the l
-
'IP in Transition: Desperately seeking the Big Picture' - Dr Jeremy Phillips
Melbourne Law School presents free public lecture 'Intellectual Property in Transition: Desperately Seeking the Big Picture' presented in conjunction with The Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys.
Pulled back into the past by legislative intent and judicial precedent, they are propelled forwards by new technologies, increasingly specialised laws and creative business structures. And they
-
Desh Deshantar - Former CJI as Governor: Is it setting bad a precedent for neutrality of judiciary?
Guests: Vinod Sharma (Political Editor, Hindustan Times) ; M Afzal Wani (Prof. of Law, I P University) ; Vivek Goyal (Co-Convener, Legal Cell, BJP) ; Vikas Singh (Former Additional Solicitor...
-
Life on the Bench
Many attorneys see a judgeship as the pinnacle of professional achievement in the legal world. It could be the visibility of judges, their unquestioned decision-making authority, the absence of clients, life tenure, or some other aspect of being a judge. Our panel of judges will discuss the realities of a career on the bench. The panelists will share their thoughts on topics as diverse as the role
-
Civil law (legal system)
Civil law (or civilian law) is a legal system originating in Europe, intellectualized within the framework of late Roman law, and whose most prevalent feature is that its core principles are codified into a referable system which serves as the primary source of law. This can be contrasted with common law systems whose intellectual framework comes from judge-made decisional law which gives preceden
-
Sylvia Stolz "The Reality of Freedom of Expression" Full Speech, Uncut
The historic speech by dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz, uncut and fully translated. The speech they want to put Stolz in prison for, the speech they don't want you to hear.
On 24 November 2012, dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz appeared at the eighth annual meeting of the "Anti-Censorship Coalition" in Chur, Switzerland, where she presented a speech entitled "Speech Forbidden, Evidence F
-
2D13-499
Weidner Law Florida Appellate Court Oral Argument Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-499
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides consultations within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents parties in state and fed
-
An Examination of Substantive Due Process and Judicial Activism 11-17-12
The Federalist Society closed its 2012 National Lawyers Convention with Showcase Panel IV. After it became clear at the oral argument the health care mandate...
-
Common law
A common law legal system is a system of law characterized by case law which is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals. Co...
-
17th Justice William J. Brennan Jr. Lecture on State Courts and Social Justice
Hon. Paul J. De Muniz, Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court, delivers the lecture, entitled "Overruling Precedent: The Case For Judicial Activism in Re-...
-
Common Law: The role of precedent, LLB Study Weekend 2011
Dr Adam Geary, Reader in Law at Birkbeck, University of London, provides a lecture on Common law and the role of precedent. To find out more about our underg...
-
Who's Activist Now?: The Roberts Court in History
For a generation or more, conservatives have condemned liberal judges as "activists"—dedicated to an ideological agenda, dismissive of precedent and the prov...
-
Understanding Reproductive Justice: Panel 1
October 30, 2015
What's the Harm? Understanding Reproductive Justice
Panel 1: Harm to Law
This panel will explore how recent abortion jurisprudence threatens to distort other constitutional principles, including liberty, dignity, and precedent. For example, in considering the constitutionality of mandatory ultrasound laws, some courts have been tempted to overlook First Amendment protections and
-
Supreme Court: The Term in Review (2013-2014) Part 1 of 2
An end of the term analysis and discussion of decisions reached by the Court during the recently concluded term that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges. The program features a panel of nationally known experts who explain the significance of the decisions to the federal courts.
In Part 1:
Freedom of Speech and Religion: The panel looks at the Court's decisions affecting the reli
-
Reg Howe talks to James Turk
Subscribe to our newsletter at http://www.goldmoney.com/goldresearch. Reginald Howe, of http://www.goldensextant.com/, and James Turk, Director of the GoldMo...
-
DELHI JUDICIAL ACADEMY
This Film was made while I was the Chairperson of the Delhi Judicial Academy during 2009-2011. It focuses on its history and the range of training programmes conducted for judicial officers in Delhi. It was fun and education at the same time - specially for me! :)
-
Parliamentary sovereignty
Parliamentary sovereignty is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty, and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. It also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so it is not bound by written law or by precedent.
Pa
-
How Judges Decide Cases: Inside the Judicial Decision-Making Process - Lawyers & Jury Trials (1990)
The judiciary (also known as the judicial system' or court system) is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. The ...
-
LAWS12061 02 2015 The Framework for Judicial Review
LAWS12061 02 2015 The Framework for Judicial Review. This presentation is part of a course on Administrative Law presented by Brett Eurell, CQUniversity Australia. www.cqu.edu.au/law
The full course may be viewed on iTunesU at the CQUniversity site. Visit CQU Law on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/CQU-Law.
-
Good Law; A Judicial Perspective - Lord Toulson
On Monday 30 June 2014, Lord Toulson gave an address entitled 'Good Law: A Judicial Perspective' at the Supreme Court, in front of an audience of government lawyers and other invited guests.
In the lecture, Lord Toulson underlined the potential impact on the rule of law when legislation is not drafted clearly, and outlined a number of steps legislators and Parliamentary Counsel could take to ass
Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision-making”
Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision-making: A review, recent results, and an agenda”
It is thought to be a truism that judges cite and follow precede...
Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision-making: A review, recent results, and an agenda”
It is thought to be a truism that judges cite and follow precedent. Clearly judges cite prior cases, but do they really follow precedent or cherry pick cases that support their conclusions? And how do we square these truisms with evidence that judges are political? Professor Malani surveys what the legal and political science literature has discovered about judicial decision-making and talks about his work studying federal circuit splits to understand whether and how judges rely on precedent.
Anup Malani is the Lee and Brena Freeman Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School.
This talk was recorded on November 3, 2015, as part of the Chicago’s Best Ideas lecture series.
wn.com/Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision Making”
Anup Malani, “Understanding Judicial Decision-making: A review, recent results, and an agenda”
It is thought to be a truism that judges cite and follow precedent. Clearly judges cite prior cases, but do they really follow precedent or cherry pick cases that support their conclusions? And how do we square these truisms with evidence that judges are political? Professor Malani surveys what the legal and political science literature has discovered about judicial decision-making and talks about his work studying federal circuit splits to understand whether and how judges rely on precedent.
Anup Malani is the Lee and Brena Freeman Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School.
This talk was recorded on November 3, 2015, as part of the Chicago’s Best Ideas lecture series.
- published: 17 Nov 2015
- views: 36
'IP in Transition: Desperately seeking the Big Picture' - Dr Jeremy Phillips
Melbourne Law School presents free public lecture 'Intellectual Property in Transition: Desperately Seeking the Big Picture' presented in conjunction with The I...
Melbourne Law School presents free public lecture 'Intellectual Property in Transition: Desperately Seeking the Big Picture' presented in conjunction with The Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys.
Pulled back into the past by legislative intent and judicial precedent, they are propelled forwards by new technologies, increasingly specialised laws and creative business structures. And they are subject to the constants of the need for justice, the requirement of legal predictability and the demand of due process.
Is there a Big Picture: a vision that can be shared by legislators, IP owners and their lawyers and attorneys? If so, what does it look like?
Generously sponsored by: IP Australia, AIPPI Australia, FICPI Australia, LESANZ, IPSANZ
wn.com/'IP In Transition Desperately Seeking The Big Picture' Dr Jeremy Phillips
Melbourne Law School presents free public lecture 'Intellectual Property in Transition: Desperately Seeking the Big Picture' presented in conjunction with The Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys.
Pulled back into the past by legislative intent and judicial precedent, they are propelled forwards by new technologies, increasingly specialised laws and creative business structures. And they are subject to the constants of the need for justice, the requirement of legal predictability and the demand of due process.
Is there a Big Picture: a vision that can be shared by legislators, IP owners and their lawyers and attorneys? If so, what does it look like?
Generously sponsored by: IP Australia, AIPPI Australia, FICPI Australia, LESANZ, IPSANZ
- published: 26 Nov 2014
- views: 3
Desh Deshantar - Former CJI as Governor: Is it setting bad a precedent for neutrality of judiciary?
Guests: Vinod Sharma (Political Editor, Hindustan Times) ; M Afzal Wani (Prof. of Law, I P University) ; Vivek Goyal (Co-Convener, Legal Cell, BJP) ; Vikas Sing...
Guests: Vinod Sharma (Political Editor, Hindustan Times) ; M Afzal Wani (Prof. of Law, I P University) ; Vivek Goyal (Co-Convener, Legal Cell, BJP) ; Vikas Singh (Former Additional Solicitor...
wn.com/Desh Deshantar Former Cji As Governor Is It Setting Bad A Precedent For Neutrality Of Judiciary
Guests: Vinod Sharma (Political Editor, Hindustan Times) ; M Afzal Wani (Prof. of Law, I P University) ; Vivek Goyal (Co-Convener, Legal Cell, BJP) ; Vikas Singh (Former Additional Solicitor...
Life on the Bench
Many attorneys see a judgeship as the pinnacle of professional achievement in the legal world. It could be the visibility of judges, their unquestioned decision...
Many attorneys see a judgeship as the pinnacle of professional achievement in the legal world. It could be the visibility of judges, their unquestioned decision-making authority, the absence of clients, life tenure, or some other aspect of being a judge. Our panel of judges will discuss the realities of a career on the bench. The panelists will share their thoughts on topics as diverse as the role of the judiciary, judicial philosophy, stare decisis and precedent, opinions and dissents, the judicial appointment process, the state of the legal profession, and much more.
Special Session: Life on the Bench
--Hon. Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
--Hon. Alex Kozinski, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
--Hon. Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
--Hon. Jerry Smith, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
--Hon. David Stras, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of Minnesota
--Moderator: Hon. David B. Sentelle, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
wn.com/Life On The Bench
Many attorneys see a judgeship as the pinnacle of professional achievement in the legal world. It could be the visibility of judges, their unquestioned decision-making authority, the absence of clients, life tenure, or some other aspect of being a judge. Our panel of judges will discuss the realities of a career on the bench. The panelists will share their thoughts on topics as diverse as the role of the judiciary, judicial philosophy, stare decisis and precedent, opinions and dissents, the judicial appointment process, the state of the legal profession, and much more.
Special Session: Life on the Bench
--Hon. Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
--Hon. Alex Kozinski, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
--Hon. Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
--Hon. Jerry Smith, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
--Hon. David Stras, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of Minnesota
--Moderator: Hon. David B. Sentelle, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
- published: 15 Nov 2015
- views: 13
Civil law (legal system)
Civil law (or civilian law) is a legal system originating in Europe, intellectualized within the framework of late Roman law, and whose most prevalent feature i...
Civil law (or civilian law) is a legal system originating in Europe, intellectualized within the framework of late Roman law, and whose most prevalent feature is that its core principles are codified into a referable system which serves as the primary source of law. This can be contrasted with common law systems whose intellectual framework comes from judge-made decisional law which gives precedential authority to prior court decisions on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions (doctrine of judicial precedent ; stare decisis).
Historically, a civil law is the group of legal ideas and systems ultimately derived from the Code of Justinian, but heavily overlaid by Napoleonic, Germanic, canonical, feudal, and local practices, as well as doctrinal strains such as natural law, codification, and legal positivism.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Civil Law (Legal System)
Civil law (or civilian law) is a legal system originating in Europe, intellectualized within the framework of late Roman law, and whose most prevalent feature is that its core principles are codified into a referable system which serves as the primary source of law. This can be contrasted with common law systems whose intellectual framework comes from judge-made decisional law which gives precedential authority to prior court decisions on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different occasions (doctrine of judicial precedent ; stare decisis).
Historically, a civil law is the group of legal ideas and systems ultimately derived from the Code of Justinian, but heavily overlaid by Napoleonic, Germanic, canonical, feudal, and local practices, as well as doctrinal strains such as natural law, codification, and legal positivism.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 15 Aug 2014
- views: 1304
Sylvia Stolz "The Reality of Freedom of Expression" Full Speech, Uncut
The historic speech by dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz, uncut and fully translated. The speech they want to put Stolz in prison for, the speech they don't ...
The historic speech by dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz, uncut and fully translated. The speech they want to put Stolz in prison for, the speech they don't want you to hear.
On 24 November 2012, dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz appeared at the eighth annual meeting of the "Anti-Censorship Coalition" in Chur, Switzerland, where she presented a speech entitled "Speech Forbidden, Evidence Forbidden, Legal Defence Forbidden: The Reality of Freedom of Expression" (Sprechverbot, Beweisverbot, Verteidigungsverbot: Die Wirklichkeit der Meinungsfreiheit). This video is a recording of that speech, complete and uncut. Previous subtitled versions circulating online as the "Full Speech" have actually included less than half of Stolz's presentation. This version gratefully incorporates much of the subtitling of the earlier 44-minute version, but also revises that translation in places, in particular to bring out more clearly the legal issues that are at the heart of Stolz's argument. As such, this new version is not only more complete, but hopefully more legally accurate as well.
In the speech, Stolz discusses her experiences as a defence lawyer for so-called Holocaust deniers in Germany, and describes the Orwellian system of state-enforced repression there which denies defendants (and their lawyers!) the right to explain themselves under threat of additional charges for the "repeat offence" of expressing a forbidden idea, even in their own defence in a court of law. Stolz further relates how the subject of the Holocaust itself has never been clearly or adequately defined by the German courts through the normal channel of judicial findings-of-fact in precedent decisions. Instead, the courts have relied on the arbitrary doctrine that the facts of the Holocaust are "self-evident" and thus in no need of proof, despite the obvious objection that the arguments of the "deniers" themselves clearly demonstrate that those facts are indeed contestable and thus cannot be "self-evident" by definition.
In the face of such abuses and absurdities, other lawyers might throw up their hands and simply walk away: Sylvia Stolz has the courage to call injustice what it is, and take a stand. Her speech is an extraordinary document of our times, a deeply moving call "to think what is true, to feel what is beautiful, and to want what is good." Wherever you may fall along the ideological spectrum, if you believe in freedom of expression, this speech is a must.
And of course there's one last outrageous twist to the story. On 25 February 2015, the German legal system heaped shame upon itself once more by sentencing Sylvia Stolz to twenty months in prison for "racial incitation" on the basis of what she says in this video. So watch and listen carefully and ask yourself . . . who are the real "fascists" here?
(Subtitles by A Friend and R J Tucker, with editorial input by Kladderadatsch.)
wn.com/Sylvia Stolz The Reality Of Freedom Of Expression Full Speech, Uncut
The historic speech by dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz, uncut and fully translated. The speech they want to put Stolz in prison for, the speech they don't want you to hear.
On 24 November 2012, dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz appeared at the eighth annual meeting of the "Anti-Censorship Coalition" in Chur, Switzerland, where she presented a speech entitled "Speech Forbidden, Evidence Forbidden, Legal Defence Forbidden: The Reality of Freedom of Expression" (Sprechverbot, Beweisverbot, Verteidigungsverbot: Die Wirklichkeit der Meinungsfreiheit). This video is a recording of that speech, complete and uncut. Previous subtitled versions circulating online as the "Full Speech" have actually included less than half of Stolz's presentation. This version gratefully incorporates much of the subtitling of the earlier 44-minute version, but also revises that translation in places, in particular to bring out more clearly the legal issues that are at the heart of Stolz's argument. As such, this new version is not only more complete, but hopefully more legally accurate as well.
In the speech, Stolz discusses her experiences as a defence lawyer for so-called Holocaust deniers in Germany, and describes the Orwellian system of state-enforced repression there which denies defendants (and their lawyers!) the right to explain themselves under threat of additional charges for the "repeat offence" of expressing a forbidden idea, even in their own defence in a court of law. Stolz further relates how the subject of the Holocaust itself has never been clearly or adequately defined by the German courts through the normal channel of judicial findings-of-fact in precedent decisions. Instead, the courts have relied on the arbitrary doctrine that the facts of the Holocaust are "self-evident" and thus in no need of proof, despite the obvious objection that the arguments of the "deniers" themselves clearly demonstrate that those facts are indeed contestable and thus cannot be "self-evident" by definition.
In the face of such abuses and absurdities, other lawyers might throw up their hands and simply walk away: Sylvia Stolz has the courage to call injustice what it is, and take a stand. Her speech is an extraordinary document of our times, a deeply moving call "to think what is true, to feel what is beautiful, and to want what is good." Wherever you may fall along the ideological spectrum, if you believe in freedom of expression, this speech is a must.
And of course there's one last outrageous twist to the story. On 25 February 2015, the German legal system heaped shame upon itself once more by sentencing Sylvia Stolz to twenty months in prison for "racial incitation" on the basis of what she says in this video. So watch and listen carefully and ask yourself . . . who are the real "fascists" here?
(Subtitles by A Friend and R J Tucker, with editorial input by Kladderadatsch.)
- published: 16 Mar 2015
- views: 85
2D13-499
Weidner Law Florida Appellate Court Oral Argument Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-499
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions an...
Weidner Law Florida Appellate Court Oral Argument Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-499
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides consultations within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents parties in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
wn.com/2D13 499
Weidner Law Florida Appellate Court Oral Argument Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-499
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides consultations within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents parties in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
- published: 25 May 2015
- views: 2
An Examination of Substantive Due Process and Judicial Activism 11-17-12
The Federalist Society closed its 2012 National Lawyers Convention with Showcase Panel IV. After it became clear at the oral argument the health care mandate......
The Federalist Society closed its 2012 National Lawyers Convention with Showcase Panel IV. After it became clear at the oral argument the health care mandate...
wn.com/An Examination Of Substantive Due Process And Judicial Activism 11 17 12
The Federalist Society closed its 2012 National Lawyers Convention with Showcase Panel IV. After it became clear at the oral argument the health care mandate...
Common law
A common law legal system is a system of law characterized by case law which is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals. Co......
A common law legal system is a system of law characterized by case law which is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals. Co...
wn.com/Common Law
A common law legal system is a system of law characterized by case law which is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals. Co...
- published: 09 Mar 2014
- views: 405
-
author: Audiopedia
17th Justice William J. Brennan Jr. Lecture on State Courts and Social Justice
Hon. Paul J. De Muniz, Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court, delivers the lecture, entitled "Overruling Precedent: The Case For Judicial Activism in Re-......
Hon. Paul J. De Muniz, Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court, delivers the lecture, entitled "Overruling Precedent: The Case For Judicial Activism in Re-...
wn.com/17Th Justice William J. Brennan Jr. Lecture On State Courts And Social Justice
Hon. Paul J. De Muniz, Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court, delivers the lecture, entitled "Overruling Precedent: The Case For Judicial Activism in Re-...
Common Law: The role of precedent, LLB Study Weekend 2011
Dr Adam Geary, Reader in Law at Birkbeck, University of London, provides a lecture on Common law and the role of precedent. To find out more about our underg......
Dr Adam Geary, Reader in Law at Birkbeck, University of London, provides a lecture on Common law and the role of precedent. To find out more about our underg...
wn.com/Common Law The Role Of Precedent, Llb Study Weekend 2011
Dr Adam Geary, Reader in Law at Birkbeck, University of London, provides a lecture on Common law and the role of precedent. To find out more about our underg...
Who's Activist Now?: The Roberts Court in History
For a generation or more, conservatives have condemned liberal judges as "activists"—dedicated to an ideological agenda, dismissive of precedent and the prov......
For a generation or more, conservatives have condemned liberal judges as "activists"—dedicated to an ideological agenda, dismissive of precedent and the prov...
wn.com/Who's Activist Now The Roberts Court In History
For a generation or more, conservatives have condemned liberal judges as "activists"—dedicated to an ideological agenda, dismissive of precedent and the prov...
Understanding Reproductive Justice: Panel 1
October 30, 2015
What's the Harm? Understanding Reproductive Justice
Panel 1: Harm to Law
This panel will explore how recent abortion jurisprudence threatens ...
October 30, 2015
What's the Harm? Understanding Reproductive Justice
Panel 1: Harm to Law
This panel will explore how recent abortion jurisprudence threatens to distort other constitutional principles, including liberty, dignity, and precedent. For example, in considering the constitutionality of mandatory ultrasound laws, some courts have been tempted to overlook First Amendment protections and instead base their opinions wholly on Planned Parenthood v. Casey’s undue
burden standard. In the recent Texas case challenging targeted regulation of abortion providers (“TRAP” laws), the 5th Circuit has gone so far as to imply that judicial review should amount to a rubber stamp, with little concern for the factual basis underlying the state’s purported interest in women’s health. This panel will address what meaningful review should be and to what extent courts must ask whether the laws at issue truly advance their stated goals. What is the larger legal impact when courts uphold pretextual laws?
Moderator:
Kenji Yoshino, Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law
Panelists:
Caitlin Borgmann, Executive Director, ACLU of Montana
Richard Epstein, Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law; Director, Classical Liberal Institute, New York University School of Law
Neil Siegel, David W. Ichel Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, Duke Law
Stephanie Toti, Senior Counsel, Center for Reproductive Rights
wn.com/Understanding Reproductive Justice Panel 1
October 30, 2015
What's the Harm? Understanding Reproductive Justice
Panel 1: Harm to Law
This panel will explore how recent abortion jurisprudence threatens to distort other constitutional principles, including liberty, dignity, and precedent. For example, in considering the constitutionality of mandatory ultrasound laws, some courts have been tempted to overlook First Amendment protections and instead base their opinions wholly on Planned Parenthood v. Casey’s undue
burden standard. In the recent Texas case challenging targeted regulation of abortion providers (“TRAP” laws), the 5th Circuit has gone so far as to imply that judicial review should amount to a rubber stamp, with little concern for the factual basis underlying the state’s purported interest in women’s health. This panel will address what meaningful review should be and to what extent courts must ask whether the laws at issue truly advance their stated goals. What is the larger legal impact when courts uphold pretextual laws?
Moderator:
Kenji Yoshino, Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law
Panelists:
Caitlin Borgmann, Executive Director, ACLU of Montana
Richard Epstein, Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law; Director, Classical Liberal Institute, New York University School of Law
Neil Siegel, David W. Ichel Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, Duke Law
Stephanie Toti, Senior Counsel, Center for Reproductive Rights
- published: 09 Nov 2015
- views: 11
Supreme Court: The Term in Review (2013-2014) Part 1 of 2
An end of the term analysis and discussion of decisions reached by the Court during the recently concluded term that are most likely to affect the work of feder...
An end of the term analysis and discussion of decisions reached by the Court during the recently concluded term that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges. The program features a panel of nationally known experts who explain the significance of the decisions to the federal courts.
In Part 1:
Freedom of Speech and Religion: The panel looks at the Court's decisions affecting the religious freedom rights of closely held corporations, the constitutionality of government bodies beginning meetings with prayer, whether "buffer zones" around abortion clinics violate the free speech rights of anti-abortion counselors, and other related issues.
Fourth Amendment: This segment focuses on whether police require a warrant in searching a cell phone seized incident to an arrest, as well as other search and seizure questions.
Civil Rights: This segment discusses a broad array of issues, including the proper test for determining when a death row inmate possesses too low an I.Q. to be executed under Supreme Court precedent, the use of affirmative action in college admissions, and when federal officers may expect to be granted partial immunity for actions taken in the line of duty.
Criminal Law and Trial Rights: A look at five decisions in the areas of criminal law and trial rights.
Faculty: Jim Chance (Federal Judicial Center), Dean Erwin Chemerinsky (University of California, Irvine - School of Law, John S. Cooke (Federal Judicial Center), Professor Michelle M. Harner (University of Maryland School of Law), Professor Evan Lee (University of California - Hastings College of Law), Professor Laurie Levenson (Loyola Law School), Professor John R. Thomas (Georgetown University Law Center), Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt University Law School), and Elizabeth C. Wiggins (Federal Judicial Center). (July 2014)
wn.com/Supreme Court The Term In Review (2013 2014) Part 1 Of 2
An end of the term analysis and discussion of decisions reached by the Court during the recently concluded term that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges. The program features a panel of nationally known experts who explain the significance of the decisions to the federal courts.
In Part 1:
Freedom of Speech and Religion: The panel looks at the Court's decisions affecting the religious freedom rights of closely held corporations, the constitutionality of government bodies beginning meetings with prayer, whether "buffer zones" around abortion clinics violate the free speech rights of anti-abortion counselors, and other related issues.
Fourth Amendment: This segment focuses on whether police require a warrant in searching a cell phone seized incident to an arrest, as well as other search and seizure questions.
Civil Rights: This segment discusses a broad array of issues, including the proper test for determining when a death row inmate possesses too low an I.Q. to be executed under Supreme Court precedent, the use of affirmative action in college admissions, and when federal officers may expect to be granted partial immunity for actions taken in the line of duty.
Criminal Law and Trial Rights: A look at five decisions in the areas of criminal law and trial rights.
Faculty: Jim Chance (Federal Judicial Center), Dean Erwin Chemerinsky (University of California, Irvine - School of Law, John S. Cooke (Federal Judicial Center), Professor Michelle M. Harner (University of Maryland School of Law), Professor Evan Lee (University of California - Hastings College of Law), Professor Laurie Levenson (Loyola Law School), Professor John R. Thomas (Georgetown University Law Center), Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt University Law School), and Elizabeth C. Wiggins (Federal Judicial Center). (July 2014)
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 8
Reg Howe talks to James Turk
Subscribe to our newsletter at http://www.goldmoney.com/goldresearch. Reginald Howe, of http://www.goldensextant.com/, and James Turk, Director of the GoldMo......
Subscribe to our newsletter at http://www.goldmoney.com/goldresearch. Reginald Howe, of http://www.goldensextant.com/, and James Turk, Director of the GoldMo...
wn.com/Reg Howe Talks To James Turk
Subscribe to our newsletter at http://www.goldmoney.com/goldresearch. Reginald Howe, of http://www.goldensextant.com/, and James Turk, Director of the GoldMo...
DELHI JUDICIAL ACADEMY
This Film was made while I was the Chairperson of the Delhi Judicial Academy during 2009-2011. It focuses on its history and the range of training programmes co...
This Film was made while I was the Chairperson of the Delhi Judicial Academy during 2009-2011. It focuses on its history and the range of training programmes conducted for judicial officers in Delhi. It was fun and education at the same time - specially for me! :)
wn.com/Delhi Judicial Academy
This Film was made while I was the Chairperson of the Delhi Judicial Academy during 2009-2011. It focuses on its history and the range of training programmes conducted for judicial officers in Delhi. It was fun and education at the same time - specially for me! :)
- published: 01 Oct 2014
- views: 63
Parliamentary sovereignty
Parliamentary sovereignty is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty,...
Parliamentary sovereignty is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty, and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. It also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so it is not bound by written law or by precedent.
Parliamentary sovereignty may be contrasted with separation of powers, which limits the legislature's scope often to general law-making, and judicial review, where laws passed by the legislature may be declared invalid in certain circumstances.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Parliamentary Sovereignty
Parliamentary sovereignty is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty, and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. It also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so it is not bound by written law or by precedent.
Parliamentary sovereignty may be contrasted with separation of powers, which limits the legislature's scope often to general law-making, and judicial review, where laws passed by the legislature may be declared invalid in certain circumstances.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 17 Nov 2015
- views: 2
How Judges Decide Cases: Inside the Judicial Decision-Making Process - Lawyers & Jury Trials (1990)
The judiciary (also known as the judicial system' or court system) is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. The ......
The judiciary (also known as the judicial system' or court system) is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. The ...
wn.com/How Judges Decide Cases Inside The Judicial Decision Making Process Lawyers Jury Trials (1990)
The judiciary (also known as the judicial system' or court system) is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. The ...
LAWS12061 02 2015 The Framework for Judicial Review
LAWS12061 02 2015 The Framework for Judicial Review. This presentation is part of a course on Administrative Law presented by Brett Eurell, CQUniversity Austral...
LAWS12061 02 2015 The Framework for Judicial Review. This presentation is part of a course on Administrative Law presented by Brett Eurell, CQUniversity Australia. www.cqu.edu.au/law
The full course may be viewed on iTunesU at the CQUniversity site. Visit CQU Law on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/CQU-Law.
wn.com/Laws12061 02 2015 The Framework For Judicial Review
LAWS12061 02 2015 The Framework for Judicial Review. This presentation is part of a course on Administrative Law presented by Brett Eurell, CQUniversity Australia. www.cqu.edu.au/law
The full course may be viewed on iTunesU at the CQUniversity site. Visit CQU Law on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/CQU-Law.
- published: 21 Jan 2015
- views: 4
Good Law; A Judicial Perspective - Lord Toulson
On Monday 30 June 2014, Lord Toulson gave an address entitled 'Good Law: A Judicial Perspective' at the Supreme Court, in front of an audience of government law...
On Monday 30 June 2014, Lord Toulson gave an address entitled 'Good Law: A Judicial Perspective' at the Supreme Court, in front of an audience of government lawyers and other invited guests.
In the lecture, Lord Toulson underlined the potential impact on the rule of law when legislation is not drafted clearly, and outlined a number of steps legislators and Parliamentary Counsel could take to assist the courts in interpreting and applying the law as Parliament intends. Lord Toulson acknowledged the progress made towards a comprehensive database of statute law and encouraged efforts to make available this valuable facility for the public. He also reviewed other tools used by Government in communicating the intention of legislation alongside the text of the Bill. The full text of the lecture will be available on the Supreme Court website.
wn.com/Good Law A Judicial Perspective Lord Toulson
On Monday 30 June 2014, Lord Toulson gave an address entitled 'Good Law: A Judicial Perspective' at the Supreme Court, in front of an audience of government lawyers and other invited guests.
In the lecture, Lord Toulson underlined the potential impact on the rule of law when legislation is not drafted clearly, and outlined a number of steps legislators and Parliamentary Counsel could take to assist the courts in interpreting and applying the law as Parliament intends. Lord Toulson acknowledged the progress made towards a comprehensive database of statute law and encouraged efforts to make available this valuable facility for the public. He also reviewed other tools used by Government in communicating the intention of legislation alongside the text of the Bill. The full text of the lecture will be available on the Supreme Court website.
- published: 01 Jul 2014
- views: 1049