- published: 01 Apr 2016
- views: 2177
Create your page here
-
remove the playlistBas Van Fraassen
-
remove the playlistBas Van Fraassen Interviews
- remove the playlistBas Van Fraassen
- remove the playlistBas Van Fraassen Interviews
back to playlist
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? Are there boundaries to science? Are there truths, real truths, beyond science?
Click here to watch more interviews on the scope and limits of science http://bit.ly/22W1FJW
Click here to watch more interviews with Bas van Fraassen http://bit.ly/1PKWZK8
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not easily dismissed even when the logical aporiai are exposed.
What Kant called the illusions of reason beckon here, but their false promises may be shown up if we subject the possibility of ‘objective’ scientific accounts of ourselves to a deeper logical scrutiny. Can we avoid the logical difficulties by trying instead to ‘naturalize’ and understand ourselves in the same way as we understand natural systems? There too logical paradoxes may return, and I will discuss the implications of Thomason’s paradox for the language of belief.
Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University
Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings. http://www.rotman.uwo.ca
Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo
Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
- published: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 1117
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit manifested itself in philosophy of science, with strong reactions against the dominant 'received view' of Logical Positivism. Scientific realism emerged to dispute ontology, Kuhn single-handedly turned our eyes back to history of science, and the semantic approach replaced the methodological framework for philosophers of science. The Logical Positivist revolution had just about reached age 50 at the time; today the semantic approach is about 50 years old as well. I will discuss its development, fortunes and misfortunes, suggest that a new, third revolution is due, and invite speculation about what it might be.
Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University
April 4, 2014
Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings: http://www.rotman.uwo.ca
Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo
Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
- published: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 3370
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three Steps Away From Naturalism
Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00
The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00
Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00
Université du Québec à Montréal
Département de philosophie
Salle W-5215
Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain
455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal
Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00
Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme
Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité
- published: 15 Oct 2012
- views: 145
Bas van Fraassen
Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University and the McCosh Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Princeton University, noted for his seminal contributions to philosophy of science.
-Video is targeted to blind users
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
image source in video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-5UUlneclU
- published: 22 Jan 2016
- views: 36
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, reason, ethics, and aesthetics, Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethicists Logicians Metaphysicians, Analytic Continental Pragmatism Eastern Islamic Platonic Scholastic, Ancient Medieval Modern Contemporary, Nicola Abbagnano, Peter Achinstein, H. B. Acton, Marilyn McCord Adams, Robert Merrihew Adams, Mortimer Adler
Theodor Adorno, Sediq Afghan (1958–)
Michel Aflaq (1910–1989)
Giorgio Agamben (1942–)
Hans Albert (1921–)
Rogers Albritton (1923–2002)
Virgil Aldrich (1903–1998)[b]
Gerda Alexander (1908–1994)
Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov, Robert Alexy, Diogenes Allen, William Alston, Louis Althusser, Alan Ross Anderson, C. Anthony Anderson, Pamela Sue Anderson, G. E. M. Anscombe, Karl-Otto Apel, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Hannah Arendt, David Malet Armstrong, Zaki al-Arsuzi, Raymond Aron, Pandurang Shastri Athavale, Robert Audi, John Langshaw Austin, Alfred Jules Ayer, Joxe Azurmendi, Kent Bach, Alain Badiou, Archie J. Bahm, Annette Baier, Kurt Baier, Albena Bakratcheva, Tom Baldwin, Étienne Balibar, Hassan al-Banna, Norman P. Barry, William Barrett, Roland Barthes, Jon Barwise, Jean Baudrillard, Monroe Beardsley, Jean Beaufret, Lewis White Beck, Gustav Bergmann, Marshall Berman, Isaiah Berlin, Alfred Bernhart, Andrew Bernstein, Harry Binswanger, Max Black, Maurice Blanchot (1907–2003)[d]
Allan Bloom (1930–1992)
Norberto Bobbio (1909–2004)[b][c][d]
Jozef Maria Bochenski (1902–1995)
Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906–1945)[c][d]
George Boolos (1940–1996)
Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002)[d]
Richard-Bevan Braithwaite (1900–1990)[b][c]
Richard B. Brandt (1910–1997)[a][b]
Michael Bratman (1945-)
Stephen E. Braude
Harry Brighouse
Berit Brogaard (1970-)
Stephen Bronner (1949-)
John Broome (1947-)
Pascal Bruckner (1948-)
Mario Bunge (1919-)
John Burnheim (1928-)
Panayot Butchvarov (1933-)
Judith Butler (1956-)
Charles Butterworth, Amílcar Cabral (1924–1973)[d]
Albert Camus (1913–1960)[a][b][c][d]
Georges Canguilhem (1904–1995)[a]
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1924–1991)[a]
David Castle (1967- )
Cornelius Castoriadis, Paola Cavalieri, Michel de Certeau, David Chalmers, Haridas Chaudhuri, Roderick Chisholm, Noam Chomsky, Alonzo Church, Frank Cioffi, L. Jonathan Cohen, Lucio Colletti, Frederick Copleston, Jack Copeland, William Lane Craig, Mary Daly, Donald Davidson, Simone de Beauvoir, Alain de Benoist, Alain de Botton, Bruno de Finetti, Paul de Man, Guy Debord, Gilles Deleuze, Bernard Delfgaauw,, Daniel Dennett, Jacques Derrida, Michael Dummett, Miroslaw Dzielski, William A. Earle, Umberto Eco, James M. Edie, Paul Edwards, Mircea Eliade, Jacques Ellul, Gareth Evans, Ignacio Ellacuria, Emil Fackenheim, Frantz Fanon, Austin Marsden Farrer, Herbert Feigl, Joel Feinberg, José Ferrater Mora, Paul Feyerabend, Hartry H. Field, Arthur Fine, Kit Fine, Antony Flew, Vilém Flusser, Michel Foucault, Bas van Fraassen, William K. Frankena, Oliver Shewell Franks Hans Frei, Northrop Frye, Lon L. Fuller, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Peter Geach, Ernest Gellner, Gerhard Gentzen, Edmund Gettier, Alan Gewirth, Rashid al-Ghannushi, Kurt Gödel, Lucien Goldmann, Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Nelson Goodman, Paul Goodman, Allan Gotthelf, George Grant, Herbert Paul Grice, Félix Guattari Gotthard Günther, Susan Haack, Jürgen Habermas, Manly Palmer Hall, Philip Hallie, Stuart Hampshire, Norwood Russell Hanson, Michael Hardt, R. M. Hare, Donna Haraway, H. L. A. Hart, David Bentley Hart, Sally Haslanger, John Hawthorne, Werner Heisenberg, Ágnes Heller, Erich Heller, Carl Gustav Hempel, Michel Henry, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Mary Hesse, Jaakko Hintikka, Sidney Hook, Robert Maynard Hutchins, Hsu Fu-kuan, Jean Hyppolite, Evald Vassilievich Ilyenkov, Peter van Inwagen, Frank Jackson, Fredric Jameson, Christopher Janaway, Erich Jantsch, Richard C. Jeffrey, Hans Jonas
- published: 15 Jun 2013
- views: 1140
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three Steps Away From Naturalism
Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00
The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00
Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00
Université du Québec à Montréal
Département de philosophie
Salle W-5215
Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain
455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal
Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00
Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme
Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité
- published: 17 Oct 2012
- views: 1017
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil
Vorlesung "Wissenschaftstheorie" von Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt, Institut für Philosophie, Leibniz Universität Hannover
Ganze Vorlesung als Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4O7bFNxwUHpxnd77NrkTMeJV67vd1n_p
Kapitel 6: Antirealismus
Teil 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus
Empirische Adäquatheit. Agnostische Haltung
- published: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 217
Florence (Italy) 11-21-2009, Sala del Gonfalone della Regione Toscana
- published: 24 Nov 2009
- views: 958
Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born in Goes, the Netherlands on 5 April 1941) is a Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University, teaching courses in the philosophy of science, philosophical logic and the role of models in scientific practice. He previously taught at Yale University, the University of Southern California (USC), the University of Toronto and Princeton University. He coined the term "constructive empiricism" in his 1980 book The Scientific Image. Van Fraassen earned his B.A. (1963) from the University of Alberta and his M.A. (1964) and Ph.D. (1966, under the direction of Adolf Grünbaum) from the University of Pittsburgh.
A philosopher of science, van Fraassen's 1989 book Laws and Symmetry attempted to lay the ground-work for explaining physical phenomena without using the assumption that such phenomena are caused by rules or laws which can be said to cause or govern their behavior. Focusing on the problem of underdetermination, he argued for the possibility that theories could have empirical equivalence but differ in their ontological commitments. He rejects the notion that the aim of science is to produce an account of the physical world that is literally true, but rather that its aim is to produce theories that are empirically adequate. Van Fraassen has also studied the philosophy of quantum mechanics, philosophical logic, and epistemology.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bas_van_Fraassen
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
11:01Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? Are there boundaries to science? Are there truths, real truths, beyond science? Click here to watch more interviews on the scope and limits of science http://bit.ly/22W1FJW Click here to watch more interviews with Bas van Fraassen http://bit.ly/1PKWZK8 Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com -
86:06Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of ViewBas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not easily dismissed even when the logical aporiai are exposed. What Kant called the illusions of reason beckon here, but their false promises may be shown up if we subject the possibility of ‘objective’ scientific accounts of ourselves to a deeper logical scrutiny. Can we avoid the logical difficulties by trying instead to ‘naturalize’ and understand ourselves in the same way as we understand natural systems? There too logical paradoxes may return, and I will discuss the implications of Thomason’s paradox for the language of belief. Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings. http://www.rotman.uwo.ca Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy -
89:19Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 YearsBas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit manifested itself in philosophy of science, with strong reactions against the dominant 'received view' of Logical Positivism. Scientific realism emerged to dispute ontology, Kuhn single-handedly turned our eyes back to history of science, and the semantic approach replaced the methodological framework for philosophers of science. The Logical Positivist revolution had just about reached age 50 at the time; today the semantic approach is about 50 years old as well. I will discuss its development, fortunes and misfortunes, suggest that a new, third revolution is due, and invite speculation about what it might be. Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University April 4, 2014 Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings: http://www.rotman.uwo.ca Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy -
39:00Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmvJournées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012 DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012 Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University Three Steps Away From Naturalism Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00 The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00 Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00 Université du Québec à Montréal Département de philosophie Salle W-5215 Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain 455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00 Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité -
7:05Bas van Fraassen
Bas van FraassenBas van Fraassen
Bas van Fraassen Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University and the McCosh Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Princeton University, noted for his seminal contributions to philosophy of science. -Video is targeted to blind users Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA image source in video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-5UUlneclU -
9:39Are You Your Brain?
Are You Your Brain?Are You Your Brain?
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, reason, ethics, and aesthetics, Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethicists Logicians Metaphysicians, Analytic Continental Pragmatism Eastern Islamic Platonic Scholastic, Ancient Medieval Modern Contemporary, Nicola Abbagnano, Peter Achinstein, H. B. Acton, Marilyn McCord Adams, Robert Merrihew Adams, Mortimer Adler Theodor Adorno, Sediq Afghan (1958–) Michel Aflaq (1910–1989) Giorgio Agamben (1942–) Hans Albert (1921–) Rogers Albritton (1923–2002) Virgil Aldrich (1903–1998)[b] Gerda Alexander (1908–1994) Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov, Robert Alexy, Diogenes Allen, William Alston, Louis Althusser, Alan Ross Anderson, C. Anthony Anderson, Pamela Sue Anderson, G. E. M. Anscombe, Karl-Otto Apel, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Hannah Arendt, David Malet Armstrong, Zaki al-Arsuzi, Raymond Aron, Pandurang Shastri Athavale, Robert Audi, John Langshaw Austin, Alfred Jules Ayer, Joxe Azurmendi, Kent Bach, Alain Badiou, Archie J. Bahm, Annette Baier, Kurt Baier, Albena Bakratcheva, Tom Baldwin, Étienne Balibar, Hassan al-Banna, Norman P. Barry, William Barrett, Roland Barthes, Jon Barwise, Jean Baudrillard, Monroe Beardsley, Jean Beaufret, Lewis White Beck, Gustav Bergmann, Marshall Berman, Isaiah Berlin, Alfred Bernhart, Andrew Bernstein, Harry Binswanger, Max Black, Maurice Blanchot (1907–2003)[d] Allan Bloom (1930–1992) Norberto Bobbio (1909–2004)[b][c][d] Jozef Maria Bochenski (1902–1995) Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906–1945)[c][d] George Boolos (1940–1996) Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002)[d] Richard-Bevan Braithwaite (1900–1990)[b][c] Richard B. Brandt (1910–1997)[a][b] Michael Bratman (1945-) Stephen E. Braude Harry Brighouse Berit Brogaard (1970-) Stephen Bronner (1949-) John Broome (1947-) Pascal Bruckner (1948-) Mario Bunge (1919-) John Burnheim (1928-) Panayot Butchvarov (1933-) Judith Butler (1956-) Charles Butterworth, Amílcar Cabral (1924–1973)[d] Albert Camus (1913–1960)[a][b][c][d] Georges Canguilhem (1904–1995)[a] Hector-Neri Castañeda (1924–1991)[a] David Castle (1967- ) Cornelius Castoriadis, Paola Cavalieri, Michel de Certeau, David Chalmers, Haridas Chaudhuri, Roderick Chisholm, Noam Chomsky, Alonzo Church, Frank Cioffi, L. Jonathan Cohen, Lucio Colletti, Frederick Copleston, Jack Copeland, William Lane Craig, Mary Daly, Donald Davidson, Simone de Beauvoir, Alain de Benoist, Alain de Botton, Bruno de Finetti, Paul de Man, Guy Debord, Gilles Deleuze, Bernard Delfgaauw,, Daniel Dennett, Jacques Derrida, Michael Dummett, Miroslaw Dzielski, William A. Earle, Umberto Eco, James M. Edie, Paul Edwards, Mircea Eliade, Jacques Ellul, Gareth Evans, Ignacio Ellacuria, Emil Fackenheim, Frantz Fanon, Austin Marsden Farrer, Herbert Feigl, Joel Feinberg, José Ferrater Mora, Paul Feyerabend, Hartry H. Field, Arthur Fine, Kit Fine, Antony Flew, Vilém Flusser, Michel Foucault, Bas van Fraassen, William K. Frankena, Oliver Shewell Franks Hans Frei, Northrop Frye, Lon L. Fuller, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Peter Geach, Ernest Gellner, Gerhard Gentzen, Edmund Gettier, Alan Gewirth, Rashid al-Ghannushi, Kurt Gödel, Lucien Goldmann, Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Nelson Goodman, Paul Goodman, Allan Gotthelf, George Grant, Herbert Paul Grice, Félix Guattari Gotthard Günther, Susan Haack, Jürgen Habermas, Manly Palmer Hall, Philip Hallie, Stuart Hampshire, Norwood Russell Hanson, Michael Hardt, R. M. Hare, Donna Haraway, H. L. A. Hart, David Bentley Hart, Sally Haslanger, John Hawthorne, Werner Heisenberg, Ágnes Heller, Erich Heller, Carl Gustav Hempel, Michel Henry, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Mary Hesse, Jaakko Hintikka, Sidney Hook, Robert Maynard Hutchins, Hsu Fu-kuan, Jean Hyppolite, Evald Vassilievich Ilyenkov, Peter van Inwagen, Frank Jackson, Fredric Jameson, Christopher Janaway, Erich Jantsch, Richard C. Jeffrey, Hans Jonas -
46:34Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmvJournée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012 DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012 Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University Three Steps Away From Naturalism Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00 The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00 Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00 Université du Québec à Montréal Département de philosophie Salle W-5215 Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain 455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00 Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité -
7:277 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
-
19:01Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten WilholtWissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil Vorlesung "Wissenschaftstheorie" von Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt, Institut für Philosophie, Leibniz Universität Hannover Ganze Vorlesung als Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4O7bFNxwUHpxnd77NrkTMeJV67vd1n_p Kapitel 6: Antirealismus Teil 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus Empirische Adäquatheit. Agnostische Haltung -
9:45Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
Florence (Italy) 11-21-2009, Sala del Gonfalone della Regione Toscana
- American philosophy
- Analytic philosophy
- Anti-realism
- Bachelor of Arts
- Bas van Fraassen
- Doctor of Philosophy
- Epistemology
- Free logic
- Goes
- Kira Institute
- Lakatos Award
- Many-valued logic
- Netherlands
- Non-referring names
- Ontology
- Paul M. Churchland
- Phenomenon
- Philosophical logic
- Philosophy
- Princeton University
- Scientific modelling
- Supervaluation
- Truth-value
- Underdetermination
- W.V.O. Quine
- Western Philosophy
- Wikipedia Persondata
- Yale University
-
Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? Are there boundaries to science? Are there truths, real truths, beyond science? Click here to watch more interviews on the scope and limits of science http://bit.ly/22W1FJW Click here to watch more interviews with Bas van Fraassen http://bit.ly/1PKWZK8 Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com -
Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not easily dismissed even when the logical aporiai are exposed. What Kant called the illusions of reason beckon here, but their false promises may be shown up if we subject the possibility of ‘objective’ scientific accounts of ourselves to a deeper logical scrutiny. Can we avoid the logical difficulties by trying instead to ‘naturalize’ and understand ourselves in the same way as we understand natural systems? There too logical paradoxes may return, and I will discuss the implications of Thomason’s paradox for the language of belief. Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and open... -
Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit manifested itself in philosophy of science, with strong reactions against the dominant 'received view' of Logical Positivism. Scientific realism emerged to dispute ontology, Kuhn single-handedly turned our eyes back to history of science, and the semantic approach replaced the methodological framework for philosophers of science. The Logical Positivist revolution had just about reached age 50 at the time; today the semantic approach is about 50 years old as well. I will discuss its development, fortunes and misfortunes, suggest that a new, third revolution is due, and invite speculation about what it might be. Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University April 4, 2014 Vis... -
Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012 DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012 Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University Three Steps Away From Naturalism Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00 The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00 Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00 Université du Québec à Montréal Département de philosophie Salle W-5215 Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain 455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00 Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité -
Bas van Fraassen
Bas van Fraassen Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University and the McCosh Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Princeton University, noted for his seminal contributions to philosophy of science. -Video is targeted to blind users Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA image source in video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-5UUlneclU -
Are You Your Brain?
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, reason, ethics, and aesthetics, Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethicists Logicians Metaphysicians, Analytic Continental Pragmatism Eastern Islamic Platonic Scholastic, Ancient Medieval Modern Contemporary, Nicola Abbagnano, Peter Achinstein, H. B. Acton, Marilyn McCord Adams, Robert Merrihew Adams, Mortimer Adler Theodor Adorno, Sediq Afghan (1958–) Michel Aflaq (1910–1989) Giorgio Agamben (1942–) Hans Albert (1921–) Rogers Albritton (1923–2002) Virgil Aldrich (1903–1998)[b] Gerda Alexander (1908–1994) Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov, Robert Alexy, Diogenes Allen, William Alston, Louis Althusser, Alan Ross Anderson, C. Anthony Anderson, Pamela Sue Anderson, G. E. M... -
Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012 DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012 Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University Three Steps Away From Naturalism Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00 The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00 Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00 Université du Québec à Montréal Département de philosophie Salle W-5215 Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain 455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00 Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité -
7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
-
Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil Vorlesung "Wissenschaftstheorie" von Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt, Institut für Philosophie, Leibniz Universität Hannover Ganze Vorlesung als Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4O7bFNxwUHpxnd77NrkTMeJV67vd1n_p Kapitel 6: Antirealismus Teil 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus Empirische Adäquatheit. Agnostische Haltung -
Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
Florence (Italy) 11-21-2009, Sala del Gonfalone della Regione Toscana
Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:01
- Updated: 01 Apr 2016
- views: 2177
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? Are there boundaries to science? Are there truths, real truths, beyond ...
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? Are there boundaries to science? Are there truths, real truths, beyond science?
Click here to watch more interviews on the scope and limits of science http://bit.ly/22W1FJW
Click here to watch more interviews with Bas van Fraassen http://bit.ly/1PKWZK8
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
wn.com/Bas Van Fraassen What Are The Scope And Limits Of Science
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? Are there boundaries to science? Are there truths, real truths, beyond science?
Click here to watch more interviews on the scope and limits of science http://bit.ly/22W1FJW
Click here to watch more interviews with Bas van Fraassen http://bit.ly/1PKWZK8
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
- published: 01 Apr 2016
- views: 2177
Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 86:06
- Updated: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 1117
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not easily dismissed even when the logical aporiai are exposed.
What Kant ca...
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not easily dismissed even when the logical aporiai are exposed.
What Kant called the illusions of reason beckon here, but their false promises may be shown up if we subject the possibility of ‘objective’ scientific accounts of ourselves to a deeper logical scrutiny. Can we avoid the logical difficulties by trying instead to ‘naturalize’ and understand ourselves in the same way as we understand natural systems? There too logical paradoxes may return, and I will discuss the implications of Thomason’s paradox for the language of belief.
Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University
Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings. http://www.rotman.uwo.ca
Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo
Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
wn.com/Bas Van Fraassen The Self, From A Logical Point Of View
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not easily dismissed even when the logical aporiai are exposed.
What Kant called the illusions of reason beckon here, but their false promises may be shown up if we subject the possibility of ‘objective’ scientific accounts of ourselves to a deeper logical scrutiny. Can we avoid the logical difficulties by trying instead to ‘naturalize’ and understand ourselves in the same way as we understand natural systems? There too logical paradoxes may return, and I will discuss the implications of Thomason’s paradox for the language of belief.
Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University
Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings. http://www.rotman.uwo.ca
Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo
Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
- published: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 1117
Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 89:19
- Updated: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 3370
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit manifested itself in philosophy of science, with strong reactions again...
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit manifested itself in philosophy of science, with strong reactions against the dominant 'received view' of Logical Positivism. Scientific realism emerged to dispute ontology, Kuhn single-handedly turned our eyes back to history of science, and the semantic approach replaced the methodological framework for philosophers of science. The Logical Positivist revolution had just about reached age 50 at the time; today the semantic approach is about 50 years old as well. I will discuss its development, fortunes and misfortunes, suggest that a new, third revolution is due, and invite speculation about what it might be.
Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University
April 4, 2014
Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings: http://www.rotman.uwo.ca
Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo
Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
wn.com/Bas Van Fraassen The Semantic Approach To Science, After 50 Years
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit manifested itself in philosophy of science, with strong reactions against the dominant 'received view' of Logical Positivism. Scientific realism emerged to dispute ontology, Kuhn single-handedly turned our eyes back to history of science, and the semantic approach replaced the methodological framework for philosophers of science. The Logical Positivist revolution had just about reached age 50 at the time; today the semantic approach is about 50 years old as well. I will discuss its development, fortunes and misfortunes, suggest that a new, third revolution is due, and invite speculation about what it might be.
Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University and San Francisco State University
April 4, 2014
Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions and openings: http://www.rotman.uwo.ca
Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rotmanphilo
Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RotmanInstitute
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
- published: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 3370
Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 39:00
- Updated: 15 Oct 2012
- views: 145
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three ...
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three Steps Away From Naturalism
Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00
The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00
Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00
Université du Québec à Montréal
Département de philosophie
Salle W-5215
Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain
455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal
Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00
Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme
Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité
wn.com/Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence Serge Robert Vs Bas Van Fraassen (Deuxième Partie).Wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three Steps Away From Naturalism
Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00
The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00
Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00
Université du Québec à Montréal
Département de philosophie
Salle W-5215
Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain
455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal
Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00
Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme
Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité
- published: 15 Oct 2012
- views: 145
Bas van Fraassen
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:05
- Updated: 22 Jan 2016
- views: 36
Bas van Fraassen
Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University and the McCosh...
Bas van Fraassen
Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University and the McCosh Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Princeton University, noted for his seminal contributions to philosophy of science.
-Video is targeted to blind users
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
image source in video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-5UUlneclU
wn.com/Bas Van Fraassen
Bas van Fraassen
Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco State University and the McCosh Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Princeton University, noted for his seminal contributions to philosophy of science.
-Video is targeted to blind users
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
image source in video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-5UUlneclU
- published: 22 Jan 2016
- views: 36
Are You Your Brain?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 9:39
- Updated: 15 Jun 2013
- views: 1140
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, reason, ethics, and aesthetics, Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethic...
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, reason, ethics, and aesthetics, Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethicists Logicians Metaphysicians, Analytic Continental Pragmatism Eastern Islamic Platonic Scholastic, Ancient Medieval Modern Contemporary, Nicola Abbagnano, Peter Achinstein, H. B. Acton, Marilyn McCord Adams, Robert Merrihew Adams, Mortimer Adler
Theodor Adorno, Sediq Afghan (1958–)
Michel Aflaq (1910–1989)
Giorgio Agamben (1942–)
Hans Albert (1921–)
Rogers Albritton (1923–2002)
Virgil Aldrich (1903–1998)[b]
Gerda Alexander (1908–1994)
Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov, Robert Alexy, Diogenes Allen, William Alston, Louis Althusser, Alan Ross Anderson, C. Anthony Anderson, Pamela Sue Anderson, G. E. M. Anscombe, Karl-Otto Apel, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Hannah Arendt, David Malet Armstrong, Zaki al-Arsuzi, Raymond Aron, Pandurang Shastri Athavale, Robert Audi, John Langshaw Austin, Alfred Jules Ayer, Joxe Azurmendi, Kent Bach, Alain Badiou, Archie J. Bahm, Annette Baier, Kurt Baier, Albena Bakratcheva, Tom Baldwin, Étienne Balibar, Hassan al-Banna, Norman P. Barry, William Barrett, Roland Barthes, Jon Barwise, Jean Baudrillard, Monroe Beardsley, Jean Beaufret, Lewis White Beck, Gustav Bergmann, Marshall Berman, Isaiah Berlin, Alfred Bernhart, Andrew Bernstein, Harry Binswanger, Max Black, Maurice Blanchot (1907–2003)[d]
Allan Bloom (1930–1992)
Norberto Bobbio (1909–2004)[b][c][d]
Jozef Maria Bochenski (1902–1995)
Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906–1945)[c][d]
George Boolos (1940–1996)
Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002)[d]
Richard-Bevan Braithwaite (1900–1990)[b][c]
Richard B. Brandt (1910–1997)[a][b]
Michael Bratman (1945-)
Stephen E. Braude
Harry Brighouse
Berit Brogaard (1970-)
Stephen Bronner (1949-)
John Broome (1947-)
Pascal Bruckner (1948-)
Mario Bunge (1919-)
John Burnheim (1928-)
Panayot Butchvarov (1933-)
Judith Butler (1956-)
Charles Butterworth, Amílcar Cabral (1924–1973)[d]
Albert Camus (1913–1960)[a][b][c][d]
Georges Canguilhem (1904–1995)[a]
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1924–1991)[a]
David Castle (1967- )
Cornelius Castoriadis, Paola Cavalieri, Michel de Certeau, David Chalmers, Haridas Chaudhuri, Roderick Chisholm, Noam Chomsky, Alonzo Church, Frank Cioffi, L. Jonathan Cohen, Lucio Colletti, Frederick Copleston, Jack Copeland, William Lane Craig, Mary Daly, Donald Davidson, Simone de Beauvoir, Alain de Benoist, Alain de Botton, Bruno de Finetti, Paul de Man, Guy Debord, Gilles Deleuze, Bernard Delfgaauw,, Daniel Dennett, Jacques Derrida, Michael Dummett, Miroslaw Dzielski, William A. Earle, Umberto Eco, James M. Edie, Paul Edwards, Mircea Eliade, Jacques Ellul, Gareth Evans, Ignacio Ellacuria, Emil Fackenheim, Frantz Fanon, Austin Marsden Farrer, Herbert Feigl, Joel Feinberg, José Ferrater Mora, Paul Feyerabend, Hartry H. Field, Arthur Fine, Kit Fine, Antony Flew, Vilém Flusser, Michel Foucault, Bas van Fraassen, William K. Frankena, Oliver Shewell Franks Hans Frei, Northrop Frye, Lon L. Fuller, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Peter Geach, Ernest Gellner, Gerhard Gentzen, Edmund Gettier, Alan Gewirth, Rashid al-Ghannushi, Kurt Gödel, Lucien Goldmann, Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Nelson Goodman, Paul Goodman, Allan Gotthelf, George Grant, Herbert Paul Grice, Félix Guattari Gotthard Günther, Susan Haack, Jürgen Habermas, Manly Palmer Hall, Philip Hallie, Stuart Hampshire, Norwood Russell Hanson, Michael Hardt, R. M. Hare, Donna Haraway, H. L. A. Hart, David Bentley Hart, Sally Haslanger, John Hawthorne, Werner Heisenberg, Ágnes Heller, Erich Heller, Carl Gustav Hempel, Michel Henry, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Mary Hesse, Jaakko Hintikka, Sidney Hook, Robert Maynard Hutchins, Hsu Fu-kuan, Jean Hyppolite, Evald Vassilievich Ilyenkov, Peter van Inwagen, Frank Jackson, Fredric Jameson, Christopher Janaway, Erich Jantsch, Richard C. Jeffrey, Hans Jonas
wn.com/Are You Your Brain
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, reason, ethics, and aesthetics, Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethicists Logicians Metaphysicians, Analytic Continental Pragmatism Eastern Islamic Platonic Scholastic, Ancient Medieval Modern Contemporary, Nicola Abbagnano, Peter Achinstein, H. B. Acton, Marilyn McCord Adams, Robert Merrihew Adams, Mortimer Adler
Theodor Adorno, Sediq Afghan (1958–)
Michel Aflaq (1910–1989)
Giorgio Agamben (1942–)
Hans Albert (1921–)
Rogers Albritton (1923–2002)
Virgil Aldrich (1903–1998)[b]
Gerda Alexander (1908–1994)
Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov, Robert Alexy, Diogenes Allen, William Alston, Louis Althusser, Alan Ross Anderson, C. Anthony Anderson, Pamela Sue Anderson, G. E. M. Anscombe, Karl-Otto Apel, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Hannah Arendt, David Malet Armstrong, Zaki al-Arsuzi, Raymond Aron, Pandurang Shastri Athavale, Robert Audi, John Langshaw Austin, Alfred Jules Ayer, Joxe Azurmendi, Kent Bach, Alain Badiou, Archie J. Bahm, Annette Baier, Kurt Baier, Albena Bakratcheva, Tom Baldwin, Étienne Balibar, Hassan al-Banna, Norman P. Barry, William Barrett, Roland Barthes, Jon Barwise, Jean Baudrillard, Monroe Beardsley, Jean Beaufret, Lewis White Beck, Gustav Bergmann, Marshall Berman, Isaiah Berlin, Alfred Bernhart, Andrew Bernstein, Harry Binswanger, Max Black, Maurice Blanchot (1907–2003)[d]
Allan Bloom (1930–1992)
Norberto Bobbio (1909–2004)[b][c][d]
Jozef Maria Bochenski (1902–1995)
Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906–1945)[c][d]
George Boolos (1940–1996)
Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002)[d]
Richard-Bevan Braithwaite (1900–1990)[b][c]
Richard B. Brandt (1910–1997)[a][b]
Michael Bratman (1945-)
Stephen E. Braude
Harry Brighouse
Berit Brogaard (1970-)
Stephen Bronner (1949-)
John Broome (1947-)
Pascal Bruckner (1948-)
Mario Bunge (1919-)
John Burnheim (1928-)
Panayot Butchvarov (1933-)
Judith Butler (1956-)
Charles Butterworth, Amílcar Cabral (1924–1973)[d]
Albert Camus (1913–1960)[a][b][c][d]
Georges Canguilhem (1904–1995)[a]
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1924–1991)[a]
David Castle (1967- )
Cornelius Castoriadis, Paola Cavalieri, Michel de Certeau, David Chalmers, Haridas Chaudhuri, Roderick Chisholm, Noam Chomsky, Alonzo Church, Frank Cioffi, L. Jonathan Cohen, Lucio Colletti, Frederick Copleston, Jack Copeland, William Lane Craig, Mary Daly, Donald Davidson, Simone de Beauvoir, Alain de Benoist, Alain de Botton, Bruno de Finetti, Paul de Man, Guy Debord, Gilles Deleuze, Bernard Delfgaauw,, Daniel Dennett, Jacques Derrida, Michael Dummett, Miroslaw Dzielski, William A. Earle, Umberto Eco, James M. Edie, Paul Edwards, Mircea Eliade, Jacques Ellul, Gareth Evans, Ignacio Ellacuria, Emil Fackenheim, Frantz Fanon, Austin Marsden Farrer, Herbert Feigl, Joel Feinberg, José Ferrater Mora, Paul Feyerabend, Hartry H. Field, Arthur Fine, Kit Fine, Antony Flew, Vilém Flusser, Michel Foucault, Bas van Fraassen, William K. Frankena, Oliver Shewell Franks Hans Frei, Northrop Frye, Lon L. Fuller, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Peter Geach, Ernest Gellner, Gerhard Gentzen, Edmund Gettier, Alan Gewirth, Rashid al-Ghannushi, Kurt Gödel, Lucien Goldmann, Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Nelson Goodman, Paul Goodman, Allan Gotthelf, George Grant, Herbert Paul Grice, Félix Guattari Gotthard Günther, Susan Haack, Jürgen Habermas, Manly Palmer Hall, Philip Hallie, Stuart Hampshire, Norwood Russell Hanson, Michael Hardt, R. M. Hare, Donna Haraway, H. L. A. Hart, David Bentley Hart, Sally Haslanger, John Hawthorne, Werner Heisenberg, Ágnes Heller, Erich Heller, Carl Gustav Hempel, Michel Henry, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Mary Hesse, Jaakko Hintikka, Sidney Hook, Robert Maynard Hutchins, Hsu Fu-kuan, Jean Hyppolite, Evald Vassilievich Ilyenkov, Peter van Inwagen, Frank Jackson, Fredric Jameson, Christopher Janaway, Erich Jantsch, Richard C. Jeffrey, Hans Jonas
- published: 15 Jun 2013
- views: 1140
Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 46:34
- Updated: 17 Oct 2012
- views: 1017
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three ...
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three Steps Away From Naturalism
Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00
The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00
Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00
Université du Québec à Montréal
Département de philosophie
Salle W-5215
Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain
455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal
Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00
Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme
Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité
wn.com/Journée Hughes Leblanc Bas C. Van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, Via Possible Statistics (3E Partie).Wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco State University et Professeur retraité de Princeton University
Three Steps Away From Naturalism
Against Naturalism in Epistemology, jeudi le 5 avril à 16h00
The Self From a Logical Point of View, vendredi le 6 avril à 16h00
Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics, samedi le 7 avril à 11h00
Université du Québec à Montréal
Département de philosophie
Salle W-5215
Pavillon Thérèse-Casgrain
455, boulevard René-Lévesque est, Montréal
Commentateurs : samedi le 7 avril de 9h30 à 11h00
Yvon Gauthier, Université de Montréal, Naturalisme, structuralisme, constructivisme
Serge Robert, UQAM, Naturalisme et normativité
- published: 17 Oct 2012
- views: 1017
7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:27
- Updated: 12 Mar 2013
- views: 2242
- published: 12 Mar 2013
- views: 2242
Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 19:01
- Updated: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 217
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil
Vorlesung "Wissenschaftstheorie" von Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt, Institut für Philosophie,...
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil
Vorlesung "Wissenschaftstheorie" von Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt, Institut für Philosophie, Leibniz Universität Hannover
Ganze Vorlesung als Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4O7bFNxwUHpxnd77NrkTMeJV67vd1n_p
Kapitel 6: Antirealismus
Teil 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus
Empirische Adäquatheit. Agnostische Haltung
wn.com/Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6 Bas Van Fraassen Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil
Vorlesung "Wissenschaftstheorie" von Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt, Institut für Philosophie, Leibniz Universität Hannover
Ganze Vorlesung als Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4O7bFNxwUHpxnd77NrkTMeJV67vd1n_p
Kapitel 6: Antirealismus
Teil 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus
Empirische Adäquatheit. Agnostische Haltung
- published: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 217
Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 9:45
- Updated: 24 Nov 2009
- views: 958
Florence (Italy) 11-21-2009, Sala del Gonfalone della Regione Toscana
- published: 24 Nov 2009
- views: 958
-
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski on 10 Science and Religion Myths - Part 1 - trinities 133
http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1/ Is “Science” at war with “Religion”? Philosopher of science Dr. Jeffrey Koperski says that this is myth and not reality. In this episode we discuss five popular myths about science and religion, myths which stand in the way of people see both for what they have been and now are. The Big Bang has taken the place of God – it shows us where the cosmos came from. As long as there’s been Science, there’s been a war between Science and Religion. Galileo was clearly a martyr in the Science and Religion wars. Religion is based on Faith, whereas Science is based solely on empirical observation. Science is supremely open-minded, willing to drop all traditional assumptions upon the receipt of new data. Along... -
Kitcher Scientific Realism
Kitcher's criticisms of van Fraassen's antirealism -
Peter van Inwagen - How Does Metaphysics Reveal Reality?
Some think metaphysics is ancient nonsense; others that it's the bizarre occult. How does modern metaphysics contribute to our understanding of the world? Click here to watch more interviews on metaphysics and reveal reality http://bit.ly/1nIu6Ze Click here to watch more interviews with Peter van Inwagen http://bit.ly/1Sy47ih Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com -
Hilary Putnam on Philosophy of Science & Epistemology
Bryan Magee and Hilary Putnam discuss the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mathematics. An introductory overview is given of some of the conceptual issues which arise regarding knowledge and science including its nature, methodology, foundations, as well as objectivity, the fact-value dichotomy, the nature of truth, inductive logic, reductionism, materialism, etc. Hilary Putnam was an American philosopher, mathematician, & computer scientist who was a central figure in analytic philosophy from the 1960s, especially in philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of mathematics, & philosophy of science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilary_Putnam This interview is from a 1978 BBC program. Subtitles are available. -
Roger Penrose - What does Quantum Theory Mean?
Click here to see more video interviews on what quantum theory means http://bit.ly/1gk3pqa Click here for more interviews from Roger Penrose http://bit.ly/19Tyygc To buy Closer To Truth episodes click here http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS For more video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski on 10 Science and Religion Myths - Part 1 - trinities 133
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 50:59
- Updated: 04 Apr 2016
- views: 197
http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1/ Is “Science” at war with “Religion”? Philosopher of science Dr. Jef...
http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1/ Is “Science” at war with “Religion”? Philosopher of science Dr. Jeffrey Koperski says that this is myth and not reality. In this episode we discuss five popular myths about science and religion, myths which stand in the way of people see both for what they have been and now are.
The Big Bang has taken the place of God – it shows us where the cosmos came from.
As long as there’s been Science, there’s been a war between Science and Religion.
Galileo was clearly a martyr in the Science and Religion wars.
Religion is based on Faith, whereas Science is based solely on empirical observation.
Science is supremely open-minded, willing to drop all traditional assumptions upon the receipt of new data.
Along the way Dr. Koperski mentions additional, lesser myths, such as that Columbus discovered that the earth was not flat.
"There's more to religion than faith... more to science than observation..." - Dr. Jeffrey Koperski
Links for this episode @ http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1/
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski’s home page
The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of Science (kindle)
Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing (kindle), NYT review by philosopher Dr. David Albert
Paul Shestople, “Big Bang Cosmology Primer“
Issac Newton, Principia Mathematica
Anjan Chakravartty, “Scientific Realism“
Bradley Monton and Chad Mohler on Bas van Fraassen’s “constructive empiricism”
phlogiston, caloric
Galileo, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World SystemsGalileo_facing_the_Roman_Inquisition
Ronald Numbers, Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion
Historian of science John Hedley Brooke
Alexander Bird on philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn
Weekly podcast exploring views about the Trinity, and more generally about God and Jesus in Christian theology and philosophy. Debates, interviews, and historical and contemporary perspectives. Hosted by philosopher of religion / analytic theologian Dr. Dale Tuggy.
Today's thinking music has been “Malachite” by Andy G. Cohen, Released under a Creative Commons Attribution International License. https://andyg.co/hen/songs/malachite.
http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Andy_G_Cohen/Through_The_Lens/Andy_G_Cohen_-_Malachite
http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Andy_G_Cohen/
wn.com/Dr. Jeffrey Koperski On 10 Science And Religion Myths Part 1 Trinities 133
http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1/ Is “Science” at war with “Religion”? Philosopher of science Dr. Jeffrey Koperski says that this is myth and not reality. In this episode we discuss five popular myths about science and religion, myths which stand in the way of people see both for what they have been and now are.
The Big Bang has taken the place of God – it shows us where the cosmos came from.
As long as there’s been Science, there’s been a war between Science and Religion.
Galileo was clearly a martyr in the Science and Religion wars.
Religion is based on Faith, whereas Science is based solely on empirical observation.
Science is supremely open-minded, willing to drop all traditional assumptions upon the receipt of new data.
Along the way Dr. Koperski mentions additional, lesser myths, such as that Columbus discovered that the earth was not flat.
"There's more to religion than faith... more to science than observation..." - Dr. Jeffrey Koperski
Links for this episode @ http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1/
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski’s home page
The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of Science (kindle)
Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing (kindle), NYT review by philosopher Dr. David Albert
Paul Shestople, “Big Bang Cosmology Primer“
Issac Newton, Principia Mathematica
Anjan Chakravartty, “Scientific Realism“
Bradley Monton and Chad Mohler on Bas van Fraassen’s “constructive empiricism”
phlogiston, caloric
Galileo, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World SystemsGalileo_facing_the_Roman_Inquisition
Ronald Numbers, Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion
Historian of science John Hedley Brooke
Alexander Bird on philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn
Weekly podcast exploring views about the Trinity, and more generally about God and Jesus in Christian theology and philosophy. Debates, interviews, and historical and contemporary perspectives. Hosted by philosopher of religion / analytic theologian Dr. Dale Tuggy.
Today's thinking music has been “Malachite” by Andy G. Cohen, Released under a Creative Commons Attribution International License. https://andyg.co/hen/songs/malachite.
http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Andy_G_Cohen/Through_The_Lens/Andy_G_Cohen_-_Malachite
http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Andy_G_Cohen/
- published: 04 Apr 2016
- views: 197
Kitcher Scientific Realism
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:35
- Updated: 24 Feb 2014
- views: 444
Kitcher's criticisms of van Fraassen's antirealism
Kitcher's criticisms of van Fraassen's antirealism
wn.com/Kitcher Scientific Realism
Kitcher's criticisms of van Fraassen's antirealism
- published: 24 Feb 2014
- views: 444
Peter van Inwagen - How Does Metaphysics Reveal Reality?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:08
- Updated: 01 Feb 2016
- views: 2182
Some think metaphysics is ancient nonsense; others that it's the bizarre occult. How does modern metaphysics contribute to our understanding of the world?
Clic...
Some think metaphysics is ancient nonsense; others that it's the bizarre occult. How does modern metaphysics contribute to our understanding of the world?
Click here to watch more interviews on metaphysics and reveal reality http://bit.ly/1nIu6Ze
Click here to watch more interviews with Peter van Inwagen http://bit.ly/1Sy47ih
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
wn.com/Peter Van Inwagen How Does Metaphysics Reveal Reality
Some think metaphysics is ancient nonsense; others that it's the bizarre occult. How does modern metaphysics contribute to our understanding of the world?
Click here to watch more interviews on metaphysics and reveal reality http://bit.ly/1nIu6Ze
Click here to watch more interviews with Peter van Inwagen http://bit.ly/1Sy47ih
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
- published: 01 Feb 2016
- views: 2182
Hilary Putnam on Philosophy of Science & Epistemology
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 43:57
- Updated: 09 Nov 2015
- views: 4345
Bryan Magee and Hilary Putnam discuss the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mathematics. An introductory overview is given of some of the conceptual i...
Bryan Magee and Hilary Putnam discuss the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mathematics. An introductory overview is given of some of the conceptual issues which arise regarding knowledge and science including its nature, methodology, foundations, as well as objectivity, the fact-value dichotomy, the nature of truth, inductive logic, reductionism, materialism, etc.
Hilary Putnam was an American philosopher, mathematician, & computer scientist who was a central figure in analytic philosophy from the 1960s, especially in philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of mathematics, & philosophy of science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilary_Putnam
This interview is from a 1978 BBC program. Subtitles are available.
wn.com/Hilary Putnam On Philosophy Of Science Epistemology
Bryan Magee and Hilary Putnam discuss the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mathematics. An introductory overview is given of some of the conceptual issues which arise regarding knowledge and science including its nature, methodology, foundations, as well as objectivity, the fact-value dichotomy, the nature of truth, inductive logic, reductionism, materialism, etc.
Hilary Putnam was an American philosopher, mathematician, & computer scientist who was a central figure in analytic philosophy from the 1960s, especially in philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of mathematics, & philosophy of science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilary_Putnam
This interview is from a 1978 BBC program. Subtitles are available.
- published: 09 Nov 2015
- views: 4345
Roger Penrose - What does Quantum Theory Mean?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:48
- Updated: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 8030
Click here to see more video interviews on what quantum theory means http://bit.ly/1gk3pqa
Click here for more interviews from Roger Penrose http://bit.ly/19Ty...
Click here to see more video interviews on what quantum theory means http://bit.ly/1gk3pqa
Click here for more interviews from Roger Penrose http://bit.ly/19Tyygc
To buy Closer To Truth episodes click here http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For more video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
wn.com/Roger Penrose What Does Quantum Theory Mean
Click here to see more video interviews on what quantum theory means http://bit.ly/1gk3pqa
Click here for more interviews from Roger Penrose http://bit.ly/19Tyygc
To buy Closer To Truth episodes click here http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For more video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
- published: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 8030
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
11:01
Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
How far can science go? How much can science discover? Must all truth come from science? A...
published: 01 Apr 2016
Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
Bas van Fraassen - What are the Scope and Limits of Science?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Apr 2016
- views: 2177
86:06
Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
Our sense of self is readily extrapolated to engender paradoxes, but that sense is not eas...
published: 11 Apr 2014
Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
Bas van Fraassen: The Self, From a Logical Point of View
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 1117
89:19
Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
The 1960s saw many revolutions, worldwide, and some of that epoch's revolutionary spirit m...
published: 11 Apr 2014
Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
Bas van Fraassen: The Semantic Approach to Science, After 50 Years
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2014
- views: 3370
39:00
Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco S...
published: 15 Oct 2012
Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
Journées Hughes Leblanc Conférence_Serge Robert vs Bas van Fraassen (Deuxième partie).wmv
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Oct 2012
- views: 145
7:05
Bas van Fraassen
Bas van Fraassen
Bastiaan Cornelis van Fraassen (born 5 April 1941) is Distinguished Pr...
published: 22 Jan 2016
Bas van Fraassen
Bas van Fraassen
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Jan 2016
- views: 36
9:39
Are You Your Brain?
Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, metaphysics, Logic, rational, rea...
published: 15 Jun 2013
Are You Your Brain?
Are You Your Brain?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Jun 2013
- views: 1140
46:34
Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
Conférences Hugues Leblanc 2012
DU 5 AU 7 AVRIL 2012
Bas C. van Fraassen, San Francisco S...
published: 17 Oct 2012
Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
Journée Hughes Leblanc_Bas C. van Fraassen, Tracking Truth, via Possible Statistics (3e partie).wmv
- Report rights infringement
- published: 17 Oct 2012
- views: 1017
7:27
7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
published: 12 Mar 2013
7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
7 - 5 - Part Five - Scientific Anti-Realism Constructive Empiricism (0726)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Mar 2013
- views: 2242
19:01
Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
Masterstudiengang Wissenschaftsphilosophie http://tinyurl.com/WissPhil
Vorlesung "Wissensc...
published: 28 Jul 2015
Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
Wissenschaftstheorie 6.6: Bas van Fraassen: Konstruktiver Empirismus. Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt
- Report rights infringement
- published: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 217
9:45
Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
Florence (Italy) 11-21-2009, Sala del Gonfalone della Regione Toscana
published: 24 Nov 2009
Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
Giulio Preti International Prize - Bas van Fraassen's speech (part 2)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 24 Nov 2009
- views: 958
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
50:59
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski on 10 Science and Religion Myths - Part 1 - trinities 133
http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-133-dr-jeffrey-koperski-10-science-religion-myths-part-1...
published: 04 Apr 2016
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski on 10 Science and Religion Myths - Part 1 - trinities 133
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski on 10 Science and Religion Myths - Part 1 - trinities 133
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Apr 2016
- views: 197
6:35
Kitcher Scientific Realism
Kitcher's criticisms of van Fraassen's antirealism
published: 24 Feb 2014
Kitcher Scientific Realism
Kitcher Scientific Realism
- Report rights infringement
- published: 24 Feb 2014
- views: 444
8:08
Peter van Inwagen - How Does Metaphysics Reveal Reality?
Some think metaphysics is ancient nonsense; others that it's the bizarre occult. How does ...
published: 01 Feb 2016
Peter van Inwagen - How Does Metaphysics Reveal Reality?
Peter van Inwagen - How Does Metaphysics Reveal Reality?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Feb 2016
- views: 2182
43:57
Hilary Putnam on Philosophy of Science & Epistemology
Bryan Magee and Hilary Putnam discuss the philosophy of science and the philosophy of math...
published: 09 Nov 2015
Hilary Putnam on Philosophy of Science & Epistemology
Hilary Putnam on Philosophy of Science & Epistemology
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Nov 2015
- views: 4345
8:48
Roger Penrose - What does Quantum Theory Mean?
Click here to see more video interviews on what quantum theory means http://bit.ly/1gk3pqa...
published: 28 Jul 2015
Roger Penrose - What does Quantum Theory Mean?
Roger Penrose - What does Quantum Theory Mean?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 28 Jul 2015
- views: 8030
Dr. Jeffrey Koperski on 10 Science and Religion My...
Kitcher Scientific Realism...
Peter van Inwagen - How Does Metaphysics Reveal Re...
Hilary Putnam on Philosophy of Science & Epistemol...
