-
How The Druze revolted Against The Ottoman Empire In 1838
The 1838 Druze revolt was a Druze uprising in Syria against the authority of Ibrahim Pasha and effectively against the Khedivate of Egypt, ruled by Muhammad Ali. The rebellion was led by Druze clans of Mount Lebanon, with an aim to expel the Egyptian forces, under Ibrahim Pasha, who strongly envied the adherents of Druze faith, considering them as infidels. The revolt was suppressed with a bitter
-
Defence Of Damascus Aka Rebellion Against French Rule In Syria (1925)
Title reads: "Defence of Damascus. French troops - barricades - and armed posts - now circle the town of view of threatened attack by Rebels". Unsuccessful r...
-
WWI Arab Revolt- Unification usurped - Ottoman collapse - Arab nationalism
pre WWI Arab Revolt and during ww1
-
Syria "Where Have You Gone Shukri al-Quwatli ?" Damascus Grafitti Remembers an Elected President
دمشق المزة _ حملة بخ نصرة لريف الشام28-6-Revolutionary Grafitti Sprayer in Mezze upscale neighborhood of Damascus in Syria - Graffiti supports the Revolution...
-
Lebanon Druze chief meets Syria's Assad to mend ties
Lebanon's influential Druze leader Walid Jumblatt on Wednesday held a reconciliation meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on a fence-mending missio...
-
Druze Tito MITI se kunemo!!!
Smrt komuni!
-
Visite de Gabriel Puaux Haut Commissaire dans le Jebel Druze en Syrie en 1940
Tiré du "Journal de guerre n°30, semaine du 26 avril 1940" du site de l'ecpad http://www.ecpad.fr/journal-de-guerre-30-semaine-du-26-avril-1940.
-
Aki & Nuha - Komad duše (Prod. by GelerBeatz) [2013]
Artist: Aid Valjevac a.k.a Aki & Armin Nuhanović a.k.a Nuha Mix/mastering: Aki Beat: GelerBeatz https://soundcloud.com/revolt-sa Studio: New Era Sva prava pr...
-
Wallachian Revolt Against The Ottoman Empire In 1821
The Wallachian uprising of 1821 was an uprising in Wallachia (a region of Romania) against Ottoman rule which took place during 1821.
Background
Prince Alexandru Suţu's death in January 1821 led to the forming of a temporary Comitet de Ocârmuire ("Governing Committee"), three regents - all of them members of the most representative indigenous boyar families, of which the most prominent was Caima
-
Druze
This video is about the druze and the druze leader Sultan Basha Al Atrash. who lead syria to victory. and made the french army retreat. more videos http://ww...
-
The Bosnian Revolt Against Their Ottoman Overlords
The Bosnian uprising (also known as Great Bosnian Uprising) was a revolt of Bosniak ayans (landlords) against the Ottoman Empire. The casus belli were reforms implemented by the Sultan to abolish the ayan system.
Despite winning several notable victories, the rebels were eventually defeated in a battle near Sarajevo in 1832. Internal discord contributed to the failure of the rebellion, because Gr
-
Syrian mortars hit Israel's Golan Heights: Mount Hermon struck for first time during Syrian revolt
Two mortar shells explode in Israel's Mount Hermon marking the first time since the Syrian uprising began that shells struck the area.
-
How The Palestinian Peasants Revolted Against The Egyptians
The Peasants' Revolt was a rebellion against Egyptian conscription and taxation policies. While rebel ranks consisted mostly of the local peasantry, urban notables and Bedouin tribes also formed an integral part of the revolt, which was a collective reaction to Egypt's gradual elimination of the unofficial rights and privileges previously enjoyed by the various classes of society in the Levant und
-
Syria As A French Mandate
In 1920, a short-lived independent Kingdom of Syria was established under Faisal I of the Hashemite family. However, his rule over Syria ended after only a few months, following the Battle of Maysalun. French troops occupied Syria later that year after the San Remo conference proposed that the League of Nations put Syria under a French mandate.
In 1925, Sultan al-Atrash led a revolt that broke ou
-
Heavy Sevdah-Evo zadnje case druze
-
Trailwood Films - Jordan Israel - More Stories from the Holy Land
Our continuing journey through the Holy Lands explores the ancient land now known as Jordan. Sharing a border with Israel, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Saudi Ara...
-
MARŠAL - SUDNJI DAN
www.marsal.com.hr IZDAVAČ: DANCING BEAR "SUDNJI DAN" JE 11. PJESMA NA ALBUMU " REVOLT" ALBUM JE DOSTUPAN U CD-SHOPOVIMA PO POPULARNOJ CIJENI OD 49 Kn ! Tekst...
-
سلطان باشا الأطرش SULTAN BASHA ALATRASH 2/4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
-
سلطان باشا الأطرش SULTAN BASHA ALATRASH 3/4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
-
سلطان باشا الأطرش SULTAN BASHA ALATRASH 4/4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
-
MARŠAL - Taboo teme
www.marsal.com.hr
Izdavač: Dancing Bear
Album: Revolt
TABOO TEME
Kratim vrijeme na prividne probleme,
I krivim sve i svakog za to,
Moje teme su prazne sve do jedne,
Zabrazde u nelogičan tok,
Svuda idem skučen,
Budan, al' ne probuđen
Što da čine za me,
Ljubav i poštenje,
Kad su one, uz nadu,
Glavne tabu teme?
U hororu boli,
Ponos je kulisa,
A žrtva bez lica,
Bez povratnog hica,
Moli za oprost
-
MARŠAL - Kada snivam
www.marsal.com.hr Izdavač: Dancing Bear Album: Revolt KADA SNIVAM Na naš susret, Stigao nisam, Žalit' ću uvijek, Samo ja kriv sam, I sad lutam uzalud, Ni ne ...
-
"Ilinden" (1983) - Macedonian TV-series - part 3.7
Macedonian TV-series from 1983 - part 3 (Republic) The Ilinden uprising was an organized revolt against the Ottoman Empire prepared and carried out by the Ma...
How The Druze revolted Against The Ottoman Empire In 1838
The 1838 Druze revolt was a Druze uprising in Syria against the authority of Ibrahim Pasha and effectively against the Khedivate of Egypt, ruled by Muhammad Ali...
The 1838 Druze revolt was a Druze uprising in Syria against the authority of Ibrahim Pasha and effectively against the Khedivate of Egypt, ruled by Muhammad Ali. The rebellion was led by Druze clans of Mount Lebanon, with an aim to expel the Egyptian forces, under Ibrahim Pasha, who strongly envied the adherents of Druze faith, considering them as infidels. The revolt was suppressed with a bitter campaign by Pasha, after a major Druze defeat in the Wadi al-Taym, and the Egyptian rule effectively restored in Galilee and Mount Lebanon, with a peace agreement signed between the Egyptians and Druze leaders on July 23, 1838. Among the major sites of violence was the city of Safed, where the Jewish community was attacked by Druze rebels in early July 1838.
The tensions between the Druze and the Egyptians had been mounting since the 1834 Arab revolt in Palestine, which resulted in several deaths in Jerusalem, Hebron, Nablus and Safed. The ruling classes of the region resented Egyptian authority and the Druzes in particular resisted the rule of Ibrahim Pasha, who personally considered the Druze as heretics and oppressed them. What sparked the revolt itself, however, was the conscription decree of the Egyptian army.
Revolt
The first report of the Druze uprising were as of January 1838. Some 400 troops, led by Ali Agha al-Busayli, governor of Harran, attacked the Druzes in Tha'la, and suffered the first defeat, as Ali and a large number of his troops were killed. The Egyptian troops, dispatched from Damascus were slaughtered by Druze peasants during the night. Later, a second force of six thousand regulars was sent, requiring the Druze to reorganize for a more serious fighting. The Egyptian army, led by Muhammad Pasha caused the Druze to withdraw, but exhausted by the heavy mountainous terrain were repelled by the Druze fighters near Smaid. A new Egyptian force, led by Minikly Pasha, Egyptian Minister of War, and Sharif Pasha was again defeated by some 2,000 Druze insurgents.
The successive defeats prompted Ibrahim Pasha to arrive from Aleppo by himself. Ibrahim recruited loyal Albanians and recalled reinforcements from Hama, Acre and Aleppo, creating an army which according to British officials counted some 15,000 men. The force blockaded Lejat, while Sharif Pasha began negotiations with the insurgents. The Druze refused to lay their weapons, but concerned with the size of the amounting armies, tried to enlist additional forces to support the revolt from across Syria and Lebanon. The attempt was largely unsuccessful, and effectively failed.
In early April, Shibli al-Aryan attempted to secure more fighters from the supportive villages and succeeded in raising some 8,000 fighters. Soon, the Druze of Mt. Lebanon began streaming to join the rebel ranks, and from April it seemed the rebellion incorporated the entire Druze community. The main roads were cut by the Druze, disrupting the Egyptian army supplies. At this point, Ibrahim Pasha ordered Emir Bashir Shihab II, his ally, to send 1,000 men to Wadi al-Taym, where the clashes erupted on April 7. The Egyptian army was commanded by Ahmad Bek, consisting of an infantry regiment, 300 Bedouins and 500 irregulars, which succeeded to overwhelm the Druzes with 33 dead, scores wounded and 4 taken prisoners. Egyptian losses were 13 killed, 65 wounded.
wn.com/How The Druze Revolted Against The Ottoman Empire In 1838
The 1838 Druze revolt was a Druze uprising in Syria against the authority of Ibrahim Pasha and effectively against the Khedivate of Egypt, ruled by Muhammad Ali. The rebellion was led by Druze clans of Mount Lebanon, with an aim to expel the Egyptian forces, under Ibrahim Pasha, who strongly envied the adherents of Druze faith, considering them as infidels. The revolt was suppressed with a bitter campaign by Pasha, after a major Druze defeat in the Wadi al-Taym, and the Egyptian rule effectively restored in Galilee and Mount Lebanon, with a peace agreement signed between the Egyptians and Druze leaders on July 23, 1838. Among the major sites of violence was the city of Safed, where the Jewish community was attacked by Druze rebels in early July 1838.
The tensions between the Druze and the Egyptians had been mounting since the 1834 Arab revolt in Palestine, which resulted in several deaths in Jerusalem, Hebron, Nablus and Safed. The ruling classes of the region resented Egyptian authority and the Druzes in particular resisted the rule of Ibrahim Pasha, who personally considered the Druze as heretics and oppressed them. What sparked the revolt itself, however, was the conscription decree of the Egyptian army.
Revolt
The first report of the Druze uprising were as of January 1838. Some 400 troops, led by Ali Agha al-Busayli, governor of Harran, attacked the Druzes in Tha'la, and suffered the first defeat, as Ali and a large number of his troops were killed. The Egyptian troops, dispatched from Damascus were slaughtered by Druze peasants during the night. Later, a second force of six thousand regulars was sent, requiring the Druze to reorganize for a more serious fighting. The Egyptian army, led by Muhammad Pasha caused the Druze to withdraw, but exhausted by the heavy mountainous terrain were repelled by the Druze fighters near Smaid. A new Egyptian force, led by Minikly Pasha, Egyptian Minister of War, and Sharif Pasha was again defeated by some 2,000 Druze insurgents.
The successive defeats prompted Ibrahim Pasha to arrive from Aleppo by himself. Ibrahim recruited loyal Albanians and recalled reinforcements from Hama, Acre and Aleppo, creating an army which according to British officials counted some 15,000 men. The force blockaded Lejat, while Sharif Pasha began negotiations with the insurgents. The Druze refused to lay their weapons, but concerned with the size of the amounting armies, tried to enlist additional forces to support the revolt from across Syria and Lebanon. The attempt was largely unsuccessful, and effectively failed.
In early April, Shibli al-Aryan attempted to secure more fighters from the supportive villages and succeeded in raising some 8,000 fighters. Soon, the Druze of Mt. Lebanon began streaming to join the rebel ranks, and from April it seemed the rebellion incorporated the entire Druze community. The main roads were cut by the Druze, disrupting the Egyptian army supplies. At this point, Ibrahim Pasha ordered Emir Bashir Shihab II, his ally, to send 1,000 men to Wadi al-Taym, where the clashes erupted on April 7. The Egyptian army was commanded by Ahmad Bek, consisting of an infantry regiment, 300 Bedouins and 500 irregulars, which succeeded to overwhelm the Druzes with 33 dead, scores wounded and 4 taken prisoners. Egyptian losses were 13 killed, 65 wounded.
- published: 27 May 2015
- views: 2
Defence Of Damascus Aka Rebellion Against French Rule In Syria (1925)
Title reads: "Defence of Damascus. French troops - barricades - and armed posts - now circle the town of view of threatened attack by Rebels". Unsuccessful r......
Title reads: "Defence of Damascus. French troops - barricades - and armed posts - now circle the town of view of threatened attack by Rebels". Unsuccessful r...
wn.com/Defence Of Damascus Aka Rebellion Against French Rule In Syria (1925)
Title reads: "Defence of Damascus. French troops - barricades - and armed posts - now circle the town of view of threatened attack by Rebels". Unsuccessful r...
Syria "Where Have You Gone Shukri al-Quwatli ?" Damascus Grafitti Remembers an Elected President
دمشق المزة _ حملة بخ نصرة لريف الشام28-6-Revolutionary Grafitti Sprayer in Mezze upscale neighborhood of Damascus in Syria - Graffiti supports the Revolution......
دمشق المزة _ حملة بخ نصرة لريف الشام28-6-Revolutionary Grafitti Sprayer in Mezze upscale neighborhood of Damascus in Syria - Graffiti supports the Revolution...
wn.com/Syria Where Have You Gone Shukri Al Quwatli Damascus Grafitti Remembers An Elected President
دمشق المزة _ حملة بخ نصرة لريف الشام28-6-Revolutionary Grafitti Sprayer in Mezze upscale neighborhood of Damascus in Syria - Graffiti supports the Revolution...
Lebanon Druze chief meets Syria's Assad to mend ties
Lebanon's influential Druze leader Walid Jumblatt on Wednesday held a reconciliation meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on a fence-mending missio......
Lebanon's influential Druze leader Walid Jumblatt on Wednesday held a reconciliation meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on a fence-mending missio...
wn.com/Lebanon Druze Chief Meets Syria's Assad To Mend Ties
Lebanon's influential Druze leader Walid Jumblatt on Wednesday held a reconciliation meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on a fence-mending missio...
Visite de Gabriel Puaux Haut Commissaire dans le Jebel Druze en Syrie en 1940
Tiré du "Journal de guerre n°30, semaine du 26 avril 1940" du site de l'ecpad http://www.ecpad.fr/journal-de-guerre-30-semaine-du-26-avril-1940....
Tiré du "Journal de guerre n°30, semaine du 26 avril 1940" du site de l'ecpad http://www.ecpad.fr/journal-de-guerre-30-semaine-du-26-avril-1940.
wn.com/Visite De Gabriel Puaux Haut Commissaire Dans Le Jebel Druze En Syrie En 1940
Tiré du "Journal de guerre n°30, semaine du 26 avril 1940" du site de l'ecpad http://www.ecpad.fr/journal-de-guerre-30-semaine-du-26-avril-1940.
- published: 23 Feb 2014
- views: 120
-
author: Rabih R
Aki & Nuha - Komad duše (Prod. by GelerBeatz) [2013]
Artist: Aid Valjevac a.k.a Aki & Armin Nuhanović a.k.a Nuha Mix/mastering: Aki Beat: GelerBeatz https://soundcloud.com/revolt-sa Studio: New Era Sva prava pr......
Artist: Aid Valjevac a.k.a Aki & Armin Nuhanović a.k.a Nuha Mix/mastering: Aki Beat: GelerBeatz https://soundcloud.com/revolt-sa Studio: New Era Sva prava pr...
wn.com/Aki Nuha Komad Duše (Prod. By Gelerbeatz) 2013
Artist: Aid Valjevac a.k.a Aki & Armin Nuhanović a.k.a Nuha Mix/mastering: Aki Beat: GelerBeatz https://soundcloud.com/revolt-sa Studio: New Era Sva prava pr...
- published: 08 Mar 2013
- views: 220
-
author: Aki71000
Wallachian Revolt Against The Ottoman Empire In 1821
The Wallachian uprising of 1821 was an uprising in Wallachia (a region of Romania) against Ottoman rule which took place during 1821.
Background
Prince Alexan...
The Wallachian uprising of 1821 was an uprising in Wallachia (a region of Romania) against Ottoman rule which took place during 1821.
Background
Prince Alexandru Suţu's death in January 1821 led to the forming of a temporary Comitet de Ocârmuire ("Governing Committee"), three regents - all of them members of the most representative indigenous boyar families, of which the most prominent was Caimacam Grigore Brâncoveanu. The Comitet, motivated against competition and denied Phanariote rulers' favours, decided to quickly manoeuver anti-boyar and anti-Phanariote sentiment in Wallachia (and especially in Oltenia), acting before the newly appointed Scarlat Callimachi could claim his throne. Therefore, an agreement between it and the Pandurs was reached on the 15th: Dimitrie Macedonski was awarded the post of lieutenant to Tudor.
The very same day, Vladimirescu sent a letter to the Ottoman Court of Mahmud II, stating that his objective was not the rejection of Ottoman rule, but that of the Phanariote regime, and showing his willingness for preservation of the traditional institutions. The statements were meant to buy Tudor time against Ottoman response, as he was already in negotiations with the Greek Anti-Ottoman revolutionary society Philikí Etaireía (having probably been in contact with it from around 1819). Together, they produced a plan for insurrection, with the two Eterist representatives (Giorgakis Olympios and Ioannis Pharmackis) assuring the Wallachians of Russian support for the common cause. It is apparent that Tudor was not himself a member of the Etaireía: the rigid command structure of the Brotherhood would have excluded the need for any negotiations.
Rebellion
After fortifying monasteries in Oltenia (Tismana, Strehaia) that were to serve him in the event of Ottoman intervention, Tudor travelled to Padeș where he issued his first proclamation (January 23). It included references to Enlightenment principles (notably, the right to resist oppression), but was also an almost millenarianist appeal to peasants, promising a "spring" to follow "winter".
In February, the demands were detailed by more documents. They included: the elimination of purchased offices in the administration, with the introduction of meritocratic promotion, the suppression of certain taxes and taxing criteria, the reduction of the main tax, the founding of a Wallachian Army, and an end to internal custom duties. In line with these, Tudor asked for the banishment of some Phanariote families and forbidding future Princes to hold a retinue that would compete with local boyars for offices. Calls by boyars in the Divan for Tudor to cease such activities (expressed by envoy Nicolae Văcărescu) were met with a virulent refusal.
The army, swelled up in numbers as it advanced, occupied Bucharest on March 21 - here, Tudor issued another important proclamation, one that expressed yet again his commitment to peace with the Ottomans. Previously, the Philikí Etaireía under Alexander Ypsilanti had emerged in Moldavia, proclaiming a liberation from Ottoman rule that was backed by the then Moldavian Prince Mihail Suţu (see Greek War of Independence). However, this coincided with Russian reaction against Greek rebellion, with the Russian army entering Moldavia and enforcing Holy Alliance policies. Ypsilanti's army headed south, reaching Pandur-occupied Bucharest.
End of the Uprising
Tudor's actions in the meanwhile had destroyed his alliance to local boyars. He had started wearing the kalpak (a tall, cylindrical, black leather hat; see Ottoman Clothing) reserved for the Prince, and demanded to be addressed as Domn ("Master", "Prince"; cf. Domnitor) - moving away from subordination to the landowners' cause.
The meeting between Ypsilanti and Tudor brought a new compromise. Tudor considered himself liberated from the provisions of the January agreement, as Russia was now an enemy of the Etaireía; Ypsilanti tried to persuade him that Russian support was still possible. The country was divided into a Greek administration and a Wallachian one, with Tudor's declaring itself neutral in the face of large Ottoman armies preparing to cross the north of the Danube. Ottoman actions had been prompted by Russian threat of intervention in Wallachia.
wn.com/Wallachian Revolt Against The Ottoman Empire In 1821
The Wallachian uprising of 1821 was an uprising in Wallachia (a region of Romania) against Ottoman rule which took place during 1821.
Background
Prince Alexandru Suţu's death in January 1821 led to the forming of a temporary Comitet de Ocârmuire ("Governing Committee"), three regents - all of them members of the most representative indigenous boyar families, of which the most prominent was Caimacam Grigore Brâncoveanu. The Comitet, motivated against competition and denied Phanariote rulers' favours, decided to quickly manoeuver anti-boyar and anti-Phanariote sentiment in Wallachia (and especially in Oltenia), acting before the newly appointed Scarlat Callimachi could claim his throne. Therefore, an agreement between it and the Pandurs was reached on the 15th: Dimitrie Macedonski was awarded the post of lieutenant to Tudor.
The very same day, Vladimirescu sent a letter to the Ottoman Court of Mahmud II, stating that his objective was not the rejection of Ottoman rule, but that of the Phanariote regime, and showing his willingness for preservation of the traditional institutions. The statements were meant to buy Tudor time against Ottoman response, as he was already in negotiations with the Greek Anti-Ottoman revolutionary society Philikí Etaireía (having probably been in contact with it from around 1819). Together, they produced a plan for insurrection, with the two Eterist representatives (Giorgakis Olympios and Ioannis Pharmackis) assuring the Wallachians of Russian support for the common cause. It is apparent that Tudor was not himself a member of the Etaireía: the rigid command structure of the Brotherhood would have excluded the need for any negotiations.
Rebellion
After fortifying monasteries in Oltenia (Tismana, Strehaia) that were to serve him in the event of Ottoman intervention, Tudor travelled to Padeș where he issued his first proclamation (January 23). It included references to Enlightenment principles (notably, the right to resist oppression), but was also an almost millenarianist appeal to peasants, promising a "spring" to follow "winter".
In February, the demands were detailed by more documents. They included: the elimination of purchased offices in the administration, with the introduction of meritocratic promotion, the suppression of certain taxes and taxing criteria, the reduction of the main tax, the founding of a Wallachian Army, and an end to internal custom duties. In line with these, Tudor asked for the banishment of some Phanariote families and forbidding future Princes to hold a retinue that would compete with local boyars for offices. Calls by boyars in the Divan for Tudor to cease such activities (expressed by envoy Nicolae Văcărescu) were met with a virulent refusal.
The army, swelled up in numbers as it advanced, occupied Bucharest on March 21 - here, Tudor issued another important proclamation, one that expressed yet again his commitment to peace with the Ottomans. Previously, the Philikí Etaireía under Alexander Ypsilanti had emerged in Moldavia, proclaiming a liberation from Ottoman rule that was backed by the then Moldavian Prince Mihail Suţu (see Greek War of Independence). However, this coincided with Russian reaction against Greek rebellion, with the Russian army entering Moldavia and enforcing Holy Alliance policies. Ypsilanti's army headed south, reaching Pandur-occupied Bucharest.
End of the Uprising
Tudor's actions in the meanwhile had destroyed his alliance to local boyars. He had started wearing the kalpak (a tall, cylindrical, black leather hat; see Ottoman Clothing) reserved for the Prince, and demanded to be addressed as Domn ("Master", "Prince"; cf. Domnitor) - moving away from subordination to the landowners' cause.
The meeting between Ypsilanti and Tudor brought a new compromise. Tudor considered himself liberated from the provisions of the January agreement, as Russia was now an enemy of the Etaireía; Ypsilanti tried to persuade him that Russian support was still possible. The country was divided into a Greek administration and a Wallachian one, with Tudor's declaring itself neutral in the face of large Ottoman armies preparing to cross the north of the Danube. Ottoman actions had been prompted by Russian threat of intervention in Wallachia.
- published: 27 May 2015
- views: 0
Druze
This video is about the druze and the druze leader Sultan Basha Al Atrash. who lead syria to victory. and made the french army retreat. more videos http://ww......
This video is about the druze and the druze leader Sultan Basha Al Atrash. who lead syria to victory. and made the french army retreat. more videos http://ww...
wn.com/Druze
This video is about the druze and the druze leader Sultan Basha Al Atrash. who lead syria to victory. and made the french army retreat. more videos http://ww...
- published: 26 Jul 2007
- views: 96799
-
author: isildur555
The Bosnian Revolt Against Their Ottoman Overlords
The Bosnian uprising (also known as Great Bosnian Uprising) was a revolt of Bosniak ayans (landlords) against the Ottoman Empire. The casus belli were reforms i...
The Bosnian uprising (also known as Great Bosnian Uprising) was a revolt of Bosniak ayans (landlords) against the Ottoman Empire. The casus belli were reforms implemented by the Sultan to abolish the ayan system.
Despite winning several notable victories, the rebels were eventually defeated in a battle near Sarajevo in 1832. Internal discord contributed to the failure of the rebellion, because Gradaščević was not supported by much of the Herzegovinian nobility.
As a result, Ali-paša Rizvanbegović was named pasha of the Herzegovina Eyalet which was seceded in 1833. The Sultan implemented the new muselim system, abolishind the old ayan system. The new muselims were mostly old ayans, but in 1850 Omer Pasha completely eliminated old ayan families.
In the late 1820s, Sultan Mahmud II reintroduced a set of reforms that called for further expansion of the centrally controlled army (nizam), new taxes and more Ottoman bureaucracy. These reforms weakened the special status and privileges Bosnian beys had enjoyed under the Ottoman Empire and coupled with the growing power and position of other European people under Ottoman control caused much anger and alarm. Contrary to popular belief, however, the future leader of the autonomy movement, Husein Gradaščević, then just a local official, was not greatly opposed to these reforms.
In 1826, when the Sultan issued a decree abolishing the janissaries in Bosnia, Gradaščević's immediate reaction was not unlike that of the rest of the Bosnian aristocracy. Gradaščević threatened that he would use military force to subdue anybody opposed to the Sarajevo janissaries. When the janissaries killed nakibul-ešraf Nuruddin Efendi Šerifović, however, his tone shifted and he rapidly distanced himself from their cause.
For the rest of the 1820s, Gradaščević generally maintained good relations with imperial authorities in Bosnia. When Abdurrahim-paša became vizier in 1827, Gradaščević was said to have become one of his more trusted advisors. This culminated in Gradaščević's large role in the Bosnian mobilization for the Russo-Ottoman war. Following a riot in the Sarajevo camp during these preparations, Gradaščević even provided shelter for the ousted Abdurrahim-paša in Gradačac before assisting him in his escape from the country. Gradaščević was also relatively loyal to Abdurrahim's successor, Namik-paša, reinforcing Ottoman garrisons in Šabac upon his orders.
The turning point for Gradaščević came with the end of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1828–1829 and the Treaty of Adrianople on 14 September 1829. According to the provisions of the treaty and a subsequent Hatt-i Sharif, the Ottoman Empire granted suzerainty to Serbia as a result of the Serbian revolution. In a move that outraged Bosniaks and launched numerous protests, newly autonomous Serbia was also given six districts (Bosnian: nahijas) that had traditionally belonged to Bosnia. Following this move, seen as the confiscation of historically Bosnian lands[citation needed], the Bosnian autonomy movement was born.
Between 20 and 31 December 1830, Gradaščević hosted a gathering of Bosniak aristocrats in Gradačac. A month later, from 20 January to 5 February, another meeting was held in Tuzla to prepare for the revolt. From there, a call was issued to the Bosnian populace asking them to rise up to the defense of Bosnia. It was then that the popular Husein-kapetan was unofficially chosen to head the movement.
Rising tide and early successes
Another outcome of the Tuzla meeting was an agreement that another general meeting should be held in Travnik. Since Travnik was the seat of the Bosnian pashaluk and the vizier, the planned meeting was in effect a direct confrontation with Ottoman authority. Gradaščević thus asked all involved to help assemble an army beforehand. On 29 March 1831, Gradaščević set out towards Travnik with some 4,000 men.
Upon hearing word of the oncoming force, Namik-paša is said to have gone to the Travnik fort and called the Sulejmanpašić brothers to his aid. When the rebel army arrived in Travnik they fired several warning shots at the castle, warning the vizier that they were prepared for a military encounter. Meanwhile, Gradaščević sent a detachment of his forces, under the command of Memiš-aga of Srebrenica, to meet Sulejmanpašić's reinforcements.
The two sides met at Pirot, on the outskirts of Travnik, on 7 April. There, Memiš-aga defeated the Sulejmanpašić brothers and their 2,000-man army, forcing them to retreat and destroying the possessions of the Sulejmanpašić family. On 21 May, Namik-paša fled to Stolac following a short siege. Soon afterwards, Gradaščević proclaimed himself the Commander of Bosnia, chosen by the will of the people.
wn.com/The Bosnian Revolt Against Their Ottoman Overlords
The Bosnian uprising (also known as Great Bosnian Uprising) was a revolt of Bosniak ayans (landlords) against the Ottoman Empire. The casus belli were reforms implemented by the Sultan to abolish the ayan system.
Despite winning several notable victories, the rebels were eventually defeated in a battle near Sarajevo in 1832. Internal discord contributed to the failure of the rebellion, because Gradaščević was not supported by much of the Herzegovinian nobility.
As a result, Ali-paša Rizvanbegović was named pasha of the Herzegovina Eyalet which was seceded in 1833. The Sultan implemented the new muselim system, abolishind the old ayan system. The new muselims were mostly old ayans, but in 1850 Omer Pasha completely eliminated old ayan families.
In the late 1820s, Sultan Mahmud II reintroduced a set of reforms that called for further expansion of the centrally controlled army (nizam), new taxes and more Ottoman bureaucracy. These reforms weakened the special status and privileges Bosnian beys had enjoyed under the Ottoman Empire and coupled with the growing power and position of other European people under Ottoman control caused much anger and alarm. Contrary to popular belief, however, the future leader of the autonomy movement, Husein Gradaščević, then just a local official, was not greatly opposed to these reforms.
In 1826, when the Sultan issued a decree abolishing the janissaries in Bosnia, Gradaščević's immediate reaction was not unlike that of the rest of the Bosnian aristocracy. Gradaščević threatened that he would use military force to subdue anybody opposed to the Sarajevo janissaries. When the janissaries killed nakibul-ešraf Nuruddin Efendi Šerifović, however, his tone shifted and he rapidly distanced himself from their cause.
For the rest of the 1820s, Gradaščević generally maintained good relations with imperial authorities in Bosnia. When Abdurrahim-paša became vizier in 1827, Gradaščević was said to have become one of his more trusted advisors. This culminated in Gradaščević's large role in the Bosnian mobilization for the Russo-Ottoman war. Following a riot in the Sarajevo camp during these preparations, Gradaščević even provided shelter for the ousted Abdurrahim-paša in Gradačac before assisting him in his escape from the country. Gradaščević was also relatively loyal to Abdurrahim's successor, Namik-paša, reinforcing Ottoman garrisons in Šabac upon his orders.
The turning point for Gradaščević came with the end of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1828–1829 and the Treaty of Adrianople on 14 September 1829. According to the provisions of the treaty and a subsequent Hatt-i Sharif, the Ottoman Empire granted suzerainty to Serbia as a result of the Serbian revolution. In a move that outraged Bosniaks and launched numerous protests, newly autonomous Serbia was also given six districts (Bosnian: nahijas) that had traditionally belonged to Bosnia. Following this move, seen as the confiscation of historically Bosnian lands[citation needed], the Bosnian autonomy movement was born.
Between 20 and 31 December 1830, Gradaščević hosted a gathering of Bosniak aristocrats in Gradačac. A month later, from 20 January to 5 February, another meeting was held in Tuzla to prepare for the revolt. From there, a call was issued to the Bosnian populace asking them to rise up to the defense of Bosnia. It was then that the popular Husein-kapetan was unofficially chosen to head the movement.
Rising tide and early successes
Another outcome of the Tuzla meeting was an agreement that another general meeting should be held in Travnik. Since Travnik was the seat of the Bosnian pashaluk and the vizier, the planned meeting was in effect a direct confrontation with Ottoman authority. Gradaščević thus asked all involved to help assemble an army beforehand. On 29 March 1831, Gradaščević set out towards Travnik with some 4,000 men.
Upon hearing word of the oncoming force, Namik-paša is said to have gone to the Travnik fort and called the Sulejmanpašić brothers to his aid. When the rebel army arrived in Travnik they fired several warning shots at the castle, warning the vizier that they were prepared for a military encounter. Meanwhile, Gradaščević sent a detachment of his forces, under the command of Memiš-aga of Srebrenica, to meet Sulejmanpašić's reinforcements.
The two sides met at Pirot, on the outskirts of Travnik, on 7 April. There, Memiš-aga defeated the Sulejmanpašić brothers and their 2,000-man army, forcing them to retreat and destroying the possessions of the Sulejmanpašić family. On 21 May, Namik-paša fled to Stolac following a short siege. Soon afterwards, Gradaščević proclaimed himself the Commander of Bosnia, chosen by the will of the people.
- published: 27 May 2015
- views: 0
Syrian mortars hit Israel's Golan Heights: Mount Hermon struck for first time during Syrian revolt
Two mortar shells explode in Israel's Mount Hermon marking the first time since the Syrian uprising began that shells struck the area....
Two mortar shells explode in Israel's Mount Hermon marking the first time since the Syrian uprising began that shells struck the area.
wn.com/Syrian Mortars Hit Israel's Golan Heights Mount Hermon Struck For First Time During Syrian Revolt
Two mortar shells explode in Israel's Mount Hermon marking the first time since the Syrian uprising began that shells struck the area.
How The Palestinian Peasants Revolted Against The Egyptians
The Peasants' Revolt was a rebellion against Egyptian conscription and taxation policies. While rebel ranks consisted mostly of the local peasantry, urban notab...
The Peasants' Revolt was a rebellion against Egyptian conscription and taxation policies. While rebel ranks consisted mostly of the local peasantry, urban notables and Bedouin tribes also formed an integral part of the revolt, which was a collective reaction to Egypt's gradual elimination of the unofficial rights and privileges previously enjoyed by the various classes of society in the Levant under Ottoman rule.
As part of Muhammad Ali's modernization policies, Ibrahim Pasha, the Egyptian governor of the Levant issued conscription orders for every fifth Muslim male. Encouraged by local chief Qasim al-Ahmad, the notables of Nablus, Hebron and the Jerusalem-Jaffa area did not abide by Ibrahim Pasha's orders to conscript and tax the local peasantry. Al-Ahmad and other local clan leaders rallied their kinsmen and engaged in an open revolt against the authorities in May 1834, taking control of several towns. While the core of the fighting was in the central mountain regions of Palestine (Samaria and Judea), the revolt also spread to the Galilee, Gaza and parts of Transjordan. Jerusalem was briefly captured by the rebels and plundered. Faced with the superior firepower and organization of Ibrahim Pasha's troops, the rebels were defeated in Jabal Nablus, Jerusalem and the coastal plain before their final defeat in Hebron, which was leveled. Afterward, Muhammad Ali's troops pursued and captured al-Ahmad in al-Karak, which was also leveled.
Baruch Kimmerling and Joel S. Migdal argue that the revolt was a formative event for the Palestinian sense of nationhood, in that it brought together disparate groups against a common enemy. These groups are some of those that reemerged later to constitute the Palestinian people. The revolt represented a rare moment of political unity in Palestine. However, the ultimate intention of the notables and rebel leaders was to force out the Egyptian army and reinstate Ottoman rule as a means of restoring the Ottoman-era standards that defined the relationship between the government and the governed. These standards were made up of the religious laws, administrative codes and local norms and customs that were disrupted by Egyptian reforms.
In consolidating his power, Muhammad Ali, the rebel ruler of Ottoman Egypt, ruled autocratically, while taking his model from the organization of bureaucracy characteristic of modern European states. Like earlier rulers of Egypt, Muhammad Ali desired to exercise control over greater Syria (Bilad al-Sham), both for its strategic value and for its rich natural resources. Not only did Syria have abundant natural resources, it also boasted a thriving international trading community with well-developed markets. In addition, in his strategy it would be a captive market for goods then being produced in Egypt. More importantly, the extension of Egyptian control over Syria was desirable because it would serve as a buffer state between Egypt and the Ottoman sultan in Constantinople.
A new fleet and army was raised and built, and on 31 October 1831, under Ibrahim Pasha, Ali's eldest son, the Egyptian invasion of Syria began, which initiated the First Egyptian–Ottoman War. For the sake of international appearances, the pretext for the expedition was a quarrel with Abdullah Pasha of Acre. Wāli Ali alleged that 6,000 fellaheen (peasant, farmer or agricultural labourer) had fled to Acre to escape the draft, corvée, and taxes, and he demanded their return. Ibrahim Pasha advanced through Palestine, occupying Haifa in December 1831, and then using the city as his primary military base.
Events preceding the revolt
By May 1834, the last prominent ally of the Egyptians in Palestine was the Abd al-Hadi clan. Egyptian economic and political policies had alienated four broad and influential factions in Palestine, namely the effendiyat (notables) of Jerusalem, the bulk of the major clans in Jabal Nablus, the clans of the Jerusalem hinterland, and the Bedouin tribes in the areas of Hebron and Bethlehem.
wn.com/How The Palestinian Peasants Revolted Against The Egyptians
The Peasants' Revolt was a rebellion against Egyptian conscription and taxation policies. While rebel ranks consisted mostly of the local peasantry, urban notables and Bedouin tribes also formed an integral part of the revolt, which was a collective reaction to Egypt's gradual elimination of the unofficial rights and privileges previously enjoyed by the various classes of society in the Levant under Ottoman rule.
As part of Muhammad Ali's modernization policies, Ibrahim Pasha, the Egyptian governor of the Levant issued conscription orders for every fifth Muslim male. Encouraged by local chief Qasim al-Ahmad, the notables of Nablus, Hebron and the Jerusalem-Jaffa area did not abide by Ibrahim Pasha's orders to conscript and tax the local peasantry. Al-Ahmad and other local clan leaders rallied their kinsmen and engaged in an open revolt against the authorities in May 1834, taking control of several towns. While the core of the fighting was in the central mountain regions of Palestine (Samaria and Judea), the revolt also spread to the Galilee, Gaza and parts of Transjordan. Jerusalem was briefly captured by the rebels and plundered. Faced with the superior firepower and organization of Ibrahim Pasha's troops, the rebels were defeated in Jabal Nablus, Jerusalem and the coastal plain before their final defeat in Hebron, which was leveled. Afterward, Muhammad Ali's troops pursued and captured al-Ahmad in al-Karak, which was also leveled.
Baruch Kimmerling and Joel S. Migdal argue that the revolt was a formative event for the Palestinian sense of nationhood, in that it brought together disparate groups against a common enemy. These groups are some of those that reemerged later to constitute the Palestinian people. The revolt represented a rare moment of political unity in Palestine. However, the ultimate intention of the notables and rebel leaders was to force out the Egyptian army and reinstate Ottoman rule as a means of restoring the Ottoman-era standards that defined the relationship between the government and the governed. These standards were made up of the religious laws, administrative codes and local norms and customs that were disrupted by Egyptian reforms.
In consolidating his power, Muhammad Ali, the rebel ruler of Ottoman Egypt, ruled autocratically, while taking his model from the organization of bureaucracy characteristic of modern European states. Like earlier rulers of Egypt, Muhammad Ali desired to exercise control over greater Syria (Bilad al-Sham), both for its strategic value and for its rich natural resources. Not only did Syria have abundant natural resources, it also boasted a thriving international trading community with well-developed markets. In addition, in his strategy it would be a captive market for goods then being produced in Egypt. More importantly, the extension of Egyptian control over Syria was desirable because it would serve as a buffer state between Egypt and the Ottoman sultan in Constantinople.
A new fleet and army was raised and built, and on 31 October 1831, under Ibrahim Pasha, Ali's eldest son, the Egyptian invasion of Syria began, which initiated the First Egyptian–Ottoman War. For the sake of international appearances, the pretext for the expedition was a quarrel with Abdullah Pasha of Acre. Wāli Ali alleged that 6,000 fellaheen (peasant, farmer or agricultural labourer) had fled to Acre to escape the draft, corvée, and taxes, and he demanded their return. Ibrahim Pasha advanced through Palestine, occupying Haifa in December 1831, and then using the city as his primary military base.
Events preceding the revolt
By May 1834, the last prominent ally of the Egyptians in Palestine was the Abd al-Hadi clan. Egyptian economic and political policies had alienated four broad and influential factions in Palestine, namely the effendiyat (notables) of Jerusalem, the bulk of the major clans in Jabal Nablus, the clans of the Jerusalem hinterland, and the Bedouin tribes in the areas of Hebron and Bethlehem.
- published: 27 May 2015
- views: 0
Syria As A French Mandate
In 1920, a short-lived independent Kingdom of Syria was established under Faisal I of the Hashemite family. However, his rule over Syria ended after only a few ...
In 1920, a short-lived independent Kingdom of Syria was established under Faisal I of the Hashemite family. However, his rule over Syria ended after only a few months, following the Battle of Maysalun. French troops occupied Syria later that year after the San Remo conference proposed that the League of Nations put Syria under a French mandate.
In 1925, Sultan al-Atrash led a revolt that broke out in the Druze Mountain and spread to engulf the whole of Syria and parts of Lebanon. Al-Atrash won several battles against the French, notably the Battle of al-Kafr on 21 July 1925, the Battle of al-Mazraa on 2–3 August 1925, and the battles of Salkhad, al-Musayfirah and Suwayda. France sent thousands of troops from Morocco and Senegal, leading the French to regain many cities, although resistance lasted until the spring of 1927. The French sentenced Sultan al-Atrash to death, but he had escaped with the rebels to Transjordan and was eventually pardoned. He returned to Syria in 1937 after the signing of the Syrian-French Treaty.
Syria and France negotiated a treaty of independence in September 1936, and Hashim al-Atassi was the first president to be elected under the first incarnation of the modern republic of Syria. However, the treaty never came into force because the French Legislature refused to ratify it. With the fall of France in 1940 during World War II, Syria came under the control of Vichy France until the British and Free French occupied the country in the Syria-Lebanon campaign in July 1941. Continuing pressure from Syrian nationalists and the British forced the French to evacuate their troops in April 1946, leaving the country in the hands of a republican government that had been formed during the mandate.
wn.com/Syria As A French Mandate
In 1920, a short-lived independent Kingdom of Syria was established under Faisal I of the Hashemite family. However, his rule over Syria ended after only a few months, following the Battle of Maysalun. French troops occupied Syria later that year after the San Remo conference proposed that the League of Nations put Syria under a French mandate.
In 1925, Sultan al-Atrash led a revolt that broke out in the Druze Mountain and spread to engulf the whole of Syria and parts of Lebanon. Al-Atrash won several battles against the French, notably the Battle of al-Kafr on 21 July 1925, the Battle of al-Mazraa on 2–3 August 1925, and the battles of Salkhad, al-Musayfirah and Suwayda. France sent thousands of troops from Morocco and Senegal, leading the French to regain many cities, although resistance lasted until the spring of 1927. The French sentenced Sultan al-Atrash to death, but he had escaped with the rebels to Transjordan and was eventually pardoned. He returned to Syria in 1937 after the signing of the Syrian-French Treaty.
Syria and France negotiated a treaty of independence in September 1936, and Hashim al-Atassi was the first president to be elected under the first incarnation of the modern republic of Syria. However, the treaty never came into force because the French Legislature refused to ratify it. With the fall of France in 1940 during World War II, Syria came under the control of Vichy France until the British and Free French occupied the country in the Syria-Lebanon campaign in July 1941. Continuing pressure from Syrian nationalists and the British forced the French to evacuate their troops in April 1946, leaving the country in the hands of a republican government that had been formed during the mandate.
- published: 10 May 2015
- views: 0
Trailwood Films - Jordan Israel - More Stories from the Holy Land
Our continuing journey through the Holy Lands explores the ancient land now known as Jordan. Sharing a border with Israel, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Saudi Ara......
Our continuing journey through the Holy Lands explores the ancient land now known as Jordan. Sharing a border with Israel, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Saudi Ara...
wn.com/Trailwood Films Jordan Israel More Stories From The Holy Land
Our continuing journey through the Holy Lands explores the ancient land now known as Jordan. Sharing a border with Israel, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Saudi Ara...
MARŠAL - SUDNJI DAN
www.marsal.com.hr IZDAVAČ: DANCING BEAR "SUDNJI DAN" JE 11. PJESMA NA ALBUMU " REVOLT" ALBUM JE DOSTUPAN U CD-SHOPOVIMA PO POPULARNOJ CIJENI OD 49 Kn ! Tekst......
www.marsal.com.hr IZDAVAČ: DANCING BEAR "SUDNJI DAN" JE 11. PJESMA NA ALBUMU " REVOLT" ALBUM JE DOSTUPAN U CD-SHOPOVIMA PO POPULARNOJ CIJENI OD 49 Kn ! Tekst...
wn.com/Maršal Sudnji Dan
www.marsal.com.hr IZDAVAČ: DANCING BEAR "SUDNJI DAN" JE 11. PJESMA NA ALBUMU " REVOLT" ALBUM JE DOSTUPAN U CD-SHOPOVIMA PO POPULARNOJ CIJENI OD 49 Kn ! Tekst...
- published: 05 Apr 2013
- views: 17105
-
author: marsalband
سلطان باشا الأطرش SULTAN BASHA ALATRASH 2/4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P......
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
wn.com/سلطان باشا الأطرش Sultan Basha Alatrash 2 4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
- published: 15 Jun 2009
- views: 10316
-
author: RNBSyria
سلطان باشا الأطرش SULTAN BASHA ALATRASH 3/4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P......
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
wn.com/سلطان باشا الأطرش Sultan Basha Alatrash 3 4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
- published: 15 Jun 2009
- views: 6041
-
author: RNBSyria
سلطان باشا الأطرش SULTAN BASHA ALATRASH 4/4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P......
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
wn.com/سلطان باشا الأطرش Sultan Basha Alatrash 4 4
إهداء لروح القائد العربي الخالد سلطان باشا الأطرش وتخليدا لثورته العظيمة وإلى كل عربي حر,القائد العام للثورة السورية الكبرى (1925-1927) ضد الأنتداب الفرنسي P...
- published: 15 Jun 2009
- views: 8264
-
author: RNBSyria
MARŠAL - Taboo teme
www.marsal.com.hr
Izdavač: Dancing Bear
Album: Revolt
TABOO TEME
Kratim vrijeme na prividne probleme,
I krivim sve i svakog za to,
Moje teme su prazne sve do j...
www.marsal.com.hr
Izdavač: Dancing Bear
Album: Revolt
TABOO TEME
Kratim vrijeme na prividne probleme,
I krivim sve i svakog za to,
Moje teme su prazne sve do jedne,
Zabrazde u nelogičan tok,
Svuda idem skučen,
Budan, al' ne probuđen
Što da čine za me,
Ljubav i poštenje,
Kad su one, uz nadu,
Glavne tabu teme?
U hororu boli,
Ponos je kulisa,
A žrtva bez lica,
Bez povratnog hica,
Moli za oprost krivca
Dani prolaze bez da me i opaze,
Bezdan krije mene i noć,
Sanjam obraze što sa svima odlaze,
Rosa ima nad njima moć,
Sa mnom vlada u odsutstvu,
Ranom stradam u prisutstvu,
Što da čine za me,
Ljubav i poštenje,
Kad su one, uz nadu,
Glavne tabu teme?
U hororu boli,
Ponos je kulisa,
A žrtva bez lica,
Bez povratnog hica,
Moli za oprost krivca
Sva prava pridržana, Maršal, Sinj
wn.com/Maršal Taboo Teme
www.marsal.com.hr
Izdavač: Dancing Bear
Album: Revolt
TABOO TEME
Kratim vrijeme na prividne probleme,
I krivim sve i svakog za to,
Moje teme su prazne sve do jedne,
Zabrazde u nelogičan tok,
Svuda idem skučen,
Budan, al' ne probuđen
Što da čine za me,
Ljubav i poštenje,
Kad su one, uz nadu,
Glavne tabu teme?
U hororu boli,
Ponos je kulisa,
A žrtva bez lica,
Bez povratnog hica,
Moli za oprost krivca
Dani prolaze bez da me i opaze,
Bezdan krije mene i noć,
Sanjam obraze što sa svima odlaze,
Rosa ima nad njima moć,
Sa mnom vlada u odsutstvu,
Ranom stradam u prisutstvu,
Što da čine za me,
Ljubav i poštenje,
Kad su one, uz nadu,
Glavne tabu teme?
U hororu boli,
Ponos je kulisa,
A žrtva bez lica,
Bez povratnog hica,
Moli za oprost krivca
Sva prava pridržana, Maršal, Sinj
- published: 02 Apr 2014
- views: 72
MARŠAL - Kada snivam
www.marsal.com.hr Izdavač: Dancing Bear Album: Revolt KADA SNIVAM Na naš susret, Stigao nisam, Žalit' ću uvijek, Samo ja kriv sam, I sad lutam uzalud, Ni ne ......
www.marsal.com.hr Izdavač: Dancing Bear Album: Revolt KADA SNIVAM Na naš susret, Stigao nisam, Žalit' ću uvijek, Samo ja kriv sam, I sad lutam uzalud, Ni ne ...
wn.com/Maršal Kada Snivam
www.marsal.com.hr Izdavač: Dancing Bear Album: Revolt KADA SNIVAM Na naš susret, Stigao nisam, Žalit' ću uvijek, Samo ja kriv sam, I sad lutam uzalud, Ni ne ...
- published: 02 Apr 2014
- views: 645
-
author: marsalband
"Ilinden" (1983) - Macedonian TV-series - part 3.7
Macedonian TV-series from 1983 - part 3 (Republic) The Ilinden uprising was an organized revolt against the Ottoman Empire prepared and carried out by the Ma......
Macedonian TV-series from 1983 - part 3 (Republic) The Ilinden uprising was an organized revolt against the Ottoman Empire prepared and carried out by the Ma...
wn.com/Ilinden (1983) Macedonian Tv Series Part 3.7
Macedonian TV-series from 1983 - part 3 (Republic) The Ilinden uprising was an organized revolt against the Ottoman Empire prepared and carried out by the Ma...
- published: 13 Nov 2007
- views: 4372
-
author: Makedonier
-
Rivalry between Ariel Sharon around Ayoob Kara expulsion of Jews
The special film on the rivalry between Ariel Sharon around Ayoob Kara expulsion of Jews from Gush Katif Bloodshed, uncompromising rivalry did not like the c...
-
The Russo-Turkish War Of 1877-78 - "93 Harbi"
The Russo-Turkish War of 1877--78 (Russian: Русско-турецкая война (1877--1878 гг.); Ottoman Turkish: ۹۳ حربی, Doksan Üç Harbi ('93 Harbi, "93 War"); Turkish: '93 Harbi or 1877--78 Osmanlı-Rus Savaşı; Bulgarian: Руско-турска освободителна война (1877--1878 г.)) was a conflict between the Ottoman Empire and the Eastern Orthodox coalition led by the Russian Empire and composed of several Balkan count
-
The Extraordinary Life of an Adventurer, Adviser to Kings, Ally of Lawrence of Arabia (1997)
Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell, CBE (14 July 1868 -- 12 July 1926) was an English writer, traveller, political officer, administrator, archaeologist and spy...
-
Ottoman Legacy: Modern Middle East
The Middle East (also Mid-East in US usage) is a region that roughly encompasses a majority of Western Asia (excluding the Caucasus) and Egypt. The term is u...
-
Who Are The Alawites?
The Alawites, also known as Alawis (ʿAlawīyyah Arabic: علوية), are a prominent religious group, centred in Syria, who follow a branch of the Twelver school of Shia Islam but with syncretistic elements. Alawites revere Ali (Ali ibn Abi Talib), and the name "Alawi" means followers of Ali. The sect is believed to have been founded by Ibn Nusayr during the 9th century. For this reason, Alawites are s
-
TNL - Jeruslam's NON-Official Response to the Events in Egypt
-
3. A Critique of Ibn Taymiyyah & Extremism - Maulana Syed Muhammad Baqir Qazwini
MP3: https://s3.amazonaws.com/JCC/Muharram/1436/3rdNightMuharram1436_Qazwini_2014-10-27_200418705.mp3
3rd Night Muharram 1436
Recited By: Maulana Syed Muhammad Baqir Qazwini
Date: October 27th, 2014
www.facebook.com/IslamiCentre.org
www.islamicentre.org
-
How Muhammad Ali Pasha Seized Power In Ottoman Egypt
The process of Muhammad Ali's seizure of power in Egypt was a long three-way civil war between the Ottoman Turks, Egyptian Mamluks who had ruled Egypt for centuries, and Albanian mercenaries in the service of the Ottomans. It ended in victory for the Albanians led by Muhammad Ali of Egypt (1769–1849).
The three-way struggle followed the French invasion of Egypt by Napoleon. After the French defea
-
Baro Bijav ko TRIVKO Belg Erdjan i ork Facebook HD 1
-
The Original Sunni Islam
FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted © material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyrig...
-
Mosaic News - 08/17/12: Scores Killed in Clashes Between Syrian Army and Free Army in Aleppo
Scores killed in clashes between Syrian Army and Free Army in Aleppo, Nasrallah vows to turns Israelis' lives into hell if Lebanon is attacked, Bahraini regi...
-
Identity Marks Of The Messiah by Myron "Mike" Perl a Completed Jew
Hebrew Christian Witness P.O. Box 2 San Bernardino, CA. 92402 http://www.hcwpearl.org rachel @ hcwperl.org From a Hopeless End to an Endless Hope Personal an...
Rivalry between Ariel Sharon around Ayoob Kara expulsion of Jews
The special film on the rivalry between Ariel Sharon around Ayoob Kara expulsion of Jews from Gush Katif Bloodshed, uncompromising rivalry did not like the c......
The special film on the rivalry between Ariel Sharon around Ayoob Kara expulsion of Jews from Gush Katif Bloodshed, uncompromising rivalry did not like the c...
wn.com/Rivalry Between Ariel Sharon Around Ayoob Kara Expulsion Of Jews
The special film on the rivalry between Ariel Sharon around Ayoob Kara expulsion of Jews from Gush Katif Bloodshed, uncompromising rivalry did not like the c...
The Russo-Turkish War Of 1877-78 - "93 Harbi"
The Russo-Turkish War of 1877--78 (Russian: Русско-турецкая война (1877--1878 гг.); Ottoman Turkish: ۹۳ حربی, Doksan Üç Harbi ('93 Harbi, "93 War"); Turkish: '9...
The Russo-Turkish War of 1877--78 (Russian: Русско-турецкая война (1877--1878 гг.); Ottoman Turkish: ۹۳ حربی, Doksan Üç Harbi ('93 Harbi, "93 War"); Turkish: '93 Harbi or 1877--78 Osmanlı-Rus Savaşı; Bulgarian: Руско-турска освободителна война (1877--1878 г.)) was a conflict between the Ottoman Empire and the Eastern Orthodox coalition led by the Russian Empire and composed of several Balkan countries. Fought in the Balkans and in the Caucasus, it originated in emerging 19th-century Balkan nationalism. Additional factors included Russian hopes of recovering territorial losses suffered during the Crimean War, re-establishing itself in the Black Sea, and supporting the political movement attempting to free Balkan nations from the Ottoman Empire.
As a result of the war, Russia succeeded in claiming several provinces in the Caucasus, namely Kars and Batumi. The principalities of Romania (which was also forced by Russia to cede the Budjak region of the Danube Delta, in spite of an existing treaty of alliance between the two countries), Serbia and Montenegro, each of which had had de facto sovereignty for some time, formally proclaimed independence from the Ottoman Empire.
According to the Treaty of San Stefano, 1878-03-03, the entire land populated by Bulgarian citizens were free. This included the territory from Danube to Rodopa mountains to the south and Macedonia to southwest. Three months later the Great Powers of Europe, England, France, Austro-Hungary and Russia, split the newly liberated country into three pieces, North, South and "Macedonia". After almost five centuries of Ottoman domination (1396--1878), the Bulgarian state was re-established as the Principality of Bulgaria, covering the land between the Danube River and the Balkan Mountains (except Northern Dobrudja which was given to Romania) as well as the region of Sofia, which became the new state's capital. The Congress of Berlin also allowed Austria-Hungary to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina and Great Britain to take over Cyprus. In 1885 the people of North and South Bulgaria rejected the Berlin Congress compromise and united.
Treatment of Christians in the Ottoman Empire
Article 9 of the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty, concluded at the end of the Crimean War, obliged the Ottoman Empire to grant Christians equal rights with Muslims. Before the treaty was signed, the Ottoman government issued an edict, Hatt-ı Hümayun, which proclaimed the principle of the equality of Muslims and non-Muslims, and produced some specific reforms to this end. For example, the jizya tax was abolished and non-Muslims were allowed to join the army.
However, some key aspects of dhimmi status were retained, including that the testimony of Christians against Muslims was not accepted in courts, which granted Muslims effective immunity for offenses conducted against Christians. Although local level relations between communities were often good, this practice encouraged exploitation. Abuses were at their worst in regions with a predominantly Christian population, where local authorities often openly supported abuse as a means to keep Christians subjugated.
Crisis in Lebanon, 1860
In 1858, the Maronite peasants, stirred by the clergy, revolted against their Maronite feudal overlords and established a peasant republic. In southern Lebanon, where Maronite peasants worked for Druze overlords, Druze peasants sided with their overlords against the Maronites, transforming the conflict into a civil war. Although both sides suffered, about 10,000 Maronites were massacred at the hands of the Druze.
Under the threat of European intervention, Ottoman authorities restored order. Nevertheless, French and British intervention followed. Under further European pressure, the Sultan agreed to appoint a Christian governor in Lebanon, whose candidacy was to be submitted by the Sultan and approved by the European powers.
On May 27, 1860 a group of Maronites raided a Druze village . Massacres and reprisal massacres followed, not only in the Lebanon but also in Syria. In the end, between 7,000 and 12,000 people of all religions , had been killed, and over 300 villages, 500 churches, 40 monasteries, and 30 schools were destroyed. Christian attacks on Muslims in Beirut stirred the Muslim population of Damascus to attack the Christian minority with between 5,000 and 25,000 of the latter being killed, including the American and Dutch consuls, giving the event an international dimension.
Ottoman foreign minister Fuat Pasha came to Syria and solved the problems by seeking out and executing the culprits, including the governor and other officials. Order was restored, and preparations made to give Lebanon new autonomy to avoid European intervention. Nevertheless, in September 1860 France sent a fleet, and Britain joined to prevent a unilateral intervention that could help increase French influence in the area at Britain's expense.
wn.com/The Russo Turkish War Of 1877 78 93 Harbi
The Russo-Turkish War of 1877--78 (Russian: Русско-турецкая война (1877--1878 гг.); Ottoman Turkish: ۹۳ حربی, Doksan Üç Harbi ('93 Harbi, "93 War"); Turkish: '93 Harbi or 1877--78 Osmanlı-Rus Savaşı; Bulgarian: Руско-турска освободителна война (1877--1878 г.)) was a conflict between the Ottoman Empire and the Eastern Orthodox coalition led by the Russian Empire and composed of several Balkan countries. Fought in the Balkans and in the Caucasus, it originated in emerging 19th-century Balkan nationalism. Additional factors included Russian hopes of recovering territorial losses suffered during the Crimean War, re-establishing itself in the Black Sea, and supporting the political movement attempting to free Balkan nations from the Ottoman Empire.
As a result of the war, Russia succeeded in claiming several provinces in the Caucasus, namely Kars and Batumi. The principalities of Romania (which was also forced by Russia to cede the Budjak region of the Danube Delta, in spite of an existing treaty of alliance between the two countries), Serbia and Montenegro, each of which had had de facto sovereignty for some time, formally proclaimed independence from the Ottoman Empire.
According to the Treaty of San Stefano, 1878-03-03, the entire land populated by Bulgarian citizens were free. This included the territory from Danube to Rodopa mountains to the south and Macedonia to southwest. Three months later the Great Powers of Europe, England, France, Austro-Hungary and Russia, split the newly liberated country into three pieces, North, South and "Macedonia". After almost five centuries of Ottoman domination (1396--1878), the Bulgarian state was re-established as the Principality of Bulgaria, covering the land between the Danube River and the Balkan Mountains (except Northern Dobrudja which was given to Romania) as well as the region of Sofia, which became the new state's capital. The Congress of Berlin also allowed Austria-Hungary to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina and Great Britain to take over Cyprus. In 1885 the people of North and South Bulgaria rejected the Berlin Congress compromise and united.
Treatment of Christians in the Ottoman Empire
Article 9 of the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty, concluded at the end of the Crimean War, obliged the Ottoman Empire to grant Christians equal rights with Muslims. Before the treaty was signed, the Ottoman government issued an edict, Hatt-ı Hümayun, which proclaimed the principle of the equality of Muslims and non-Muslims, and produced some specific reforms to this end. For example, the jizya tax was abolished and non-Muslims were allowed to join the army.
However, some key aspects of dhimmi status were retained, including that the testimony of Christians against Muslims was not accepted in courts, which granted Muslims effective immunity for offenses conducted against Christians. Although local level relations between communities were often good, this practice encouraged exploitation. Abuses were at their worst in regions with a predominantly Christian population, where local authorities often openly supported abuse as a means to keep Christians subjugated.
Crisis in Lebanon, 1860
In 1858, the Maronite peasants, stirred by the clergy, revolted against their Maronite feudal overlords and established a peasant republic. In southern Lebanon, where Maronite peasants worked for Druze overlords, Druze peasants sided with their overlords against the Maronites, transforming the conflict into a civil war. Although both sides suffered, about 10,000 Maronites were massacred at the hands of the Druze.
Under the threat of European intervention, Ottoman authorities restored order. Nevertheless, French and British intervention followed. Under further European pressure, the Sultan agreed to appoint a Christian governor in Lebanon, whose candidacy was to be submitted by the Sultan and approved by the European powers.
On May 27, 1860 a group of Maronites raided a Druze village . Massacres and reprisal massacres followed, not only in the Lebanon but also in Syria. In the end, between 7,000 and 12,000 people of all religions , had been killed, and over 300 villages, 500 churches, 40 monasteries, and 30 schools were destroyed. Christian attacks on Muslims in Beirut stirred the Muslim population of Damascus to attack the Christian minority with between 5,000 and 25,000 of the latter being killed, including the American and Dutch consuls, giving the event an international dimension.
Ottoman foreign minister Fuat Pasha came to Syria and solved the problems by seeking out and executing the culprits, including the governor and other officials. Order was restored, and preparations made to give Lebanon new autonomy to avoid European intervention. Nevertheless, in September 1860 France sent a fleet, and Britain joined to prevent a unilateral intervention that could help increase French influence in the area at Britain's expense.
- published: 11 May 2015
- views: 0
The Extraordinary Life of an Adventurer, Adviser to Kings, Ally of Lawrence of Arabia (1997)
Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell, CBE (14 July 1868 -- 12 July 1926) was an English writer, traveller, political officer, administrator, archaeologist and spy......
Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell, CBE (14 July 1868 -- 12 July 1926) was an English writer, traveller, political officer, administrator, archaeologist and spy...
wn.com/The Extraordinary Life Of An Adventurer, Adviser To Kings, Ally Of Lawrence Of Arabia (1997)
Gertrude Margaret Lowthian Bell, CBE (14 July 1868 -- 12 July 1926) was an English writer, traveller, political officer, administrator, archaeologist and spy...
Ottoman Legacy: Modern Middle East
The Middle East (also Mid-East in US usage) is a region that roughly encompasses a majority of Western Asia (excluding the Caucasus) and Egypt. The term is u......
The Middle East (also Mid-East in US usage) is a region that roughly encompasses a majority of Western Asia (excluding the Caucasus) and Egypt. The term is u...
wn.com/Ottoman Legacy Modern Middle East
The Middle East (also Mid-East in US usage) is a region that roughly encompasses a majority of Western Asia (excluding the Caucasus) and Egypt. The term is u...
Who Are The Alawites?
The Alawites, also known as Alawis (ʿAlawīyyah Arabic: علوية), are a prominent religious group, centred in Syria, who follow a branch of the Twelver school of ...
The Alawites, also known as Alawis (ʿAlawīyyah Arabic: علوية), are a prominent religious group, centred in Syria, who follow a branch of the Twelver school of Shia Islam but with syncretistic elements. Alawites revere Ali (Ali ibn Abi Talib), and the name "Alawi" means followers of Ali. The sect is believed to have been founded by Ibn Nusayr during the 9th century. For this reason, Alawites are sometimes called "Nusayris" (Nuṣayrī Arabic: نصيرية), though this term has come to have derogatory connotations in the modern era; another name, "Ansari" (al-Anṣāriyyah), is believed to be a mistransliteration of "Nusayri". Today, Alawites represent 12 percent of the Syrian population and are a significant minority in Turkey and northern Lebanon. There is also a population living in the village of Ghajar in the occupied Golan Heights. They are often confused with the Alevis of Turkey, another Shia sect. Alawites form the dominant religious group on the Syrian coast and towns near the coast which are also inhabited by Sunnis, Christians, and Ismailis.
Alawites have historically kept their beliefs secret from outsiders and non-initiated Alawites, so rumours about them have arisen. Arabic accounts of their beliefs tend to be partisan (either positively or negatively). However, since the early 2000s, Western scholarship on the Alawite religion has made significant advances. At the core of Alawite belief is a divine triad, comprising three aspects of the one God. These aspects or emanations appear cyclically in human form throughout history. The last emanations of the divine triad, according to Alawite belief, were as Ali, Muhammad and Salman the Persian. Alawites were historically persecuted for these beliefs by the Sunni Muslim rulers of the area.
The establishment of the French Mandate of Syria marked a turning point in Alawi history. It gave the French the power to recruit Syrian civilians into their armed forces for an indefinite period and created exclusive areas for minorities, including an Alawite State. The Alawite State was later dismantled, but the Alawites continued to be a significant part of the Syrian army. Since Hafez al-Assad took power in 1970, the government has been dominated by a political elite led by the Alawite Al-Assad family. During the Islamic uprising in Syria in the 1970s and 1980s the establishment came under pressure, and the conflict continues as part of the Syrian civil war.
The Alawites take their name from Ali ibn Abi Talib, cousin, son-in-law and first male follower of Muhammad] who is considered by Shia Muslims the first Shia Imam and the fourth Rashidun (Rightly-Guided Caliph) by Sunni Muslims. French occupying forces used the term Alaouites, a transliteration into French.
In older sources, Alawis are often called Ansaris. According to Samuel Lyde, who lived among the Alawites during the mid-19th century, this was a term they used among themselves. Other sources indicate that "Ansari" is simply a Western error in the transliteration of "Nosairi". However, the term "Nusayri" had fallen out of currency by the 1920s, as a movement led by intellectuals within the community during the French Mandate sought to replace it with the modern term "Alawi". They characterised the older name (which implied "a separate ethnic and religious identity") as an "invention of the sect's enemies", ostensibly favouring an emphasis on "connection with mainstream Islam"—particularly the Shia branch. As such, "Nusayri" is now generally regarded as antiquated, and has even come to have insulting and abusive connotations. The term is frequently employed as hate speech by Sunni fundamentalists fighting against Bashar al-Assad's government in the Syrian civil war, who use its emphasis on Ibn Nusayr in order to insinuate that Alawi beliefs are "man-made" and not divinely inspired. Recent research has shown that the Alawi appellation was used by the sect’s adherents since the 11th century. The following quote from Alkan (2012) illustrates this point: “In actual fact, the name ‘Alawī’ appears as early as in an 11 th-century Nuṣayrī tract (…). Moreover, the term ‘Alawī’ was already used at the beginning of the 20th century. In 1903 the Belgian-born Jesuit and Orientalist Henri Lammens (d. 1937) visited a certain Ḥaydarī-Nuṣayrī sheikh Abdullah in a village near Antakya and mentions that the latter preferred the name ‘Alawī’ for his people. Lastly, it is interesting to note that in the above-mentioned petitions of 1892 and 1909 the Nuṣayrīs called themselves the ‘Arab Alawī people’ (ʿArab ʿAlevī ṭāʾifesi) 'our ʿAlawī Nuṣayrī people’ (ṭāʾifatunā al-Nuṣayriyya al-ʿAlawiyya) or ‘signed with Alawī people’ (ʿAlevī ṭāʾifesi imżāsıyla). This early self-designation is, in my opinion, of triple importance.
wn.com/Who Are The Alawites
The Alawites, also known as Alawis (ʿAlawīyyah Arabic: علوية), are a prominent religious group, centred in Syria, who follow a branch of the Twelver school of Shia Islam but with syncretistic elements. Alawites revere Ali (Ali ibn Abi Talib), and the name "Alawi" means followers of Ali. The sect is believed to have been founded by Ibn Nusayr during the 9th century. For this reason, Alawites are sometimes called "Nusayris" (Nuṣayrī Arabic: نصيرية), though this term has come to have derogatory connotations in the modern era; another name, "Ansari" (al-Anṣāriyyah), is believed to be a mistransliteration of "Nusayri". Today, Alawites represent 12 percent of the Syrian population and are a significant minority in Turkey and northern Lebanon. There is also a population living in the village of Ghajar in the occupied Golan Heights. They are often confused with the Alevis of Turkey, another Shia sect. Alawites form the dominant religious group on the Syrian coast and towns near the coast which are also inhabited by Sunnis, Christians, and Ismailis.
Alawites have historically kept their beliefs secret from outsiders and non-initiated Alawites, so rumours about them have arisen. Arabic accounts of their beliefs tend to be partisan (either positively or negatively). However, since the early 2000s, Western scholarship on the Alawite religion has made significant advances. At the core of Alawite belief is a divine triad, comprising three aspects of the one God. These aspects or emanations appear cyclically in human form throughout history. The last emanations of the divine triad, according to Alawite belief, were as Ali, Muhammad and Salman the Persian. Alawites were historically persecuted for these beliefs by the Sunni Muslim rulers of the area.
The establishment of the French Mandate of Syria marked a turning point in Alawi history. It gave the French the power to recruit Syrian civilians into their armed forces for an indefinite period and created exclusive areas for minorities, including an Alawite State. The Alawite State was later dismantled, but the Alawites continued to be a significant part of the Syrian army. Since Hafez al-Assad took power in 1970, the government has been dominated by a political elite led by the Alawite Al-Assad family. During the Islamic uprising in Syria in the 1970s and 1980s the establishment came under pressure, and the conflict continues as part of the Syrian civil war.
The Alawites take their name from Ali ibn Abi Talib, cousin, son-in-law and first male follower of Muhammad] who is considered by Shia Muslims the first Shia Imam and the fourth Rashidun (Rightly-Guided Caliph) by Sunni Muslims. French occupying forces used the term Alaouites, a transliteration into French.
In older sources, Alawis are often called Ansaris. According to Samuel Lyde, who lived among the Alawites during the mid-19th century, this was a term they used among themselves. Other sources indicate that "Ansari" is simply a Western error in the transliteration of "Nosairi". However, the term "Nusayri" had fallen out of currency by the 1920s, as a movement led by intellectuals within the community during the French Mandate sought to replace it with the modern term "Alawi". They characterised the older name (which implied "a separate ethnic and religious identity") as an "invention of the sect's enemies", ostensibly favouring an emphasis on "connection with mainstream Islam"—particularly the Shia branch. As such, "Nusayri" is now generally regarded as antiquated, and has even come to have insulting and abusive connotations. The term is frequently employed as hate speech by Sunni fundamentalists fighting against Bashar al-Assad's government in the Syrian civil war, who use its emphasis on Ibn Nusayr in order to insinuate that Alawi beliefs are "man-made" and not divinely inspired. Recent research has shown that the Alawi appellation was used by the sect’s adherents since the 11th century. The following quote from Alkan (2012) illustrates this point: “In actual fact, the name ‘Alawī’ appears as early as in an 11 th-century Nuṣayrī tract (…). Moreover, the term ‘Alawī’ was already used at the beginning of the 20th century. In 1903 the Belgian-born Jesuit and Orientalist Henri Lammens (d. 1937) visited a certain Ḥaydarī-Nuṣayrī sheikh Abdullah in a village near Antakya and mentions that the latter preferred the name ‘Alawī’ for his people. Lastly, it is interesting to note that in the above-mentioned petitions of 1892 and 1909 the Nuṣayrīs called themselves the ‘Arab Alawī people’ (ʿArab ʿAlevī ṭāʾifesi) 'our ʿAlawī Nuṣayrī people’ (ṭāʾifatunā al-Nuṣayriyya al-ʿAlawiyya) or ‘signed with Alawī people’ (ʿAlevī ṭāʾifesi imżāsıyla). This early self-designation is, in my opinion, of triple importance.
- published: 09 Apr 2015
- views: 1
3. A Critique of Ibn Taymiyyah & Extremism - Maulana Syed Muhammad Baqir Qazwini
MP3: https://s3.amazonaws.com/JCC/Muharram/1436/3rdNightMuharram1436_Qazwini_2014-10-27_200418705.mp3
3rd Night Muharram 1436
Recited By: Maulana Syed Muhammad...
MP3: https://s3.amazonaws.com/JCC/Muharram/1436/3rdNightMuharram1436_Qazwini_2014-10-27_200418705.mp3
3rd Night Muharram 1436
Recited By: Maulana Syed Muhammad Baqir Qazwini
Date: October 27th, 2014
www.facebook.com/IslamiCentre.org
www.islamicentre.org
wn.com/3. A Critique Of Ibn Taymiyyah Extremism Maulana Syed Muhammad Baqir Qazwini
MP3: https://s3.amazonaws.com/JCC/Muharram/1436/3rdNightMuharram1436_Qazwini_2014-10-27_200418705.mp3
3rd Night Muharram 1436
Recited By: Maulana Syed Muhammad Baqir Qazwini
Date: October 27th, 2014
www.facebook.com/IslamiCentre.org
www.islamicentre.org
- published: 28 Oct 2014
- views: 256
How Muhammad Ali Pasha Seized Power In Ottoman Egypt
The process of Muhammad Ali's seizure of power in Egypt was a long three-way civil war between the Ottoman Turks, Egyptian Mamluks who had ruled Egypt for centu...
The process of Muhammad Ali's seizure of power in Egypt was a long three-way civil war between the Ottoman Turks, Egyptian Mamluks who had ruled Egypt for centuries, and Albanian mercenaries in the service of the Ottomans. It ended in victory for the Albanians led by Muhammad Ali of Egypt (1769–1849).
The three-way struggle followed the French invasion of Egypt by Napoleon. After the French defeat by the British a power vacuum was created in Egypt. The Mamelukes had governed Egypt before the French invasion and still retained much power. Egypt was officially a part of the Ottoman Empire and Egypt still had many Ottoman Turkish troops who had been sent to evict the French. Many of the best Ottoman troops were from Albania, then a province of the Ottoman Empire.
Albanians under Tahir rise and seize Cairo from Hüsrev Pasha
In March 1803, the British evacuated Alexandria leaving a power vacuum in Egypt. Muhammad Bey al-Alfi (aka Alfi Bey) (1751–1807) had accompanied the British to lobby them to help restore the power of the Mamelukes. In their attempts to return to power, the Mamelukes took Minia and interrupted communication between Upper and Lower Egypt.
About six weeks later, the Ottoman governor of Egypt Koca Hüsrev Mehmed Pasha, finding himself in a financial bind and unable to pay all the troops under his command, attempted to disband his Albanian bashi-bazouks (or Arnauts) without pay in order to be able to pay his regular, Turkish, soldiers. The Albanians refused to disband, and instead surrounded the house of the defterdar (finance minister), who appealed in vain to Hüsrev Pasha to satisfy their claims. Instead, the Pasha commenced an artillery bombardment from batteries located in and near his palace on the insurgent soldiers who had taken the house of the defterdar, located in the Ezbekia. The citizens of Cairo, accustomed to such occurrences, immediately closed their shops and armed themselves. The tumult in the city continued all day, and the next morning a body of troops sent out by Hüsrev Pasha failed to quell it.
The Albanian commander Tahir Pasha then repaired to the citadel, gaining admittance through an embrasure, and from there began a counter bombardment of the pasha's forces over the roofs of the intervening houses. Soon thereafter, Tahir descended with his guns to the Ezbekia and then laid close siege to the governor's palace. The following day, Koca Hüsrev Mehmed Pasha fled with his women, servants, and regular troops to Damietta along the Nile.
Tahir then assumed the government, but within twenty three days encountered trouble due to inability to pay all of his forces. This time, it was Turkish troops who went without pay, and they in turn mutinied and assassinated Tahir Pasha. During the course of the mutiny, the governor's palace was burnt and plundered. A desperate, prolonged, and confusing conflict then ensued between the Albanians and Turks, with the divided Mameluks oscillating between the two factions or attempting to regain power on their own behalf.
Muhammad Ali assumes control and captures Ahmed Pasha
Tahir was replaced as commander of the Albanians by Muhammad Ali, one of the regimental commanders. Fearing for his position from the Ottomans, he entered into an alliance with the Mameluke leaders Ibrahim Bey and Osman Bey al-Bardisi.
With Hüsrev Pasha fortifying himself at Damietta, the Turkish troops in the vicinity of Cairo acclaimed Muftizade Ahmed Pasha, the Ottoman mayor of Medina (and previously Damietta), as their new governor. Muhammad Ali, however, refused to surrender Cairo to him. In reordering his forces to meet the new threat, he also removed the Mamelukes from Giza, where they had been invited by his predecessor, Tahir.
Muftizade Ahmed Pasha established himself at the mosque of al-Zflhir, which the French had converted into a fortress, but was eventually cornered and besieged by Muhammad Ali and his Albanian troops in the Cairo citadel, and compelled to surrender. Among the prisoners, those of the Turkish troops who had been involved in the assassination of the former Albanian commander, Tahir Pasha, were put to death.
Capture of Hüsrev and Damietta
Muhammad Ali gave control over the Cairo citadel to his Mameluke allies. Soon after, they marched against Hüsrev Pasha, who had been joined by a considerable number of Turks in a well-fortified position at Damietta. Hüsrev was defeated, captured, and brought to Cairo by the Albanians. The bashi-bazouks sacked Damietta, but Hüsrev was treated with respect.
Trabluslu Ali Pasha attempts to regain control
wn.com/How Muhammad Ali Pasha Seized Power In Ottoman Egypt
The process of Muhammad Ali's seizure of power in Egypt was a long three-way civil war between the Ottoman Turks, Egyptian Mamluks who had ruled Egypt for centuries, and Albanian mercenaries in the service of the Ottomans. It ended in victory for the Albanians led by Muhammad Ali of Egypt (1769–1849).
The three-way struggle followed the French invasion of Egypt by Napoleon. After the French defeat by the British a power vacuum was created in Egypt. The Mamelukes had governed Egypt before the French invasion and still retained much power. Egypt was officially a part of the Ottoman Empire and Egypt still had many Ottoman Turkish troops who had been sent to evict the French. Many of the best Ottoman troops were from Albania, then a province of the Ottoman Empire.
Albanians under Tahir rise and seize Cairo from Hüsrev Pasha
In March 1803, the British evacuated Alexandria leaving a power vacuum in Egypt. Muhammad Bey al-Alfi (aka Alfi Bey) (1751–1807) had accompanied the British to lobby them to help restore the power of the Mamelukes. In their attempts to return to power, the Mamelukes took Minia and interrupted communication between Upper and Lower Egypt.
About six weeks later, the Ottoman governor of Egypt Koca Hüsrev Mehmed Pasha, finding himself in a financial bind and unable to pay all the troops under his command, attempted to disband his Albanian bashi-bazouks (or Arnauts) without pay in order to be able to pay his regular, Turkish, soldiers. The Albanians refused to disband, and instead surrounded the house of the defterdar (finance minister), who appealed in vain to Hüsrev Pasha to satisfy their claims. Instead, the Pasha commenced an artillery bombardment from batteries located in and near his palace on the insurgent soldiers who had taken the house of the defterdar, located in the Ezbekia. The citizens of Cairo, accustomed to such occurrences, immediately closed their shops and armed themselves. The tumult in the city continued all day, and the next morning a body of troops sent out by Hüsrev Pasha failed to quell it.
The Albanian commander Tahir Pasha then repaired to the citadel, gaining admittance through an embrasure, and from there began a counter bombardment of the pasha's forces over the roofs of the intervening houses. Soon thereafter, Tahir descended with his guns to the Ezbekia and then laid close siege to the governor's palace. The following day, Koca Hüsrev Mehmed Pasha fled with his women, servants, and regular troops to Damietta along the Nile.
Tahir then assumed the government, but within twenty three days encountered trouble due to inability to pay all of his forces. This time, it was Turkish troops who went without pay, and they in turn mutinied and assassinated Tahir Pasha. During the course of the mutiny, the governor's palace was burnt and plundered. A desperate, prolonged, and confusing conflict then ensued between the Albanians and Turks, with the divided Mameluks oscillating between the two factions or attempting to regain power on their own behalf.
Muhammad Ali assumes control and captures Ahmed Pasha
Tahir was replaced as commander of the Albanians by Muhammad Ali, one of the regimental commanders. Fearing for his position from the Ottomans, he entered into an alliance with the Mameluke leaders Ibrahim Bey and Osman Bey al-Bardisi.
With Hüsrev Pasha fortifying himself at Damietta, the Turkish troops in the vicinity of Cairo acclaimed Muftizade Ahmed Pasha, the Ottoman mayor of Medina (and previously Damietta), as their new governor. Muhammad Ali, however, refused to surrender Cairo to him. In reordering his forces to meet the new threat, he also removed the Mamelukes from Giza, where they had been invited by his predecessor, Tahir.
Muftizade Ahmed Pasha established himself at the mosque of al-Zflhir, which the French had converted into a fortress, but was eventually cornered and besieged by Muhammad Ali and his Albanian troops in the Cairo citadel, and compelled to surrender. Among the prisoners, those of the Turkish troops who had been involved in the assassination of the former Albanian commander, Tahir Pasha, were put to death.
Capture of Hüsrev and Damietta
Muhammad Ali gave control over the Cairo citadel to his Mameluke allies. Soon after, they marched against Hüsrev Pasha, who had been joined by a considerable number of Turks in a well-fortified position at Damietta. Hüsrev was defeated, captured, and brought to Cairo by the Albanians. The bashi-bazouks sacked Damietta, but Hüsrev was treated with respect.
Trabluslu Ali Pasha attempts to regain control
- published: 22 May 2015
- views: 0
The Original Sunni Islam
FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted © material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyrig......
FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted © material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyrig...
wn.com/The Original Sunni Islam
FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted © material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyrig...
Mosaic News - 08/17/12: Scores Killed in Clashes Between Syrian Army and Free Army in Aleppo
Scores killed in clashes between Syrian Army and Free Army in Aleppo, Nasrallah vows to turns Israelis' lives into hell if Lebanon is attacked, Bahraini regi......
Scores killed in clashes between Syrian Army and Free Army in Aleppo, Nasrallah vows to turns Israelis' lives into hell if Lebanon is attacked, Bahraini regi...
wn.com/Mosaic News 08 17 12 Scores Killed In Clashes Between Syrian Army And Free Army In Aleppo
Scores killed in clashes between Syrian Army and Free Army in Aleppo, Nasrallah vows to turns Israelis' lives into hell if Lebanon is attacked, Bahraini regi...
- published: 19 Aug 2012
- views: 1578
-
author: Link TV
Identity Marks Of The Messiah by Myron "Mike" Perl a Completed Jew
Hebrew Christian Witness P.O. Box 2 San Bernardino, CA. 92402 http://www.hcwpearl.org rachel @ hcwperl.org From a Hopeless End to an Endless Hope Personal an......
Hebrew Christian Witness P.O. Box 2 San Bernardino, CA. 92402 http://www.hcwpearl.org rachel @ hcwperl.org From a Hopeless End to an Endless Hope Personal an...
wn.com/Identity Marks Of The Messiah By Myron Mike Perl A Completed Jew
Hebrew Christian Witness P.O. Box 2 San Bernardino, CA. 92402 http://www.hcwpearl.org rachel @ hcwperl.org From a Hopeless End to an Endless Hope Personal an...
- published: 24 Feb 2011
- views: 392
-
author: Dave Flang