-
Semi-Presidential France
Quick Explanation of the Semi-Presidential System of Government in France and the difference between it and the US presidential system and the UK Parliamentary system.
https://Instagram.com/TodayAmazing
https://Twitter.com/TodayAmazing
https://TodayAmazing.Tumblr.com
-
Political systems: parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential
Political systems such as parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential.
-
Semi-presidential system
The semi-presidential system (referred to as semi-presidentialism) is a system of government in which a popularly elected fixed term president exists alongside a prime minister and Cabinet who are responsible to the legislature of a state. It differs from a parliamentary republic in that it has a popularly elected head of state who is more than a purely ceremonial figurehead, and from the presiden
-
France political system
An overview of the political system of the Republic of France.
-
Presidential and semi presidential
Presidential and semi presidential
-
Turkish President Erdoğan says UK is semi-presidency dominated by Queen
Refusing to remain silent on insisting on the need to scrap Turkey’s parliamentary system, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has given clues to his favorite semi-presidency model.
Erdoğan also called on citizens to vote in favor of “a new constitution” in upcoming parliamentary elections.
“In my opinion, Britain is a semi-presidency. The predominant constituent is the queen,” Erdoğan said l
-
سلطنة عُمان - البرتغال
-
Presidential system tops AKP’s election campaign
A new constitution and the adoption of a presidential system are the two major goals of the ruling party in its pre-election campaign, a senior Justice and Development Party (AKP) has said, suggesting that France’s semi-presidential system was the most appropriate for Turkey.
“In my opinion, a semi-presidential system is the most convenient one for Turkey. In the elections, people vote for those
-
Presidential Republics and Parliamentary Democracies
I explain the differences between Presidential Republics and Parliamentary Democracies.
-
Parliamentary vs Presidential
SS6CG4 The student will compare and contrast various forms of government. c. Describe the two predominant forms of democratic governments: parliamentary and ...
-
Danze proze semi-prezidansyel Ramgoolam ek Berenger
Manb LALIT Ram Seegobin explik linportans eleksyon 2014 ki pe vini. Li expoz danze proze sistem semi-prezidansyel Ramgoolam ek Berenger. Li osi expoz kimanyer koalisyon PT-MMM ena baking klas kapitalist. Li explik mo-dord LALIT fas a sa danze-la. Pu plis detay, chek nu websayt: www.lalitmauritius.org
-
Difficulty of French Model in Nepal: Dangers of cohabitation - Part 1
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin...
-
Difficulty of French Model in Nepal: Dangers of cohabitation - Part 2
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin...
-
Turkish-style presidential system needed, Erdoğan repeats
Unlike what many argue, establishing an authentic Turkish-style presidential system is both possible and necessary, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has stressed, underlining that presidential systems in different countries around the world vary in form.
“It is being said: ‘A Turkish-type presidential system is not possible.’ I am saying it loud and clear: It is possible, pure and simple. Why would
-
Ukrainians in Kuwait vote in snap parliamentary elections at embassy polling station
Ukrainian voters headed to the polls in snap elections for a new parliament that is set to play a bigger role in the country, following the shift of power in Ukraine's semi-presidential system in February, 2014.
President Petro Poroshenko called the poll, which he described as an historic chance to set the country back on the pro-Western path.
The Ukrainian Embassy in Kuwait also opened a polling
-
Some KMT members question timing, motives of Eric Chu’s proposed reforms
New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu’s call for reform has sparked debate within the KMT. While some party members suggest that the time for constitutional reform may not be right, Chu insists that his preferred reforms could make the government more accountable to the people. When Chu announced last week that he was running to become KMT chairman, he also said he wished for a parliamentary system of governm
-
French Fifth Republic
The Fifth Republic is the fifth and current republican constitution of France, introduced on 4 October 1958. The Fifth Republic emerged from the collapse of the French Fourth Republic, replacing the prior parliamentary government with a semi-presidential system. It is France's third-longest-enduring political regime, after the pre-revolutionary Ancien Régime and the Third Republic.
This video is
-
Another Semi Presidential Book Pickup! + TTM's + eBay!
Check it out guys. Let me know what you think.
-
Primary Elections Explained
Help support videos like this: http://www.cgpgrey.com/subbable *T-Shirts now for sale!* Help support making videos: http://goo.gl/1Wlnd Grey's blog: http://w...
-
อ.วันชัย พรหมภา : ร่วมกันสร้างชาติด้วยหลักวิชาที่ถูกต้อง
"ระบบรัฐสภา" (Parliamentary System) หมายถึง สภาผู้แทนราษฎร (House of Representatives) เป็น "สถาบันหลักทางการเมือง" หรือ เป็น "ผู้ถือดุล" ทางการเมือง เป็นระบบ (Fusion of Powers)
"ระบบประธานาธิบดี" (Presidential System) หมายถึง ประธานาธิบดี (President) เป็นสถาบัน หลักทางการเมือง หรือเป็นผู้ถือดุลทางการเมือง
"ระบบกึ่งประธานาธิบดี" (Semi-Presidential System) หมายถึง เป็นระบบกึ่งแยกอำนาจ (Semi-Separati
-
سلطنة عُمان - أوكرانيا
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. Ukraine borders the Russian Federation to the east and northeast, Belarus to the northwest, Poland, Slovakia and Hung...
-
Oppostition party′s floor leader seeks referendum on constitutional revision dur
Back here in the nation... constitutional reform... once a hot presidential election topic... has faded a bit due to overshadowing concerns over the economy and security issues.
But the opposition camp wants to revive the issue and it has set its own deadline to bring about reform.
Lee Ji-yoon has more.
Let the public decide whether or not Korea needs an amended constitution.
That′s what the main
-
De facto presidential system in Turkey in effect despite PM
Four newspapers had almost identical headlines yesterday in Turkey: The Jan. 19 cabinet meeting presided over by President Tayyip Erdoğan was the “First step toward a presidential system” in Turkey.
In fact, it isn't fair to describe those four papers - namely Sabah, Yeni Şafak, Star and Akşam - as “pro-government” any longer, because they have all started to make a distinction between Prime Mini
Semi-Presidential France
Quick Explanation of the Semi-Presidential System of Government in France and the difference between it and the US presidential system and the UK Parliamentary ...
Quick Explanation of the Semi-Presidential System of Government in France and the difference between it and the US presidential system and the UK Parliamentary system.
https://Instagram.com/TodayAmazing
https://Twitter.com/TodayAmazing
https://TodayAmazing.Tumblr.com
wn.com/Semi Presidential France
Quick Explanation of the Semi-Presidential System of Government in France and the difference between it and the US presidential system and the UK Parliamentary system.
https://Instagram.com/TodayAmazing
https://Twitter.com/TodayAmazing
https://TodayAmazing.Tumblr.com
- published: 09 Jul 2015
- views: 13
Political systems: parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential
Political systems such as parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential....
Political systems such as parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential.
wn.com/Political Systems Parliamentary, Presidential And Semi Presidential
Political systems such as parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential.
Semi-presidential system
The semi-presidential system (referred to as semi-presidentialism) is a system of government in which a popularly elected fixed term president exists alongside ...
The semi-presidential system (referred to as semi-presidentialism) is a system of government in which a popularly elected fixed term president exists alongside a prime minister and Cabinet who are responsible to the legislature of a state. It differs from a parliamentary republic in that it has a popularly elected head of state who is more than a purely ceremonial figurehead, and from the presidential system in that the cabinet, although named by the president, is responsible to the legislature, which may force the cabinet to resign through a motion of no confidence.
While the Weimar Republic (1919–1933) was the one of the earliest examples of a semi-presidential system, the term was first used in a 1978 work by political scientist Maurice Duverger to describe the then relatively-new French Fifth Republic, which he dubbed a régime semi-présidentiel.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Semi Presidential System
The semi-presidential system (referred to as semi-presidentialism) is a system of government in which a popularly elected fixed term president exists alongside a prime minister and Cabinet who are responsible to the legislature of a state. It differs from a parliamentary republic in that it has a popularly elected head of state who is more than a purely ceremonial figurehead, and from the presidential system in that the cabinet, although named by the president, is responsible to the legislature, which may force the cabinet to resign through a motion of no confidence.
While the Weimar Republic (1919–1933) was the one of the earliest examples of a semi-presidential system, the term was first used in a 1978 work by political scientist Maurice Duverger to describe the then relatively-new French Fifth Republic, which he dubbed a régime semi-présidentiel.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 30 Oct 2014
- views: 0
France political system
An overview of the political system of the Republic of France....
An overview of the political system of the Republic of France.
wn.com/France Political System
An overview of the political system of the Republic of France.
Presidential and semi presidential
Presidential and semi presidential...
Presidential and semi presidential
wn.com/Presidential And Semi Presidential
Presidential and semi presidential
- published: 10 Sep 2014
- views: 1
Turkish President Erdoğan says UK is semi-presidency dominated by Queen
Refusing to remain silent on insisting on the need to scrap Turkey’s parliamentary system, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has given clues to his favorit...
Refusing to remain silent on insisting on the need to scrap Turkey’s parliamentary system, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has given clues to his favorite semi-presidency model.
Erdoğan also called on citizens to vote in favor of “a new constitution” in upcoming parliamentary elections.
“In my opinion, Britain is a semi-presidency. The predominant constituent is the queen,” Erdoğan said late Jan. 29, in a bid to justify his aspirations for a systemic change in Turkey, suggesting that the United Kingdom was run as a semi-presidential system in which the will of the queen is dominant.
His comments on the largely ceremonial monarchical system in the U.K. and its hereditary monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, came after he was reminded of opposition criticism that he actually wants to be a “sultan” through the presidential system.
“Look, is there a ‘padishah system’ in America at the moment? When it is America, it is not a padishah system; when it is Brazil, it is not a padishah system; when it is South Korea, it is not a padishah system, when it is Mexico, it is not a padishah system. I mean, why is it only a padishah system when an idea like this is floated in Turkey?” Erdoğan said during a live interview on public broadcaster TRT Haber.
“For example, the prime minister takes charge, let’s say, as the first vice president, but not as the prime minister,” he said, while also elaborating on what he has in mind as a prospective presidential system.
The day after delivering the comments, Erdoğan urged people to prioritize the drafting of a new constitution by the next government when they vote in parliamentary elections in June.
“We are working with love for our nation,” Erdoğan said Jan. 30 in the Central Anatolian province of Kırşehir where he addressed people on the occasion of a collective opening ceremony for various facilities.
“This year is an important year. There is an election on June 7,” Erdoğan said as he underlined that the election was particularly important for fulfilling the goals set for 2023, the centennial anniversary of the foundation of the Republic of Turkey.
“There is one thing which has been left half-finished, that we haven’t been able to achieve: a new constitution,” he said, referring to the fact that a parliamentary panel tasked with drafting the country’s first civilian constitution was officially dissolved in late 2013 after nearly two years of futile work.
“You should fairly manifest your will for the ‘New Turkey and the new constitution.’ I believe that just like how a strong will emerged in the presidential election [in August 2014], the required stance will be displayed on June 7 too. You will manifest the power which will found the new constitution and you will lay the foundation for the New Turkey,” he said.
Accused by critics of suppressing checks to his power in the judiciary and media, Erdoğan said this week that the question of constitutional change to cement the presidency should be a central issue in polls to be held by early June.
“The biggest advantage ... would be in abolishing policy-making through multiple channels,” he said, denouncing the “cacophony” that he said slowed down decision-making at the moment.
The president’s opponents say power has become too centralized in Turkey and the atmosphere poisoned by accusations of graft and purges against perceived enemies in the police and the judiciary.
This week, a senior Justice and Development Party (AKP) executive said a new constitution and the adoption of a presidential system are the two major goals of the ruling party in its pre-election campaign, while also arguing that France’s semi-presidential system was the most appropriate for Turkey.
“In my opinion, a semi-presidential system is the most convenient one for Turkey. In the elections, people vote for those who they want to see as its rulers. That is, they don’t reward political parties they want to punish at polls as coalition partners,” said Mustafa Şentop, the deputy leader of AKP responsible for the election as well as the presidential system. Şentop is a constitutional law professor and is known as the architect of the AKP’s works on presidential system.
On the same day when Şentop’s remarks were delivered, some newspapers reported on Jan. 29 the presidential system would be the top highlight of the AKP’s election declaration.
On the same day, however, AKP Deputy Chair Beşir Atalay refuted the reports, saying the study on election declaration was not yet finalized.
wn.com/Turkish President Erdoğan Says UK Is Semi Presidency Dominated By Queen
Refusing to remain silent on insisting on the need to scrap Turkey’s parliamentary system, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has given clues to his favorite semi-presidency model.
Erdoğan also called on citizens to vote in favor of “a new constitution” in upcoming parliamentary elections.
“In my opinion, Britain is a semi-presidency. The predominant constituent is the queen,” Erdoğan said late Jan. 29, in a bid to justify his aspirations for a systemic change in Turkey, suggesting that the United Kingdom was run as a semi-presidential system in which the will of the queen is dominant.
His comments on the largely ceremonial monarchical system in the U.K. and its hereditary monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, came after he was reminded of opposition criticism that he actually wants to be a “sultan” through the presidential system.
“Look, is there a ‘padishah system’ in America at the moment? When it is America, it is not a padishah system; when it is Brazil, it is not a padishah system; when it is South Korea, it is not a padishah system, when it is Mexico, it is not a padishah system. I mean, why is it only a padishah system when an idea like this is floated in Turkey?” Erdoğan said during a live interview on public broadcaster TRT Haber.
“For example, the prime minister takes charge, let’s say, as the first vice president, but not as the prime minister,” he said, while also elaborating on what he has in mind as a prospective presidential system.
The day after delivering the comments, Erdoğan urged people to prioritize the drafting of a new constitution by the next government when they vote in parliamentary elections in June.
“We are working with love for our nation,” Erdoğan said Jan. 30 in the Central Anatolian province of Kırşehir where he addressed people on the occasion of a collective opening ceremony for various facilities.
“This year is an important year. There is an election on June 7,” Erdoğan said as he underlined that the election was particularly important for fulfilling the goals set for 2023, the centennial anniversary of the foundation of the Republic of Turkey.
“There is one thing which has been left half-finished, that we haven’t been able to achieve: a new constitution,” he said, referring to the fact that a parliamentary panel tasked with drafting the country’s first civilian constitution was officially dissolved in late 2013 after nearly two years of futile work.
“You should fairly manifest your will for the ‘New Turkey and the new constitution.’ I believe that just like how a strong will emerged in the presidential election [in August 2014], the required stance will be displayed on June 7 too. You will manifest the power which will found the new constitution and you will lay the foundation for the New Turkey,” he said.
Accused by critics of suppressing checks to his power in the judiciary and media, Erdoğan said this week that the question of constitutional change to cement the presidency should be a central issue in polls to be held by early June.
“The biggest advantage ... would be in abolishing policy-making through multiple channels,” he said, denouncing the “cacophony” that he said slowed down decision-making at the moment.
The president’s opponents say power has become too centralized in Turkey and the atmosphere poisoned by accusations of graft and purges against perceived enemies in the police and the judiciary.
This week, a senior Justice and Development Party (AKP) executive said a new constitution and the adoption of a presidential system are the two major goals of the ruling party in its pre-election campaign, while also arguing that France’s semi-presidential system was the most appropriate for Turkey.
“In my opinion, a semi-presidential system is the most convenient one for Turkey. In the elections, people vote for those who they want to see as its rulers. That is, they don’t reward political parties they want to punish at polls as coalition partners,” said Mustafa Şentop, the deputy leader of AKP responsible for the election as well as the presidential system. Şentop is a constitutional law professor and is known as the architect of the AKP’s works on presidential system.
On the same day when Şentop’s remarks were delivered, some newspapers reported on Jan. 29 the presidential system would be the top highlight of the AKP’s election declaration.
On the same day, however, AKP Deputy Chair Beşir Atalay refuted the reports, saying the study on election declaration was not yet finalized.
- published: 30 Jan 2015
- views: 3
Presidential system tops AKP’s election campaign
A new constitution and the adoption of a presidential system are the two major goals of the ruling party in its pre-election campaign, a senior Justice and Deve...
A new constitution and the adoption of a presidential system are the two major goals of the ruling party in its pre-election campaign, a senior Justice and Development Party (AKP) has said, suggesting that France’s semi-presidential system was the most appropriate for Turkey.
“In my opinion, a semi-presidential system is the most convenient one for Turkey. In the elections, people vote for those who they want to see as its rulers. That is, they don’t reward political parties they want to punish at polls as coalition partners,” Mustafa Şentop, the deputy leader of AKP responsible for the election as well as the presidential system. Şentop is a constitutional law professor and is known as the architect of the AKP’s works on presidential system.
The debate on the presidential was relaunched after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan expressed his belief last week that Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s main election promise would be the adoption of the presidential system. Erdoğan’s statement prompted claims about a disagreement between the two leaders as the prime minister has not made any statement about the adoption of the presidential system. The issue was not discussed during this week’s AKP parliamentary group meeting either.
However, some prominent AKP officials have begun deliberations on the issue.
“The most important aspect of the presidential system is that it allows the people to elect the members of the legislative and the executive at the same time,” Şentop said. “Therefore, it brings about a powerful government with at least the support of 50 percent of the people.”
New constitution, presidential system
One of the most significant issues during the June 7 elections will be the new constitution, and the new constitution’s most important aspect will be the presidential system, Şentop said. “This discussion is not new. We have been talking about this for the last two years. We presented the options [for the presidential system] during the parliamentary panel [tasked with rewriting the constitution]. It will constitute one of the important titles of our election manifesto.”
Şentop suggested the French semi-presidential system was the most suitable for Turkey but said the powers given to the president and parliament, as well as the president’s relations with the government, could be debated anew.
“When you look at it, there are nuances that distinguish the French semi-presidential system from the existing system in Turkey. The French president always presides over cabinet meetings. Our system stipulates the same right ‘when necessary.’ The cabinet’s power to issue decrees in Turkey is not much different than the French system. Our system could be transformed into a presidential system through minor amendments,” he said.
Presidency does not bring federation
One issue Şentop wanted to emphasize is that the adoption of a presidential system would not necessarily result in a federation, as argued by many circles that the ruling party is in negotiations with the Peoples’ Democracy Party (HDP) to create federal states in return for support of a presidential system.
“There is a misinterpreted issue: The presidential system does not necessitate federations. This is completely false. There are so many countries ruled by a presidential system with a unitary structure. There are also countries that have adopted a parliamentary system with federalism, like Germany,” he said.
Changing the administrative system to a presidential one will be obligatory in the forthcoming period so that the opposition parties will have time to make decisions as well, Şentop said.
“What we have in Turkey is not a full parliamentary system. You will realize that each and every constitutional amendment is moving Turkey toward the presidential system. The latest step allowing the people to elect the president makes this change obligatory,” he said.
wn.com/Presidential System Tops Akp’S Election Campaign
A new constitution and the adoption of a presidential system are the two major goals of the ruling party in its pre-election campaign, a senior Justice and Development Party (AKP) has said, suggesting that France’s semi-presidential system was the most appropriate for Turkey.
“In my opinion, a semi-presidential system is the most convenient one for Turkey. In the elections, people vote for those who they want to see as its rulers. That is, they don’t reward political parties they want to punish at polls as coalition partners,” Mustafa Şentop, the deputy leader of AKP responsible for the election as well as the presidential system. Şentop is a constitutional law professor and is known as the architect of the AKP’s works on presidential system.
The debate on the presidential was relaunched after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan expressed his belief last week that Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s main election promise would be the adoption of the presidential system. Erdoğan’s statement prompted claims about a disagreement between the two leaders as the prime minister has not made any statement about the adoption of the presidential system. The issue was not discussed during this week’s AKP parliamentary group meeting either.
However, some prominent AKP officials have begun deliberations on the issue.
“The most important aspect of the presidential system is that it allows the people to elect the members of the legislative and the executive at the same time,” Şentop said. “Therefore, it brings about a powerful government with at least the support of 50 percent of the people.”
New constitution, presidential system
One of the most significant issues during the June 7 elections will be the new constitution, and the new constitution’s most important aspect will be the presidential system, Şentop said. “This discussion is not new. We have been talking about this for the last two years. We presented the options [for the presidential system] during the parliamentary panel [tasked with rewriting the constitution]. It will constitute one of the important titles of our election manifesto.”
Şentop suggested the French semi-presidential system was the most suitable for Turkey but said the powers given to the president and parliament, as well as the president’s relations with the government, could be debated anew.
“When you look at it, there are nuances that distinguish the French semi-presidential system from the existing system in Turkey. The French president always presides over cabinet meetings. Our system stipulates the same right ‘when necessary.’ The cabinet’s power to issue decrees in Turkey is not much different than the French system. Our system could be transformed into a presidential system through minor amendments,” he said.
Presidency does not bring federation
One issue Şentop wanted to emphasize is that the adoption of a presidential system would not necessarily result in a federation, as argued by many circles that the ruling party is in negotiations with the Peoples’ Democracy Party (HDP) to create federal states in return for support of a presidential system.
“There is a misinterpreted issue: The presidential system does not necessitate federations. This is completely false. There are so many countries ruled by a presidential system with a unitary structure. There are also countries that have adopted a parliamentary system with federalism, like Germany,” he said.
Changing the administrative system to a presidential one will be obligatory in the forthcoming period so that the opposition parties will have time to make decisions as well, Şentop said.
“What we have in Turkey is not a full parliamentary system. You will realize that each and every constitutional amendment is moving Turkey toward the presidential system. The latest step allowing the people to elect the president makes this change obligatory,” he said.
- published: 30 Jan 2015
- views: 0
Presidential Republics and Parliamentary Democracies
I explain the differences between Presidential Republics and Parliamentary Democracies....
I explain the differences between Presidential Republics and Parliamentary Democracies.
wn.com/Presidential Republics And Parliamentary Democracies
I explain the differences between Presidential Republics and Parliamentary Democracies.
- published: 31 Mar 2015
- views: 10
Parliamentary vs Presidential
SS6CG4 The student will compare and contrast various forms of government. c. Describe the two predominant forms of democratic governments: parliamentary and ......
SS6CG4 The student will compare and contrast various forms of government. c. Describe the two predominant forms of democratic governments: parliamentary and ...
wn.com/Parliamentary Vs Presidential
SS6CG4 The student will compare and contrast various forms of government. c. Describe the two predominant forms of democratic governments: parliamentary and ...
Danze proze semi-prezidansyel Ramgoolam ek Berenger
Manb LALIT Ram Seegobin explik linportans eleksyon 2014 ki pe vini. Li expoz danze proze sistem semi-prezidansyel Ramgoolam ek Berenger. Li osi expoz kimanyer k...
Manb LALIT Ram Seegobin explik linportans eleksyon 2014 ki pe vini. Li expoz danze proze sistem semi-prezidansyel Ramgoolam ek Berenger. Li osi expoz kimanyer koalisyon PT-MMM ena baking klas kapitalist. Li explik mo-dord LALIT fas a sa danze-la. Pu plis detay, chek nu websayt: www.lalitmauritius.org
wn.com/Danze Proze Semi Prezidansyel Ramgoolam Ek Berenger
Manb LALIT Ram Seegobin explik linportans eleksyon 2014 ki pe vini. Li expoz danze proze sistem semi-prezidansyel Ramgoolam ek Berenger. Li osi expoz kimanyer koalisyon PT-MMM ena baking klas kapitalist. Li explik mo-dord LALIT fas a sa danze-la. Pu plis detay, chek nu websayt: www.lalitmauritius.org
- published: 30 Sep 2014
- views: 189
Difficulty of French Model in Nepal: Dangers of cohabitation - Part 1
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin......
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin...
wn.com/Difficulty Of French Model In Nepal Dangers Of Cohabitation Part 1
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin...
Difficulty of French Model in Nepal: Dangers of cohabitation - Part 2
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin......
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin...
wn.com/Difficulty Of French Model In Nepal Dangers Of Cohabitation Part 2
At a time when Nepal is reeling under serious debates concerning the system of federalism and forms of governance, some political parties have been advocatin...
Turkish-style presidential system needed, Erdoğan repeats
Unlike what many argue, establishing an authentic Turkish-style presidential system is both possible and necessary, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has stressed,...
Unlike what many argue, establishing an authentic Turkish-style presidential system is both possible and necessary, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has stressed, underlining that presidential systems in different countries around the world vary in form.
“It is being said: ‘A Turkish-type presidential system is not possible.’ I am saying it loud and clear: It is possible, pure and simple. Why wouldn’t it be?” Erdoğan said on Feb. 27, delivering a speech to governors from all 81 provinces of the country at the presidential palace in Ankara.
“In America, there is a different presidential system; when you go just to its south, in Mexico, there is a different presidential system. When you go to Cuba, it is different; Argentina is different; Brazil is different; Russia is different; France has a semi-presidential system,” he added.
Erdoğan is Turkey’s first directly-elected president and has repeatedly vowed to wield more power than his predecessors, prompting critics to accuse him of unconstitutionally centralizing power in what they say is a de facto presidential system.
Earlier this week, he said he would host his second cabinet meeting as head of state on March 9, a further sign of his determination to keep a firm grip on power.
Previous heads of state have only chaired cabinet meetings in times of crises.
Erdoğan hopes a comprehensive victory for the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), which he led for longer than a decade, in the June general election, will open the way to constitutional reforms that could formally usher in a presidential system.
Speaking to the governors in Ankara, he used a metaphorical explanation in which he likened himself and his comrades to bees. “With the skillfulness of a bee, let’s gather our share from flowers and then turn it to honey,” he said, suggesting that they would eventually form an “authentic presidential system framed by Turkish customs and traditions.”
Last week, Erdoğan’s predecessor, the 11th President of the Republic of Turkey, Abdullah Gül, struck a note of caution on the much-discussed presidential system that Erdoğan wants Turkey to adopt, underlining the need to preserve the system of checks and balances, “like in the United States.”
“What kind of presidential system [are we talking about]? This is very important. It should not be a Turkish-style presidential system,” Gül said, apparently challenging Erdoğan’s recent statements that the government would build a system unique to Turkey.
Erdoğan’s Feb. 27 emphasis on a “Turkish-style” system was widely considered to have been a response to Gül’s remarks.
wn.com/Turkish Style Presidential System Needed, Erdoğan Repeats
Unlike what many argue, establishing an authentic Turkish-style presidential system is both possible and necessary, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has stressed, underlining that presidential systems in different countries around the world vary in form.
“It is being said: ‘A Turkish-type presidential system is not possible.’ I am saying it loud and clear: It is possible, pure and simple. Why wouldn’t it be?” Erdoğan said on Feb. 27, delivering a speech to governors from all 81 provinces of the country at the presidential palace in Ankara.
“In America, there is a different presidential system; when you go just to its south, in Mexico, there is a different presidential system. When you go to Cuba, it is different; Argentina is different; Brazil is different; Russia is different; France has a semi-presidential system,” he added.
Erdoğan is Turkey’s first directly-elected president and has repeatedly vowed to wield more power than his predecessors, prompting critics to accuse him of unconstitutionally centralizing power in what they say is a de facto presidential system.
Earlier this week, he said he would host his second cabinet meeting as head of state on March 9, a further sign of his determination to keep a firm grip on power.
Previous heads of state have only chaired cabinet meetings in times of crises.
Erdoğan hopes a comprehensive victory for the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), which he led for longer than a decade, in the June general election, will open the way to constitutional reforms that could formally usher in a presidential system.
Speaking to the governors in Ankara, he used a metaphorical explanation in which he likened himself and his comrades to bees. “With the skillfulness of a bee, let’s gather our share from flowers and then turn it to honey,” he said, suggesting that they would eventually form an “authentic presidential system framed by Turkish customs and traditions.”
Last week, Erdoğan’s predecessor, the 11th President of the Republic of Turkey, Abdullah Gül, struck a note of caution on the much-discussed presidential system that Erdoğan wants Turkey to adopt, underlining the need to preserve the system of checks and balances, “like in the United States.”
“What kind of presidential system [are we talking about]? This is very important. It should not be a Turkish-style presidential system,” Gül said, apparently challenging Erdoğan’s recent statements that the government would build a system unique to Turkey.
Erdoğan’s Feb. 27 emphasis on a “Turkish-style” system was widely considered to have been a response to Gül’s remarks.
- published: 27 Feb 2015
- views: 1
Ukrainians in Kuwait vote in snap parliamentary elections at embassy polling station
Ukrainian voters headed to the polls in snap elections for a new parliament that is set to play a bigger role in the country, following the shift of power in Uk...
Ukrainian voters headed to the polls in snap elections for a new parliament that is set to play a bigger role in the country, following the shift of power in Ukraine's semi-presidential system in February, 2014.
President Petro Poroshenko called the poll, which he described as an historic chance to set the country back on the pro-Western path.
The Ukrainian Embassy in Kuwait also opened a polling station for the almost 200 Ukrainian voters residing in the country.
wn.com/Ukrainians In Kuwait Vote In Snap Parliamentary Elections At Embassy Polling Station
Ukrainian voters headed to the polls in snap elections for a new parliament that is set to play a bigger role in the country, following the shift of power in Ukraine's semi-presidential system in February, 2014.
President Petro Poroshenko called the poll, which he described as an historic chance to set the country back on the pro-Western path.
The Ukrainian Embassy in Kuwait also opened a polling station for the almost 200 Ukrainian voters residing in the country.
- published: 27 Oct 2014
- views: 3
Some KMT members question timing, motives of Eric Chu’s proposed reforms
New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu’s call for reform has sparked debate within the KMT. While some party members suggest that the time for constitutional reform may not ...
New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu’s call for reform has sparked debate within the KMT. While some party members suggest that the time for constitutional reform may not be right, Chu insists that his preferred reforms could make the government more accountable to the people. When Chu announced last week that he was running to become KMT chairman, he also said he wished for a parliamentary system of government to replace Taiwan’s semi-presidential system. The proposal set off a ripple effect within his party.Wu Den-yihVice PresidentSincerity is most important. You can’t be calculating. Raising this type of suggestion will lead to mutual suspicion and conjecture. It is especially difficult to achieve success in this manner.Jason HuTaichung MayorAt this stage, could it be dissatisfaction with the president that led to discussion of changing the system? We have weighed the merits of a presidential system or a parliamentary system for a long time. We should continue this discussion before making a decision.Wang Jin-pyngLegislative SpeakerThe party caucus can issue a proposal, as can committee members. There will certainly be many versions. We definitely want consensus among each party.While KMT heavyweights have different views, Chu remains committed.Eric ChuNew Taipei MayorWe must bravely and wholeheartedly face this issue. Along the way, there will certainly be many difficulties. But I believe that if we are committed to working on behalf of Taiwan in the absence of political party or individual scheming then we can solve many problems.Chu’s proposal has set off fierce debate not only between parties but also within the KMT itself.
wn.com/Some Kmt Members Question Timing, Motives Of Eric Chu’S Proposed Reforms
New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu’s call for reform has sparked debate within the KMT. While some party members suggest that the time for constitutional reform may not be right, Chu insists that his preferred reforms could make the government more accountable to the people. When Chu announced last week that he was running to become KMT chairman, he also said he wished for a parliamentary system of government to replace Taiwan’s semi-presidential system. The proposal set off a ripple effect within his party.Wu Den-yihVice PresidentSincerity is most important. You can’t be calculating. Raising this type of suggestion will lead to mutual suspicion and conjecture. It is especially difficult to achieve success in this manner.Jason HuTaichung MayorAt this stage, could it be dissatisfaction with the president that led to discussion of changing the system? We have weighed the merits of a presidential system or a parliamentary system for a long time. We should continue this discussion before making a decision.Wang Jin-pyngLegislative SpeakerThe party caucus can issue a proposal, as can committee members. There will certainly be many versions. We definitely want consensus among each party.While KMT heavyweights have different views, Chu remains committed.Eric ChuNew Taipei MayorWe must bravely and wholeheartedly face this issue. Along the way, there will certainly be many difficulties. But I believe that if we are committed to working on behalf of Taiwan in the absence of political party or individual scheming then we can solve many problems.Chu’s proposal has set off fierce debate not only between parties but also within the KMT itself.
- published: 16 Dec 2014
- views: 8
French Fifth Republic
The Fifth Republic is the fifth and current republican constitution of France, introduced on 4 October 1958. The Fifth Republic emerged from the collapse of the...
The Fifth Republic is the fifth and current republican constitution of France, introduced on 4 October 1958. The Fifth Republic emerged from the collapse of the French Fourth Republic, replacing the prior parliamentary government with a semi-presidential system. It is France's third-longest-enduring political regime, after the pre-revolutionary Ancien Régime and the Third Republic.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/French Fifth Republic
The Fifth Republic is the fifth and current republican constitution of France, introduced on 4 October 1958. The Fifth Republic emerged from the collapse of the French Fourth Republic, replacing the prior parliamentary government with a semi-presidential system. It is France's third-longest-enduring political regime, after the pre-revolutionary Ancien Régime and the Third Republic.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 30 Sep 2014
- views: 3
Another Semi Presidential Book Pickup! + TTM's + eBay!
Check it out guys. Let me know what you think....
Check it out guys. Let me know what you think.
wn.com/Another Semi Presidential Book Pickup Ttm's Ebay
Check it out guys. Let me know what you think.
- published: 29 Mar 2012
- views: 22
-
author: 92592
Primary Elections Explained
Help support videos like this: http://www.cgpgrey.com/subbable *T-Shirts now for sale!* Help support making videos: http://goo.gl/1Wlnd Grey's blog: http://w......
Help support videos like this: http://www.cgpgrey.com/subbable *T-Shirts now for sale!* Help support making videos: http://goo.gl/1Wlnd Grey's blog: http://w...
wn.com/Primary Elections Explained
Help support videos like this: http://www.cgpgrey.com/subbable *T-Shirts now for sale!* Help support making videos: http://goo.gl/1Wlnd Grey's blog: http://w...
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 606263
-
author: CGP Grey
อ.วันชัย พรหมภา : ร่วมกันสร้างชาติด้วยหลักวิชาที่ถูกต้อง
"ระบบรัฐสภา" (Parliamentary System) หมายถึง สภาผู้แทนราษฎร (House of Representatives) เป็น "สถาบันหลักทางการเมือง" หรือ เป็น "ผู้ถือดุล" ทางการเมือง เป็นระบบ (F...
"ระบบรัฐสภา" (Parliamentary System) หมายถึง สภาผู้แทนราษฎร (House of Representatives) เป็น "สถาบันหลักทางการเมือง" หรือ เป็น "ผู้ถือดุล" ทางการเมือง เป็นระบบ (Fusion of Powers)
"ระบบประธานาธิบดี" (Presidential System) หมายถึง ประธานาธิบดี (President) เป็นสถาบัน หลักทางการเมือง หรือเป็นผู้ถือดุลทางการเมือง
"ระบบกึ่งประธานาธิบดี" (Semi-Presidential System) หมายถึง เป็นระบบกึ่งแยกอำนาจ (Semi-Separation of Powers) เป็นผู้ถือดุล
ผู้ถือดุล หรือสถาบันทางการเมือง ย่อมมีอำนาจมากกว่าสถาบันอื่น จึงต้องมาจากการเลือกตั้ง เช่น ระบบรัฐสภา สมาชิกสภาผู้แทนราษฎรต้องมาจากการเลือกตั้ง ระบบประธานาธิบดี ประธานาธิบดีจึงต้องมาจากการเลือกตั้ง สถาบันอื่นที่ไม่ใช่สถาบันหลักทางการเมืองไม่จำเป็นต้อง เลือกตั้ง
แต่บ้านเราเลือกตั้งกันทุกสถาบันแล้ว ยังเอาวุฒิสภาเป็นผู้ถือดุลอีก จึงไม่รู้ว่าเราใช้ระบบอะไร แม้แต่ผู้ร่างรัฐธรรมนูญก็ยังไม่รู้ เวรกรรมประเทศไทย ทำให้การปกครองระส่ำระสาย ไร้เสถียรภาพ แก้ไม่ตก
wn.com/อ.วันชัย พรหมภา ร่วมกันสร้างชาติด้วยหลักวิชาที่ถูกต้อง
"ระบบรัฐสภา" (Parliamentary System) หมายถึง สภาผู้แทนราษฎร (House of Representatives) เป็น "สถาบันหลักทางการเมือง" หรือ เป็น "ผู้ถือดุล" ทางการเมือง เป็นระบบ (Fusion of Powers)
"ระบบประธานาธิบดี" (Presidential System) หมายถึง ประธานาธิบดี (President) เป็นสถาบัน หลักทางการเมือง หรือเป็นผู้ถือดุลทางการเมือง
"ระบบกึ่งประธานาธิบดี" (Semi-Presidential System) หมายถึง เป็นระบบกึ่งแยกอำนาจ (Semi-Separation of Powers) เป็นผู้ถือดุล
ผู้ถือดุล หรือสถาบันทางการเมือง ย่อมมีอำนาจมากกว่าสถาบันอื่น จึงต้องมาจากการเลือกตั้ง เช่น ระบบรัฐสภา สมาชิกสภาผู้แทนราษฎรต้องมาจากการเลือกตั้ง ระบบประธานาธิบดี ประธานาธิบดีจึงต้องมาจากการเลือกตั้ง สถาบันอื่นที่ไม่ใช่สถาบันหลักทางการเมืองไม่จำเป็นต้อง เลือกตั้ง
แต่บ้านเราเลือกตั้งกันทุกสถาบันแล้ว ยังเอาวุฒิสภาเป็นผู้ถือดุลอีก จึงไม่รู้ว่าเราใช้ระบบอะไร แม้แต่ผู้ร่างรัฐธรรมนูญก็ยังไม่รู้ เวรกรรมประเทศไทย ทำให้การปกครองระส่ำระสาย ไร้เสถียรภาพ แก้ไม่ตก
- published: 08 Mar 2014
- views: 20
سلطنة عُمان - أوكرانيا
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. Ukraine borders the Russian Federation to the east and northeast, Belarus to the northwest, Poland, Slovakia and Hung......
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. Ukraine borders the Russian Federation to the east and northeast, Belarus to the northwest, Poland, Slovakia and Hung...
wn.com/سلطنة عُمان أوكرانيا
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe. Ukraine borders the Russian Federation to the east and northeast, Belarus to the northwest, Poland, Slovakia and Hung...
Oppostition party′s floor leader seeks referendum on constitutional revision dur
Back here in the nation... constitutional reform... once a hot presidential election topic... has faded a bit due to overshadowing concerns over the economy and...
Back here in the nation... constitutional reform... once a hot presidential election topic... has faded a bit due to overshadowing concerns over the economy and security issues.
But the opposition camp wants to revive the issue and it has set its own deadline to bring about reform.
Lee Ji-yoon has more.
Let the public decide whether or not Korea needs an amended constitution.
That′s what the main opposition New Politics Alliance for Democracy′s floor leader Woo Yoon-keun plans to do next year.
"Let′s form a special committee at the National Assembly this month to start rewriting the Constitution. Whether it be a semi-presidential system or a parliamentary cabinet system, let′s discuss all options. Then, we should hold a national referendum on the amended constitution during next year′s April general elections."
The opposition camp has been criticizing the president for exerting "emperor-like" power under the Constitution.
It wants to revise the law to limit the president′s power over nominating members of the Cabinet and the Constitutional Court.
The party′s also pushing for a system in which the prime minister would take the administrative power and such power would be guaranteed by the legal system, not by the president.
However, the opposition camp′s efforts to move forward with the issue faces a tough road ahead.
For one, President Park Geun-hye refuses to discuss the issue.
She says, doing so, would only shift the public′s attention away from her economic initiatives, which she believes is a priority for the nation right now.
The ruling party′s new floor leader Yoo Seong-min also said Wednesday that they would need more time to discuss the issue because of contradicting views within the party.
The current Constitution was last revised in 1987 with the end of the country′s military rule.
Lee Ji-yoon, Arirang News.
wn.com/Oppostition Party′S Floor Leader Seeks Referendum On Constitutional Revision Dur
Back here in the nation... constitutional reform... once a hot presidential election topic... has faded a bit due to overshadowing concerns over the economy and security issues.
But the opposition camp wants to revive the issue and it has set its own deadline to bring about reform.
Lee Ji-yoon has more.
Let the public decide whether or not Korea needs an amended constitution.
That′s what the main opposition New Politics Alliance for Democracy′s floor leader Woo Yoon-keun plans to do next year.
"Let′s form a special committee at the National Assembly this month to start rewriting the Constitution. Whether it be a semi-presidential system or a parliamentary cabinet system, let′s discuss all options. Then, we should hold a national referendum on the amended constitution during next year′s April general elections."
The opposition camp has been criticizing the president for exerting "emperor-like" power under the Constitution.
It wants to revise the law to limit the president′s power over nominating members of the Cabinet and the Constitutional Court.
The party′s also pushing for a system in which the prime minister would take the administrative power and such power would be guaranteed by the legal system, not by the president.
However, the opposition camp′s efforts to move forward with the issue faces a tough road ahead.
For one, President Park Geun-hye refuses to discuss the issue.
She says, doing so, would only shift the public′s attention away from her economic initiatives, which she believes is a priority for the nation right now.
The ruling party′s new floor leader Yoo Seong-min also said Wednesday that they would need more time to discuss the issue because of contradicting views within the party.
The current Constitution was last revised in 1987 with the end of the country′s military rule.
Lee Ji-yoon, Arirang News.
- published: 04 Feb 2015
- views: 17
De facto presidential system in Turkey in effect despite PM
Four newspapers had almost identical headlines yesterday in Turkey: The Jan. 19 cabinet meeting presided over by President Tayyip Erdoğan was the “First step to...
Four newspapers had almost identical headlines yesterday in Turkey: The Jan. 19 cabinet meeting presided over by President Tayyip Erdoğan was the “First step toward a presidential system” in Turkey.
In fact, it isn't fair to describe those four papers - namely Sabah, Yeni Şafak, Star and Akşam - as “pro-government” any longer, because they have all started to make a distinction between Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s line and that of Erdoğan. This distinction is in favor of the latter, despite all titles leaning toward the same ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Parti).
The Jan. 19 cabinet meeting was an unusually long one, lasting over eight-and-a-half hours. Before it started, the ministers had to wait silently in the meeting hall of the Presidential Palace for 80 minutes, as Erdoğan wanted to speak to Davutoğlu one-on-one.
Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç told reporters after the meeting that the regime had not changed just because Erdoğan had chaired the cabinet, saying it was “still a sort of parliamentary system."
But being good with words, Davutoğlu was not as long-faced as he appeared in the photos taken after his 80-minute meeting with Erdoğan when he was in London the next morning. With a cheerful smile, he said that Jan. 19 was simply a “smooth transition” between the president and the prime minister, as well as a successful “test” showing that there was an “efficient government and a political vision” in Turkey.
This would all be fine, if the constitution described a job distribution between the president and the prime minister. But it does not.
What is actually happening is a de facto transition from Turkey’s parliamentary system to a strong presidential, or semi-presidential system under Erdoğan. It is de facto because it does not need a constitutional change as long as the president finds a 100 percent harmonious prime minister and government that will do exactly what he says, when he says it, and the way he says it. It seems as if Davutoğlu is happy with this.
Speaking of tests, Davutoğlu has already had a few. For example, it was he who reportedly told the four ex-ministers accused of corruption to volunteer to go to the Constitutional Court to clear their names. But when this raised Erdoğan’s eyebrows, the AK Parti deputies in Parliament’s Investigation Commission raised their hands to clear the accused ex-ministers of the need to be tried. Yesterday, again with AK Parti votes in Parliament's General Assembly, all four ex-ministers were cleared of all charges - not through an independent judicial procedure but by political voting.
The next test is likely to be about two “reform” announcements about the economy by Davutoğlu. One is about the transparency of public servants' and political party chiefs' accounts, and the other is a new regulation to take earnings from real estate assets under fiscal control. But Erdoğan thought it was not the time to bring new regulations and restrictions, as the country is heading to parliamentary elections on June 7. He told this to executives of the AK Parti, who he invited to his new Presidential Palace in the absence of Davutoğlu.
Now, the question is being asked in Ankara’s political backstage whether Davutoğlu will be able to bring those two “reforms” to parliament and, if he does so, whether he will be able to get them passed. Whether the AK Parti deputies will listen to Erdoğan or Davutoğlu is not even being questioned.
Davutoğlu describes it as merely a “smooth transition” between the prime minister and the president, but it is clear that a strong presidential system started to replace the parliamentary system on Jan. 19, 2015.
wn.com/De Facto Presidential System In Turkey In Effect Despite Pm
Four newspapers had almost identical headlines yesterday in Turkey: The Jan. 19 cabinet meeting presided over by President Tayyip Erdoğan was the “First step toward a presidential system” in Turkey.
In fact, it isn't fair to describe those four papers - namely Sabah, Yeni Şafak, Star and Akşam - as “pro-government” any longer, because they have all started to make a distinction between Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s line and that of Erdoğan. This distinction is in favor of the latter, despite all titles leaning toward the same ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Parti).
The Jan. 19 cabinet meeting was an unusually long one, lasting over eight-and-a-half hours. Before it started, the ministers had to wait silently in the meeting hall of the Presidential Palace for 80 minutes, as Erdoğan wanted to speak to Davutoğlu one-on-one.
Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç told reporters after the meeting that the regime had not changed just because Erdoğan had chaired the cabinet, saying it was “still a sort of parliamentary system."
But being good with words, Davutoğlu was not as long-faced as he appeared in the photos taken after his 80-minute meeting with Erdoğan when he was in London the next morning. With a cheerful smile, he said that Jan. 19 was simply a “smooth transition” between the president and the prime minister, as well as a successful “test” showing that there was an “efficient government and a political vision” in Turkey.
This would all be fine, if the constitution described a job distribution between the president and the prime minister. But it does not.
What is actually happening is a de facto transition from Turkey’s parliamentary system to a strong presidential, or semi-presidential system under Erdoğan. It is de facto because it does not need a constitutional change as long as the president finds a 100 percent harmonious prime minister and government that will do exactly what he says, when he says it, and the way he says it. It seems as if Davutoğlu is happy with this.
Speaking of tests, Davutoğlu has already had a few. For example, it was he who reportedly told the four ex-ministers accused of corruption to volunteer to go to the Constitutional Court to clear their names. But when this raised Erdoğan’s eyebrows, the AK Parti deputies in Parliament’s Investigation Commission raised their hands to clear the accused ex-ministers of the need to be tried. Yesterday, again with AK Parti votes in Parliament's General Assembly, all four ex-ministers were cleared of all charges - not through an independent judicial procedure but by political voting.
The next test is likely to be about two “reform” announcements about the economy by Davutoğlu. One is about the transparency of public servants' and political party chiefs' accounts, and the other is a new regulation to take earnings from real estate assets under fiscal control. But Erdoğan thought it was not the time to bring new regulations and restrictions, as the country is heading to parliamentary elections on June 7. He told this to executives of the AK Parti, who he invited to his new Presidential Palace in the absence of Davutoğlu.
Now, the question is being asked in Ankara’s political backstage whether Davutoğlu will be able to bring those two “reforms” to parliament and, if he does so, whether he will be able to get them passed. Whether the AK Parti deputies will listen to Erdoğan or Davutoğlu is not even being questioned.
Davutoğlu describes it as merely a “smooth transition” between the prime minister and the president, but it is clear that a strong presidential system started to replace the parliamentary system on Jan. 19, 2015.
- published: 20 Jan 2015
- views: 2