- Order:
- Duration: 1:47
- Published: 2010-11-16
- Uploaded: 2010-11-20
- Author: wewantglazerout2010
- http://wn.com/David_Bick_PIK_payment_could_be_the_start_of_a_takeover
- Email this video
- Sms this video
these configurations will be saved for each time you visit this page using this browser
PIK loans are typically unsecured (i.e. not backed by a pledging of assets) or with a deeply subordinated security structure (e.g., third lien). Maturities usually exceed five years and in a standard offer, the loan carries a detachable warrant (the right to purchase a certain number of shares of stock or bonds at a given price for a certain period of time) or a similar mechanism to allow the lender to share in the future success of the business, making it a hybrid security.
Interest on PIK loans is substantially higher than debt of higher priority, thus making the compound interest the dominating part of the repayable principle. In addition, PIK loans typically carry substantial refinancing risk, meaning that the cash flow of the borrower in the repayment period will usually not suffice to repay all monies owed if the company does not perform excellently. By that definition, PIK lenders prefer borrowers with strong growth potential. Because of the flexibility of the loan, also in the long term, there are basically no limits to structures and borrowers. Plus, in most jurisdictions the accruing interest is tax deductible, providing the borrower with a substantial tax shield.
In some cases, cash payment or PIK is at the discretion of the borrower; in other cases, it is determined by a cash flow trigger. These are sometimes derisively referred to as PIYW (“Pay If You Want”) and PIYC (“Pay If You Can”).
PIK loans in leveraged buy-outs typically carry a substantially higher interest and fee burden than do senior loans, second lien loans, or mezzanine loans of the same transaction. With yield exceeding 20% per annum, the acquirer has to be very diligent in assessing whether the cost of taking out a PIK loan does not outbalance his internal rate of return of equity investment.
Before the credit crunch of Summer 2008, several LBOs have seen some secured second-lien term bank loans coming with PIK or, more frequently, PIK toggle features, in order to support the firm's ability to cover cash interest during the initial period after the LBO. If the acquired company performs well, the PIK toggle feature allows the equity sponsor to avoid giving extraordinary returns to the PIK debt, which might happen if the debt were strictly PIK. Since the credit crunch, the PIK toggle has largely disappeared.
Often such arrangements are referred to by the acronym PIK. Most bonds pay cash, not in kind, coupons.
PIK can be used as a verb (e.g. the bond "PIKed") or an adjective (e.g. that bond is "PIKable"). Where a previously PIKed amount is revoked (as is permissible in some agreements), this is known as "unPIKing".
One high profile use of PIKs involved the controversial takeover of Manchester United Football Club in England by Malcolm Glazer in 2005. Glazer used PIK loans, which were sold to hedge funds, to fund the takeover, much to the displeasure of many of the club’s supporters, because the burden of the debt was placed on the club itself, not the Glazers.
This text is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA License. This text was originally published on Wikipedia and was developed by the Wikipedia community.