GREENS
TheStar.com | Federal Election | May calls for a cross-party coalition
May calls for a cross-party coalition
Email Story
Report Typo
AddThis

 

Leader wants an opposition partnership next time to conquer system in which Harper regained power
Oct 16, 2008 04:30 AM

Staff reporter

NEW GLASGOW, N.S.–Green Leader Elizabeth May has called for a cross-party coalition to stop a Conservative victory when the next election comes around.

May, whose party emerged from the election with a $2 million debt, said a coalition would overcome a "perverse" electoral system that gave the Conservatives a stronger minority government.

It would avoid vote splitting among parties that support strong action to reduce global warming, she told reporters yesterday.

"There's only one party whose position (on climate change) is disgraceful and dangerous and that's Mr. Harper's," May said, of the prime minister.

May has described the coalition as one where Greens, Liberals, NDP and Bloc Québécois would carve up seats according to the candidates most likely to defeat Conservatives.

May said it's the next best thing to replacing the first-past-the-post voting system with one that allocates seats according to a party's proportion of the national vote. Under proportional representation, the Greens' 7 per cent support Tuesday would have elected up to 22 MPs, May said.

The election increased the party's vote by more than 2 percentage points and saw May participate in the leaders' TV debates.

"The breakthrough unfortunately eluded us this time, but we're not going anywhere. The Green party is here to stay," said May, who scored 32 per cent of the vote in her unsuccessful bid to unseat Defence Minister Peter MacKay in the riding of Central Nova.

At least one leading Green was disappointed. Mike Nagy, who came in third in Guelph, blamed calls for strategic voting for a drop in party support on voting day.

"Elizabeth May called for it on some occasions but the party itself was not calling for strategic voting," Nagy said in an interview.

It's the kind of disgruntlement that could see May facing questions about her leadership.

May once stated she would rather see no Green MPs and the Conservatives out of power than a full caucus with Harper as prime minister.

Nagy, the party's environment critic, also made clear he doesn't back May's call for an anti-Conservative coalition.

"I believe you promote Green values and you get Greens elected to Parliament. It's not about trying to stop one party," he said. "There has to be some serious discussion in the party so that we are not compromising our votes for the sake of other parties."

Greens spent $4 million on the campaign. May said she'll spend the next few months raising donations to reduce the party's debt. And she wants to use the almost $2 per vote the party will receive under federal election laws to build a party "machine" for the next election.

She ended with a rousing defence of Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion.

"I think we may very well in the future describe him as the best prime minister we never had."

Comments on this story are now closed

expandContent

Elizabeth May may not be democratic enough

More than fifty years ago, and author named Neville Shute - Town like Alice and others- proposed a solution to the flaws of the democratic process - equal votes for unequal people. It was a good idea: there would be an entitlement to seven votes for each citizen: one for being born, some for serving the country in a military role, and others for education and various levels of accomplishment, with the ultimate being a supreme award by the country, the seventh vote, which few might gain. Elizabeth might choose to revisit this approach and assess it in her efforts to get things right.

Posted by Ataraxia at 7:27 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

May a Sore Loser

What I find even more revolting is that a party without any seats gets 2 million dollars of taxpayer’s money. What a waste! The audacity to bash the winning party as villains when they won using the same tactics ALL PARTIES USED is disgusting. Did you people even watch the Liberal and NDP ads or was your head in the sand? They were fear mongering attack ads. AND, Harper does have an environmental policy, contrary to what Greens spew. It is based on legislating compliance rather than a carbon tax that doesn't guarantee ANY COMPLIANCW WHATSOEVER. This sense of entitlement that Liberals have is just overwhelming and sickening. Get over it, you lost. As for May, disappear, you will not be missed.

Posted by Red4Ree at 6:59 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Best Prime Minister We Never Had

That line from Ms May about "best prime minister we never had" is is a steal from a comment made years ago about PC Robert Stanfield.I guess plagarism isn't limited to any one party.

Posted by The Observer at 6:52 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Getting Frustrated

This is not party building......the more May goes on like this the less of a chance she will be here for another election.

Posted by Btown Boy at 6:18 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

“It's the planet!”

As a long time supporter of the Green Party, I’m disappointed to see so many of you caught up in political partisan ideology. The entire reason Green Parties exists around the world is to install values into other parties, and to shape policy to a point where the Green Party no longer needs to exits. It’s amazing to see a party willing to put policy before party for the sake of the environment and a sustainable economy, and it’s a shame more Canadians refuse to see the value and benefits of this.

Posted by Koby1Kanoby at 6:15 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Make Ruling Coalition-Not Voting Coalition

May did OK in the election. She does not, however, understand politics. These different parties exist not as alternatives to the Conservatives, but as unique options in their own right. Her own party is a significant factor in Conservative gains. I think it silly anyone would voter for the Greens, but I think their vote is legitimate. Asking for a coalition is to ask for the Greens to cease to exist. If the NDP did the same, that would really change things in Ottawa, but limit voters' choices. A better coalition would be for the three parties to form a ruling coalition and thus make the Conservatives official opposition.

Posted by Andrew R. McGinn at 6:03 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Come what May

Clearly May never intended to win a seat in Parliament. This has been a ruse from the start. The "Greens" are not a progressive party. They are a right wing trojan horse.

Posted by Peter Francis at 6:03 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

JTLemay

I agree with Mike Nagy, if were going to be taken seriously as a party we have to be 100% commited to it. Rather than having people vote for someone they don't want, to prevent someone they want less is a poor way of operating. Nearly 1,000,000, votes let's have a voting system were you can have 1st. 2cd. 3rd. choice, then you can vote for who you want as #1 and the lesser of the evils as 2, 3 etc.

Posted by JTLemay at 5:58 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Let me get this straight......

So what she is saying I guess is any party that won a seat other than the Tories would run uncontested vs. the Tories next election and any party that finished second to the Tories would run a candidate and all the other parties would take a dive. Let's see. The Greens won ZERO seats and finished second in no more than 5. I guess they would run 5 candidates in the next election. Good luck getting all your Green Party members to go for that!

Posted by rob i at 5:51 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Why wait 4 years?

Check the egos at the door now! Get together and at the next best chance bring this government down.

Posted by Vera Gottlieb at 5:47 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Counter Intuitive

If it weren't for Elizabeth May, and her obvious shilling for the Liberals, there can be little doubt that the Green Party would have been taken more seriously by those looking for a NEW alternative to the traditional parties. Running in an unwinnable riding demonstrated John Tory-an bad judgement, making an overt deal with the Liberal leader demonstrated their collective indifference to genuine choice for the electorate and the fact that she was pushing - hard - to have people vote for a party other than her own demonstrates she isn't worthy of continuing to lead the Greens. That's because every vote she drove elsewhere deprived the Green Party of $1.75 in federal funding - every year until the next election. So if even 500 people, per riding, took her suggestion, the Green Party will have lost over $1 Million in support over the next four years! If you want to head a political party, then have the brains and the backbone to defend it's policies and platform - not someone else's!

Posted by statusquono at 5:43 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Enough already

She should just keep it zipped, really. This liberal surrogate cannot fool anyone anymore. She is a bigger disaster to the environment than Chernobyl.

Posted by Paleoconservative at 5:29 PM Thursday, October 16 2008

Page 1 of 5 < Prev Next >
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPECIAL
Follow the U.S. presidential campaign with the latest news, features and video an interactive graphics.
Doug Smith dips into his overflowing mail bag and expresses his joy that the home pre-season schedule is finally over.
Find more election stories, photos and video on our Election page, with complete riding-by-riding stories and results for the GTA and ...