Library Suspends Tor Node After DHS Intimidation
Update September 15, 2015: The Kilton Library board has met and, after hearing from Tor supporters in the community and the 4,314 people who signed our petition, have unanimously opted to reinstate the library's relay. Congratulations to the activists from the Tor Project and the Library Freedom Project who've worked on this effort.
The Kilton Public Library in Lebanon, New Hampshire, is not unusual in its commitment to the freedom to read in privacy. That commitment is shared by libraries all over the world, and written into the basic character of librarianship through documents like the American Library Association's “Freedom to Read Statement.” What's exceptional about Kilton, though, is it was selected by the Library Freedom Project and The Tor Project as the pilot location for a program to install Tor relays, and eventually exit nodes, in public libraries all over.
Libraries and Tor are a great match: Tor's software can help provide the technological underpinnings for the privacy and intellectual freedom that libraries seek to foster, and libraries can provide the institutional support that can make long-lived high-bandwidth nodes possible.
But that effort has attracted some powerful critics: just days after Kilton announced its participation in the program, a regional Department of Homeland Security office contacted the local police to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about Tor. The police got in touch with the library board, who suspended the program until they could vote on it on September 15.
Nima Fatemi, a Tor core developer and one of the originators of the libraries program, explained why libraries should stand up to that kind of law enforcement intimidation: “Libraries are one of the few entities around the world that actually care about freedom of speech and it's one of the core values of Tor.”
Fatemi is right about the link between libraries and freedom of speech—librarians have consistently been at the forefront of many important First Amendment battles. It's one reason EFF took the unusual step of honoring “Librarians Everywhere” with a Pioneer Award in 2000.
It's important that the library board hears from people who actually understand and value those qualities in an important privacy-enhancing tool like Tor. To that end, EFF joined a long list of signatories on a letter of support to the board, encouraging them to stand up for librarian ideals and reinstate the Tor relay.
And they need to hear from you, too. We've set up a page to allow members of the public to sign a statement of support, which our allies in the Library Freedom Project and The Tor Project will deliver to the September 15 meeting. Over 1,500 people have already signed—please lend your voice to that effort today.
As Fatemi puts it, “We respect whatever decision the library makes but are optimistic that they will make the right one with the support of the community and keep their relay online.”
We're also seeking more information about how and why the Department of Homeland Security is discouraging the use of Tor—and undermining the privacy and security of people who rely on it. EFF has filed a FOIA request seeking more information, and will publish news when we get it.
Recent DeepLinks Posts
-
Dec 3, 2015
-
Dec 3, 2015
-
Dec 3, 2015
-
Dec 3, 2015
-
Dec 2, 2015
Deeplinks Topics
- Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the Balance
- Free Speech
- Innovation
- International
- Know Your Rights
- Privacy
- Trade Agreements and Digital Rights
- Security
- State-Sponsored Malware
- Abortion Reporting
- Analog Hole
- Anonymity
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
- Biometrics
- Bloggers' Rights
- Broadcast Flag
- Broadcasting Treaty
- CALEA
- Cell Tracking
- Coders' Rights Project
- Computer Fraud And Abuse Act Reform
- Content Blocking
- Copyright Trolls
- Council of Europe
- Cyber Security Legislation
- CyberSLAPP
- Defend Your Right to Repair!
- Development Agenda
- Digital Books
- Digital Radio
- Digital Video
- DMCA
- DMCA Rulemaking
- Do Not Track
- DRM
- E-Voting Rights
- EFF Europe
- Encrypting the Web
- Export Controls
- FAQs for Lodsys Targets
- File Sharing
- Fixing Copyright? The 2013-2015 Copyright Review Process
- FTAA
- Genetic Information Privacy
- Hollywood v. DVD
- How Patents Hinder Innovation (Graphic)
- ICANN
- International Privacy Standards
- Internet Governance Forum
- Law Enforcement Access
- Legislative Solutions for Patent Reform
- Locational Privacy
- Mandatory Data Retention
- Mandatory National IDs and Biometric Databases
- Mass Surveillance Technologies
- Medical Privacy
- National Security and Medical Information
- National Security Letters
- Net Neutrality
- No Downtime for Free Speech
- NSA Spying
- OECD
- Offline : Imprisoned Bloggers and Technologists
- Online Behavioral Tracking
- Open Access
- Open Wireless
- Patent Busting Project
- Patent Trolls
- Patents
- PATRIOT Act
- Pen Trap
- Policy Analysis
- Printers
- Public Health Reporting and Hospital Discharge Data
- Reading Accessibility
- Real ID
- RFID
- Search Engines
- Search Incident to Arrest
- Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
- Social Networks
- SOPA/PIPA: Internet Blacklist Legislation
- Student and Community Organizing
- Student Privacy
- Stupid Patent of the Month
- Surveillance and Human Rights
- Surveillance Drones
- Terms Of (Ab)Use
- Test Your ISP
- The "Six Strikes" Copyright Surveillance Machine
- The Global Network Initiative
- The Law and Medical Privacy
- TPP's Copyright Trap
- Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
- Travel Screening
- TRIPS
- Trusted Computing
- Video Games
- Wikileaks
- WIPO
- Transparency
- Uncategorized