JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

New jobs cull at Department of Defence

The employment axe is hanging over another 6000 public servants at the Department of Defence as a new cull of its middle and upper management ranks gets under way.

Workers at the giant department were told on Monday that a new round of redundancies was targeting big reductions in its executive and senior executive ranks.

The news is the latest shock to a workforce that has been slashed by at least 3000, according to the latest available figures, since 2012.

Bosses at the department will not say how many of the thousands of EL and SES public servants it wants to cut but departmental secretary Dennis Richardson says he wants to cut middle managers who manage few or no workers.

Unions have already condemned the move, saying the "indiscriminate" redundancy program was "bone-headed" and would result in the loss of vital military specialists, many of who were employed at EL1 and EL2 level, but were not supposed to manage anyone.  

But Defence wants to improve its ratio of managers to rank-and-file workers which came under fire from the recent "First Principles" review which found there were nearly 2000 managers at the EL2 level, typically supervising a staff of three or less.

There were another 4000 or so staff members at the next level down, EL1, who typically supervise only one or two employees despite public service guidelines calling for middle managers to be supervising a staff of five to eight.

Mr Richardson, in a message sent to staff on Monday afternoon, said the department was still looking for "stability" in its headcount, despite having lost 17 per cent of its staff in recent years.

"As part of the Department's downsizing, there is a need to reduce EL numbers beyond that delivered through the natural attrition process over the past three years," the secretary wrote.

"Following the VR process for SES and EL officers, it is likely that the Department will be close to reaching a point of some stability in overall numbers."

Mr Richardson said the department might be in a position to begin hiring again in mid-2016.

But technical union Professionals Australia, which has many members working in Defence science and technology jobs, lashed out at the decision, saying it was likely to further erode Defence capability.

Professionals Australia director, Dave Smith, said he was frustrated with the lack of detail, including the refusal to confirm the number of jobs to be targeted, in Defence's announcement.

"The decision by the Government to have an agency wide, indiscriminate redundancy program for EL employees is rash and bone-headed," Mr Smith said.

"It borders on contempt for the Senate inquiry and will have consequences for critical projects and research programmes.

"It is driven by a general view that subject matter expertise should be no higher than an APS6 despite the need for world class and nation leading science, engineering and national security expertise and for that expertise to be valued accordingly.

"In engineering fields this will make Defence uncompetitive for the skills they need.

"Einstein would struggle to get a job in this organisation."

 

 

 

21 comments so far

  • They will all get redundancies and then go work for contractors and be paid twice the amount, but it will be hidden in contracts and not in numbers of public servants. It just means we pay ten times for something just so you can say the public service is smaller. The defence dollar will stretch less and less until it's a farce and the contractors will become richer. The whole plan is to give the defence budget directly to contractors and have the public service become contract managers. All the experience will be gone, and one day our men and women will pay for this folly with decisions made with contractors wanting to make the profits and not with their best interests at hand. Side note these large defence contractors are not Australian companies so the profits are heading overseas.

    Commenter
    Here we go again
    Date and time
    September 08, 2015, 12:00AM
    • I'm one of those employers of contractors and you're partially correct. I do employ some of these EL1 types although many find it hard to adjust to actually doing rather than talking and self-administering - these people are killed with never ending compliance.

      And not all of us are multinationals (although most are).

      Commenter
      podmore
      Location
      rusticle offices
      Date and time
      September 08, 2015, 11:48AM
    • It appears that Defence has the staff numbers, but not the skills.

      Maybe offering VRs is now the only means available for fixing the problem? Let lots of people go. The best are employed by the contracting companies. (The others get left by the wayside.) The skills stay in Australia, and can be turned on and turned off when required.

      In the mean time, those left in the department can't do the work they're supposed to do because the ones with the skills have departed, so those areas are shut down one by one and their work put out to market - to the contracting companies.

      Overall, it appears that the end result is a more efficient and cost-effective delivery of capability.

      Commenter
      Merry-go-round
      Date and time
      September 08, 2015, 8:27PM
  • Managers are the people with brains! Cuts should be limited to the plebs pushing pencils.

    Commenter
    Good to be King
    Location
    Ivory tower
    Date and time
    September 08, 2015, 12:18AM
    • It's not about how many they supervise! Its what expertise they have! This ratio business to drive redundancies is the most stupid thing. How one dimensional, reflecting no understanding of how the Aps works and little regard for business continuity. ELs are not "useless middle managers", they're the most experienced and knowledgable, teaching the APS level staff. So sack the teachers and people with knowledge and there is catastrophic business risk. It's just a stupid premise.

      Commenter
      stopit
      Location
      stopit
      Date and time
      September 08, 2015, 6:45AM
      • Tony Abbott has militarised the defence public service sector. This is why people join the military these days, so they can be given cushy desk jobs in public servant roles in Canberra.

        Most of them, in the Air Force, are allowed to stay in Canberra for over 5 years. Many have stayed in public servant positions in Canberra for 10 years. When they do get posted, they leave their families in taxpayer funded homes here in Canberra.

        And why Tony Abbott, do you feel the need for the Air Force personnel posted in Canberra to go on non-stop luxury trips around the world? Air Vice Marshals and Group Captains are extremely good at coming up with excuses as to why they should constantly travel internationally.

        And who pays for the cushy lifestyle of the military in Canberra? We, the taxpayers do!

        And Tony Abbott, don't you think that the JSF is just a heap of crap and a complete waste of our money? Everyone else knows it's a waste of money and should be scrapped.

        Scrap the JSF program, Abbott, and save the taxpayers some money - for a change!

        Commenter
        Sharron
        Location
        Canberra
        Date and time
        September 08, 2015, 7:44AM
        • Sharron, don't mistake what you see at AFHQ as what happens to Navy or Army. Most of the staff you see from the other services are on career postings to Canberra and many want to get back to ships and units as quickly as they can.

          Commenter
          podmore
          Location
          rusticle offices
          Date and time
          September 08, 2015, 11:53AM
      • This was caused by having to promote specialists to EL2 to be able to pay for their skills, because the system was too inflexible to pay lower classifications outside the standard pay scale. Does anybody actually check the facts before making these unilateral calls?

        Commenter
        Irene
        Date and time
        September 08, 2015, 7:49AM
        • Yes, I've seen this too. A better solution would be to revise the classifications and pay scales so that the standard pay scale does cover technical experts, without having to classify them as "managers". But I wonder if what the department really wants to do is just cut costs any way they can, and this is easiest for them.

          Commenter
          Pensioner
          Location
          Melbourne
          Date and time
          September 09, 2015, 2:02PM
      • What is the Net staffing loss to defence? Or another way to ask this question is, how many contractors have been employed to replace APS staff that have been made redundant?

        Commenter
        ekib
        Location
        15 Credibility Street
        Date and time
        September 08, 2015, 7:50AM

        More comments

        Make a comment

        You are logged in as [Logout]

        All information entered below may be published.

        Error: Please enter your screen name.

        Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Please enter your comment.

        Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

        Post to

        You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

        Thank you

        Your comment has been submitted for approval.

        Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

        HuffPost Australia

        Featured advertisers

        Special offers

        Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo