Deterrence in foreign affairs, as Bernard Brodie (1959) wrote in his seminal work, is nothing new. In the simplest sense, deterrence means using the threat of military action to compel an adversary to do something, or to prevent them from doing something, that another state desires. Deterrence theory gained increased prominence as a military strategy during the Cold War with regard to the use of nuclear weapons. And, it took on a unique connotation during this time as an inferior nuclear force, by virtue of its extreme destructive power, could deter a more powerful adversary -- provided that this force could be protected against destruction by a surprise attack. A credible nuclear deterrent, Brodie wrote, must be always at the ready, yet never used.
In Thomas Schelling’s (1966) classic work on deterrence, the concept that military strategy can no longer be defined as the science of military victory is presented. Instead, it is argued that military strategy was now equally, if not more, the art of coercion, of intimidation and deterrence.
How nuclear strategy defined the Cold War, based on the logic that one nuclear armed state would not attack another, out of fear of incurring unacceptable da...
5:20
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
Some national security experts believe that adhering to the theory of nuclear deterrence makes a country more secure. But does it really?
76:54
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nu...
27:11
Henry Kissinger on Nuclear Deterrence
Henry Kissinger on Nuclear Deterrence
Henry Kissinger on Nuclear Deterrence
Kissinger as an academic on deterrence and the Soviet Union. Interview from 1958.
59:05
Breaking Free from Nuclear Deterrence
Breaking Free from Nuclear Deterrence
Breaking Free from Nuclear Deterrence
Commander Robert Green (Royal Navy, Ret.) delivers the 2011 Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity's Future. Commander Green is the author of a recent book entit...
5:52
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
The chief scientific advisor discusses neuclear weapons with Prime Minister Jim Hacker.
42:25
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (desig
11:01
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
24:24
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
29.04.2013 Douglas Murray debates the General Secretary of the somehow still active CND, which still argues that if democracies drop their nuclear weapons th...
1:21
Insect Warfare - Nuclear Deterrence
Insect Warfare - Nuclear Deterrence
Insect Warfare - Nuclear Deterrence
Track 14 off the 2007 album World Extermination (Label: 625 Thrashcore) Join our facebook page at: The Grind Show http://www.facebook.com/TheGrindShow1 Insec...
3:01
West Wing 5:13 - Iran, Israel, and Nuclear Deterrence
West Wing 5:13 - Iran, Israel, and Nuclear Deterrence
West Wing 5:13 - Iran, Israel, and Nuclear Deterrence
128:03
20150625 - Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century
20150625 - Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century
20150625 - Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century
Subcommittee on Emerging Threats & Capabilities
5:15
Submarines, weapons of nuclear deterrence
Submarines, weapons of nuclear deterrence
Submarines, weapons of nuclear deterrence
Ile Longue in France is the operational base of the four French missile-launching nuclear submarines. NATO is currently reviewing its nuclear deterrence poli...
11:30
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
In a big step towards securing India's capabilities for nuclear deterrence, the reactor on board India's indigenously made nuclear-powered submarine INS Arih...
How nuclear strategy defined the Cold War, based on the logic that one nuclear armed state would not attack another, out of fear of incurring unacceptable da...
5:20
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
Some national security experts believe that adhering to the theory of nuclear deterrence makes a country more secure. But does it really?
76:54
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nu...
27:11
Henry Kissinger on Nuclear Deterrence
Henry Kissinger on Nuclear Deterrence
Henry Kissinger on Nuclear Deterrence
Kissinger as an academic on deterrence and the Soviet Union. Interview from 1958.
59:05
Breaking Free from Nuclear Deterrence
Breaking Free from Nuclear Deterrence
Breaking Free from Nuclear Deterrence
Commander Robert Green (Royal Navy, Ret.) delivers the 2011 Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity's Future. Commander Green is the author of a recent book entit...
5:52
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent
The chief scientific advisor discusses neuclear weapons with Prime Minister Jim Hacker.
42:25
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (desig
11:01
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
24:24
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
29.04.2013 Douglas Murray debates the General Secretary of the somehow still active CND, which still argues that if democracies drop their nuclear weapons th...
1:21
Insect Warfare - Nuclear Deterrence
Insect Warfare - Nuclear Deterrence
Insect Warfare - Nuclear Deterrence
Track 14 off the 2007 album World Extermination (Label: 625 Thrashcore) Join our facebook page at: The Grind Show http://www.facebook.com/TheGrindShow1 Insec...
3:01
West Wing 5:13 - Iran, Israel, and Nuclear Deterrence
West Wing 5:13 - Iran, Israel, and Nuclear Deterrence
West Wing 5:13 - Iran, Israel, and Nuclear Deterrence
128:03
20150625 - Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century
20150625 - Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century
20150625 - Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century
Subcommittee on Emerging Threats & Capabilities
5:15
Submarines, weapons of nuclear deterrence
Submarines, weapons of nuclear deterrence
Submarines, weapons of nuclear deterrence
Ile Longue in France is the operational base of the four French missile-launching nuclear submarines. NATO is currently reviewing its nuclear deterrence poli...
11:30
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
In a big step towards securing India's capabilities for nuclear deterrence, the reactor on board India's indigenously made nuclear-powered submarine INS Arih...
92:33
JHU/APL Rethinking Series 2013-2014: Minimum Nuclear Deterrence
JHU/APL Rethinking Series 2013-2014: Minimum Nuclear Deterrence
JHU/APL Rethinking Series 2013-2014: Minimum Nuclear Deterrence
On Oct. 10, 2013, as part of the JHU/APL Rethinking Seminar Series - Rethinking U.S. Enduring Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities (2013-2014), Dr. Keith...
14:01
The Nuclear Revolution: Requirements for Stable Nuclear Deterrence
The Nuclear Revolution: Requirements for Stable Nuclear Deterrence
The Nuclear Revolution: Requirements for Stable Nuclear Deterrence
Image Credits (Images are for Educational and Non-Commercial Purposes Only):
Harry Truman portrait courtesy of the Canadian government:
Image URL: http://collectionscanada.gc.ca/pam_archives/index.php?fuseaction=genitem.displayEcopies〈=eng&rec;_nbr=3193181&title;=President+Harry+Truman+and+Rt.+Hons.+Clement+Attlee+and+Mackenzie+King+boarding+U.S.C.G.+SEQUOIA+for+discussions+about+the+atomic+bomb.+&ecopy;=c023269
NSC-68 courtesy of the US Government:
Image URL: https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/584/flashcards/1443584/gif/arms35_011335641957830.gif
U.S. Air Force document by Chief of Staff General Twining to his fellow Chiefs of Staf
20:42
Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker HD - PLAYTHROUGH - PART 16 - "Nuclear Deterrence"
Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker HD - PLAYTHROUGH - PART 16 - "Nuclear Deterrence"
Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker HD - PLAYTHROUGH - PART 16 - "Nuclear Deterrence"
You like the video? Subscribe! ► http://bit.ly/SubThatOneRebel55
Link to my channel
► http://www.youtube.com/user/ThatOneRebel55
Social Media Links!
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThatOneRebel55
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThatOneRebel55
►Email: AskThatOneRebel@gmail.com
Peace Walker is set in Costa Rica in November 1974, four years after the events of Portable Ops and ten years after Snake Eater. Snake (Big Boss) is running his own mercenary unit after he decided to break away from The Patriots group founded by Major Zero after learning of the Les Enfants Terribles Project. A mysterious group equipped with the latest weapons, c
15:05
Obama Decimates USA's Nuclear Deterrence
Obama Decimates USA's Nuclear Deterrence
Obama Decimates USA's Nuclear Deterrence
Obama Decimates USA's Nuclear Deterrence
53:12
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence Dr Bill Wickersham
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence Dr Bill Wickersham
The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence Dr Bill Wickersham
Dr. Bill Wickersham, University of Missouri and Charles Atkins VFP Chapter, was interviewed by Dr. Dennis Mills about the myth of nuclear deterrence and why ...
2:45
Russia will resume production Tu-160 “White Swan” for nuclear deterrence
Russia will resume production Tu-160 “White Swan” for nuclear deterrence
Russia will resume production Tu-160 “White Swan” for nuclear deterrence
A BIG thank you for you support for the work I do to Mr Duke WOW!
Ms. Pennye, Mr. Thrasher, Mr Duke Ms. Mattsson, Mr. McNaughton and Ms. Mann
God Blessing to you! :-) Hugs
Help support the work I do with a $1. PayPal donation
marygreeley54@gmail.com
Thank you God Bless You all. Hugs :-)
3:52
Robert Greene on the Myths of Nuclear Deterrence
Robert Greene on the Myths of Nuclear Deterrence
Robert Greene on the Myths of Nuclear Deterrence
Robert Greene, a former commander in the British Royal Navy who supervised nuclear weapons discusses some of his arguments against nuclear weapons as an effe...
6:37
What Happened To India's Nuclear Deterrence?
What Happened To India's Nuclear Deterrence?
What Happened To India's Nuclear Deterrence?
Retired Indian Army Lt. Gen. Vinay Shankar, who is currently a member of the Council of the United Service Institution of India, talks about the origins of I...
3:06
Yes, Prime Minister: Nuclear Deterrent- Scrapping Trident
Yes, Prime Minister: Nuclear Deterrent- Scrapping Trident
Yes, Prime Minister: Nuclear Deterrent- Scrapping Trident
A discussion between Jim Hacker and Humphrey Appleby.
How nuclear strategy defined the Cold War, based on the logic that one nuclear armed state would not attack another, out of fear of incurring unacceptable da...
How nuclear strategy defined the Cold War, based on the logic that one nuclear armed state would not attack another, out of fear of incurring unacceptable da...
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nu...
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nu...
Commander Robert Green (Royal Navy, Ret.) delivers the 2011 Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity's Future. Commander Green is the author of a recent book entit...
Commander Robert Green (Royal Navy, Ret.) delivers the 2011 Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity's Future. Commander Green is the author of a recent book entit...
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (designated C4) was deployed in 1979 and retired in 2005. Its objective was to achieve performance similar to Poseidon (C3) but at extended range which improved survivability of the submarine. Trident II (designated D5) had the objective of improved accuracy, and was first deployed in 1990, and was planned to be in service for the thirty-year life of the submarines, until 2027.
Trident missiles are provided to the United Kingdom under the terms of the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement which was modified in 1982 for Trident. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher wrote to President Carter on 10 July 1980, to request that he approve supply of Trident I missiles. However, in 1982 Thatcher wrote to President Reagan to request the United Kingdom be allowed to procure the Trident II system, the procurement of which had been accelerated by the US Navy. This was agreed in March 1982. Under the agreement, the United Kingdom paid an additional 5% of their total procurement cost of 2.5 billion dollars to the US government as a research and development contribution.
The launch from the submarine occurs below the ocean surface. The missiles are ejected from their tubes by igniting an explosive charge in a separate container which is separated by seventeen titanium alloy pinnacles activated by a double alloy steam system. The energy from the blast is directed to a water tank, which is flash-vaporized to steam. The subsequent pressure spike is strong enough to eject the missile out of the tube and give it enough momentum to reach and clear the surface of the water. The missile is pressurized with nitrogen to prevent the intrusion of water into any internal spaces, which could damage the missile or add weight, destabilizing the missile. Should the missile fail to breach the surface of the water, there are several safety mechanisms that can either deactivate the missile before launch or guide the missile through an additional phase of launch. Inertial motion sensors are activated upon launch, and when the sensors detect downward acceleration after being blown out of the water, the first stage engine ignites. The aerospike, a telescoping outward extension that halves aerodynamic drag, is then deployed, and the boost phase begins. When the third stage motor fires, within two minutes of launch, the missile is traveling faster than 20,000 ft/s (6,000 m/s), or 13,600 mph (21,600 km/h).
The missile attains a temporary low altitude orbit only a few minutes after launch. The Guidance System for the missile was developed by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory and is maintained by a joint Draper/General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems facility. It is an Inertial Guidance System with an additional Star-Sighting system, which is used to correct small position and velocity errors that result from launch condition uncertainties due to the sub navigation system errors and some errors that have accrued by the guidance system during the flight due to imperfect instrument calibration. GPS has been used on some test flights but is assumed not to be available for a real mission. The fire control system was designed and continues to be maintained by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems.
Once the Star-sighting has been completed, the "bus" section of the missile maneuvers to achieve the various velocity vectors that will send the deployed multiple independent reentry vehicles to their individual targets. The downrange and crossrange dispersion of the targets remains classified.
The Trident was built in two variants: the I (C4) UGM-96A and II (D5) UGM-133A, however there is no direct relation between these two missiles. While the C4, formerly known as EXPO (Extended Range Poseidon), is just an improved version of the Poseidon C-3 missile, the Trident II D-5 has a completely new design (although with some technologies adopted from the C-4). The C4 and D5 designations put the missiles within the "family" that started in 1960 with Polaris (A1, A2 and A3) and continued with the 1971 Poseidon (C3). Both Trident versions are three-stage, solid-propellant, inertially guided missiles, and both guidance systems use a star sighting to improve overall weapons system accuracy.
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (designated C4) was deployed in 1979 and retired in 2005. Its objective was to achieve performance similar to Poseidon (C3) but at extended range which improved survivability of the submarine. Trident II (designated D5) had the objective of improved accuracy, and was first deployed in 1990, and was planned to be in service for the thirty-year life of the submarines, until 2027.
Trident missiles are provided to the United Kingdom under the terms of the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement which was modified in 1982 for Trident. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher wrote to President Carter on 10 July 1980, to request that he approve supply of Trident I missiles. However, in 1982 Thatcher wrote to President Reagan to request the United Kingdom be allowed to procure the Trident II system, the procurement of which had been accelerated by the US Navy. This was agreed in March 1982. Under the agreement, the United Kingdom paid an additional 5% of their total procurement cost of 2.5 billion dollars to the US government as a research and development contribution.
The launch from the submarine occurs below the ocean surface. The missiles are ejected from their tubes by igniting an explosive charge in a separate container which is separated by seventeen titanium alloy pinnacles activated by a double alloy steam system. The energy from the blast is directed to a water tank, which is flash-vaporized to steam. The subsequent pressure spike is strong enough to eject the missile out of the tube and give it enough momentum to reach and clear the surface of the water. The missile is pressurized with nitrogen to prevent the intrusion of water into any internal spaces, which could damage the missile or add weight, destabilizing the missile. Should the missile fail to breach the surface of the water, there are several safety mechanisms that can either deactivate the missile before launch or guide the missile through an additional phase of launch. Inertial motion sensors are activated upon launch, and when the sensors detect downward acceleration after being blown out of the water, the first stage engine ignites. The aerospike, a telescoping outward extension that halves aerodynamic drag, is then deployed, and the boost phase begins. When the third stage motor fires, within two minutes of launch, the missile is traveling faster than 20,000 ft/s (6,000 m/s), or 13,600 mph (21,600 km/h).
The missile attains a temporary low altitude orbit only a few minutes after launch. The Guidance System for the missile was developed by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory and is maintained by a joint Draper/General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems facility. It is an Inertial Guidance System with an additional Star-Sighting system, which is used to correct small position and velocity errors that result from launch condition uncertainties due to the sub navigation system errors and some errors that have accrued by the guidance system during the flight due to imperfect instrument calibration. GPS has been used on some test flights but is assumed not to be available for a real mission. The fire control system was designed and continues to be maintained by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems.
Once the Star-sighting has been completed, the "bus" section of the missile maneuvers to achieve the various velocity vectors that will send the deployed multiple independent reentry vehicles to their individual targets. The downrange and crossrange dispersion of the targets remains classified.
The Trident was built in two variants: the I (C4) UGM-96A and II (D5) UGM-133A, however there is no direct relation between these two missiles. While the C4, formerly known as EXPO (Extended Range Poseidon), is just an improved version of the Poseidon C-3 missile, the Trident II D-5 has a completely new design (although with some technologies adopted from the C-4). The C4 and D5 designations put the missiles within the "family" that started in 1960 with Polaris (A1, A2 and A3) and continued with the 1971 Poseidon (C3). Both Trident versions are three-stage, solid-propellant, inertially guided missiles, and both guidance systems use a star sighting to improve overall weapons system accuracy.
29.04.2013 Douglas Murray debates the General Secretary of the somehow still active CND, which still argues that if democracies drop their nuclear weapons th...
29.04.2013 Douglas Murray debates the General Secretary of the somehow still active CND, which still argues that if democracies drop their nuclear weapons th...
Track 14 off the 2007 album World Extermination (Label: 625 Thrashcore) Join our facebook page at: The Grind Show http://www.facebook.com/TheGrindShow1 Insec...
Track 14 off the 2007 album World Extermination (Label: 625 Thrashcore) Join our facebook page at: The Grind Show http://www.facebook.com/TheGrindShow1 Insec...
Ile Longue in France is the operational base of the four French missile-launching nuclear submarines. NATO is currently reviewing its nuclear deterrence poli...
Ile Longue in France is the operational base of the four French missile-launching nuclear submarines. NATO is currently reviewing its nuclear deterrence poli...
In a big step towards securing India's capabilities for nuclear deterrence, the reactor on board India's indigenously made nuclear-powered submarine INS Arih...
In a big step towards securing India's capabilities for nuclear deterrence, the reactor on board India's indigenously made nuclear-powered submarine INS Arih...
On Oct. 10, 2013, as part of the JHU/APL Rethinking Seminar Series - Rethinking U.S. Enduring Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities (2013-2014), Dr. Keith...
On Oct. 10, 2013, as part of the JHU/APL Rethinking Seminar Series - Rethinking U.S. Enduring Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities (2013-2014), Dr. Keith...
Image Credits (Images are for Educational and Non-Commercial Purposes Only):
Harry Truman portrait courtesy of the Canadian government:
Image URL: http://collectionscanada.gc.ca/pam_archives/index.php?fuseaction=genitem.displayEcopies〈=eng&rec;_nbr=3193181&title;=President+Harry+Truman+and+Rt.+Hons.+Clement+Attlee+and+Mackenzie+King+boarding+U.S.C.G.+SEQUOIA+for+discussions+about+the+atomic+bomb.+&ecopy;=c023269
NSC-68 courtesy of the US Government:
Image URL: https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/584/flashcards/1443584/gif/arms35_011335641957830.gif
U.S. Air Force document by Chief of Staff General Twining to his fellow Chiefs of Staff courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.
Image source unknown.
Signature star of David pattern for Soviet missile sites in Cuba courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.
Image URL: http://www.amesremote.com/images/usaf/cmc-1.jpg
Russian SOPs (Soviet ICBM Installation Signature) courtesy of the U.S. Government:
Website URL: http://www.amesremote.com/section1.htm
Missile launch room, Vandenburg airbase, 1962 courtesy of the U.S. Government.
Image source unknown.
Land-based nuclear missile launch:
Image URL: http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/mm3-1.jpg
Honest John Surface to Surface missile test courtesy of the U.S. Army:
Image URL: http://history.redstone.army.mil/miss/mhonestjohn.png
Image Credits (Images are for Educational and Non-Commercial Purposes Only):
Harry Truman portrait courtesy of the Canadian government:
Image URL: http://collectionscanada.gc.ca/pam_archives/index.php?fuseaction=genitem.displayEcopies〈=eng&rec;_nbr=3193181&title;=President+Harry+Truman+and+Rt.+Hons.+Clement+Attlee+and+Mackenzie+King+boarding+U.S.C.G.+SEQUOIA+for+discussions+about+the+atomic+bomb.+&ecopy;=c023269
NSC-68 courtesy of the US Government:
Image URL: https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/584/flashcards/1443584/gif/arms35_011335641957830.gif
U.S. Air Force document by Chief of Staff General Twining to his fellow Chiefs of Staff courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.
Image source unknown.
Signature star of David pattern for Soviet missile sites in Cuba courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.
Image URL: http://www.amesremote.com/images/usaf/cmc-1.jpg
Russian SOPs (Soviet ICBM Installation Signature) courtesy of the U.S. Government:
Website URL: http://www.amesremote.com/section1.htm
Missile launch room, Vandenburg airbase, 1962 courtesy of the U.S. Government.
Image source unknown.
Land-based nuclear missile launch:
Image URL: http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/mm3-1.jpg
Honest John Surface to Surface missile test courtesy of the U.S. Army:
Image URL: http://history.redstone.army.mil/miss/mhonestjohn.png
published:06 Mar 2015
views:1
Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker HD - PLAYTHROUGH - PART 16 - "Nuclear Deterrence"
You like the video? Subscribe! ► http://bit.ly/SubThatOneRebel55
Link to my channel
► http://www.youtube.com/user/ThatOneRebel55
Social Media Links!
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThatOneRebel55
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThatOneRebel55
►Email: AskThatOneRebel@gmail.com
Peace Walker is set in Costa Rica in November 1974, four years after the events of Portable Ops and ten years after Snake Eater. Snake (Big Boss) is running his own mercenary unit after he decided to break away from The Patriots group founded by Major Zero after learning of the Les Enfants Terribles Project. A mysterious group equipped with the latest weapons, called the Peace Sentinels (PS), has been deployed in-country. Despite the PS being equipped with the firepower equivalent to that of a land army, the Costa Rica government cannot do anything about them because the country's constitution does not allow the creation of an armed forces. The PS presence threatens to endanger the balance of power between the East and West.
I am currently using the Elgato Game Capture Card Device which allows me to record any console gaming console with HDMI connections or component cables. I highly recommended this gaming capture card for its simplicity, options such as livestreaming directly to Twitch and enabled to upload raw footage.
► Link to Elgato Game Capture Card Website
http://www.elgato.com/gaming/game-capture-hd
► MGS Peace Walker Playlist
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLay4hpN_xHE5w6S5OxRGLQfABx5vkXTLs
You like the video? Subscribe! ► http://bit.ly/SubThatOneRebel55
Link to my channel
► http://www.youtube.com/user/ThatOneRebel55
Social Media Links!
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThatOneRebel55
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThatOneRebel55
►Email: AskThatOneRebel@gmail.com
Peace Walker is set in Costa Rica in November 1974, four years after the events of Portable Ops and ten years after Snake Eater. Snake (Big Boss) is running his own mercenary unit after he decided to break away from The Patriots group founded by Major Zero after learning of the Les Enfants Terribles Project. A mysterious group equipped with the latest weapons, called the Peace Sentinels (PS), has been deployed in-country. Despite the PS being equipped with the firepower equivalent to that of a land army, the Costa Rica government cannot do anything about them because the country's constitution does not allow the creation of an armed forces. The PS presence threatens to endanger the balance of power between the East and West.
I am currently using the Elgato Game Capture Card Device which allows me to record any console gaming console with HDMI connections or component cables. I highly recommended this gaming capture card for its simplicity, options such as livestreaming directly to Twitch and enabled to upload raw footage.
► Link to Elgato Game Capture Card Website
http://www.elgato.com/gaming/game-capture-hd
► MGS Peace Walker Playlist
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLay4hpN_xHE5w6S5OxRGLQfABx5vkXTLs
Dr. Bill Wickersham, University of Missouri and Charles Atkins VFP Chapter, was interviewed by Dr. Dennis Mills about the myth of nuclear deterrence and why ...
Dr. Bill Wickersham, University of Missouri and Charles Atkins VFP Chapter, was interviewed by Dr. Dennis Mills about the myth of nuclear deterrence and why ...
A BIG thank you for you support for the work I do to Mr Duke WOW!
Ms. Pennye, Mr. Thrasher, Mr Duke Ms. Mattsson, Mr. McNaughton and Ms. Mann
God Blessing to you! :-) Hugs
Help support the work I do with a $1. PayPal donation
marygreeley54@gmail.com
Thank you God Bless You all. Hugs :-)
A BIG thank you for you support for the work I do to Mr Duke WOW!
Ms. Pennye, Mr. Thrasher, Mr Duke Ms. Mattsson, Mr. McNaughton and Ms. Mann
God Blessing to you! :-) Hugs
Help support the work I do with a $1. PayPal donation
marygreeley54@gmail.com
Thank you God Bless You all. Hugs :-)
Robert Greene, a former commander in the British Royal Navy who supervised nuclear weapons discusses some of his arguments against nuclear weapons as an effe...
Robert Greene, a former commander in the British Royal Navy who supervised nuclear weapons discusses some of his arguments against nuclear weapons as an effe...
Retired Indian Army Lt. Gen. Vinay Shankar, who is currently a member of the Council of the United Service Institution of India, talks about the origins of I...
Retired Indian Army Lt. Gen. Vinay Shankar, who is currently a member of the Council of the United Service Institution of India, talks about the origins of I...
Independent scholar Ward Wilson took the 2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge Essay Contest grand prize of $10000 with his impressive and...
24:46
BBC HARDtalk: Nuclear Deterrent Discussion with Kate Hudson and Douglas Murray
BBC HARDtalk: Nuclear Deterrent Discussion with Kate Hudson and Douglas Murray
BBC HARDtalk: Nuclear Deterrent Discussion with Kate Hudson and Douglas Murray
111:16
Sustaining Nuclear Deterrence After New START
Sustaining Nuclear Deterrence After New START
Sustaining Nuclear Deterrence After New START
The subcommittee met to receive testimony on sustaining nuclear deterrence after New START.
22:43
Address to the Nation on Strategic Arms Reduction and Nuclear Deterrence — 11/22/82
Address to the Nation on Strategic Arms Reduction and Nuclear Deterrence — 11/22/82
Address to the Nation on Strategic Arms Reduction and Nuclear Deterrence — 11/22/82
For more information on the ongoing works of President Reagan's Foundation, please visit http://www.reaganfoundation.org.
80:34
'The Day After' Nuclear War/Deterrence Discussion Panel - ABC News 'Viewpoint' (November 20 1983)
'The Day After' Nuclear War/Deterrence Discussion Panel - ABC News 'Viewpoint' (November 20 1983)
'The Day After' Nuclear War/Deterrence Discussion Panel - ABC News 'Viewpoint' (November 20 1983)
My blog: http://marcriley.wordpress.com
My twitter: @MarcDRiley
CREDIT: This video file has been created from files found and acquired from the Museum of Classic Chicago Television (http://fuzzymemories.tv/), an organization dedicated to the preservation of Chicago television broadcasts from years gone by. My thanks go out to them. Posted with permission.
INFO: This video is a discussion panel from the ABC News panel discussion program 'Viewpoint', moderated by Ted Koppel, from November 20 1983. This episode focuses, narrowly speaking, on the then-recently aired nuclear war television movie 'The Day After' (information on it can be found on
53:14
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, will speak on the maintenance of US strategic nuclear deterrence and the enduring role of the US nuclear triad....
21:11
Thomas Schelling, Professor of National Security at University of Maryland
Thomas Schelling, Professor of National Security at University of Maryland
Thomas Schelling, Professor of National Security at University of Maryland
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear deterrence and game theory during the Cold War. Schelling, aged 92, is a U.S. economist and professor of foreign affairs, national security, nuclear strategy and arms control at the University of Maryland, United States. From 1948 to 1953, Schelling served with the Marshall Plan in Europe, then the White House, and the Executive Office of the President. Later Schelling joined the Department of Economics at Yale University before being appointed Professor of Economics at Harvard and then at
72:35
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
The ECSSR organized a lecture – Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities – delivered by Haider Mullick, Adjunct Professor, Naval War College, United...
80:02
The Wisdom of Foolishness: Taking on Nuclear Deterrence
The Wisdom of Foolishness: Taking on Nuclear Deterrence
The Wisdom of Foolishness: Taking on Nuclear Deterrence
Martin E. Hellman is Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. His effort to "Defuse the Nuclear Threat," (see NuclearRisk.org) in...
60:50
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011. Michael Quinlan's care...
30:49
The Sons Play Fallout Tale of Two Wastelands! Nuclear Deterrence! - Part 56 - Sons Of Vidya
The Sons Play Fallout Tale of Two Wastelands! Nuclear Deterrence! - Part 56 - Sons Of Vidya
The Sons Play Fallout Tale of Two Wastelands! Nuclear Deterrence! - Part 56 - Sons Of Vidya
Who knows more about geopolitics than us?
►Email us! Sonsofvidya@gmail.com
►Twitch: twitch.tv/sonsofvidya
►The Podcast: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
►Our Twitter: https://twitter.com/SonsofVidya
76:08
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
As part of the Nuclear Crossroads Initiative, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk entitled "Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways and Best U.S. Responses" by Jasen J. Castillo, associate professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service, on Nov. 20, 2014.
Iran's possible drive to acquire nuclear weapons has raised alarm bells in several international capitals. The prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran highlights a growing strategic problem for the United States. If Iran establishes itself as a nuclear p
78:22
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
20:57
"The Reform of Nuclear Deterrence" — Dr. Tom Nichols
"The Reform of Nuclear Deterrence" — Dr. Tom Nichols
"The Reform of Nuclear Deterrence" — Dr. Tom Nichols
21:10
Panel - The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Global Powers
Panel - The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Global Powers
Panel - The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Global Powers
"Complex Nonconventional Deterrence Equations", The 2014 Annual Arms Control Conference, INSS Arms Control and Regional Security Program and Fondation pour l...
Independent scholar Ward Wilson took the 2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge Essay Contest grand prize of $10000 with his impressive and...
Independent scholar Ward Wilson took the 2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge Essay Contest grand prize of $10000 with his impressive and...
My blog: http://marcriley.wordpress.com
My twitter: @MarcDRiley
CREDIT: This video file has been created from files found and acquired from the Museum of Classic Chicago Television (http://fuzzymemories.tv/), an organization dedicated to the preservation of Chicago television broadcasts from years gone by. My thanks go out to them. Posted with permission.
INFO: This video is a discussion panel from the ABC News panel discussion program 'Viewpoint', moderated by Ted Koppel, from November 20 1983. This episode focuses, narrowly speaking, on the then-recently aired nuclear war television movie 'The Day After' (information on it can be found on Wikipedia). However, I don't feel one needs to see the TV Movie to follow/understand this discussion. More broadly speaking, though, the discussion focuses on topics such as nuclear war, nuclear deterrence, and the then-present tensions between the East and West in the midst of what was a very tense and dangerous part of the Cold War. I found this to be an insightful and intriguing look into an era gone by that, I feel, can never really be truly and totally understood (in terms of what living in it was like) by those who were born after it had passed - myself included.
The panel, moderated by Ted Koppel, consists of (in no particular order):
- Carl Sagan (notable and distinguished scientist and an authority on the topic of Nuclear Winter)
- William F. Buckley Jr. (noted conservative political commentator, publisher of the National Review)
- Robert S. McNamara (United States Secretary of Defense to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson)
- Henry Kissinger (National Security Adviser and later Secretary of State for President Richard Nixon)
- Brent Scowcroft (National Security Adviser for President Gerald Ford, and later National Security Adviser for President George H.W. Bush)
- Elie Wiesel (Nobel Peace Prize recipient and Holocaust survivor)
and a brief interview with George Shultz (then-Secretary of State to President Ronald Reagan at the time of the broadcast)
Again, this panel is extremely intriguing into the subject of nuclear war, the effects of it, the danger of it, nuclear deterrence and how it connects to the former subjects, tensions between the East and West, and various other things - all within the context of a time where all of these things were very present, very real realities that everyone living in that time had to live with and accept. I hope it's as intriguing to you all as it was to me.
My blog: http://marcriley.wordpress.com
My twitter: @MarcDRiley
CREDIT: This video file has been created from files found and acquired from the Museum of Classic Chicago Television (http://fuzzymemories.tv/), an organization dedicated to the preservation of Chicago television broadcasts from years gone by. My thanks go out to them. Posted with permission.
INFO: This video is a discussion panel from the ABC News panel discussion program 'Viewpoint', moderated by Ted Koppel, from November 20 1983. This episode focuses, narrowly speaking, on the then-recently aired nuclear war television movie 'The Day After' (information on it can be found on Wikipedia). However, I don't feel one needs to see the TV Movie to follow/understand this discussion. More broadly speaking, though, the discussion focuses on topics such as nuclear war, nuclear deterrence, and the then-present tensions between the East and West in the midst of what was a very tense and dangerous part of the Cold War. I found this to be an insightful and intriguing look into an era gone by that, I feel, can never really be truly and totally understood (in terms of what living in it was like) by those who were born after it had passed - myself included.
The panel, moderated by Ted Koppel, consists of (in no particular order):
- Carl Sagan (notable and distinguished scientist and an authority on the topic of Nuclear Winter)
- William F. Buckley Jr. (noted conservative political commentator, publisher of the National Review)
- Robert S. McNamara (United States Secretary of Defense to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson)
- Henry Kissinger (National Security Adviser and later Secretary of State for President Richard Nixon)
- Brent Scowcroft (National Security Adviser for President Gerald Ford, and later National Security Adviser for President George H.W. Bush)
- Elie Wiesel (Nobel Peace Prize recipient and Holocaust survivor)
and a brief interview with George Shultz (then-Secretary of State to President Ronald Reagan at the time of the broadcast)
Again, this panel is extremely intriguing into the subject of nuclear war, the effects of it, the danger of it, nuclear deterrence and how it connects to the former subjects, tensions between the East and West, and various other things - all within the context of a time where all of these things were very present, very real realities that everyone living in that time had to live with and accept. I hope it's as intriguing to you all as it was to me.
published:26 Nov 2013
views:15149
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, will speak on the maintenance of US strategic nuclear deterrence and the enduring role of the US nuclear triad....
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, will speak on the maintenance of US strategic nuclear deterrence and the enduring role of the US nuclear triad....
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear deterrence and game theory during the Cold War. Schelling, aged 92, is a U.S. economist and professor of foreign affairs, national security, nuclear strategy and arms control at the University of Maryland, United States. From 1948 to 1953, Schelling served with the Marshall Plan in Europe, then the White House, and the Executive Office of the President. Later Schelling joined the Department of Economics at Yale University before being appointed Professor of Economics at Harvard and then at Maryland. In 1993, Schelling received the Award for Behavior Research Relevant to the Prevention of Nuclear War from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Schelling also received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2005 for his research on game theory.
---
Schelling was interviewed by CTBTO Spokesperson Annika Thunborg in Vienna in November 2012. An advocate of nuclear deterrence, Schelling explains how nuclear weapons policies developed in the first decades of the Cold War. He shares his impressions of the impact of nuclear bombings at the end of World War II and how memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki played a role during the Korean War. He also stresses the importance of game theory when promoting cooperation in disarmament.
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear deterrence and game theory during the Cold War. Schelling, aged 92, is a U.S. economist and professor of foreign affairs, national security, nuclear strategy and arms control at the University of Maryland, United States. From 1948 to 1953, Schelling served with the Marshall Plan in Europe, then the White House, and the Executive Office of the President. Later Schelling joined the Department of Economics at Yale University before being appointed Professor of Economics at Harvard and then at Maryland. In 1993, Schelling received the Award for Behavior Research Relevant to the Prevention of Nuclear War from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Schelling also received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2005 for his research on game theory.
---
Schelling was interviewed by CTBTO Spokesperson Annika Thunborg in Vienna in November 2012. An advocate of nuclear deterrence, Schelling explains how nuclear weapons policies developed in the first decades of the Cold War. He shares his impressions of the impact of nuclear bombings at the end of World War II and how memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki played a role during the Korean War. He also stresses the importance of game theory when promoting cooperation in disarmament.
published:06 May 2013
views:3193
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
The ECSSR organized a lecture – Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities – delivered by Haider Mullick, Adjunct Professor, Naval War College, United...
The ECSSR organized a lecture – Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities – delivered by Haider Mullick, Adjunct Professor, Naval War College, United...
Martin E. Hellman is Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. His effort to "Defuse the Nuclear Threat," (see NuclearRisk.org) in...
Martin E. Hellman is Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. His effort to "Defuse the Nuclear Threat," (see NuclearRisk.org) in...
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011. Michael Quinlan's care...
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011. Michael Quinlan's care...
Who knows more about geopolitics than us?
►Email us! Sonsofvidya@gmail.com
►Twitch: twitch.tv/sonsofvidya
►The Podcast: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
►Our Twitter: https://twitter.com/SonsofVidya
Who knows more about geopolitics than us?
►Email us! Sonsofvidya@gmail.com
►Twitch: twitch.tv/sonsofvidya
►The Podcast: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
►Our Twitter: https://twitter.com/SonsofVidya
published:23 Mar 2015
views:41
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
As part of the Nuclear Crossroads Initiative, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk entitled "Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways and Best U.S. Responses" by Jasen J. Castillo, associate professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service, on Nov. 20, 2014.
Iran's possible drive to acquire nuclear weapons has raised alarm bells in several international capitals. The prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran highlights a growing strategic problem for the United States. If Iran establishes itself as a nuclear power, as North Korea did a few years ago, then the United States will confront yet one more country capable of countering its formidable conventional military capabilities. Not only will the U.S. need to consider the conventional balance when planning for regional intervention, but it will also need to evaluate the balance of nuclear forces. Any U.S effort to defend its friends and allies, therefore, must begin by asking how and under what conditions these potential adversaries might use their nuclear weapons in a confrontation. To better understand these problems, this paper addresses the following questions: What strategies could regional nuclear powers adopt to deter nuclear attacks? Similarly, what strategies could they pursue to deter conventional attacks before or during a conflict? What is the likelihood of nuclear escalation during a conventional conflict with regional powers? Finally, how should the U.S. respond to the first-use of nuclear weapons during a conventional conflict?
Jasen J. Castillo is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service. He came to the Bush School after serving on the staff of the Policy Planning Office in the U.S. Department of Defense.
As part of the Nuclear Crossroads Initiative, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk entitled "Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways and Best U.S. Responses" by Jasen J. Castillo, associate professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service, on Nov. 20, 2014.
Iran's possible drive to acquire nuclear weapons has raised alarm bells in several international capitals. The prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran highlights a growing strategic problem for the United States. If Iran establishes itself as a nuclear power, as North Korea did a few years ago, then the United States will confront yet one more country capable of countering its formidable conventional military capabilities. Not only will the U.S. need to consider the conventional balance when planning for regional intervention, but it will also need to evaluate the balance of nuclear forces. Any U.S effort to defend its friends and allies, therefore, must begin by asking how and under what conditions these potential adversaries might use their nuclear weapons in a confrontation. To better understand these problems, this paper addresses the following questions: What strategies could regional nuclear powers adopt to deter nuclear attacks? Similarly, what strategies could they pursue to deter conventional attacks before or during a conflict? What is the likelihood of nuclear escalation during a conventional conflict with regional powers? Finally, how should the U.S. respond to the first-use of nuclear weapons during a conventional conflict?
Jasen J. Castillo is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service. He came to the Bush School after serving on the staff of the Policy Planning Office in the U.S. Department of Defense.
published:13 Feb 2015
views:15
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
"Complex Nonconventional Deterrence Equations", The 2014 Annual Arms Control Conference, INSS Arms Control and Regional Security Program and Fondation pour l...
"Complex Nonconventional Deterrence Equations", The 2014 Annual Arms Control Conference, INSS Arms Control and Regional Security Program and Fondation pour l...
Urdu/Nat
Amid escalating tensions with India, Pakistan is approaching the first anniversary of its nuclear tests.
And one year after declaring itself a nuclear power, the question facing Pakistan seems to be not whether to deploy nuclear weapons, but rather, officials say, how many would constitute a "minimum nuclear deterrence".
Pakistan detonated its devices on May 28 and May 30 last year in response to India's tests, which were conducted two weeks earlier.
The tit-for-tat tests generated global concerns of a runaway nuclear arms race on the volatile South Asian subcontinent, the arena of three wars in 52 years.
Pakistani Prime Ministe
6:19
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3.
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
3:24
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3
200:39
Extended Deterrence in Europe/NATO
Extended Deterrence in Europe/NATO
Extended Deterrence in Europe/NATO
Featuring Dr. Jim Tegnelia, former Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Dr. Rich Wagner, Nonresident Senior Advisor at CSIS NATO's culminating.
Panel İ: The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Regional Challenges Chair: Brig. Gen. (ret.) Shlomo Brom (INSS) Speaker: Dr. Bruno Tertrais (FRS) Complex Nonco.
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear de.
On November 12, the Transatlantic Security Initiative in the Atlantic Council's Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security hosted a conference on NATO'.
0:09
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/qcpwjwc
Despite not having been used in anger since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the atomic bomb is still the biggest threat that faces us in the 21st century. As Bill Clinton's first secretary of defense, Les Aspin, aptly put it, "The Cold War is over, the Soviet Union is no more. But the post-Cold War world is decidedly not post-nuclear." For all the effort to reduce nuclear stockpiles to zero, it seems that the bomb is here to stay. This Very Short Introduction reveals why. The history and politics of the bomb are explained: from the technology of nuclear weapons, to the revolutionary implications o
49:07
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range bal
56:29
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range balli
71:01
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
28:36
In The Fight: Episode 98
In The Fight: Episode 98
In The Fight: Episode 98
In this episode of In The Fight, the U.S. Air Force combines live training and virtual training in one major exercise, service members ride home from Operation Atlantic Resolve in the longest convoy since World War II, Global Strike Command trains for nuclear deterrence, the California National Guard gears up for wildfire season, and civil affairs Soldiers in Djibouti help local kids get a kick out of soccer.
GO TO THE FRONTLINES: More videos at http://www.militaryvideos.com
A decision not to renew the UK's nuclear deterrent would be "irresponsible folly", a group of ex-senior military officials has said.
In a letter to The Times, 20 former defence chiefs said to "abandon" Britain's four Trident submarines would be "an enormous gamble" which could threaten "the survival of our nation".
Among the signatories are two retired defence secretaries and GCHQ directors.
A decision on whether to renew Trident is due to be taken in 2016.
On Tuesday, Labour's shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker said his party was committed to renewing all four Trident submarines if it wins the election.
The Conservatives have also commit
Concern about the humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons has provided one of the sharpest intellectual challenges to nuclear deterrence in recent decades. Although the United Kingdom and the United States sent representatives to the most recent international conference on the subject, the nuclear-weapon states have generally been reluctant to respond. Do nuclear weapon states fail to appreciate the consequences of nuclear use? Moreover, what implications do these consequences have for policy? Specifically, are there circumstances under which the use of nuclear weapons could still be consistent with both international law and
1:51
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
--= THE SYNOPSIS OF YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =---
Where to buy this book?
ISBN: 9780275980986
Book Synopsis of Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making of International Strategy by David G. Coleman
If you want to add where to buy this book, please use the link above:
http://www.justasummary.com/wheretobuy/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
If you are the Author, Publisher or Partner and want to send us a message, use this link:
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Report an error:
http://www.justasummary.com/reportanerror/?param
55:40
Nuclear Weapons and European Security - Part 2
Nuclear Weapons and European Security - Part 2
Nuclear Weapons and European Security - Part 2
Speakers
Dr. Bruno Tertrais
Senior Research Fellow at the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FRS), the leading French think tank on international security issues. His past positions include Special Assistant to the Director of Strategic Affairs, French Ministry of Defense; Visiting Fellow, RAND Corporation; and Director, Civilian Affairs Committee, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. He has published widely on International Relations and Geopolitics, Conflicts, US Strategy, Transatlantic Relations, Security in the Middle East, Security in Asia, Nuclear Proliferation, Nuclear Deterrence, and Military Strategy.
Dr. Nikolai Sokov
Senior Fellow
International constraint and mutual nuclear deterrence may have prevented all-out war with Pakistan in the past over contested Kashmir. With thousands fleeing their homes amid escalating violence, that may not remain a secure wager.
Rising tension at the Line of Control (LoC) between India and Pakistan is putting in question the widely-held assumption that their conflict will not escalate to an all-out conventional or even nuclear war. International concern has extended to the US, previously resistant to mediating in the Kashmir dispute.
Past military crises between India and Pakistan remained at the brink of all-out war because of internati
11:33
Oral defense: Why New Nuclear Deterrence Practice is Needed?
Oral defense: Why New Nuclear Deterrence Practice is Needed?
Oral defense: Why New Nuclear Deterrence Practice is Needed?
Final fusion process for week 12 assignment: oral defense.
Urdu/Nat
Amid escalating tensions with India, Pakistan is approaching the first anniversary of its nuclear tests.
And one year after declaring itself a nuclear power, the question facing Pakistan seems to be not whether to deploy nuclear weapons, but rather, officials say, how many would constitute a "minimum nuclear deterrence".
Pakistan detonated its devices on May 28 and May 30 last year in response to India's tests, which were conducted two weeks earlier.
The tit-for-tat tests generated global concerns of a runaway nuclear arms race on the volatile South Asian subcontinent, the arena of three wars in 52 years.
Pakistani Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif declaring his country a nuclear power on state television.
On May 28th 1998 Pakistan carried out five underground nuclear tests in Baluchistan, in response to test by India carried out two weeks previously.
A few days later a sixth test took place in Pakistan - a show of strength against arch rival India.
At the time Sharif said he had no choice but to carry out the detonations because India was posing a threat to his nation's security.
SOUNDBITE: (Urdu)
"Today God has given us the power in order to save our kingdom from danger. It was the final solution which we had to do. In 1974 when India first carried out an atom bomb explosion - we did not have all the know how then. This nuclear test saved us from a new danger."
SUPER CAPTION: Nawaz Sharif, Pakistani Prime Minister
Pakistan claims India has been a threat to its security since independence in 1947.
The state of Kashmir, the flashpoint of two previous wars between India and Pakistan, remains the trouble spot between the two nuclear nations.
The international community has been called on to help find a solution to the issue.
Both Pakistan and India lay claim to a united Kashmir, which was split between the two countries after the British left the region.
And tensions between the two neighbours have escalated this week following airstrikes over Kashmir by India, which is vowing to push out Pakistan-backed guerrillas who it says seized Indian posts.
One year on from its nuclear tests, Islamabad says they have done more good than bad.
SOUNDBITE: (English)
"The nuclear tests were very positive for Pakistan and a plus for peace in South Asia. Pakistan now feels more secure with India there is a stable balance of power between India and Pakistan the threat of war has receded and the two countries can now talk to each other on the basis equality and parity. The nuclear tests have also helped to internationalise the Kashmir question, that is also very important because Kashmir is part of the U-N agenda and the people of Pakistan now feel more confident, more assured and they have more faith in the future."
SUPER CAPTION: Mushahid Hussain, Information Minister
Support from the Pakistani people was overwhelming at the time of the underground nuclear tests.
People were seen celebrating out on the streets.
But they, along with India, suffered worldwide condemnation, and the U-S imposed economic sanctions.
These were later lifted.
Financial experts say the country's economy is on the mend.
SOUNDBITE: (English)
"I thin the IMF package Pakistan managed to get towards the end of last year and the beginning of this year together with the resumption of Financial assistance and the external debt rescheduling by the Paris and London clubs , I think that is a silver lining to be a positive development. If Pakistan can sustain the reform effort I think on balance it has strengthened the economy."
SUPER CAPTION: Saqib Sherani, Economic expert
Relations between India and Pakistan were expected to deteriorate even further as time went on.
But it didn't take long for the weapons games to start up again.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9d2b624433d324a954d8dd4548593508
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
Urdu/Nat
Amid escalating tensions with India, Pakistan is approaching the first anniversary of its nuclear tests.
And one year after declaring itself a nuclear power, the question facing Pakistan seems to be not whether to deploy nuclear weapons, but rather, officials say, how many would constitute a "minimum nuclear deterrence".
Pakistan detonated its devices on May 28 and May 30 last year in response to India's tests, which were conducted two weeks earlier.
The tit-for-tat tests generated global concerns of a runaway nuclear arms race on the volatile South Asian subcontinent, the arena of three wars in 52 years.
Pakistani Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif declaring his country a nuclear power on state television.
On May 28th 1998 Pakistan carried out five underground nuclear tests in Baluchistan, in response to test by India carried out two weeks previously.
A few days later a sixth test took place in Pakistan - a show of strength against arch rival India.
At the time Sharif said he had no choice but to carry out the detonations because India was posing a threat to his nation's security.
SOUNDBITE: (Urdu)
"Today God has given us the power in order to save our kingdom from danger. It was the final solution which we had to do. In 1974 when India first carried out an atom bomb explosion - we did not have all the know how then. This nuclear test saved us from a new danger."
SUPER CAPTION: Nawaz Sharif, Pakistani Prime Minister
Pakistan claims India has been a threat to its security since independence in 1947.
The state of Kashmir, the flashpoint of two previous wars between India and Pakistan, remains the trouble spot between the two nuclear nations.
The international community has been called on to help find a solution to the issue.
Both Pakistan and India lay claim to a united Kashmir, which was split between the two countries after the British left the region.
And tensions between the two neighbours have escalated this week following airstrikes over Kashmir by India, which is vowing to push out Pakistan-backed guerrillas who it says seized Indian posts.
One year on from its nuclear tests, Islamabad says they have done more good than bad.
SOUNDBITE: (English)
"The nuclear tests were very positive for Pakistan and a plus for peace in South Asia. Pakistan now feels more secure with India there is a stable balance of power between India and Pakistan the threat of war has receded and the two countries can now talk to each other on the basis equality and parity. The nuclear tests have also helped to internationalise the Kashmir question, that is also very important because Kashmir is part of the U-N agenda and the people of Pakistan now feel more confident, more assured and they have more faith in the future."
SUPER CAPTION: Mushahid Hussain, Information Minister
Support from the Pakistani people was overwhelming at the time of the underground nuclear tests.
People were seen celebrating out on the streets.
But they, along with India, suffered worldwide condemnation, and the U-S imposed economic sanctions.
These were later lifted.
Financial experts say the country's economy is on the mend.
SOUNDBITE: (English)
"I thin the IMF package Pakistan managed to get towards the end of last year and the beginning of this year together with the resumption of Financial assistance and the external debt rescheduling by the Paris and London clubs , I think that is a silver lining to be a positive development. If Pakistan can sustain the reform effort I think on balance it has strengthened the economy."
SUPER CAPTION: Saqib Sherani, Economic expert
Relations between India and Pakistan were expected to deteriorate even further as time went on.
But it didn't take long for the weapons games to start up again.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9d2b624433d324a954d8dd4548593508
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:28 Jul 2015
views:1
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3.
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3.
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
published:16 Jul 2015
views:1
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Featuring Dr. Jim Tegnelia, former Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Dr. Rich Wagner, Nonresident Senior Advisor at CSIS NATO's culminating.
Panel İ: The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Regional Challenges Chair: Brig. Gen. (ret.) Shlomo Brom (INSS) Speaker: Dr. Bruno Tertrais (FRS) Complex Nonco.
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear de.
On November 12, the Transatlantic Security Initiative in the Atlantic Council's Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security hosted a conference on NATO'.
Featuring Dr. Jim Tegnelia, former Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Dr. Rich Wagner, Nonresident Senior Advisor at CSIS NATO's culminating.
Panel İ: The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Regional Challenges Chair: Brig. Gen. (ret.) Shlomo Brom (INSS) Speaker: Dr. Bruno Tertrais (FRS) Complex Nonco.
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear de.
On November 12, the Transatlantic Security Initiative in the Atlantic Council's Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security hosted a conference on NATO'.
published:11 Jul 2015
views:2
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/qcpwjwc
Despite not having been used in anger since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the atomic bomb is still the biggest threat that faces us in the 21st century. As Bill Clinton's first secretary of defense, Les Aspin, aptly put it, "The Cold War is over, the Soviet Union is no more. But the post-Cold War world is decidedly not post-nuclear." For all the effort to reduce nuclear stockpiles to zero, it seems that the bomb is here to stay. This Very Short Introduction reveals why. The history and politics of the bomb are explained: from the technology of nuclear weapons, to the revolutionary implications of the H-bomb, and the politics of nuclear deterrence. The issues are set against a backdrop of the changing international landscape, from the early days of development through the Cold War.In this new edition, Joseph M. Siracusa includes a new concluding chapter, moving away from the emphasis of nuclear weapons in the "age of terrorism", to the significant lessons to be learnt from the history of the nuclear weapons era. Siracusa shows that because 21st century nuclear proliferation has deep roots in the past, an understanding of the lessons of this nuclear history is paramount for future global policies to be successful.ABOUT THE SERIES:The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area. These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable.
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/qcpwjwc
Despite not having been used in anger since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the atomic bomb is still the biggest threat that faces us in the 21st century. As Bill Clinton's first secretary of defense, Les Aspin, aptly put it, "The Cold War is over, the Soviet Union is no more. But the post-Cold War world is decidedly not post-nuclear." For all the effort to reduce nuclear stockpiles to zero, it seems that the bomb is here to stay. This Very Short Introduction reveals why. The history and politics of the bomb are explained: from the technology of nuclear weapons, to the revolutionary implications of the H-bomb, and the politics of nuclear deterrence. The issues are set against a backdrop of the changing international landscape, from the early days of development through the Cold War.In this new edition, Joseph M. Siracusa includes a new concluding chapter, moving away from the emphasis of nuclear weapons in the "age of terrorism", to the significant lessons to be learnt from the history of the nuclear weapons era. Siracusa shows that because 21st century nuclear proliferation has deep roots in the past, an understanding of the lessons of this nuclear history is paramount for future global policies to be successful.ABOUT THE SERIES:The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area. These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable.
published:19 Jun 2015
views:0
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But this reliance on conventional means is likely to produce the opposite outcome of what its advocates intend. Rather than stability, such a world is likely to be characterized by destabilizing arms races and an increased likelihood of great power war – particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. After all, in Europe and especially Asia, the history of conventional deterrence and formal arms control agreements since 1500 is rife with failure. Drawing upon such challenges, Dr. Leah will advance the argument that nuclear weapons, in sufficient numbers and deployed in a wide spectrum of delivery systems, remain a necessary component of international security.
Leah is a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Grand Strategy Program at Yale University. Previously, she was a Stanton Postdoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Security at MIT, a visiting fellow at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, a summer research fellow at RAND, and a research intern at IISS-Asia, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, IISS-London, the French Ministry of Defense, and the UMP office of Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy. She is the author of Australia and the Bomb, and has published in Comparative Strategy, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Asian Security, the Australian Journal of International Affairs, The National Interest, and with RSIS and RAND.
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But this reliance on conventional means is likely to produce the opposite outcome of what its advocates intend. Rather than stability, such a world is likely to be characterized by destabilizing arms races and an increased likelihood of great power war – particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. After all, in Europe and especially Asia, the history of conventional deterrence and formal arms control agreements since 1500 is rife with failure. Drawing upon such challenges, Dr. Leah will advance the argument that nuclear weapons, in sufficient numbers and deployed in a wide spectrum of delivery systems, remain a necessary component of international security.
Leah is a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Grand Strategy Program at Yale University. Previously, she was a Stanton Postdoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Security at MIT, a visiting fellow at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, a summer research fellow at RAND, and a research intern at IISS-Asia, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, IISS-London, the French Ministry of Defense, and the UMP office of Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy. She is the author of Australia and the Bomb, and has published in Comparative Strategy, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Asian Security, the Australian Journal of International Affairs, The National Interest, and with RSIS and RAND.
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
published:30 May 2015
views:0
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But this reliance on conventional means is likely to produce the opposite outcome of what its advocates intend. Rather than stability, such a world is likely to be characterized by destabilizing arms races and an increased likelihood of great power war – particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. After all, in Europe and especially Asia, the history of conventional deterrence and formal arms control agreements since 1500 is rife with failure. Drawing upon such challenges, Dr. Leah will advance the argument that nuclear weapons, in sufficient numbers and deployed in a wide spectrum of delivery systems, remain a necessary component of international security.
Leah is a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Grand Strategy Program at Yale University. Previously, she was a Stanton Postdoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Security at MIT, a visiting fellow at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, a summer research fellow at RAND, and a research intern at IISS-Asia, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, IISS-London, the French Ministry of Defense, and the UMP office of Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy. She is the author of Australia and the Bomb, and has published in Comparative Strategy, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Asian Security, the Australian Journal of International Affairs, The National Interest, and with RSIS and RAND.
The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But this reliance on conventional means is likely to produce the opposite outcome of what its advocates intend. Rather than stability, such a world is likely to be characterized by destabilizing arms races and an increased likelihood of great power war – particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. After all, in Europe and especially Asia, the history of conventional deterrence and formal arms control agreements since 1500 is rife with failure. Drawing upon such challenges, Dr. Leah will advance the argument that nuclear weapons, in sufficient numbers and deployed in a wide spectrum of delivery systems, remain a necessary component of international security.
Leah is a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Grand Strategy Program at Yale University. Previously, she was a Stanton Postdoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Security at MIT, a visiting fellow at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, a summer research fellow at RAND, and a research intern at IISS-Asia, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, IISS-London, the French Ministry of Defense, and the UMP office of Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy. She is the author of Australia and the Bomb, and has published in Comparative Strategy, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Asian Security, the Australian Journal of International Affairs, The National Interest, and with RSIS and RAND.
published:27 May 2015
views:13
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
In this episode of In The Fight, the U.S. Air Force combines live training and virtual training in one major exercise, service members ride home from Operation Atlantic Resolve in the longest convoy since World War II, Global Strike Command trains for nuclear deterrence, the California National Guard gears up for wildfire season, and civil affairs Soldiers in Djibouti help local kids get a kick out of soccer.
GO TO THE FRONTLINES: More videos at http://www.militaryvideos.com
In this episode of In The Fight, the U.S. Air Force combines live training and virtual training in one major exercise, service members ride home from Operation Atlantic Resolve in the longest convoy since World War II, Global Strike Command trains for nuclear deterrence, the California National Guard gears up for wildfire season, and civil affairs Soldiers in Djibouti help local kids get a kick out of soccer.
GO TO THE FRONTLINES: More videos at http://www.militaryvideos.com
A decision not to renew the UK's nuclear deterrent would be "irresponsible folly", a group of ex-senior military officials has said.
In a letter to The Times, 20 former defence chiefs said to "abandon" Britain's four Trident submarines would be "an enormous gamble" which could threaten "the survival of our nation".
Among the signatories are two retired defence secretaries and GCHQ directors.
A decision on whether to renew Trident is due to be taken in 2016.
On Tuesday, Labour's shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker said his party was committed to renewing all four Trident submarines if it wins the election.
The Conservatives have also committed to renewing all four missile submarines, while the Liberal Democrats favour cutting to three.
The SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens want Trident to be scrapped.
UKIP has said it would not scrap Trident, but would consider cutting back to three submarines.
'Irrevocable decision'
Among those who have signed the letter are Labour's Lord Robertson, a former defence secretary and Nato chief, and retired chief of the general staff General Sir Mike Jackson.
Three previous heads of the armed forces, three ex-Royal Navy chiefs, and two former GCHQ directors are also among the signatories.
The open letter addressed to "the incoming Prime Minister 2015" said a decision not to renew the fleet would "effectively end Britain's nuclear deterrent", and would be "irrevocable".
"To abandon Trident now and for good in the hope that no threat will emerge would be to take an enormous gamble on behalf of generations not yet born," they said.
"In an uncertain world where some powers are now displaying a worrying faith in nuclear weapons as an instrument of policy and influence, it would be irresponsible folly to abandon Britain's own independent deterrent."
The decision would affect "the security and ultimately the survival of our nation", they said.
The UK had made reductions in its nuclear arsenal proportionately greater than any other nuclear weapons power, which represented "a huge contribution towards nuclear disarmament", the letter said.
"We should stand ready to do more, but only if it can be proved that it does not compromise minimum levels of nuclear deterrence," it added.
A decision not to renew the UK's nuclear deterrent would be "irresponsible folly", a group of ex-senior military officials has said.
In a letter to The Times, 20 former defence chiefs said to "abandon" Britain's four Trident submarines would be "an enormous gamble" which could threaten "the survival of our nation".
Among the signatories are two retired defence secretaries and GCHQ directors.
A decision on whether to renew Trident is due to be taken in 2016.
On Tuesday, Labour's shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker said his party was committed to renewing all four Trident submarines if it wins the election.
The Conservatives have also committed to renewing all four missile submarines, while the Liberal Democrats favour cutting to three.
The SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens want Trident to be scrapped.
UKIP has said it would not scrap Trident, but would consider cutting back to three submarines.
'Irrevocable decision'
Among those who have signed the letter are Labour's Lord Robertson, a former defence secretary and Nato chief, and retired chief of the general staff General Sir Mike Jackson.
Three previous heads of the armed forces, three ex-Royal Navy chiefs, and two former GCHQ directors are also among the signatories.
The open letter addressed to "the incoming Prime Minister 2015" said a decision not to renew the fleet would "effectively end Britain's nuclear deterrent", and would be "irrevocable".
"To abandon Trident now and for good in the hope that no threat will emerge would be to take an enormous gamble on behalf of generations not yet born," they said.
"In an uncertain world where some powers are now displaying a worrying faith in nuclear weapons as an instrument of policy and influence, it would be irresponsible folly to abandon Britain's own independent deterrent."
The decision would affect "the security and ultimately the survival of our nation", they said.
The UK had made reductions in its nuclear arsenal proportionately greater than any other nuclear weapons power, which represented "a huge contribution towards nuclear disarmament", the letter said.
"We should stand ready to do more, but only if it can be proved that it does not compromise minimum levels of nuclear deterrence," it added.
Concern about the humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons has provided one of the sharpest intellectual challenges to nuclear deterrence in recent decades. Although the United Kingdom and the United States sent representatives to the most recent international conference on the subject, the nuclear-weapon states have generally been reluctant to respond. Do nuclear weapon states fail to appreciate the consequences of nuclear use? Moreover, what implications do these consequences have for policy? Specifically, are there circumstances under which the use of nuclear weapons could still be consistent with both international law and morality in spite of the consequences?
Concern about the humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons has provided one of the sharpest intellectual challenges to nuclear deterrence in recent decades. Although the United Kingdom and the United States sent representatives to the most recent international conference on the subject, the nuclear-weapon states have generally been reluctant to respond. Do nuclear weapon states fail to appreciate the consequences of nuclear use? Moreover, what implications do these consequences have for policy? Specifically, are there circumstances under which the use of nuclear weapons could still be consistent with both international law and morality in spite of the consequences?
published:24 Mar 2015
views:11
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
--= THE SYNOPSIS OF YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =---
Where to buy this book?
ISBN: 9780275980986
Book Synopsis of Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making of International Strategy by David G. Coleman
If you want to add where to buy this book, please use the link above:
http://www.justasummary.com/wheretobuy/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
If you are the Author, Publisher or Partner and want to send us a message, use this link:
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Report an error:
http://www.justasummary.com/reportanerror/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
------- + Share the book of your favorite author + -------
See more at http://www.justasummary.com/
Subscribe on our Channel.
Copyright note: this video only use public information about the book:
Public Synopsis, Cover, ISBN number, Author Name and Publisher Name.
All rights belong to their respective owners.
Contact us for any partnership enquiries, content submission or other requests at
http://www.justasummary.com/contactus/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Contact us for any copyright issues at
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Music from:
http://freemusicarchive.org/
https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrary/music
By 01.Yumac*
ID: BD9780275980986-1226348
--= THE SYNOPSIS OF YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =---
Where to buy this book?
ISBN: 9780275980986
Book Synopsis of Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making of International Strategy by David G. Coleman
If you want to add where to buy this book, please use the link above:
http://www.justasummary.com/wheretobuy/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
If you are the Author, Publisher or Partner and want to send us a message, use this link:
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Report an error:
http://www.justasummary.com/reportanerror/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
------- + Share the book of your favorite author + -------
See more at http://www.justasummary.com/
Subscribe on our Channel.
Copyright note: this video only use public information about the book:
Public Synopsis, Cover, ISBN number, Author Name and Publisher Name.
All rights belong to their respective owners.
Contact us for any partnership enquiries, content submission or other requests at
http://www.justasummary.com/contactus/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Contact us for any copyright issues at
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Music from:
http://freemusicarchive.org/
https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrary/music
By 01.Yumac*
ID: BD9780275980986-1226348
Speakers
Dr. Bruno Tertrais
Senior Research Fellow at the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FRS), the leading French think tank on international security issues. His past positions include Special Assistant to the Director of Strategic Affairs, French Ministry of Defense; Visiting Fellow, RAND Corporation; and Director, Civilian Affairs Committee, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. He has published widely on International Relations and Geopolitics, Conflicts, US Strategy, Transatlantic Relations, Security in the Middle East, Security in Asia, Nuclear Proliferation, Nuclear Deterrence, and Military Strategy.
Dr. Nikolai Sokov
Senior Fellow at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. From 1987-1992 he worked at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union and later Russia, and participated in START I and START II negotiations as well as many summit and ministerial meetings. From 2011-2014 he worked at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Nonproliferation. Dr. Sokov received the Soviet equivalent of a Ph.D. in 1986, and a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1996. He has published extensively on international relations, international security, nuclear arms control and nuclear policies.
Speakers
Dr. Bruno Tertrais
Senior Research Fellow at the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FRS), the leading French think tank on international security issues. His past positions include Special Assistant to the Director of Strategic Affairs, French Ministry of Defense; Visiting Fellow, RAND Corporation; and Director, Civilian Affairs Committee, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. He has published widely on International Relations and Geopolitics, Conflicts, US Strategy, Transatlantic Relations, Security in the Middle East, Security in Asia, Nuclear Proliferation, Nuclear Deterrence, and Military Strategy.
Dr. Nikolai Sokov
Senior Fellow at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. From 1987-1992 he worked at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union and later Russia, and participated in START I and START II negotiations as well as many summit and ministerial meetings. From 2011-2014 he worked at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Nonproliferation. Dr. Sokov received the Soviet equivalent of a Ph.D. in 1986, and a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1996. He has published extensively on international relations, international security, nuclear arms control and nuclear policies.
International constraint and mutual nuclear deterrence may have prevented all-out war with Pakistan in the past over contested Kashmir. With thousands fleeing their homes amid escalating violence, that may not remain a secure wager.
Rising tension at the Line of Control (LoC) between India and Pakistan is putting in question the widely-held assumption that their conflict will not escalate to an all-out conventional or even nuclear war. International concern has extended to the US, previously resistant to mediating in the Kashmir dispute.
Past military crises between India and Pakistan remained at the brink of all-out war because of international pressure and, most importantly, the deterrent value of nuclear weapons. Rationally, since India is conventionally stronger than Pakistan, the latter would not think of escalating the crisis; and since India is a democracy, it would act out the associated values, engaging Pakistan in peaceful dialogue.
But the growing tensions are crowding out rational argument. A primordialist view of the conflict, tracing back to 1947, is exacerbated by media posturing on both sides. This blame game mobilises public opinion in alignment with the nationalist notions of the two states.
The proliferation of nuclear weapons has on the face of it given more strength to Pakistan to flex its muscles, including engaging in sub-conventional warfare with India. And for all its democratic self-image India lacks any open and goal-oriented strategy—seeing in its absence security lapses, intelligence failures, an inability to prevent terror attacks and a disconnect between civilian and military leadership.
Indian security agencies are unable to join the dots at the right time to prevent infiltrations and attacks--repeatedly in the Samba region of Jammu at the LoC and in four synchronised episodes in Kashmir during the recent assembly elections—despite joint mechanisms. While India and Pakistan can join hands in preventing such attacks, a cause of serious concern for both, the escape route for the former in the event of failure is to blame everything on the latter, increasing the trust deficit between the two. In default of a strategy, India tries to curb resistance in Kashmir by sending in more soldiers and paramilitary troops, in counter-insurgency operations for which they are not trained—as even the forces involved acknowledge—and in which they thus cannot be expected to behave in a professional manner. A post-colonial mindset, of dealing with ‘enemies’ by hook or by crook, is applied. This has inevitably heightened alienation in the Kashmir Valley, spiralling via further human-rights violations.
And the posture of India seems more aggressive now, under the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the wider National Democratic Alliance coalition it leads—they having consistently criticised the former centre-left, United Progressive Alliance government as ‘soft’ on Pakistan. Though the prime minister, Narendra Modi, initially showed a willingness to engage, India immediately called off talks between foreign ministers when the Pakistan high commissioner met the hardline Kashmiri separatist Syed Ali Shah Geelani ahead of them. After an hiatus caused by the worst floods to hit Kashmir in years, ever since there has been escalation from both sides.
The occupation continues, regardless of governmental change, because all the political parties in New Delhi share the sentiment that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. The elections in the state however showed a clear polarisation along ethno-religious fault-lines: the regional parties (the National Conference and People’s Democratic Party) predominated in the autonomist Kashmir Valley but the BJP made almost a clean sweep of the more integrationist Jammu, while Congress did likewise in the relatively depopulated Ladakh. With the parties unable to form a new administration, governor’s rule was imposed on 9 January. The BJP has succeeded in dividing the Muslims who predominate in the Kashmir Valley while uniting the Hindus in Hindu-majority Jammu. This has made the partition of the state into the three areas almost palpable. Such a scenario could only lead to further radicalisation of the valley youth, with every possibility of India and Kashmir being thrown back to the violent 1990s. Amid US withdrawal from Afghanistan and Pakistan’s domestic deterioration, any complacency as to reason prevailing would be misplaced.Bear in mind that the BJP manifesto pledged the abrogation of article 370 of the Indian constitution, which ascribes special status to Jammu and Kashmir—the only saving grace by which India can assert the legitimacy of its continuing rule.
International constraint and mutual nuclear deterrence may have prevented all-out war with Pakistan in the past over contested Kashmir. With thousands fleeing their homes amid escalating violence, that may not remain a secure wager.
Rising tension at the Line of Control (LoC) between India and Pakistan is putting in question the widely-held assumption that their conflict will not escalate to an all-out conventional or even nuclear war. International concern has extended to the US, previously resistant to mediating in the Kashmir dispute.
Past military crises between India and Pakistan remained at the brink of all-out war because of international pressure and, most importantly, the deterrent value of nuclear weapons. Rationally, since India is conventionally stronger than Pakistan, the latter would not think of escalating the crisis; and since India is a democracy, it would act out the associated values, engaging Pakistan in peaceful dialogue.
But the growing tensions are crowding out rational argument. A primordialist view of the conflict, tracing back to 1947, is exacerbated by media posturing on both sides. This blame game mobilises public opinion in alignment with the nationalist notions of the two states.
The proliferation of nuclear weapons has on the face of it given more strength to Pakistan to flex its muscles, including engaging in sub-conventional warfare with India. And for all its democratic self-image India lacks any open and goal-oriented strategy—seeing in its absence security lapses, intelligence failures, an inability to prevent terror attacks and a disconnect between civilian and military leadership.
Indian security agencies are unable to join the dots at the right time to prevent infiltrations and attacks--repeatedly in the Samba region of Jammu at the LoC and in four synchronised episodes in Kashmir during the recent assembly elections—despite joint mechanisms. While India and Pakistan can join hands in preventing such attacks, a cause of serious concern for both, the escape route for the former in the event of failure is to blame everything on the latter, increasing the trust deficit between the two. In default of a strategy, India tries to curb resistance in Kashmir by sending in more soldiers and paramilitary troops, in counter-insurgency operations for which they are not trained—as even the forces involved acknowledge—and in which they thus cannot be expected to behave in a professional manner. A post-colonial mindset, of dealing with ‘enemies’ by hook or by crook, is applied. This has inevitably heightened alienation in the Kashmir Valley, spiralling via further human-rights violations.
And the posture of India seems more aggressive now, under the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the wider National Democratic Alliance coalition it leads—they having consistently criticised the former centre-left, United Progressive Alliance government as ‘soft’ on Pakistan. Though the prime minister, Narendra Modi, initially showed a willingness to engage, India immediately called off talks between foreign ministers when the Pakistan high commissioner met the hardline Kashmiri separatist Syed Ali Shah Geelani ahead of them. After an hiatus caused by the worst floods to hit Kashmir in years, ever since there has been escalation from both sides.
The occupation continues, regardless of governmental change, because all the political parties in New Delhi share the sentiment that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. The elections in the state however showed a clear polarisation along ethno-religious fault-lines: the regional parties (the National Conference and People’s Democratic Party) predominated in the autonomist Kashmir Valley but the BJP made almost a clean sweep of the more integrationist Jammu, while Congress did likewise in the relatively depopulated Ladakh. With the parties unable to form a new administration, governor’s rule was imposed on 9 January. The BJP has succeeded in dividing the Muslims who predominate in the Kashmir Valley while uniting the Hindus in Hindu-majority Jammu. This has made the partition of the state into the three areas almost palpable. Such a scenario could only lead to further radicalisation of the valley youth, with every possibility of India and Kashmir being thrown back to the violent 1990s. Amid US withdrawal from Afghanistan and Pakistan’s domestic deterioration, any complacency as to reason prevailing would be misplaced.Bear in mind that the BJP manifesto pledged the abrogation of article 370 of the Indian constitution, which ascribes special status to Jammu and Kashmir—the only saving grace by which India can assert the legitimacy of its continuing rule.
published:03 Mar 2015
views:10
Oral defense: Why New Nuclear Deterrence Practice is Needed?
How nuclear strategy defined the Cold War, based on the logic that one nuclear armed state would not attack another, out of fear of incurring unacceptable da...
Did nuclear deterrence "keep us safe" for sixty years during the Cold War? Does it, in other words, work? For those who already have nuclear weapons, does nu...
Commander Robert Green (Royal Navy, Ret.) delivers the 2011 Frank K. Kelly Lecture on Humanity's Future. Commander Green is the author of a recent book entit...
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
...
published:05 Apr 2014
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
The Trident Missile System - Modern High Tech Weapons - Full Documentary
A giant underwater missile launcher becomes the main arm of America's nuclear deterrence.
The Trident missile is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). The Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) is armed with nuclear warheads and is launched from nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Trident missiles are carried by fourteen active US Navy Ohio-class submarines, with US warheads, and four Royal Navy Vanguard-class submarines, with British warheads. The original prime contractor and developer of the missile was Lockheed Martin Space Systems.
Trident I (designated C4) was deployed in 1979 and retired in 2005. Its objective was to achieve performance similar to Poseidon (C3) but at extended range which improved survivability of the submarine. Trident II (designated D5) had the objective of improved accuracy, and was first deployed in 1990, and was planned to be in service for the thirty-year life of the submarines, until 2027.
Trident missiles are provided to the United Kingdom under the terms of the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement which was modified in 1982 for Trident. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher wrote to President Carter on 10 July 1980, to request that he approve supply of Trident I missiles. However, in 1982 Thatcher wrote to President Reagan to request the United Kingdom be allowed to procure the Trident II system, the procurement of which had been accelerated by the US Navy. This was agreed in March 1982. Under the agreement, the United Kingdom paid an additional 5% of their total procurement cost of 2.5 billion dollars to the US government as a research and development contribution.
The launch from the submarine occurs below the ocean surface. The missiles are ejected from their tubes by igniting an explosive charge in a separate container which is separated by seventeen titanium alloy pinnacles activated by a double alloy steam system. The energy from the blast is directed to a water tank, which is flash-vaporized to steam. The subsequent pressure spike is strong enough to eject the missile out of the tube and give it enough momentum to reach and clear the surface of the water. The missile is pressurized with nitrogen to prevent the intrusion of water into any internal spaces, which could damage the missile or add weight, destabilizing the missile. Should the missile fail to breach the surface of the water, there are several safety mechanisms that can either deactivate the missile before launch or guide the missile through an additional phase of launch. Inertial motion sensors are activated upon launch, and when the sensors detect downward acceleration after being blown out of the water, the first stage engine ignites. The aerospike, a telescoping outward extension that halves aerodynamic drag, is then deployed, and the boost phase begins. When the third stage motor fires, within two minutes of launch, the missile is traveling faster than 20,000 ft/s (6,000 m/s), or 13,600 mph (21,600 km/h).
The missile attains a temporary low altitude orbit only a few minutes after launch. The Guidance System for the missile was developed by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory and is maintained by a joint Draper/General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems facility. It is an Inertial Guidance System with an additional Star-Sighting system, which is used to correct small position and velocity errors that result from launch condition uncertainties due to the sub navigation system errors and some errors that have accrued by the guidance system during the flight due to imperfect instrument calibration. GPS has been used on some test flights but is assumed not to be available for a real mission. The fire control system was designed and continues to be maintained by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems.
Once the Star-sighting has been completed, the "bus" section of the missile maneuvers to achieve the various velocity vectors that will send the deployed multiple independent reentry vehicles to their individual targets. The downrange and crossrange dispersion of the targets remains classified.
The Trident was built in two variants: the I (C4) UGM-96A and II (D5) UGM-133A, however there is no direct relation between these two missiles. While the C4, formerly known as EXPO (Extended Range Poseidon), is just an improved version of the Poseidon C-3 missile, the Trident II D-5 has a completely new design (although with some technologies adopted from the C-4). The C4 and D5 designations put the missiles within the "family" that started in 1960 with Polaris (A1, A2 and A3) and continued with the 1971 Poseidon (C3). Both Trident versions are three-stage, solid-propellant, inertially guided missiles, and both guidance systems use a star sighting to improve overall weapons system accuracy.
published:05 Apr 2014
views:61418
11:01
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
...
published:06 Mar 2015
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
Nuclear Deterrence: Post-Cold War Nuclear Debate
published:06 Mar 2015
views:0
24:24
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
29.04.2013 Douglas Murray debates the General Secretary of the somehow still active CND, w...
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
Douglas Murray and Kate Hudson on Nuclear Deterrence
29.04.2013 Douglas Murray debates the General Secretary of the somehow still active CND, which still argues that if democracies drop their nuclear weapons th...
Track 14 off the 2007 album World Extermination (Label: 625 Thrashcore) Join our facebook page at: The Grind Show http://www.facebook.com/TheGrindShow1 Insec...
Ile Longue in France is the operational base of the four French missile-launching nuclear submarines. NATO is currently reviewing its nuclear deterrence poli...
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
India has a very robust nuclear-deterrence capability: DRDO chief VK Saraswat to NDTV
In a big step towards securing India's capabilities for nuclear deterrence, the reactor on board India's indigenously made nuclear-powered submarine INS Arih...
Independent scholar Ward Wilson took the 2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge Essay Contest grand prize of $10000 with his impressive and...
'The Day After' Nuclear War/Deterrence Discussion Panel - ABC News 'Viewpoint' (November 20 1983)
My blog: http://marcriley.wordpress.com
My twitter: @MarcDRiley
CREDIT: This video file h...
published:26 Nov 2013
'The Day After' Nuclear War/Deterrence Discussion Panel - ABC News 'Viewpoint' (November 20 1983)
'The Day After' Nuclear War/Deterrence Discussion Panel - ABC News 'Viewpoint' (November 20 1983)
My blog: http://marcriley.wordpress.com
My twitter: @MarcDRiley
CREDIT: This video file has been created from files found and acquired from the Museum of Classic Chicago Television (http://fuzzymemories.tv/), an organization dedicated to the preservation of Chicago television broadcasts from years gone by. My thanks go out to them. Posted with permission.
INFO: This video is a discussion panel from the ABC News panel discussion program 'Viewpoint', moderated by Ted Koppel, from November 20 1983. This episode focuses, narrowly speaking, on the then-recently aired nuclear war television movie 'The Day After' (information on it can be found on Wikipedia). However, I don't feel one needs to see the TV Movie to follow/understand this discussion. More broadly speaking, though, the discussion focuses on topics such as nuclear war, nuclear deterrence, and the then-present tensions between the East and West in the midst of what was a very tense and dangerous part of the Cold War. I found this to be an insightful and intriguing look into an era gone by that, I feel, can never really be truly and totally understood (in terms of what living in it was like) by those who were born after it had passed - myself included.
The panel, moderated by Ted Koppel, consists of (in no particular order):
- Carl Sagan (notable and distinguished scientist and an authority on the topic of Nuclear Winter)
- William F. Buckley Jr. (noted conservative political commentator, publisher of the National Review)
- Robert S. McNamara (United States Secretary of Defense to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson)
- Henry Kissinger (National Security Adviser and later Secretary of State for President Richard Nixon)
- Brent Scowcroft (National Security Adviser for President Gerald Ford, and later National Security Adviser for President George H.W. Bush)
- Elie Wiesel (Nobel Peace Prize recipient and Holocaust survivor)
and a brief interview with George Shultz (then-Secretary of State to President Ronald Reagan at the time of the broadcast)
Again, this panel is extremely intriguing into the subject of nuclear war, the effects of it, the danger of it, nuclear deterrence and how it connects to the former subjects, tensions between the East and West, and various other things - all within the context of a time where all of these things were very present, very real realities that everyone living in that time had to live with and accept. I hope it's as intriguing to you all as it was to me.
published:26 Nov 2013
views:15149
53:14
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, will spe...
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions: Perspectives on Nuclear Deterrence
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, will speak on the maintenance of US strategic nuclear deterrence and the enduring role of the US nuclear triad....
Thomas Schelling, Professor of National Security at University of Maryland
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of th...
published:06 May 2013
Thomas Schelling, Professor of National Security at University of Maryland
Thomas Schelling, Professor of National Security at University of Maryland
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear deterrence and game theory during the Cold War. Schelling, aged 92, is a U.S. economist and professor of foreign affairs, national security, nuclear strategy and arms control at the University of Maryland, United States. From 1948 to 1953, Schelling served with the Marshall Plan in Europe, then the White House, and the Executive Office of the President. Later Schelling joined the Department of Economics at Yale University before being appointed Professor of Economics at Harvard and then at Maryland. In 1993, Schelling received the Award for Behavior Research Relevant to the Prevention of Nuclear War from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Schelling also received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2005 for his research on game theory.
---
Schelling was interviewed by CTBTO Spokesperson Annika Thunborg in Vienna in November 2012. An advocate of nuclear deterrence, Schelling explains how nuclear weapons policies developed in the first decades of the Cold War. He shares his impressions of the impact of nuclear bombings at the end of World War II and how memories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki played a role during the Korean War. He also stresses the importance of game theory when promoting cooperation in disarmament.
published:06 May 2013
views:3193
72:35
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
The ECSSR organized a lecture – Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Chall...
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities
The ECSSR organized a lecture – Roots of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence Instability: Challenges and Opportunities – delivered by Haider Mullick, Adjunct Professor, Naval War College, United...
The Wisdom of Foolishness: Taking on Nuclear Deterrence
The Wisdom of Foolishness: Taking on Nuclear Deterrence
Martin E. Hellman is Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. His effort to "Defuse the Nuclear Threat," (see NuclearRisk.org) in...
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
Adelphi Book Launch - On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan
The IISS launched the new Adelphi Book 'On Nuclear Deterrence - The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan' on Tuesday 25 October 2011. Michael Quinlan's care...
The Sons Play Fallout Tale of Two Wastelands! Nuclear Deterrence! - Part 56 - Sons Of Vidya
Who knows more about geopolitics than us?
►Email us! Sonsofvidya@gmail.com
►Twitch: twit...
published:23 Mar 2015
The Sons Play Fallout Tale of Two Wastelands! Nuclear Deterrence! - Part 56 - Sons Of Vidya
The Sons Play Fallout Tale of Two Wastelands! Nuclear Deterrence! - Part 56 - Sons Of Vidya
Who knows more about geopolitics than us?
►Email us! Sonsofvidya@gmail.com
►Twitch: twitch.tv/sonsofvidya
►The Podcast: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
►Our Twitter: https://twitter.com/SonsofVidya
published:23 Mar 2015
views:41
76:08
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
As part of the Nuclear Crossroads Initiative, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's...
published:13 Feb 2015
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
Seminar: Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways & Best U.S. Responses?
As part of the Nuclear Crossroads Initiative, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk entitled "Regional Nuclear Powers: Deterrence Strategies, Escalation Pathways and Best U.S. Responses" by Jasen J. Castillo, associate professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service, on Nov. 20, 2014.
Iran's possible drive to acquire nuclear weapons has raised alarm bells in several international capitals. The prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran highlights a growing strategic problem for the United States. If Iran establishes itself as a nuclear power, as North Korea did a few years ago, then the United States will confront yet one more country capable of countering its formidable conventional military capabilities. Not only will the U.S. need to consider the conventional balance when planning for regional intervention, but it will also need to evaluate the balance of nuclear forces. Any U.S effort to defend its friends and allies, therefore, must begin by asking how and under what conditions these potential adversaries might use their nuclear weapons in a confrontation. To better understand these problems, this paper addresses the following questions: What strategies could regional nuclear powers adopt to deter nuclear attacks? Similarly, what strategies could they pursue to deter conventional attacks before or during a conflict? What is the likelihood of nuclear escalation during a conventional conflict with regional powers? Finally, how should the U.S. respond to the first-use of nuclear weapons during a conventional conflict?
Jasen J. Castillo is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M; University's George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service. He came to the Bush School after serving on the staff of the Policy Planning Office in the U.S. Department of Defense.
published:13 Feb 2015
views:15
78:22
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
...
published:31 Oct 2013
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
[Asan Plenum 2011] Session5 - Nuclear Deterrence and Conventional Deterrence
published:31 Oct 2013
views:2
20:57
"The Reform of Nuclear Deterrence" — Dr. Tom Nichols
...
published:19 Nov 2014
"The Reform of Nuclear Deterrence" — Dr. Tom Nichols
"The Reform of Nuclear Deterrence" — Dr. Tom Nichols
Urdu/Nat
Amid escalating tensions with India, Pakistan is approaching the first anniversa...
published:28 Jul 2015
PAKISTAN: NUCLEAR TESTS ANNIVERSARY
PAKISTAN: NUCLEAR TESTS ANNIVERSARY
Urdu/Nat
Amid escalating tensions with India, Pakistan is approaching the first anniversary of its nuclear tests.
And one year after declaring itself a nuclear power, the question facing Pakistan seems to be not whether to deploy nuclear weapons, but rather, officials say, how many would constitute a "minimum nuclear deterrence".
Pakistan detonated its devices on May 28 and May 30 last year in response to India's tests, which were conducted two weeks earlier.
The tit-for-tat tests generated global concerns of a runaway nuclear arms race on the volatile South Asian subcontinent, the arena of three wars in 52 years.
Pakistani Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif declaring his country a nuclear power on state television.
On May 28th 1998 Pakistan carried out five underground nuclear tests in Baluchistan, in response to test by India carried out two weeks previously.
A few days later a sixth test took place in Pakistan - a show of strength against arch rival India.
At the time Sharif said he had no choice but to carry out the detonations because India was posing a threat to his nation's security.
SOUNDBITE: (Urdu)
"Today God has given us the power in order to save our kingdom from danger. It was the final solution which we had to do. In 1974 when India first carried out an atom bomb explosion - we did not have all the know how then. This nuclear test saved us from a new danger."
SUPER CAPTION: Nawaz Sharif, Pakistani Prime Minister
Pakistan claims India has been a threat to its security since independence in 1947.
The state of Kashmir, the flashpoint of two previous wars between India and Pakistan, remains the trouble spot between the two nuclear nations.
The international community has been called on to help find a solution to the issue.
Both Pakistan and India lay claim to a united Kashmir, which was split between the two countries after the British left the region.
And tensions between the two neighbours have escalated this week following airstrikes over Kashmir by India, which is vowing to push out Pakistan-backed guerrillas who it says seized Indian posts.
One year on from its nuclear tests, Islamabad says they have done more good than bad.
SOUNDBITE: (English)
"The nuclear tests were very positive for Pakistan and a plus for peace in South Asia. Pakistan now feels more secure with India there is a stable balance of power between India and Pakistan the threat of war has receded and the two countries can now talk to each other on the basis equality and parity. The nuclear tests have also helped to internationalise the Kashmir question, that is also very important because Kashmir is part of the U-N agenda and the people of Pakistan now feel more confident, more assured and they have more faith in the future."
SUPER CAPTION: Mushahid Hussain, Information Minister
Support from the Pakistani people was overwhelming at the time of the underground nuclear tests.
People were seen celebrating out on the streets.
But they, along with India, suffered worldwide condemnation, and the U-S imposed economic sanctions.
These were later lifted.
Financial experts say the country's economy is on the mend.
SOUNDBITE: (English)
"I thin the IMF package Pakistan managed to get towards the end of last year and the beginning of this year together with the resumption of Financial assistance and the external debt rescheduling by the Paris and London clubs , I think that is a silver lining to be a positive development. If Pakistan can sustain the reform effort I think on balance it has strengthened the economy."
SUPER CAPTION: Saqib Sherani, Economic expert
Relations between India and Pakistan were expected to deteriorate even further as time went on.
But it didn't take long for the weapons games to start up again.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9d2b624433d324a954d8dd4548593508
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:28 Jul 2015
views:1
6:19
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3.
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Ar...
published:16 Jul 2015
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3.
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
published:16 Jul 2015
views:1
3:24
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3...
published:16 Jul 2015
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Reel America: "Not for Conquest" U.S. Army Nuclear Deterrence in 1965
Watch Reel America, July 26 at 4pm ET on C-SPAN3
published:16 Jul 2015
views:247
200:39
Extended Deterrence in Europe/NATO
Featuring Dr. Jim Tegnelia, former Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Dr....
published:11 Jul 2015
Extended Deterrence in Europe/NATO
Extended Deterrence in Europe/NATO
Featuring Dr. Jim Tegnelia, former Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Dr. Rich Wagner, Nonresident Senior Advisor at CSIS NATO's culminating.
Panel İ: The Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Regional Challenges Chair: Brig. Gen. (ret.) Shlomo Brom (INSS) Speaker: Dr. Bruno Tertrais (FRS) Complex Nonco.
In an interview with Thomas Schelling, the CTBTO Faces interview series presents one of the most influential thinkers of nuclear weapons strategy, nuclear de.
On November 12, the Transatlantic Security Initiative in the Atlantic Council's Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security hosted a conference on NATO'.
published:11 Jul 2015
views:2
0:09
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/qcpwjwc
Despite not having been used in ange...
published:19 Jun 2015
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/qcpwjwc
Despite not having been used in anger since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the atomic bomb is still the biggest threat that faces us in the 21st century. As Bill Clinton's first secretary of defense, Les Aspin, aptly put it, "The Cold War is over, the Soviet Union is no more. But the post-Cold War world is decidedly not post-nuclear." For all the effort to reduce nuclear stockpiles to zero, it seems that the bomb is here to stay. This Very Short Introduction reveals why. The history and politics of the bomb are explained: from the technology of nuclear weapons, to the revolutionary implications of the H-bomb, and the politics of nuclear deterrence. The issues are set against a backdrop of the changing international landscape, from the early days of development through the Cold War.In this new edition, Joseph M. Siracusa includes a new concluding chapter, moving away from the emphasis of nuclear weapons in the "age of terrorism", to the significant lessons to be learnt from the history of the nuclear weapons era. Siracusa shows that because 21st century nuclear proliferation has deep roots in the past, an understanding of the lessons of this nuclear history is paramount for future global policies to be successful.ABOUT THE SERIES:The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area. These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable.
published:19 Jun 2015
views:0
49:07
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, en...
published:30 May 2015
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
ʬ The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But this reliance on conventional means is likely to produce the opposite outcome of what its advocates intend. Rather than stability, such a world is likely to be characterized by destabilizing arms races and an increased likelihood of great power war – particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. After all, in Europe and especially Asia, the history of conventional deterrence and formal arms control agreements since 1500 is rife with failure. Drawing upon such challenges, Dr. Leah will advance the argument that nuclear weapons, in sufficient numbers and deployed in a wide spectrum of delivery systems, remain a necessary component of international security.
Leah is a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Grand Strategy Program at Yale University. Previously, she was a Stanton Postdoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Security at MIT, a visiting fellow at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, a summer research fellow at RAND, and a research intern at IISS-Asia, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, IISS-London, the French Ministry of Defense, and the UMP office of Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy. She is the author of Australia and the Bomb, and has published in Comparative Strategy, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Asian Security, the Australian Journal of International Affairs, The National Interest, and with RSIS and RAND.
ʬ Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age YouTube
published:30 May 2015
views:0
56:29
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, enti...
published:27 May 2015
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age
The Center for Global Security Research (CGSR) sponsored this talk by Christine Leah, entitled “Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age” on April 2, 2015, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Abstract:
Proponents of nuclear reductions and nuclear disarmament insist that the world should move towards a second conventional age: where nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. How might the U.S. deter adversaries, and assure allies, in such a world? The answer would ultimately rest on conventional force balances and conventional arms control, especially of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But this reliance on conventional means is likely to produce the opposite outcome of what its advocates intend. Rather than stability, such a world is likely to be characterized by destabilizing arms races and an increased likelihood of great power war – particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. After all, in Europe and especially Asia, the history of conventional deterrence and formal arms control agreements since 1500 is rife with failure. Drawing upon such challenges, Dr. Leah will advance the argument that nuclear weapons, in sufficient numbers and deployed in a wide spectrum of delivery systems, remain a necessary component of international security.
Leah is a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Grand Strategy Program at Yale University. Previously, she was a Stanton Postdoctoral Fellow in Nuclear Security at MIT, a visiting fellow at the Rajaratnam School of International Studies, a summer research fellow at RAND, and a research intern at IISS-Asia, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, IISS-London, the French Ministry of Defense, and the UMP office of Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy. She is the author of Australia and the Bomb, and has published in Comparative Strategy, the Journal of Strategic Studies, Asian Security, the Australian Journal of International Affairs, The National Interest, and with RSIS and RAND.
published:27 May 2015
views:13
71:01
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence...
published:22 May 2015
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
GCIG Conference, May 14-15, 2015: Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
Nuclear VS. Cyber: Conflict and Deterrence
published:22 May 2015
views:24
28:36
In The Fight: Episode 98
In this episode of In The Fight, the U.S. Air Force combines live training and virtual tra...
published:02 May 2015
In The Fight: Episode 98
In The Fight: Episode 98
In this episode of In The Fight, the U.S. Air Force combines live training and virtual training in one major exercise, service members ride home from Operation Atlantic Resolve in the longest convoy since World War II, Global Strike Command trains for nuclear deterrence, the California National Guard gears up for wildfire season, and civil affairs Soldiers in Djibouti help local kids get a kick out of soccer.
GO TO THE FRONTLINES: More videos at http://www.militaryvideos.com
A decision not to renew the UK's nuclear deterrent would be "irresponsible folly", a group of ex-senior military officials has said.
In a letter to The Times, 20 former defence chiefs said to "abandon" Britain's four Trident submarines would be "an enormous gamble" which could threaten "the survival of our nation".
Among the signatories are two retired defence secretaries and GCHQ directors.
A decision on whether to renew Trident is due to be taken in 2016.
On Tuesday, Labour's shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker said his party was committed to renewing all four Trident submarines if it wins the election.
The Conservatives have also committed to renewing all four missile submarines, while the Liberal Democrats favour cutting to three.
The SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens want Trident to be scrapped.
UKIP has said it would not scrap Trident, but would consider cutting back to three submarines.
'Irrevocable decision'
Among those who have signed the letter are Labour's Lord Robertson, a former defence secretary and Nato chief, and retired chief of the general staff General Sir Mike Jackson.
Three previous heads of the armed forces, three ex-Royal Navy chiefs, and two former GCHQ directors are also among the signatories.
The open letter addressed to "the incoming Prime Minister 2015" said a decision not to renew the fleet would "effectively end Britain's nuclear deterrent", and would be "irrevocable".
"To abandon Trident now and for good in the hope that no threat will emerge would be to take an enormous gamble on behalf of generations not yet born," they said.
"In an uncertain world where some powers are now displaying a worrying faith in nuclear weapons as an instrument of policy and influence, it would be irresponsible folly to abandon Britain's own independent deterrent."
The decision would affect "the security and ultimately the survival of our nation", they said.
The UK had made reductions in its nuclear arsenal proportionately greater than any other nuclear weapons power, which represented "a huge contribution towards nuclear disarmament", the letter said.
"We should stand ready to do more, but only if it can be proved that it does not compromise minimum levels of nuclear deterrence," it added.
Concern about the humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons has provided one of the sharpest intellectual challenges to nuclear deterrence in recent decades. Although the United Kingdom and the United States sent representatives to the most recent international conference on the subject, the nuclear-weapon states have generally been reluctant to respond. Do nuclear weapon states fail to appreciate the consequences of nuclear use? Moreover, what implications do these consequences have for policy? Specifically, are there circumstances under which the use of nuclear weapons could still be consistent with both international law and morality in spite of the consequences?
published:24 Mar 2015
views:11
1:51
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
--= THE SYNOPSIS OF YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =---
Where to buy this book?
ISBN: 978027598...
published:10 Mar 2015
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
Synopsis | Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making Of International Strategy
--= THE SYNOPSIS OF YOUR FAVORITE BOOK =---
Where to buy this book?
ISBN: 9780275980986
Book Synopsis of Real-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making of International Strategy by David G. Coleman
If you want to add where to buy this book, please use the link above:
http://www.justasummary.com/wheretobuy/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
If you are the Author, Publisher or Partner and want to send us a message, use this link:
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Report an error:
http://www.justasummary.com/reportanerror/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
------- + Share the book of your favorite author + -------
See more at http://www.justasummary.com/
Subscribe on our Channel.
Copyright note: this video only use public information about the book:
Public Synopsis, Cover, ISBN number, Author Name and Publisher Name.
All rights belong to their respective owners.
Contact us for any partnership enquiries, content submission or other requests at
http://www.justasummary.com/contactus/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Contact us for any copyright issues at
http://www.justasummary.com/messageaboutthisbook/?param=eyJ1aWRBY2hlQm9vayI6IjIwMTQxMDA5MjIxNzM1MTIzNDc4In01
Music from:
http://freemusicarchive.org/
https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrary/music
By 01.Yumac*
ID: BD9780275980986-1226348
published:10 Mar 2015
views:0
55:40
Nuclear Weapons and European Security - Part 2
Speakers
Dr. Bruno Tertrais
Senior Research Fellow at the Fondation pour la Recherche Str...
published:06 Mar 2015
Nuclear Weapons and European Security - Part 2
Nuclear Weapons and European Security - Part 2
Speakers
Dr. Bruno Tertrais
Senior Research Fellow at the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FRS), the leading French think tank on international security issues. His past positions include Special Assistant to the Director of Strategic Affairs, French Ministry of Defense; Visiting Fellow, RAND Corporation; and Director, Civilian Affairs Committee, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. He has published widely on International Relations and Geopolitics, Conflicts, US Strategy, Transatlantic Relations, Security in the Middle East, Security in Asia, Nuclear Proliferation, Nuclear Deterrence, and Military Strategy.
Dr. Nikolai Sokov
Senior Fellow at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. From 1987-1992 he worked at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union and later Russia, and participated in START I and START II negotiations as well as many summit and ministerial meetings. From 2011-2014 he worked at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Nonproliferation. Dr. Sokov received the Soviet equivalent of a Ph.D. in 1986, and a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1996. He has published extensively on international relations, international security, nuclear arms control and nuclear policies.
CBS 2News reports that with the public outcry over Cecil’s cold blooded death at the hands of the American dentist, Palmer’s practice is shutting down. Palmer paid an estimated $50,000 for the “privilege” to hunt down and kill Cecil the lion, according to the ZimbabweConservationTask Force. The animal was lured out of the park he was in, shot with a crossbow, then shot with a rifle a few days later ... ....
Kylie Jenner has ignited rumours she is now married to 25-year-old rapper Tyga after posting a picture of herself wearing a new ring on her wedding finger ... The second seems to be a diamond encrusted band ... ....
Competitive intel docs leak to forums, reveal NetApp beaten by SolidFire for Cisco sale. NetApp has inadvertently leaked competitive intelligence documents to a community newsfeed, and the contents reveal it worries that IBM and Cisco's VersaStack will threaten its FlexPod business and that SolidFire has emerged as a threat. ....
Investigators leading the search for Malaysia AirlinesFlight 370, missing for more than a year, are trying to determine whether debris that washed up on Reunion island off Madagascar belongs to the missing aircraft. French officials have forwarded photographs of what looks like part of an aircraft wing, Joe Hattley, a spokesman for the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, said by telephone Thursday ...It’s been 16 months.” ... Part Number ... ....
Experts are analyizing a piece of a wing discovered in the Indian Ocean Wednesday to determine if it belongs to Flight MH370 Malaysia Airlines that went missing in March 2014... [View the story "Apparent airplane debris found on island in Indian Ocean" on Storify] ... More NewsHeadlines ... ....
To assess the potential contribution of the Iranian nuclear agreement to U.S ...Despite its limitations, the Iranian nuclear deal seems to achieve the primary objectives of the United States and thus warrants support ...First and foremost, the nuclear agreement effectively ends or "blocks the path" to an Iranian nuclear weapon in the short-term ... In short, Tehran is agreeing to put a nuclear weapon out of its reach in the short-term....
Michigan entered service as one of the Navy’s 18 Ohio-classnuclear trident missile submarines, known colloquially as “boomers.” ... As those numbers drop, the Navy will also ask Congress to fund an Ohio-class replacement in order to preserve what the Pentagon considers the most survivable leg of its nucleardeterrent....
Michigan entered service as one of the Navy’s 18 Ohio-classnuclear trident missile submarines, known colloquially as “boomers.” ... As those numbers drop, the Navy will also ask Congress to fund an Ohio-class replacement in order to preserve what the Pentagon considers the most survivable leg of its nucleardeterrent....
Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan on Thursday dubbed the execution of 1993Mumbai blasts accused Yakub Memon to be a sad day for Indian democracy and said that capital punishment is not serving as an effective deterrent against terrorism ... Asserting that the debate over capital punishment would never end, Tulsi said it serves as a deterrent against mindless crimes....
... steps to deal with black money and will focus on high-impact cases with a view to prosecuting offenders expeditiously for credible deterrence against tax evasion....
The court’s supposed deterrent back in 2007 proved a dud ...Canada just doesn’t treat hit-and-run as a serious crime ... Foster says the current system doesn’t provide enough deterrent, though he struggles to understand how anyone, impaired or otherwise, could leave someone to die ... on Feb ... And so it will go, until Canada’s legal system takes hit-and-run seriously, making long stints in jail a certainty and deterrent....
While it might have been likely that North Korea would have sought nuclear weapons anyway, America's involvement likely made it inevitable. As Henry Kissinger once said, even paranoids have enemies, and only nukes offer a certain deterrent to the North, which today alone faces the U.S ... The fact that the Kim dynasty is evil does not mean that it has no legitimate security fears which might be assuaged by possession of a nuclear arsenal....
Stoking a controversy, Congress leader Digvijay Singh today said the credibility of government and judiciary was at stake after the "urgency" shown in Yakub Memon's case while his party MP Shashi Tharoor questioned the efficacy of death sentence in serving as a deterrent... In his tweets, Tharoor raised questions over the efficacy of death penalty in acting as a deterrent. "There is no evidence that death penalty serves as a deterrent ... ....
Jakarta (ANTARA News) - The Iranian government has expressed its readiness to cooperate with Indonesia in the field of nuclear technology, following the UN Security Council Resolution on Irans nuclear program. "The Islamic Republic of Iran is ready to share its experience in the field of advanced nuclear technology based on international regulations," Iranian Ambassador to Indonesia Valiollah Mohammadi said here on Tuesday....
(Source. HRW - Human Rights Watch). Today, on his 54th birthday, Yakub Memon took the last, loneliest walk of his life - to the hangman's noose ... But the often professed goals for capital punishment - deterrence, reformation, or justice - hardly hold up to scrutiny. There is no conclusive evidence from India to show that the death penalty acts as a deterrent ... The Supreme Court, in a binding judgment in Bachan Singh v ... distributed by ... (noodl....
On 14 July the P5+1 powers (US, Russia, China, Britain, France, Germany) and Iran agreed on a JointComprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) concerning the dismantling of the Iranian nuclear program. Iran reaffirmed that it under no circumstances will ever seek, develop or acquire nuclear weapons ... As a result Iran's breakout time for producing a nuclear weapon will increase from the current two months to one year....