7 Jul 2015

Anti-Muslim Group Presents Petition To Halal Inquiry With 13 Signatures

By Max Chalmers

The Q Society, one of the loudest opponents of Islam and multiculturalism in Australia, deny they sent the document to the inquiry. Max Chalmers reports.

Update: Since this story was published New Matilda has been contacted by Deborah Robinson, who said she had not been aware of the submission and that the Q Society was yet to make its formal submission to the Inquiry.

“I have no idea how it ended up on the parliamentary website because we certainly didn’t send it in,” she said.

She did not dispute that the petition itself was put together by the Q Society, and when asked further questions, including whether another member of the Society could have sent it in, she hung up.

The submission, which had been vetted by the parliamentary committee before publication, is no longer available on the parliamentary website. An Administrative Officer working for the committee said they could not currently reveal the name of the person who submitted the document, which may yet be returned to the website. We wait with bated breath.

One of the country’s most prominent anti-Islamic groups has presented a 13 signature strong petition to the Australian Parliament calling for any costs of halal certification to be borne by ‘Islamic community organisations’.

The Q Society – which has long campaigned against Islamic practices including halal certification, and protests against “nihilistic multiculturalism” on its website – presented the petition as a submission to the ongoing Senate Inquiry into food certification.

“This petition draws the attention of the House to a business model developed by Islamic organisation [sic] to impose ‘Halal Certification Schemes’ on all Australians,” the petition says.

“Halal slaughter can be seen by non-Muslims as [an] objectionable religious rite and idol worship. We do not wish to be subjected to unwanted religious practices.”

According the latest data from the Bureau of Statistics, 23,823,490 Australians had not signed the petition at the time of writing.

The primary petitioner Deborah Robinson, who has previously appeared in the media as the Q Society’s Deputy President, is the only signatory listed, with the other names redacted for privacy reasons.

Despite its underwhelming submission, the Q Society has been at the fore of anti-Islamic campaigns in recent years, helping bring Dutch politician Geert Wilders to Australia, and teaming up with people like Kirralie Smith to campaign against Islamic cultural practices.

The Senate’s Inquiry into food certification, initiated by South Australian Senator Cory Bernardi, has so far published almost 370 submissions.

While the inquiry is supposed to look at a range of food certification processing, including kosher, organic, and genetically modified, the overwhelming majority of submissions have taken aim at halal.

Judging by the content of those published so far, food industry groups and halal organisations who welcomed the inquiry as a chance to have a reasonable conversation and dispel myths about the process are set to be disappointed.

The overwhelming majority of submissions have been made by individuals angry about halal.

While their determination to inhibit halal certification and ‘creeping sharia’ are undeniable, their actual understanding of what those words mean, as well as their grasp of English language conventions and basic word processing practices, have been less convincing.

The RSPCA has not raised objections to halal abattoirs in Australian, except where exemptions to standard practices of halal and kosher slaughter have been allowed, while groups like Cadbury Australia have said the cost of their halal certification does not flow through to consumers.

In a major investigation into organised crime, terrorism, and money laundering, the Australian Crime Commission found no links between the “legitimate halal certification industry” and criminal activity.

Log in or register to post comments

Discuss this article

To control your subscriptions to discussions you participate in go to your Account Settings preferences and click the Subscriptions tab.

Enter your comments here

IAIN HALL
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 12:35

Why do you think that the number of signitures on this submission matters?

What is important is the argeument that is being put within the submission.

In any event would you make the same argeument about other issues?

I think not.

This user is a New Matilda supporter. PAW
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 12:42

Only 13 signatures out of approximately 24 million, that is what i call an overwhelming majority,  not. Your signature on it iain , probably yes.

Andrew McIntosh
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 12:43

Just had a look at their website. I can get a Geer Wilders Australian tour t-shirt, with the catchy slogan "A Tolerant Society Is Not A Suicidal Society" for the low price of fifty bucks. Not to mention the Halal shopping bag that tells passers by "This bag is FREE! Halal certification is not. Halal certification funds mosques, madrassas, jihad" (that'll only set me back five). Hal & Al's "72 Virgins" sparkling white wine is a rather pricey seventy two bucks but I'm not clear if that's by the bottle or the dozen. 

This user is a New Matilda supporter. hannahs dad
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 13:10

Its always a problem isn't it?

Do you ignore the nutters, all dozen plus maybe a few, and deprive them of  the media oxygen

they don't deserve or do you take note of their ignorance , stupidity and nastiness and ridicule them as they deserve?

This user is a New Matilda supporter. Pegi
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 13:26

We should add Kosher, Vegan, celiac, vegetarian, paleo, and so on... to name just a few. These are also anti australians and do not fit the anglo saxons model of eating....Mash and bang...just to joke.

Australia is a rich country in terms of food and the variety of food that have been introduced since the 1970's.  I remember when I first cam we had only slice cheese ...strong or mild cheddar in the supermarkets. Thanks God (whoever it might be) today to the array of food is a bonanza.

I wonder if THEY would also condemn Kosher food as it might finance some groups in the Middle East and their ongoing wars....since 1948. ANd bring it to parliament for consideration.

This whole circus /argument is a sham, ridicule, farcical and so ignorant. This just fuels racism and hatred. 

The argument is also futile Ian...don't you think that ASIO would already be onto it if that were the case?

 

This user is a New Matilda supporter. jules s
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 14:11

Not to mention the Halal shopping bag that tells passers by "This bag is FREE! Halal certification is not. Halal certification funds mosques, madrassas, jihad" (that'll only set me back five).

So the bag isn't free?

 

What a pack of lying scumbags.

This user is a New Matilda supporter. roscoe_oz
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 14:12

well iain it is indicitive of the seeming importance, or not, of the submission

This user is a New Matilda supporter. PAW
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 14:27

 

Why were the other names redacted, you would think being part of the Q Society they would want to be on it, or are they afraid to be associated with them and afraid of recriminations. 

ww216
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 14:32

"In a major investigation into organised crime, terrorism, and money laundering, the Australian Crime Commission found no links between the “legitimate halal certification industry” and criminal activity."

Where does it say Halal Certification was investigated? Quite a misleading claim (one of many) by Maxy again.

Can the author link to any investigation into Halal Certification?

Rashid.M
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 14:45

One of the country’s most prominent anti-Islamic groups has presented a 13 signature strong petition to the Australian Parliament calling for any costs of halal certification to be borne by ‘Islamic community organisations’

Why? Halal certification authorities are business enterprises. As such they charge a fee for service. Companies who wish to utilise their service make the conscious choice to pay for the service. If Islamic community organisations employ a certification authority, then they should pay them the fee. If they don't then they shouldn't. That's how fee for service works.

It's absurd to suggest a company will choose to employ any type of certification authority without regard for the cost/benefit to their business of doing so. it's equally absurd to assume they will necessarily pass on the cost of certification to consumers, rather than factoring in its absorption through an expected increase in revenue. if there was not an expectation of increased market access and increased revenue, why would companies bother to seek certification in the first place?

AlexLee
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 14:58

http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

jexpat
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 15:41

Meh, no one's going to top Florence Corneloup's sternly worded submission, in purple comic sans font.

https://newmatilda.com/2015/05/18/halal-senate-inquiry-submission-i-want-clear-labelling-so-i-can-choose-not-support-death

falcemartello
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 15:50

Dont you just luv the post modernist version of the WHITE AUSTRALIA POLICY. What a bunch of morally and intellectually bankrupt lot these fools /so called human beings. I find anything they say so repugnant its making me take anti emetics on a daily basis ever since ABBOTTOIRE and his liberal national coallition. Mind you some would call them fascist but not in OZ. yesterdays news gets wrapped in todays fish. 

A2K
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 15:53

Iain Hall.

I agree. The number of petitioners is irrelevant next to the idea enclosed in the submission.

Unfortunately, the ideas put forward by the Q Society and there ilk can only be supported by a wilfil decision to ignore verifiable facts.

The RSPCA doesn't consider halal slaughter to be inordinately cruel.

The price of certification isn't passed on to the consumer. Barnaby Joyce even observed that it served to lower the price for domestic consumption by allowing companies to move their product more widely abroad.

No observed connection between the certification fees/organisations and criminal behaviour. Terroristic or otherwise.

No one is forcing companies to certify their product as halal, so why shouldn't they pay for the process given it increases their chance for export profits?

Halyucinations
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 16:55

 Halal certification was originally introduced so companies could export products into Muslim countries.  It was instigated by large corporations seeking to make money from food product! Not by Muslims but by large food producing companies wanting to make a Profit.  Anyone beginning to see what side of the "Coin" this is occurring on???

 

Even Liberal Party stalwart, Malcolm Turnbull MP, in reply to a boycotter,  

has reiterated government support for halal certification. 

He said

1. "halal certification or preparation in no way changes the quality or safety of the food." 

2. "halal certification and associated fees are not taxes." 

3. "The decision by a food company to meet halal requirements is a voluntary decision" 

4. "Halal certification is not required to be declared on the label"

 

All the certification means is that Halal food has been blessed, killed and prepared according to a few specific specifications.  (Here is a link to the specifications:  http://madinameats.com/how-to-prepare-halal-food.html). Your food that you buy at the supermarket is killed and prepared according to a few specific specifications called health regulations.  The Muslim regulations are not that dissimilar except for the religious blessings although one could produce an argument for finding food certification a form of secular blessing. And we all know how that certification has been going since lax labelling laws allow frozen berries to be brought in labelled "Made in Australia with local and imported ingredients".  Given Abbott's enthusiasm for FTAs, they will weaken Australia's ability to maintain its own safety standards.  Berries this year, rotten meat last year and the horse meat scandals from the year before. It strikes me that rigid  food specifications are a good thing.

 

 The Jewish community have food prepared according to a few specific specifications, it is called kosher meals.  They have been doing it for generations here in Australia.

 

So exactly how does Hallal or Kosher (which no one is carrying on about) food harm anyone? What the inquiry is – in theory – supposed to be about - Certification for foods!  What part of that don't people understand?

talknic
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 17:33

@ ww216  quoted this "In a major investigation into organised crime, terrorism, and money laundering, the Australian Crime Commission found no links between the “legitimate halal certification industry” and criminal activity."

"Where does it say Halal Certification was investigated?"

In the bit you quoted... 

"Can the author link to any investigation into Halal Certification?"

You just did

JonMW
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 20:49

PAW.

One could assume that the other 12 signatories are all sitting members from the far-right faction of the LNP.

"They're so far right, they must be wrong!" - Anon

This user is a New Matilda supporter. Bilal
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 22:23

The whole investigation only included kosher and organic as a cover for the racist agenda behind it. Bernardi is well known for his attitudes and they are seen as reflecting the deep ideology of the Liberal Party, of which he has long been a valued member. There is a rump of haters in this country who use a whole range of what they see as arguments for attacking halal slaughter, and they seem to be, to a person, supporters of the Bernardi mentality. They are fortunately only a tiny minority and that is why I can send this article around the Muslim world without it causing hatred for Australia. It is well understood that these morons represent a past era and religious obscurantism which would find like minds in ISIS rather than mainstream Australia..

ww216
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 23:20

talknic 

No I didn't, you should actually read the link.
There has been no direct investigation into Halal Certification. 

This user is a New Matilda supporter. PAW
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 23:54

ww216, maybe you should have posted the whole sentence and read it again, it actually states an investigation into Halal certification. If there was no investigation, why would they state there was no direct links between halal certification and terrorism.

This from the link. "The task force has identified direct links between serious and organised crime, money laundering and terrorism funding. However, the Australian Crime Commission is not aware of any direct links between the legitimate halal certification industry and money laundering or the financing of terrorist groups"

Argus
Posted Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - 23:51

I have long ceased to be outraged by Iain Hall's contrarian, pot-stirring, righty contributions to these forums. His efforts remind me of the guys who regularly defend a certain low cost airline on another site in response to the tales of woe postings by aggrieved customers.  One has to question what their motivations are.   

 

MazelMan
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 00:00

The Q Society can be praised for warning us a few years back about the impending Islamisation of our society before we got to where we are today. All those weak-minded journalists and media commentators kept on blindly pushing their insane, politically correct, moral equivalence, multiculturalism is sacred, deny-the-facts-on-the-ground party line. 

Ahead of their time.

ww216
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 01:23

Paw it states quite clearly  "The Australian Crime Commission-led Eligo National Task Force is focused on the use of the alternative money remittance sector and other informal value transfer systems (IVTS) by serious and organised crime. 

The task force has identified direct links between serious and organised crime, money laundering and terrorism funding. However, the Australian Crime Commission is not aware of any direct links between the legitimate halal certification industry and money laundering or the financing of terrorist groups."

It makes absolutely no reference to any major investigation into the 30+ certifiers in Australia. They make no claim beyond stating that 'they are not aware', Any claim of a "major investigation" is clutching at straws at best. It could just as well have said 'we found no link between halal certification and terrorism during our investigation of art fraud'.

The quote specifically relates to task force Eligo, who's primary role is to investigate money laundering by organised crime through ARS', which is a fairly narrow scope of investigation and certainly would not include a certifier distributing funds through a charity. Of course they're not going to find anything if they don't actually look.

The ACNC however, which is responsible for investigating and managing charities has tried to investigate charities including halal certifiers operating as charities, with regards to connections to overseas distribution of funds. They requested help from the Senate as the job is far too large for them to handle, that is ongoing. Watching money distribution within Australia is certainly achievable, however monitoring it once it reaches a country such as Syria is near impossible.

Why did the ACC specifically mention Halal? I guess you could equally argue why didn't they mention any other aspect of their investigation in that release? - the most likely answer is that someone of influence has asked them to write it.

Here's a warning by ACNC of links between Australian charities and funding of terrorism and yes, many halal certifiers do operate as Australian charities.
http://www.acnc.gov.au/ACNC/Comms/Med_R/MR_118.aspx

I'm certainly not making a claim that Australian certification funds terrorism, but at the same time I would not be surprised if it did eventuate. We've already seen links between AFIC (certifiers) and Man Monis, we've already seen links between charities and terrorism, we've already seen evidence of links between Islamic businesses and terrorism, it seems quite a small step to get to halal certification and terrorism. 

talknic
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 01:22

@ MazelMan

Uh?   What Islamisation of Australian society?

talknic
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 01:42

@ ww216

LOL  All that to say nothing of any substance.  WOW!  How clever.

Your link BTW says nothing what so ever about Halal certifiers.

ww216
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 02:17

lol you mean the "links between Australian charities and funding of terrorism" link?

Wow great deduction by you. Who would have guessed the link was about what I said it would be about - clearly you got me.

As for substance, we'll have to disagree. I think there is far more substance there than anything little Maxy Chalmers was guessing about, it is certainly more accurate. 
But your history here I'm sure if I said up you would say down, I think content is something you're not very interested in.

Feel free to prove there was a "major investigation".

ww216
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 02:23

SIKH KHALSA MISSION INCORPORATED (ABN: 14 366 769 006)

The Hon’ble Chairperson, Federal Senate Committee, Parliament House, Canberra,
A.C.T. 2601

— HAMLIN STREET QUAK US HILL, NSW 2763 'h. No. 02 — 9837 2787

Date: 12 June 2015

Senate Committee: Halal Food Certification in Australia

Sikh Khalsa Mission Incorporated (NSW) wishes to submit the following few lines for your kind consideration:

Section 116 of The Australian Constitution says:

“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.”

According to the understanding of a layperson, it would mean that Australian Government would neither’ interfere nor boost any religion. Then it is not clear as to why “Halal Certification” at the instance of The Australia Federation of Islamic Councils was imposed in 1974? Google search says:

“Halal Certification. in Australia began in 1974. The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils was recommended as the sole authority for the standards and oversight for food products purchased by religious Muslims in Australia.”

But in reality, several foods sold through Super Markets and other retail shops are certified as “Halal”, which often is purchased by those persons, who do not adhere to Islamic way of life. While buying, it is not possible for the customer to go on reading the small prints on each and every food product. Moreover, it is tantamount to impose such products on others without their knowledge.

For the last 40-50 years, adherents of other religions inigi ating from various countries have acquired the Australian Citizenship and most of them do not practice Islamic religion. Kindly have a look at.the Australian Census 2011 population figures under major religions:

1. Christians 13,150,672
2. Buddhism 528,976
3. Islam 476 291
4. Hinduism 275 533
5. Judaism 97 335
6. Sikhism 72 297
7. Plus others 
Total: 21,507,719

Third party certification of food Submission 284

it is not very clear as to why views of one Muslim community were imposed on others since 1974? It is quite likely that in the near future some adherents of other religions may also come up with any other similar requirement. For instance, the current Indian Government has banned the slaughter of cows for eating ’purpose in one State because the Hindus consider “cow” as their mother. Similarly, Jews may come forward with the proposal to buy meat from the “Ko’sher” shops fulfilling requirements of Jewish law. Will the Australian Government also agree to their demand to ban sale of beef in Australia?

Sir, we are not against any other religion or community but our humble request before the Senate Committee is that “Halal Certification” in Australia should be dispensed with. If Islamic community needs any such certification, let them have it provided such products are sold from their own shops. Therefore, we are of the view that such food products should not be sold in the Super Markets, School Canteens, Hospitals, Railway catering, University Shops and Restaurants, etc.

"f’hanks for your favourable consideration.

On Behalf of Sikh Khalsa Mission lncorporated,

GURMIT SINGH, J.P. (NSW),
Sikh Scripture Volunteer & Public Officer Email Address:

DON_de-Plume
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 06:44

lol you mean the "links between Australian charities and funding of terrorism" link?

Wow great deduction by you. Who would have guessed the link was about what I said it would be about - clearly you got me.

As for substance, we'll have to disagree. I think there is far more substance there than anything little Maxy Chalmers was guessing about, it is certainly more accurate. 
But your history here I'm sure if I said up you would say down, I think content is something you're not very interested in.

Feel free to prove there was a "major investigation".

 

Feel free to disclose the extent ( from empirical evidence, to go along with your suppositions) of the investigation that you purport wasn't major - or any, apparently.

You have the air of the contrarian yourself, yo go along with the propagandist.

DON_de-Plume
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 06:51

But in reality, several foods sold through Super Markets and other retail shops are certified as “Halal”, which often is purchased by those persons, who do not adhere to Islamic way of life. While buying, it is not possible for the customer to go on reading the small prints on each and every food product. Moreover, it is tantamount to impose such products on others without their knowledge. 

 

"Not possible".

 

WHY?

Inyss
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 08:15

If you are going to cover a story it's best to cover the whole issue - Consumer Choice.

Consumers only have one way of recognising what they want to purchase and what they don't and that is by reading the label.

Labelling laws DO need to be reviewed and there needs to be a system to make sure the labelling is kosher, if you get my drift.

I don't buy many processed products. I hate GMO's so I don't buy anything that 'may' contain GMO's. I don't buy anything with the Heart Tick because I have issues with the Heart Foundation. I am an Atheist so I don't buy religiously certified products, kosher, halal or seventh day adventist.

I buy Australian owned, grown and made over imported products and I WILL be putting in a submission to the Senate enquiry. 

 

Jack T
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 08:47

If Maxwell Chalmers waits with 'baited' breath, maybe he should stop eating bait - it makes your breath smell, and not nice to be near. Possibly he means waiting with bated breath. Where do these half-educated wannabe journalists come from?

DON_de-Plume
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 09:03

Jack T, you've mastered that bated error!

Jack T
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 13:33

Thanks, DON_de-Plume Do you mean baited error?  I see he has removed the smelly 'i'. Glad to be of assistance to the left.

talknic
Posted Wednesday, July 8, 2015 - 15:11

@ ww216
 
" Who would have guessed the link was about what I said it would be about"

This is what you wrote (it's still there) " Here's a warning by ACNC of links between Australian charities and funding of terrorism ..."
http://www.acnc.gov.au/ACNC/Comms/Med_R/MR_118.aspx

It is in fact  "how to help charities avoid funding terrorism activities";  it outlines the risks they should avoid;  the link does not mention Halal Certifiers. 

"and yes, many halal certifiers do operate as Australian charities."   "many" ?  The ACNC lists only one Halal Certifier operating as a charity
 
"Feel free to prove there was a "major investigation".

The NM article didn't claim there as a major investigation into Halal certification. There certainly has been a major investigation into organized crime and terrorism related financing.  No connections were found to Halal Certification

http://www.austrac.gov.au/publications/corporate-publications-and-reports/terrorism-financing-australia-2014  No mention of Halal certifiers

Your accusations are not substance or evidence.

talknic
Posted Thursday, July 9, 2015 - 00:54

@ Jack T
"I see he has removed the smelly 'i'. Glad to be of assistance to the left"

You might check on poor Mr HALL while you're at it.... He'll be amazed I'm sure to find himself on the so called 'left'

Rashid.M
Posted Thursday, July 9, 2015 - 03:03

@Inyss

I am an Atheist so I don't buy religiously certified products, kosher, halal or seventh day adventist.

I'm sorry I don't follow. How is being an atheist impacted by consuming products certified for particular religious groups? 

The only halal food which is 'blessed' is red meat and poultry, i.e. the blessing occurs as an integral part of the slaughter process. Halal certification in all other instances simply involves an independent verification that an existing production process does not use unwanted ingredients/additives. How is such an independent verification at odds with atheistic belief?

If the issue for you as an atheist is 'blessed' foods, then what's to stop anyone walking the aisles of your local supermarket and 'blessing away' to their hearts content? No labelling law would cover that.

I myself eat Weetbix and haven't found it to have made me less of a Muslim.

Inyss
Posted Thursday, July 9, 2015 - 14:13

@Rashid.M

I'm an Atheist so I don't believe blessing something changes it in any way. So you can bless everything on the shelves and it wouldn't affect me.

Some Atheists are just non-believers but I am also anti-religion so I choose not to buy products with any sort of religious connecttion.

It is my choice and I believe it should be on the labels so I can make an informed choice. Other people may have other reasons for wanting religiously certification clearly labelled and that is their right as consumers.

Rashid.M
Posted Thursday, July 9, 2015 - 18:51

@Inyss

To a degree I'm playing devil's advocate here. I have no quarrel with clearer labelling, only the targeting of halal by those whose anti Muslim agenda extends far beyond food certification.

And I do respect your right as an individual to choose whatever you do or don't want to consume for whatever reason. 

I suppose I see avoiding products with any sort of religious connection as somewhat impractical. Unless you don't buy fuel, don't use anything with oil based plastic polymers, don't consume any product or any service, any part of whose revenue may eventually go to religious based charities etc. And then there's company employees with a religious orientation whose wages are contributed to through consumer purchases....where should the line of principle be drawn?

Inyss
Posted Friday, July 10, 2015 - 09:06

@Rashid.M

I agree with you Rashid that it's not only impractical but damn near impossible to not 'consume any product or any service, any part of whose revenue may eventually go to religious based charities etc.' but I try my hardest. I try to walk the walk and not just talk the talk.

I'd also like to say I don't hate people, but I do hate religion. Why? Because people kill in the name of religion as witnessed since it all began. I don't have the same problem with people who are spirituallistic in a non-religious, non-violent way even though I still think it's a load of bs.

Following our 22 year old son's death 8 years ago I had a few too many religious people and spiritual people telling me things to try to justify their beliefs. I really didn't need that at the time.

I am a part of the 1 million women movement in Australia. We aim is to live low carbon lives and currently I am systematically removing plastics from my home. My short term future plans include off-grid electricty and an electric vehicle.

Anyway I think this conversation is done.

Cheers

Inyss

http://www.1millionwomen.com.au/

 

talknic
Posted Friday, July 10, 2015 - 16:03

Lucky Halal is labelled so those who don't want to eat it can drop whatever it is and run screaming and frothy mouthed from the store in a mad wild eyed panic

This user is a New Matilda supporter. Australian Muslim
Posted Saturday, July 11, 2015 - 10:43

How you heard of this?

`A WA Liberal MP has claimed Australians are unknowingly being converted to Islam by eating Halal meat.`

https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/12032577/halal-meat-converting-aussies-mp/