19 May 2015

One Year On: A New Matilda Editor's Perspective

By Chris Graham

Chris Graham looks back at one year in the hot seat... which has rickety wheels, a broken gas-lift and ripped fabric.

When I took over New Matilda a year ago today, I promised readers a wild ride. I don’t know about you, but I’ve certainly had one.

In the space of a year, we’ve found ourselves in the Federal Court and the NSW Supreme Court – with numerous other threats in between - and we’ve been investigated by state and federal police on several occasions.

We’ve been attacked by media, including being accused of plotting to bring down the Prime Minister on the front page of The Australian (which is of course partly true… at New Matilda, we’re permanently involved in plots to ‘bring down’ Prime Ministers and other politicians, although we call it ‘reporting’).

I have a simple theory on journalism: if they’re not suing you, if the coppers aren’t watching you, if other media aren’t attacking you, then you’re not doing your job (note to other reporters: if none of that is happening to you, what you’re probably doing is ‘public relations’).

So the wild ride promise, I consider kept. Other promises – including a recent one – have been broken, but I’ll come back to those in a minute. Because it’s gloating time.

The past year has seen us break some big stories – Frances Abbott’s secret scholarship, Barry Spurr’s world beating racism, Scott Morrison’s ‘shit-worried’ persona, and the secret treaties we signed with Indonesia to help prop up the death penalty.

We’ve revealed ghost environmentalist on a big mining companies’ green committee, we’ve caught out all sorts of people practicing all sorts of racism, we’ve mocked Reclaim Australia, harassed neo-Nazis, and Andrew Bolt.

All that fun notwithstanding, I’d be lying if I said that I’ve loved every minute of my New Matilda journey. Certainly, I’ve had some euphoric moments – the buzz you get on deadline as you get ready to break a major yarn is pretty good – but working in the media is a tough gig. And working in independent is even tougher.

It can also occasionally be ridiculous, as can I. My appearance in the Federal Court - unrepresented, in Spurr vs At Large Media – while, more or less, a fond memory, scandalised the Australian judicial system by my mere presence (think Denis Denutto in The Castle).

But one of the best things about my job is that I never stop learning. BNM (Before New Matilda) I’d spent my entire career in print media. I’d dabbled with online media, but never really jumped in balls and all.

Marni Cordell and the teams before her built an extraordinary platform for alternative views. The thing I like most about New Matilda (before I took over, and still today) is its absolute stubbornness and refusal to lay down and die, particularly in a media landscape that has claimed a few casualties.

Over the past year, I’ve tried to preserve New Matilda’s values, and add a bit of aggression. I’ll leave it to readers to judge whether or not we’ve achieved that.

But on the singing my own praises front, one of my proudest achievements at NM is the team (a fair bit of which, admittedly, I inherited).

When I took over New Matilda, we had no full-time staff. Today, New Matilda employs Angela Nicholson, Amy McQuire, Max Chalmers, Thom Mitchell and yours truly (although admittedly, I don’t draw a wage – I do ‘other’ stuff such as media and political advice to pay the bills, which explains my occasionally sporadic appearances online).

We also pay more of our writers, cartoonists and contributors, although we still rely on a lot of charity. Our goal this year is to build our paid subscriptions to 10,000 that will fund an awful lot of independent media.

As we stumble our way there, I’m mindful that in addition to Ange, Amy, Max and Thom in particular, I owe a very deep debt of gratitude to the stalwarts (some paid, some not) who keep New Matilda ticking – Geoff Holland (our lawyer, and the most sensible man in the room), Wendy Bacon (contributing editor and moral compass), Ben Eltham and Ian McAuley (good with numbers, logic and everything we throw at them), Michael Brull (Mr Unassailable), Liz Conor (brilliant, funny, and brilliant again) and Jeff Waugh (Man-genius who speaks a language none of us understand).

And there’s Fiona Katauskas, Lindsay Folye and Costa A, who make me laugh at least three times a week.

I also owe a huge thanks to our sources – Freya Newman, and the others, who know who they are. These are the people who risk a lot (including, occasionally, their liberty) to blow the whistle. You have my endearing thanks, and my email address – just don’t use it if you’re sending me ‘stuff’.

I also owe a big thanks to Charbel, Georgia and the incredible team of staff and students at the Velvet Onion Academy. Ange and I recently completed a User Experience design course (gratis) at Velvet Onion, and we’re still working with the crew to re-design the site (who knew the whole ‘internet thingie’ could be so damn complicated).

Most of all, I owe a big debt of thanks to our readers. Our traffic is up in the ‘hundreds of percent’ since last year, indeed last month represented the biggest in the site’s history, traffic-wise.

And so now to a few of the broken promises.

In my very first piece as editor I promised readers a revamp of the NM website: “The front end of the website is due for an overhaul. Watch this space.”

For those still watching, my apologies.

One of the challenges of small, independent media is obviously money – we’ve tinkered at the edges of NM’s front end, but as yet haven’t been able to afford a major overhaul.

And more recently, I delivered another broken promise. In April, I promised you MAYhem, where New Matilda would roll out a major investigation each Monday during the month of May. At the risk of pointing out the bleeding obvious, May has come and gone… and with no New Matilda scalps to speak of.

New Matilda’s website is still struggling – we still experience occasional outages, and our payment system remains archaic (although I hope you’ve noticed, the NM site is a lot quicker these days, the occasional bug notwithstanding).

The upshot is, we’re still undergoing ‘the transformation’ – it’s a looooong, complicated and occasionally infuriating process. Much longer than I had anticipated. But we’re getting there. If you want to help us on the journey, you can subscribe here, or just make a donation here.

One of the things that really helps us is endorsements to family and friends – that’s as simple as sharing our stories on social media.

Professionally speaking, New Matilda has been the toughest ride of my life. Every day is a new struggle. But it’s also been one of the most satisfying. While Aboriginal affairs is obviously my area of deepest interest, I’ve also really enjoyed writing on other national and international issues.

I’ve also enjoyed the reader interaction. In my first editorial a year ago, I wrote that New Matilda had a community feel behind it like I’d never seen before in media. I’m now even more familiar with that community, and even more convinced of its power and passion.

Admittedly, I’ve chased the odd reader from our comments section, and driven conspiracy theorists (and Holocaust deniers) into the metaphorical sea. But I’ve done it from a position of love (as in, I ‘love’ smashing conspiracy theories and Holocaust deniers... a man has to have a hobby).

And on that front, it’s cost us an awful lot of money – our legal bill so far this year stands at a shade under $55,000 – if you want to contribute, you can do so here. More on those battles later.

And one final pitch - if you believe in independent media and an alternative voice, then please consider subscribing to New Matilda today, if you haven’t already. We need subscriptions to survive. And if one day, as recently promised, we reach 20,000, we’ll no longer take corporate advertising, and give our ad space away free to community groups and not-for-profits.

Finally, keep watching this space… I promise MAYhem is coming, and I promise the website is getting an overhaul.

And as always, I promise the wild ride will continue.

Log in or register to post comments

Discuss this article

To control your subscriptions to discussions you participate in go to your Account Settings preferences and click the Subscriptions tab.

Enter your comments here

This user is a New Matilda supporter. PAW
Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2015 - 14:46

 

Thank you  Chris for keeping us updated, looking forward to the future and keep up the good work.

This user is a New Matilda supporter. michaelbrull
Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2015 - 18:03

"as a Paul Eisen influenced Shoah revisionist"

ED'S NOTE: The previous comment by Kevin Charles Herbert - which sought to debate the Holocaust and promote Holocaust denial - has been removed and his account has been deleted without notice. Readers are reminded to familiarise themselves with New Matilda's forum rules before commenting, available here. 

IAIN HALL
Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2015 - 18:22

Well done Chris I don't agree with much of your politics but I am more than  happy to give you a hat tip for running a lively forum

DON_de-Plume
Posted Tuesday, May 19, 2015 - 20:09

I enjoyed the email I got, which appears the same as this article, ,,, but I thought that Chris Graham guy came across as a bit smarmy.

i think Micheal Brull should be handling the PR side of things.

EarnestLee
Posted Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 01:12

Now if we could just separate reporting facts from opinion.?

Some day maybe Nivarna?

This user is a New Matilda supporter. Belgo Geordie
Posted Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 09:39

Having an opinion I thought was something of value. You, Mr Graham, have in my view delivered, backed up opinion with facts as they stand and taking your readership into areas outside the mainstream media. As for the commentry, mostly thought provoking, sometimes annoying but at least critical dialogue. New Matilda is a good thing! 

DrGideonPolya
Posted Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 10:29

Well done, Chris.  I’ll have to remember to renew my sub and make a generous donation to NM.

However I would differ in relation to “conspiracy theories” which seem to be commonly regarded as any hypotheses differing from the American Government  narrative that dominates Western and Australian Mainstream media that consistently malreport and lie by omission (see “Mainstream media censorship”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammediacensorship/home  and “Mainstream media lying”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/  ).

Yet American Governments consistently LIE as the following 4 expert judgements maintain:

1. Brilliant American  writer Gore Vidal: “Unlike most Americans who lie all the time, I hate lying. And here I am surrounded with these hills [in Hollywood] full of liars — some very talented… Americans are not interested in the truth about anything. They assume everybody is lying because they go out and lie everyday” (see Gore Vidal interviewed by Melvyn Bragg on the South Bank Show”, 2008: http://warincontext.org/2012/08/01/remembering-gore-vidal-change-is-the-nature-of-life-and-its-hope/ ).

2. Outstanding  American  writer, academic, editor, commentator  and “Father of Reaganomics” Dr Paul Craig Roberts:  “Americans live in a rigged system in which propaganda determines the public’s awareness and consciousness. Americans, or most of them, live in the Matrix.  Since the end of WWII, most foreign governments have been in the habit of going along with Washington. Only in the aftermath of Washington’s phony wars based on lies and phony economy based on rigged statistics is the rest of the world beginning to realize that Washington is a destabilizing force” (see  Paul Craig Roberts, “The attack on gold”, Information Clearing House,  17 April 2013: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34648.htm ).

3.  Dr Paul Craig Roberts: “Washington lies about everything””(see Paul Craig Roberts, “Seymour Hersh Succumbs To Disinformation”, Countercurrents, 11 May, 2015: http://www.countercurrents.org/roberts110515A.htm ).

4. CNN: “President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two nonprofit journalism groups… the Center for Public Integrity and its affiliated group, the Fund for Independence in Journalism.” (see “Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war”, CNN, 24 January 2008: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/ ).

fightmumma
Posted Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 11:14

well done Chris, keep up the great work, in the cat amongst the pigeons scenario - much better being the cat probably!! Cheers FM

O. Puhleez
Posted Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 12:32

Chris:

I have a simple theory on journalism: if they’re not suing you, if the coppers aren’t watching you, if other media aren’t attacking you, then you’re not doing your job (note to other reporters: if none of that is happening to you, what you’re probably doing is ‘public relations’). 

Or as William Randolph Hearst allegedly said:

News is what somebody does not want you to print. All the rest is advertising.

And one sub coming up soon. Cheque for it's in the mail (to me). As soon as I get it, I'll pass it on; bearing in mind that I have to protect my identity and phone boxes are in short supply these days.

This user is a New Matilda supporter. Alicia Flynn
Posted Tuesday, May 26, 2015 - 13:48

Keep up the GREAT work!  

This user is a New Matilda supporter. Venise Alstergren
Posted Tuesday, May 26, 2015 - 16:23

CHRIS GRAHAM: I've just read your article written 26 May '15.

I've tangled with KH before this. The thing which really surprises me is I always assumed I was crossing swords with a man in his seventies????!! Well I did stop short of addressing him as 'cur' pronounced sir.