JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

How erotic is your workplace?

Date

Work in Progress

James Adonis is one of Australia's best-known people-management thinkers

View more entries from Work in Progress

Sexual relations are an uninvited guest in many businesses But they're a guest who won't be easily evicted.

It's naive to expect sexual relationships won't start at work.

It's naive to expect sexual relationships won't start at work. Photo: Angela Wylie

In the premiere episode of Mad Men, it's Peggy's first day on the job and so her new mentor Joan is taking her on the obligatory office tour. "If you follow my lead," counsels Joan, "you can avoid some of the mistakes I've made here … like that one", referring to a colleague walking past. She then sends Peggy to a gynaecologist since it won't be long before she, too, needs contraceptive pills.

Later that day, with her prescription filled, Peggy makes a move on her manager. "I'm your boss, not your boyfriend," he states, promptly rejecting her. Peggy, clearly overcome, tries to save herself: "I hope you don't think I'm that kind of girl." Well, actually, she is that kind of girl because later that night she sleeps with her co-worker, who also happens to be getting married that weekend.

I hope you don't think I'm that kind of girl. 

But what if, similarly, you are that kind of girl? Or that kind of guy? How do you then manage sexual relationships at work? It certainly takes a formidable capacity for bravery since these carnal couplings are often the fountain from which gossip and innuendo are lapped up by insatiable colleagues.  

In a sense, these sexual relationships are unavoidable. Most people spend more time with team mates than they do with friends and relatives. It's to be expected a certain proportion will give in to their inner animal instinct by engaging in workplace dalliances, and not because of the romantic potential but simply because it's, well, fun. If not awkward sometimes. And, depending on how it's managed, occasionally a source of embarrassment.

These consequences are what inspired a global team of researchers, led by the University of Technology in Sydney (where I teach), to identify the ways in which organisations respond to these inevitable sexual encounters. Even though they might not occur at work, the workplace is nonetheless the, um, breeding ground where it all begins.

The findings, published two months ago in the Journal of Management Inquiry, categorise organisations into four different groupings.

The first is referred to in academic lingo as 'institutionally rationalised' – in other words, ignorance and avoidance. Leaders in these organisations promote a non-emotional workplace. But even though they demand employees act formally, they're still aware indiscretion will happen, which is fine so long as they don't know about it. When they find out, however, they usually ignore it or cover it up. 

The second type of organisation takes things seriously. Very seriously. It's known as 'legalistically rationalised', and it's characterised by leaders who love anti-love policies. For example, they'll get employees to sign non-fraternisation agreements or they'll demand people declare their romantic liaisons as a way of avoiding conflicts of interest. In effect, they see greater risk than reward out of such pairings, and so they impose rules they actively police.

The tongue-twisting third category is called 'normatively pluralistic'. These organisations are a little more relaxed. They're OK with love but not sex. And by 'love' they mean celibate love because what they encourage is a brotherly and sisterly type of connection where you feel genuine love (or something very close to it) for your colleagues and managers. Such affection and cohesiveness is believed by many to result in greater work performance.

Finally, we have the fourth category, the most liberal one, dubbed 'normatively eroticised'. These organisations know people are sexual beings and so, naturally, they accept sexual attraction is unstoppable at work. As long as it doesn't cross the line into harassment, they have no issue with the workplace being the location at which relationships of a flirtatious nature flourish. They assume their workers are smart enough to navigate this delicate terrain.

And yet, as the scholars note, sexual relations "are still an uninvited guest" in many organisations. But they're a guest that won't be easily evicted.

In which category does your organisation belong? Have you ever had a sexual relationship with a colleague?

Follow James Adonis on Twitter: @jamesadonis

15 comments so far

  • It's dangerous terrain. I've seen as many sexual harrassment cases eventuate as I have worthwhile relationships.

    It's not something I'd ever go near, unless it was genuinely unstoppable.

    Commenter
    John
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    Thu Jun 18 22:30:38 UTC 2015
    • Dare I suggest: 1. most sexual harrassment cases derived from male initiative.
      2. most relationships derived from female initiative.
      The keys to achieving the latter (and avoiding the former) are 1. be handsome 2. have power 3. be handsome.

      Commenter
      office analyst
      Date and time
      Fri Jun 19 03:09:05 UTC 2015
    • It is generally bad policy to 'get your meat where you get your bread.' When the dalliance fails, it becomes very difficult to avoid her.

      Commenter
      The Genuine Article
      Date and time
      Fri Jun 19 06:45:57 UTC 2015
  • I met my husband at work - we told nobody (and only a couple of close friends knew.) He made it clear to those around him that he didn't like me. I had a picture of my male housemate and I on my desk... I left the organisation shortly afterwards and turned up at the Christmas party with a rock on my finger! Loved the reactions!
    Now we joke about not having an affair with someone you work with - you never know where it'll end up :)
    Discretion is the key folks!

    Commenter
    10yearswife
    Date and time
    Fri Jun 19 00:44:41 UTC 2015
    • You two did the right thing, but most people aren't that discreet or clever. And it depends on how "blood hound-y" your colleagues are. I've found that government is the worst in terms of gossip and nosiness and lack of discretion. I keep my personal and private lives completely separate, but even that is cause for comment and dissection. People just wait for you to slip up and there is much speculation about your private life, especially if you don't speak about it (as I don't). It seems as though in some workplaces, you're damned if you and damned if you don't!

      Commenter
      AudraBlue
      Location
      Brisbane
      Date and time
      Sat Jun 20 05:23:48 UTC 2015
  • In a modern world, work place relations should require the woman to make the move, smiling is not a move, unfortunately the feminist movement rather the practice of relationships stay in the 50s.

    Commenter
    cecil
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    Fri Jun 19 02:53:10 UTC 2015
    • Agreed it's simply too much of a risk for a man to initiate as it can always lead to accusations of harassment thanks to extreme interpretations of harassment constantly being promoted by feminists (men will always be perceived as oppressors and women victims, thanks to the cultural narrative being promoted by feminists). It's delicate enough in a work place, where you have to manage relationships and not lose face, lest you lose your position or status in the organisation, let alone throwing in faux sexual harassment claims.

      And yes, women are still remarkably reticent to make the first move; the reality is women hate making the first move, taking responsibility etc. Its why men ultimately are responsible for the progress of society to the point today.

      Commenter
      blogster
      Date and time
      Sat Jun 20 22:55:19 UTC 2015
  • I met my first wife at work. I had plenty more "relationships" at the same company after that marriage failed. I never had anyone saying that I was harassing them. I even got chatted up by 2 of the women at work. This was a big Government organisation and it was the mid 1980's. Those were fantastic times.

    Commenter
    IA
    Date and time
    Fri Jun 19 04:08:47 UTC 2015
    • I worked in a female dominated work place for 9 years and in that time had "relationships" with 13 woman. Many of these encounters were in the work place. I am not an overly attractive man and did not have a lot of luck with the ladies until I worked there. Because the woman outnumbered the men by 4-1 my stocks rose dramatically. 10 Of these woman were married and 8 still are to my knowledge. It was amazing to see woman being the predators. It ruined my marriage and I ended up getting sacked but gee it was fun while it lasted.

      Commenter
      No Chance
      Date and time
      Fri Jun 19 06:15:49 UTC 2015
      • I've worked for a couple of ASX listed companies where sexual favours were rampant between senior executives and the female staff. In one the CEO was well-known as a serial philanderer who had had sex with many of the female staff. Some of the next two tiers of management thought him a model they should emulate. The married woman who succeeded me when I moved on was notoriously the mistress of a Tier 2 executive to whom she ended up reporting. This is within the last five years; I'm not talking about the Swinging Sixties here. Get ahead by giving head was an often-practised theme

        In the other the company maintained a corporate account at the city's leading brothel, for the use of board members, senior executives and the clients they were entertaining

        Commenter
        Steve
        Date and time
        Fri Jun 19 06:54:40 UTC 2015

        More comments

        Make a comment

        You are logged in as [Logout]

        All information entered below may be published.

        Error: Please enter your screen name.

        Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Please enter your comment.

        Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

        Post to

        You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

        Thank you

        Your comment has been submitted for approval.

        Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

        Ask our Experts

        Want to know how to manage your business?

        Ask our Experts

        Featured advertisers
        Small Biz newsletter signup

        Small Biz newsletter signup Small Biz news delivered to your inbox twice-weekly.

        Sign up now