An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English), is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
Many U.S. jurisdictions title their appellate court a court of appeal or court of appeals. Historically, others have titled their appellate court a court of errors (or court of errors and appeals), on the premise that it was intended to correct errors made by lower courts. Examples of such courts include the New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals (which existed from 1844 to 1947), the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors (which has been renamed the Connecticut Supreme Court), the Kentucky Court of Errors (renamed the Kentucky Supreme Court), and the Mississippi High Court of Errors and Appeals (since renamed the Supreme Court of Mississippi). In some jurisdictions, courts able to hear appeals are known as an appellate division.
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
62:09
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, a...
0:00
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
0:00
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.
15:00
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
4:57
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
41:09
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014....
2:10
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
The Solicitor General argued before the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeals has no authority to issue an injunction on the Ombudsman.
Joyce Balancio tells us why.
AIRING DATE: April 14, 2015
For more videos: http://www.untvweb.com/video/
2:05
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
5:35
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare is facing a legal challenge in the form of Halbig v. Burwell where a federal appeals court in Washington, DC decided that the government cannot iss...
63:35
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
On March 4, 2013 the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that retroactively requiring a person to register as a sex offender in accordance with laws created in 2...
119:11
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
7:32
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
3:21
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory who says that the strugg...
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
62:09
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, a...
0:00
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
0:00
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.
15:00
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
4:57
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
41:09
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014....
2:10
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
The Solicitor General argued before the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeals has no authority to issue an injunction on the Ombudsman.
Joyce Balancio tells us why.
AIRING DATE: April 14, 2015
For more videos: http://www.untvweb.com/video/
2:05
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
5:35
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare is facing a legal challenge in the form of Halbig v. Burwell where a federal appeals court in Washington, DC decided that the government cannot iss...
63:35
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
On March 4, 2013 the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that retroactively requiring a person to register as a sex offender in accordance with laws created in 2...
119:11
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
7:32
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
3:21
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory who says that the strugg...
51:57
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs includ...
1:06
Judge Bill Southern for NC Court of Appeals
Judge Bill Southern for NC Court of Appeals
Judge Bill Southern for NC Court of Appeals
Judge Bill Southern is a candidate for the North Carolina Court of Appeals (Hunter Seat) in the 2014 Election. Judge Southern currently serves as a District Court Judge for Stokes and Surry Counties. Prior to his election in 2008, he served as an Assistant District Attorney and taught briefly in our state's public schools system.
Find out more about Judge Southern on his website at www.SouthernforJudge.com
1:53
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules: Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules: Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules: Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
The First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled the filming of police officers, during arrests or otherwise, is a constitutional right protected by the Fir...
10:07
SONA: Pagpapasuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
SONA: Pagpapasuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
SONA: Pagpapasuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
State of the Nation is a nightly newscast anchored by award-winning broadcast journalist, Jessica Soho. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 9:00 PM (PHL Time) on GMA News TV Channel 11. For more videos from State of the Nation, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/stateofthenation.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
4:51
Saksi: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
Saksi: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
Saksi: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
Saksi is GMA Network's late-night newscast hosted by Arnold Clavio and Pia Arcangel. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 11:30 PM (PHL Time) on GMA-7. For more videos from Saksi, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/saksi.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
39:25
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Court of Appeals hearing on the Pork Lawsuit.
71:22
Oral Arguments Against Same Sex Marriage New York Court of Appeals 2006
Oral Arguments Against Same Sex Marriage New York Court of Appeals 2006
Oral Arguments Against Same Sex Marriage New York Court of Appeals 2006
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov New York State Court of Appeals 6/17/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 192974-1 From C-SPAN's Description: On May 31, 2006, New York's hig...
2:57
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould
Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould, of Seattle, does not let multiple sclerosis dampen his passion for justice. He focuses on strength...
145:28
Domestice Surveillance Program Judicial Proceeding 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Domestice Surveillance Program Judicial Proceeding 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Domestice Surveillance Program Judicial Proceeding 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Courtesy C-SPAN, Public.Resource.Org The Honorable Harry Pregerson The Honorable Michael Daly Hawkins The Honorable Margaret McKeown Judicial Proceeding Dome...
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, a...
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, a...
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
published:22 Jan 2015
views:121
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014....
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014....
The Solicitor General argued before the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeals has no authority to issue an injunction on the Ombudsman.
Joyce Balancio tells us why.
AIRING DATE: April 14, 2015
For more videos: http://www.untvweb.com/video/
The Solicitor General argued before the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeals has no authority to issue an injunction on the Ombudsman.
Joyce Balancio tells us why.
AIRING DATE: April 14, 2015
For more videos: http://www.untvweb.com/video/
published:15 Apr 2015
views:9
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
Obamacare is facing a legal challenge in the form of Halbig v. Burwell where a federal appeals court in Washington, DC decided that the government cannot iss...
Obamacare is facing a legal challenge in the form of Halbig v. Burwell where a federal appeals court in Washington, DC decided that the government cannot iss...
On March 4, 2013 the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that retroactively requiring a person to register as a sex offender in accordance with laws created in 2...
On March 4, 2013 the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that retroactively requiring a person to register as a sex offender in accordance with laws created in 2...
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
published:16 Mar 2015
views:29
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory who says that the strugg...
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory who says that the strugg...
Judge Bill Southern is a candidate for the North Carolina Court of Appeals (Hunter Seat) in the 2014 Election. Judge Southern currently serves as a District Court Judge for Stokes and Surry Counties. Prior to his election in 2008, he served as an Assistant District Attorney and taught briefly in our state's public schools system.
Find out more about Judge Southern on his website at www.SouthernforJudge.com
Judge Bill Southern is a candidate for the North Carolina Court of Appeals (Hunter Seat) in the 2014 Election. Judge Southern currently serves as a District Court Judge for Stokes and Surry Counties. Prior to his election in 2008, he served as an Assistant District Attorney and taught briefly in our state's public schools system.
Find out more about Judge Southern on his website at www.SouthernforJudge.com
published:16 Sep 2014
views:2
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules: Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
The First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled the filming of police officers, during arrests or otherwise, is a constitutional right protected by the Fir...
The First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled the filming of police officers, during arrests or otherwise, is a constitutional right protected by the Fir...
State of the Nation is a nightly newscast anchored by award-winning broadcast journalist, Jessica Soho. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 9:00 PM (PHL Time) on GMA News TV Channel 11. For more videos from State of the Nation, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/stateofthenation.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
State of the Nation is a nightly newscast anchored by award-winning broadcast journalist, Jessica Soho. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 9:00 PM (PHL Time) on GMA News TV Channel 11. For more videos from State of the Nation, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/stateofthenation.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
published:16 Mar 2015
views:1600
Saksi: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
Saksi is GMA Network's late-night newscast hosted by Arnold Clavio and Pia Arcangel. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 11:30 PM (PHL Time) on GMA-7. For more videos from Saksi, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/saksi.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
Saksi is GMA Network's late-night newscast hosted by Arnold Clavio and Pia Arcangel. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 11:30 PM (PHL Time) on GMA-7. For more videos from Saksi, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/saksi.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
published:16 Mar 2015
views:50
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov New York State Court of Appeals 6/17/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 192974-1 From C-SPAN's Description: On May 31, 2006, New York's hig...
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov New York State Court of Appeals 6/17/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 192974-1 From C-SPAN's Description: On May 31, 2006, New York's hig...
Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould, of Seattle, does not let multiple sclerosis dampen his passion for justice. He focuses on strength...
Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould, of Seattle, does not let multiple sclerosis dampen his passion for justice. He focuses on strength...
Courtesy C-SPAN, Public.Resource.Org The Honorable Harry Pregerson The Honorable Michael Daly Hawkins The Honorable Margaret McKeown Judicial Proceeding Dome...
Courtesy C-SPAN, Public.Resource.Org The Honorable Harry Pregerson The Honorable Michael Daly Hawkins The Honorable Margaret McKeown Judicial Proceeding Dome...
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
City of Seattle police officers appeal from the denial of qualified immunity in an action brought by Nathaniel Caylor and his son W.C., alleging officers unreasonably used excessive force during a response to a 911 call.
41:18
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
The Waseca County Attorney's office appealed Waseca teen John LaDue's dismissed attempted murder charges to the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Jan. 7, 2014.
LaDue is accused of plotting a school shooting.
The video was shot for all press in attendance by KARE 11
153:18
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live progra
120:35
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
50:31
The United States Court of Appeals
The United States Court of Appeals
The United States Court of Appeals
Dr. Stephen Wasby outlines the judicial processes as they relate to the United States Court of Appeals; their circuit jurisdictions; appellate systems; and t...
47:15
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearin
0:00
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
43:35
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7/8/13 Oral Arguments of BP appeal on oil spill claims process
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7/8/13 Oral Arguments of BP appeal on oil spill claims process
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7/8/13 Oral Arguments of BP appeal on oil spill claims process
Full audio of July 8th, 2013 oral arguments in the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Deepwater Horizon claims settlement process. B.P. is contest...
39:36
Indiana Court of Appeals - Oral Arguments - Corbin v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals - Oral Arguments - Corbin v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals - Oral Arguments - Corbin v. State
Moot Court Room, Indiana University Maurer School of Law. September 10, 2013.
52:33
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006. Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of ...
66:05
AZ Court of Appeals: Special Action - Oral Argument re: Double Jeopardy
AZ Court of Appeals: Special Action - Oral Argument re: Double Jeopardy
AZ Court of Appeals: Special Action - Oral Argument re: Double Jeopardy
June 24, 2014 Origin: http://azcourts.gov/coa1/oralarguments.aspx.
29:33
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded t...
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
City of Seattle police officers appeal from the denial of qualified immunity in an action brought by Nathaniel Caylor and his son W.C., alleging officers unreasonably used excessive force during a response to a 911 call.
City of Seattle police officers appeal from the denial of qualified immunity in an action brought by Nathaniel Caylor and his son W.C., alleging officers unreasonably used excessive force during a response to a 911 call.
published:09 Apr 2015
views:65
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
The Waseca County Attorney's office appealed Waseca teen John LaDue's dismissed attempted murder charges to the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Jan. 7, 2014.
LaDue is accused of plotting a school shooting.
The video was shot for all press in attendance by KARE 11
The Waseca County Attorney's office appealed Waseca teen John LaDue's dismissed attempted murder charges to the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Jan. 7, 2014.
LaDue is accused of plotting a school shooting.
The video was shot for all press in attendance by KARE 11
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
published:08 Apr 2011
views:7204
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Dr. Stephen Wasby outlines the judicial processes as they relate to the United States Court of Appeals; their circuit jurisdictions; appellate systems; and t...
Dr. Stephen Wasby outlines the judicial processes as they relate to the United States Court of Appeals; their circuit jurisdictions; appellate systems; and t...
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.
published:30 Jan 2010
views:7822
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Full audio of July 8th, 2013 oral arguments in the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Deepwater Horizon claims settlement process. B.P. is contest...
Full audio of July 8th, 2013 oral arguments in the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Deepwater Horizon claims settlement process. B.P. is contest...
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006. Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of ...
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006. Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of ...
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded t...
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded t...
APTN
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
1. Wide shot police vehicle driving into compound
2. Seven men convicted (then suspected) of killing New Zealand yachtsmen Peter Blake leave vehicle
3. Various men inside police station
TV GLOBO
Macapa, Brazil - January 20002
4. Wide shot courtroom
5. Wide shot convicted men (then accused)
6. Various guns and evidence
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
7. Various Blake's Seamaster boat
8. Mid shot police on board
TV3
Brazil - 2001
9. Wide shot boat
10. Various Blake talking to visitors
11. Blake and crew on board small boats on river
12. Mid shot crocodiles
13. Blake and crew in dinghy
1:45
Luster's lawyer in appeal hearing
Luster's lawyer in appeal hearing
Luster's lawyer in appeal hearing
APTN - 20 June 2003
1. Mid shot of attorney Roger Diamond speaking to reporters.
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"The appelate court is to consider legal errors committed during the course of the trial. And the fact that he (Andrew Luster) fled or didn't flee is irrelevant in terms of the appelate issues to be presented to the court of appeal, which so far we're precluded from doing because the court of appeal dismissed the appeal. We're going to ask the state supreme court to reinstate that appeal to allow the judge's rulings made in the trial court to be reviewed as any criminal defendant has the right to do when he i
2:44
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
APTN
Katsina, Nigeria - 27 August 2003
1. Wide of exterior of courts
2. Mid shot of sign Katsina State Judiciary Sharia Court of Appeal Headquarters
3. Mid shot of riot police guarding court
4. Mid shot of guard
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Aliyu Musa, Defence Lawyer:
"We are certain and we are confident the appeal will succeed and the death sentence will be set aside."
6. Musa talking to two men at courthouse
7. Amina Lawal getting out of car carrying baby
8. Amina Lawal walking to court
9. Amina Lawal entering court
10. Various of Amina and daughter sitting in courthouse
11. Amina Lawal crying
12. Amina's councillors comforting Am
1:40
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
SHOTLIST
ALL TOKO MATERIAL
1. Car pulls into main entrance to Shariah court
2. Sign
3. Various of soldiers outside court
4. Amina Lawal gets out of car carrying baby
5. Lawal walks into court
6. Court officials
7. Lawal holding baby talking to her lawyer Hauwa Ibrahim
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer representing Amina Lawal:
"We are expecting to see Amina discharged and acquitted and we hope that she will have a life, a normal life for herself."
9. Ibrahim sitting in court
10. Interior of court
11. Judges sitting in court
12. Close up of Lawal sitting in court
13. People peering through windows into court
2:26
Federal court postpones recall
Federal court postpones recall
Federal court postpones recall
APTN
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
1. Walk up view of California Governor Gray Davis
2. Cutaway reporters
3. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"This recall has been like a roller coaster, there are more surprises than you can possibly imagine and I'm just going to keep focused, keep telling people why I think this recall is bad for them."
4. Cutaway reporters & cameramen
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"Lets wait until the court decides and have we seen a few surprises in this election. I mean the guy who put this on the ballot, Darrell Issa doesn't run .. Bill Simon doesn't
1:40
Appeals court clears militant leader of treason
Appeals court clears militant leader of treason
Appeals court clears militant leader of treason
1. Wide shot of Islamic militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir inside prison compound
2. Various shots of Bashir, supporters and media
3. SOUNDBITE (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"In our opinion, (this is) already, you know something like, against the law. We call it unlawful detention. So we will protest it."
4. Cameraman
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"Abu Bakar Bashir, of course, now demands his right to be released. Because he agrees with us that he is put in detention without any legal ground."
6. Bashir returning to his prison cell
7. SOUNDBITE: (Indonesian) Fauzan, Bashir supporter:
"He (Bashir) is being
3:20
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Bali bomber
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Bali bomber
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Bali bomber
NB: wrong slate on tape, story correct
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
1. Wide exterior of Indonesia's Supreme Court
2. Sign of the Court
3. Mid shot of Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto talking to journalists
4. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Toton Suprapto, Supreme Court judge:
"We have made a decision in this case to uphold the ruling of both District and High courts. The Supreme Court found no misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
5. Exterior pan of Supreme Court
6. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"We will immediately suggest to Amrozi to file for judicial revie
2:09
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
Washington, DC - December 18, 2003
1. Various of ruling from federal appeals court in San Francisco
New York, New York - December 18, 2003
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very bad day for the (US) administration but it is a very good day for the (US) Constitution. Our federal courts are asserting their own authority to serve as independent checks on executive power, even during times of national security."
3. Close-up of court ruling
4. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very important ruling. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
2:09
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
1. Exterior court house where tribunal held
2. Journalists inside awaiting verdict
3. Close up sign "court of appeal"
4. Various of people walking up stairs towards courtroom
5. Close up policeman
6. People waiting outside courtroom
7. People coming out after ruling, pro-Battisti woman shouting her protest
8. SOUNDBITE: (French) Yves Cochet, French Green Party member of parliament:
"This judgement is of course absolutely iniquitous and we regret this decision. I think that France is selling itself short. It was, is and we hope it always will be a place of refuge and of human rights, and so it has to show it."
9. People leaving court
1:52
Court rules Pinochet was aware of abuses
Court rules Pinochet was aware of abuses
Court rules Pinochet was aware of abuses
1. Appellate Court door sign
2. Various FILE pictures of Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet
3. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Emilio Cheyre, Chilean Armed Forces Commander:
"The speculations about General Pinochet are hurtful. I know first hand of his worsening physical condition, of his suffering, of his notable lack of ability in many aspects."
4. FILE of Pinochet walking
5. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Pinochet's attorney:
"Going out for a walk or to a restaurant doesn't mean that you are capable of facing a judicial process. It is one thing to defend yourself in a court of law and another to go out on the street for a wa
3:18
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
1. Exterior Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General, Court of Arbitration for Sport CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition, so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has been upheld by CAS, so it has decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury should be reinstated as well."
2:56
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
SHOTLIST
1. Various exteriors of Court of Appeal
2. Police outside the court
3. Media pack surrounding one of the defendants
4. Defendant arriving
5. Various of lawyers and defendants arriving
6. Various of Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arriving in a car
7. Juppe getting out of car
8. Cameras, pan to Juppe's lawyer Jean-Rene Farthouat (on the left) standing outside the court
9. Juppe leaving court and getting into a car
10. Car driving away
11. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Rene Farthouat, former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe's lawyer:
"Listen, he (Juppe) kept his promise to explain himself as well as he could. He said
86:19
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
IP and Advocacy by Judge Alex Kozinski, former Chief Judge of the United States, Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Chaired by: The Rt Hon Professor Sir Robin Jacob, Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law, UCL Laws
About the speaker and the lecture
Judge Alex Kozinski was appointed to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in 1985 and was its Chief Judge from 2007 until 2014. He heard many IP cases (other than patents), the 9th Circuit including within it Hollywood and other creative centres.
In this lecture, Judge Kozinski talks about the challenge that IP cases present to judges. He speaks of its growing importance an
1:12
Three Americans appeal against torture charges
Three Americans appeal against torture charges
Three Americans appeal against torture charges
1. National Security Appeals Court exterior
2. Various of Americans walking into court
3. Various of guards standing outside court
4. White van drives by with Americans inside
5. SOUNDBITE: (Pashtu) Mohammed Ismail Habed, Head of Appeals Court:
"We met the American prisoners today. It was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence."
6. Pen, eyeglasses and paper on table
STORYLINE:
Three Americans sentenced to eight to 10 years in jail for torturing Afghans on a freelance hunt for terror
0:59
Court cuts sentences in killing of Catholic bishop
Court cuts sentences in killing of Catholic bishop
Court cuts sentences in killing of Catholic bishop
SHOTLIST
Guatemala City - June 8, 2001
1. Accused entering courtroom
2. Close up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
3. Close up Reverend Mario Orantes
4. Close up retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada
5. Wide of accused
6. Close up Margarita Lopez (Gerardi's cook)
7. Close up Obdulio Villanueva
8. Wide of courtroom
9. Wide of accused
10. Close up retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada
11. Close up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
12. Close up Obdulio Villanueva
13. Close up Priest Mario Orantes
14. Tilt up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
15. Wide of courtroom, judges reading sentence
STORYLINE
A Guatemala appeals court on Tuesday reduced prison s
1:42
Court refuses to strip Pinochet of immunity to allow trial
Court refuses to strip Pinochet of immunity to allow trial
Court refuses to strip Pinochet of immunity to allow trial
Santiago - 24 March 2005
1. Wide of Supreme Court justices
2. Close up of justice
3. Augusto Pinochet's defence attorney Pablo Rodriguez before court
4. Human rights lawyer before court
5. Pan of Carlos Prats' relatives and lawyers at hearing
6. Close up Rodriguez
7. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Augusto Pinochet's defence attorney:
"I am extremely satisfied with this ruling because it means there is no basis for trying General Pinochet for something so horrible and terrifying as was found out in the original investigation in Argentina and later in Chile."
8. Pan of court
9. Various of audience at hearing
11. Exterior court
3:20
Bush chooses conservative appeal judge John Roberts Jr. for Supreme Court
Bush chooses conservative appeal judge John Roberts Jr. for Supreme Court
Bush chooses conservative appeal judge John Roberts Jr. for Supreme Court
1. US President George W. Bush and judge John G. Roberts enter the press conference room
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"Good evening. One of the most consequential decisions a president makes is his appointment of a Justice to the Supreme Court. When a president chooses a Justice, he is placing in human hands the authority and majesty of the Law. The decisions of the Supreme Court affect the lives of every American, and so a nominee to that court must be a person of superb credentials and the highest integrity. A person who would faithfully apply the constitution and keep our founding promise of equal justice under l
2:01
Lawyer comment on detainee being tried by military tribunal
Lawyer comment on detainee being tried by military tribunal
Lawyer comment on detainee being tried by military tribunal
SHOTLIST
APTN
Washington DC, USA - 31 January 2005
1. Exteriors of US District court house
2. US flag flying
APTN
Washington DC, USA - 15 July 2005
3. Lead attorney for Salim Hamdan, Professor Neal Katyal
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Professor Neal Katyal / Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan
"I was quite surprised that the Court of Appeals took such a broad view of presidential power, a view that I think our founders would have really rebelled against for they set up a role of limited government, not one of concentrated power in the executive branch"
APTN
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba - 6 July
2:30
Democrat Senator comments on Supreme Court nominee
Democrat Senator comments on Supreme Court nominee
Democrat Senator comments on Supreme Court nominee
SHOTLIST
1. California Senator Dianne Feinstein walking on stage
2. Wide shot of audience
3. Close-up of woman sitting in audience
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"It''s crucial that the nominee who replaces Justice O''Connor not only be intelligent and well qualified but balanced and fair. His views should be within the mainstream and considered and they should be without bias. In other words, extreme ideology from the right or the left is unacceptable.
5. Cutaway of audience
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"It would be very difficult for me to vote to confirm someone to t
1:43
London bombing suspect appeals extradition ruling
London bombing suspect appeals extradition ruling
London bombing suspect appeals extradition ruling
SHOTLIST
Rome, 26 August 2005
1. Appeals court
2. Defence lawyer, Antonietta Sonnessa exiting the court
3. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Hamdi Issac''s lawyer:
"I''m filing an appeal request in Cassation Court against the decision which was issued on August 17th."
4. Flags
5. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Hamdi Issac''s lawyer:
"I expect that my request will be accepted concerning the verification of the expert report and then that there might be more investigations on the event."
6. Lawyer Sonnessa outside Appeal Court
7. Copy of appeal documents
8. SOUNDBITE: (English) Paolo Iorio, lawyer representi
2:25
Appeal hearing for UK bombing suspect, lawyer comments
Appeal hearing for UK bombing suspect, lawyer comments
Appeal hearing for UK bombing suspect, lawyer comments
SHOTLIST
1. Exterior of appeals Court Rome
2. Italian flag on courthouse
3. Traffic police car
4. Lawyer representing the British Government Paolo Iorio enters courthouse
UPSOUND (English) Paolo Iorio, Lawyer representing British Government
"Later at the end of the hearing" (responding to reporter question about when the court decision is expected)
5. Wide of lawyers and journalists in hallway
6. Cutaway police outside courtroom
7. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Defence Lawyer
(regarding Hamdi Issac's state of mind) "Well, the frame of mind of a person waiting for an important decision - important because he didn't agr
2:03
Ex-police officers on trial for journalist's killing
Ex-police officers on trial for journalist's killing
Ex-police officers on trial for journalist's killing
SHOTLIST
Kiev - 9 Jan 2006
1. Wide exterior of Kiev Court of Appeals
2. Staircase inside the courthouse, crowd of journalists waiting outside
3. Miroslava, widow of slain journalist Heorhiy Gongadze entering
4. Wide shot court session
5. Close up shot presiding judge at the trial
6. Wide shot court session
7. Mid shot Miroslava, centre, during the session
8. Mid shot prosecutors
9. Wide shot court session
10. Miroslava Gongadze surrounded by journalists outside the courtroom
11. SOUNDBITE (Ukrainian) Miroslava Gongadze, Widow of slain journalist Heorhiy Gongadze:
"We are going to summon many witnesses, including witne
3:07
WRAP Bush calls for fair hearings for Supreme Court nominee, plus more hearings
WRAP Bush calls for fair hearings for Supreme Court nominee, plus more hearings
WRAP Bush calls for fair hearings for Supreme Court nominee, plus more hearings
US POOL
The Capitol, Washington, DC 09 September 2006
1. Wide shot of Alito with Senate Judiciary Committee members
2. Wide shot of chamber
3. Close-up of Alito
4. SOUNDBITE (English: Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
"I am committed as Chairman to a full, fair and dignified hearing. Hearings for a Supreme Court nominee should not have a political tilt for either Republicans or Democrats - they should be in substance and perception for all Americans."
5. Alito listening / Alito cutaway
6. SOUNDBITE: Senator Edward Kennedy, Democrat, Massachusettes:
"Ultimately the cour
APTN
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
1. Wide shot police vehicle driving into compound
2. Seven men convicted (then suspected) of killing New Zealand yachtsmen Peter Blake leave vehicle
3. Various men inside police station
TV GLOBO
Macapa, Brazil - January 20002
4. Wide shot courtroom
5. Wide shot convicted men (then accused)
6. Various guns and evidence
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
7. Various Blake's Seamaster boat
8. Mid shot police on board
TV3
Brazil - 2001
9. Wide shot boat
10. Various Blake talking to visitors
11. Blake and crew on board small boats on river
12. Mid shot crocodiles
13. Blake and crew in dinghy
14. Blake on beach, looks towards camera
TV GLOBO
Rio de Janeiro - September 2001
15. Blake laughing on board boat
APTN
Warbington, Hampshire, UK - December 2001
16. Wide shot Blake's funeral
17. Mid shot New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark
18. Mid shot British yachtswoman Ellen MacArthur
19. Various coffin being carried through graveyard
STORYLINE:
The Brazilian court of appeals on Tuesday is scheduled to give it's ruling on the six men convicted of killing New Zealand yachtsman Peter Blake in June 2002.
The Macapa courtroom has reviewed the cases of the six men who were sentenced to more than 20 years each for killing and robbing the sailing great during a failed robbery attempt on the Amazon river in Brazil in December 2001.
Ricardo Colares Tavares, who confessed to firing the fatal shots, received the maximum sentence of more than 36 years.
Five others received sentences ranging from 35 years to 26 years.
Several of the sentences were largely symbolic, because under Brazilian law no one can serve more than 30 years in prison at a single stretch.
Peter Blake who led New Zealand to America's Cup victories in 1995 and 2000, was on a worldwide expedition to monitor global warming and pollution when he was killed.
He was returning from a two-month stay in the upper reaches of the Amazon and Rio Negro rivers at the time of the robbery near Macapa, 1,800 miles (2,800 km) northwest of Rio de Janeiro.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/1751b6c76936671136c4a979a8c8167c
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
APTN
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
1. Wide shot police vehicle driving into compound
2. Seven men convicted (then suspected) of killing New Zealand yachtsmen Peter Blake leave vehicle
3. Various men inside police station
TV GLOBO
Macapa, Brazil - January 20002
4. Wide shot courtroom
5. Wide shot convicted men (then accused)
6. Various guns and evidence
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
7. Various Blake's Seamaster boat
8. Mid shot police on board
TV3
Brazil - 2001
9. Wide shot boat
10. Various Blake talking to visitors
11. Blake and crew on board small boats on river
12. Mid shot crocodiles
13. Blake and crew in dinghy
14. Blake on beach, looks towards camera
TV GLOBO
Rio de Janeiro - September 2001
15. Blake laughing on board boat
APTN
Warbington, Hampshire, UK - December 2001
16. Wide shot Blake's funeral
17. Mid shot New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark
18. Mid shot British yachtswoman Ellen MacArthur
19. Various coffin being carried through graveyard
STORYLINE:
The Brazilian court of appeals on Tuesday is scheduled to give it's ruling on the six men convicted of killing New Zealand yachtsman Peter Blake in June 2002.
The Macapa courtroom has reviewed the cases of the six men who were sentenced to more than 20 years each for killing and robbing the sailing great during a failed robbery attempt on the Amazon river in Brazil in December 2001.
Ricardo Colares Tavares, who confessed to firing the fatal shots, received the maximum sentence of more than 36 years.
Five others received sentences ranging from 35 years to 26 years.
Several of the sentences were largely symbolic, because under Brazilian law no one can serve more than 30 years in prison at a single stretch.
Peter Blake who led New Zealand to America's Cup victories in 1995 and 2000, was on a worldwide expedition to monitor global warming and pollution when he was killed.
He was returning from a two-month stay in the upper reaches of the Amazon and Rio Negro rivers at the time of the robbery near Macapa, 1,800 miles (2,800 km) northwest of Rio de Janeiro.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/1751b6c76936671136c4a979a8c8167c
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
APTN - 20 June 2003
1. Mid shot of attorney Roger Diamond speaking to reporters.
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"The appelate court is to consider legal errors committed during the course of the trial. And the fact that he (Andrew Luster) fled or didn't flee is irrelevant in terms of the appelate issues to be presented to the court of appeal, which so far we're precluded from doing because the court of appeal dismissed the appeal. We're going to ask the state supreme court to reinstate that appeal to allow the judge's rulings made in the trial court to be reviewed as any criminal defendant has the right to do when he is convicted."
POOL - 19 June 2003
3. Close shot of Andrew Luster in custody led by US officials to car.
APTN - 20 June 2003
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"They're basically keeping him incommunicado. We couldn't speak to him, obviously, on the plane. He was considered to be in custody. When he arrived at LA International Airport he was considered to be in custody and we didn't have a visit. We couldn't visit with him. And he was taken immediately to a state facility up in Kern County to be designated. And the position of the state authorities is that until he's designated to some institution he cannot have visitors. I disagree with that and we're working on that now to get him access."
POOL - 19 June 2003
5. Close shot of Luster inside car.
APTN - 20 June 2003
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"I mean if he said to me, 'Roger don't appeal', I could dismiss it in a moment. I can guarantee you that he wants the appeal to go forward only because that's my intuition. But I've had no contact with him at all."
POOL - 19 June 2003
7. Close shot of Luster in car seated next to US official. Mid shot of car pulling away.
STORYLINE
An appeal has been filed on behalf of Max Factor cosmetics heir and convicted rapist Andrew Luster.
Luster's attorney, Roger Diamond, filed papers in Los Angeles on Friday, asking the California Supreme Court to consider whether Luster can appeal his conviction.
Luster was captured in Mexico this week after skipping out on his trial.
An appeals court had ruled against considering an appeal of Luster's rape conviction, saying he had given up that right when he became a fugitive.
But Diamond said Luster's return to the US allowed him to beat a deadline for seeking the action.
Luster was captured by bounty hunters on Wednesday in Mexico and later arrested by authorities there.
He was flown to Los Angeles on Thursday and transferred to a state facility.
Luster was convicted in absentia in January of drugging and raping three women.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/1d75dafbe3d3e6aa5d6aedf5e97e2e2e
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
APTN - 20 June 2003
1. Mid shot of attorney Roger Diamond speaking to reporters.
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"The appelate court is to consider legal errors committed during the course of the trial. And the fact that he (Andrew Luster) fled or didn't flee is irrelevant in terms of the appelate issues to be presented to the court of appeal, which so far we're precluded from doing because the court of appeal dismissed the appeal. We're going to ask the state supreme court to reinstate that appeal to allow the judge's rulings made in the trial court to be reviewed as any criminal defendant has the right to do when he is convicted."
POOL - 19 June 2003
3. Close shot of Andrew Luster in custody led by US officials to car.
APTN - 20 June 2003
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"They're basically keeping him incommunicado. We couldn't speak to him, obviously, on the plane. He was considered to be in custody. When he arrived at LA International Airport he was considered to be in custody and we didn't have a visit. We couldn't visit with him. And he was taken immediately to a state facility up in Kern County to be designated. And the position of the state authorities is that until he's designated to some institution he cannot have visitors. I disagree with that and we're working on that now to get him access."
POOL - 19 June 2003
5. Close shot of Luster inside car.
APTN - 20 June 2003
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"I mean if he said to me, 'Roger don't appeal', I could dismiss it in a moment. I can guarantee you that he wants the appeal to go forward only because that's my intuition. But I've had no contact with him at all."
POOL - 19 June 2003
7. Close shot of Luster in car seated next to US official. Mid shot of car pulling away.
STORYLINE
An appeal has been filed on behalf of Max Factor cosmetics heir and convicted rapist Andrew Luster.
Luster's attorney, Roger Diamond, filed papers in Los Angeles on Friday, asking the California Supreme Court to consider whether Luster can appeal his conviction.
Luster was captured in Mexico this week after skipping out on his trial.
An appeals court had ruled against considering an appeal of Luster's rape conviction, saying he had given up that right when he became a fugitive.
But Diamond said Luster's return to the US allowed him to beat a deadline for seeking the action.
Luster was captured by bounty hunters on Wednesday in Mexico and later arrested by authorities there.
He was flown to Los Angeles on Thursday and transferred to a state facility.
Luster was convicted in absentia in January of drugging and raping three women.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/1d75dafbe3d3e6aa5d6aedf5e97e2e2e
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
APTN
Katsina, Nigeria - 27 August 2003
1. Wide of exterior of courts
2. Mid shot of sign Katsina State Judiciary Sharia Court of Appeal Headquarters
3. Mid shot of riot police guarding court
4. Mid shot of guard
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Aliyu Musa, Defence Lawyer:
"We are certain and we are confident the appeal will succeed and the death sentence will be set aside."
6. Musa talking to two men at courthouse
7. Amina Lawal getting out of car carrying baby
8. Amina Lawal walking to court
9. Amina Lawal entering court
10. Various of Amina and daughter sitting in courthouse
11. Amina Lawal crying
12. Amina's councillors comforting Amina
13. Marie Poulain, Lawyers Without Borders at court
14. SOUNDBITE: (English) Marie Poulain, Avocats Sans Frontieres (Lawyers Without Borders):
"As lawyers we are always ready for the worst but we still are quite hopeful. We must always be ready."
15. Sharia judges entering court
16. Judges sitting down
17. Lawyers at court looking at judges
18. People leaving courthouse
19. Interior of courthouse with judge leaving
20. Three judges talking while leaving
21. Lawyers leaving court
22. Exterior of court with Amina Lawal walking with lawyers
23. SOUNDBITE: (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer of Amina Lawal:
"My expectations as a lawyer, I hope, I am hopeful we did .... so that she (Amina) will be discharged and acquitted on the 25th of September by the grace of God. However, we are always prepared for the worst. Just in case we fail, we are going to go to the courts of appeal in Kaduna."
24. Hauwa Ibrahim carrying Amina Lawal's baby while Amina sits in a car
25. Various of riot police outside court
26. Lawyers laughing outside courthouse
STORYLINE:
Lawyers in Nigeria argued on Wednesday for the life of a single mother sentenced to death by stoning for adultery.
The condemned woman nursed her toddler during the hearing in the northern Islamic court which was deciding her fate.
Thirty-two-year-old Amina Lawal appeared overwhelmed by the crush of riot police, journalists and rights workers as she appeared for her hearing.
Thirty-five riot police ringed the courthouse, the heaviest security yet in what has been more than a year of off-and-on hearings.
Lawal, a divorced woman, was convicted of adultery in March 2002 by an Islamic court following the birth of her daughter, Wasila, out of wedlock.
Acting on the Islamic law, or Shariah, adopted in a dozen predominantly Muslim northern Nigerian states, judges ordered Lawal be buried up to her neck in sand and then stoned to death.
While her appeals continue, judges have ordered Lawal's execution postponed until she weans the child born of her extramarital affair.
The alleged father of the baby denied responsibility and was acquitted.
As the case opened in a stifling court room, Lawal appeared distracted from proceedings, nursing and playing with her child.
She rarely watched the lawyers, at one point falling asleep, with her daughter also nodding off in her arms.
Nearly an hour into the hearing, the chief judge, or Grand Khadi, Aminu Ibrahim, warned the more than dozen volunteer and charity-appointed attorneys clamouring to give arguments on Lawal's behalf, not to stall their appeals.
Katsina state authorities have insisted the case go through the Shariah appeals process despite requests by Nigeria's federal government that Lawal be freed.
Past hearings have repeatedly been cancelled, in what some have suspected is an attempt to deflect attention following international campaigns by rights movements and women's groups.
punishment.
Lawal and her former husband divorced two years before the baby was born.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/00b2bbad0bbd0f2100a4d1f420036fa7
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
APTN
Katsina, Nigeria - 27 August 2003
1. Wide of exterior of courts
2. Mid shot of sign Katsina State Judiciary Sharia Court of Appeal Headquarters
3. Mid shot of riot police guarding court
4. Mid shot of guard
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Aliyu Musa, Defence Lawyer:
"We are certain and we are confident the appeal will succeed and the death sentence will be set aside."
6. Musa talking to two men at courthouse
7. Amina Lawal getting out of car carrying baby
8. Amina Lawal walking to court
9. Amina Lawal entering court
10. Various of Amina and daughter sitting in courthouse
11. Amina Lawal crying
12. Amina's councillors comforting Amina
13. Marie Poulain, Lawyers Without Borders at court
14. SOUNDBITE: (English) Marie Poulain, Avocats Sans Frontieres (Lawyers Without Borders):
"As lawyers we are always ready for the worst but we still are quite hopeful. We must always be ready."
15. Sharia judges entering court
16. Judges sitting down
17. Lawyers at court looking at judges
18. People leaving courthouse
19. Interior of courthouse with judge leaving
20. Three judges talking while leaving
21. Lawyers leaving court
22. Exterior of court with Amina Lawal walking with lawyers
23. SOUNDBITE: (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer of Amina Lawal:
"My expectations as a lawyer, I hope, I am hopeful we did .... so that she (Amina) will be discharged and acquitted on the 25th of September by the grace of God. However, we are always prepared for the worst. Just in case we fail, we are going to go to the courts of appeal in Kaduna."
24. Hauwa Ibrahim carrying Amina Lawal's baby while Amina sits in a car
25. Various of riot police outside court
26. Lawyers laughing outside courthouse
STORYLINE:
Lawyers in Nigeria argued on Wednesday for the life of a single mother sentenced to death by stoning for adultery.
The condemned woman nursed her toddler during the hearing in the northern Islamic court which was deciding her fate.
Thirty-two-year-old Amina Lawal appeared overwhelmed by the crush of riot police, journalists and rights workers as she appeared for her hearing.
Thirty-five riot police ringed the courthouse, the heaviest security yet in what has been more than a year of off-and-on hearings.
Lawal, a divorced woman, was convicted of adultery in March 2002 by an Islamic court following the birth of her daughter, Wasila, out of wedlock.
Acting on the Islamic law, or Shariah, adopted in a dozen predominantly Muslim northern Nigerian states, judges ordered Lawal be buried up to her neck in sand and then stoned to death.
While her appeals continue, judges have ordered Lawal's execution postponed until she weans the child born of her extramarital affair.
The alleged father of the baby denied responsibility and was acquitted.
As the case opened in a stifling court room, Lawal appeared distracted from proceedings, nursing and playing with her child.
She rarely watched the lawyers, at one point falling asleep, with her daughter also nodding off in her arms.
Nearly an hour into the hearing, the chief judge, or Grand Khadi, Aminu Ibrahim, warned the more than dozen volunteer and charity-appointed attorneys clamouring to give arguments on Lawal's behalf, not to stall their appeals.
Katsina state authorities have insisted the case go through the Shariah appeals process despite requests by Nigeria's federal government that Lawal be freed.
Past hearings have repeatedly been cancelled, in what some have suspected is an attempt to deflect attention following international campaigns by rights movements and women's groups.
punishment.
Lawal and her former husband divorced two years before the baby was born.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/00b2bbad0bbd0f2100a4d1f420036fa7
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
SHOTLIST
ALL TOKO MATERIAL
1. Car pulls into main entrance to Shariah court
2. Sign
3. Various of soldiers outside court
4. Amina Lawal gets out of car carrying baby
5. Lawal walks into court
6. Court officials
7. Lawal holding baby talking to her lawyer Hauwa Ibrahim
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer representing Amina Lawal:
"We are expecting to see Amina discharged and acquitted and we hope that she will have a life, a normal life for herself."
9. Ibrahim sitting in court
10. Interior of court
11. Judges sitting in court
12. Close up of Lawal sitting in court
13. People peering through windows into court
14. Close up of judge's hands
15. Close up of judge reading out verdict UPSOUND (Hausa) "She's been acquitted"
16. People getting up to leave courtroom
17. SOUNDBITE (English) Catherine Mabille, representative of Lawyers without Borders, who had been advising the defence:
"Well, you know, as lawyers, we are always sceptical. So we are very happy now. But we were expecting that".
18. Lawal coming out of court holding baby
STORYLINE
An Islamic appeals court in northern Nigeria on Thursday overturned the conviction of a single mother facing death by stoning for having sex out of wedlock in a case that has drawn world attention and dragged on for over a year.
A five-judge panel at the Katsina State Shariah Court of Appeals rejected Amina Lawal's conviction four to one, saying she was not given "ample opportunity to defend herself".
In an hour-long ruling, the judges said Lawal was not caught in the act and wasn't given enough time to understand the charges against her.
They also cited procedural errors, including that only one judge was present at her initial conviction in March 2002, instead of the three required under Islamic law.
Judge Ibrahim Mai-Unguwa, reading the verdict, said the court accepted Lawal's appeal and she was free to go.
Lawal, wrapped in a light orange veil, sat on a metal chair, eyes downcast, cradling her nearly two-year-old daughter.
After the verdict, police and lawyers hustled her out of the room before she could answer journalists' questions.
If Lawal's sentence had been carried out, the 32-year-old would have been the first woman stoned to death since 12 northern states first began adopting strict Islamic law, or Shariah, in 1999.
She was first convicted in March 2002 following the birth of her daughter two years after she divorced her husband.
Judges rejected Lawal's first appeal in August 2002.
Prosecutors argued Lawal's child was living proof she committed a crime under Shariah.
But her defence team argued that under some interpretations of Shariah, babies can remain in gestation in a mother's womb for five years, opening the possibility her ex-husband could have fathered the child.
They also argued Lawal's case should be dropped because no lawyers were present when she first testified she'd slept with another man following her divorce.
They said Lawal - a poor, uneducated woman from a rural family - didn't understand the charges against her at the time.
Lawal has identified her alleged sexual partner and said he promised to marry her.
The alleged partner, who would also have faced a stoning sentence, has denied any impropriety and has been acquitted for lack of evidence.
Lawal was the second Nigerian woman to have been condemned to death for having sex out of wedlock under Islamic law.
The first woman, Safiya Hussaini, had her sentence overturned in March on her first appeal in the city of Sokoto - the
same time that Lawal was first convicted.
Lawal's case drew sharp criticism from international rights groups.
Last week, Brazil even offered her asylum.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9454a5b3cf5cb8448514b158d9918c14
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
ALL TOKO MATERIAL
1. Car pulls into main entrance to Shariah court
2. Sign
3. Various of soldiers outside court
4. Amina Lawal gets out of car carrying baby
5. Lawal walks into court
6. Court officials
7. Lawal holding baby talking to her lawyer Hauwa Ibrahim
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer representing Amina Lawal:
"We are expecting to see Amina discharged and acquitted and we hope that she will have a life, a normal life for herself."
9. Ibrahim sitting in court
10. Interior of court
11. Judges sitting in court
12. Close up of Lawal sitting in court
13. People peering through windows into court
14. Close up of judge's hands
15. Close up of judge reading out verdict UPSOUND (Hausa) "She's been acquitted"
16. People getting up to leave courtroom
17. SOUNDBITE (English) Catherine Mabille, representative of Lawyers without Borders, who had been advising the defence:
"Well, you know, as lawyers, we are always sceptical. So we are very happy now. But we were expecting that".
18. Lawal coming out of court holding baby
STORYLINE
An Islamic appeals court in northern Nigeria on Thursday overturned the conviction of a single mother facing death by stoning for having sex out of wedlock in a case that has drawn world attention and dragged on for over a year.
A five-judge panel at the Katsina State Shariah Court of Appeals rejected Amina Lawal's conviction four to one, saying she was not given "ample opportunity to defend herself".
In an hour-long ruling, the judges said Lawal was not caught in the act and wasn't given enough time to understand the charges against her.
They also cited procedural errors, including that only one judge was present at her initial conviction in March 2002, instead of the three required under Islamic law.
Judge Ibrahim Mai-Unguwa, reading the verdict, said the court accepted Lawal's appeal and she was free to go.
Lawal, wrapped in a light orange veil, sat on a metal chair, eyes downcast, cradling her nearly two-year-old daughter.
After the verdict, police and lawyers hustled her out of the room before she could answer journalists' questions.
If Lawal's sentence had been carried out, the 32-year-old would have been the first woman stoned to death since 12 northern states first began adopting strict Islamic law, or Shariah, in 1999.
She was first convicted in March 2002 following the birth of her daughter two years after she divorced her husband.
Judges rejected Lawal's first appeal in August 2002.
Prosecutors argued Lawal's child was living proof she committed a crime under Shariah.
But her defence team argued that under some interpretations of Shariah, babies can remain in gestation in a mother's womb for five years, opening the possibility her ex-husband could have fathered the child.
They also argued Lawal's case should be dropped because no lawyers were present when she first testified she'd slept with another man following her divorce.
They said Lawal - a poor, uneducated woman from a rural family - didn't understand the charges against her at the time.
Lawal has identified her alleged sexual partner and said he promised to marry her.
The alleged partner, who would also have faced a stoning sentence, has denied any impropriety and has been acquitted for lack of evidence.
Lawal was the second Nigerian woman to have been condemned to death for having sex out of wedlock under Islamic law.
The first woman, Safiya Hussaini, had her sentence overturned in March on her first appeal in the city of Sokoto - the
same time that Lawal was first convicted.
Lawal's case drew sharp criticism from international rights groups.
Last week, Brazil even offered her asylum.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9454a5b3cf5cb8448514b158d9918c14
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
APTN
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
1. Walk up view of California Governor Gray Davis
2. Cutaway reporters
3. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"This recall has been like a roller coaster, there are more surprises than you can possibly imagine and I'm just going to keep focused, keep telling people why I think this recall is bad for them."
4. Cutaway reporters & cameramen
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"Lets wait until the court decides and have we seen a few surprises in this election. I mean the guy who put this on the ballot, Darrell Issa doesn't run .. Bill Simon doesn't run."
APTN
Washington, DC - September 15, 2003
6. Walk in view of Darryl Issa
7. SOUNDBITE: (English) Congressman Darrell Issa, (Republican - California):
"In its decision to delay the recall election the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals attempts a judicial hijacking of the electoral process. A panel of three liberal judges, all appointed by Democrats are asking us to believe that the very voting systems that were used in the last election to elect Gray Davis aren't good enough to remove Gray Davis."
8. Mid view Issa speaking to reporters
9. SOUNDBITE: (English) Congressman Darrell Issa (Republican - California):
"You know the people of California - 1.2million plus - have asked for this election. One thing that people need to be aware of is Californians have already voted. Everyday absentee ballots are coming back now. People have already cast their votes. They would be disenfranchised if this was delayed or overturned."
POOL
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
10. Wide view of ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) news conference
11. SOUNDBITE: (English) Ben Wizner, ACLU spokesman:
"I want to reinforce, as we have reinforced before that the American Civil Liberties Union takes no position on the recall. Whether there should be a recall, whether the Governor ought to be recalled and who his replacement ought to be. We have no idea who this opinion will benefit - whether it will benefit one side or another. But we do know is that voters in six counties, who comprise 44 per cent of California's electorate, will be the winners here and all Californians will be the winners here because the election will be fair and all votes will be afforded equal weight and dignity."
APTN
12. SOUNDBITE: (English) Vox Pop:
"Well I don't think we should be doing it at all, period. I feel that you get what you get and that we shouldn't have a recall."
13. SOUNDBITE: (English) Vox Pop:
"Its going to help him - he will have more time to campaign."
15. Mid view streets
STORYLINE:
A United States Federal appeals court postponed the October 7 California Governor's recall election Monday in a decision that threw an already chaotic campaign into utter turmoil.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not set a new date, but ruled that the election cannot proceed as scheduled because some votes would be cast using outmoded punch-card ballot machines.
The decision applies to all the recall questions on the ballot, as well as two propositions.
The court, the nation's largest and most liberal federal appeals court, withheld ordering the immediate implementation of its decision by a week to allow time for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Governor Gray Davis said he expected the case to go to a higher court.
Davis, speaking after appearing with former President Bill Clinton said: "This recall has been like a roller coaster. There are more surprises than you can possibly imagine."
He added that he would continue to make his case to the people that a recall is not good for the state.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/d08d43ca2127ed72e6bb0050a59f0bd7
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
APTN
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
1. Walk up view of California Governor Gray Davis
2. Cutaway reporters
3. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"This recall has been like a roller coaster, there are more surprises than you can possibly imagine and I'm just going to keep focused, keep telling people why I think this recall is bad for them."
4. Cutaway reporters & cameramen
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"Lets wait until the court decides and have we seen a few surprises in this election. I mean the guy who put this on the ballot, Darrell Issa doesn't run .. Bill Simon doesn't run."
APTN
Washington, DC - September 15, 2003
6. Walk in view of Darryl Issa
7. SOUNDBITE: (English) Congressman Darrell Issa, (Republican - California):
"In its decision to delay the recall election the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals attempts a judicial hijacking of the electoral process. A panel of three liberal judges, all appointed by Democrats are asking us to believe that the very voting systems that were used in the last election to elect Gray Davis aren't good enough to remove Gray Davis."
8. Mid view Issa speaking to reporters
9. SOUNDBITE: (English) Congressman Darrell Issa (Republican - California):
"You know the people of California - 1.2million plus - have asked for this election. One thing that people need to be aware of is Californians have already voted. Everyday absentee ballots are coming back now. People have already cast their votes. They would be disenfranchised if this was delayed or overturned."
POOL
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
10. Wide view of ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) news conference
11. SOUNDBITE: (English) Ben Wizner, ACLU spokesman:
"I want to reinforce, as we have reinforced before that the American Civil Liberties Union takes no position on the recall. Whether there should be a recall, whether the Governor ought to be recalled and who his replacement ought to be. We have no idea who this opinion will benefit - whether it will benefit one side or another. But we do know is that voters in six counties, who comprise 44 per cent of California's electorate, will be the winners here and all Californians will be the winners here because the election will be fair and all votes will be afforded equal weight and dignity."
APTN
12. SOUNDBITE: (English) Vox Pop:
"Well I don't think we should be doing it at all, period. I feel that you get what you get and that we shouldn't have a recall."
13. SOUNDBITE: (English) Vox Pop:
"Its going to help him - he will have more time to campaign."
15. Mid view streets
STORYLINE:
A United States Federal appeals court postponed the October 7 California Governor's recall election Monday in a decision that threw an already chaotic campaign into utter turmoil.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not set a new date, but ruled that the election cannot proceed as scheduled because some votes would be cast using outmoded punch-card ballot machines.
The decision applies to all the recall questions on the ballot, as well as two propositions.
The court, the nation's largest and most liberal federal appeals court, withheld ordering the immediate implementation of its decision by a week to allow time for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Governor Gray Davis said he expected the case to go to a higher court.
Davis, speaking after appearing with former President Bill Clinton said: "This recall has been like a roller coaster. There are more surprises than you can possibly imagine."
He added that he would continue to make his case to the people that a recall is not good for the state.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/d08d43ca2127ed72e6bb0050a59f0bd7
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. Wide shot of Islamic militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir inside prison compound
2. Various shots of Bashir, supporters and media
3. SOUNDBITE (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"In our opinion, (this is) already, you know something like, against the law. We call it unlawful detention. So we will protest it."
4. Cameraman
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"Abu Bakar Bashir, of course, now demands his right to be released. Because he agrees with us that he is put in detention without any legal ground."
6. Bashir returning to his prison cell
7. SOUNDBITE: (Indonesian) Fauzan, Bashir supporter:
"He (Bashir) is being treated with incredible injustice by the law of this country. Today in the name of law, he must be released. But there might be outside forces which influence the law."
8. Wide shot of prison compound
STORYLINE
An Indonesian appeals court cleared militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir of treason and reduced his sentence from four years to three, court officials said on Monday.
The Jakarta High Court upheld Bashir's conviction on lesser charges of forging identity documents.
Bashir was convicted in September of treason for involvement in a plot to overthrow Indonesia's secular government, but cleared of charges of being the leader of the al-Qaida linked Southeast Asia terror group Jemaah Islamiyah.
Prosecutors had demanded he serve 15 years.
The decision was widely criticised by foreign governments who maintain that Bashir is the spiritual head of the group, which has been blamed for both last year's Bali bombings that killed 202 people and the August 5 bombing of the Marriott hotel in Jakarta that killed 12.
The ruling, which was made last month but only revealed on Monday, could re-ignite criticism that Indonesia is treating Bashir too leniently.
The 65-year-old cleric is the most visible proponent of Islamic militancy in the country, even though he has repeatedly denied any involvement in terrorism.
A senior court official speaking on condition of anonymity said on Monday that the court had thrown out the treason conviction because there was not enough evidence to support the charge.
A Bashir defence lawyer said his team was not satisfied with the ruling and wanted all charges dropped.
Both the defence and state prosecutors said they would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
Bashir was arrested shortly after the Bali attack amid intense pressure on Indonesia to crack down on extremism.
He was not charged with involvement in either the Bali or Marriott attacks.
Treason, though a capital offence in many countries, is not always punishable by death or long prison sentences in Indonesia.
Bashir fled to Malaysia in the 1980s to escape a crackdown on militants by former dictator Suharto.
He founded a religious boarding school in central Java that was attended by several militants convicted in the Bali blasts.
Bashir and his followers have long sought to establish an Islamic state in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country.
In recent jailhouse speeches, the cleric said he disapproves of recent terror attacks but "respects" those who carried them out.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/ad5180e46874fd0eed55b41107bf1ad2
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. Wide shot of Islamic militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir inside prison compound
2. Various shots of Bashir, supporters and media
3. SOUNDBITE (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"In our opinion, (this is) already, you know something like, against the law. We call it unlawful detention. So we will protest it."
4. Cameraman
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"Abu Bakar Bashir, of course, now demands his right to be released. Because he agrees with us that he is put in detention without any legal ground."
6. Bashir returning to his prison cell
7. SOUNDBITE: (Indonesian) Fauzan, Bashir supporter:
"He (Bashir) is being treated with incredible injustice by the law of this country. Today in the name of law, he must be released. But there might be outside forces which influence the law."
8. Wide shot of prison compound
STORYLINE
An Indonesian appeals court cleared militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir of treason and reduced his sentence from four years to three, court officials said on Monday.
The Jakarta High Court upheld Bashir's conviction on lesser charges of forging identity documents.
Bashir was convicted in September of treason for involvement in a plot to overthrow Indonesia's secular government, but cleared of charges of being the leader of the al-Qaida linked Southeast Asia terror group Jemaah Islamiyah.
Prosecutors had demanded he serve 15 years.
The decision was widely criticised by foreign governments who maintain that Bashir is the spiritual head of the group, which has been blamed for both last year's Bali bombings that killed 202 people and the August 5 bombing of the Marriott hotel in Jakarta that killed 12.
The ruling, which was made last month but only revealed on Monday, could re-ignite criticism that Indonesia is treating Bashir too leniently.
The 65-year-old cleric is the most visible proponent of Islamic militancy in the country, even though he has repeatedly denied any involvement in terrorism.
A senior court official speaking on condition of anonymity said on Monday that the court had thrown out the treason conviction because there was not enough evidence to support the charge.
A Bashir defence lawyer said his team was not satisfied with the ruling and wanted all charges dropped.
Both the defence and state prosecutors said they would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
Bashir was arrested shortly after the Bali attack amid intense pressure on Indonesia to crack down on extremism.
He was not charged with involvement in either the Bali or Marriott attacks.
Treason, though a capital offence in many countries, is not always punishable by death or long prison sentences in Indonesia.
Bashir fled to Malaysia in the 1980s to escape a crackdown on militants by former dictator Suharto.
He founded a religious boarding school in central Java that was attended by several militants convicted in the Bali blasts.
Bashir and his followers have long sought to establish an Islamic state in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country.
In recent jailhouse speeches, the cleric said he disapproves of recent terror attacks but "respects" those who carried them out.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/ad5180e46874fd0eed55b41107bf1ad2
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
NB: wrong slate on tape, story correct
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
1. Wide exterior of Indonesia's Supreme Court
2. Sign of the Court
3. Mid shot of Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto talking to journalists
4. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Toton Suprapto, Supreme Court judge:
"We have made a decision in this case to uphold the ruling of both District and High courts. The Supreme Court found no misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
5. Exterior pan of Supreme Court
6. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"We will immediately suggest to Amrozi to file for judicial review to the court because, at the moment, we are also complaining about the charges against our client to the Commission of the Constitution."
File - Bali, May 2003
7. Various of Amrozi bin Nurhasyim in court
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
8. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"According to case statistics at the Supreme Court, this case was decided very quickly, unlike other cases in court. There are special things we need to question here and finding why it is so."
File - Bali, May 2003
9.Various shots of Amrozi in court
STORYLINE:
Indonesia's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a militant sentenced to death for planning and carrying out the 2002 Bali bombings, a court spokesman said on Wednesday.
Amrozi bin Nurhasyim was the first of the 29 militants convicted in the attack to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The bombings killed 202 people, mostly foreign tourists.
Amrozi's lawyers said they had yet to be informed of the verdict, but would file a judicial review of the case with the Supreme Court - a process that could take months or years.
Amrozi, dubbed the smiling assassin after he joked with police about the October 12, 2002, blasts after his arrest, has never shown any remorse for the attack, which was blamed on the al-Qaida linked Jemaah Islamiyah terror group.
A spokesman for the Supreme Court said a three-judge panel threw out Amrozi's appeal, which was filed just over three months ago.
Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto said the pannel of judges didn't find any "misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
Amrozi was sentenced to death in August last year.
Two other militants, including Amrozi's older brother Ali Gufron, have also been sentenced to death for planning and carrying out the attack.
They have also filed appeals at the Supreme Court.
Twenty-six others have been sentenced to between three years to life in connection with the attack.
Most of them are also appealing through Indonesia's legal system.
In their appeal, Amrozi's lawyers had argued that he did not deserve the death sentence because he was a minor player in the attack.
They also questioned the legality of retroactively applying a new anti-terror law passed after the Bali attack.
A judicial review requires new evidence to be submitted before it is heard.
If the Supreme Court rejects the review, then Amrozi's final chance to avoid execution would be appealing directly to the president for clemency.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/802bfd11a56ba965226ed3e1f97e465d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
NB: wrong slate on tape, story correct
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
1. Wide exterior of Indonesia's Supreme Court
2. Sign of the Court
3. Mid shot of Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto talking to journalists
4. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Toton Suprapto, Supreme Court judge:
"We have made a decision in this case to uphold the ruling of both District and High courts. The Supreme Court found no misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
5. Exterior pan of Supreme Court
6. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"We will immediately suggest to Amrozi to file for judicial review to the court because, at the moment, we are also complaining about the charges against our client to the Commission of the Constitution."
File - Bali, May 2003
7. Various of Amrozi bin Nurhasyim in court
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
8. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"According to case statistics at the Supreme Court, this case was decided very quickly, unlike other cases in court. There are special things we need to question here and finding why it is so."
File - Bali, May 2003
9.Various shots of Amrozi in court
STORYLINE:
Indonesia's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a militant sentenced to death for planning and carrying out the 2002 Bali bombings, a court spokesman said on Wednesday.
Amrozi bin Nurhasyim was the first of the 29 militants convicted in the attack to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The bombings killed 202 people, mostly foreign tourists.
Amrozi's lawyers said they had yet to be informed of the verdict, but would file a judicial review of the case with the Supreme Court - a process that could take months or years.
Amrozi, dubbed the smiling assassin after he joked with police about the October 12, 2002, blasts after his arrest, has never shown any remorse for the attack, which was blamed on the al-Qaida linked Jemaah Islamiyah terror group.
A spokesman for the Supreme Court said a three-judge panel threw out Amrozi's appeal, which was filed just over three months ago.
Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto said the pannel of judges didn't find any "misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
Amrozi was sentenced to death in August last year.
Two other militants, including Amrozi's older brother Ali Gufron, have also been sentenced to death for planning and carrying out the attack.
They have also filed appeals at the Supreme Court.
Twenty-six others have been sentenced to between three years to life in connection with the attack.
Most of them are also appealing through Indonesia's legal system.
In their appeal, Amrozi's lawyers had argued that he did not deserve the death sentence because he was a minor player in the attack.
They also questioned the legality of retroactively applying a new anti-terror law passed after the Bali attack.
A judicial review requires new evidence to be submitted before it is heard.
If the Supreme Court rejects the review, then Amrozi's final chance to avoid execution would be appealing directly to the president for clemency.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/802bfd11a56ba965226ed3e1f97e465d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
Washington, DC - December 18, 2003
1. Various of ruling from federal appeals court in San Francisco
New York, New York - December 18, 2003
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very bad day for the (US) administration but it is a very good day for the (US) Constitution. Our federal courts are asserting their own authority to serve as independent checks on executive power, even during times of national security."
3. Close-up of court ruling
4. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very important ruling. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said that US courts do have jurisdiction to hear claims brought on behalf of those detained at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Approximately 660 individuals are detained there currently and the administration has been arguing that US courts do not have jurisdiction because Guantanamo Bay does not constitute sovereign US territory. But, under the terms of the perpetual lease signed by the United States and Cuba in 1903, the United States, although it does not have sovereignty, has complete jurisdiction and control under the terms of the lease. And the 9th Circuit says, under these conditions, that is sufficient and that US courts do have jurisdiction to hear the Guantanamo detainees' claims because, frankly, there are no other courts that could hear the claims, the U-S courts are their only recourse."
Guantanamo Bay - November 2003
5. Various of Camp Delta
STORYLINE:
A US federal appeals court ruled on Thursday for the first time that prisoners held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, should have access to lawyers and the American court system.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' two to one decision was a rebuke to the Bush administration, which maintains that because the 660 men held there were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charges or trial.
The US Supreme Court last month agreed to decide whether the detainees, picked up in Afghanistan and Pakistan, should have access to the courts.
The justices agreed to hear that case after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the prisoners had no rights to the American legal system.
The San Francisco appeals court, ruling on Thursday on a petition from a relative of a Libyan the U.S. military captured in Afghanistan, said the Bush administration's indefinite detention of the men runs contrary to American ideals.
A spokeswoman from the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Fiona Doherty, said although it was a bad day for the Bush administration it was a good day for the Constitution.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/bcaa482271805511b09aff8f15f3b33d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
Washington, DC - December 18, 2003
1. Various of ruling from federal appeals court in San Francisco
New York, New York - December 18, 2003
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very bad day for the (US) administration but it is a very good day for the (US) Constitution. Our federal courts are asserting their own authority to serve as independent checks on executive power, even during times of national security."
3. Close-up of court ruling
4. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very important ruling. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said that US courts do have jurisdiction to hear claims brought on behalf of those detained at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Approximately 660 individuals are detained there currently and the administration has been arguing that US courts do not have jurisdiction because Guantanamo Bay does not constitute sovereign US territory. But, under the terms of the perpetual lease signed by the United States and Cuba in 1903, the United States, although it does not have sovereignty, has complete jurisdiction and control under the terms of the lease. And the 9th Circuit says, under these conditions, that is sufficient and that US courts do have jurisdiction to hear the Guantanamo detainees' claims because, frankly, there are no other courts that could hear the claims, the U-S courts are their only recourse."
Guantanamo Bay - November 2003
5. Various of Camp Delta
STORYLINE:
A US federal appeals court ruled on Thursday for the first time that prisoners held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, should have access to lawyers and the American court system.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' two to one decision was a rebuke to the Bush administration, which maintains that because the 660 men held there were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charges or trial.
The US Supreme Court last month agreed to decide whether the detainees, picked up in Afghanistan and Pakistan, should have access to the courts.
The justices agreed to hear that case after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the prisoners had no rights to the American legal system.
The San Francisco appeals court, ruling on Thursday on a petition from a relative of a Libyan the U.S. military captured in Afghanistan, said the Bush administration's indefinite detention of the men runs contrary to American ideals.
A spokeswoman from the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Fiona Doherty, said although it was a bad day for the Bush administration it was a good day for the Constitution.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/bcaa482271805511b09aff8f15f3b33d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
1. Exterior court house where tribunal held
2. Journalists inside awaiting verdict
3. Close up sign "court of appeal"
4. Various of people walking up stairs towards courtroom
5. Close up policeman
6. People waiting outside courtroom
7. People coming out after ruling, pro-Battisti woman shouting her protest
8. SOUNDBITE: (French) Yves Cochet, French Green Party member of parliament:
"This judgement is of course absolutely iniquitous and we regret this decision. I think that France is selling itself short. It was, is and we hope it always will be a place of refuge and of human rights, and so it has to show it."
9. People leaving court
10. Various of pro-Battisti supporters outside the court, lying on ground as protest, chanting and singing songs, police standing by
11. Tilt up supporters to courthouse
STORYLINE:
A French court on Wednesday ruled in favour of extraditing an Italian leftist wanted for murder who escaped from prison in the 1980s to make a quiet new life as a writer in France.
It was not immediately clear whether Cesare Battisti plans to appeal to the Court of Cassation, France's highest appeals court.
He also has the option of appealing to the Council of State.
French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin has the final say on any extradition.
There were cries of protest inside the courtroom after the ruling was announced, although Battisti himself made no statement.
Left-wing sympathisers held a street protest outside the Palais de Justice, blocking traffic.
Heavily armed riot police stood by to maintain order.
Yves Cochet, a Paris lawmaker from the left-wing Greens party, said he intends to ask President Jacques Chirac to stop the extradition.
Battisti's case has become a cause celebre for liberal French intellectuals opposed to France's decision to end a two-decade asylum policy that kept him and other Italian leftist activists safe.
In May, a prosecutor recommended Battisti's extradition.
Battisti, a former member of the group Armed Proletarians for Communism, escaped from an Italian prison in 1981, fleeing to Mexico before settling in France in the early 1990s.
He was convicted in absentia and sentenced to life in prison in Italy in 1990 for two murders dating to 1978 and 1979, and he is accused of having a role as an accomplice in two other murders in 1979.
In France, Battisti wrote police thrillers and joined a community of dozens of Italians protected from extradition.
They considered themselves safe after the late Socialist President Francois Mitterrand vowed in 1985 to shelter Italian leftist militants who "embarked on a second phase of their lives (and) integrated themselves into French society."
Most of the fugitives fled Italy during the turbulent era in the 1970s and 1980s when militants on the left and right carried out killings and bombings aimed at bringing down the regime.
France was proud of its tradition as a haven for political refugees and disapproved of Italy's use of mass arrests and informants to combat extremists.
But after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the policy left France's government vulnerable to criticism that it wasn't doing enough to fight terrorism.
In 2002, Paolo Persichetti, a fugitive member of the terrorist group, was extradited to Italy to serve a 22-and-a-half year prison sentence for the 1987 death of an Italian general.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/918fe396e438853a20c0b63ea3bb2f1d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. Exterior court house where tribunal held
2. Journalists inside awaiting verdict
3. Close up sign "court of appeal"
4. Various of people walking up stairs towards courtroom
5. Close up policeman
6. People waiting outside courtroom
7. People coming out after ruling, pro-Battisti woman shouting her protest
8. SOUNDBITE: (French) Yves Cochet, French Green Party member of parliament:
"This judgement is of course absolutely iniquitous and we regret this decision. I think that France is selling itself short. It was, is and we hope it always will be a place of refuge and of human rights, and so it has to show it."
9. People leaving court
10. Various of pro-Battisti supporters outside the court, lying on ground as protest, chanting and singing songs, police standing by
11. Tilt up supporters to courthouse
STORYLINE:
A French court on Wednesday ruled in favour of extraditing an Italian leftist wanted for murder who escaped from prison in the 1980s to make a quiet new life as a writer in France.
It was not immediately clear whether Cesare Battisti plans to appeal to the Court of Cassation, France's highest appeals court.
He also has the option of appealing to the Council of State.
French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin has the final say on any extradition.
There were cries of protest inside the courtroom after the ruling was announced, although Battisti himself made no statement.
Left-wing sympathisers held a street protest outside the Palais de Justice, blocking traffic.
Heavily armed riot police stood by to maintain order.
Yves Cochet, a Paris lawmaker from the left-wing Greens party, said he intends to ask President Jacques Chirac to stop the extradition.
Battisti's case has become a cause celebre for liberal French intellectuals opposed to France's decision to end a two-decade asylum policy that kept him and other Italian leftist activists safe.
In May, a prosecutor recommended Battisti's extradition.
Battisti, a former member of the group Armed Proletarians for Communism, escaped from an Italian prison in 1981, fleeing to Mexico before settling in France in the early 1990s.
He was convicted in absentia and sentenced to life in prison in Italy in 1990 for two murders dating to 1978 and 1979, and he is accused of having a role as an accomplice in two other murders in 1979.
In France, Battisti wrote police thrillers and joined a community of dozens of Italians protected from extradition.
They considered themselves safe after the late Socialist President Francois Mitterrand vowed in 1985 to shelter Italian leftist militants who "embarked on a second phase of their lives (and) integrated themselves into French society."
Most of the fugitives fled Italy during the turbulent era in the 1970s and 1980s when militants on the left and right carried out killings and bombings aimed at bringing down the regime.
France was proud of its tradition as a haven for political refugees and disapproved of Italy's use of mass arrests and informants to combat extremists.
But after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the policy left France's government vulnerable to criticism that it wasn't doing enough to fight terrorism.
In 2002, Paolo Persichetti, a fugitive member of the terrorist group, was extradited to Italy to serve a 22-and-a-half year prison sentence for the 1987 death of an Italian general.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/918fe396e438853a20c0b63ea3bb2f1d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. Appellate Court door sign
2. Various FILE pictures of Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet
3. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Emilio Cheyre, Chilean Armed Forces Commander:
"The speculations about General Pinochet are hurtful. I know first hand of his worsening physical condition, of his suffering, of his notable lack of ability in many aspects."
4. FILE of Pinochet walking
5. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Pinochet's attorney:
"Going out for a walk or to a restaurant doesn't mean that you are capable of facing a judicial process. It is one thing to defend yourself in a court of law and another to go out on the street for a walk or to buy a book. It is absurd to link both things. In fact, Minister Ballestero says so after analysing the interview granted by Mr Pinochet. He says that he is indeed in a very bad situation."
6. FILE of Pinochet
7. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Eduardo Contreras, Prosecuting Attorney:
"Supposedly Augusto Pinochet is in no condition to remember anything, such as dates. He supposedly has no long term or short term memory. What is absurd is to think that someone can buy history books, speak to the attendant at the bookstore about dates, conduct commercial transactions. This is another insult to the the public and to the Supreme Court. Purchasing books is a provocation and we will incorporate this into our case."
8. FILE of Pinochet
9. House where Pinochet lives
STORYLINE:
Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet was fully aware of human rights abuses committed under his rule and did nothing to prevent them, according to the text of a Chilean court decision made public on Wednesday.
The May 28 ruling by the Santiago Court of Appeals was in favour of stripping Pinochet of his immunity from prosecution - something he enjoys as a former president.
Although the court's decision to strip Pinochet of his immunity was immediately made public on May 28, the full text of the decision wasn't released until Wednesday when the court said it believed Pinochet knew of repression under his rule.
Pinochet "knew perfectly well" what the security service was doing, "and was in a position to prevent the abuses, given its high authority," the ruling said.
The ruling increased the possibility that the 88-year-old former strongman will be tried for abuses during his 1973-90 reign.
The security service was commanded by General Manuel Contreras, a close associate of Pinochet.
Contreras, now retired, has served prison terms in various human rights cases, including the 1976 assassination in Washington of Orlando Letelier, a prominent Pinochet foe.
Pinochet's defence lawyers say they will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, which in the past has dropped charges against Pinochet because of his health.
According to a 2001 report by court-appointed doctors, Pinochet suffers from mild dementia and has sustained at least three mild strokes since 1998.
In addition, he suffers from diabetes and arthritis, and has been given a pacemaker.
The Supreme Court has ruled that Pinochet's health makes him unfit to stand trial.
The Santiago Court of Appeals voted 14-9 in favour of trying Pinochet for his role in the killing or disappearance of 19 Chilean dissidents in Argentina and Paraguay - part of the so-called Operation Condor which was a repression coordination plan implemented by the region's military dictatorships in the 1970s and 1980s.
The court ruling came after relatives of the victims sued Pinochet.
Lawyers said the ruling was prompted in part by Pinochet's appearance in a November 2003 interview with a Miami Spanish-language television station.
During the interview, he appeared healthy and lucid, although he was holding a cane and spoke with slurred words.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/c9c46ce591e2c5a0d1bb13879806d2c0
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. Appellate Court door sign
2. Various FILE pictures of Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet
3. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Emilio Cheyre, Chilean Armed Forces Commander:
"The speculations about General Pinochet are hurtful. I know first hand of his worsening physical condition, of his suffering, of his notable lack of ability in many aspects."
4. FILE of Pinochet walking
5. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Pinochet's attorney:
"Going out for a walk or to a restaurant doesn't mean that you are capable of facing a judicial process. It is one thing to defend yourself in a court of law and another to go out on the street for a walk or to buy a book. It is absurd to link both things. In fact, Minister Ballestero says so after analysing the interview granted by Mr Pinochet. He says that he is indeed in a very bad situation."
6. FILE of Pinochet
7. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Eduardo Contreras, Prosecuting Attorney:
"Supposedly Augusto Pinochet is in no condition to remember anything, such as dates. He supposedly has no long term or short term memory. What is absurd is to think that someone can buy history books, speak to the attendant at the bookstore about dates, conduct commercial transactions. This is another insult to the the public and to the Supreme Court. Purchasing books is a provocation and we will incorporate this into our case."
8. FILE of Pinochet
9. House where Pinochet lives
STORYLINE:
Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet was fully aware of human rights abuses committed under his rule and did nothing to prevent them, according to the text of a Chilean court decision made public on Wednesday.
The May 28 ruling by the Santiago Court of Appeals was in favour of stripping Pinochet of his immunity from prosecution - something he enjoys as a former president.
Although the court's decision to strip Pinochet of his immunity was immediately made public on May 28, the full text of the decision wasn't released until Wednesday when the court said it believed Pinochet knew of repression under his rule.
Pinochet "knew perfectly well" what the security service was doing, "and was in a position to prevent the abuses, given its high authority," the ruling said.
The ruling increased the possibility that the 88-year-old former strongman will be tried for abuses during his 1973-90 reign.
The security service was commanded by General Manuel Contreras, a close associate of Pinochet.
Contreras, now retired, has served prison terms in various human rights cases, including the 1976 assassination in Washington of Orlando Letelier, a prominent Pinochet foe.
Pinochet's defence lawyers say they will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, which in the past has dropped charges against Pinochet because of his health.
According to a 2001 report by court-appointed doctors, Pinochet suffers from mild dementia and has sustained at least three mild strokes since 1998.
In addition, he suffers from diabetes and arthritis, and has been given a pacemaker.
The Supreme Court has ruled that Pinochet's health makes him unfit to stand trial.
The Santiago Court of Appeals voted 14-9 in favour of trying Pinochet for his role in the killing or disappearance of 19 Chilean dissidents in Argentina and Paraguay - part of the so-called Operation Condor which was a repression coordination plan implemented by the region's military dictatorships in the 1970s and 1980s.
The court ruling came after relatives of the victims sued Pinochet.
Lawyers said the ruling was prompted in part by Pinochet's appearance in a November 2003 interview with a Miami Spanish-language television station.
During the interview, he appeared healthy and lucid, although he was holding a cane and spoke with slurred words.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/c9c46ce591e2c5a0d1bb13879806d2c0
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
1. Exterior Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General, Court of Arbitration for Sport CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition, so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has been upheld by CAS, so it has decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury should be reinstated as well."
3. SOUNDBITE: (French) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has committee has been upheld by CAS, so it means decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury on the 18th of August should be reinstated as well."
4. Set up of presser
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Will Connell, Equestrian Team Manager, Great Britain
"It was the right decision. It's perhaps a shame that we had to go to CAS. It wasn't about winning medals through the back door, it was about doing the best for our athletes, about the integrity of sport, about fair play. And I think our equestrian world is a very close community. The athletes have a lot of sympathy for Bettina, but at the end of the day she made a very silly mistake that all the riders are told very early on in their career not to make, and at the Olympic games the sport must be run within the rules and that is a great shame for the German team, but I believe very strongly that the British team deserved silver and Lesley, who has so often been the bridesmaid, deserved that fabulous gold medal, and Pipper the bronze."
6. Wide shot of presser
STORYLINE:
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) at the Athens Olympics has ruled in favour of France, Great Britain and the United States against an earlier decision that gave victory to Germany in the three-day equestrian team event.
The ruling on Saturday means Germany drops to fourth while France captures gold, Britain gets silver and the United States takes the bronze.
Initially, the judges gave Germany the gold and France the silver, while Britain took bronze.
But the same officials, concerned that Germany's Bettina Hoy might have crossed the start line twice on the show-jumping course, then docked Germany 14 points, dropping it from first place to fourth with 147.8 points in a decision that lifted the United States to third.
Germany then lodged a protest and an equestrian appeals committee reversed the judges' decision and the Germans reclaimed their gold. Again, France was awarded the silver and Britain the bronze, with the United States left empty-handed.
The appeal submitted by the three countries to CAS challenged whether the equestrian appeal committee had the jurisdiction to overturn the judges' decision.
The CAS panel sits on the second floor of the downtown Holiday Inn, where arbitrators are on call 24 hours a day to conduct hearings to settle disputes that will determine Olympic history.
CAS, an independent body, has set up shop in Athens to deal with doping, eligibility and other appeals on short notice to keep the games from getting bogged down in protests.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/0557fcc685c00146b5eabf5b2c27cca5
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. Exterior Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General, Court of Arbitration for Sport CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition, so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has been upheld by CAS, so it has decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury should be reinstated as well."
3. SOUNDBITE: (French) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has committee has been upheld by CAS, so it means decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury on the 18th of August should be reinstated as well."
4. Set up of presser
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Will Connell, Equestrian Team Manager, Great Britain
"It was the right decision. It's perhaps a shame that we had to go to CAS. It wasn't about winning medals through the back door, it was about doing the best for our athletes, about the integrity of sport, about fair play. And I think our equestrian world is a very close community. The athletes have a lot of sympathy for Bettina, but at the end of the day she made a very silly mistake that all the riders are told very early on in their career not to make, and at the Olympic games the sport must be run within the rules and that is a great shame for the German team, but I believe very strongly that the British team deserved silver and Lesley, who has so often been the bridesmaid, deserved that fabulous gold medal, and Pipper the bronze."
6. Wide shot of presser
STORYLINE:
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) at the Athens Olympics has ruled in favour of France, Great Britain and the United States against an earlier decision that gave victory to Germany in the three-day equestrian team event.
The ruling on Saturday means Germany drops to fourth while France captures gold, Britain gets silver and the United States takes the bronze.
Initially, the judges gave Germany the gold and France the silver, while Britain took bronze.
But the same officials, concerned that Germany's Bettina Hoy might have crossed the start line twice on the show-jumping course, then docked Germany 14 points, dropping it from first place to fourth with 147.8 points in a decision that lifted the United States to third.
Germany then lodged a protest and an equestrian appeals committee reversed the judges' decision and the Germans reclaimed their gold. Again, France was awarded the silver and Britain the bronze, with the United States left empty-handed.
The appeal submitted by the three countries to CAS challenged whether the equestrian appeal committee had the jurisdiction to overturn the judges' decision.
The CAS panel sits on the second floor of the downtown Holiday Inn, where arbitrators are on call 24 hours a day to conduct hearings to settle disputes that will determine Olympic history.
CAS, an independent body, has set up shop in Athens to deal with doping, eligibility and other appeals on short notice to keep the games from getting bogged down in protests.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/0557fcc685c00146b5eabf5b2c27cca5
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
SHOTLIST
1. Various exteriors of Court of Appeal
2. Police outside the court
3. Media pack surrounding one of the defendants
4. Defendant arriving
5. Various of lawyers and defendants arriving
6. Various of Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arriving in a car
7. Juppe getting out of car
8. Cameras, pan to Juppe's lawyer Jean-Rene Farthouat (on the left) standing outside the court
9. Juppe leaving court and getting into a car
10. Car driving away
11. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Rene Farthouat, former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe's lawyer:
"Listen, he (Juppe) kept his promise to explain himself as well as he could. He said a number of things. You heard them, like I did, in the courtroom and you can draw a certain number of conclusions from it. It's clear. (Reporter question: He admits he wasn't vigilant enough?). He admits he wasn't vigilant enough (Reporter question: And that he was aware of it?) That's not at all what he said."
12. Car driving away
13. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Pierre Mignard, lawyer for the city of Paris:
(Reporter question: What was the difference with Juppe's behaviour in the previous trial?)
"Perhaps in fact emphasising a lack of attention, lack of vigilance, perhaps but I think that's not enough. (Reporter question: What else is needed?) To admit to it. I think that when you were the prime minister of the French Republic, serving the Republic, then you should admit. That is grandeur. I think the country would appreciate it. (Reporter question: Anything else he should do?) I have nothing else to say."
14. Exterior of court building
STORYLINE
Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arrived at an appeals court in Versailles on Wednesday to fight a conviction that could end his political career.
Juppe, once seen as a potential successor to French President Jacques Chirac, admitted to the court to "errors, even faults" but said he did not intend to break the law.
He added that he had been "deeply shaken" by his January conviction for his role in a political financing scandal.
The 59-year-old hopes to overturn a suspended 18-month prison sentence that carried an additional 10-year ban from elected office.
His appeal hearing is expected to last at least until October 29.
Juppe was convicted for an illegal party funding scheme while he served as finance director at Paris City Hall during Chirac's tenure as mayor, from 1977 to 1995.
The verdict was an embarrassment to Chirac and, in shattering Juppe's political future, appeared to rob the president of a close ally who was widely seen as his favourite to succeed him.
The next elections are in 2007, and Chirac has not said if he will seek a third term.
Should Chirac leave office or be voted out, he would lose the presidential immunity which has protected him from questioning in this financing scandal and others.
In convicting Juppe, judges sanctioned a system of political financing in place under Chirac's watch at Paris City Hall.
City funds were used to pay personnel of Chirac's Rally for the Republic party, the UMP's predecessor. Bogus city jobs were created to hide the source of funding.
Juppe said the fake jobs system was commonly used by political parties and unions for 20 years.
Juppe was by far the most prominent of six defendants who went before the court in Versailles, west of Paris, on appeal.
Chirac has given fervent backing to Juppe since the conviction.
Their relationship dates to the 1970s, when Chirac contracted Juppe as his speechwriter. Juppe served as Chirac's first prime minister from 1995-1997.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/37591d5e86551952b2365bc1f4205bdf
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
1. Various exteriors of Court of Appeal
2. Police outside the court
3. Media pack surrounding one of the defendants
4. Defendant arriving
5. Various of lawyers and defendants arriving
6. Various of Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arriving in a car
7. Juppe getting out of car
8. Cameras, pan to Juppe's lawyer Jean-Rene Farthouat (on the left) standing outside the court
9. Juppe leaving court and getting into a car
10. Car driving away
11. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Rene Farthouat, former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe's lawyer:
"Listen, he (Juppe) kept his promise to explain himself as well as he could. He said a number of things. You heard them, like I did, in the courtroom and you can draw a certain number of conclusions from it. It's clear. (Reporter question: He admits he wasn't vigilant enough?). He admits he wasn't vigilant enough (Reporter question: And that he was aware of it?) That's not at all what he said."
12. Car driving away
13. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Pierre Mignard, lawyer for the city of Paris:
(Reporter question: What was the difference with Juppe's behaviour in the previous trial?)
"Perhaps in fact emphasising a lack of attention, lack of vigilance, perhaps but I think that's not enough. (Reporter question: What else is needed?) To admit to it. I think that when you were the prime minister of the French Republic, serving the Republic, then you should admit. That is grandeur. I think the country would appreciate it. (Reporter question: Anything else he should do?) I have nothing else to say."
14. Exterior of court building
STORYLINE
Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arrived at an appeals court in Versailles on Wednesday to fight a conviction that could end his political career.
Juppe, once seen as a potential successor to French President Jacques Chirac, admitted to the court to "errors, even faults" but said he did not intend to break the law.
He added that he had been "deeply shaken" by his January conviction for his role in a political financing scandal.
The 59-year-old hopes to overturn a suspended 18-month prison sentence that carried an additional 10-year ban from elected office.
His appeal hearing is expected to last at least until October 29.
Juppe was convicted for an illegal party funding scheme while he served as finance director at Paris City Hall during Chirac's tenure as mayor, from 1977 to 1995.
The verdict was an embarrassment to Chirac and, in shattering Juppe's political future, appeared to rob the president of a close ally who was widely seen as his favourite to succeed him.
The next elections are in 2007, and Chirac has not said if he will seek a third term.
Should Chirac leave office or be voted out, he would lose the presidential immunity which has protected him from questioning in this financing scandal and others.
In convicting Juppe, judges sanctioned a system of political financing in place under Chirac's watch at Paris City Hall.
City funds were used to pay personnel of Chirac's Rally for the Republic party, the UMP's predecessor. Bogus city jobs were created to hide the source of funding.
Juppe said the fake jobs system was commonly used by political parties and unions for 20 years.
Juppe was by far the most prominent of six defendants who went before the court in Versailles, west of Paris, on appeal.
Chirac has given fervent backing to Juppe since the conviction.
Their relationship dates to the 1970s, when Chirac contracted Juppe as his speechwriter. Juppe served as Chirac's first prime minister from 1995-1997.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/37591d5e86551952b2365bc1f4205bdf
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
IP and Advocacy by Judge Alex Kozinski, former Chief Judge of the United States, Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Chaired by: The Rt Hon Professor Sir Robin Jacob, Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law, UCL Laws
About the speaker and the lecture
Judge Alex Kozinski was appointed to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in 1985 and was its Chief Judge from 2007 until 2014. He heard many IP cases (other than patents), the 9th Circuit including within it Hollywood and other creative centres.
In this lecture, Judge Kozinski talks about the challenge that IP cases present to judges. He speaks of its growing importance and explains why advocacy is so important in this field and how it can make a big difference. The talk explores several intellectual property cases to illustrate some lessons in effective advocacy. In particular, these cases illustrate the power of concrete examples – in particular, concrete images and sounds – which often persuade in a way that abstract legal arguments do not. The power of concrete examples is not limited to the courtroom. They can also be used to persuade the court of public opinion, where the stakes as regards IP are often higher.
At the end of this talk, students will have gained a profound insight into the importance of advocacy in IP cases and how to use concrete examples when they themselves are acting as advocates. They will also gain an insight into how an acute judicial mind assesses legal submissions.
Find out more about this lecture on our website at http://www.laws.ucl.ac.uk/event/ip-and-advocacy/
IP and Advocacy by Judge Alex Kozinski, former Chief Judge of the United States, Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Chaired by: The Rt Hon Professor Sir Robin Jacob, Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law, UCL Laws
About the speaker and the lecture
Judge Alex Kozinski was appointed to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in 1985 and was its Chief Judge from 2007 until 2014. He heard many IP cases (other than patents), the 9th Circuit including within it Hollywood and other creative centres.
In this lecture, Judge Kozinski talks about the challenge that IP cases present to judges. He speaks of its growing importance and explains why advocacy is so important in this field and how it can make a big difference. The talk explores several intellectual property cases to illustrate some lessons in effective advocacy. In particular, these cases illustrate the power of concrete examples – in particular, concrete images and sounds – which often persuade in a way that abstract legal arguments do not. The power of concrete examples is not limited to the courtroom. They can also be used to persuade the court of public opinion, where the stakes as regards IP are often higher.
At the end of this talk, students will have gained a profound insight into the importance of advocacy in IP cases and how to use concrete examples when they themselves are acting as advocates. They will also gain an insight into how an acute judicial mind assesses legal submissions.
Find out more about this lecture on our website at http://www.laws.ucl.ac.uk/event/ip-and-advocacy/
1. National Security Appeals Court exterior
2. Various of Americans walking into court
3. Various of guards standing outside court
4. White van drives by with Americans inside
5. SOUNDBITE: (Pashtu) Mohammed Ismail Habed, Head of Appeals Court:
"We met the American prisoners today. It was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence."
6. Pen, eyeglasses and paper on table
STORYLINE:
Three Americans sentenced to eight to 10 years in jail for torturing Afghans on a freelance hunt for terror suspects began their appeal on Monday, despite the absence of their US lawyers.
Jonathan Idema, Brent Bennett and Edward Caraballo are seeking to overturn their convictions in a trial that embarrassed US and NATO forces and sowed confusion about America's role in Afghanistan.
Police brought the three in handcuffs to the office of Presiding Judge Mohammed Ismail Habed in downtown Kabul for a preliminary hearing, which was closed to the public.
Habed later told journalists: "it was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence".
Four Afghans were also convicted as accomplices.
Habed had postponed the hearing for more than three weeks to allow time for the defendants' American lawyers to arrive in Kabul.
The hearing was supposed to set a date for the first full court session.
But Abdul Latif, one of a three-judge panel handling the case, said the absence of the defence team meant they could set no date for the first full
court session.
Idema, the group's leader, Bennett, his right-hand man, and television cameraman Caraballo were arrested in July when Afghan security forces raided a house in downtown Kabul and discovered eight Afghans who said they had been abused.
On September 15, a lower court convicted all three of running an illegal jail, torture and illegal entry into Afghanistan, after a trial marred by faulty translation and chaotic procedures.
Idema, a 48-year-old former soldier from Fayetteville, North Carolina, insists they were tracking down terror suspects, including al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, in close cooperation with American and Afghan security forces.
The US military acknowledges accepting a prisoner from Idema, but insists it realised shortly afterward that he was an impostor.
NATO peacekeepers also helped the accused on three raids, but said they later they had been duped.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/aa60669aa98b18028c602eb8498e0372
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. National Security Appeals Court exterior
2. Various of Americans walking into court
3. Various of guards standing outside court
4. White van drives by with Americans inside
5. SOUNDBITE: (Pashtu) Mohammed Ismail Habed, Head of Appeals Court:
"We met the American prisoners today. It was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence."
6. Pen, eyeglasses and paper on table
STORYLINE:
Three Americans sentenced to eight to 10 years in jail for torturing Afghans on a freelance hunt for terror suspects began their appeal on Monday, despite the absence of their US lawyers.
Jonathan Idema, Brent Bennett and Edward Caraballo are seeking to overturn their convictions in a trial that embarrassed US and NATO forces and sowed confusion about America's role in Afghanistan.
Police brought the three in handcuffs to the office of Presiding Judge Mohammed Ismail Habed in downtown Kabul for a preliminary hearing, which was closed to the public.
Habed later told journalists: "it was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence".
Four Afghans were also convicted as accomplices.
Habed had postponed the hearing for more than three weeks to allow time for the defendants' American lawyers to arrive in Kabul.
The hearing was supposed to set a date for the first full court session.
But Abdul Latif, one of a three-judge panel handling the case, said the absence of the defence team meant they could set no date for the first full
court session.
Idema, the group's leader, Bennett, his right-hand man, and television cameraman Caraballo were arrested in July when Afghan security forces raided a house in downtown Kabul and discovered eight Afghans who said they had been abused.
On September 15, a lower court convicted all three of running an illegal jail, torture and illegal entry into Afghanistan, after a trial marred by faulty translation and chaotic procedures.
Idema, a 48-year-old former soldier from Fayetteville, North Carolina, insists they were tracking down terror suspects, including al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, in close cooperation with American and Afghan security forces.
The US military acknowledges accepting a prisoner from Idema, but insists it realised shortly afterward that he was an impostor.
NATO peacekeepers also helped the accused on three raids, but said they later they had been duped.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/aa60669aa98b18028c602eb8498e0372
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Court cuts sentences in killing of Catholic bishop
SHOTLIST
Guatemala City - June 8, 2001
1. Accused entering courtroom
2. Close up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
3. Close up Reverend Mario Orantes
4. Close up retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada
5. Wide of accused
6. Close up Margarita Lopez (Gerardi's cook)
7. Close up Obdulio Villanueva
8. Wide of courtroom
9. Wide of accused
10. Close up retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada
11. Close up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
12. Close up Obdulio Villanueva
13. Close up Priest Mario Orantes
14. Tilt up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
15. Wide of courtroom, judges reading sentence
STORYLINE
A Guatemala appeals court on Tuesday reduced prison sentences by 10 years against two former soldiers in the 1998 killing of a human rights crusading Roman Catholic bishop.
In June 2001, a three-judge panel convicted retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada and his son, Captain Byron Lima Oliva, in the killing of Juan Gerardi, who was bludgeoned to death with a concrete block in the garage of his Guatemala City seminary in April 1998.
Lima Estrada and Lima Oliva were assigned co-responsibility in the killing and sentenced to 30 years behind bars, but lawyers successfully argued on appeal that more than one person cannot be convicted of a killing according to Guatemalan law.
Reclassified on Tuesday as "accomplices" in the slaying, the two men received revised sentences of 20 years each from a three-judge panel.
Prosecutors can appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, Guatemala's second-highest tribunal.
Also on Tuesday, the judges upheld a 20-year sentence against Reverend Mario Orantes, Gerardi's assistant.
The bishop's death came two days after he presented a Catholic Church human rights office report blaming the military for the overwhelming majority of atrocities committed during Guatemala's 1960-1996 civil war, which killed 200,000.
Sergeant Mario Obdulio Villanueva also had been convicted as having co-responsibility in Gerardi's slaying and was sentenced to 30 years.
He was killed, however, when fights between inmates broke out during a prison riot in 2002.
Orantes' lawyer said with consideration for good conduct the men could be released within four years, having already served six years.
The appeal had sought to free all three men or provide them new trials.
Lima Oliva protested the revised sentence, arguing before reporters on Tuesday that his prosecution was motivated by politics.
The same court of appeals threw out the convictions and ordered new trials for the four men two years ago, but the Supreme Court upheld the original rulings.
That decision was later endorsed by the Court of Constitutionality, Guatemala's highest court.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/721852052b798776e14a7a784ad47a22
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
Guatemala City - June 8, 2001
1. Accused entering courtroom
2. Close up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
3. Close up Reverend Mario Orantes
4. Close up retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada
5. Wide of accused
6. Close up Margarita Lopez (Gerardi's cook)
7. Close up Obdulio Villanueva
8. Wide of courtroom
9. Wide of accused
10. Close up retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada
11. Close up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
12. Close up Obdulio Villanueva
13. Close up Priest Mario Orantes
14. Tilt up Captain Byron Lima Oliva
15. Wide of courtroom, judges reading sentence
STORYLINE
A Guatemala appeals court on Tuesday reduced prison sentences by 10 years against two former soldiers in the 1998 killing of a human rights crusading Roman Catholic bishop.
In June 2001, a three-judge panel convicted retired Colonel Byron Lima Estrada and his son, Captain Byron Lima Oliva, in the killing of Juan Gerardi, who was bludgeoned to death with a concrete block in the garage of his Guatemala City seminary in April 1998.
Lima Estrada and Lima Oliva were assigned co-responsibility in the killing and sentenced to 30 years behind bars, but lawyers successfully argued on appeal that more than one person cannot be convicted of a killing according to Guatemalan law.
Reclassified on Tuesday as "accomplices" in the slaying, the two men received revised sentences of 20 years each from a three-judge panel.
Prosecutors can appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, Guatemala's second-highest tribunal.
Also on Tuesday, the judges upheld a 20-year sentence against Reverend Mario Orantes, Gerardi's assistant.
The bishop's death came two days after he presented a Catholic Church human rights office report blaming the military for the overwhelming majority of atrocities committed during Guatemala's 1960-1996 civil war, which killed 200,000.
Sergeant Mario Obdulio Villanueva also had been convicted as having co-responsibility in Gerardi's slaying and was sentenced to 30 years.
He was killed, however, when fights between inmates broke out during a prison riot in 2002.
Orantes' lawyer said with consideration for good conduct the men could be released within four years, having already served six years.
The appeal had sought to free all three men or provide them new trials.
Lima Oliva protested the revised sentence, arguing before reporters on Tuesday that his prosecution was motivated by politics.
The same court of appeals threw out the convictions and ordered new trials for the four men two years ago, but the Supreme Court upheld the original rulings.
That decision was later endorsed by the Court of Constitutionality, Guatemala's highest court.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/721852052b798776e14a7a784ad47a22
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Court refuses to strip Pinochet of immunity to allow trial
Santiago - 24 March 2005
1. Wide of Supreme Court justices
2. Close up of justice
3. Augusto Pinochet's defence attorney Pablo Rodriguez before court
4. Human rights lawyer before court
5. Pan of Carlos Prats' relatives and lawyers at hearing
6. Close up Rodriguez
7. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Augusto Pinochet's defence attorney:
"I am extremely satisfied with this ruling because it means there is no basis for trying General Pinochet for something so horrible and terrifying as was found out in the original investigation in Argentina and later in Chile."
8. Pan of court
9. Various of audience at hearing
11. Exterior court entrance
12. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Pamela Pereira, Prats family lawyer:
"The first thing we want to say is that this ruling definitely guarantees the impunity of General Pinochet with respect to the General Carlos Prats crime, despite the previous court ruling and the investigation that have linked him to this crime."
File - 1974
Buenos Aires/Santiago
13. Various of Chilean General Carlos Prats and his car after being bombed
Santiago - 24 March 2005
14. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Angelica Prats, Carlos Prats' daughter:
"For us it's frankly lamentable what the Supreme Court has ruled, because it leaves Pinochet, as Pamela said, with impunity in this case, when his responsibility is certain."
File - February 2004
Santiago
15. Pinochet walking into church with bodyguards
STORYLINE
Chile's Supreme Court on Thursday, refused to strip former dictator General Augusto Pinochet of his immunity from prosecution for the assassination of his predecessor as commander of the Chilean army.
The Supreme Court's 15-4 vote reverses a ruling by a lower court that had agreed to strip the 89-year-old former ruler of the immunity he enjoys as former president.
However, Pinochet faces trial in other cases related to alleged human rights abuses, as his immunity can only be applied or stripped in each individual case.
In announcing its decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court did not immediately publish the text of its ruling, which is believed to be based mainly on Pinochet's deteriorating health.
The decision reverses a ruling on 2 December by the Santiago Court of Appeals.
The Santiago appeals court had voted 14-9 to strip Pinochet of immunity at the request of Judge Alejandro Solis, who is investigating the 1974 assassination in Buenos Aires, Argentina of General Carlos Prats, Pinochet's predecessor as army commander.
Prats had opposed the coup on September 11, 1973 that ushered Pinochet to power for 17 years.
Prats and his wife Sophia Cuthbert, who had sought asylum in Argentina, were killed when a bomb blew up their car as they arrived home.
Thursday's decision brought no end Pinochet's legal troubles, though, as he is currently being tried in the case known as Operation Condor, a joint plan developed by the South American military dictatorships of the 1970s to eliminate dissidents.
In addition, another judge is investigating the disclosure that he kept secret multi-million US dollar accounts at banks in the United States.
Pinochet also faces more than 200 criminal suits stemming from the massive human rights abuses during his 1973-90 dictatorship, and while on some occasions the courts have pronounced him unfit to stand trial on health grounds, he has been tried and held under house arrest twice.
One trial was finally dropped, because of his health, and one is still developing.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/25a9ef87d33310764dab1f16cccf7886
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
Santiago - 24 March 2005
1. Wide of Supreme Court justices
2. Close up of justice
3. Augusto Pinochet's defence attorney Pablo Rodriguez before court
4. Human rights lawyer before court
5. Pan of Carlos Prats' relatives and lawyers at hearing
6. Close up Rodriguez
7. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Augusto Pinochet's defence attorney:
"I am extremely satisfied with this ruling because it means there is no basis for trying General Pinochet for something so horrible and terrifying as was found out in the original investigation in Argentina and later in Chile."
8. Pan of court
9. Various of audience at hearing
11. Exterior court entrance
12. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Pamela Pereira, Prats family lawyer:
"The first thing we want to say is that this ruling definitely guarantees the impunity of General Pinochet with respect to the General Carlos Prats crime, despite the previous court ruling and the investigation that have linked him to this crime."
File - 1974
Buenos Aires/Santiago
13. Various of Chilean General Carlos Prats and his car after being bombed
Santiago - 24 March 2005
14. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Angelica Prats, Carlos Prats' daughter:
"For us it's frankly lamentable what the Supreme Court has ruled, because it leaves Pinochet, as Pamela said, with impunity in this case, when his responsibility is certain."
File - February 2004
Santiago
15. Pinochet walking into church with bodyguards
STORYLINE
Chile's Supreme Court on Thursday, refused to strip former dictator General Augusto Pinochet of his immunity from prosecution for the assassination of his predecessor as commander of the Chilean army.
The Supreme Court's 15-4 vote reverses a ruling by a lower court that had agreed to strip the 89-year-old former ruler of the immunity he enjoys as former president.
However, Pinochet faces trial in other cases related to alleged human rights abuses, as his immunity can only be applied or stripped in each individual case.
In announcing its decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court did not immediately publish the text of its ruling, which is believed to be based mainly on Pinochet's deteriorating health.
The decision reverses a ruling on 2 December by the Santiago Court of Appeals.
The Santiago appeals court had voted 14-9 to strip Pinochet of immunity at the request of Judge Alejandro Solis, who is investigating the 1974 assassination in Buenos Aires, Argentina of General Carlos Prats, Pinochet's predecessor as army commander.
Prats had opposed the coup on September 11, 1973 that ushered Pinochet to power for 17 years.
Prats and his wife Sophia Cuthbert, who had sought asylum in Argentina, were killed when a bomb blew up their car as they arrived home.
Thursday's decision brought no end Pinochet's legal troubles, though, as he is currently being tried in the case known as Operation Condor, a joint plan developed by the South American military dictatorships of the 1970s to eliminate dissidents.
In addition, another judge is investigating the disclosure that he kept secret multi-million US dollar accounts at banks in the United States.
Pinochet also faces more than 200 criminal suits stemming from the massive human rights abuses during his 1973-90 dictatorship, and while on some occasions the courts have pronounced him unfit to stand trial on health grounds, he has been tried and held under house arrest twice.
One trial was finally dropped, because of his health, and one is still developing.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/25a9ef87d33310764dab1f16cccf7886
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Bush chooses conservative appeal judge John Roberts Jr. for Supreme Court
1. US President George W. Bush and judge John G. Roberts enter the press conference room
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"Good evening. One of the most consequential decisions a president makes is his appointment of a Justice to the Supreme Court. When a president chooses a Justice, he is placing in human hands the authority and majesty of the Law. The decisions of the Supreme Court affect the lives of every American, and so a nominee to that court must be a person of superb credentials and the highest integrity. A person who would faithfully apply the constitution and keep our founding promise of equal justice under law. I have found such a person in judge John Roberts."
3. Cutaway
4. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"My decision to nominate Judge John Roberts to the Supreme Court came after a thorough and deliberative process. My staff and I consulted with seventy members of the United States Senate. I received good advice from both Republicans and Democrats. I appreciate the care they took. I am grateful for their advice. I reviewed the credentials of many well qualified men and women. I met personally with a number of potential nominees. In my meetings with John Roberts I got deeply impressed. He is a man of extraordinary accomplishment and ability. He has a good heart. He has the qualities Americans expect in a judge. Experience, wisdom, fairness and civility."
5. Cutaway
6. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"Judge Roberts thank you for agreeing to serve and congratulations.
7. SOUNDBITE: (English) Judge John Robert, Nominee for Supreme Court
"It is both an honour and humbling to be nominate to serve on the Supreme Court. Before I became a judge, my law practice consisted largely of arguing cases before the Court. That experience left me with a profound appreciation for the role of the Court in our constitutional democracy and a deep regard for the Court as an institution. I've always got a lump in my throat whenever I walk up those marble steps to argue a case before the Court, and I don't think it was just from the nerves. I am very grateful for the confidence the president has shown in nominating me and I look forward in the next step in the process before the United States Senate."
8. Bush and Roberts shaking hands and leaving the press conference
STORYLINE:
President George W. Bush has chosen federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts as his first nominee for the Supreme Court, a rock-solid conservative who has won broad support from both parties but still could face a contentious battle over the direction of the nation's highest
court.
He announced his choice in a nationally broadcast speech to the nation.
Bush said his decision came after a thorough and deliberative process, "My staff and I consulted with seventy members of the United States Senate. I received good advice from both Republicans and Democrats. I appreciate the care they took. I am grateful for their advice. I reviewed the credentials of many well qualified men and women. I met personally with a number of potential nominees," he added.
Talking of Roberts, Bush said, "he is a man of extraordinary accomplishment and ability. He has a good heart. He has the qualities Americans expect in a judge. Experience, wisdom, fairness and civility."
The selection was something of a surprise.
Many expected that he would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the nine-member court with a woman or a member of an ethnic minority.
Roberts has been on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, nominated by Bush, since June 2003.
presidency.
Justices serve until they retire or die.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9bc181b09d54dde0db2805ddbf1d73db
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
1. US President George W. Bush and judge John G. Roberts enter the press conference room
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"Good evening. One of the most consequential decisions a president makes is his appointment of a Justice to the Supreme Court. When a president chooses a Justice, he is placing in human hands the authority and majesty of the Law. The decisions of the Supreme Court affect the lives of every American, and so a nominee to that court must be a person of superb credentials and the highest integrity. A person who would faithfully apply the constitution and keep our founding promise of equal justice under law. I have found such a person in judge John Roberts."
3. Cutaway
4. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"My decision to nominate Judge John Roberts to the Supreme Court came after a thorough and deliberative process. My staff and I consulted with seventy members of the United States Senate. I received good advice from both Republicans and Democrats. I appreciate the care they took. I am grateful for their advice. I reviewed the credentials of many well qualified men and women. I met personally with a number of potential nominees. In my meetings with John Roberts I got deeply impressed. He is a man of extraordinary accomplishment and ability. He has a good heart. He has the qualities Americans expect in a judge. Experience, wisdom, fairness and civility."
5. Cutaway
6. SOUNDBITE: (English) George W. Bush, US President:
"Judge Roberts thank you for agreeing to serve and congratulations.
7. SOUNDBITE: (English) Judge John Robert, Nominee for Supreme Court
"It is both an honour and humbling to be nominate to serve on the Supreme Court. Before I became a judge, my law practice consisted largely of arguing cases before the Court. That experience left me with a profound appreciation for the role of the Court in our constitutional democracy and a deep regard for the Court as an institution. I've always got a lump in my throat whenever I walk up those marble steps to argue a case before the Court, and I don't think it was just from the nerves. I am very grateful for the confidence the president has shown in nominating me and I look forward in the next step in the process before the United States Senate."
8. Bush and Roberts shaking hands and leaving the press conference
STORYLINE:
President George W. Bush has chosen federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts as his first nominee for the Supreme Court, a rock-solid conservative who has won broad support from both parties but still could face a contentious battle over the direction of the nation's highest
court.
He announced his choice in a nationally broadcast speech to the nation.
Bush said his decision came after a thorough and deliberative process, "My staff and I consulted with seventy members of the United States Senate. I received good advice from both Republicans and Democrats. I appreciate the care they took. I am grateful for their advice. I reviewed the credentials of many well qualified men and women. I met personally with a number of potential nominees," he added.
Talking of Roberts, Bush said, "he is a man of extraordinary accomplishment and ability. He has a good heart. He has the qualities Americans expect in a judge. Experience, wisdom, fairness and civility."
The selection was something of a surprise.
Many expected that he would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the nine-member court with a woman or a member of an ethnic minority.
Roberts has been on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, nominated by Bush, since June 2003.
presidency.
Justices serve until they retire or die.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9bc181b09d54dde0db2805ddbf1d73db
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Lawyer comment on detainee being tried by military tribunal
SHOTLIST
APTN
Washington DC, USA - 31 January 2005
1. Exteriors of US District court house
2. US flag flying
APTN
Washington DC, USA - 15 July 2005
3. Lead attorney for Salim Hamdan, Professor Neal Katyal
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Professor Neal Katyal / Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan
"I was quite surprised that the Court of Appeals took such a broad view of presidential power, a view that I think our founders would have really rebelled against for they set up a role of limited government, not one of concentrated power in the executive branch"
APTN
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba - 6 July 2005
5. Various of Camp Delta
APTN
Washington DC - 15 July 2005
6. SOUNDBITE: (English) Professor Neal Katyal, Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan:
"Certainly the issues presented by the Hamdan case are of interest to other detainees at Guantanamo Bay, who say the Geneva conventions protect them, as well as our own troops, who after all are captured by our enemies and routinely assert Geneva convention protections when they are being interrogated, or incarcerated, and so it is of interest to other detainees and our own American troops."
7. Katyal in office
8. SOUNDBITE: (English) Professor Neal Katyal, Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan
"Rules allow an appeal to the full court of the DC circuit, all 12 judges sitting in Washington, because right now only three have heard the case... or to an appeal and request to the Supreme Court of the United States that they hear the case. At this point we haven't yet decided which of those two avenues we will be pursuing."
POOL
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba - Recent
9. Exterior view of camp, barbed wire
10. Detainees through fence
STORYLINE
A Guantanamo Bay detainee, who was once Osama bin Laden's driver, can be tried by military tribunal, a federal appeals court has ruled.
The decision has cleared the way for the Pentagon to resume trials suspended when a lower court ruled the procedures unlawful.
A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled unanimously on Friday against Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni.
More broadly, it said the 1949 Geneva Convention governing prisoners of war doesn't apply to al-Qaida and its members.
That supports a key assertion of the Bush administration, which has faced international criticism for holding hundreds of terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay without full prisoner-of-war protections.
The Pentagon has argued that it's justified in using what it calls military commissions, or tribunals, to try terror suspects like Hamdan who were captured in the war in Afghanistan because they are "enemy combatants".
Hamdan, who was captured in Afghanistan in November 2001, denies conspiring to engage in acts of terrorism and denies he was a member of al-Qaida.
His lawyers say that by working as bin Laden's driver he simply wanted to earn enough money to return to Yemen, buy his own vehicle and support his family as a driver.
Two lawyers representing Hamdan, Georgetown University law professor Neal Katyal and Navy Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, said the appeals court ruling "is contrary to 200 years of constitutional law".
They claimed the ruling places absolute trust in the president, unchecked by the Constitution, statutes of Congress and long-standing treaties ratified by the Senate of the United States.
Katyal said the detainee's legal team plans a further appeal.
The Pentagon had no comment on the ruling, nor did it say whether or when it planned to resume proceedings against Hamdan and three other Guantanamo detainees.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/2aad63b81785623585803bc0a3cfe75b
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
APTN
Washington DC, USA - 31 January 2005
1. Exteriors of US District court house
2. US flag flying
APTN
Washington DC, USA - 15 July 2005
3. Lead attorney for Salim Hamdan, Professor Neal Katyal
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Professor Neal Katyal / Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan
"I was quite surprised that the Court of Appeals took such a broad view of presidential power, a view that I think our founders would have really rebelled against for they set up a role of limited government, not one of concentrated power in the executive branch"
APTN
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba - 6 July 2005
5. Various of Camp Delta
APTN
Washington DC - 15 July 2005
6. SOUNDBITE: (English) Professor Neal Katyal, Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan:
"Certainly the issues presented by the Hamdan case are of interest to other detainees at Guantanamo Bay, who say the Geneva conventions protect them, as well as our own troops, who after all are captured by our enemies and routinely assert Geneva convention protections when they are being interrogated, or incarcerated, and so it is of interest to other detainees and our own American troops."
7. Katyal in office
8. SOUNDBITE: (English) Professor Neal Katyal, Georgetown University law professor and lead attorney for Salim Hamdan
"Rules allow an appeal to the full court of the DC circuit, all 12 judges sitting in Washington, because right now only three have heard the case... or to an appeal and request to the Supreme Court of the United States that they hear the case. At this point we haven't yet decided which of those two avenues we will be pursuing."
POOL
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba - Recent
9. Exterior view of camp, barbed wire
10. Detainees through fence
STORYLINE
A Guantanamo Bay detainee, who was once Osama bin Laden's driver, can be tried by military tribunal, a federal appeals court has ruled.
The decision has cleared the way for the Pentagon to resume trials suspended when a lower court ruled the procedures unlawful.
A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled unanimously on Friday against Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni.
More broadly, it said the 1949 Geneva Convention governing prisoners of war doesn't apply to al-Qaida and its members.
That supports a key assertion of the Bush administration, which has faced international criticism for holding hundreds of terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay without full prisoner-of-war protections.
The Pentagon has argued that it's justified in using what it calls military commissions, or tribunals, to try terror suspects like Hamdan who were captured in the war in Afghanistan because they are "enemy combatants".
Hamdan, who was captured in Afghanistan in November 2001, denies conspiring to engage in acts of terrorism and denies he was a member of al-Qaida.
His lawyers say that by working as bin Laden's driver he simply wanted to earn enough money to return to Yemen, buy his own vehicle and support his family as a driver.
Two lawyers representing Hamdan, Georgetown University law professor Neal Katyal and Navy Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, said the appeals court ruling "is contrary to 200 years of constitutional law".
They claimed the ruling places absolute trust in the president, unchecked by the Constitution, statutes of Congress and long-standing treaties ratified by the Senate of the United States.
Katyal said the detainee's legal team plans a further appeal.
The Pentagon had no comment on the ruling, nor did it say whether or when it planned to resume proceedings against Hamdan and three other Guantanamo detainees.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/2aad63b81785623585803bc0a3cfe75b
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Democrat Senator comments on Supreme Court nominee
SHOTLIST
1. California Senator Dianne Feinstein walking on stage
2. Wide shot of audience
3. Close-up of woman sitting in audience
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"It''s crucial that the nominee who replaces Justice O''Connor not only be intelligent and well qualified but balanced and fair. His views should be within the mainstream and considered and they should be without bias. In other words, extreme ideology from the right or the left is unacceptable.
5. Cutaway of audience
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"It would be very difficult for me to vote to confirm someone to the Supreme Court who I knew would overturn Roe (v. Wade) and return our country to the days (applause)... and return our country to the days of the 1950s."
7. Photographer taking photo of Feinstein
8. Wide shot journalists listening to Feinstein
9. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"I will be evaluating whether Judge Roberts'' judicial philosophy represents the mainstream of American thought. And here are key questions: does he have respect for precedent, will he resist judicial activism, will he follow the law rather than seek to create the law, does he see the role of the court as ensuring access for justice for all, does he believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned, does he have compassion and empathy to the real life problems that people face and will he protect the constitutional guarantee of separation of church and state? It is my hope that judge Roberts will play a role similar to Justice O''Connor in the court."
10. Close-up of cameraman
11. Feinstein looking at picture with boy
STORYLINE
California Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein says she hopes Supreme Court nominee John Roberts will play a role similar to retiring Justice Sandra Day O''Connor, if he''s confirmed.
Speaking in Los Angeles on Wednesday, Feinstein said in the last ten years the court had made nearly 200 decisions on a five-to-four vote. O''Connor was in the majority in more than 75 percent of them.
Feinstein warned that the Senate had rejected nearly one in five Supreme Court nominees since the nation''s founding.
She emphasised that it would be "very difficult" for her to vote for someone she knew would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, which recognises the right to abortion.
The senator sits on the Judiciary Committee, which will quiz Roberts next month before his nomination goes to the full Senate.
Roberts, a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, was nominated by US President George W Bush to the highest
US court on July 19.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/c1ac18a903030bf0324f5e43738d96bf
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
1. California Senator Dianne Feinstein walking on stage
2. Wide shot of audience
3. Close-up of woman sitting in audience
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"It''s crucial that the nominee who replaces Justice O''Connor not only be intelligent and well qualified but balanced and fair. His views should be within the mainstream and considered and they should be without bias. In other words, extreme ideology from the right or the left is unacceptable.
5. Cutaway of audience
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"It would be very difficult for me to vote to confirm someone to the Supreme Court who I knew would overturn Roe (v. Wade) and return our country to the days (applause)... and return our country to the days of the 1950s."
7. Photographer taking photo of Feinstein
8. Wide shot journalists listening to Feinstein
9. SOUNDBITE (English) Dianne Feinstein, California Senator:
"I will be evaluating whether Judge Roberts'' judicial philosophy represents the mainstream of American thought. And here are key questions: does he have respect for precedent, will he resist judicial activism, will he follow the law rather than seek to create the law, does he see the role of the court as ensuring access for justice for all, does he believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned, does he have compassion and empathy to the real life problems that people face and will he protect the constitutional guarantee of separation of church and state? It is my hope that judge Roberts will play a role similar to Justice O''Connor in the court."
10. Close-up of cameraman
11. Feinstein looking at picture with boy
STORYLINE
California Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein says she hopes Supreme Court nominee John Roberts will play a role similar to retiring Justice Sandra Day O''Connor, if he''s confirmed.
Speaking in Los Angeles on Wednesday, Feinstein said in the last ten years the court had made nearly 200 decisions on a five-to-four vote. O''Connor was in the majority in more than 75 percent of them.
Feinstein warned that the Senate had rejected nearly one in five Supreme Court nominees since the nation''s founding.
She emphasised that it would be "very difficult" for her to vote for someone she knew would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, which recognises the right to abortion.
The senator sits on the Judiciary Committee, which will quiz Roberts next month before his nomination goes to the full Senate.
Roberts, a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, was nominated by US President George W Bush to the highest
US court on July 19.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/c1ac18a903030bf0324f5e43738d96bf
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
Rome, 26 August 2005
1. Appeals court
2. Defence lawyer, Antonietta Sonnessa exiting the court
3. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Hamdi Issac''s lawyer:
"I''m filing an appeal request in Cassation Court against the decision which was issued on August 17th."
4. Flags
5. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Hamdi Issac''s lawyer:
"I expect that my request will be accepted concerning the verification of the expert report and then that there might be more investigations on the event."
6. Lawyer Sonnessa outside Appeal Court
7. Copy of appeal documents
8. SOUNDBITE: (English) Paolo Iorio, lawyer representing the British government
"I was expecting that, I think, you know, it is the right of the defence to appeal and I have to read the reasons included and of course we have to challenge it. The Cassation court will fix it probably, but it is sure because it is provided by law, within 15 days."
8. Cameraman
FILE
Rome, 1st Aug 2005
9. Policeman showing Hamdi Issac''s photos
STORYLINE:
A suspect in the failed July 21 London bombings who was arrested in Rome appealed an Italian court''s extradition ruling on Friday, saying he feared that "heightened tension" in Britain might affect legal proceedings against him, his lawyer said.
Hamdi Issac was ordered extradited to Britain by a Rome court earlier this month.
Lawyer Antonietta Sonnessa said the appeal was filed with the Court of Cassation, Italy''s highest court.
Under Italian law, the Court of Cassation has to make its ruling within 15 days.
Sonnessa said the appeal is based on what she said was a lack of proper documentation by the British authorities and a fear of "an atmosphere of heightened tension" in Britain following the failed attacks and the deadly suicide bombings on July 7 that killed 52 and the four bombers.
Issac, a British citizen also known as Osman Hussain, was arrested on an international arrest warrant in the Italian capital on July 29.
Sonnessa said Issac wants to remain in Italy.
British authorities are seeking Issac for his alleged role in the attempted bombing at London''s Shepherd''s Bush station, one of four botched attacks on London''s transport system July 21.
Nobody died in the attacks.
According to Sonnessa, Issac has claimed the attacks were not meant to be deadly, and that the botched bombing was a "demonstrative action."
Paolo Iorio, a lawyer representing the British government in the case, said they would challenge the appeal.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/70b0258d4e3f1e4698b1adf2b9c5572c
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
Rome, 26 August 2005
1. Appeals court
2. Defence lawyer, Antonietta Sonnessa exiting the court
3. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Hamdi Issac''s lawyer:
"I''m filing an appeal request in Cassation Court against the decision which was issued on August 17th."
4. Flags
5. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Hamdi Issac''s lawyer:
"I expect that my request will be accepted concerning the verification of the expert report and then that there might be more investigations on the event."
6. Lawyer Sonnessa outside Appeal Court
7. Copy of appeal documents
8. SOUNDBITE: (English) Paolo Iorio, lawyer representing the British government
"I was expecting that, I think, you know, it is the right of the defence to appeal and I have to read the reasons included and of course we have to challenge it. The Cassation court will fix it probably, but it is sure because it is provided by law, within 15 days."
8. Cameraman
FILE
Rome, 1st Aug 2005
9. Policeman showing Hamdi Issac''s photos
STORYLINE:
A suspect in the failed July 21 London bombings who was arrested in Rome appealed an Italian court''s extradition ruling on Friday, saying he feared that "heightened tension" in Britain might affect legal proceedings against him, his lawyer said.
Hamdi Issac was ordered extradited to Britain by a Rome court earlier this month.
Lawyer Antonietta Sonnessa said the appeal was filed with the Court of Cassation, Italy''s highest court.
Under Italian law, the Court of Cassation has to make its ruling within 15 days.
Sonnessa said the appeal is based on what she said was a lack of proper documentation by the British authorities and a fear of "an atmosphere of heightened tension" in Britain following the failed attacks and the deadly suicide bombings on July 7 that killed 52 and the four bombers.
Issac, a British citizen also known as Osman Hussain, was arrested on an international arrest warrant in the Italian capital on July 29.
Sonnessa said Issac wants to remain in Italy.
British authorities are seeking Issac for his alleged role in the attempted bombing at London''s Shepherd''s Bush station, one of four botched attacks on London''s transport system July 21.
Nobody died in the attacks.
According to Sonnessa, Issac has claimed the attacks were not meant to be deadly, and that the botched bombing was a "demonstrative action."
Paolo Iorio, a lawyer representing the British government in the case, said they would challenge the appeal.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/70b0258d4e3f1e4698b1adf2b9c5572c
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Appeal hearing for UK bombing suspect, lawyer comments
SHOTLIST
1. Exterior of appeals Court Rome
2. Italian flag on courthouse
3. Traffic police car
4. Lawyer representing the British Government Paolo Iorio enters courthouse
UPSOUND (English) Paolo Iorio, Lawyer representing British Government
"Later at the end of the hearing" (responding to reporter question about when the court decision is expected)
5. Wide of lawyers and journalists in hallway
6. Cutaway police outside courtroom
7. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Defence Lawyer
(regarding Hamdi Issac's state of mind) "Well, the frame of mind of a person waiting for an important decision - important because he didn't agree to the extradition, so it's clear that he is waiting and hoping that the decision will be favourable to what he wants."
8. Pan down room number to police
9. People in hallway
10. Antonietta Sonnessa, Defence Lawyer walks through media
11. SOUNDBITE: (English) Paolo Iorio, Lawyer representing British Government
"I asked them to reject the application of course - as already I told you, because I consider it unfounded, because I think there are no grounds and I don't think it is admissible this application - it's not admissible to reject it. In my opinion I think they have to accept the request came from the UK to transfer him to the UK. Eventually I told the court not to be afraid to be tried over there by the United Kingdom by the best lawyer that he asks for, pay everything about his case - so I don't know why he has to be afraid to be tried there."
12. Lawyers outside court room
13. Exterior of court
STORYLINE
Italy's highest court is holding an appeals hearing in the extradition case of a suspect wanted by Britain in connection with the attempted bombings in London on July 21.
Paolo Iorio, a lawyer representing the British government in the case, said the Court of Cassation was expected to issue its ruling in the case of Hamdi Issac later Tuesday.
A Rome court last month ordered Issac to be extradited to Britain.
His lawyer filed an appeal, citing what she said was lack of proper documentation by the British authorities and saying Issac feared "heightened tension" in Britain might affect proceedings against him.
Iorio described the reasons give in the appeals request as "completely groundless" and said that Issac had nothing to fear from a trial in Britain, where the judicial system would provide him with legal representation.
Should the extradition be upheld, Issac would have to leave Italy within the next 10 days, Iorio said.
Issac, a British citizen also known as Osman Hussain, was arrested on an international arrest warrant in the Italian capital on July 29.
British authorities are seeking Issac's extradition for his alleged role in the attempted bombing at the Shepherd's Bush station, one of four failed attacks on London's transport system on July 21.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/98d644e875f04adcb5e3448451376b88
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
1. Exterior of appeals Court Rome
2. Italian flag on courthouse
3. Traffic police car
4. Lawyer representing the British Government Paolo Iorio enters courthouse
UPSOUND (English) Paolo Iorio, Lawyer representing British Government
"Later at the end of the hearing" (responding to reporter question about when the court decision is expected)
5. Wide of lawyers and journalists in hallway
6. Cutaway police outside courtroom
7. SOUNDBITE: (Italian) Antonietta Sonnessa, Defence Lawyer
(regarding Hamdi Issac's state of mind) "Well, the frame of mind of a person waiting for an important decision - important because he didn't agree to the extradition, so it's clear that he is waiting and hoping that the decision will be favourable to what he wants."
8. Pan down room number to police
9. People in hallway
10. Antonietta Sonnessa, Defence Lawyer walks through media
11. SOUNDBITE: (English) Paolo Iorio, Lawyer representing British Government
"I asked them to reject the application of course - as already I told you, because I consider it unfounded, because I think there are no grounds and I don't think it is admissible this application - it's not admissible to reject it. In my opinion I think they have to accept the request came from the UK to transfer him to the UK. Eventually I told the court not to be afraid to be tried over there by the United Kingdom by the best lawyer that he asks for, pay everything about his case - so I don't know why he has to be afraid to be tried there."
12. Lawyers outside court room
13. Exterior of court
STORYLINE
Italy's highest court is holding an appeals hearing in the extradition case of a suspect wanted by Britain in connection with the attempted bombings in London on July 21.
Paolo Iorio, a lawyer representing the British government in the case, said the Court of Cassation was expected to issue its ruling in the case of Hamdi Issac later Tuesday.
A Rome court last month ordered Issac to be extradited to Britain.
His lawyer filed an appeal, citing what she said was lack of proper documentation by the British authorities and saying Issac feared "heightened tension" in Britain might affect proceedings against him.
Iorio described the reasons give in the appeals request as "completely groundless" and said that Issac had nothing to fear from a trial in Britain, where the judicial system would provide him with legal representation.
Should the extradition be upheld, Issac would have to leave Italy within the next 10 days, Iorio said.
Issac, a British citizen also known as Osman Hussain, was arrested on an international arrest warrant in the Italian capital on July 29.
British authorities are seeking Issac's extradition for his alleged role in the attempted bombing at the Shepherd's Bush station, one of four failed attacks on London's transport system on July 21.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/98d644e875f04adcb5e3448451376b88
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
Ex-police officers on trial for journalist's killing
SHOTLIST
Kiev - 9 Jan 2006
1. Wide exterior of Kiev Court of Appeals
2. Staircase inside the courthouse, crowd of journalists waiting outside
3. Miroslava, widow of slain journalist Heorhiy Gongadze entering
4. Wide shot court session
5. Close up shot presiding judge at the trial
6. Wide shot court session
7. Mid shot Miroslava, centre, during the session
8. Mid shot prosecutors
9. Wide shot court session
10. Miroslava Gongadze surrounded by journalists outside the courtroom
11. SOUNDBITE (Ukrainian) Miroslava Gongadze, Widow of slain journalist Heorhiy Gongadze:
"We are going to summon many witnesses, including witnesses who are going to shed new light on the entire matter."
File
12. Meeting with Gongadze present
13. Close up Gongadze
14. Gongadze at rally being questioned by police
15. Various Gongadze working at office
16. Floral tribute to Gongadze on the street
17. Various people visiting memorial site
STORYLINE
Three former police officers went on trial on Monday for their alleged involvement in the killing of investigative Ukrainian journalist Heorhiy Gongadze, a high-profile case that authorities have vowed to solve.
Dozens of people including lawyers, relatives and prosecutors packed the tiny court room at the Kiev Appeals Court to watch the first substantive hearing in the Gongadze case - a trial that is widely seen as a litmus test for President Viktor Yushchenko and his government's ability to enforce the rule of law.
Gongadze, a 31-year-old Internet reporter who wrote about high-level corruption, was abducted and his beheaded body was found in a forest outside Kiev in the fall of 2000. The incident sparked months of protests against former President Leonid Kuchma.
The three defendants,Valery Kostenko, Mykola Protasov and Alexander Popovyc, have been charged in connection with the actual killing, but the organisers of the crime have yet to be found.
A key witness has alleged that former President Leonid Kuchma and Volodymyr Lytvyn, the current parliament speaker who was Kuchma's chief of staff at the time, were involved in the murder.
On secret tape recordings, a voice resembling Kuchma's is heard conspiring against Gongadze, along with Lytvyn. Both have repeatedly denied the allegations.
Both have repeatedly denied the allegations.
President Viktor Yushchenko said he's committed to solving Gongadze's killing.
Speaking outside the courtroom before the start of the hearing, Gongadze's widow Myroslava said the beginning of the trial was an important step in punishing the guilty, but lamented that the true masterminds have not been identified.
However she did warn that more witnesses will be summoned and that they'll be shedding "new light on the matter".
Gongadze lawyer Andrei Fedur asked the court to recuse one of the three judges overseeing the proceedings, accusing her of being biased. The court adjourned for one hour to rule on the motion.
Outside the court, Gongadze's widow said that many witnesses would be summoned "to to shed new light on the entire matter."
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/bca08472307626a89a35036c3c3e2783
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
SHOTLIST
Kiev - 9 Jan 2006
1. Wide exterior of Kiev Court of Appeals
2. Staircase inside the courthouse, crowd of journalists waiting outside
3. Miroslava, widow of slain journalist Heorhiy Gongadze entering
4. Wide shot court session
5. Close up shot presiding judge at the trial
6. Wide shot court session
7. Mid shot Miroslava, centre, during the session
8. Mid shot prosecutors
9. Wide shot court session
10. Miroslava Gongadze surrounded by journalists outside the courtroom
11. SOUNDBITE (Ukrainian) Miroslava Gongadze, Widow of slain journalist Heorhiy Gongadze:
"We are going to summon many witnesses, including witnesses who are going to shed new light on the entire matter."
File
12. Meeting with Gongadze present
13. Close up Gongadze
14. Gongadze at rally being questioned by police
15. Various Gongadze working at office
16. Floral tribute to Gongadze on the street
17. Various people visiting memorial site
STORYLINE
Three former police officers went on trial on Monday for their alleged involvement in the killing of investigative Ukrainian journalist Heorhiy Gongadze, a high-profile case that authorities have vowed to solve.
Dozens of people including lawyers, relatives and prosecutors packed the tiny court room at the Kiev Appeals Court to watch the first substantive hearing in the Gongadze case - a trial that is widely seen as a litmus test for President Viktor Yushchenko and his government's ability to enforce the rule of law.
Gongadze, a 31-year-old Internet reporter who wrote about high-level corruption, was abducted and his beheaded body was found in a forest outside Kiev in the fall of 2000. The incident sparked months of protests against former President Leonid Kuchma.
The three defendants,Valery Kostenko, Mykola Protasov and Alexander Popovyc, have been charged in connection with the actual killing, but the organisers of the crime have yet to be found.
A key witness has alleged that former President Leonid Kuchma and Volodymyr Lytvyn, the current parliament speaker who was Kuchma's chief of staff at the time, were involved in the murder.
On secret tape recordings, a voice resembling Kuchma's is heard conspiring against Gongadze, along with Lytvyn. Both have repeatedly denied the allegations.
Both have repeatedly denied the allegations.
President Viktor Yushchenko said he's committed to solving Gongadze's killing.
Speaking outside the courtroom before the start of the hearing, Gongadze's widow Myroslava said the beginning of the trial was an important step in punishing the guilty, but lamented that the true masterminds have not been identified.
However she did warn that more witnesses will be summoned and that they'll be shedding "new light on the matter".
Gongadze lawyer Andrei Fedur asked the court to recuse one of the three judges overseeing the proceedings, accusing her of being biased. The court adjourned for one hour to rule on the motion.
Outside the court, Gongadze's widow said that many witnesses would be summoned "to to shed new light on the entire matter."
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/bca08472307626a89a35036c3c3e2783
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
WRAP Bush calls for fair hearings for Supreme Court nominee, plus more hearings
US POOL
The Capitol, Washington, DC 09 September 2006
1. Wide shot of Alito with Senate Judiciary Committee members
2. Wide shot of chamber
3. Close-up of Alito
4. SOUNDBITE (English: Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
"I am committed as Chairman to a full, fair and dignified hearing. Hearings for a Supreme Court nominee should not have a political tilt for either Republicans or Democrats - they should be in substance and perception for all Americans."
5. Alito listening / Alito cutaway
6. SOUNDBITE: Senator Edward Kennedy, Democrat, Massachusettes:
"Ultimately the courts will make the final judgement if the White House has gone too far. Independent and impartial judges must access the proper balance between protecting our liberties and protecting our national security. I'm gravely concerned that judge Alito's clear record of support for vast presidential authority unchecked by the other two branches of government. In decision after decision on the bench he has excused abusive actions by the authorities that intrude on the personal privacy and freedoms on average Americans, and in his writings and speeches he has supported a level of overeaching presidential power that frankly most Americans find disturbing and even frightening."
7. Alito swearing in
8. Cutaway
9. SOUNDBITE: Samuel Alito, Supreme Court nominee:
"And there is nothing more important for our republic than the rule of law. No person in this country no matter how high or powerful is above the law and no person in this country is beneath the law. Fifteen years ago when I was sworn in as the judge of the court of appeals I took an oath I put my hand on the bible and I swore that I would administer justice without respect to persons, that I would do equal rights to the poor and to the rich and that I would carry out my duties under the constitution and the laws of the United States. And that is what I have tried to do to the best of my ability for the past 15 years, and if I am confirmed I pledge to you that is what I would do on the Supreme Court. Thank you."
10. Alito gets up
STORYLINE:
Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito told U.S. Senators ON Monday that good judges don't have an agenda, don't look for partisan outcomes and always "do what the law requires" as the Senate opened hearings on President George W. Bush's choice for the high court.
Alito, a conservative jurist on the federal appeals court, would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been a decisive swing vote on abortion, affirmative action and death penalty cases. If confirmed, Alito
would be the nation's 110th Supreme Court justice.
After listening to opening statements from the 18 members of the committee, Alito got his chance to speak and described his Italian immigrant father's background, his mother's work experience and his own academic
career. He told the panel about his legal philosophy.
In his 11-minute statement, the judge gave no indication about how he might respond to the tough questions Democrats have promised on the divisive issues of executive power, abortion and the privacy rights.
Democrats fear that Alito, a conservative judge, could tilt the nine-member Supreme Court sharply to the right. Alito would replace Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been the swing vote on abortion and other contentious
issues that come before the highest U.S. court.
Alito would likely win a majority in the Republican-controlled Senate. But Democrats haven't ruled out attempting fillibuster - a politically risky delaying tactic - to derail the nomination.
Alito said his solemn obligation is to the rule of law and that a judge must do what the law requires.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/527d32c2846ea18cea9f87a0f8957f29
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
US POOL
The Capitol, Washington, DC 09 September 2006
1. Wide shot of Alito with Senate Judiciary Committee members
2. Wide shot of chamber
3. Close-up of Alito
4. SOUNDBITE (English: Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
"I am committed as Chairman to a full, fair and dignified hearing. Hearings for a Supreme Court nominee should not have a political tilt for either Republicans or Democrats - they should be in substance and perception for all Americans."
5. Alito listening / Alito cutaway
6. SOUNDBITE: Senator Edward Kennedy, Democrat, Massachusettes:
"Ultimately the courts will make the final judgement if the White House has gone too far. Independent and impartial judges must access the proper balance between protecting our liberties and protecting our national security. I'm gravely concerned that judge Alito's clear record of support for vast presidential authority unchecked by the other two branches of government. In decision after decision on the bench he has excused abusive actions by the authorities that intrude on the personal privacy and freedoms on average Americans, and in his writings and speeches he has supported a level of overeaching presidential power that frankly most Americans find disturbing and even frightening."
7. Alito swearing in
8. Cutaway
9. SOUNDBITE: Samuel Alito, Supreme Court nominee:
"And there is nothing more important for our republic than the rule of law. No person in this country no matter how high or powerful is above the law and no person in this country is beneath the law. Fifteen years ago when I was sworn in as the judge of the court of appeals I took an oath I put my hand on the bible and I swore that I would administer justice without respect to persons, that I would do equal rights to the poor and to the rich and that I would carry out my duties under the constitution and the laws of the United States. And that is what I have tried to do to the best of my ability for the past 15 years, and if I am confirmed I pledge to you that is what I would do on the Supreme Court. Thank you."
10. Alito gets up
STORYLINE:
Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito told U.S. Senators ON Monday that good judges don't have an agenda, don't look for partisan outcomes and always "do what the law requires" as the Senate opened hearings on President George W. Bush's choice for the high court.
Alito, a conservative jurist on the federal appeals court, would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been a decisive swing vote on abortion, affirmative action and death penalty cases. If confirmed, Alito
would be the nation's 110th Supreme Court justice.
After listening to opening statements from the 18 members of the committee, Alito got his chance to speak and described his Italian immigrant father's background, his mother's work experience and his own academic
career. He told the panel about his legal philosophy.
In his 11-minute statement, the judge gave no indication about how he might respond to the tough questions Democrats have promised on the divisive issues of executive power, abortion and the privacy rights.
Democrats fear that Alito, a conservative judge, could tilt the nine-member Supreme Court sharply to the right. Alito would replace Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been the swing vote on abortion and other contentious
issues that come before the highest U.S. court.
Alito would likely win a majority in the Republican-controlled Senate. But Democrats haven't ruled out attempting fillibuster - a politically risky delaying tactic - to derail the nomination.
Alito said his solemn obligation is to the rule of law and that a judge must do what the law requires.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/527d32c2846ea18cea9f87a0f8957f29
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, a...
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Cou...
published:15 Apr 2015
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
published:15 Apr 2015
views:10
0:00
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th D...
published:13 Apr 2015
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Carpio Morales v. CA Oral Arguments
Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.
published:13 Apr 2015
views:0
15:00
The Need-to-Knows of Appeals & the Appeals Court
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk ...
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and b...
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench...
published:22 Jan 2015
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
published:22 Jan 2015
views:121
41:09
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in U...
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014....
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
The Solicitor General argued before the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeals has no aut...
published:15 Apr 2015
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
Court of Appeals has no authority to issue TRO vs Ombudsman — Solicitor General
The Solicitor General argued before the Supreme Court that the Court of Appeals has no authority to issue an injunction on the Ombudsman.
Joyce Balancio tells us why.
AIRING DATE: April 14, 2015
For more videos: http://www.untvweb.com/video/
published:15 Apr 2015
views:9
2:05
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vic...
published:17 Jun 2015
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
Court of Appeals, ipinag-utos na bayaran si Espinosa ng naulila ng promoter ng kanyang laban
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
published:17 Jun 2015
views:9745
5:35
Obamacare Court Of Appeals Rulings Explained
Obamacare is facing a legal challenge in the form of Halbig v. Burwell where a federal app...
Obamacare is facing a legal challenge in the form of Halbig v. Burwell where a federal appeals court in Washington, DC decided that the government cannot iss...
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
Maryland Court of Appeals: Retroactive Sex Offender Law is Unconstitutional
On March 4, 2013 the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that retroactively requiring a person to register as a sex offender in accordance with laws created in 2...
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on A...
published:21 Apr 2015
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Morning Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
published:21 Apr 2015
views:9
7:32
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vic...
published:16 Mar 2015
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras: Pagsuspinde kay Mayor Junjun Binay, pinigilan ng Court of Appeals
24 Oras is GMA Network’s flagship newscast, anchored by Mike Enriquez, Mel Tiangco and Vicky Morales. It airs on GMA-7 Mondays to Fridays at 6:30 PM (PHL Time) and on weekends at 5:30 PM. For more videos from 24 Oras, visit http://www.gmanetwork.com/24oras.
GMA News Online: http://www.gmanews.tv
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gmanews
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/gmanews
published:16 Mar 2015
views:29
3:21
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U....
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory who says that the strugg...
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
City of Seattle police officers appeal from the denial of qualified immunity in an action ...
published:09 Apr 2015
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
13-35433, 13-35434 Nathaniel Caylor v. The City of Seattle
City of Seattle police officers appeal from the denial of qualified immunity in an action brought by Nathaniel Caylor and his son W.C., alleging officers unreasonably used excessive force during a response to a 911 call.
published:09 Apr 2015
views:65
41:18
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
The Waseca County Attorney's office appealed Waseca teen John LaDue's dismissed attempted ...
published:07 Jan 2015
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
Waseca teen John LaDue case before the Minnesota Court of Appeals
The Waseca County Attorney's office appealed Waseca teen John LaDue's dismissed attempted murder charges to the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Jan. 7, 2014.
LaDue is accused of plotting a school shooting.
The video was shot for all press in attendance by KARE 11
published:07 Jan 2015
views:74
153:18
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06...
published:08 Apr 2011
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
published:08 Apr 2011
views:7204
120:35
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on A...
published:22 Apr 2015
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments 2015 - Afternoon Session
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
published:22 Apr 2015
views:7
50:31
The United States Court of Appeals
Dr. Stephen Wasby outlines the judicial processes as they relate to the United States Cour...
Dr. Stephen Wasby outlines the judicial processes as they relate to the United States Court of Appeals; their circuit jurisdictions; appellate systems; and t...
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.
published:30 Jan 2010
views:7822
0:00
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address...
published:09 Feb 2015
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
Maryland Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera’s State of the Judiciary address
published:09 Feb 2015
views:0
43:35
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7/8/13 Oral Arguments of BP appeal on oil spill claims process
Full audio of July 8th, 2013 oral arguments in the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regardi...
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7/8/13 Oral Arguments of BP appeal on oil spill claims process
5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 7/8/13 Oral Arguments of BP appeal on oil spill claims process
Full audio of July 8th, 2013 oral arguments in the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Deepwater Horizon claims settlement process. B.P. is contest...
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006. Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of ...
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded t...
APTN
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
1. Wide shot police vehicle driving into compound
2...
published:21 Jul 2015
Men convicted of murdering NZ sailor to appeal
Men convicted of murdering NZ sailor to appeal
APTN
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
1. Wide shot police vehicle driving into compound
2. Seven men convicted (then suspected) of killing New Zealand yachtsmen Peter Blake leave vehicle
3. Various men inside police station
TV GLOBO
Macapa, Brazil - January 20002
4. Wide shot courtroom
5. Wide shot convicted men (then accused)
6. Various guns and evidence
Macapa, Brazil - December 2001
7. Various Blake's Seamaster boat
8. Mid shot police on board
TV3
Brazil - 2001
9. Wide shot boat
10. Various Blake talking to visitors
11. Blake and crew on board small boats on river
12. Mid shot crocodiles
13. Blake and crew in dinghy
14. Blake on beach, looks towards camera
TV GLOBO
Rio de Janeiro - September 2001
15. Blake laughing on board boat
APTN
Warbington, Hampshire, UK - December 2001
16. Wide shot Blake's funeral
17. Mid shot New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark
18. Mid shot British yachtswoman Ellen MacArthur
19. Various coffin being carried through graveyard
STORYLINE:
The Brazilian court of appeals on Tuesday is scheduled to give it's ruling on the six men convicted of killing New Zealand yachtsman Peter Blake in June 2002.
The Macapa courtroom has reviewed the cases of the six men who were sentenced to more than 20 years each for killing and robbing the sailing great during a failed robbery attempt on the Amazon river in Brazil in December 2001.
Ricardo Colares Tavares, who confessed to firing the fatal shots, received the maximum sentence of more than 36 years.
Five others received sentences ranging from 35 years to 26 years.
Several of the sentences were largely symbolic, because under Brazilian law no one can serve more than 30 years in prison at a single stretch.
Peter Blake who led New Zealand to America's Cup victories in 1995 and 2000, was on a worldwide expedition to monitor global warming and pollution when he was killed.
He was returning from a two-month stay in the upper reaches of the Amazon and Rio Negro rivers at the time of the robbery near Macapa, 1,800 miles (2,800 km) northwest of Rio de Janeiro.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/1751b6c76936671136c4a979a8c8167c
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
1:45
Luster's lawyer in appeal hearing
APTN - 20 June 2003
1. Mid shot of attorney Roger Diamond speaking to reporters.
2. ...
published:21 Jul 2015
Luster's lawyer in appeal hearing
Luster's lawyer in appeal hearing
APTN - 20 June 2003
1. Mid shot of attorney Roger Diamond speaking to reporters.
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"The appelate court is to consider legal errors committed during the course of the trial. And the fact that he (Andrew Luster) fled or didn't flee is irrelevant in terms of the appelate issues to be presented to the court of appeal, which so far we're precluded from doing because the court of appeal dismissed the appeal. We're going to ask the state supreme court to reinstate that appeal to allow the judge's rulings made in the trial court to be reviewed as any criminal defendant has the right to do when he is convicted."
POOL - 19 June 2003
3. Close shot of Andrew Luster in custody led by US officials to car.
APTN - 20 June 2003
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"They're basically keeping him incommunicado. We couldn't speak to him, obviously, on the plane. He was considered to be in custody. When he arrived at LA International Airport he was considered to be in custody and we didn't have a visit. We couldn't visit with him. And he was taken immediately to a state facility up in Kern County to be designated. And the position of the state authorities is that until he's designated to some institution he cannot have visitors. I disagree with that and we're working on that now to get him access."
POOL - 19 June 2003
5. Close shot of Luster inside car.
APTN - 20 June 2003
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Roger Diamond, attorney.
"I mean if he said to me, 'Roger don't appeal', I could dismiss it in a moment. I can guarantee you that he wants the appeal to go forward only because that's my intuition. But I've had no contact with him at all."
POOL - 19 June 2003
7. Close shot of Luster in car seated next to US official. Mid shot of car pulling away.
STORYLINE
An appeal has been filed on behalf of Max Factor cosmetics heir and convicted rapist Andrew Luster.
Luster's attorney, Roger Diamond, filed papers in Los Angeles on Friday, asking the California Supreme Court to consider whether Luster can appeal his conviction.
Luster was captured in Mexico this week after skipping out on his trial.
An appeals court had ruled against considering an appeal of Luster's rape conviction, saying he had given up that right when he became a fugitive.
But Diamond said Luster's return to the US allowed him to beat a deadline for seeking the action.
Luster was captured by bounty hunters on Wednesday in Mexico and later arrested by authorities there.
He was flown to Los Angeles on Thursday and transferred to a state facility.
Luster was convicted in absentia in January of drugging and raping three women.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/1d75dafbe3d3e6aa5d6aedf5e97e2e2e
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
2:44
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
APTN
Katsina, Nigeria - 27 August 2003
1. Wide of exterior of courts
2. Mid shot of sig...
published:21 Jul 2015
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
Woman at centre of international outcry over stoning appears in court
APTN
Katsina, Nigeria - 27 August 2003
1. Wide of exterior of courts
2. Mid shot of sign Katsina State Judiciary Sharia Court of Appeal Headquarters
3. Mid shot of riot police guarding court
4. Mid shot of guard
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Aliyu Musa, Defence Lawyer:
"We are certain and we are confident the appeal will succeed and the death sentence will be set aside."
6. Musa talking to two men at courthouse
7. Amina Lawal getting out of car carrying baby
8. Amina Lawal walking to court
9. Amina Lawal entering court
10. Various of Amina and daughter sitting in courthouse
11. Amina Lawal crying
12. Amina's councillors comforting Amina
13. Marie Poulain, Lawyers Without Borders at court
14. SOUNDBITE: (English) Marie Poulain, Avocats Sans Frontieres (Lawyers Without Borders):
"As lawyers we are always ready for the worst but we still are quite hopeful. We must always be ready."
15. Sharia judges entering court
16. Judges sitting down
17. Lawyers at court looking at judges
18. People leaving courthouse
19. Interior of courthouse with judge leaving
20. Three judges talking while leaving
21. Lawyers leaving court
22. Exterior of court with Amina Lawal walking with lawyers
23. SOUNDBITE: (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer of Amina Lawal:
"My expectations as a lawyer, I hope, I am hopeful we did .... so that she (Amina) will be discharged and acquitted on the 25th of September by the grace of God. However, we are always prepared for the worst. Just in case we fail, we are going to go to the courts of appeal in Kaduna."
24. Hauwa Ibrahim carrying Amina Lawal's baby while Amina sits in a car
25. Various of riot police outside court
26. Lawyers laughing outside courthouse
STORYLINE:
Lawyers in Nigeria argued on Wednesday for the life of a single mother sentenced to death by stoning for adultery.
The condemned woman nursed her toddler during the hearing in the northern Islamic court which was deciding her fate.
Thirty-two-year-old Amina Lawal appeared overwhelmed by the crush of riot police, journalists and rights workers as she appeared for her hearing.
Thirty-five riot police ringed the courthouse, the heaviest security yet in what has been more than a year of off-and-on hearings.
Lawal, a divorced woman, was convicted of adultery in March 2002 by an Islamic court following the birth of her daughter, Wasila, out of wedlock.
Acting on the Islamic law, or Shariah, adopted in a dozen predominantly Muslim northern Nigerian states, judges ordered Lawal be buried up to her neck in sand and then stoned to death.
While her appeals continue, judges have ordered Lawal's execution postponed until she weans the child born of her extramarital affair.
The alleged father of the baby denied responsibility and was acquitted.
As the case opened in a stifling court room, Lawal appeared distracted from proceedings, nursing and playing with her child.
She rarely watched the lawyers, at one point falling asleep, with her daughter also nodding off in her arms.
Nearly an hour into the hearing, the chief judge, or Grand Khadi, Aminu Ibrahim, warned the more than dozen volunteer and charity-appointed attorneys clamouring to give arguments on Lawal's behalf, not to stall their appeals.
Katsina state authorities have insisted the case go through the Shariah appeals process despite requests by Nigeria's federal government that Lawal be freed.
Past hearings have repeatedly been cancelled, in what some have suspected is an attempt to deflect attention following international campaigns by rights movements and women's groups.
punishment.
Lawal and her former husband divorced two years before the baby was born.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/00b2bbad0bbd0f2100a4d1f420036fa7
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
1:40
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
SHOTLIST
ALL TOKO MATERIAL
1. Car pulls into main entrance to Shariah court
2. Sign
...
published:21 Jul 2015
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
GNS WRAP Mother in stoning case wins appeal, adds court interiors
SHOTLIST
ALL TOKO MATERIAL
1. Car pulls into main entrance to Shariah court
2. Sign
3. Various of soldiers outside court
4. Amina Lawal gets out of car carrying baby
5. Lawal walks into court
6. Court officials
7. Lawal holding baby talking to her lawyer Hauwa Ibrahim
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Hauwa Ibrahim, lawyer representing Amina Lawal:
"We are expecting to see Amina discharged and acquitted and we hope that she will have a life, a normal life for herself."
9. Ibrahim sitting in court
10. Interior of court
11. Judges sitting in court
12. Close up of Lawal sitting in court
13. People peering through windows into court
14. Close up of judge's hands
15. Close up of judge reading out verdict UPSOUND (Hausa) "She's been acquitted"
16. People getting up to leave courtroom
17. SOUNDBITE (English) Catherine Mabille, representative of Lawyers without Borders, who had been advising the defence:
"Well, you know, as lawyers, we are always sceptical. So we are very happy now. But we were expecting that".
18. Lawal coming out of court holding baby
STORYLINE
An Islamic appeals court in northern Nigeria on Thursday overturned the conviction of a single mother facing death by stoning for having sex out of wedlock in a case that has drawn world attention and dragged on for over a year.
A five-judge panel at the Katsina State Shariah Court of Appeals rejected Amina Lawal's conviction four to one, saying she was not given "ample opportunity to defend herself".
In an hour-long ruling, the judges said Lawal was not caught in the act and wasn't given enough time to understand the charges against her.
They also cited procedural errors, including that only one judge was present at her initial conviction in March 2002, instead of the three required under Islamic law.
Judge Ibrahim Mai-Unguwa, reading the verdict, said the court accepted Lawal's appeal and she was free to go.
Lawal, wrapped in a light orange veil, sat on a metal chair, eyes downcast, cradling her nearly two-year-old daughter.
After the verdict, police and lawyers hustled her out of the room before she could answer journalists' questions.
If Lawal's sentence had been carried out, the 32-year-old would have been the first woman stoned to death since 12 northern states first began adopting strict Islamic law, or Shariah, in 1999.
She was first convicted in March 2002 following the birth of her daughter two years after she divorced her husband.
Judges rejected Lawal's first appeal in August 2002.
Prosecutors argued Lawal's child was living proof she committed a crime under Shariah.
But her defence team argued that under some interpretations of Shariah, babies can remain in gestation in a mother's womb for five years, opening the possibility her ex-husband could have fathered the child.
They also argued Lawal's case should be dropped because no lawyers were present when she first testified she'd slept with another man following her divorce.
They said Lawal - a poor, uneducated woman from a rural family - didn't understand the charges against her at the time.
Lawal has identified her alleged sexual partner and said he promised to marry her.
The alleged partner, who would also have faced a stoning sentence, has denied any impropriety and has been acquitted for lack of evidence.
Lawal was the second Nigerian woman to have been condemned to death for having sex out of wedlock under Islamic law.
The first woman, Safiya Hussaini, had her sentence overturned in March on her first appeal in the city of Sokoto - the
same time that Lawal was first convicted.
Lawal's case drew sharp criticism from international rights groups.
Last week, Brazil even offered her asylum.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/9454a5b3cf5cb8448514b158d9918c14
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
2:26
Federal court postpones recall
APTN
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
1. Walk up view of California Governor...
published:21 Jul 2015
Federal court postpones recall
Federal court postpones recall
APTN
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
1. Walk up view of California Governor Gray Davis
2. Cutaway reporters
3. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"This recall has been like a roller coaster, there are more surprises than you can possibly imagine and I'm just going to keep focused, keep telling people why I think this recall is bad for them."
4. Cutaway reporters & cameramen
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Gray Davis, California Governor:
"Lets wait until the court decides and have we seen a few surprises in this election. I mean the guy who put this on the ballot, Darrell Issa doesn't run .. Bill Simon doesn't run."
APTN
Washington, DC - September 15, 2003
6. Walk in view of Darryl Issa
7. SOUNDBITE: (English) Congressman Darrell Issa, (Republican - California):
"In its decision to delay the recall election the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals attempts a judicial hijacking of the electoral process. A panel of three liberal judges, all appointed by Democrats are asking us to believe that the very voting systems that were used in the last election to elect Gray Davis aren't good enough to remove Gray Davis."
8. Mid view Issa speaking to reporters
9. SOUNDBITE: (English) Congressman Darrell Issa (Republican - California):
"You know the people of California - 1.2million plus - have asked for this election. One thing that people need to be aware of is Californians have already voted. Everyday absentee ballots are coming back now. People have already cast their votes. They would be disenfranchised if this was delayed or overturned."
POOL
Los Angeles, California - September 15, 2003
10. Wide view of ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) news conference
11. SOUNDBITE: (English) Ben Wizner, ACLU spokesman:
"I want to reinforce, as we have reinforced before that the American Civil Liberties Union takes no position on the recall. Whether there should be a recall, whether the Governor ought to be recalled and who his replacement ought to be. We have no idea who this opinion will benefit - whether it will benefit one side or another. But we do know is that voters in six counties, who comprise 44 per cent of California's electorate, will be the winners here and all Californians will be the winners here because the election will be fair and all votes will be afforded equal weight and dignity."
APTN
12. SOUNDBITE: (English) Vox Pop:
"Well I don't think we should be doing it at all, period. I feel that you get what you get and that we shouldn't have a recall."
13. SOUNDBITE: (English) Vox Pop:
"Its going to help him - he will have more time to campaign."
15. Mid view streets
STORYLINE:
A United States Federal appeals court postponed the October 7 California Governor's recall election Monday in a decision that threw an already chaotic campaign into utter turmoil.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not set a new date, but ruled that the election cannot proceed as scheduled because some votes would be cast using outmoded punch-card ballot machines.
The decision applies to all the recall questions on the ballot, as well as two propositions.
The court, the nation's largest and most liberal federal appeals court, withheld ordering the immediate implementation of its decision by a week to allow time for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Governor Gray Davis said he expected the case to go to a higher court.
Davis, speaking after appearing with former President Bill Clinton said: "This recall has been like a roller coaster. There are more surprises than you can possibly imagine."
He added that he would continue to make his case to the people that a recall is not good for the state.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/d08d43ca2127ed72e6bb0050a59f0bd7
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
1:40
Appeals court clears militant leader of treason
1. Wide shot of Islamic militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir inside prison compound
2. Variou...
published:21 Jul 2015
Appeals court clears militant leader of treason
Appeals court clears militant leader of treason
1. Wide shot of Islamic militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir inside prison compound
2. Various shots of Bashir, supporters and media
3. SOUNDBITE (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"In our opinion, (this is) already, you know something like, against the law. We call it unlawful detention. So we will protest it."
4. Cameraman
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Mahendratta, Bashir Lawyer:
"Abu Bakar Bashir, of course, now demands his right to be released. Because he agrees with us that he is put in detention without any legal ground."
6. Bashir returning to his prison cell
7. SOUNDBITE: (Indonesian) Fauzan, Bashir supporter:
"He (Bashir) is being treated with incredible injustice by the law of this country. Today in the name of law, he must be released. But there might be outside forces which influence the law."
8. Wide shot of prison compound
STORYLINE
An Indonesian appeals court cleared militant leader Abu Bakar Bashir of treason and reduced his sentence from four years to three, court officials said on Monday.
The Jakarta High Court upheld Bashir's conviction on lesser charges of forging identity documents.
Bashir was convicted in September of treason for involvement in a plot to overthrow Indonesia's secular government, but cleared of charges of being the leader of the al-Qaida linked Southeast Asia terror group Jemaah Islamiyah.
Prosecutors had demanded he serve 15 years.
The decision was widely criticised by foreign governments who maintain that Bashir is the spiritual head of the group, which has been blamed for both last year's Bali bombings that killed 202 people and the August 5 bombing of the Marriott hotel in Jakarta that killed 12.
The ruling, which was made last month but only revealed on Monday, could re-ignite criticism that Indonesia is treating Bashir too leniently.
The 65-year-old cleric is the most visible proponent of Islamic militancy in the country, even though he has repeatedly denied any involvement in terrorism.
A senior court official speaking on condition of anonymity said on Monday that the court had thrown out the treason conviction because there was not enough evidence to support the charge.
A Bashir defence lawyer said his team was not satisfied with the ruling and wanted all charges dropped.
Both the defence and state prosecutors said they would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
Bashir was arrested shortly after the Bali attack amid intense pressure on Indonesia to crack down on extremism.
He was not charged with involvement in either the Bali or Marriott attacks.
Treason, though a capital offence in many countries, is not always punishable by death or long prison sentences in Indonesia.
Bashir fled to Malaysia in the 1980s to escape a crackdown on militants by former dictator Suharto.
He founded a religious boarding school in central Java that was attended by several militants convicted in the Bali blasts.
Bashir and his followers have long sought to establish an Islamic state in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country.
In recent jailhouse speeches, the cleric said he disapproves of recent terror attacks but "respects" those who carried them out.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/ad5180e46874fd0eed55b41107bf1ad2
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
3:20
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Bali bomber
NB: wrong slate on tape, story correct
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
1. Wide exterior of I...
published:21 Jul 2015
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Bali bomber
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Bali bomber
NB: wrong slate on tape, story correct
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
1. Wide exterior of Indonesia's Supreme Court
2. Sign of the Court
3. Mid shot of Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto talking to journalists
4. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Toton Suprapto, Supreme Court judge:
"We have made a decision in this case to uphold the ruling of both District and High courts. The Supreme Court found no misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
5. Exterior pan of Supreme Court
6. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"We will immediately suggest to Amrozi to file for judicial review to the court because, at the moment, we are also complaining about the charges against our client to the Commission of the Constitution."
File - Bali, May 2003
7. Various of Amrozi bin Nurhasyim in court
Jakarta, 7 January 2004
8. SOUNDBITE: (Bahasa Indonesia), Mahendratta, Amrozi's lawyer:
"According to case statistics at the Supreme Court, this case was decided very quickly, unlike other cases in court. There are special things we need to question here and finding why it is so."
File - Bali, May 2003
9.Various shots of Amrozi in court
STORYLINE:
Indonesia's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a militant sentenced to death for planning and carrying out the 2002 Bali bombings, a court spokesman said on Wednesday.
Amrozi bin Nurhasyim was the first of the 29 militants convicted in the attack to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The bombings killed 202 people, mostly foreign tourists.
Amrozi's lawyers said they had yet to be informed of the verdict, but would file a judicial review of the case with the Supreme Court - a process that could take months or years.
Amrozi, dubbed the smiling assassin after he joked with police about the October 12, 2002, blasts after his arrest, has never shown any remorse for the attack, which was blamed on the al-Qaida linked Jemaah Islamiyah terror group.
A spokesman for the Supreme Court said a three-judge panel threw out Amrozi's appeal, which was filed just over three months ago.
Supreme Court judge Toton Suprapto said the pannel of judges didn't find any "misinterpretation of laws or mishandling during the investigation of this case."
Amrozi was sentenced to death in August last year.
Two other militants, including Amrozi's older brother Ali Gufron, have also been sentenced to death for planning and carrying out the attack.
They have also filed appeals at the Supreme Court.
Twenty-six others have been sentenced to between three years to life in connection with the attack.
Most of them are also appealing through Indonesia's legal system.
In their appeal, Amrozi's lawyers had argued that he did not deserve the death sentence because he was a minor player in the attack.
They also questioned the legality of retroactively applying a new anti-terror law passed after the Bali attack.
A judicial review requires new evidence to be submitted before it is heard.
If the Supreme Court rejects the review, then Amrozi's final chance to avoid execution would be appealing directly to the president for clemency.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/802bfd11a56ba965226ed3e1f97e465d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
2:09
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
Washington, DC - December 18, 2003
1. Various of ruling from federal appeals court in San...
published:21 Jul 2015
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
US court says Guantanamo inmates should have access to lawyers
Washington, DC - December 18, 2003
1. Various of ruling from federal appeals court in San Francisco
New York, New York - December 18, 2003
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very bad day for the (US) administration but it is a very good day for the (US) Constitution. Our federal courts are asserting their own authority to serve as independent checks on executive power, even during times of national security."
3. Close-up of court ruling
4. SOUNDBITE: (English) Fiona Doherty, Lawyers Committee For Human Rights:
"Well it is a very important ruling. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said that US courts do have jurisdiction to hear claims brought on behalf of those detained at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Approximately 660 individuals are detained there currently and the administration has been arguing that US courts do not have jurisdiction because Guantanamo Bay does not constitute sovereign US territory. But, under the terms of the perpetual lease signed by the United States and Cuba in 1903, the United States, although it does not have sovereignty, has complete jurisdiction and control under the terms of the lease. And the 9th Circuit says, under these conditions, that is sufficient and that US courts do have jurisdiction to hear the Guantanamo detainees' claims because, frankly, there are no other courts that could hear the claims, the U-S courts are their only recourse."
Guantanamo Bay - November 2003
5. Various of Camp Delta
STORYLINE:
A US federal appeals court ruled on Thursday for the first time that prisoners held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, should have access to lawyers and the American court system.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' two to one decision was a rebuke to the Bush administration, which maintains that because the 660 men held there were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charges or trial.
The US Supreme Court last month agreed to decide whether the detainees, picked up in Afghanistan and Pakistan, should have access to the courts.
The justices agreed to hear that case after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the prisoners had no rights to the American legal system.
The San Francisco appeals court, ruling on Thursday on a petition from a relative of a Libyan the U.S. military captured in Afghanistan, said the Bush administration's indefinite detention of the men runs contrary to American ideals.
A spokeswoman from the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Fiona Doherty, said although it was a bad day for the Bush administration it was a good day for the Constitution.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/bcaa482271805511b09aff8f15f3b33d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
2:09
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
1. Exterior court house where tribunal held
2. Journalists inside awaiting verdict
3. Cl...
published:21 Jul 2015
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
French court approves extradition of Italian leftist
1. Exterior court house where tribunal held
2. Journalists inside awaiting verdict
3. Close up sign "court of appeal"
4. Various of people walking up stairs towards courtroom
5. Close up policeman
6. People waiting outside courtroom
7. People coming out after ruling, pro-Battisti woman shouting her protest
8. SOUNDBITE: (French) Yves Cochet, French Green Party member of parliament:
"This judgement is of course absolutely iniquitous and we regret this decision. I think that France is selling itself short. It was, is and we hope it always will be a place of refuge and of human rights, and so it has to show it."
9. People leaving court
10. Various of pro-Battisti supporters outside the court, lying on ground as protest, chanting and singing songs, police standing by
11. Tilt up supporters to courthouse
STORYLINE:
A French court on Wednesday ruled in favour of extraditing an Italian leftist wanted for murder who escaped from prison in the 1980s to make a quiet new life as a writer in France.
It was not immediately clear whether Cesare Battisti plans to appeal to the Court of Cassation, France's highest appeals court.
He also has the option of appealing to the Council of State.
French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin has the final say on any extradition.
There were cries of protest inside the courtroom after the ruling was announced, although Battisti himself made no statement.
Left-wing sympathisers held a street protest outside the Palais de Justice, blocking traffic.
Heavily armed riot police stood by to maintain order.
Yves Cochet, a Paris lawmaker from the left-wing Greens party, said he intends to ask President Jacques Chirac to stop the extradition.
Battisti's case has become a cause celebre for liberal French intellectuals opposed to France's decision to end a two-decade asylum policy that kept him and other Italian leftist activists safe.
In May, a prosecutor recommended Battisti's extradition.
Battisti, a former member of the group Armed Proletarians for Communism, escaped from an Italian prison in 1981, fleeing to Mexico before settling in France in the early 1990s.
He was convicted in absentia and sentenced to life in prison in Italy in 1990 for two murders dating to 1978 and 1979, and he is accused of having a role as an accomplice in two other murders in 1979.
In France, Battisti wrote police thrillers and joined a community of dozens of Italians protected from extradition.
They considered themselves safe after the late Socialist President Francois Mitterrand vowed in 1985 to shelter Italian leftist militants who "embarked on a second phase of their lives (and) integrated themselves into French society."
Most of the fugitives fled Italy during the turbulent era in the 1970s and 1980s when militants on the left and right carried out killings and bombings aimed at bringing down the regime.
France was proud of its tradition as a haven for political refugees and disapproved of Italy's use of mass arrests and informants to combat extremists.
But after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the policy left France's government vulnerable to criticism that it wasn't doing enough to fight terrorism.
In 2002, Paolo Persichetti, a fugitive member of the terrorist group, was extradited to Italy to serve a 22-and-a-half year prison sentence for the 1987 death of an Italian general.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/918fe396e438853a20c0b63ea3bb2f1d
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
1:52
Court rules Pinochet was aware of abuses
1. Appellate Court door sign
2. Various FILE pictures of Former Chilean dictator General ...
published:21 Jul 2015
Court rules Pinochet was aware of abuses
Court rules Pinochet was aware of abuses
1. Appellate Court door sign
2. Various FILE pictures of Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet
3. SOUNDBITE: (Spanish) Emilio Cheyre, Chilean Armed Forces Commander:
"The speculations about General Pinochet are hurtful. I know first hand of his worsening physical condition, of his suffering, of his notable lack of ability in many aspects."
4. FILE of Pinochet walking
5. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Pablo Rodriguez, Pinochet's attorney:
"Going out for a walk or to a restaurant doesn't mean that you are capable of facing a judicial process. It is one thing to defend yourself in a court of law and another to go out on the street for a walk or to buy a book. It is absurd to link both things. In fact, Minister Ballestero says so after analysing the interview granted by Mr Pinochet. He says that he is indeed in a very bad situation."
6. FILE of Pinochet
7. SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Eduardo Contreras, Prosecuting Attorney:
"Supposedly Augusto Pinochet is in no condition to remember anything, such as dates. He supposedly has no long term or short term memory. What is absurd is to think that someone can buy history books, speak to the attendant at the bookstore about dates, conduct commercial transactions. This is another insult to the the public and to the Supreme Court. Purchasing books is a provocation and we will incorporate this into our case."
8. FILE of Pinochet
9. House where Pinochet lives
STORYLINE:
Former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet was fully aware of human rights abuses committed under his rule and did nothing to prevent them, according to the text of a Chilean court decision made public on Wednesday.
The May 28 ruling by the Santiago Court of Appeals was in favour of stripping Pinochet of his immunity from prosecution - something he enjoys as a former president.
Although the court's decision to strip Pinochet of his immunity was immediately made public on May 28, the full text of the decision wasn't released until Wednesday when the court said it believed Pinochet knew of repression under his rule.
Pinochet "knew perfectly well" what the security service was doing, "and was in a position to prevent the abuses, given its high authority," the ruling said.
The ruling increased the possibility that the 88-year-old former strongman will be tried for abuses during his 1973-90 reign.
The security service was commanded by General Manuel Contreras, a close associate of Pinochet.
Contreras, now retired, has served prison terms in various human rights cases, including the 1976 assassination in Washington of Orlando Letelier, a prominent Pinochet foe.
Pinochet's defence lawyers say they will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, which in the past has dropped charges against Pinochet because of his health.
According to a 2001 report by court-appointed doctors, Pinochet suffers from mild dementia and has sustained at least three mild strokes since 1998.
In addition, he suffers from diabetes and arthritis, and has been given a pacemaker.
The Supreme Court has ruled that Pinochet's health makes him unfit to stand trial.
The Santiago Court of Appeals voted 14-9 in favour of trying Pinochet for his role in the killing or disappearance of 19 Chilean dissidents in Argentina and Paraguay - part of the so-called Operation Condor which was a repression coordination plan implemented by the region's military dictatorships in the 1970s and 1980s.
The court ruling came after relatives of the victims sued Pinochet.
Lawyers said the ruling was prompted in part by Pinochet's appearance in a November 2003 interview with a Miami Spanish-language television station.
During the interview, he appeared healthy and lucid, although he was holding a cane and spoke with slurred words.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/c9c46ce591e2c5a0d1bb13879806d2c0
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
3:18
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
1. Exterior Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Matthieu Reeb,...
published:21 Jul 2015
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
Appeals panel overturns results of three day event
1. Exterior Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
2. SOUNDBITE: (English) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General, Court of Arbitration for Sport CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition, so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has been upheld by CAS, so it has decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury should be reinstated as well."
3. SOUNDBITE: (French) Matthieu Reeb, Secretary General CAS
"Today the Court of Arbitration for Sport has rendered its decision in the case of the equestrian competition so the appeal filed by the British, French and US Olympic committee has committee has been upheld by CAS, so it means decided to declare null and void the decision made by the appeal committee of the FEI. As a consequence, the decision made by the grand jury of the FEI has been reinstated, so the consequence is that the rankings established by the decision of the grand jury on the 18th of August should be reinstated as well."
4. Set up of presser
5. SOUNDBITE: (English) Will Connell, Equestrian Team Manager, Great Britain
"It was the right decision. It's perhaps a shame that we had to go to CAS. It wasn't about winning medals through the back door, it was about doing the best for our athletes, about the integrity of sport, about fair play. And I think our equestrian world is a very close community. The athletes have a lot of sympathy for Bettina, but at the end of the day she made a very silly mistake that all the riders are told very early on in their career not to make, and at the Olympic games the sport must be run within the rules and that is a great shame for the German team, but I believe very strongly that the British team deserved silver and Lesley, who has so often been the bridesmaid, deserved that fabulous gold medal, and Pipper the bronze."
6. Wide shot of presser
STORYLINE:
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) at the Athens Olympics has ruled in favour of France, Great Britain and the United States against an earlier decision that gave victory to Germany in the three-day equestrian team event.
The ruling on Saturday means Germany drops to fourth while France captures gold, Britain gets silver and the United States takes the bronze.
Initially, the judges gave Germany the gold and France the silver, while Britain took bronze.
But the same officials, concerned that Germany's Bettina Hoy might have crossed the start line twice on the show-jumping course, then docked Germany 14 points, dropping it from first place to fourth with 147.8 points in a decision that lifted the United States to third.
Germany then lodged a protest and an equestrian appeals committee reversed the judges' decision and the Germans reclaimed their gold. Again, France was awarded the silver and Britain the bronze, with the United States left empty-handed.
The appeal submitted by the three countries to CAS challenged whether the equestrian appeal committee had the jurisdiction to overturn the judges' decision.
The CAS panel sits on the second floor of the downtown Holiday Inn, where arbitrators are on call 24 hours a day to conduct hearings to settle disputes that will determine Olympic history.
CAS, an independent body, has set up shop in Athens to deal with doping, eligibility and other appeals on short notice to keep the games from getting bogged down in protests.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/0557fcc685c00146b5eabf5b2c27cca5
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
2:56
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
SHOTLIST
1. Various exteriors of Court of Appeal
2. Police outside the court
3. Media ...
published:21 Jul 2015
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
Appeal in case of former French prime minister for embezzlement
SHOTLIST
1. Various exteriors of Court of Appeal
2. Police outside the court
3. Media pack surrounding one of the defendants
4. Defendant arriving
5. Various of lawyers and defendants arriving
6. Various of Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arriving in a car
7. Juppe getting out of car
8. Cameras, pan to Juppe's lawyer Jean-Rene Farthouat (on the left) standing outside the court
9. Juppe leaving court and getting into a car
10. Car driving away
11. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Rene Farthouat, former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe's lawyer:
"Listen, he (Juppe) kept his promise to explain himself as well as he could. He said a number of things. You heard them, like I did, in the courtroom and you can draw a certain number of conclusions from it. It's clear. (Reporter question: He admits he wasn't vigilant enough?). He admits he wasn't vigilant enough (Reporter question: And that he was aware of it?) That's not at all what he said."
12. Car driving away
13. SOUNDBITE: (French) Jean-Pierre Mignard, lawyer for the city of Paris:
(Reporter question: What was the difference with Juppe's behaviour in the previous trial?)
"Perhaps in fact emphasising a lack of attention, lack of vigilance, perhaps but I think that's not enough. (Reporter question: What else is needed?) To admit to it. I think that when you were the prime minister of the French Republic, serving the Republic, then you should admit. That is grandeur. I think the country would appreciate it. (Reporter question: Anything else he should do?) I have nothing else to say."
14. Exterior of court building
STORYLINE
Former French Prime Minister Alain Juppe arrived at an appeals court in Versailles on Wednesday to fight a conviction that could end his political career.
Juppe, once seen as a potential successor to French President Jacques Chirac, admitted to the court to "errors, even faults" but said he did not intend to break the law.
He added that he had been "deeply shaken" by his January conviction for his role in a political financing scandal.
The 59-year-old hopes to overturn a suspended 18-month prison sentence that carried an additional 10-year ban from elected office.
His appeal hearing is expected to last at least until October 29.
Juppe was convicted for an illegal party funding scheme while he served as finance director at Paris City Hall during Chirac's tenure as mayor, from 1977 to 1995.
The verdict was an embarrassment to Chirac and, in shattering Juppe's political future, appeared to rob the president of a close ally who was widely seen as his favourite to succeed him.
The next elections are in 2007, and Chirac has not said if he will seek a third term.
Should Chirac leave office or be voted out, he would lose the presidential immunity which has protected him from questioning in this financing scandal and others.
In convicting Juppe, judges sanctioned a system of political financing in place under Chirac's watch at Paris City Hall.
City funds were used to pay personnel of Chirac's Rally for the Republic party, the UMP's predecessor. Bogus city jobs were created to hide the source of funding.
Juppe said the fake jobs system was commonly used by political parties and unions for 20 years.
Juppe was by far the most prominent of six defendants who went before the court in Versailles, west of Paris, on appeal.
Chirac has given fervent backing to Juppe since the conviction.
Their relationship dates to the 1970s, when Chirac contracted Juppe as his speechwriter. Juppe served as Chirac's first prime minister from 1995-1997.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/37591d5e86551952b2365bc1f4205bdf
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
published:21 Jul 2015
views:0
86:19
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
IP and Advocacy by Judge Alex Kozinski, former Chief Judge of the United States, Court of ...
published:21 Jul 2015
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
UCL IBIL | Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture 2015: IP and Advocacy with Judge Alex Kozinski
IP and Advocacy by Judge Alex Kozinski, former Chief Judge of the United States, Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Chaired by: The Rt Hon Professor Sir Robin Jacob, Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law, UCL Laws
About the speaker and the lecture
Judge Alex Kozinski was appointed to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in 1985 and was its Chief Judge from 2007 until 2014. He heard many IP cases (other than patents), the 9th Circuit including within it Hollywood and other creative centres.
In this lecture, Judge Kozinski talks about the challenge that IP cases present to judges. He speaks of its growing importance and explains why advocacy is so important in this field and how it can make a big difference. The talk explores several intellectual property cases to illustrate some lessons in effective advocacy. In particular, these cases illustrate the power of concrete examples – in particular, concrete images and sounds – which often persuade in a way that abstract legal arguments do not. The power of concrete examples is not limited to the courtroom. They can also be used to persuade the court of public opinion, where the stakes as regards IP are often higher.
At the end of this talk, students will have gained a profound insight into the importance of advocacy in IP cases and how to use concrete examples when they themselves are acting as advocates. They will also gain an insight into how an acute judicial mind assesses legal submissions.
Find out more about this lecture on our website at http://www.laws.ucl.ac.uk/event/ip-and-advocacy/
published:21 Jul 2015
views:2
1:12
Three Americans appeal against torture charges
1. National Security Appeals Court exterior
2. Various of Americans walking into court
3...
published:21 Jul 2015
Three Americans appeal against torture charges
Three Americans appeal against torture charges
1. National Security Appeals Court exterior
2. Various of Americans walking into court
3. Various of guards standing outside court
4. White van drives by with Americans inside
5. SOUNDBITE: (Pashtu) Mohammed Ismail Habed, Head of Appeals Court:
"We met the American prisoners today. It was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence."
6. Pen, eyeglasses and paper on table
STORYLINE:
Three Americans sentenced to eight to 10 years in jail for torturing Afghans on a freelance hunt for terror suspects began their appeal on Monday, despite the absence of their US lawyers.
Jonathan Idema, Brent Bennett and Edward Caraballo are seeking to overturn their convictions in a trial that embarrassed US and NATO forces and sowed confusion about America's role in Afghanistan.
Police brought the three in handcuffs to the office of Presiding Judge Mohammed Ismail Habed in downtown Kabul for a preliminary hearing, which was closed to the public.
Habed later told journalists: "it was a preliminary discussion because there was a need to hear each other and there was a need for some explanation. We gave them the evidence and now they have time to prepare their defence".
Four Afghans were also convicted as accomplices.
Habed had postponed the hearing for more than three weeks to allow time for the defendants' American lawyers to arrive in Kabul.
The hearing was supposed to set a date for the first full court session.
But Abdul Latif, one of a three-judge panel handling the case, said the absence of the defence team meant they could set no date for the first full
court session.
Idema, the group's leader, Bennett, his right-hand man, and television cameraman Caraballo were arrested in July when Afghan security forces raided a house in downtown Kabul and discovered eight Afghans who said they had been abused.
On September 15, a lower court convicted all three of running an illegal jail, torture and illegal entry into Afghanistan, after a trial marred by faulty translation and chaotic procedures.
Idema, a 48-year-old former soldier from Fayetteville, North Carolina, insists they were tracking down terror suspects, including al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, in close cooperation with American and Afghan security forces.
The US military acknowledges accepting a prisoner from Idema, but insists it realised shortly afterward that he was an impostor.
NATO peacekeepers also helped the accused on three raids, but said they later they had been duped.
You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/aa60669aa98b18028c602eb8498e0372
Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
The plane is reported to have belonged to an aviation firm owned by the family of the former al-Qaeda leader. The Saudi embassy in the UK has issued a statement offering condolences to the family, without confirming the identities of those killed. The statement, on Twitter, said the Saudi ambassador to Britain, Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdul Aziz, had paid his condolences to the family and relatives of the late Osama Bin Laden....
Myanmar's president has declared a state of emergency in four regions after heavy floods left 27 people dead. Monsoon rains over many weeks have led to flooding in most of the country (also known as Burma). Myanmar's PresidentThein Sein declared a state of emergency in four regions - Chin, Magwe, Sagaing and Rakhine ... The AFP agency quoted one director of the social welfare ministry as saying that "most of the country" was flooded....
Ralph Waldo Emerson had predicted if Indian people were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands “the name of the nation removed would be a stench to the world.”(1) After enduring centuries of sickness, near starvation, crippling cold, and loss of their ancestral homelands, the Choctaw again faced the very exact “stench to the world” that Emerson mentioned ... It also consists of an ongoing “living” genocide ... VoicesofIndian American....
New Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour called for unity in the movement Saturday in his first audio message since becoming head of the group that faces deepening splits following the death of longtime chief Mullah Omar...The Taliban also announced his deputies -- Sirajuddin Haqqani, who leads the Taliban-allied Haqqani network and has a $10 million US bounty on his head, and Haibatullah Akhundzada, former head of the Taliban courts....
Not one or two, the Centre has filed 32 writ appeals in the Madras high court after a single judge passed as many orders in favour of mining companies which have been accused of illegally carting away more than Rs 1 lakh crore worth rare earth minerals such as garnet, ilmenite, zircon, rutile and monazite so far ... Worse, as certified copies of the orders were given for about six months, the Centre could to file appeals in time....
Drake is currently a partner in the law firm ofStewart and Stewart, where her practice focuses on international trade law matters and where she advises clients on disputes before the World Trade Organization. In addition to practicing before the court to which she has been nominated, Drake also practices before the United StatesDepartment......
Hundreds of topless women joined the march ...Ontario passed legislation confirming the right of women to go topless in 1996, after the Ontario CourtofAppeal overturned a woman's conviction for removing her shirt. Gwen Jacobs had been fined in 1991, but on appeal the court found that there was "nothing degrading or dehumanising" about her going topless in public....
Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas said Friday he would appeal to the InternationalCriminalCourt to investigate the morning's arson attack in the Arab village ofDuma in Samaria that killed an infant and wounded four family members. Even though the identity of the attackers is not yet known, the IDF has said it suspects Jewish extremists were behind the attack due to Hebrew graffiti found at the site ... ....
NORMAN — The UniversityofOklahoma found Frank Shannon responsible for a sexual assault, suspended him for a year — after originally planning to expel him — and fought in court to keep him off campus ... In an Oklahoma SupremeCourt filing, OU’s lawyers wrote that Shannon’s suspension was important “to protect students and administrators from threats and/or perceived threats of harm.”....
WASHINGTON — The 49-cent stamp has eight more months of life until the U.S.Postal Service has to roll back the price, the effect of a ruling that allows the post office to collect $1.1 billion to cover its recession-related losses ...CourtofAppeals for the DistrictofColumbiaCircuit ruled in June that the rate hike should not become permanent....
When the league determined Brady was involved in the manipulating of air pressure in footballs used in New England's 45-7 rout of the Indianapolis Colts in the AFC championship game, it slapped the four-time Super Bowl winner with a four-game suspension that brought an immediate appeal by Brady and inflated the Patriots' Super Bowl odds to 7-1 at MGM....
2 August 2015... A woman whose seven-year-old son has vanished with her estranged husband is appealing for staff and customers of a coffee chain to be on the alert ... Ms Dad, who has launched family court proceedings in a bid to find her son, said she had spoken to Mani by telephone several times and he told her he had visited Costa with his father. "He loves Costa ... Her solicitor Katherine Res Pritchard, ofDawson Cornwell, said ... ....
Markets responded negatively to the statement in Moscow last week by OpecSecretary GeneralAbdullah al-Badri, after meeting the Russian Energy Minister Aleksandr Novak, indicating that no (Opec) output cut was in offing...ABN AMRO last week lowered it price forecast for Brent to average $65 in 2016 from its previous forecast of $75. JeffCurrieofGoldman Sachs is now setting a $45 a barrel target for WTI....
I've never understood the allure of hunting animals for kicks, whether it's offing a squirrel with a .22 or ripping into a big cat like Cecil with a crossbow. A lot ofAmericans don't get it, either. Over 735,000of them have signed a "Justice for Cecil" petition on change.org, urging punishment for those involved in Cecil's death (including the big-game tour guides Palmer hired to help hunt his prey)....
And the conspiracy theorist made national headlines this past week when a Seattlecourt heard his lawsuit against the city of Seattle and the Seattle Police Department...King’s CountySuperiorCourtJudge Theresa Doyle decided to throw out the suit and ruled in favor of the city, claiming that Lee had “improperly served his lawsuit to the city by not ......