JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Germanwings: Australian pilots wary of the new 'rule of two' for cockpit

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

How did Lubitz single-handedly down that plane?

The flight's voice recorder has revealed the co-pilot deliberately crashed the Germanwings plane. Disturbingly, it was post 9/11 cockpit safety procedures that helped him do it.

PT2M26S 620 349

A move to allow an "authorised person", rather than a flight attendant, to take the second seat in an airliner cockpit to comply with new aviation rules has raised additional security concerns among Australian pilots.

Qantas policies allow off-duty airline employees from all departments, regulatory officials and air traffic controllers to sit in the so-called "jump seat" during the flight, albeit only at the discretion of the pilot in command. They have all had extensive background checks, but not necessarily mental health checks, before sitting in the spare seat behind the pilots which does not have controls.

If one of those authorised people is in the jump seat, a flight attendant will not need to enter the cockpit when one pilot exits to use the toilet during the flight.

The new rules will allow a person in the jump seat behind the pilots' positions to serve as the second person in the cockpit.

The new rules will allow a person in the jump seat behind the pilots' positions to serve as the second person in the cockpit. Photo: Jim Rice

A Virgin Australia spokeswoman said the airline would ensure there were always two operational crew members on the flight deck at all times after having instructed flight attendants on how to operate the cockpit door. However, it is understood other "authorised persons" may be trained to perform that role over time.

As a result of the "rule of two" introduced after the apparently deliberate Germanwings crash in the French Alps last week, Australia will require all aircraft with capacity for more than 50 passengers to have two people on the flight deck at all times.

Infrastructure and Regional Development Minister Warren Truss on Monday said the second person would need to be a member of the operating crew or an "authorised person" like those allowed in the Qantas jump seat.

But he added the entire policy would be reviewed after 12 months to determine its effectiveness.

Before putting the new policy in place, Mr Truss had cautioned Australia needed to be careful not to introduce a different risk into the flight deck given flight attendants did not receive the same mental health checks as pilots.

In the Germanwings crash, flight captain Patrick Sondheimer reportedly banged on the door after returning from a toilet break but was refused entry by the first officer Andreas Lubitz, who was the only one on the flight deck at the time.

In Australia, jump seat passengers had not previously been briefed on how to open the cockpit door, but they will be now be told how to do so as a result of the new policy.

"There are so many holes in this ill-thought through rule," one Australian pilot said of the new policy.

"What if the captain leaves for the bathroom, an authorised person is in the jump seat and an attacker comes to the door, pounds on the door saying, 'This is the Captain. Let me in.' What do you think the authorised person will do?"

However, other sources said there were some security layers to prevent this type of unauthorised entry such as a peephole in the door and a video camera outside the door.

The pilot also raised concerns that a flight attendant or a passenger in the jump seat could reach the "crash axe" which is in the cockpit to assist in escape in the event of a crash but could also be used as a weapon.

"It exposes the cockpit to more security risks than the isolated case of a homicidal pilot," he said. "I think flight crew are a better judge of fellow pilots' mental state. Now I have to judge the cabin crew member's mental state too before leaving them in the cockpit with access to things like the crash axe."

A second Australian pilot said the new policy appeared to be a "knee-jerk reaction" to a one-off plane crash on the other side of the world. "It is not going to prevent anything," he said. "It is saying to pilots you can't be trusted."

In an email to pilots on Monday, Qantas chief operating officer Andrew David and group executive associated airlines and services John Gissing said it was important to acknowledge the Germanwings incident was as "isolated as it is tragic".

"The Qantas Group's safety system has been developed over many years of experience and is continually reviewed to make sure it's as strong as practically possible," they said.

19 comments so far

  • flight attendants did not receive the same mental health checks as pilots.

    Well no one receives the same health checks!
    But at least the flight attendents are trained to use the safety equipment in there, oxygen , fire extinguishers etc as oppose to "authorised persons" who just have a CASA ID or may be management with no relevent safety training.
    Any person in the flight deck or entering the flight deck has an opportunity to create a problem but realistically how many millions of flights have there been and how many times has there been an issue with mental health of flight crew.
    This reaction from most airlines wont actually fix any issues, but they will be seen to be doing something to restore the publics faith in an already safe system.
    I would assume that any person with a mental illness [if they are aware they have a problem that is] would be very good at hiding the symptoms if it meant they could keep flying.

    Commenter
    anon
    Date and time
    Tue Mar 31 01:43:19 UTC 2015
    • Put a toilet in the cockpit. That will shut them up.

      Commenter
      Steve
      Date and time
      Tue Mar 31 02:17:30 UTC 2015
      • Where are the statistics people when you need them. You know the ones who will tell you you have more chance of being stuck by lightening than killed by a shark?
        An airliner flight has been taking off and landing every second of the day somewhere in the world for I dont know how long, and how many of these flights have been deliberately crashed by the pilots? Less than a handful. Do the maths.

        Commenter
        AeroDave
        Date and time
        Tue Mar 31 02:40:10 UTC 2015
        • Surely if the pilot or co-pilot wanted to have a suicide mission as in the case of the Germanwings flight he would be likely to attack the other person in the cockpit. After all,on the recent disastrous flight he didn't consider the lives of anyone on board. All died.How easy would it have been for him to have used the crash axe on the pilot or, indeed,on any replacement crew member. Perhaps it is time to explore using the drone technology now available to allow ground control to override the plane's flight path in extraordinary corcumstances.

          Commenter
          owl
          Date and time
          Tue Mar 31 02:59:34 UTC 2015
          • Making policy based on a 1 in a million incident is bad policy

            Commenter
            Knee jerk
            Date and time
            Tue Mar 31 03:06:29 UTC 2015
            • It's a stupid rule that's been pushed through too fast without any industry consultation. Most (if not all) airlines allow employees to ride jump and have done for decades. If a suicidal pilot really wants to down an aircraft, they'll down the aircraft. The government needed to be seen as doing something so as to appease the ill-informed and they have chosen this solution.

              Commenter
              Ben
              Date and time
              Tue Mar 31 03:23:42 UTC 2015
              • The "two in the cockpit" is a knee-jerk reaction to the Germanwings crash as was the locking of the cockpit doors a knee-jerk reaction to 9/11. If security on the ground had done its job in the first place, none of these crashes would have happened. I have been an airline pilot for over 35 years and cannot remember one incidence of a suicide or one attemped, before the cockpit doors were locked. I can remember one attempted suicide by an "autorised person" in the cockpit with the operating crew so maybe that isn't the answer either. As captain I was reponsible for all members of my crew and I would resent any flight attendant baby-sitting me in the cockpit, assuming that they knew what they were monitoring while in the cockpit. Now retired, I would like to think that I could help if an emerhency happend but I would not be able to do so, being locked out of the cockpit in exactly the same way that the Germanwings captain was locked out. Maybe the answer is simple. A little more intelligent training of ground security staff and leave the cockpit door unlocked.

                Commenter
                Schroeder
                Date and time
                Tue Mar 31 03:32:09 UTC 2015
                • You hit the proverbial nail on the head. If the cockpit door could not be locked then the German wings disaster would not have happened.The job of security is to prevent any person from entering the aircraft with any sort of concealed weapon and hence make a hijacking all but impossible. Yet we are now faced with security staff taking away tubes of toothpaste because it exceeds 100 grams yet we allow pilots to lock doors with mental health issues who are ticking time bombs. The action by this co-pilot is totally abhorrent and must not be repeated. Leave cockpit doors unlocked at all times or at least have a fail safe system of unlocking in the event of an emergency such as what happened over the French alps. Two people in the cockpit is a 'touchy feely' stop gap measure. Iron clad security BEFORE passengers board the plane must be the solution.

                  Commenter
                  hg
                  Date and time
                  Tue Mar 31 08:57:59 UTC 2015
              • Why are commercial planes with less than 50 passengers exempt? What is the logic behind that?

                Are the collective lives of 50 or less people, less valuable or less at risk than
                150?

                Commenter
                East Coaster
                Date and time
                Tue Mar 31 04:19:06 UTC 2015
                • Simply because aircraft of this size usually don't have a lockable cabin door or the attendant already sits in the jump seat behind the pilots

                  Commenter
                  Bill
                  Location
                  Sydney
                  Date and time
                  Tue Mar 31 10:12:23 UTC 2015

              More comments

              Make a comment

              You are logged in as [Logout]

              All information entered below may be published.

              Error: Please enter your screen name.

              Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

              Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

              Error: Please enter your comment.

              Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

              Post to

              You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

              Thank you

              Your comment has been submitted for approval.

              Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

              Related Coverage

              Germanwings crash: Australian flight attendants welcome adoption of 'rule of two'

              Australia's move to mandate the presence of two airline staff in the cockpit of aircraft in the wake of the Germanwings crash has been welcomed by local flight attendants.

              'Rule of two': Australia to require two in a cockpit at all times in wake of Germanwings tragedy

              Australia will require airlines to have two crew members in the cockpit at all times as a safety precaution following the Germanwings crash which killed 150 passengers and crew last week.

              null How did Lubitz single-handedly down that plane?

              The flight's voice recorder has revealed the co-pilot deliberately crashed the Germanwings plane. Disturbingly, it was post 9/11 cockpit safety procedures that helped him do it.

              Germanwings co-pilot had suicidal tendencies

              nvestigators say the Germanwings co-pilot suspected of deliberately crashing a plane in the French Alps had been treated in the past for suicidal tendencies.

              Featured advertisers

              Special offers

              Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo

              Executive Style