Disability and social services links – 16 March

This is something I’m trying out – I’m aiming to get these out on Mondays, so if you spy something of interest, flick it my way at blunt.shovels [at] gmail.

How to make the ICT at your workplace work for people with disabilities.

There’s a big conference on this week in Melbourne about the NDIS that, ahem, is not exactly putting disabled people front and centre. Jax Jackie Brown has a bit to say (Facebook link) about this, and won in the end.

Are people with disabilities included in disaster planning? Kelly Vincent, the South Australian MP, has been doing some really interesting work around this.

Concerns about how the NDIS will fund aids and equipment.

How will the NDIS work with ‘people on the fringe‘ – for example, people with an intellectual disability, drug and alcohol issues and contact with the justice system.

Have your say on how quality should be measured within the NDIS – submission guidelines here.

The government response to the NSW inquiry into social housing (PDF) has been delayed until after the election.

VCOSS gets its priorities in before the first Victorian Labor budget.

Three charities are deregistered after an ACNC investigation. I wonder if Morrison is as committed to getting rid of this organisation as Andrews was?

Current inquiries going on by the community affairs committee and the transcripts from estimates from the most recent sessions are now up.

Posted in Disability links | Tagged , | Leave a comment

All about able women

There is something special about being ignored. About being looked past, or over. A pang, that almost tastes like shame, for apologetically asking for a crumb. A seat at the table.

On March 8, there is an event on in Sydney. It’s being widely publicised on radio and tickets are nearly sold out. All About Women sells itself as a space to discuss a range of topics among some impressive women. Lots of people I know are going. I’m not.

In January, I asked the organisers about the accessibility of the venue and the event, if there were any panels discussing disability or if any of the presenters were women with a disability. In response, I was told that the curators would email me, and that they hadn’t asked any of the panellists to disclose whether they had a disability or not.

Hmm, I wonder what this means? Is it that disability is something shameful that women are meant to hide? What does that mean for disabled women who have a visible disability? Surely I am meant to be all women-power positive about my body, even this broken one?

I wondered how they could dismiss the one in five women who have a disability. I wondered if they knew any of the kick-arse disabled women I knew, and start collecting a list, just to be helpful. Women who work in advocacy, women with experiences of living in institutions, women who use wheelchairs or sign language, women who write, women who dream, women who love. Surely I was mistaken, and I would hear from the curators before too long.

I was told I needed to ask about accessibility in private, out of the public eye. Perhaps I am not part of the public? A disabled woman couldn’t possibly be made welcome by publicising how easy it would be for her to take part. That was quickly fixed, but I wondered why it had taken some minor Facebook agitation to make it happen.

I emailed again, just in case they hadn’t received my first email. I thought of the amazing contributions disabled women would make to a panel session or two. They might raise all the tricky bits of the abortion conversation that we don’t have very often, or the high numbers of disabled women impacted by domestic violence. They might speak about what it’s like to be sterilised against their will or to have their children removed because they have a disability.

They might talk about the 90% of women with intellectual disabilities who have been abused and a justice system that won’t even prosecute cases, despite the evidence. They could talk about poverty and employment and life in institutions.

They could talk about the art they make, the music they are part of or the theatre and films they create. They would make you laugh and cry and never say ‘you’re so inspiring’ ever again.

So I waited for my email from the curators, because surely this was an oversight and I was mistaken in thinking they didn’t care. Surely this was not another door closing, instead of opening. But I guess I was wrong. The email never arrived.

Disabled women are not a fringe group, or an afterthought – with up to 20% of us having a disability, not putting our issues on the agenda says clearly that you don’t think they are important.

We are not an afterthought. We have a right to be at the table with everyone else. All About Women has proven that this is not a table I care to sit at.

Posted in disability, feminism | Tagged , , | 10 Comments