The Truth exposed about China's false claims China loves to claim possession of Tibet because of the Yuan, Ming & Qing Dynasties. The maps in the video clearly show China's reach during each dynasty. The 2 Dynasties that over took Tibet are the Yuan and the Qing Dynasty. Below will be additional links to other sites showing these dynasties. But first lets deal with the Tang Dynasty. The Tang Dynasty ran from 618 - 906 AD. China never gained more then a foothold in Tibet along the borders as shown in the map in video. On the other hand in 763 Tibet not only sacked the Tang capital of Hangman for a short period and parts of Tang areas for about 60 years. the quote below is in the Military And Foreign Policy first section 3rd paragraph down. Below the quote are 2 links first is to the treaty translated into English and second is to the stone pillar mentioned at the end of the quote. http://www.museumstuff.com/learn/topi... "There was a long string of conflicts with Tibet over territories in the Tarim Basin between 670-692 and in 763 the Tibetans even captured the capital of China, Chang'an, for fifteen days during the An Shi Rebellion. In fact, it was during this rebellion that the Tang withdrew its western garrisons stationed in what is now Gansu and Qinghai, which the Tibetans then occupied along with the territory of what is now Xinjiang. Hostilities between the Tang and Tibet continued until they signed a formal peace treaty in 821. The terms of this treaty, including the fixed borders between the two countries, are recorded in a bilingual inscription on a stone pillar outside the Jokhang temple in Lhasa." http://www.tibetjustice.org/materials... "Both Tibet and China shall keep the country and frontiers of which they are now in possession. The whole region to the east of that being the country of Great Tibet, from either side of that frontier there shall be no warfare, no hostile invasions, and no seizure of territory." http://tibet.prm.ox.ac.uk/photo_2001.... The Dynasty that the Chinese first claim gives them possession of Tibet is the Yuan Dynasty. Well lets see here is a Chinese tourist site with a map of this era. http://www.chinatouristmaps.com/china... note the Chinese site not me clearly states that the Yuan Dynasty was ruled by Mongols. So how can the Chinese claim possession of Tibet when they in fact were not even in control of China? Chinese also love to try and claim the Ming Dynasty gave them possession of Tibet. The maps clearly show otherwise plus if they gained possession in the Yuan Dynasty, why the need to say the same thing in the Ming and following Qing dynasties? Did they not already have possession? Obviously not. http://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro... "Meanwhile, the Qing court resumed the 'Sheng' administrative system that originated in the Yuan Dynasty (1271 - 1368). Especially, in the frontiers like Tibet, Xinjiang, Mongol and Taiwan Island, the Qing court set out to enhance the power of the imperial ruling." As previously explained in the Yuan section China was not even in control of the Qing period it was controlled under the Manchurian people http://www.warriortours.com/intro/his... "As the last feudal dynasty in Chinese history drew to a close, the Qing Dynasty was established by the Manchu People (Nuzhen People). It lasted 268 years, having altogether 11 emperors in addition to the ruling Emperor Taizong Huang Taiji in Shenyang." So once again China had no control over itself so it has no claim to Tibet in the Qing Dynasty either. Since when does a subject have the power to claim something in the possession of the master? Following the fall of the Qing Dynasty Mongolia and Tibet both declared their independence again and signed a mutual treaty recognizing each other as independent and allies http://www.tibetjustice.org/materials... Articles 1 & 2 No person would think that the USA had a claim to take possession of Canada because both were once under England's control or to lay claim to the whole of Mexico, Central America and South America because all these were in whole or in part under Spanish control. Claims like this would be considered ridiculous and without merit. Well China's claim on Tibet because of 2 periods of time when China itself was an occupied country are just as ridiculous.

• published: 21 Oct 2013
• views: 36