Indian Penal Code

Open Collage in a new Window

INDIAN PENAL CODE (basic) by D.K.DUBEY (IPC)

Duration: 61:03
Updated: 02 Sep 2014

http://dkdubey.webs.com/ CONTACT FOR ONLINE LAW CLASS BY Dr.D.K.DUBEY AT +91 9336207092.

http://wn.com/INDIAN_PENAL_CODE_(basic)_by_D.K.DUBEY_(IPC)

Play Fullscreen

IPC part1

Duration: 24:55
Updated: 01 Sep 2014

Prof. H.P. Deshmukh's lecture series on The Indian Penal Code (IPC)

http://wn.com/IPC_part1

Play Fullscreen

IPC upto Section 75 : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 16:43
Updated: 30 Aug 2014

Sections Details Introduction Preamble Chapter I Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 Title and extent of operation of the Code Punish...

http://wn.com/IPC_upto_Section_75_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

Indian Penal Code -Video 1

Duration: 8:54
Updated: 03 Sep 2014

Online Coaching Class for all states Higher Judicial Services Examination, Civil Judge Junior Division Exam and various public prosecution officers exams suc...

http://wn.com/Indian_Penal_Code_-Video_1

Play Fullscreen

INDIAN PENAL CODE PART 2.1 (IPC) AT DELHI BY D K DUBEY ENGLISH

Duration: 33:38
Updated: 31 Aug 2014

mail us on alawmagic@gmail.com.

http://wn.com/INDIAN_PENAL_CODE_PART_2.1_(IPC)_AT_DELHI_BY_D_K_DUBEY_ENGLISH

Play Fullscreen

IPC BY D K DUBEY AT NEW DELHI INDIAN PENAL CODE 2.2 MEN REA

Duration: 29:15
Updated: 09 Apr 2014

mail us on alawmagic@gmail.com.

http://wn.com/IPC_BY_D_K_DUBEY_AT_NEW_DELHI_INDIAN_PENAL_CODE_2.2_MEN_REA

Play Fullscreen

IPC Defamation (S.499-502) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 9:46
Updated: 13 Sep 2014

CHAPTER XXI - OF defamation 499. Defamation — Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person. Explanation 1 —It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives. Explanation 2 —It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such. Explanation 3 —An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation. Explanation 4 —No imputation is said to harm a person’s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful. First Exception —Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.—It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact. Second Exception—Public conduct of public servants.—It is not defamation to express in a good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further. Third Exception — Conduct of any person touching any public question.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further. Fourth Exception — Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.—It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings. Explanation —A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section. Fifth Exception.—Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further. Sixth Exception—Merits of public performance.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further. Seventh Exception —Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another —It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates. Eight Exception —Accusation preferred in good faith to authorised person.—It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation. Ninth Exception—Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interests.—It is not defamation to make an impu 500. Punishment for defamation — Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. 501. Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory — 502. Sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter.

http://wn.com/IPC_Defamation_(S.499-502)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Definitions of Culpable Homicide, Murder (S.299-300) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 14:46
Updated: 10 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XVI - OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY Of Offences affecting Life 299. Culpable homicide — (a) A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpable homicide. (b) A knows Z to be behind a bush. B does not know it A, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely to cause Z’s death, induces B to fire at the bush. B fires and kills Z. Here B may be guilty of no offence; but A has committed the offence of culpable homicide. (c) A, by shooting at a fowl with intent to kill and steal it, kills B who is behind a bush; A not knowing that he was there. Here, although A was doing an unlawful act, he was not guilty of culpable homicide, as he did not intend to kill B, or to cause death by doing an act that he knew was likely to cause death. Explanation I — A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death. Explanation 2 — Where death is caused by bodily injury, the person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused the death, although by resorting to proper remedies and skilful treatment the death might have been prevented. Explanation 3 — The causing of the death of child in the mother’s womb is not homicide. But it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child, if any part of that child has been brought forth, though the child may not have breathed or been completely born. 300. Murder — Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or— Secondly — If it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or— Thirdly — If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or— Fourthly — If the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid. Exception 1 —When culpable homicide is not murder.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation, causes the death of the person who gave the provocation or causes the death of any other person by mistake or accident. The above exception is subject to the following provisos: — First — That the provocation is not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for killing or doing harm to any person. Secondly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant. Thirdly — That the provocation is not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence. Explanation — Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from amounting to murder is a question of fact. Exception 2 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, in the exercise in good faith of the right of private defence of person or property, exceeds the power given to him by law and causes the death of the person against whom he is exercising such right of defence without premeditation, and without any intention of doing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence. Exception 3 — Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, being a public servant or aiding a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers given to him by law, and causes death by doing an act which he, in good faith, believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant and without ill-will towards the person whose death is caused. Exception 4 — Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.

http://wn.com/IPC_Definitions_of_Culpable_Homicide,_Murder_(S.299-300)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Theft (S.378-382) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 12:05
Updated: 11 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XVII - OF OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY Of Theft 378. Theft — Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft. Explanation 1 — A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being movable property, is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth. Explanation 2 — A moving effected by the same act which affects the severance may be a theft. Explanation 3 — A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented it from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it. Explanation 4 — A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal. Explanation 5 —The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied, and may be given either by the person in possession, or by any person having for the purpose authority either express or implied. (j) If A owes money to Z for repairing the watch, and if Z retains the watch lawfully as a security for the debt, and A takes the watch out of Z’s possession, with the intention of depriving Z of the property as a security for his debt, he commits theft, in as much as he takes it dishonestly. (k) Again, if A, having pawned his watch to Z, takes it out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent, not having paid what he borrowed on the watch, he commits theft, though the watch is his own property in as much as he takes it dishonestly. (l) A takes an article belonging to Z out of Z’s possession, without Z’s consent, with the intention of keeping it until he obtains money from Z as a reward for its restoration. Here A takes dishonestly; A has therefore committed theft. (m) A, being on friendly terms with Z, goes into Z’s library in Z’s absence, and takes away a book without Z’s express consent for the purpose merely of reading it, and with the intention of returning it. Here, it is probable that A may have conceived that he had Z’s implied consent to use Z’s book. If this was A’s impression, A has not committed theft. 379. Punishment for theft — Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. 380. Theft in dwelling house, etc.— 381. Theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of master — 382. Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to the committing of the theft — (a) A commits theft on property in Z’s possession; and, while committing this theft, he has a loaded pistol under his garment, having provided this pistol for the purpose of hurting Z in case Z should resist. A has committed the offence defined in this section.

http://wn.com/IPC_Theft_(S.378-382)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC General Exception upto Section 95 : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 11:03
Updated: 30 Aug 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Section 76 to 95 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact...

http://wn.com/IPC_General_Exception_upto_Section_95_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

This Day That Year: In 1860 Indian Penal Code passed into law

Duration: 1:31
Updated: 06 Oct 2014

--- On this day in the year 1762, Battle of Manila between Britain and Spain concluded. --- It was on this day in the year 1860 that Indian Penal Code was passed into law. --- On 6th of October 1927, the first prominent talking movie, The Jazz Singer was opened. --- On this day in the year 1949, the foundation stone for the National Defence Academy was laid by the then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. --- It was on this day in the year 1956 that Dr. Albert Sabin announced that his live-attenuated oral polio vaccine was ready for mass testing.

http://wn.com/This_Day_That_Year_In_1860_Indian_Penal_Code_passed_into_law

Play Fullscreen

IPC Offences Relating to Marriage (S.493-498) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 3:11
Updated: 13 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XX - OF OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGE 493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage — Every man who by deceit causes any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. 494. Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife — Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. 495. Same offence with concealment of former marriage from person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted 496. Marriage ceremony fraudulently gone through without lawful marriage — 497. Adultery — Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. In such case the wife shall be punishable as an abettor. 498. Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman —

http://wn.com/IPC_Offences_Relating_to_Marriage_(S.493-498)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Dowry Death S 304B : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 1:19
Updated: 10 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 304B. Dowry death — (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, such death shall be called "dowry death", and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death. Explanation —For the purpose of this sub-section, "dowry" shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961). (2) Whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life. CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE Punishment—Imprisonment of not less than 7 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life—Cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Court of Session— Non-compoundable. COMMENTS Section 304B is a substantive provision creating a new offence and not merely a provision effecting a change in procedure for trial of a pre-existing substantive offence. As a consequence, accused cannot be tried and punished for the offence of dowry death provided in section 304-B of the Code with the minimum sentence of seven years’ imprisonment for an act done by them prior to creation of the new offence of dowry death; Soni Devrajbhai Babubhai v. State of Gujarat, 1991 Cr LJ (313) (SC).

http://wn.com/IPC_Dowry_Death_S_304B_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Stolen Property (S.410-414) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 2:34
Updated: 12 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Of the Receiving of Stolen Property 410. Stolen Property — Property, the possession whereof has been transferred by theft, or by extortion, or by robbery, and property which has been criminally misappropriated or in respect of which criminal breach of trust has been committed, is designed as "stolen property", whether the transfer has been made, or the misappropriation or breach of trust has been committed, within or without India. But, if such property subsequently comes into the possession of a person legally entitled to the possession thereof, it then ceases to be stolen property. 411. Dishonestly receiving stolen property — Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. 412. Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity — 413. Habitually dealing in stolen property — Whoever habitually receives or deals in property which he knows or has reason to believe to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. 414. Assisting in concealment of stolen property — Whoever voluntarily assists in concealing or disposing of or making away with property which he knows or has reason to believe to be stolen property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

http://wn.com/IPC_Stolen_Property_(S.410-414)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Criminal Tresspass and House Breaking (S.441-462) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 9:43
Updated: 13 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 441. Criminal trespass — Whoever enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person in possession of such property, or having lawfully entered into or upon such property, unlawfully remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult or annoy any such person, or with intent to commit an offence, is said to commit "criminal trespass". 442. House trespass — Whoever commits criminal trespass by entering into or remaining in any building, tent or vessel used as a human dwelling or any building used as a place for worship, or as a place for the custody of property, is said to commit "house- trespass". 443. Lurking house-trespass — Whoever commits house-trespass having taken precautions to conceal such house-trespass from some person who has a right to exclude or eject the trespasser from the building, tent or vessel which is the subject of the trespass, is said to commit "lurking house-trespass". 444. Lurking house-trespass by night — 445. House breaking — A person is said to commit "house-breaking" who commits house-trespass if he effects his entrance into the house or any part of it in any of the six ways hereinafter described; or if, being in the house or any part of it for the purpose of committing an offence, or, having committed an offence therein, he quits the house or any part of it in any of such six ways, that is to say: — First—If he enters or quits through a passage by himself, or by any abettor of the house-trespass, in order to the committing of the house-trespass. Secondly—If he enters or quits through any passage not intended by any person, other than himself or an abettor of the offence, for human entrance; or through any passage to which he has obtained access by scaling or climbing over any wall or building. Thirdly —If he enters or quits through any passage which he or any abettor of the house-trespass has opened, in order to the committing of the house- trespass by any means by which that passage was not intended by the occupier of the house to be opened. Fourthly —If he enters or quits by opening any lock in order to the committing of the house-trespass, or in order to the quitting of the house after a house-trespass. Fifthly —If he effects his entrance or departure by using criminal force or committing an assault or by threatening any person with assault. Sixthly —If he enters or quits by any passage which he knows to have been fastened against such entrance or departure, and to have been unfastened by himself or by an abettor of the house-tresspass (a) A commits house-trespass by making a hole through the wall of Z’s house, and putting his hand through the aperture. This is house-breaking. (b) A commits house-trespass by creeping into a ship at a port-hole between decks. This is house-breaking. (c) A commits house-trespass by entering Z’s house through a window. This is house-breaking. (d) A commits house-trespass by entering Z’s house through the door, having opened a door which was fastened. This is house-breaking. (e) A commits house-trespass by entering Z’s house through the door, having lifted a latch by putting a wire through a hole in the door. This is house-breaking. (f) A finds the key of Z’s house door, which Z had lost, and commits house- trespass by entering Z’s house, having opened the door with that key. This is house-breaking. 446. House-breaking by night — Whoever commits house-breaking after sunset and before sunrise, is said to commit "house-breaking by night". 447. Punishment for criminal trespass — 448. Punishment for house-trespass — 449. House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with death — 450. House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment for life — 451. House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment — 455. Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint 456. Punishment for lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night 457. Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment — 458. Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night after preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint 460. All persons jointly concerned in lurking house-trespass or house- breaking by night punishable where death or grievous hurt caused by one of them

http://wn.com/IPC_Criminal_Tresspass_and_House_Breaking_(S.441-462)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Right of Private Defence (S.96-99) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 6:05
Updated: 08 Sep 2014

Of the Right of Private Defence 96. Things done in private defence — Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence. COMMENTS (i) In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1991) Cr LJ 467 (SC) (ii) The accused is not required to prove the plea of private defence of person beyond reasonable manner of doubt. The onus on the accused is only to show that the defence version is probable one which is reflected from the salient features and the circumstances in the prosecution case itself; Sawai Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 2 Crimes 148 (Raj). 97. Right of private defence of the body and of property — Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99, to defend— First — His own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body; Secondly —The property, whether movable or immovable, of himself or of any other person, against any act which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, or which is an attempt to commit theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass. 98. Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc.— When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, or by reason of any misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence. 99. Acts against which there is no right of private defence — There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act, may not be strictly justifiable by law. There is no right of private defence against an act which does not, reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities. Extent to which the right may be exercised — The right of private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose of defence. Explanation 1 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant, as such, unless he knows or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is such public servant. Explanation 2 —A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant, unless he knows, or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is acting by such direction, or unless such person states the authority under which he acts, or if he has authority in writing, unless he produces such authority, if demanded.

http://wn.com/IPC_Right_of_Private_Defence_(S.96-99)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

Indian penal code section 498A || Voice Of Vanitha Part 2

Duration: 5:48
Updated: 15 Feb 2014

VANITHA TV - First Women Centric Channel in India Click here to Subscribe for more Videos: https://goo.gl/O9N2d1 LIKE us on FACEBOOK : https://www.facebook.com/vanithatv

http://wn.com/Indian_penal_code_section_498A_||_Voice_Of_Vanitha_Part_2

Play Fullscreen

IPC Abettment (S.107-120) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 16:02
Updated: 09 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 107. Abetment of a thing — A person abets the doing of a thing, who— First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or Secondly — Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or Thirdly — Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. 108. Abettor — A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor. 108A. Abetment in India of offences outside India — A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India. 109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment — Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence. 110. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor — Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other. 111. Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done — When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it: Proviso — Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment. 112. Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done — If the act for which the abettor is liable under the last preceding section is committed in addition to the act abetted, and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences. 113. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor — When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect. 114. Abettor present when offence is committed — Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence. 115. Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life—if offence not committed — Whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, shall, if that offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; 116. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment—if offence be not committed — 117. Abetting commission of offence by the public or by more than ten persons — 118. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life 119. Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent — 120. Concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment — Whoever, intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment, voluntarily conceals, by any act or illegal omission, the existence of a design to commit such offence, or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design,

http://wn.com/IPC_Abettment_(S.107-120)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

BQK PART - 3 TOPIC - INDIAN PENAL CODE on munsif tv

Duration: 14:48
Updated: 04 Mar 2014

INTERVIEW OF MOHD RAFATHULLAH ADVOCATE PRACTICING IN CRIMINAL COURTS OF HYDERABAD ANDHRA PRADESH-HYDERABAD DECCAN, TAKEN FOR MUNSIF TV BY SYED ETEMADUDDIN AD...

http://wn.com/BQK_PART_-_3_TOPIC_-_INDIAN_PENAL_CODE_on_munsif_tv

Play Fullscreen

IPC Private Defence (S.100-106) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 7:11
Updated: 08 Sep 2014

100. When the right of private defence of the body extends to causing death — namely: — First — Such an assault as may reasonably cause the apprehension that death will otherwise be the consequence of such assault; Secondly — Such an assault as may reasonably cause the apprehension that grievous hurt will otherwise be the consequence of such assault; Thirdly — An assault with the intention of committing rape; Fourthly — An assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust; Fifthly — An assault with the intention of kidnapping or abducting; Sixthly — An assault with the intention of wrongfully confining a person, under circumstances which may reasonably cause him to apprehend that he will be unable to have recourse to the public authorities for his release. 101. When such right extends to causing any harm other than death — If the offence be not of any of the descriptions enumerated in the last preceding section, the right of private defence of the body does not extend to the voluntary causing of death to the assailant, but does extend, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing to the assailant of any harm other than death. 102. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of the body — The right of private defence of the body commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises from an attempt or threat to commit the offence though the offence may not have been committed; and it continues as long as such apprehension of danger to the body continues. 103. When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death — The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong- doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely:— First — Robbery; Secondly — House-breaking by night; Thirdly — Mischief by fire committed on any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling, or as a place for the custody of property; Fourthly — Theft, mischief, or house-trespass, under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that death or grievous hurt will be the consequence, if such right of private defence is not exercised. 104. When such right extends to causing any harm other than death — If the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right of private defence, be theft, mischief, or criminal trespass, not of any of the descriptions enumerated in the last preceding section, that right does not extend to the voluntary causing of death, but does extend, subject to the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing to the wrong-doer of any harm other than death. 105. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of property — The right of private defence of property commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences. The right of private defence of property against theft continues till the offender has effected his retreat with the property or either the assistance of the public authorities is obtained, or the property has been recovered. The right of private defence of property against robbery continues as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint or as long as the fear of instant death or of instant hurt or of instant personal restraint continues. The right of private defence of property against criminal trespass or mischief continues as long as the offender continues in the commission of criminal trespass or mischief. The right of private defence of property against house-breaking by night continues as long as the house-trespass which has been begun by such house-breaking continues. 106. Right of private defence against deadly assault when there is risk of harm to innocent person — If in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence extends to the running of that risk.

http://wn.com/IPC_Private_Defence_(S.100-106)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Criminal Breach of Trust (S.405-409) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 4:26
Updated: 12 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi 405. Criminal breach of trust — Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust". 405. Criminal breach of trust — Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust". (a) A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriate them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (b) A is a warehouse-keeper. Z going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (c) A, residing in Calcutta, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z’s direction. Z remits a lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’s paper. A dishonestly disobeys the direction and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust. 406. Punishment for criminal breach of trust — 407. Criminal breach of trust by carrier, etc.— 408. Criminal breach of trust by clerk or servant — 409. Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent.—

http://wn.com/IPC_Criminal_Breach_of_Trust_(S.405-409)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Robbery and Dacoity (S.390-402) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 9:12
Updated: 12 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Of Robbery and Dacoity 390. Robbery — In all robbery there is either theft or extortion. When theft is robbery —Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carving away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint. When extortion is robbery —Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint to that person or to some other person, and, by so putting in fear, induces the person so put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted. Explanation —The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint. 391. Dacoity — When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or where the whole number of persons conjointly committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more, every person so committing, attempting or aiding, is said to commit "dacoity". 392. Punishment for robbery — 393. Attempt to commit robbery — 394. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery — 395. Punishment for dacoity — 396. Dacoity with murder — 397. Robbery, or dacoity, with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt 398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon 399. Making preparation to commit dacoity — 400. Punishment for belonging to gang of dacoits 401. Punishment for belonging to gang of thieves 402. Assembling for purpose of committing dacoity

http://wn.com/IPC_Robbery_and_Dacoity_(S.390-402)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

IPC Offence to Religion (S.295-298) : Indian Penal Code, 1860

Duration: 1:34
Updated: 10 Sep 2014

In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi CHAPTER XV - OF OFFENCES RELATING TO RELIGION 295. Injuring or defiling place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class — Whoever destroys, damages or defiles any place of worship, or any object held sacred by any class of persons with the intention of thereby insulting the religion of any class of persons or with the knowledge that any class of persons is likely to consider such destruction, damage or defilement as an insult to their religion, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. 295A. Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs — Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. 296. Disturbing religious assembly — Whoever voluntarily causes disturbance to any assembly lawfully engaged in the performance of religious worship, or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with 297. Trespassing on burial places, etc.— Whoever, with the intention of wounding the feelings of any person, or of insulting the religion of any person, or with the knowledge that the feelings of any person are likely to be wounded, or that the religion of any person is likely to be insulted thereby, commits any trespass in any place of worship or on any place of sculpture, or any place set apart from the performance of funeral rites or as a depository for the remains of the dead, or offers any indignity to any human corpse, or causes disturbance to any persons assembled for the performance of funeral ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. 298. Uttering, words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person— Whoever, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person or makes any gesture in the sight of that person or places, any object in the sight of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.

http://wn.com/IPC_Offence_to_Religion_(S.295-298)_Indian_Penal_Code,_1860

Play Fullscreen

photo: WN / Arturo Ubaub

Sexy woman swimming in Boracay - cleavage - boobs - breasts

Edit

Simple Breast Cancer Device In The Offing

Peace FM Online

24 Oct 2014

A simple, portable, said to be safe and less costly, easy-to-use device that could make breast cancer detection possible is to be introduced to hospital consulting rooms and households in Ghana once approved by the Ghana Health Service. Called the Breast-i, the torch-like device, with five buttons to match breast sizes, produces a red light when switched on ... Egypt and India have been using the Breast-i, he said ...   ....(size: 3.8Kb)

photo: USAF / Alex R. Lloyd

File - An F-35A Lightning II takes off March 25, 2014, from Hill Air Force Base, Utah en route to Nellis AFB, Nev. It was the first F-35 to receive organic modifications at the Ogden Air Logistics Complex at Hill AFB.

Edit

Beating Swords Into Scraps and Other Dystopian Tradeoffs

WorldNews.com

26 Oct 2014

Article by WN.com Correspondent Dallas Darling. It is a grave mistake to think that the prophetic tradition deals only with the future. Prophecy is actually forth telling and cyclical in nature, where present hardships and sufferings become so unbearable that the immoral and evil and misappropriated past is finally confronted. When Isaiah declared ... is beating swords into scraps. It is creating dystopian societies ... Make no mistake ... 133 ... ....(size: 5.5Kb)

« back to news headlines

Edit

Two held in fake job racket OUR CORRESPONDENT Bhubaneswar, Oct 26: Two men were arrested ...

The Telegraph India

27 Oct 2014

As the model code of conduct is in place in Maharashtra, our website is blocked, but an advertisement was published in news papers on October 7, said Mohapatra ... We have arrested the duo under section 419 (punishment for cheating by impersonation) and 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) of Indian Penal Code, said inspector in charge of Puri Town police station Jadunath Jena....(size: 2.0Kb)

Edit

Tardy pace cloud on ritual JITENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA IN DARBHANGA The tardy pace of cleanliness ...

The Telegraph India

27 Oct 2014

The tardy pace of cleanliness work at ponds, tanks and riverbanks by the civic body has cast a shadow over Chhath rituals. Devotees are in doubt of whether the civic body would complete work before October 29 ... Anyone found guilty would be punished under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code....(size: 1.4Kb)

Edit

Bangalore school, where 3-year-old was allegedly raped, reopens

The Siasat Daily

27 Oct 2014

... Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)," Reddi said ... The criminal case was registered late Tuesday under Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on a complaint by the child's father that his young daughter was molested while she was in the school....(size: 4.4Kb)

Edit

Tamil Nadu-Karnataka border paralysed for second day

The Times of India

27 Oct 2014

SALEM ... We have deployed nearly 300 police personnel on our border ... "We have registered cases against 1O forest officials under sections 143 (Punishment for unlawful assembly), 147 (Punishment for rioting), 149 (Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object), 3O2 (Punishment for murder) of the Indian Penal Code based on the complaint lodged by Santha, wife of Palani," said police ... ....(size: 4.2Kb)

Edit

Collection agent robbed of 5 lakh cash, scooter

The Times of India

26 Oct 2014

HYDERABAD ... Based on a complaint lodged by Younus, police registered a case under section 394 (robbery) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and launched a man-hunt to nab the offenders. tnn ....(size: 0.9Kb)

Edit

Doctor, wife booked for employing minor girls as housekeepers

The Hindu

25 Oct 2014

... Friday also imposed a penalty amount of Rs.1 lakh each on two counts under section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 342 (wrongful confinement) of the Indian Penal Code....(size: 0.9Kb)

Edit

Bangalore man gets 7-yr jail for wife's death

Deccan Herald

25 Oct 2014

... order against A K Devaiah, holding him liable for the offence of dowry death under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and other offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act....(size: 0.8Kb)

Edit

Goa doctor, wife convicted for child labour

The Hindu

25 Oct 2014

Dr ... The Children’s Court on Friday also imposed a penalty of Rs.1 lakh each on two counts under section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 342 (wrongful confinement) of the Indian Penal Code ... Keywords. Dr....(size: 1.0Kb)

Edit

14 vehicles damaged in midnight clash

The Times of India

25 Oct 2014

PUNE. As many as 14 vehicles were damaged in a clash between two groups at Matobanagar in Kothrud on Friday midnight ... Padwal escaped with minor injuries ... Padwal has registered a complaint against Malpote and others under sections of the Indian Penal Code. ....(size: 1.3Kb)

Edit

Goa governor's website hacked

The Siasat Daily

25 Oct 2014

Panaji, October 25 .. Goa Governor Mridula Sinha's website has been hacked by unknown people, the police said Saturday ... According to police, a First Information Report has been registered under Section 66 of the Information Technology and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. Police, however, have not been able to track the identity of the hackers yet ... Work in progress ." ... Indian Air Force asks personnel not to use Chinese Xiaomi phones....(size: 2.3Kb)

Edit

Bangalore rape: School secretary arrested for cheating

The Times of India

25 Oct 2014

BANGALORE. Police on Friday arrested KRK Reddy, general secretary of the trust which runs the North Bangalore school where a three-year-old girl was allegedly raped on Tuesday ... All have been booked under Section 18(5) of The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act 2009 (running school without certificate of recognition) and Sections 418 and 420 of Indian Penal Code (cheating) ... ....(size: 2.0Kb)

Edit

Insanity no defence if intent proved

The Times of India

25 Oct 2014

NEW DELHI ... "Even if the accused establishes unsoundness of mind, section 84 of the Indian Penal Code will not come to its rescue, in case it is found that the accused knew that what he was doing was wrong or that it was contrary to law," Additional Sessions Judge Rajesh Kumar Goel said. The incident took place on the morning of January 1, 2012 outside kali mata mandir in Rohini where both the accused and the deceased used to beg ... ....(size: 2.9Kb)

Edit

Sexual assualt case; Karna govt cracks down on institution

Deccan Herald

24 Oct 2014

... to protect) and 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) of the Indian Penal Code against "Orchids, The International School," he told PTI....(size: 0.8Kb)

This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Penal_Code

This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.

This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_code

This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.

This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal

This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.