Tim Ingold

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 1)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 05 Jun 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. [mp3] - www.archive.org [original link] - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_1

III ReACT (01/10/2011) - Tim Ingold - Science and silence

Order: Reorder
Duration: 108:26
Updated: 14 Nov 2012

Palestra do antropólogo britânico Tim Ingold durante o encerramento da III Reunião de Antropologia da Ciência e da Tecnologia, no dia 01 de outubro de 2011.

http://wn.com/III_ReACT_01_10_2011_Tim_Ingold_Science_and_silence

Tim Ingold - To Learn is to Improvise a Movement Along a Way of Life (part 1)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

www.cognitionandculture.net

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_To_Learn_is_to_Improvise_a_Movement_Along_a_Way_of_Life_part_1

Tim Ingold - Anthropology is Not Ethnography (part 1)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 02 Jun 2012

2007 Radcliffe-Brown Lecture in Social Anthropology at the British Academy. (Audio Only) PDF - www.proc.britac.ac.uk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_Anthropology_is_Not_Ethnography_part_1

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 2)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. [mp3] - www.archive.org [original link] - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_2

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 3)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. [mp3] - www.archive.org [original link] - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_3

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 4)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. [mp3] - www.archive.org [original link] - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_4

Tim Ingold - Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials (Part 1)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 12 Aug 2010

(Audio Only) MP3 - www.mediafire.com PDF - www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk My argument has five components, each of which corresponds to a key word in my title. First, I want to insist that the inhabited world is comprised not of objects but of things. I have therefore to establish a very clear distinction between things and objects. Secondly, I will establish what I mean by life, as the generative capacity of that encompassing field of relations within which forms arise and are held in place. I shall argue that the current emphasis, in much of the literature, on material agency is a consequence of the reduction of things to objects and of their consequent 'falling out' from the processes of life. Indeed, the more that theorists have to say about agency, the less they seem to have to say about life; I would like to put this emphasis in reverse. Thirdly, then, I will claim that a focus on life-processes requires us to attend not to materiality as such but to the fluxes and flows of materials. We are obliged, as Deleuze and Guattari say, to follow these flows, tracing the paths of form-generation, wherever they may lead. Fourth, I shall determine the specific sense in which movement along these paths is creative: this is to read creativity 'forwards', as an improvisatory joining in with formative processes, rather than 'backwards', as an abduction from a finished object to an intention in the mind of an agent. Finally, I shall show that the pathways or trajectories ...

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_Bringing_Things_to_Life_Creative_Entanglements_in_a_World_of_Materials_Part_1

Tim Ingold playing Beethoven

Order: Reorder
Duration: 5:35
Updated: 13 Oct 2012

British anthropologist (and cellist) Timothy Ingold, professor at The University of Aberdeen (Scotland), plays Beethoven's clarinet trio op. 11. 5 of october, 2011 in Belo Horizonte - Brazil, Music School of UFMG (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), Projeto VivaMusica.

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_playing_Beethoven

100 2369 Tim Ingold, Jr , Director of Engineering Development, Design Engineering, Jabil

Order: Reorder
Duration: 0:33
Updated: 17 Jun 2012

http://wn.com/100_2369_Tim_Ingold,_Jr_,_Director_of_Engineering_Development,_Design_Engineering,_Jabil

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:06
Updated: 06 Dec 2010

(last 10 minutes) According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. 05 February 2010 full video - mms://stream.dpu.dk/public/Gnosis/TimothyIngold12.wmv

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain

100 2367 Tim Ingold, Jr , Director of Engineering Development, Design Engineering, Jabil

Order: Reorder
Duration: 0:56
Updated: 17 Jun 2012

http://wn.com/100_2367_Tim_Ingold,_Jr_,_Director_of_Engineering_Development,_Design_Engineering,_Jabil

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 5)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. [mp3] - www.archive.org [original link] - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_5

100 2237 Tim Ingold, Jr , Director of Engineering Development, Design Engineering, Jabil, US

Order: Reorder
Duration: 0:30
Updated: 17 Jun 2012

http://wn.com/100_2237_Tim_Ingold,_Jr_,_Director_of_Engineering_Development,_Design_Engineering,_Jabil,_US

100 2239 Tim Ingold, Jr , Director of Engineering Development, Design Engineering, Jabil, US

Order: Reorder
Duration: 1:25
Updated: 17 Jun 2012

http://wn.com/100_2239_Tim_Ingold,_Jr_,_Director_of_Engineering_Development,_Design_Engineering,_Jabil,_US

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 6)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. [mp3] - www.archive.org [original link] - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_6

Tim Ingold for Pinellas County Sheriff Campaign Kickoff

Order: Reorder
Duration: 9:13
Updated: 25 Jan 2012

Tim Ingold, Republican candidate for Pinellas County Sheriff, addresses a crowd of nearly 200 people in the ballroom of the St. Petersburg Clearwater Marriott.

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_for_Pinellas_County_Sheriff_Campaign_Kickoff

100 2241 Tim Ingold, Jr , Director of Engineering Development, Design Engineering, Jabil, US

Order: Reorder
Duration: 0:39
Updated: 17 Jun 2012

http://wn.com/100_2241_Tim_Ingold,_Jr_,_Director_of_Engineering_Development,_Design_Engineering,_Jabil,_US

Tim Ingold - The Social Brain (part 7)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 1:36
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 03-05 FEBRUARY 2010 AT THE DANISH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, AARHUS UNIVERSITY, COPENHAGEN According to the so-called 'social brain' hypothesis, the expansion of the neocortex in human evolution is an adaptive response to the demands of managing social relationships in groups of increasing size. To simultaneously process and manipulate information about multiple relationships, it is argued, calls for a brain with formidable computing power. In this lecture I show that the hypothesis is misconceived in three respects. First, it rests on a false opposition between social and ecological relations. Second, it wrongly assumes that the workings of the mind can be equated with the operation of neural machinery internal to the organism. Third, treating the brain as a computational organ, it artificially divides the brain from the body that responds to its commands. I argue, to the contrary, that the brain is not an organ but an entanglement of neural tissue, that the patterns of activation in this tissue are inseparable from those conducted throughout the body, and that these patterns spill out into the world along lines of movement and growth. As a knotting together of these lines, the brain is social in a sense more fundamental than that envisaged by 'social brain' theorists. Indeed the sociality of the brain is none other than that of life itself. - www.dpu.dk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_The_Social_Brain_part_7

Candidate for Pinellas County Sheriff Tim Ingold Addresses the PCREC August 8, 2011

Order: Reorder
Duration: 1:05
Updated: 07 Feb 2012

Candidate for Pinellas County Sheriff Tim Ingold addressed the members of the Pinellas County Republican Executive Committee (PCREC) at their August 2011 meeting.

http://wn.com/Candidate_for_Pinellas_County_Sheriff_Tim_Ingold_Addresses_the_PCREC_August_8,_2011

Tim Ingold - To Learn is to Improvise a Movement Along a Way of Life (part 2)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 11 Apr 2012

www.cognitionandculture.net

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_To_Learn_is_to_Improvise_a_Movement_Along_a_Way_of_Life_part_2

Tim Ingold - Anthropology is Not Ethnography (part 2)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 25 Mar 2012

2007 Radcliffe-Brown Lecture in Social Anthropology at the British Academy. (Audio Only) PDF - www.proc.britac.ac.uk

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_Anthropology_is_Not_Ethnography_part_2

Tim Ingold - Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials (Part 2)

Order: Reorder
Duration: 10:00
Updated: 02 Oct 2010

(Audio Only) MP3 - www.mediafire.com PDF - www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk My argument has five components, each of which corresponds to a key word in my title. First, I want to insist that the inhabited world is comprised not of objects but of things. I have therefore to establish a very clear distinction between things and objects. Secondly, I will establish what I mean by life, as the generative capacity of that encompassing field of relations within which forms arise and are held in place. I shall argue that the current emphasis, in much of the literature, on material agency is a consequence of the reduction of things to objects and of their consequent 'falling out' from the processes of life. Indeed, the more that theorists have to say about agency, the less they seem to have to say about life; I would like to put this emphasis in reverse. Thirdly, then, I will claim that a focus on life-processes requires us to attend not to materiality as such but to the fluxes and flows of materials. We are obliged, as Deleuze and Guattari say, to follow these flows, tracing the paths of form-generation, wherever they may lead. Fourth, I shall determine the specific sense in which movement along these paths is creative: this is to read creativity 'forwards', as an improvisatory joining in with formative processes, rather than 'backwards', as an abduction from a finished object to an intention in the mind of an agent. Finally, I shall show that the pathways or trajectories ...

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold_Bringing_Things_to_Life_Creative_Entanglements_in_a_World_of_Materials_Part_2

Persondata
Name	Ingold, Tim
Alternative names
Short description
Date of birth	1948
Place of birth
Date of death
Place of death

Don LaFontaine
File:Don LaFontaine.jpg LaFontaine signing books in 2007
Born	Donald Leroy LaFontaine (1940-08-26)August 26, 1940 Duluth, Minnesota, U.S.
Died	September 1, 2008(2008-09-01) (aged 68) Los Angeles, California, U.S.
Cause of death	Pneumothorax
Nationality	American
Occupation	Voice actor
Years active	1962–2008
Spouse	Joan Studva (1967–1988) Nita Whitaker (1989–2008)
Children	Christine LaFontaine (age 40) Skye LaFontaine (age 20) Elyse LaFontaine (age 16)
Website
http://www.donlafontaine.com/

Persondata
Name	LaFontaine, Don
Alternative names	The King of Movie Trailers, Mr. Voice, Thunder Throat, The Voice of God
Short description	American voice actor
Date of birth	August 26, 1940
Place of birth	Duluth, Minnesota, United States
Date of death	September 1, 2008
Place of death	Los Angeles, California, United States

Make changes yourself !

Bibliography [link]

See also [link]

References [link]

http://wn.com/Tim_Ingold

Related pages:

http://ru.wn.com/Ингольд, Тим

Contents

Early life [link]

Career [link]

Death [link]

Dedications [link]

Satire and other appearances [link]

Selected filmography [link]

References [link]

External links [link]

http://wn.com/Don_LaFontaine

Related pages:

http://fr.wn.com/Don LaFontaine

http://de.wn.com/Don LaFontaine

http://it.wn.com/Don LaFontaine

http://nl.wn.com/Don LaFontaine

http://pl.wn.com/Don LaFontaine