Florida’s Department of Corrections recently fired 32 guards after years of alleged corruption in the prison system with at least four related inmate deaths. Union officials call the mass layoff a “Friday night massacre.” Now that’s one massacre I can get behind.
Reporters digging deeper into the prison records found multiple incidents of abuse and so-called “inappropriate uses of force.”
As prison system inspectors visited Franklin Correctional Institution they discovered an incident from three years prior in which an inmate, 27-year-old Randall Jordan-Aparo, begged officer Rollin Suttle Austin, to take him to the hospital because of a blood disorder and the officer ordered him “gassed.” Jordan-Aparo died that night.
The inspectors rightfully found that the fiasco constituted “sadistic, retaliatory” behavior by the guards, but they allege that when they brought their findings to Florida Department of Corrections Inspector General Jeffrey Beasley, he told them he would “have their asses” if they didn’t back off. The involved officers remain on staff, although the U.S Department of Justice is investigating the situation.
That makes me feel so much better …
Another incident involved mentally ill inmate Darren Rainey; after defecating in his cell he was locked in a closet like shower, “blasted by hot water,” taunted and then abandoned by officers to die. Witnesses report he was found on the shower drain with chunks of his skin falling off.
These incidents of pure evil are deemed anecdotal by those who continue to try and justify the prison state. How many examples of despicable abuse will it take for people to realize the problem is structural? How much more blood will prison guards have to get on their hands until they are rightly viewed as enemies of a peaceful society, rather than its protectors?
While the victims are merely names on a paper for various state functionaries to pretend to look into, they were real, flesh and blood individuals who suffered sickening torture at the hands of the prison state. Randall Jordan-Aparo and Darren Rainey are not anecdotes. Rather, they are examples of a much bigger, institutional problem.
That’s why the layoffs are not going to solve anything. The abuses of the prison state, while sad, are a predictable consequence of handing “justice” over to a state monopoly. The prison state is a system of oppression that normalizes abuses of power and acts of terror, leaving inmates at the mercy of unaccountable guards.
Unaccountability, as in the case of officer Austin, is routine. There are simply no incentives for the inner workings of the prison monopoly to tend toward keeping guards’ power in check. Only when outside reporters delve into the reports — a rare occurrence — is the state forced to act “responsibly.” And even then, the response is often mere show to appease the public rather than actual change. After all, real change would involve relinquishing state power – the last thing state functionaries will allow.
It took three years for Randall Jordan-Aparo’s death to even come to light and now all we get is an “investigation” — the state’s favorite appeasement technique. While it looks like accountability, an investigation by a fellow state functionary is no such thing. Real, true accountability is only achievable through a dispersion of power — and that means abolishing the whole system.
The state claims a monopoly on justice, but that’s not the real truth. The real truth is that the state removes any chances of justice.
Translations for this article:
- Italian, Nessuna Giustizia dallo Stato Prigione.
Citations to this article:
- Cory Massimino, No Justice from the Prison State, CounterPunch, 09/25/14
"The abuses of the prison state, while sad, are a predictable consequence of handing “justice” over to a state monopoly."
Well, there's something to that . . . but states all over the world do that, and yet the US system seems to be both qualitatively and quantitavely worse than most of them, certainly most in the "developed" world. That is, the number incarcerated is far greater than anywhere else (more in absolute numbers even than totalitarian China whose population is three times larger!) and the conditions seem worse than most other places short of the nastiest dictatorships. Certainly if you compare to statist countries in Northwestern Europe, the difference is stark.
Something other than state involvement or even state monopoly must distinguish the US system. Off the top of my head, things that distinguish the US from other countries with prison systems would include its status as an empire (or, if you prefer, "world leader"), its legacy of racism, its level of inequality, and in fact the degree of private, corporate involvement in the prison system, leading to profit motives for expanding the system and worsening conditions by cutting costs (whether on facilities, guard training or what have you). On this last point, in effect for most countries the prison system is a purely state endeavour, but in the US it is a system of subsidies (both subsidies in the sense of paying companies to maintain prisons, and labor subsidies in the sense that prisoners are made to act as workers for various companies but their wages are dictated by the state, so they are in no sense contracting freely but are instead basically slave labor, and meanwhile the state pays their "keep" so the corporate employer can ignore those expenses–normally a company can't get workers if it doesn't pay enough to keep them alive, but not in the prison system).