- published: 06 Aug 2012
- views: 18948
In logic, a tautology (from the Greek word ταυτολογία) is a formula that is true in every possible interpretation.
Philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein first applied the term to redundancies of propositional logic in 1921. (It had been used earlier to refer to rhetorical tautologies, and continues to be used in that alternate sense.) A formula is satisfiable if it is true under at least one interpretation, and thus a tautology is a formula whose negation is unsatisfiable. Unsatisfiable statements, both through negation and affirmation, are known formally as contradictions. A formula that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction is said to be logically contingent. Such a formula can be made either true or false based on the values assigned to its propositional variables. The double turnstile notation is used to indicate that S is a tautology. Tautology is sometimes symbolized by "Vpq", and contradiction by "Opq". The tee symbol is sometimes used to denote an arbitrary tautology, with the dual symbol (falsum) representing an arbitrary contradiction; in any symbolism, a tautology may be substituted for the truth value "true," as symbolized, for instance, by "1."
Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, logike) is the branch of philosophy concerned with the use and study of valid reasoning. The study of logic also features prominently in mathematics and computer science.
Logic was studied in several ancient civilizations, including Greece, India, and China. In the West, logic was established as a formal discipline by Aristotle, who gave it a fundamental place in philosophy. The study of logic was part of the classical trivium, which also included grammar and rhetoric. Logic was further extended by Al-Farabi who categorized it into two separate groups (idea and proof). Later, Avicenna revived the study of logic and developed relationship between temporalis and the implication. In the East, logic was developed by Hindus, Buddhists and Jains.
Logic is often divided into three parts: inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning, and deductive reasoning.
The concept of logical form is central to logic. The validity of an argument is determined by its logical form, not by its content. Traditional Aristotelian syllogistic logic and modern symbolic logic are examples of formal logic.
In this video, we explain what a tautology is and how to use a truth table to determine if a statement is a tautology. Special appearance by xkcd!
http://gametheory101.com/courses/logic-101/ In logic, tautologies are statements that are are always true regardless of premises. Because no premises are involved, we have to use proof by contradiction or conditional proofs to give us something to work with. Apologies for the blinking a few minutes into the video. I'm not sure what's going on with my video capture...
Truth Tables - Tautology and Contradiction. In this video I construct two more truth tables and use them to illustrate the notion of a tautology and a contradiction.
How to use a truth tree to determine if a proposition (or wff in propositional logic) is a contradiction, tautology, or contingency.
tautology contradiction contingency mathematical logic examples
Visit my website: http://bit.ly/1zBPlvm Subscribe on YouTube: http://bit.ly/1vWiRxW Hello, welcome to TheTrevTutor. I'm here to help you learn your college courses in an easy, efficient manner. If you like what you see, feel free to subscribe and follow me for updates. If you have any questions, leave them below. I try to answer as many questions as possible. If something isn't quite clear or needs more explanation, I can easily make additional videos to satisfy your need for knowledge and understanding.
Here is a quick tutorial on two different truth tables. If you have any questions or would like me to do a tutorial on a specific example, then please comment down below and I will get back to you as soon as possible!
With much practice. Using truth tables to calculate truth value of compound statements. Also, learning about contingent, tautologous, contradictory statements, as well as consistent and inconsistent statements.
GATE problem related to Tautology
This lecture contains what is propositional function and what is tautology and how one can find a given formula tautology or not
gametheory101.com/courses/logic-101/ When needing to prove a biconditional tautology in logic, there is a simple algorithm you should always follow. First, use a conditional proof to show one half of the biconditional. Then use a second conditional proof to show the other half of the biconditional. Finally, group those conditional together using biconditional introduction.
negation,conjunction,dis junction,implication. byconditional, tautology
An explanation of the T symbol used to represent tautologies, and the upside down T symbol used to represent contradictions.
How to determine a statement is a tautology or not https://sites.google.com/site/mrsindroja/home
Implications Tautological Implications Logical Consequences Difference between implications and tautological implications
DISCRETE MATHS -- PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC -. LECTURE 8. - Marzo. 30th - ESCUELA UNIVERSITARIA DE INFORMÁTICA - PACO GÓMEZ Descripción: Analytic tableaux. Simplifiable, developable, disjunctive and conjunctive formulae. Description of the construction of an analytic tableaux. Halting conditions. Obtaining the models from the tree. Determining whether a formula is tautology or contradiction. Examples.
Course is presented by professor Rob A. Rutenbar is the Abel Bliss Professor and Head of the Department of Computer Science (CS) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is an affiliate Professor in ECE at Illinois For more information register here https://www.coursera.org/course/vlsicad
Using a series of logical equivalences to prove a compound proposition is always true. Preview of future material: this proof also shows that hypothetical syllogism is a valid rule of inference
The concepts of exclusive and inclusive disjunctions, tautology, contradiction, and contingency are explained well. Logical equivalence was introduced and some examples were solved. www.samuelchukwuemeka.com
Step by step description of exercise 16 from our text. Using key logical equivlances we will show p iff q is logically equivalent to (p AND q) OR (NOT p AND NOT q)
มาแล้วครับ กับเฉลยข้อสอบคณิตศาสตร์ เลข PAT1 รอบล่าสุด มีนาคม 2559^^ พี่อุ๋ยคัดเอาข้อที่น่าสนใจๆ มาฝากน้องๆกันเลยครับ เราไปดูกันว่า ข้อสอบ PAT1 รอบสอง นี้ จะมีข้อไหนบ้าง เรื่องอะไรบ้าง ยากง่ายอย่างไร ตามไปดูกันเลยครับ ^^ ติวสอบเข้าวิศวะ, ติวสอบเข้าแพทย์ , ติวสอบเข้ามหาลัยทุกคณะ , ONET PAT 1 ,GAT PAT ,ติวสอบเกรด ,วิเคราะโจทย์ทางคณิตศาสตร์ คณิตศาสตร์ ม.4,คณิตศาสตร์ ม.5,คณิตศาสตร์ ม.6 โจทย์อยู่ตรงนี้ครับ http://www.mediafire.com/download/valwxe1az13t7rc/pat1_youtube.pdf ช่องทางการติดตามพี่อุ๋ย Facebook: www.facebook.com/tutorouiplus Twitter: @tutoroui_plus YouTube Channel: tutorouiplus Website : http://www.tutoroui-plus.com / http://www.tutoroui-plus.com เรียน ติวเลข คณิตศาสตร์ ม.ปลาย ออนไลน์ที่ course.tutoroui-plus.com
This video begins to explain how to do proofs using the rules of inference. It explains why we use proofs instead of additional rules, goes over a few example proofs, then gives you some proofs to try on your own. The solutions to these proofs are covered in a subsequent video. The text used to make this video is posted on my blog at http://wisdom.is-best.net/127/logic/proofs-with-the-rules-of-inference/ This video is part of a series on symbolic logic. If you don't already know the rules of inference, check out the earlier videos in this playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB5DB5BBF7BCA64DF