United LEFT

**working for unity in action of all the LEFT in the UK** (previously known as the RESPECT SUPPORTERS BLOG)

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Mark Steel: My guess is the cleaners are to blame

PhotobucketMark Steel: My guess is the cleaners are to blame.

This year's television drama awards must surely go to the news, whose current scriptwriters are outstanding. Next week Newsnight will end with James Murdoch being told his real dad isn't Rupert, it's Fidel Castro. Then the credits will roll and we'll all be desperate to see the next episode.

The only quibble I have is those days when there are two resignations, as the second one comes before there's time to properly enjoy the first. So come on police chiefs, spare a thought for your public and space these things out properly.

Yesterday's instalment was genius, in which Rupert himself answered questions such as "Mr Murdoch, do you remember a paper called the News of the World" with "Er, hmmm, the what? News you say, hmmmmm, brrr err I don't recall it." It's a sign of Murdoch's declining power that he didn't buy the rights to show himself at the select committee and put it on Sky on pay-per-view.

But for all the resignations and arrests no one yet has personally admitted to doing anything wrong. For example, there seems to be an agreed line that ex-policeman Yates didn't pursue the first investigation properly because he was busy dealing with other issues, such as terrorism. I hope he was more thorough with that part of his job, and didn't say: "I've got a bin liner full of documents here with details about where al-Qa'ida is planning to blow up. So I want everyone to work round the clock in ignoring them completely. That should keep everyone safe."

To be fair there were other matters the police were dealing with at this time. Just one incident that clogged them up for a while was the perjury case against Tommy Sheridan, the socialist member of the Scottish parliament, after he successfully sued the News of the World for libel, which had claimed he'd been to a swingers' club. It was reported that Rupert pledged revenge against the "Commie bastard", Luckily he didn't have to ask the police for their help, because they spent £1.5m on an investigation, taking what they accept was "thousands" of hours, at the same period that the investigation into phone hacking was slightly less rigorous.

Maybe this was part of the counter-terrorism campaign, and they thought Tommy Sheridan was planning a new trend in suicide bombing, in which Scottish socialists turn up at swingers' clubs dressed only in explosives in the knowledge everyone will think it's a fetish, before blowing themselves up in support of the campaign for an increase in the minimum wage.

BBC Scotland wondered at the time: "Why should precious resources be wasted on such a stupid exercise?" as it's almost unprecedented for the police to pursue a case of perjury after a libel trial. Tommy Sheridan's car and phone were bugged, and the trial that sent him to jail cost millions more, but luckily the police found the funds and time for this, probably because the evidence wasn't wrapped up in bin liners, which are a nuisance to open.

One answer may be that at the time the paper and the police seemed to be getting on extremely well, with the paper paying policemen, and the police employing PR people from the paper. But that would be cynical as this was clearly an elaborate job-exchange system, similar to those programmes where they get dustmen and accountants to swap places for a week.

But these are complicated questions because News International is a complex company. The company has paid thousands in legal fees but the owners have no idea who made the payments. My guess is it was one of the cleaners. And the most ridiculous plot line in this story altogether, is that the bumbling, pathetic, forgetful fool who sat there unable to answer any questions about his own company in yesterday's hearing, is the bloke all our governments have been grovelling to for the last 30 years.

Fidel Castro. Then the credits will roll and we'll all be desperate to see the next episode.

The only quibble I have is those days when there are two resignations, as the second one comes before there's time to properly enjoy the first. So come on police chiefs, spare a thought for your public and space these things out properly.

Labels: ,

Friday, July 08, 2011

Strike the empire back by George Galloway

PhotobucketStrike the empire back by George Galloway in the Morning Star.

Twenty-five years ago today I, along with many a Morning Star supporter, would have been preparing to head out east of Tower Hill to join the courageous sacked print workers and journalists on the Saturday night picket of fortress Wapping.

Oh how the Establishment railed against us, and with them nearly every national title.

The trade unions were a cancer at the heart of British society, you see.

They were the bully boys, a threat to freedom of speech and opinion, an unaccountable power subverting the democratic process.

And now?

Well, we all know where we are - or do we?

It's worth reminding ourselves of some profound truths.

Because in an age of 24-hour rolling news we are already seeing moves to bury the full depravity of what went on at the News of the World and still does in Murdoch's empire under mutual backslapping, asinine comment and extraneous detail.

Murdoch and the rich and powerful whose interests he so assiduously promotes are desperate to cap this volcano of public outrage.

For all the righteous indignation and talk of inquiries, powerful interests way beyond Murdoch don't want us to examine the fundamental questions.

Here is the flagship paper of an overweening media empire which helped hurl this country into war after war and then hacked the phones of relatives grieving at the loss of the very soldiers it had done so much to put in harm's way.

And then, with a straight face, "campaigned" for the armed forces' covenant.

Here is a rag which took genuine public grief at horrific crimes against children, manipulated it into dangerous and cynical campaigns to sell more papers, and all the while spied on the parents of the very murdered child in whose name it said it was acting.

Here is a sewer which gushes forth filthy smears that disabled people and single parents are scroungers who refuse to take responsibility, while its gilded executives - the son placed in the top job by daddy - sack others to save their own.

No-one should be surprised, because this is an outfit that vilifies migrants and Muslims while remaining in the grip of a foreign billionaire who scarcely pays tax in this country.

Through it all, of course, were the sub-pornographic titillation and advertising offers - the bread and circuses which were the News of the World's stock in trade for a century and a half. For that reason alone, while no-one wants to see people losing their jobs as austerity stalks the land, I for one cannot summon up some faux nostalgia for the dirty little secret that came out each Sunday.

What sympathy comes from the leader columns of Murdoch's papers for the hundreds of thousands of people who are being thrown out of work on account of the bankers' gambling?

And this is the inconvenient truth which is lapping at the door of David Cameron and all he represents.

The News of the World was a pillar of the Establishment.

It and Murdoch have fuelled the furnace in which bigotry, nastiness and narrow-mindedness were boiled up and poured like an acid onto everything good in this society.

Worse for Cameron, he - as Blair before him - is bound by a thousand golden threads to Murdoch.

He went horse-riding regularly with Rebekah Brooks and shared last Christmas dinner with her.

Ed Miliband and Labour have astutely focused on Brooks and Andy Coulson.

The orchestration was so smooth this week that I sensed the hand of Peter Mandelson, who swore that Murdoch would regret pulling support for New Labour.

Everyone knows that Cameron is next in the crosshairs.

It was he who hired the disgraced former editor of the News of the World to be his press supremo.

Now Coulson is interviewed under caution, arrested and his testimony at Tommy Sheridan's perjury trial being re-examined for... possible perjury.

The police themselves have a case to answer.

The original investigation was perfunctory in the extreme - we had already been told brazenly by Brooks at a parliamentary committee that her paper often paid police officers for information.

Think about that. It was eight years ago.

It was largely passed over by press, Parliament and police.

It was an admission of a serious crime - suborning public officials, police officers no less.

Then a senior police officer who was involved in the first fiasco investigation, got a job with Murdoch.

Now we know that the sums involved were rather large.

And for those who chose to see, the corruption was plain. I spoke about it in Parliament and in the courts, when I exposed the agent provocateur Mazer Mahmoud, aka the Fake Sheikh.

How they dismissed it as the whining of the left, yesterday's men - the dinosaurs who were felled at Wapping a quarter of a century ago.

Now the situation has changed, changed utterly.

Miliband - still disturbingly faltering, but at least on the front foot - hit a vital seam when he said this week that it was people power that had done for Murdoch's rancid title.

That's true, but it required the sustained efforts of the fearless Tom Watson MP, the Guardian's Nick Davies and others to keep this issue alive.

And that is what should be unleashed now.

The Murdoch game-plan is clear - use the crisis to push through a long-standing move to rationalise his print operation, squeezing the Sun to seven days a week while battening down the hatches and getting his mitts on BSkyB. Cameron's aim is to kick this into the long grass.

And Ed is, well, doing his best.

It can't be left to that.

This ought to be a tipping point.

The people who can make it so are the people, not the Parliament.

It is plain that it was the prospect of an advert-free News of the World being burnt publicly across the country tomorrow that forced Murdoch to pull the title.

In the age of Twitter and Facebook, calls for consumer or public action could spread in hours.

Now the public campaign needs to be sustained.

And while Brooks's sacking became the central focus on the day and an entire paper was closed to keep her in place, the issues go beyond that.

She represents the sordid nexus between the Murdoch empire, 10 Downing Street, the police and MPs who were for so long too cowed to do anything about it.

That entire corrupted set of relationships must be dragged into the light of day.

At the centre of the web is Murdoch himself, a mogul who has made no secret of his desire to bend politics and politicians to serve his interests - like Silvio Berlusconi, operating across continents.

For 40 years Murdoch has played a central role in the war against the left in this country, against the unions, against working people and their interests, and for a capitalism red in tooth and claw.

His papers savaged the Labour Party until the Blairite coterie took over and began seeking and destroying all that was labour.

Even as Ed Miliband rose to land some punches on David Cameron, half the Labour front bench were still ruminating on the banquet they had enjoyed at one of Murdoch's parties a couple of weeks earlier.

This is a moment when the basic line of division in the society stands exposed - hence attempts to bury that line as quickly as possible.

Something very big is happening. It comes after the MPs' expenses scandal and then the outrage at the bankers' bonuses and recklessness.

A third pillar of the Establishment is now cracking under public pressure and large numbers of people are beginning to glimpse the truth behind the facade.

The front page of the Financial Times, the world's business paper, captured something of the moment on Thursday.

It pictured Murdoch fleeing a press pack at a golf club in Utah.

The world's most powerful media baron telling the journos that he had "no comment" and looking for all the world like an aged mafioso taking refuge in Miami.

For that's what this is all about, when all is said and done.

A mafia at the top of our society - suborning, running protection rackets, making offers you can't refuse and occasionally rubbing out those who fall out of line.

So while it is good to see Cameron forced into announcing inquiries into the scandal, no inquiry headed by a British Establishment figure, judge or not, is going to address these questions.

It's not about some egregious excesses, it's about the whole rotten structure.

We have a long history of inquiries appointed in order to slow the pace of events and kick matters into.

I half expected a call for a royal commission - they usually take three years.

For progressives and the left, we cannot leave matters there.

These are circumstances where the left can find a resonance among much greater numbers of people.

We need to raise the banner high for the values and ideas which Murdoch sought to crush at Wapping.

I am discussing with many others across the spectrum how we can seize this time to shift the balance against an Establishment which is desperate to regroup, in order to drive through the structural adjustment of British society, support for militarism and a nasty populist bigotry - all the things that the News of the World specialised in.

Labels: ,

NoTW and HMA v Thomas Sheridan: Press Conference Report by James Doleman

PhotobucketNoTW and HMA v Thomas Sheridan: Press Conference Report by James Doleman.

A crowded press conference today heard from Aamer Anwar, Tommy Sheridan’s solicitor, and Tom Watson MP about a “dossier” of information they were handing over to Strathclyde police.


Amongst the documents it contained was; a page from the notebook of convicted investigator Glen Mulcaire which contained Tommy Sheridan’s personal details, including his mobile phone number and his “PIN code”, transcripts of evidence given by News of the World staff at last years perjury trial, and extracts from a “blue book” of instructions given to private detectives by News of the World journalists including Rebecca Brooks the current Chief Executive of News International (UK).

These documents, Mr Anwar claimed, showed that the jury in the Tommy Sheridan trial had, intentionally or unintentionally, been misled.

Included in the dossier given to police, but not the copy passed to the assembled journalists, was a document received by the solicitor nine months ago, which Mr Anwar claims list the names of “scores of Scots”, ranging from “football players to murder victims”, whose phones had also been hacked by Glen Mulcaire. Mr Anwar refused to reveal any of the names of the people involved, for “confidentiality reasons” or the source of the document. He did however call on Strathclyde police to inform the alleged victims and investigate their cases.

Mr Anwar also distributed a record of the evidence given by Bob Bird, Scottish editor of the News of the World, to the commission charged with discovering evidence for the Sheridan trial. At that hearing Mr Bird had stated that email exchanges between News International executives relating to the Sheridan case had been “lost” when they were archived in Mumbai, India and therefore could not be used in evidence. This, Mr Anwar said appeared to have been untrue as the emails had been discovered this year at News International’s Wapping headquarters. This he claimed has also led to the full facts of the case being concealed from the defence and, ultimately the jury.

Tom Watson MP then addressed the press. He said he had left the “media storm” in London because he believed the concealment of the emails and the extent of News of the World’s phone hacking may have “influenced the jury” adding that “Tommy Sheridan may be an innocent man”. This, Mr Watson stated was more important to highlight than any press interview in London.

Both men ended the conference by calling on Strathclyde police to conduct a “robust investigation” into possible perjury at the Tommy Sheridan trial and, as Tommy Sheridan was an MSP at the time of the alleged hacking, for the Scottish parliament to urgently consider undertaking an enquiry. They then left to deliver their dossier to Strathclyde police.

Shortly after the press conference concluded it was announced that the News of the World is to be closed.

James Doleman authored the
daily blog reporting of the HMA v Sheridan trial in 2010.

Link: The Firm

Labels:

Thursday, July 07, 2011

Sheridan, hacking and the News of the World - James Doleman

PhotobucketSheridan, hacking and the News of the World - James Doleman.Link

During the trial Sheridan’s defence argued he had been the victim of a plot by News International to “do him in”, and that this had involved Sheridan’s phone being hacked.

Evidence presented to the court showed that police had discovered Sheridan’s personal details in the notebooks of convicted phone hacker and News of the World contractor Glenn Mulcaire.

The defence had argued that information gathered from voicemail and a listening device in Sheridan’s car was used to manufacture evidence in the perjury case, including an alleged video tape of him apparently confessing to visiting a sex club in Manchester.

At Sheridan’s perjury trial, advocate-depute Alex Prentice QC dismissed the significance of phone hacking during his summation to the jury, claiming it was irrelevant to the charge and pointed to the testimony of Detective Chief Superintendent Williams. The police officer had told the jury he found “no evidence” that Sheridan’s voicemail had been accessed illegally.

Prentice also claimed that the contents of the McNeilage tape had not been gathered from any illegal voicemail access, and that no evidence existed of phone or voicemail interception.

The advocate-depute’s claim relied on the testimony of a police detective whose investigation concluded that just one person’s phone had ever been hacked by Mulcaire.

Andrew Coulson

At the trial News of the World editor Andrew Coulson testified to having no knowledge of Sheridan’s phone being hacked and that “no culture of hacking” existed at the newspaper. Coulson also claimed he was never in contact with Mulcaire and that he did not even know his name until Mulcaire had been arrested, telling the court: ”I never met him, spoke to him or emailed him.”

Coulson did however admit that the newspaper used Mulcaire’s company, 9 Consultancy, revealing that he had once asked a NotW department head to reduce the amount of money the company was being paid.

The perjury trial was also told by Coulson that his staff did not pay police officers, replying to the defence’s question with: “Not to my knowledge.”

However, the BBC recently reported that “e-mails, which appear to show that Mr Coulson authorised the payments, have been passed to the police”.

Has Coulson committed perjury? Whatever the answer to that question, another more complicated one arises: does it affect Sheridan’s own conviction for perjury?

Scottish legal writer “Lallands Peat Worrier” points out that Coulson was a witness for the defence and not the prosecution, making it more difficult to argue that Coulson’s evidence formed a key part of the Crown’s case against Sheridan.

However, News International employees Bob Bird and Douglas Wight, as well as NotW solicitor Kenneth Lang, were indeed Crown witnesses. All three were questioned in court about phone hacking.

If it also emerges that the Scottish News of the World intercepted voice messages, questions will be raised about Bird, Wight and Lang’s evidence.

Emails

One of the more contentious parts of Sheridan’s trial (as in many other trials) was the process of “discovery” of evidence by the defence.

One example was the claim made by Coulson, Bird and Lang. They all insisted that two years’ worth of email records belonging to News Group Newspapers had been lost when the data was allegedly transferred to India.

But in January, The Independent newspaper reported that those “lost” emails had now been found.

Bird was forced to apologise for, in his words, “inadvertently misleading the court”.

Given that these emails are the source of the new revelations about NotW’s phone hacking activities, Sheridan’s defence lawyers will surely demand to see them?

Conclusion

Crown witnesses during the perjury trial testified that any notion of Sheridan’s phone being hacked was “far-fetched” or rejected the assertion as mere “conspiracy theory”.

While under cross-examination, Coulson himself said that any claims Sheridan’s phone was being hacked can be true in “the parallel universe that exists only in [Sheridan's] mind”.

Now that widely reported new allegations say that NotW, under Coulson’s editorship, hacked so many people’s phones (including one belonging to a murdered child, phones belonging to the families of 7/7 bombing victims and the phones of dead soldiers) is it inconceivable that a politician suing the newspaper for slander would also be having his phone hacked?

More to the point, is it actually believable that NotW would not hack Sheridan’s phone?

If the jury at the perjury trial had been aware of this new information, would the verdict on Sheridan have been different?

One thing is for sure. Serious questions must be asked about Sheridan’s conviction for perjury.

Is his conviction unsound now that even more doubt has been raised about so many key witness?

Strathclyde Police and the Crown Office must now set to work immediately in finding out the truth.

Update

BBC Scotland is reporting:

“Witness statements at the Tommy Sheridan perjury trial are to be probed following new allegations in the News of the World phone hacking scandal.

The Crown Office has asked Strathclyde Police for a “preliminary assessment” and to hand any findings to prosecutors for possible further action.

Those who gave evidence at the trial included Bob Bird, Douglas Wight and former editor Andy Coulson.”

Labels:

Salma Yaqoob resigns as Respect Councillor for health reasons.

PhotobucketSalma Yaqoob resigns as Respect Councillor for health reasons.

Thursday, 7 July 201
1

Time to take a step back


"This week I told party members, friends and supporters of my decision to resign as the Councillor for Sparkbrook. It has not been an easy decision, but it is one that I have had to make in the interests of my health.


For some time now those close to me have been very aware that I have been battling with health issues. Unfortunately over the past 12 months it has taken a turn for the worse. I have found it increasingly difficult to keep up with my very busy schedule, and to satisfactorily fulfil the commitments that my role demands.


As a result of my worsening health I simply cannot continue to represent Sparkbrook in the way that I think its people deserve.


I was elected as a councillor in 2005, and again in 2010, and I have always felt it was a real privilege to work for Sparkbrook. There are so many examples of initiative and commitment, and so many people who come together to achieve better things for the community.


To all those who I have worked with over the years, and to those who have campaigned, supported and voted for me, I offer my sincere and humble gratitude.


I am proud of our work as Respect Party councillors since 2005; proud that we stood up to the parties of war and big business; and proud of the representation we gave to people who had been let down by the big parties who took them for granted.


For the time being, I have to take a step back and give myself the time and space to concentrate on regaining my health. However, I am not retiring from politics just yet! I still have things to say and - health permitting - I hope to continue with occasional media appearances, writing and public speaking.


I may have been forced to resign as a councillor. But I remain as committed as ever to the struggle for a world free of war, racism and poverty".


Link:
Salma Yaqoob blog

Labels: