United LEFT

**working for unity in action of all the LEFT in the UK** (previously known as the RESPECT SUPPORTERS BLOG)

Thursday, May 28, 2009

No2EU - Yes to Democracy Election Broadcast



Vote No2EU - Yes to Democracy on June 4 (Election Broadcast)


The broadcast was televised on Channel 5 on May 26.


It will also be shown on the following stations and times:


* S4C – Wednesday May 27, 7.25pm (Welsh language)


* BBC One - Wednesday May 27, 10.35pm


* BBC Two - Wednesday May 27, 11.20pm


* BBC Wales - Wednesday May 27, 10.35pm


* BBC Scotland – Wednesday May 27, 10.35pm


* ITV Scotland – Wednesday May 29, 10.30pm


* ITV – Friday May 29, 10.30pm


* ITV Wales – Friday May 29, 10.30pm


Video:
Tony Benn explains why there should be a referendum on the renamed EU Constitution

No2EU - Yes to Democracy is a coalition of trade unionists, political parties and campaigning groups which have come together to defend democracy here and across the European Union, so lend us your vote in the Euro elections on June 4.

Link: Help Southwark Respect with their No2EU campaign.
Link: No2EU Web site

Labels:

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Labour's car crash - Morning Star

Labour's car crash - Morning Star.

The rats are now openly attacking the captain of their sinking ship.

Health Secretary Alan Johnson, who in Monday's Times set out his allegedly "modernising" credentials, talks of the need to "overhaul the engine, not just clean the upholstery." Morning Star readers would no doubt agree.

But to run with Mr Johnson's motoring analogy, there is a dodgy tactic in the car trade known as "cut and shut."

It's the illegal welding of parts of two damaged cars together to create a "new," fundamentally unsafe vehicle that will temporarily fool - and potentially kill - an unsuspecting buyer.

Whatever Mr Johnson has in mind for the Labour government would undoubtedly bear more resemblance to a cut and shut than an engine overhaul.

And the tired, abused electorate which voted Labour in on a landslide in the hope of heralding a brighter post-Thatcherite era have become so used to the blatant betrayal and hypocrisy of careerists such as Mr Johnson that they are unlikely to be attracted by the outdated model of vehicle he is offering, regardless of whether the engine is purring like a cat, the upholstery has been cleaned or it comes with a set of free red fluffy dice.

The truth is that none of the self-interested individuals who now comprise the top echelons of the Labour Party has what it takes to avert the slow-motion car crash that the party and democracy now face.

Talk of proportional representation, at least from the likes of Mr Johnson, is a red herring, one that will on its own do little to avert the spectres of falling participation in our partial democracy and the rising fortunes of the far-right.

Whatever the merits of PR - and there are many on the left who would advocate such a system - the ongoing disappearance of Westminster up its own rear is the result of something far more fundamental.

So long as MPs are hand-picked centrally rather than chosen freely by local democratic structures, so long as alternative ideas on the structure of society are wilfully ignored in craven deference to the failed financial sector formerly feted as Britain's road to wealth, so long as elected representatives in Parliament hang blindly on the mumbo-jumbo spouted by private-sector consultants and wealthy business figures, the crisis of our political system will continue.

The rest of the media may blind people to the truth by obsessing over Blairites and Brownites, incestuous leadership bids and rivalries. In reality, not one of the media's supposed "players," whether Johnsonites, Milibandonions or Purnellniks, has the imagination or desire to see past sell-offs, spin and private-sector sycophancy.

Labour and British democracy are indeed in need of a complete overhaul, but this cannot come from the bankrupt remnants of new Labour, their greedy cuts-obsessed counterparts the Tories or the falsehoods and hate of the far-right.

The People's Charter, which is currently being discussed and engaged with by trade unionists and political activists, MPs and ordinary people, offers a tantalising glimpse at another path.

Its aim - to draw together a broad coalition that transcends party boundaries around policies that will help the majority in Britain - is both commendable and essential.

The alternative just does not bear thinking about.

Labels: ,

Monday, May 25, 2009

Interview with Dave Hill who tops the No2EU list in the South East

Interview with Dave Hill who tops the No2EU list in the South East (Dave is in the middle of the picture). Article from the Mac Uaid blog. This article was first published in the The Weekly Worker when Dave Hill spoke to Peter Manson.

How do assess the campaign so far?

It’s the beginning. No2EU is a new party. The manifesto comes out on May 21 – the same day as the national television broadcast. In the meantime I am making a regional broadcast on The politics show.

We reckon that the South East is the area where we can get elected with the smallest percentage of the vote anywhere in the country – we only need about eight percent to get in. And we could be on line to do that – it depends on the way the national publicity goes – there’s only so much we can do locally.

We’ve got a vibrant local campaign – I must say, mainly run by the local Socialist Party, but also with the RMT and some independents.

There isn’t much by way of the Communist Party of Britain in your neck of the woods then?

No, not in the Brighton area. But in other parts of the region, yes, there are – in Kent, Oxford and Southampton, for example, the CPB is active. In the Brighton area, where I’m mainly going to meetings, doing interventions, etc, we have a group of young comrades from the SP.

I believe you’ve recently come out of retirement from politics?

Yes, I joined the Labour Party when I was 16 – I was brought up in poverty in fact. All my family are working class and I was a socialist from a very early age. I was a parliamentary candidate a couple of times. But in the early 90s I started to go deaf. At the same time I was getting pretty disgusted with Labour – this was before New Labour, under Kinnock – because of the expulsions, which I always opposed. I also decided it was time to concentrate on my career.

But then I got new hearing aids from the NHS about three years ago and it made a huge difference to my life – I could actually hear what people were saying! I left New Labour finally in 2005 after 40 years – most of my friends and comrades had left in tranches over the previous years. The sense of relief I felt was incredible.

I then joined what seemed at that particular time to be the major group on the left, Respect, and indeed the International Socialist Group.

Are you still in Respect?

I am a member, yes. I have been engaged in very vigorous attempts to get Respect involved in No2EU. When I saw the campaign was being set up, I immediately got in touch – then it was just the CPB, SP and RMT on board, so I got in at the beginning. I thought, wow, this is what I’ve been looking for for years – a reconfiguration on the left; a trade union-backed, working class-backed movement and hopefully party to the left of Labour.

Respect at that time was still considering standing and I was opposed to that. Since then Respect, I’m delighted to say, along with Socialist Resistance, has come on board and supported No2EU.

Isn’t it more a case of Respect leaving it open to individual members?

Well, you and I are both right. They have supported No2EU except where there are local considerations – we’re really just talking about the North West …

… where they’re voting Green.

My view is that the Greens are a bourgeois party – a lot of them are very good people – but they’re not a working class party and they are not socialist, even though individual members might be.

I could not believe it and I was very angry. My hope is that the layers that have been involved in Respect – that is to say, predominantly the middle and working class layers of the Muslim population and some others – will fully join No2EU. My hope is that after the election the promised convention does take place and I want to see the development of a democratic and pluralist party grow out of it.

But the main forces involved have divergent positions on that. The official position of the CPB is that No2EU is just an electoral platform and after June 4 it will cease to exist.

Well, you go round the blocks probably more than I do, so you will be well aware that there is a momentum building. If there is a tiny vote, then perhaps the momentum will be lost. But I think that by the time of the election No2EU will actually do well. There is a very good chance that there might be one or two MEPs elected, of whom I reckon to be one. The disgust with the mainstream parties is such that many people to the left of Labour have been looking for something substantial they can vote for.

But, to get back to the convention, history moves. I know the SP is very committed to the Campaign for a New Workers’ Party – which incidentally I support – and I think the CPB and RMT will come on board, and hopefully small groups like the Alliance for Green Socialism, which are also involved. I just hope that the momentum will be such that we are living in historic times, so that a successful party to the left of Labour will be launched some time in the next couple of months.

I see from your blog that you are part of the wing that is for taking up your seats if you get elected.

I’ve always admired the integrity of what was the Militant and SP and their position of a workers’ MP on a skilled worker’s wage – even though I’ve disagreed with them historically on various issues.

Here I’m going to be careful what I say – I think the historic position of working class parties and socialists seeking election has always, quite rightly in my view, been to take up those positions and to use them as a platform and an arena of mobilisation. In the South East election material – and indeed in the television and radio broadcast – I have been very firm about saying we are for a worker’s MP on a worker’s wage.

That’s an advance on the position on the website.

Absolutely. I think we should view No2EU as developmental, and that website was put up at the very beginning. I would like to see a development of that in the manifesto. What I’ve been saying when I’ve been interviewed is that we’re working class and socialist activists. We will be mainly in Britain, but of course we’ll be supporting workers’ slogans and workers’ issues in Europe. But there will no bathplugs or bungs on expenses for us!

We’ll be workers’ MPs on a worker’s wage, fighting for working class issues, rights, conditions and pay and opposing privatisation and neoliberalism.

It seems to me that the ‘Yes to democracy’ slogan is without content. It is posed in a way which suggests that the British parliament, House of Lords and monarchy is the alternative.

Yes, I agree with that 100%. I think a better slogan would have been ‘Yes to a workers’ democracy’ or ‘Yes to a socialist democracy’.

We have an article in the Weekly Worker calling for republican democracy.

I’m a convinced republican.

What we’re saying is: abolition of the monarchy and the second chamber, annual parliaments, as with the Chartists; recallable MPs on a worker’s wage, which you’ve already referred to; an end to the secret state …

… I haven’t thought about the annual parliaments, but I agree with retiring the monarchy and giving them all an old-age pension; and getting rid of the House of Lords and having an elected second chamber – if there is to be a second chamber. The term of the parliaments I’m not so sure about.

What I would say in defence of No2EU is, looking at the speeches of Bob Crow, Dave Nellist and various other comrades, it has been pretty clear that it is a leftwing, internationalist campaign that goes beyond the initially thought-up slogans.

I want to ask you about internationalism, but first can I put to you our last point on republican democracy? That is, replace the standing army with a popular militia and the constitutional right to bear arms, as in the United States. What do you reckon on that?

I haven’t given that any thought. I wouldn’t want to comment without doing so and discussing it.

OK, fair enough. Then let me take you up on what you said about internationalism. For example, the platform – which seems to be inspired by the worst part of the CPB’s programme of anti-EUism from a nationalist perspective – comes out against Fortress Europe, but gives every impression of being for ‘Fortress Britain’.

I fully understand what you’re saying and where you’re coming from. During an election campaign I’m not going to attack other constituent parts of the campaign of which I am a candidate.

What I would say is that in my view the enemy is capitalism, based in both the European Union and in Britain. They are the same. What I have been arguing for in the meetings I’ve been involved in is workers’ internationalism with no illusions in the sanctity of British capital. We’re a movement seeking to replace capitalism with socialism – and I’m not just talking about neoliberalism, which is simply the current version of the class war from above.

What I do think is that we’re living in tumultuous times. We’ve seen 30 years of incredible war on the workers since Thatcher and Reagan, and this is the chance that working class, socialist and progressive forces have to ally, nationally and internationally, to pose and to organise for a working class and socialist alternative to combat and replace capitalism.

If the platform read, ‘No to Fortress Europe, no to Fortress Britain’, how would that sound to you? In other words, for the free movement of labour.

I was a politician for many years, so I’m well used to not answering questions! What I will say is that the views expressed, for example, over the Lindsey refinery workers’ strike by the leaders of No2EU from all its sections have not been narrow little Englandism. What they have defended is the rights of all workers in Britain, wherever they might come from.

So I take heart not from the odd phrase that needs developing, but from the more lengthy phrases that No2EU speakers have been expressing on the stump and in public statements.

I agree with what you say about Lindsey and in fact I think the Socialist Party did a good job in helping to divert the strike away from the ‘British jobs’ slogan …

It was a dreadful slogan …

But that wasn’t actually the nature of the strike, which was to defend jobs. However, what about immigration controls? I’m against them.

Well, I’m not sure that the No2EU campaign has got a particular view on that …

What’s your view?

My personal view is that in my political life I’ve been opposed to racism and active in the Anti-Nazi League – and indeed was attacked on two occasions by fascists because of my leading local role in anti-fascist activity. My working life has involved teaching against race, gender and sexuality discrimination.

My view is that this is not a time to have completely open borders. On the other hand, I think that the current controls are racist and that people who are in this country should be treated with full human rights and have full workers’ rights. The conditions under which many refugees and asylum-seekers live are horrendous.

If ever – god forbid – there were a fascist government in this country, then people like me or you would have to seek asylum somewhere else unless we went underground. I would want us to be treated with full human rights and dignity and have the ability to lead a happy, healthy, safe and employed life.

So the anti-racist slant of No2EU is hugely important to me. I fear that now, unlike any time since the late 70s, when the left basically kicked the fascists off the streets, and unlike the 1930s, when the Battle of Cable Street did the same, the dangers of fascism and of a BNP revival are greater at this moment than at any time in the last 30 years. So we must have no truck with nationalistic slogans and must make very clear our internationalist and anti-racist beliefs.

Finally, I do hope that all of the left, including the CPGB, will come into No2EU and make it a democratic and pluralist organisation. I am including in that people like the Socialist Workers Party and Alliance for Workers’ Liberty – I am totally non-sectarian. I look with great hope to the new anti-capitalist party in France, the Bloco de Esquerda in Portugal and some of the experiences of Die Linke. That’s what I want this to develop into.

Editors Note: And on that hope Dave you have my full support - a position I will fight for on the National Council of Respect - Neil Williams

Labels: ,

Sunday, May 24, 2009

ALICE MAHON BACKS NO2EU

ALICE MAHON BACKS NO2EU - report from the Socialist Unity Web Site.

Alice Mahon, the former
Labour MP who resigned last month from the Labour Party after 50 years membership, will speak at her first public meeting since leaving the party in Birmingham on Tuesday, May 26th, in support of the No2EU campaign in the Euro elections.

Mrs Mahon, 71, was the Member of Parliament for Halifax from 1987 to 2005.

She joins a number of former Labour figures backing the anti-EU coalition - including the former leader of East Sussex Council Labour Group, Prof Dave Hill, former deputy Labour leader of Carlisle Council, John Metcalfe, and former election agent for Peter Shore MP, John Rowe, who are all candidates for No2EU on June 4th.

The former Labour MP for Coventry, Dave Nellist, is the lead candidate for the trade union backed campaign in the West Midlands.

Mrs Mahon in her resignation letter said she could no longer be a member of a party “that at leadership level has betrayed many of the principles that inspired me as a teenager to join”. Her letter, sent to former colleagues in her Halifax constituency, was sharply critical of Labour’s failure to deliver a promised referendum on the EU “Lisbon Treaty”.

“If that Treaty is ratified”, she wrote, “we can say goodbye to any publicly owned services…… we will be handing over to private corporations, social services, education, transport and postal services. Even the NHS will be up for grabs”.

Ms Mahon will be joined at the election rally on Tuesday, May 26th, 7.30pm at the Carrs Lane Church Centre, Birmingham by Brian Denny, national officer of the RMT trade union, and West Midlands No2EU candidates Cllr Dave Nellist, and Joanne Stevenson, the General Secretary of the Young Communist League.

Labels: ,

Can you help Southwark Respect? - No2EU activity in Southwark

Can you help Southwark Respect? - No2EU activity in Southwark.

Sunday 24 May - 11.00am - 1.00pm - leafleting

2.00pm - 4.00pm - leafleting


Monday 25 May - 11.00am - 1.00pm - leafleting
2.00pm - 4.00pm - leafleting
(If there are Bank Holiday events we will aim to cover them with leaflets.)


Tuesday 26 May - 6.30pm - leafleting


Thursday 28 May - 6.30pm - leafleting


Respect members/supporters - Can you help next weekend? - please call Ian on 07941936 087


Saturday 30 May - 11.00am - Stall (probably Camberwell. If we have enough people we will try to have more than one stall.)
2.00pm- leafleting
5.00pm- BARBECUE - This is for all supporters and to help raise funds for the Southwark Respect NO2EU leaflet, which has cost over £600.

Sunday 31 May - 11.00am - leafleting

2.00pm - leafleting


Monday 1 June - 7.00pm - NO2EU Public Meeting at Friends Meeting House - opposite Euston Station, with BOB CROW, lead candidate for London, DAVE NELLIST, lead candidate for West Midlands, and others


Tuesday 2 June - 6.30pm - leafleting


Wednesday 3 June - 6.30pm - leafleting


Thursday 4 June - POLLING DAY


Any inquiries - please call Ian on 07941936 087


We hope to see you over the next two weeks. Please try to make some of the activities.


Link: No2EU

Link: Southwark Respect

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

June 4 and beyond - Dave Nellist

June 4 and beyond - Dave Nellist.

Former Coventry Labour MP Dave Nellist is fighting a vigorous campaign as No2EU - Yes to Democracy's lead candidate in the West Midlands.

Now a Socialist Party councillor in the city, he recalls the 1975 referendum campaign, when the left was united in branding what was then called the European Common Market as "a bosses' club."

"The Labour manifesto on which I stood in 1983 was against the European Community," Nellist recalls. And he hasn't changed his mind since - although Labour has.

"Without No2EU, there would be a largely sterile debate in this forthcoming election, since all the three big parties agree with the free-market philosophy of the European Union - and the only opposition to the EU would come from the far-right.

"New Labour, particularly under Tony Blair's leadership, has become increasingly wedded to big business and so when, for the first time in 100 years, a trade union decided to stand independently in a national election, the Socialist Party wanted to help," he remarks.

In Nellist's view, past campaigns against the EU have suffered from a "confused identity," with business and right-wing politicians being involved.

"This campaign is based solidly on the working class and offers a socialist alternative which no other platform does," he enthuses.

In the West Midlands, Nellist identifies two key issues as jobs and the rise of the extreme right.

Unemployment is rising faster there than most other regions of Britain, which in turn accounts for one-third of all jobs lost in the EU since January.

"Major manufacturers have been taking advantage of the free movement of capital and labour promoted by the EU, to export jobs and factories to areas of Europe where trade unions are weak and wages are low," he says.

Nellist cites the local case of Peugeot at Ryton, where the firm shipped the factory to Slovakia to avoid paying decent trade union rates of pay at £500 per week.

"There, they can get away with paying £350 per month!" he says.

The export of jobs, the import of exploited labour and growing disillusionment with the main parties, particularly in working-class areas, has inflated support for the BNP. The fascists now have 16 councillors in the West Midlands EU region - a third of their national total - and regularly poll votes in the hundreds in local council elections.

"It's not that the people of the West Midlands are becoming more racist - for many, it's a protest vote," Nellist insists. "We intend to offer a trade union alternative to the barmy politics of the far-right."

He fears that merely portraying the BNP as Holocaust deniers - although he notes that "their leaders clearly are" - who believe that the wrong side won the second world war is not enough.

"I think you have to approach potential BNP voters differently," he argues. "Many of them are working class, formerly voted Labour and, in an election where most electors are switched off from the big parties mired in sleaze and scandal, they are unlikely to be won away from the BNP if their only other option is to support one of those establishment parties.

"Thanks to No2EU - Yes to Democracy, working people will be able to vote for a non-nationalist, anti-EU, left alternative in these elections."

And Nellist hopes that its impact will be felt beyond June 4.

"We hope No2EU will be the first step towards the development of a new mass left party. Given the severity of the economic crisis facing working-class people, this is now particularly urgent," he says.

He is particularly encouraged by the new networks being built up during the election campaign.

"Obviously, the organisations involved will want assess the project and their involvement in it - but I hope that after the June elections we can come together to jointly look at what comes next."

The diversity of the No2EU alliance has raised some eyebrows on the left. How does Nellist find sharing a bed with the Communist Party, for instance?

"What has happened is a growing realisation not only that the Labour Party is on a trajectory away from working-class people, but that the forces of the left still inside Labour do not appear to be strong enough to hold back the tide.

"The Socialist Party has always been prepared to work with other forces on the left in any project which advances the cause of the working class, whether that is on the industrial or the political front.

"Having consistently called for 15 years for the development of a serious left alternative to new Labour, we were very pleased that the RMT, the Communist Party and others wanted to form an electoral bloc for the European elections."

On a more personal note, Nellist downplays his own position as lead candidate in the West Midlands. He certainly doesn't miss the Westminster Parliament in which he sat for nine years.

"I found the privileged gentlemen's club atmosphere very unpleasant and, unlike some former MPs who have haunted the place since they left, I've only been back five times in 17 years," he points out.

"Like fellow Militant supporters Terry Fields and Pat Wall, I took only a worker's wage. That made sure we were not sucked into the unreal world we see in recent revelations, but remained in touch with our working-class constituents."

Nellist spent much of his time as an MP campaigning outside Parliament, notably against the poll tax.

"That balance of work - predominantly outside Parliament and involved in working-class struggles - is what I'd like to see any successful No2EU MEP doing," he says.

"Whether it's me is not really the issue, but there clearly is a desperate need for more politicians who don't have their snouts in the trough and stand up for the millions instead of the millionaires," he concludes.

And millions of people in sleaze-ridden Britain today will agree with that.

Labels: , ,

The dangers of anti-politics - Jeremy Corbyn

The dangers of anti-politics - Jeremy Corbyn.

Monday was one of those surreal days that happen at Westminster.

Parliament Square and the streets around were blockaded for most of the day by Tamil people, desperately worried about families and loved ones in Vanni as news of the Sri Lankan army's final push came through.

Later, as news of Velupillai Prabhakaran's death was reported, the crowds became bigger and more angry.

Last Saturday, a march in Birmingham asked for government action to protect jobs and save companies in the recession.

Another march in London expressed support for the Palestinian people and demanded a new policy towards Israel.

Parliament, on the other hand, was discussing MPs' expenses, or, more prosaically, the additional costs allowance.

The long-drawn-out saga of MPs' battle to get out of having to disclose their expense claims in response to a request issued under the Freedom of Information Act finally ended with agreement to publish all the details... in July.

The Daily Telegraph jumped the gun, having apparently bought the information from a stolen disk, and has been publishing ever since. Non-London MPs have been able to claim up to £23,000 per year and the effects have been dramatic in media and political terms.

Obviously, those who make fraudulent claims should suffer the consequences and equally obviously the system needs a big change.

Michael Martin as Speaker vainly tried to make an appropriate statement on Monday but, if anything, only managed to make the situation worse.

This is one of the few issues relating to Parliament that has sustained the interest of both the "heavy" papers and the tabloids at the same time and consequently has filled the airwaves of chat shows and dominated most political programmes.

But what initially emerged as an understandable anger and revulsion at individual examples of excessive claims has now become, first, a contest between the party leaders - in which Cameron has had the easiest ride - and, second, an attack on politics as a whole.

In the failure of MPs to get to grips with public feeling, a space has been created for other forces.

These are not progressive forces but the harbingers of desperation and doubt.

Thus UKIP has apparently gained much ground ahead of the European elections and the BNP is already making hay.

Strange, as one of UKIP's MEPs has spent most of the time since his election in prison for fraud, while the BNP's racist policies and the record of its candidates go unchallenged in most of the media.

We now have an openly right-wing agenda designed to ignore the issues of the recession, the massive bail-out of the banks and the bonuses paid to directors, and which focuses only on attacking democracy.

Unless Labour can get to grips with this and provide a viable alternative, the ground is open for a Conservative government and a frightening rise in intolerance and the far right.

But this anti-democratic atmosphere has its antecedents in the 1980s and the rise of new Labour.

Essentially, the economic strategies of Reagan and Thatcher came down to money being everything - how it was made was irrelevant. Thus asset stripping, tax cutting, privatisation of public services and impoverishment of the poorest became articles of faith.

New Labour under Blair sought to accommodate these attitudes and, while they did invest in public service improvements, they also went even further in deregulating financial services and threatened - and carried out - privatisation of public services.

At no stage did new Labour ever challenge the notion that public services run by publicly employed people are intrinsicially better than private services run for profit by unaccountable companies. New Labour also demonstrated an attitude to welfare and means testing that has no place in socialist thinking at all.

These attitudes did not stop at government policy. They were the product of a wider agenda.

The whole new Labour project was to weaken and ultimately destroy the link between trade unions and the Labour Party and to ensure that its funding came from the wealthy and influential, who gradually became the main source of income.

This has led to a loss of party members, a reduction in activity and a whole movement vulnerable to the anti-politics debate through disillusionment. A weak and unfocused Labour movement at a time of recession is the perfect breeding ground for the far right.

The saga of the Speaker, the expenses, the claims and the ridicule will be played out in the next few weeks and we may even end up with a more accountable system and openness as a result. The damage, however, will extend to the very idea of representative democracy.

Unless the labour movement can deliver protection of the poorest in the recession, permanent control of the banks and the banking system and provision of homes, jobs and opportunities, then we leave ourselves vulnerable to the far right.

Essentially the BNP and UKIP are the same thing. The BNP has all the accoutrements of a fascist party - UKIP are much the same but with blazers and more refined accents.

Their message is one of despair and division, blaming the poorest and most vulnerable migrant workers for the economic failures of a system built on greed and exploitation.

Opposing the BNP means campaigning for high electoral participation to minimise their influence and adopting policies of substance for those most affected by the recession.

Parliament must urgently get its house in order and be seen to be of relevance. The alternative is a return to naked monetarism and its enforcement by fear and bigotry.

Labels:

Speaker Martin: a prize scalp for English snobs - George Galloway

Speaker Martin: a prize scalp for English snobs - George Galloway.

English snobbery can do a morris dance of delight at the political demise of the Speaker, Michael Martin. The bigots have put the taigs back in their place. Above all the MPs desperately seeking solace from the evisceration of the expenses scandal hope this will be enough to staunch the haemorrhage in public confidence.

For a certain class of Englishman every Catholic is a Mick and every working-class Scot is from the Gorbals. In fact, Michael Martin – it was always Michael! – has no connection to the Gorbals, but his elevation was a fillip to both: the first manual worker to sit in that ancient seat and the first Catholic since Cromwell to surmount the still considerable prejudice. Thanks to Speaker Martin my grandson Sean enjoyed the first Catholic baptism in the House of Commons Crypt since Cromwell turned it into a stable.

His accent never cut through the cut-glass ceiling, he appeared mentally sluggish and the arcane vocabulary of great parliamentary occasions seemed beyond him. His tearoom skills are what had landed him the job. He lay in wait for a generation of MPs to charm avuncularly. Government office was never likely to come his way, and a remaining parliamentary lifetime of high teas and grand tours seemed ample compensation.

But that which seemed charming and solicitous offstage in the warren of Westminster was cruelly exposed in the unforgiving glare of the television lights. It was Martin's bad luck to have been caught up in a maelstrom of crises andpublic odium. He did not invent the discredited system of parliamentary allowances – that came largely under the "distinguished" speakership of Lord Weatherill and became especially lucrative during the golden era of Betty Boothroyd. Under both, MPs believed that allowances were but a supplementary salary, their receipts notional and in any case highly secret. The consistent deferment of recommended salary increases, the tearoom mafia would nod and wink, justified this deceit.

But caught in the white heat of this unprecedented focus, the former sheet-metal worker melted. He might have avoided the complete destruction had he decided to leave over the Damian Green affair where policemen were allowed to trample through the parliamentary estate on a political witchhunt of an opposition politician merely doing his job. If Martin didn't know they needed a warrant to be there he was too stupid to be Speaker; if he knew but turned a blind eye then he was too wicked. But that was also an opportunity. He could have admitted an error, apologised humbly and gone back to Springburn with a grain of respect left. MPs might have even shaken his hand for doing the decent thing while looking over his shoulder for a successor.

Martin's fall from grace is necessary but not sufficient. The election of a new Speaker in this parliament will be effected by the same people who brought it into disrepute. Similarly the "constitutional convention" now being touted would merely be a conclave of the self-regarding great and good and the conclusions would crucially lack credibility in the harsh public spotlight. Only a new parliament where the public have cast judgment on those who have disgraced our political life can be trusted to set in place the new dispensation.

We need a revolution in public life, halving the size of the lower house, and directly electing the revising chamber – all by proportional representation. We need transparent and contemporary disclosure of all financial details – publish the income tax returns and all details of perks, outside jobs and jollies. Party funding and election spending decisions must be part and parcel of the reform. None of this can be done by the current discredited House of Commons.

Labels:

Monday, May 18, 2009

Southwark Respect backs No2EU

Southwark Respect backs No2EU.
Nick Wrack, Southwark Respect and No2EU candidate in London, writes:

Southwark Respect has decided to support to No2EU in the Euro Elections in London. Other branches of Respect have also voted to back it.

The NO2EU list in the capital is headed by Bob Crow, leader of the rail workers union, the RMT and the most militant union in the country.

Other candidates in London include Kevin Nolan, convener of the Visteon workers in Enfield.

NO2EU is an important initiative that that seeks to pose an alternative for working class people to vote for across the country. It is backed by the RMT, many other trade unionists, the CPB and the Socialist Party.

The European Union is a bosses club. Its purpose is to create a Europe in which there are no barriers to big business and to allow the free rule of the market.

It is the EU that has been the greatest force for deregulation and privatisation across the continent in recent years.

Laws passed by the European parliament and the decisions of the European Court have undermined workers’ rights. The posted workers directive, which was at the centre of the Lindsey dispute, is only the best-known example in this country.

The neo-liberal Europe being pushed by the EU must be opposed.

Up until now in this country the arguments against the EU have mostly come from the right.

They create fear that it is scheming foreigners who want to undermine our way of life and whip up feeling against migrant workers.

Yet it has been British governments, whether Labour or Tory, that have pushed most enthusiastically for privatisation and deregulation in the EU.

No2EU stands for international workers solidarity. It is an opportunity to undermine the racist lies of the right.

Mainstream politics is dominated by a deadening consensus. Despite the economy sliding into the greatest crisis since in fifty years the differences between the major parties are miniscule.

Rather than reject the economic policies that have led to this crisis Gordon Brown’s government is giving us more of the same. Rather than taking the failed banking system into full state control and using it for the good of ordinary people they have thrown billions to the bankers.

And we will be paying for this for a generation to come. Whoever forms the next government they will push for massive cuts in public spending and services.

New Labour has betrayed the working class and accepted the bosses’ agenda lock stock and barrel.

They have betrayed the hopes that millions put in them in 1997. This has created conditions for the growth of the BNP and other parties of the right.

To resist the shift to the right, and to defend working class people against the crisis and the inevitable attacks on jobs, wages and conditions that it will bring, the working class needs a political alternative that can gain mass support. The working class needs a new party to represent it. That is the reason why Respect was formed five years ago.

In 1901 the RMT (the NUR as it then was) became one of the founding members of the Labour party because it realised the labour movement needed its own political voice. In 2004 it was expelled from that same party.

The fact that it is now one of the main moving forces behind No2EU is of massive importance. It is a sure sign that many in the labour movement now see the necessity to pose an electoral alternative to the neo-liberal consensus.

NO2EU is a temporary platform for the European elections, not a new party. Mistakes will be made, but lessons will also be learnt. But that is why we welcome this and support every step taken by the labour movement to find its own political voce again.

That is why in these elections we will be campaigning for No2EU.

Link: To find what Southwark Respect will be doing to support NO2EU click here

Link: To contact Southwark Respect click here

Link: For the No2EU – Yes to Democracy website click here

Labels:

No2EU - Yes to Democracy

No2EU - Yes to Democracy is a coalition of trade unionists, political parties and campaigning groups which have come together to defend democracy here and across the European Union, so lend us your vote in the Euro elections on June 4.
No2EU-Yes to Democracy is a response to the growing cynicism across Europe towards the undemocratic direction the EU is taking and to the rise of extremists like the BNP who are benefiting from this disillusionment. Come to one of our public meetings and find out more.

Keep your public services public
:
The Lisbon Treaty and the EU’s privatisation agenda represent a significant threat to working class communities and to the services we all rely on.

The renamed EU consttituion forces governments to hand public services over to private corporations – that means handing fat cats control of railways, schools, postal services, energy and even social services across Europe.

Under Article III-147 of the EU Constitution: “A European framework law shall establish measures to achieve the liberalisation of a specific service”. That provision remains in the Lisbon Treaty.

This commitment to ‘free competition’ enshrined in successive EU treaties was the main reason that Tories originally supported the EU. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act in 1986 to establish a single European market and John Major agreed the Maastricht Treaty, which created the Euro, the European Central Bank and tied European economies into a ‘Growth and Stability Pact’ that squeezes public investment in public services.
The current economic crisis was created by these discredited neo-liberal policies yet, under the Lisbon Treaty, they become constitutional goals. We should be defending public services in Britain not allowing bankers and eurocrats take them over in order to make money for big business in Europe.

Vote No2EU - Yes to Democracy to defend public services such as Post Offices and the NHS and to renationalise our railways and develop manufacturing in Britain (see web site for more policies).
Now read this:
Southwark Respect backs No2EU
Link: No2EU Facebook site
Link:
No2EU National Web site

Labels: