19 Aug 2014

Fresh Push For Treaty Emerges From Shadow Of Recognise Campaign

By Amy McQuire

While currently the focus is on constitutional reform, a new video renews calls for treaty with First Nations, writes Amy McQuire.

A new YouTube campaign, narrated by Aboriginal actress Kylie Belling and featuring a number of strong Aboriginal women, has been launched to reinvigorate the call for a treaty.

The group Concerned Australians, which is supported by people like former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser and former Chief Justice of the Children’s Court Alastair Nicholson, launched the YouTube video today.

In it, Ms Belling, who starred in The Sapphires and The Fringe Dwellers, calls on governments to finally recognise Aboriginal control over their own lives and futures.

The video charts the beginnings of dispossession, the broken Hawke promise to sign a treaty with Aboriginal nations, and presents a harrowing portrait of the rights abuses under the Northern Territory intervention.

A number of strong Aboriginal women are seen voicing their concerns. Yolngu elder Djapirri Mununggirritj, in a powerful statement says: “We Indigenous are a people of pride. We’re not invisible. We do exist. We do live in a culture that is alive today.”

Arrente/Amatjere leader Rosalie Kunoth-Monks says: “How much longer do we have to pay the price of being blacks of this country? How much longer do we have to keep coming cap in hand?”

Bagot community leader Joy White is also filmed telling a forum of the importance of land to Aboriginal equality: “Unless we get our rights back as Aboriginal people of this land, unless we get that back, there is no hope for Aboriginal people because the government will still condemn us every way we can.”


The short video calls on a treaty, compact or agreements to be made with Aboriginal nations.

Belling says, “We are Sovereign peoples, who have never ceded our land.
We want to take control over our lives and determine our futures, through legal agreements, compacts, covenants or treaties established in law and enforceable through the courts.

“The time is long overdue for governments to sit down with Aboriginal people across Australia and negotiate agreements and return to us our rights.”

The last time a treaty was seriously on the political agenda was in the late 80s and early 90s, when Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke promised a treaty during the life of the parliament.

Hawke never delivered, just as he failed to deliver a promised national land rights model after bowing to the big mining lobby.

One of Hawke’s last acts as Prime Minister saw him was hang the Barunga Statement in Parliament, a bark painting which calls for a treaty.

Hawke cried as he did, saying he wished he had done more for Aboriginal Australia.

The Barunga Statement is still hanging in a shadowed corner of Parliament (near the main committee room), largely forgotten.

Hawke’s successor Paul Keating spearheaded the Reconciliation movement during his reign, and presided over the Native Title Act, which swept the momentum for treaty and national land rights under the table.

But Aboriginal people have continued to call for treaty ever since. Prominent Murri writer and academic Nicole Watson has written in the past she believes a treaty is inevitable, and that the majority of the intellectual heavy lifting has already been completed.

Internationally, nations like New Zealand, the United States and Canada signed treaties with their First Peoples long ago.

John Pilger’s recent documentary Utopia, which documented the current state of Aboriginal Australia, including the lies that built the Northern Territory intervention, ended with a call for treaty.

You can watch the Concerned Australians video here.

Log in or register to post comments

Discuss this article

To control your subscriptions to discussions you participate in go to your Account Settings preferences and click the Subscriptions tab.

Enter your comments here

Disturbed
Posted Tuesday, August 19, 2014 - 23:36

Looks like a " Bill of Rights" in the constitution would be a tool to force a move toward treaties .

This user is a New Matilda supporter. DrGideonPolya
Posted Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 08:19

The refusal of the racist  Lib-Labs (Liberal-Laborals, Coalition and Labor Right) to make a Treaty with surviving Indigenous Australian Indigenous Peoples  illustrates the profound  lack of Respect and Empathy by the genocidally racist  Lib-Labs  for Indigenous Peoples that lies at the heart of the ongoing Aboriginal Genocide and Aboriginal Ethnocide.

It is important  to summarize the main features of the ongoing Australian  Aboriginal Genocide and Aboriginal Ethnocide. Before the British Invasion in 1788, Indigenous Australians had  been living in Australia for about 60,000 years. There were 350-750 different tribes and a similar number of languages and dialects, of which only 150 survive today and of these all but about 20 are endangered.  After the brutish British Invasion, the Aboriginal population dropped from about 1 million in 1788 to about 0.1 million in the first century through introduced  disease, deprivation and genocidal violence. The last massacres of Aborigines occurred in the 1920s but no Treaty has ever been signed. Indigenous Australians were only counted  after a referendum in 1967 and were finally given some protection by the 1975 Racial Discrimination Act but this protection was removed for NT Aboriginals  by the  racist Lib-Lab NT Intervention.

In the 20th century up to 1 in 10 Aboriginal children were forcibly removed from their mothers, the so-called Stolen Generations, but despite the “Sorry” by Labor PM Kevin Rudd this is continuing  at record levels . In 2000 about 9,000 Aborigines out of an Aboriginal  population of 500,000 died avoidably  every year (1.8% pa as compared to an avoidable death rate of 2.5% pa  for Australian sheep, 1.0% pa for sub-Saharan Africa,  0.4% pa for South Asia and 0% pa for Cuba) but this had declined to about 2,000 annual avoidable deaths out of a population about 670,000 (0.3% pa) by 2011. Indigenous Australians are far worse off than White Australians in relation to housing, health, wealth, social conditions, imprisonment, avoidable death and life expectancy (see “Aboriginal Genocide” : https://sites.google.com/site/aboriginalgenocide/ ; Gideon Polya, “ Ongoing Aboriginal Genocide And Aboriginal Ethnocide By Politically Correct Racist Apartheid Australia ”, Countercurrents, 16 February 2014: http://www.countercurrents.org/polya160214.htm  ;  and Gideon Polya, “ Film Review: “Utopia” by John Pilger exposes genocidal maltreatment of Indigenous Australians by Apartheid Australia”,  Countercurrents, 14 March, 2014: http://www.countercurrents.org/polya140314.htm ).

The ongoing Aboriginal Genocide is one of 30 genocides with which White Australia has been associated and indeed in some cases continues  be associated with (see Gideon Polya, “Review: The Cambridge History  of Australia ignores Australian involvement  in 30 genocides”, Countercurrents, 14 March 2014: http://www.countercurrents.org/polya140314.htm ). Indeed the Lib-Labs are the strongest supporters after the Zionist-perverted and Zionist-subverted US for democracy-by-genocide neo-Nazi Apartheid Israel and its ongoing genocide of Indigenous Palestinians. However the Indigenous Palestinians  have now secured UN recognition of the State of Palestine  (the racist Coalition opposed this, and the cowardly  racist Labor Government abstained at the UN vote) and Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against neo-Nazi Apartheid Israel are growing worldwide.

Indigenous Australians should realize that they will get no joy from the deeply, pathologically, violently, and genocidally  racist Lib-Labs and,  following the example of the Indigenous Palestinians,  should (a) seek international and UN recognition for Statehood of the First Nations of Australia  and (b) urge national and international  Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against the genocidally racist Lib-Labs and  their genocidally racist supporters.

fightmumma
Posted Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 12:25

A treaty approach will work far more effectively than a "reconciliation" process.  Firstly reconilication was able to be manipulated to definitions and interests not of Indigenous Australians, but to the interest of mainstream, dominant Australia - sort of a "this is a nuisance of a problem so let's do something enough that it is no longer annoying"...ie to the majority of Australia.  This might seem insignificant, but what that attitude does is remove Indigenous voices from the dialogue and discourse - it reinforces existing power relationships that perpetuate disadvantage, discrimination, and marginalisation.  It limits the role of Indigenous peoples in resolving their own issues, their own culturally-relevant ways, by their own definitions, values and beliefs.

A treaty on the other hand, by definition means Indigenous people must be included in all processes surrounding its formation.  It forces the state to listen to them, to HEAR them (very different and important distinction to make!!!) and shape decisions in way that meet Indigenous people's needs/interests/values.  A treaty, I believe, is also much harder to BS about, it cannot be as "symbolic" and tokenistic, as what the reconciliation attempts seemd to be.

It is time Australia did this. 

Syd Walker
Posted Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 18:17

I like the idea of a treaty (or treaties) between contemporary Aboriginal Australians and the Government of Australia on behalf of the entire community.

I would appreciate more information about how Aborigional people, such as the author, believe this could be achieved, because that isn't clear to me at present.

Is there a document or video which explains this more fully?

jules s
Posted Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 20:40

Whom is gonna make treaties with who?

What aboriginal organisations are independent enough/have so few ties to Australian legal systems that they able to make a treaty on behalf of indigenous people in a way that isn't compromised by the organisations dependence on Australian Legal Recognition.

For example if ATSIC were still around there couldn't be a treaty between Australian Govt and ATSIC because ATSIC is empowered by the Australian Govt.  Land council's are in a similar boat.

How are they independent enough of Australian Law to accurately represent the needs and wants of various blackfella communities, especially given their pre-invasion position?  To call any agreement made today a "treaty" would be an insult to the blackfella nations/mobs and to the idea of a treaty.

 

That said there has to be something - tho what I dunno.

Tjanara
Posted Friday, August 22, 2014 - 07:50

Thank you all for ur thoughts & reflections/history & failed govt policies - Hawke did his best with OUR request for a treaty - power politics got in the way - Keating did what he knew would be more palatable to the dominant population ( & I was there when his Minister came to the NAC & TOLD told the elected Aboriginal leaders leaders the next Aboriginal policy would be Reconciliation & they told him to shove it because we didn't need reconciliation the the 'whites' did but we'd listen - the decade of Reconcilation impacted so dodo much change towards us in the mainstream culture -  it was a good policy for the time & a visionary one which which did produce change & more deep respect for for us as a peoples - it doesn't work now because because it's optional - we have always called for Sovereignty but legally it's difficult ( but not impossible) so this majority voice is ignored in favour favour of a Treaty which 200+ yrs later is legally useless as it can be ignored in practice by a govt. The only path path which would lay the fight to rest is the recognition of sovereignty as that is the root cause of the tension & dissent - the currentConstitutional debate referendum idea idea is a smokescreen ( albeit removing racist clauses is useful) ...... People read ask us , listen & share & we can all debate it as a country can't we.... & come to some decisions about the future together for all our benefits - adversarial actions is not part of our Law .... We would rather we would rather do it together....it's OUR country now - it's not us & u mob......anymore is it? Tj