Paul Ryan’s Phony Budget – Taxes Today for Promises Tomorrow
We now know that despite all the smoke and mirrors Paul Ryan’s budget was primarily a way to reinstate defense sequester cuts. For all its posturing about what future congresses should do, e.g. reforming Medicare and social security, his real budget proposes to take away tax deductions and preferences so as to spend more on the Pentagon.
Ryan was always a big Iraq war fan. An excellent analysis by Jonathan Bydlak at the Coalition to Reduce Spending, Ryan Budget shows how little difference there is between the Parties, states that he "ignores the vast and wide-ranging examples of waste and duplication. To neglect even obvious examples of waste in favor of defending more Pentagon spending at all costs – while proclaiming one’s fiscal conservatism – is the height of hypocrisy." Ryan’s net effect is to take away mortgage interest and other tax deductions to pay for eliminating the defense sequester.
Because of his inordinate influence in Washington, Ryan’s own words deserve scrutiny. Writing "A Clear Choice on Defense, he argues that defense spending is "just 18% of the federal budget" without explaining that it is 55% of spending excluding social security and Medicare. He, like many others in Washington, obfuscates real cuts by mixing up yearly spending with 10 year fantasies. Then he repeats the threat that, with cutbacks, America would have the fewer warships since World War I and fewer Air Force planes. Well, in the old days a ship might fire a hundred or even a thousand shells to hit a target. Today it can be hit with one missile or guided bomb. I remember during the Korean War it took the Air Force 6 months to destroy the bridges on the Yalu River bringing in supplies from China. Today it could be done safely from far away, not risking air crews, with one missile. It’s the Pentagon and Congress that cause fewer ships and planes being built because they’ve been so awash in money since 9/11. Congress should focus on reforming their waste, not just spending more. Beyond that America needs weaponry for the 21st century, not more old stuff much of which is designed to re-fight World War II battles.
For Ryan there is no waste in military spending. Nowhere does he propose any sort of reforms or cutbacks, even as we end two wars which each cost some $10 billion per month. Ryan blames the proposed decommissioning of the A-10 ground support plane on Obama. But it is the Air Force which wants rather to spend its money on the gold plated F-35 fighter plans, at over 300 million dollars apiece, depending upon how one calculates the numbers. Earlier we published 16 Ways to Cut Defense Spending, which details some of the waste and potential savings available. Readers can compare its proposals against Ryan’s spending.
Ron Paul deciphered Ryan’s "budget" in Another Phony Budget Debate, "The Republicans are using the old DC trick of spending less than originally planned and calling that reduced spending increase a $5.1 trillion cut in spending. Only in DC could a budget that increases spending by 3.5 percent per year instead of by 5.2 percent per year be attacked as a "slash-and-burn" plan. Last week’s budget debate showed how little difference there lies between the parties when it comes to preserving the warfare-welfare state. One side may prefer more warfare while the other prefers more welfare, but neither side actually wants to significantly reduce the size and scope of government."
The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, said "the greatest threat to our national security is our debt." In the final analysis Ryan is not a leader, he’s just another puppet of the military industrial complex. If he really cared about American defense he would take up some of the many ways to stop wasting money and make America truly stronger and more competent.
Read more by Jon Basil Utley
- Benghazi, Mali, and the Need for a Defensive American Strategy – January 27th, 2013
- Romney, War, and the Republican Base: Libertarians May Split – September 24th, 2012
- Polling the Right Questions on Defense – Voters Get It Right – April 4th, 2012
- Call It the ‘Militarism Budget’ – March 14th, 2011
- J Street Offers Alternative to AIPAC – March 6th, 2011
Paul Ryan’s Phony Budget – Taxes Today for Promises Tomorrow | Der Blogpusher
April 30th, 2014 at 9:36 pm
[…] Paul Ryan’s Phony Budget – Taxes Today for Promises Tomorrow […]
John G
April 30th, 2014 at 10:39 pm
The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, said "the greatest threat to our national security is our debt."
Amazing that you can get to the top of the tree and be utterly economically illiterate. The so called national debt is no threat to anyone.
Duglarri
April 30th, 2014 at 10:51 pm
America currently has 2500 less biplanes than it had at the end of World War I, and as few Zeppelins as any time in the history of the country. How can we possibly be secure?
Dwight
May 1st, 2014 at 4:49 am
How preposterous a statement to say the national debt we have is not a threat to this nation's well being. There are too many ways that is true to list here but only an economic and historical illiterate could believe a permanent state of war and wasteful military mobilization, which is what the Ryan "budget" effectively calls for, is in any nation's genuine national interest. Is this comment by John G. a spoof by Rep. Ryan, or some other war fanatic such as Bill Kristol?
outsider
May 1st, 2014 at 9:04 am
John G – Please explain why the "national debt is no threat to anyone."
outsider
May 1st, 2014 at 9:09 am
Paul Ryan is no deficit hawk. He's just another in a long line of neocon phonies.
John G
May 1st, 2014 at 6:00 pm
The net 'national debt' is about 11 trillion. These are financial assets held by the private and foreign sectors of the economy i.e. dollars that have been spent into existence by the federal government and have accumulated as excess reserves in the banking system.
It is existing money and it doesn't get 'paid back' from somewhere else. The US government can never ever be bankrupt in the currency which it itself is the sole monopoly issuer of.
The entire debt, deficit, balanced budgets 'debate' is a hoax by the rich and powerful to make people believe that money is a scarce commodity and that government is 'funded' by the private sector.
It's all bullshit.
John G
May 1st, 2014 at 6:01 pm
I'm not agreeing with Ryan and I certainly don't agree with military spending, warfare or empire.
@ReikoDWinkler
May 4th, 2014 at 2:20 pm
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Wel, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do,
➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜➜ WWW.YELLWORK.COM
Rep. Paul Ryan: Fake Budget Hawk; Warfare State Bag Man | David Stockman's Contra Corner
May 15th, 2014 at 8:06 am
[…] Paul Ryan’s Phony Budget – Taxes Today for Promises Tomorrow […]