16:52
Instructions and Teachings of Amenemope (Part 1)
Introduction on the instructions and teachings of Sage Amenemope. (This video has numerous...
published: 18 Sep 2011
author: Sehu Khepera Ankh
Instructions and Teachings of Amenemope (Part 1)
Instructions and Teachings of Amenemope (Part 1)
Introduction on the instructions and teachings of Sage Amenemope. (This video has numerous pauses, please excuse this).- published: 18 Sep 2011
- views: 233
- author: Sehu Khepera Ankh
8:01
Instructions of Amenemope (How to Construe the Teachings)
Excerpt from Sehu Khepera's teaching on the Instructions of Amenemope on how to construe t...
published: 24 Sep 2011
author: Sehu Khepera Ankh
Instructions of Amenemope (How to Construe the Teachings)
Instructions of Amenemope (How to Construe the Teachings)
Excerpt from Sehu Khepera's teaching on the Instructions of Amenemope on how to construe the teachings. This segment is titled: Understanding of Wisdom.- published: 24 Sep 2011
- views: 124
- author: Sehu Khepera Ankh
11:07
Premiere of the documentary film "Maurice and the Pharaoh" at the GUST Kuwait
This video celebrates the successful premiere of the documentary film 'Maurice and the Pha...
published: 11 Jan 2011
author: AlfarouqChannel
Premiere of the documentary film "Maurice and the Pharaoh" at the GUST Kuwait
Premiere of the documentary film "Maurice and the Pharaoh" at the GUST Kuwait
This video celebrates the successful premiere of the documentary film 'Maurice and the Pharaoh' held on the November 8th 2010 at Kuwait's Gulf University for...- published: 11 Jan 2011
- views: 842
- author: AlfarouqChannel
9:38
In a Coffin in Egypt - Jonathan Gray (4 of 7)
International explorer & archaeologist Jonathan Gray surveys some of the ancient historica...
published: 01 Mar 2010
author: AllOtherNamesUsed
In a Coffin in Egypt - Jonathan Gray (4 of 7)
In a Coffin in Egypt - Jonathan Gray (4 of 7)
International explorer & archaeologist Jonathan Gray surveys some of the ancient historical and archaeological evidence for Joseph's time as viceroy under Ph...- published: 01 Mar 2010
- views: 3194
- author: AllOtherNamesUsed
9:32
In a Coffin in Egypt - Jonathan Gray (6 of 7)
International explorer & archaeologist Jonathan Gray surveys some of the ancient historica...
published: 01 Mar 2010
author: AllOtherNamesUsed
In a Coffin in Egypt - Jonathan Gray (6 of 7)
In a Coffin in Egypt - Jonathan Gray (6 of 7)
International explorer & archaeologist Jonathan Gray surveys some of the ancient historical and archaeological evidence for Joseph's time as viceroy under Ph...- published: 01 Mar 2010
- views: 2234
- author: AllOtherNamesUsed
45:00
Proverbs 21 & 22
Proverbs 21 & 22
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one...
published: 17 Sep 2013
Proverbs 21 & 22
Proverbs 21 & 22
Proverbs 21 & 22 Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that the background of Proverbs seems to be the royal court at Jerusalem. Although wisdom lit. in the ancient Near E antedates Proverbs by more than a thousand years, the particular form of instructions addressed to "my son" seems more like the Egypt. works The Instructions of Ptahhotep, The Instructions of Meri-ka-Re, The Instructions of Amen-en-het, and The Instructions of Ani. The marriage of Solomon to Pharaoh's daughter may have led to his interest in such instruction. Individual literary features such as the מָשָׁל֒, H5442, the X, X + 1 pattern, and the long, connected discourses, have parallels in earlier Sem. lit. The work appealed to readers already familiar with that literary form. II. Unity Since the book itself indicates that it is a collection, its unity is not bound up with its authorship. Rather, its unity is found in the general nature of its contents. The work belongs to the general category of wisdom lit.; it extols the virtues of wisdom and condemns the vices of folly. III. Authorship Traditionally, the bulk of Proverbs has been attributed to Solomon (cf. 1:1; 10:1; 25:1). The book itself mentions two other authors: Agur (30:1) and Lemuel (31:1). There are two extreme positions: (1) Solomon wrote the entire work, or (2) he had no connection with it (except as the traditional "patron saint" of wisdom lit.). A third viewpoint, more in keeping with the Biblical testimony, is that Solomon wrote most of the book, and the work of others was added to his. Paterson's statement, "Proverbs have no father" (Wisdom of Israel, p. 62) is only a partial truth. Whereas wisdom sayings often originate among ordinary folk, some one person must have been the first one to utter the epigrammatic statement. One objection to Solomonic authorship has been that Solomon did not practice the virtues Proverbs inculcated (cf. Prov 7:6-23). The same objection, however, could be used against Franklin's authorship of Poor Richard's Almanac. Writing wisdom and living wisely are two different things. The account of Solomon in 1 Kings 3; 4; and 10; esp. 4:30-34; and 2 Chronicles 9:1-24 indicates his traditional wisdom and versatility in composing wisdom sayings. Hence the assertion that the superscriptions (1:1; 10:1; 25:1) are merely honorific fails to do justice to Solomon. Also, one would expect to find the equivalent of "the men of Hezekiah" (25:1) at 1:1 and 10:1. Sheldon Blank's argument that the doublets within a section or in two sections rule out a single authorship overlooks the fact that authors repeated themselves and editors of collections retained duplicate passages (cf. Ps 14:1 with Ps 53:1). The question of the authorship of 22:17-24:34 is bound up with the problem of the section's relationship to The Wisdom of Amenemope, which is discussed below. In the 1st cent. a.d. Jewish controversy over the canon, Proverbs was classed with Ecclesiastes and Song of Solomon as "Solomonic," according to Shabbat 30b. The book as it now exists must come after the time of Hezekiah (25:1). Fritsch (IB, IV, p. 775) thinks the final form may be later than 400 b.c. Others assert that the final collection was assembled sometime between the days of Hezekiah and the early postexilic period. IV. Date Two distinct questions are involved in the dating of Proverbs. The first concerns the date of the writing of each section. The second deals with the date of the collection or "editing" of the various sections into one book (scroll). Conservative scholars have followed the traditional view of Solomonic authorship of all except chs. 30, 31. Therefore they date the bulk of the book in the 10th cent. b.c., prob. from Solomon's later years. The collection of the various sections usually is dated by conservatives between 700 b.c. and 400 b.c. (e.g., Hubbard, NBD, p. 1050, dates the collection in the 5th cent.). Commentary By Dr. J. Vernon McGee © Thru the Bible Radio Network, www.ttb.org.- published: 17 Sep 2013
- views: 0
34:05
Proverbs 12 & 13
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that th...
published: 06 Sep 2013
Proverbs 12 & 13
Proverbs 12 & 13
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that the background of Proverbs seems to be the royal court at Jerusalem. Although wisdom lit. in the ancient Near E antedates Proverbs by more than a thousand years, the particular form of instructions addressed to "my son" seems more like the Egypt. works The Instructions of Ptahhotep, The Instructions of Meri-ka-Re, The Instructions of Amen-en-het, and The Instructions of Ani. The marriage of Solomon to Pharaoh's daughter may have led to his interest in such instruction. Individual literary features such as the מָשָׁל֒, H5442, the X, X + 1 pattern, and the long, connected discourses, have parallels in earlier Sem. lit. The work appealed to readers already familiar with that literary form. II. Unity Since the book itself indicates that it is a collection, its unity is not bound up with its authorship. Rather, its unity is found in the general nature of its contents. The work belongs to the general category of wisdom lit.; it extols the virtues of wisdom and condemns the vices of folly. III. Authorship Traditionally, the bulk of Proverbs has been attributed to Solomon (cf. 1:1; 10:1; 25:1). The book itself mentions two other authors: Agur (30:1) and Lemuel (31:1). There are two extreme positions: (1) Solomon wrote the entire work, or (2) he had no connection with it (except as the traditional "patron saint" of wisdom lit.). A third viewpoint, more in keeping with the Biblical testimony, is that Solomon wrote most of the book, and the work of others was added to his. Paterson's statement, "Proverbs have no father" (Wisdom of Israel, p. 62) is only a partial truth. Whereas wisdom sayings often originate among ordinary folk, some one person must have been the first one to utter the epigrammatic statement. One objection to Solomonic authorship has been that Solomon did not practice the virtues Proverbs inculcated (cf. Prov 7:6-23). The same objection, however, could be used against Franklin's authorship of Poor Richard's Almanac. Writing wisdom and living wisely are two different things. The account of Solomon in 1 Kings 3; 4; and 10; esp. 4:30-34; and 2 Chronicles 9:1-24 indicates his traditional wisdom and versatility in composing wisdom sayings. Hence the assertion that the superscriptions (1:1; 10:1; 25:1) are merely honorific fails to do justice to Solomon. Also, one would expect to find the equivalent of "the men of Hezekiah" (25:1) at 1:1 and 10:1. Sheldon Blank's argument that the doublets within a section or in two sections rule out a single authorship overlooks the fact that authors repeated themselves and editors of collections retained duplicate passages (cf. Ps 14:1 with Ps 53:1). The question of the authorship of 22:17-24:34 is bound up with the problem of the section's relationship to The Wisdom of Amenemope, which is discussed below. In the 1st cent. a.d. Jewish controversy over the canon, Proverbs was classed with Ecclesiastes and Song of Solomon as "Solomonic," according to Shabbat 30b. The book as it now exists must come after the time of Hezekiah (25:1). Fritsch (IB, IV, p. 775) thinks the final form may be later than 400 b.c. Others assert that the final collection was assembled sometime between the days of Hezekiah and the early postexilic period. IV. Date Two distinct questions are involved in the dating of Proverbs. The first concerns the date of the writing of each section. The second deals with the date of the collection or "editing" of the various sections into one book (scroll). Conservative scholars have followed the traditional view of Solomonic authorship of all except chs. 30, 31. Therefore they date the bulk of the book in the 10th cent. b.c., prob. from Solomon's later years. The collection of the various sections usually is dated by conservatives between 700 b.c. and 400 b.c. (e.g., Hubbard, NBD, p. 1050, dates the collection in the 5th cent.). Commentary By Dr. J. Vernon McGee © Thru the Bible Radio Network, www.ttb.org.- published: 06 Sep 2013
- views: 0
5:43
Dev Rocka - Observers ft. Charon Don and Killah Priest
Off of The Night Shift....
published: 28 Oct 2008
author: Hiero Pharoah
Dev Rocka - Observers ft. Charon Don and Killah Priest
Dev Rocka - Observers ft. Charon Don and Killah Priest
Off of The Night Shift.- published: 28 Oct 2008
- views: 2886
- author: Hiero Pharoah
54:10
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 3 & 4
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 3 & 4
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is ...
published: 09 Aug 2013
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 3 & 4
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 3 & 4
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 3 & 4 Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that the background of Proverbs seems to be the royal court at Jerusalem. Although wisdom lit. in the ancient Near E antedates Proverbs by more than a thousand years, the particular form of instructions addressed to "my son" seems more like the Egypt. works The Instructions of Ptahhotep, The Instructions of Meri-ka-Re, The Instructions of Amen-en-het, and The Instructions of Ani. The marriage of Solomon to Pharaoh's daughter may have led to his interest in such instruction. Individual literary features such as the מָשָׁל֒, H5442, the X, X + 1 pattern, and the long, connected discourses, have parallels in earlier Sem. lit. The work appealed to readers already familiar with that literary form. II. Unity Since the book itself indicates that it is a collection, its unity is not bound up with its authorship. Rather, its unity is found in the general nature of its contents. The work belongs to the general category of wisdom lit.; it extols the virtues of wisdom and condemns the vices of folly. III. Authorship Traditionally, the bulk of Proverbs has been attributed to Solomon (cf. 1:1; 10:1; 25:1). The book itself mentions two other authors: Agur (30:1) and Lemuel (31:1). There are two extreme positions: (1) Solomon wrote the entire work, or (2) he had no connection with it (except as the traditional "patron saint" of wisdom lit.). A third viewpoint, more in keeping with the Biblical testimony, is that Solomon wrote most of the book, and the work of others was added to his. Paterson's statement, "Proverbs have no father" (Wisdom of Israel, p. 62) is only a partial truth. Whereas wisdom sayings often originate among ordinary folk, some one person must have been the first one to utter the epigrammatic statement. One objection to Solomonic authorship has been that Solomon did not practice the virtues Proverbs inculcated (cf. Prov 7:6-23). The same objection, however, could be used against Franklin's authorship of Poor Richard's Almanac. Writing wisdom and living wisely are two different things. The account of Solomon in 1 Kings 3; 4; and 10; esp. 4:30-34; and 2 Chronicles 9:1-24 indicates his traditional wisdom and versatility in composing wisdom sayings. Hence the assertion that the superscriptions (1:1; 10:1; 25:1) are merely honorific fails to do justice to Solomon. Also, one would expect to find the equivalent of "the men of Hezekiah" (25:1) at 1:1 and 10:1. Sheldon Blank's argument that the doublets within a section or in two sections rule out a single authorship overlooks the fact that authors repeated themselves and editors of collections retained duplicate passages (cf. Ps 14:1 with Ps 53:1). The question of the authorship of 22:17-24:34 is bound up with the problem of the section's relationship to The Wisdom of Amenemope, which is discussed below. In the 1st cent. a.d. Jewish controversy over the canon, Proverbs was classed with Ecclesiastes and Song of Solomon as "Solomonic," according to Shabbat 30b. The book as it now exists must come after the time of Hezekiah (25:1). Fritsch (IB, IV, p. 775) thinks the final form may be later than 400 b.c. Others assert that the final collection was assembled sometime between the days of Hezekiah and the early postexilic period. IV. Date Two distinct questions are involved in the dating of Proverbs. The first concerns the date of the writing of each section. The second deals with the date of the collection or "editing" of the various sections into one book (scroll). Conservative scholars have followed the traditional view of Solomonic authorship of all except chs. 30, 31. Therefore they date the bulk of the book in the 10th cent. b.c., prob. from Solomon's later years. The collection of the various sections usually is dated by conservatives between 700 b.c. and 400 b.c. (e.g., Hubbard, NBD, p. 1050, dates the collection in the 5th cent.). Commentary By Dr. J. Vernon McGee © Thru the Bible Radio Network, www.ttb.org.- published: 09 Aug 2013
- views: 0
4:50
Sam's Kemetic History Video
Video narrative through Kemetic History for the Baiki Mutana & Mutana Music! Living Color,...
published: 20 Jun 2007
author: Sam Livingston
Sam's Kemetic History Video
Sam's Kemetic History Video
Video narrative through Kemetic History for the Baiki Mutana & Mutana Music! Living Color, "History," Pharaoh Sanders' "Astral Travelling," DPZ, "Hip Hop (It...- published: 20 Jun 2007
- views: 1007
- author: Sam Livingston
61:40
Proverbs 16, 17 & 18
Proverbs 16, 17 & 18
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted,...
published: 07 Sep 2013
Proverbs 16, 17 & 18
Proverbs 16, 17 & 18
Proverbs 16, 17 & 18 Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that the background of Proverbs seems to be the royal court at Jerusalem. Although wisdom lit. in the ancient Near E antedates Proverbs by more than a thousand years, the particular form of instructions addressed to "my son" seems more like the Egypt. works The Instructions of Ptahhotep, The Instructions of Meri-ka-Re, The Instructions of Amen-en-het, and The Instructions of Ani. The marriage of Solomon to Pharaoh's daughter may have led to his interest in such instruction. Individual literary features such as the מָשָׁל֒, H5442, the X, X + 1 pattern, and the long, connected discourses, have parallels in earlier Sem. lit. The work appealed to readers already familiar with that literary form. II. Unity Since the book itself indicates that it is a collection, its unity is not bound up with its authorship. Rather, its unity is found in the general nature of its contents. The work belongs to the general category of wisdom lit.; it extols the virtues of wisdom and condemns the vices of folly. III. Authorship Traditionally, the bulk of Proverbs has been attributed to Solomon (cf. 1:1; 10:1; 25:1). The book itself mentions two other authors: Agur (30:1) and Lemuel (31:1). There are two extreme positions: (1) Solomon wrote the entire work, or (2) he had no connection with it (except as the traditional "patron saint" of wisdom lit.). A third viewpoint, more in keeping with the Biblical testimony, is that Solomon wrote most of the book, and the work of others was added to his. Paterson's statement, "Proverbs have no father" (Wisdom of Israel, p. 62) is only a partial truth. Whereas wisdom sayings often originate among ordinary folk, some one person must have been the first one to utter the epigrammatic statement. One objection to Solomonic authorship has been that Solomon did not practice the virtues Proverbs inculcated (cf. Prov 7:6-23). The same objection, however, could be used against Franklin's authorship of Poor Richard's Almanac. Writing wisdom and living wisely are two different things. The account of Solomon in 1 Kings 3; 4; and 10; esp. 4:30-34; and 2 Chronicles 9:1-24 indicates his traditional wisdom and versatility in composing wisdom sayings. Hence the assertion that the superscriptions (1:1; 10:1; 25:1) are merely honorific fails to do justice to Solomon. Also, one would expect to find the equivalent of "the men of Hezekiah" (25:1) at 1:1 and 10:1. Sheldon Blank's argument that the doublets within a section or in two sections rule out a single authorship overlooks the fact that authors repeated themselves and editors of collections retained duplicate passages (cf. Ps 14:1 with Ps 53:1). The question of the authorship of 22:17-24:34 is bound up with the problem of the section's relationship to The Wisdom of Amenemope, which is discussed below. In the 1st cent. a.d. Jewish controversy over the canon, Proverbs was classed with Ecclesiastes and Song of Solomon as "Solomonic," according to Shabbat 30b. The book as it now exists must come after the time of Hezekiah (25:1). Fritsch (IB, IV, p. 775) thinks the final form may be later than 400 b.c. Others assert that the final collection was assembled sometime between the days of Hezekiah and the early postexilic period. IV. Date Two distinct questions are involved in the dating of Proverbs. The first concerns the date of the writing of each section. The second deals with the date of the collection or "editing" of the various sections into one book (scroll). Conservative scholars have followed the traditional view of Solomonic authorship of all except chs. 30, 31. Therefore they date the bulk of the book in the 10th cent. b.c., prob. from Solomon's later years. The collection of the various sections usually is dated by conservatives between 700 b.c. and 400 b.c. (e.g., Hubbard, NBD, p. 1050, dates the collection in the 5th cent.). Commentary By Dr. J. Vernon McGee © Thru the Bible Radio Network, www.ttb.org.- published: 07 Sep 2013
- views: 0
20:50
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 2
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that th...
published: 08 Aug 2013
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 2
Vanity Vanity: Proverbs 2
Vanity of Vanities: Whether or not Solomonic authorship is accepted, one can agree that the background of Proverbs seems to be the royal court at Jerusalem. Although wisdom lit. in the ancient Near E antedates Proverbs by more than a thousand years, the particular form of instructions addressed to "my son" seems more like the Egypt. works The Instructions of Ptahhotep, The Instructions of Meri-ka-Re, The Instructions of Amen-en-het, and The Instructions of Ani. The marriage of Solomon to Pharaoh's daughter may have led to his interest in such instruction. Individual literary features such as the מָשָׁל֒, H5442, the X, X + 1 pattern, and the long, connected discourses, have parallels in earlier Sem. lit. The work appealed to readers already familiar with that literary form. II. Unity Since the book itself indicates that it is a collection, its unity is not bound up with its authorship. Rather, its unity is found in the general nature of its contents. The work belongs to the general category of wisdom lit.; it extols the virtues of wisdom and condemns the vices of folly. III. Authorship Traditionally, the bulk of Proverbs has been attributed to Solomon (cf. 1:1; 10:1; 25:1). The book itself mentions two other authors: Agur (30:1) and Lemuel (31:1). There are two extreme positions: (1) Solomon wrote the entire work, or (2) he had no connection with it (except as the traditional "patron saint" of wisdom lit.). A third viewpoint, more in keeping with the Biblical testimony, is that Solomon wrote most of the book, and the work of others was added to his. Paterson's statement, "Proverbs have no father" (Wisdom of Israel, p. 62) is only a partial truth. Whereas wisdom sayings often originate among ordinary folk, some one person must have been the first one to utter the epigrammatic statement. One objection to Solomonic authorship has been that Solomon did not practice the virtues Proverbs inculcated (cf. Prov 7:6-23). The same objection, however, could be used against Franklin's authorship of Poor Richard's Almanac. Writing wisdom and living wisely are two different things. The account of Solomon in 1 Kings 3; 4; and 10; esp. 4:30-34; and 2 Chronicles 9:1-24 indicates his traditional wisdom and versatility in composing wisdom sayings. Hence the assertion that the superscriptions (1:1; 10:1; 25:1) are merely honorific fails to do justice to Solomon. Also, one would expect to find the equivalent of "the men of Hezekiah" (25:1) at 1:1 and 10:1. Sheldon Blank's argument that the doublets within a section or in two sections rule out a single authorship overlooks the fact that authors repeated themselves and editors of collections retained duplicate passages (cf. Ps 14:1 with Ps 53:1). The question of the authorship of 22:17-24:34 is bound up with the problem of the section's relationship to The Wisdom of Amenemope, which is discussed below. In the 1st cent. a.d. Jewish controversy over the canon, Proverbs was classed with Ecclesiastes and Song of Solomon as "Solomonic," according to Shabbat 30b. The book as it now exists must come after the time of Hezekiah (25:1). Fritsch (IB, IV, p. 775) thinks the final form may be later than 400 b.c. Others assert that the final collection was assembled sometime between the days of Hezekiah and the early postexilic period. IV. Date Two distinct questions are involved in the dating of Proverbs. The first concerns the date of the writing of each section. The second deals with the date of the collection or "editing" of the various sections into one book (scroll). Conservative scholars have followed the traditional view of Solomonic authorship of all except chs. 30, 31. Therefore they date the bulk of the book in the 10th cent. b.c., prob. from Solomon's later years. The collection of the various sections usually is dated by conservatives between 700 b.c. and 400 b.c. (e.g., Hubbard, NBD, p. 1050, dates the collection in the 5th cent.). Commentary By Dr. J. Vernon McGee © Thru the Bible Radio Network, www.ttb.org.- published: 08 Aug 2013
- views: 0
5:19
EGYPT 304 - EGYPTIAN EYES *Close Up II* - (by Egyptahotep)
EGYPTIAN EYES : CLOSE UP II :
I selected several close-ups of different sculptures, mortua...
published: 21 Nov 2013
EGYPT 304 - EGYPTIAN EYES *Close Up II* - (by Egyptahotep)
EGYPT 304 - EGYPTIAN EYES *Close Up II* - (by Egyptahotep)
EGYPTIAN EYES : CLOSE UP II : I selected several close-ups of different sculptures, mortuary masks and coffins of different periods and different materials of ancient Egypt,because it is really fascinating the style and quality of these Artworks,but mainly for the FASCINATING BEAUTY of MAKEUP STYLE used by ancient Egyptians on their eyes.*men & women* (and represented in their artworks).The ancient Egyptians believed that painting their eyes they deflected any negativity brought about by the evil eye.Usually they used 2 colors :black and green. The green was made from malachite (green ore of copper) *Udju*, and the black one (dark Grey) *mesdemet*, (today in the form of kohl).was made from galena (with high lead content). To coloring and shape eyebrows, burnt almonds were combined with minerals, which developed into a substance that could also be worn as eyeshadow. (more details in my video about Makeup) chemical and physical characteristics : GALENA (or Galenite):Color Grey/Black, with metallic luster, Specific Weight From 7,2 to 7,6 Toughness From 2.1/2 to 3, tenacity soft. Formula PbS crystalline form: cubic or octahedral system, or both. Associated usually with pyrite and chalcopyrite, and silver sulphates, Usually was Gotten in Wadi hammamat,(watch my video of this thematic) MALACHITE: color :green emerald. vitreous gloss or matte. specific weight 4, toughness : 4 Tenacity: fragile Formula Cu2[(OH) 2 / CO3] crystalline form: monocyclic system, circular clusters, aggregates radially, often associated with azurite Cu3[OH/CO3]2 usually was gotten in sinai peninsula. in this video you can see two images of Horus & Re Eyes (Udyat) images, then some art examples,paintings as Nut goddess in tut's Tomb, and some mortuary masks,also images of Nefertari,Ankesenamem, meritaten,auibre hor,Amenemope,yuya,Etc, Also, Images of Both Minerals.Even Powder of both how were used, (with other bider components) finally some flasks used- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 74
Youtube results:
7:37
The Maxims of Ptah-Hotep (11-21)
Ptah-Hotep was 110 years old when he decided the time hand come to hand down his experienc...
published: 02 Apr 2013
author: Brother J
The Maxims of Ptah-Hotep (11-21)
The Maxims of Ptah-Hotep (11-21)
Ptah-Hotep was 110 years old when he decided the time hand come to hand down his experience in this form. He wrote what is by convention called "wisdom" but ...- published: 02 Apr 2013
- views: 374
- author: Brother J
0:54
Queen Nefertiti
Arguably, to those who are not very involved in the study of ancient Egypt, Queen Nefertit...
published: 02 Jan 2011
author: LanguageOfEgypt
Queen Nefertiti
Queen Nefertiti
Arguably, to those who are not very involved in the study of ancient Egypt, Queen Nefertiti is perhaps better known than her husband, the heretic king Akhena...- published: 02 Jan 2011
- views: 1484
- author: LanguageOfEgypt
7:58
THE NEW WORLD ORDER:Christopher Green hits a bullseye
please remember to support green wave TV Mr.Green is a profound personality of our times. ...
published: 09 Dec 2011
author: RocketRadioShow
THE NEW WORLD ORDER:Christopher Green hits a bullseye
THE NEW WORLD ORDER:Christopher Green hits a bullseye
please remember to support green wave TV Mr.Green is a profound personality of our times. BRILLIANT oration deluxe. listen and learn. The Georgia Guidestones...- published: 09 Dec 2011
- views: 1900
- author: RocketRadioShow
14:41
Rocket Radio show:Grand finale rapidfire tribute!
ADULTS ONLY! adult restriction. no one under 18 years old or weak-minded allowed http://yo...
published: 01 Dec 2011
author: RocketRadioShow
Rocket Radio show:Grand finale rapidfire tribute!
Rocket Radio show:Grand finale rapidfire tribute!
ADULTS ONLY! adult restriction. no one under 18 years old or weak-minded allowed http://youtu.be/fB0jtFqGytE IF YOU DON'T PRESS LIKE, THEN YOUR GAY good bye ...- published: 01 Dec 2011
- views: 2969
- author: RocketRadioShow