1 – 9 of 9
Anonymous Binh said...

This business about capitalism's collapse reminds me of the 1938 Trotsky's Transitional Program and later Cliff's "reformism without reforms" mantra in the 90s.

That said, I think the crisis is a good opportunity to pull the left together and it seems like this is what this initiative is all about. You folks are ahead of the socialist left in the U.S. on that.

The question I have after reading this is: what's the plan of action?

Is it possible to organize a national day where a lot of people (and unions and other left institutions, NGOs, etc.) withdraw their money and put it into community banks/credit unions? This may not sound terribly radical but it can be. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWGEQ5QTYhk
http://www.observer.com/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-run-on-citibank-ends-in-arrests/

An organized bank run might scare the government into backing down. At the very least it might protect people's savings from the government.

21 January 2012 at 18:52

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This bank scare thing has got to be one of the silliest bloody things I have ever read.

When I stop to think, it actually pisses me off.

Because it makes the left look nutty.

22 January 2012 at 21:36

Anonymous Daphne Lawless said...

A contribution which describes the argument of an article as "silly" and "nutty" without giving any reasons why is simply not worth engaging with. It suggests that the author is coming from a position of sheer prejudice that these things CAN'T HAPPEN, a position not amenable to argument.

Not that I am 100% convinced by the article but it certainly deserves debate, rather than being blindly championed on one side and simply ignored by the other.

23 January 2012 at 16:54

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's a comment from a different anonymous poster than the one above...

When I saw the title of this article, "Will your savings be frozen?", my immediate response was, "who cares?".

In this debt-driven economy, who the hell has savings anyway?

Judging by the title, this article seems to be targeted at the concerns of a few elderly white people.

Does this reflect some new theory about the agent of revolutionary change, or just the demographics of UNITYblog contributors?

23 January 2012 at 20:41

Anonymous Binh said...

Anon 1: check the link I posted. It's not "nutty" to collectively remove money from a bank that could be put under state control with no ability to withdraw your funds into a community bank. It's common sense.

Anon 2: Almost all workers have some money in a bank account, usually checking accounts. The article here isn't referring exclusively to savings accounts or the elderly's nesteggs.

24 January 2012 at 19:55

Anonymous Anonymous said...

A huge proportion of workers, very likely the majority, actually live from payday to payday. They may get a direct credit paycheck into an account; that goes straight to power, gas and rent/mortgage. Whenever there's a strike of any length, crunch day is after the first week. Most workers are then strapped for cash.

As far as the main article goes - if society gets to the state where petty check accounts are frozen by the state , Socialist Worker will not be required to provide collapse education. The streets will be turbulent with enraged citizens, passing and enacting their own open bank resolution.

26 January 2012 at 15:24

Anonymous Anonymous said...

the New Zealand state is preparing to freeze our bank deposits - are you guys for real?

I spose you think the twin towers was an inside job too

2 February 2012 at 13:21

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its working title is Forum on Capitalist Collapse, although that name may change as other leftists express their opinions.

What about

"Forum Undermining Capitalist Kingdoms Engendering Dictatorship"

2 February 2012 at 16:27

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Grant writes: "English says the “option” of freezing bank deposits has been “available to the Reserve Bank for a number of years”. But this “truth” hides a bigger lie. Up till now, the Reserve Bank has lacked the technical means to put this option into operation.

That technical blockage is, however, being rapidly overcome by the installation of networked computer systems."

Since when did a very minor technological advance ever precipitate a sudden total anarchic upheaval of society as we know it?

The poster posting before was right. Nutty my friends,nutty, nutty nutty.

5 February 2012 at 18:51

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot