The Observer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Observer
TheObserver.png
Type Weekly newspaper
Format Berliner (ex-Broadsheet)
Owner(s) Guardian Media Group
Editor John Mulholland
Founded 1791 (1791)
Political alignment Centre-left[1]
Language English
Headquarters Kings Place, 90 York Way, London
Circulation 214,644 (March 2014)[2]
Sister newspapers The Guardian,
The Guardian Weekly
ISSN 0029-7712
OCLC number 50230244
Official website observer.theguardian.com
The Observer (International Edition)
ISSN 9976-1971
OCLC number 436604553

The Observer is a British newspaper, published on Sundays. In the same place on the political spectrum as its daily sister paper The Guardian, whose parent company Guardian Media Group acquired it in 1993, it takes a social liberal or social democratic line on most issues. First published in 1791, it is the world's oldest Sunday newspaper.[3]

History[edit]

Origins[edit]

The first issue, published on 4 December 1791 by W.S. Bourne, was the world's first Sunday newspaper. Believing that the paper would be a means of wealth, Bourne instead soon found himself facing debts of nearly £1,600. Though early editions purported editorial independence, Bourne attempted to cut his losses and sell the title to the government. When this failed, Bourne's brother (a wealthy businessman) made an offer to the government, which also refused to buy the paper but agreed to subsidise it in return for influence over its editorial content. As a result, the paper soon took a strong line against radicals such as Thomas Paine, Francis Burdett and Joseph Priestley.

19th century[edit]

In 1807, the brothers decided to relinquish editorial control, naming Lewis Doxat as the new editor. Seven years later, the brothers sold The Observer to William Innell Clement, a newspaper proprietor who owned a number of publications. The paper continued to receive government subsidies during this period; in 1819, of the approximately 23,000 copies of the paper distributed weekly, approximately 10,000 were given away as "specimen copies", distributed by postmen who were paid to deliver them to "lawyers, doctors, and gentlemen of the town."[4] Yet the paper began to demonstrate a more independent editorial stance, criticising the authorities' handling of the events surrounding the Peterloo Massacre and defying an 1820 court order against publishing details of the trial of the Cato Street Conspirators, who were alleged to have plotted to murder members of the Cabinet. The woodcut pictures published of the stable and hayloft where the conspirators were arrested reflected a new stage of illustrated journalism that the newspaper pioneered during this time.

Clement maintained ownership of The Observer until his death in 1852. During that time, the paper supported parliamentary reform, but opposed a broader franchise and the Chartist leadership. After Doxat retired in 1857, Clement's heirs sold the paper to Joseph Snowe, who also took over the editor's chair. Under Snowe, the paper adopted a more liberal political stance, supporting the North during the American Civil War and endorsing universal manhood suffrage in 1866.[5] These positions contributed to a decline in circulation during this time.

In 1870, wealthy businessman Julius Beer bought the paper and appointed Edward Dicey as editor, whose efforts succeeded in reviving circulation. Though Beer's son Frederick became the owner upon Julius's death in 1880, he had little interest in the newspaper and was content to leave Dicey as editor until 1889. Henry Duff Traill took over the editorship after Dicey's departure, only to be replaced in 1891 by Frederick's wife, Rachel Beer, of the Sassoon family. Though circulation declined during her tenure, she remained as editor for thirteen years, combining it in 1893 with the editorship of The Sunday Times, a newspaper that she had also bought.[6]

20th century[edit]

Upon Frederick's death in 1905, the paper was purchased by the newspaper magnate Lord Northcliffe. After maintaining the existing editorial leadership for a couple of years, in 1908 Northcliffe named James Louis Garvin as editor. Garvin quickly turned the paper into an organ of political influence, boosting circulation from 5,000 to 40,000 within a year of his arrival as a result. Yet the revival in the paper's fortunes masked growing political disagreements between Garvin and Northcliffe. These disagreements ultimately led Northcliffe to sell the paper to William Waldorf Astor in 1911, who transferred ownership to his son Waldorf four years later.

During this period, the Astors were content to leave the control of the paper in Garvin's hands. Under his editorship circulation reached 200,000 during the interwar years, a figure which Garvin fought to maintain even during the depths of the Great Depression. Politically the paper pursued an independent Tory stance, which eventually brought Garvin into conflict with Waldorf's more liberal son, David. Their conflict contributed to Garvin's departure as editor in 1942, after which the paper took the unusual step of declaring itself non-partisan.

Ownership passed to Waldorf's sons in 1948, with David taking over as editor. He remained in the position for 27 years, during which time he turned it into a trust-owned newspaper employing, among others, George Orwell, Paul Jennings and C. A. Lejeune. Under Astor's editorship The Observer became the first national newspaper to oppose the government's 1956 invasion of Suez, a move which cost it many readers. In 1977, the Astors sold the ailing newspaper to US oil giant Atlantic Richfield (now called ARCO) who sold it to Lonrho plc in 1981. Since June 1993, it has been part of the Guardian Media Group.

In 1990, Farzad Bazoft, a journalist for The Observer, was executed in Iraq on charges of spying. In 2003, The Observer interviewed the Iraqi colonel who had arrested and interrogated Bazoft and who was convinced that Bazoft was not a spy.[7]

21st century[edit]

On 27 February 2005, The Observer Blog[8] was launched, making The Observer the first newspaper to purposely document its own internal decisions, as well as the first newspaper to release podcasts. The paper's regular columnists include Andrew Rawnsley and Nick Cohen.

In addition to the weekly Observer Magazine which is still present every Sunday, for several years each issue of The Observer came with a different free monthly magazine. These magazines had the titles Observer Sport Monthly, Observer Music Monthly, Observer Woman and Observer Food Monthly.

Content from The Observer is included in The Guardian Weekly for an international readership.

The Observer followed its daily partner The Guardian and converted to 'Berliner' format on Sunday 8 January 2006.[9][10]

The Observer was announced as National Newspaper of the Year at the British Press Awards 2007.[citation needed]

Whitehall Editor Jo Revill had, as Health Editor, been named Medical Journalist of the Year in 2000 and 2006 by two different organisations, when she was Health Editor.[citation needed]

On 24 October 2007, it was announced that editor Roger Alton was stepping down at the end of the year to be replaced by his deputy, John Mulholland.[11]

In early 2010, the paper was rejuvenated. An article on the paper's website previewing the new version stated that "The News section, which will incorporate Business and personal finance, will be home to a new section, Seven Days, offering a complete round-up of the previous week's main news from Britain and around the world, and will also focus on more analysis and comment."[12]

Supplements and features[edit]

After the paper was rejuvenated in early 2010, the main paper came with only a small number of supplements – Sport, The Observer Magazine, The New Review and The New York Times International Weekly, an 8-page supplement of articles selected from The New York Times, has been distributed with the paper since 2007. Every four weeks the paper includes The Observer Food Monthly magazine.

Previously, the main paper had come with a vast range of supplements including Sport, Business & Media, Review, Escape (a travel supplement), The Observer Magazine and various special interest monthlies, such as Observer Food Monthly, Observer Women monthly which was launched in 2006,[13] Observer Sport Monthly and The Observer Film Magazine.

The Newsroom[edit]

The Observer and its sister newspaper The Guardian operate a visitor centre in London called The Newsroom. It contains their archives, including bound copies of old editions, a photographic library and other items such as diaries, letters and notebooks. This material may be consulted by members of the public. The Newsroom also mounts temporary exhibitions and runs an educational program for schools.

In November 2007, The Observer and The Guardian made their archives available over the internet.[14] The current extent of the archives available are 1791 to 2000 for The Observer and 1821 to 2000 for The Guardian. These archives will eventually go up to 2003.

Bans[edit]

The paper was banned in Egypt in February 2008 due to the publication of Prophet Mohammad's cartoons.[15]

Editors[edit]

Awards[edit]

The Observer was named the British Press Awards National Newspaper of the Year in 2007.[16] Its supplements have twice won "Regular Supplement of the Year" (Sport Monthly, 2001; Food Monthly, 2006).[16]

Observer journalists have won a range of British Press Awards, including[16]

Madsen controversy[edit]

On 30 June 2013, The Observer published a major front page story sourced from Wayne Madsen, alleging connections between the National Security Agency and several European governments known as ECHELON.[17][18] In the story, entitled “Revealed: Secret European Deal to Hand Over Private Data to Americans,” Madsen claimed that several European governments were “colluding with the U.S. over the mass harvesting of personal communications data.” [19]

According to Michael Moynihan of the Daily Beast, shortly after going to press, The Observer realised that the story’s author, Jamie Doward, had failed to conduct even the most perfunctory Google search on Madsen.[20] The article was quickly removed from the parent (Guardian) newspaper's website pending an investigation, but not before the print edition had gone to press.[17][19] Several journalists reporting on the incident described Madsen as a "conspiracy theorist."[19][21][22][23] According to Forbes magazine, The Observer took the story down probably because it was concerned with the reliability of the source rather than the content as, no matter how "left field" the source was, the story seems to be largely true and has been a matter of public record for some years.[24]

Joshua Gillin of the Poynter Institute noted that The Observer had not interviewed Madsen but had pulled the quotes from an online interview with Madsen and that Madsen's "declassified documents", upon which the story was based, were publicly available on the NSA website.[21]

Bibliography[edit]

  • Richard Cockett, David Astor and The Observer, André Deutsch, London, 1990, 294 pp. with index. ISBN 0-233-98735-5. Has endpapers which are facsimiles of The Observer, with other black-and-white photographic plates of personnel linked to the newspaper.

See also[edit]


References[edit]

  1. ^ Matt Wells (15 October 2004). "World writes to undecided voters". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved 13 July 2008. 
  2. ^ "The Observer - readership data". News Works. Retrieved 12 April 2014. 
  3. ^ "The Observer under review". BBC News. 4 August 2009. Retrieved 27 March 2010. 
  4. ^ Dennis Griffiths (ed.) The Encyclopedia of the British Press, 1422–1992, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992, p.159
  5. ^ Observer text timeline
  6. ^ A brief history of The Observer
  7. ^ Iraqi colonel admits Bazoft not a spy, accessed 4 April 2007
  8. ^ Observer blog, accessed 27 February 2007
  9. ^ Observer announces relaunch date, accessed 27 February 2007
  10. ^ The archive – summary of holdings, accessed 27 February 2007
  11. ^ Stephen Brook (3 January 2008). "Mulholland reshapes Observer team". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved 17 February 2008. 
  12. ^ Guardian.co.uk
  13. ^ "New editor at the FINANCIAL TIMES". Press Business (1). February 2006. Retrieved 7 October 2013. 
  14. ^ DigitalArchive
  15. ^ "Der Spiegel issue on Islam banned in Egypt". France24. 2 April 2008. Retrieved 29 September 2013. 
  16. ^ a b c Press Gazette, Roll of Honour[dead link], accessed 24 July 2011
  17. ^ a b Paul Szoldea "The Guardian Revealed A Major NSA 'Scoop' Then Deleted It From Their Website", San Francisco Chronicle, 30 June 2013, reprint from "Business Insider", 29 June 2013.
  18. ^ Telegraph
  19. ^ a b c http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/01/guardian-pulls-front-page-nsa-story-after-source-revealed-to-be-conspiracy-nut/#ixzz2YB7DXhbB Daily Caller
  20. ^ "http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/01/nsa-nutjob-anatomy-of-a-fake-observer-story.html
  21. ^ a b Gillin, Joshua (2013-06-29). "Observer pulls story about NSA deal based on Wayne Madsen conspiracy theory". Poynter. Retrieved 4 July 2013. 
  22. ^ TPM
  23. ^ Raheem Kassam, Executive Editor (30 June 2013). "Freedoms, fiefdoms, and f**k-ups". The Commentator. Retrieved 4 July 2013. 
  24. ^ http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/06/30/the-absolute-joy-of-the-guardians-sting-over-prism-and-the-nsa/ The Absolute Joy Of The Guardian's Sting Over PRISM And The NSA Forbes 30 June 2013

External links[edit]