J

J

@piercepenniless

anarchist, theorist, queer, utopian, angry. See also:

London · piercepenniless.wordpress.com

推文

  1. Not to mention the bizarre conflation of writers' right to payment with their right to profit from MECW. Rentiers gonna seek rent.

  2. Singing the virtues of the "public" academic library makes it look like L&W have had their heads firmly buried for the past few years.

  3. We've all dated those people / people who become those people. It makes one feel better about life choices, certainly.

  4. 轉推
  5. 轉推

    oh so apparently the copyright is actually owned by the long defunct Progress Publishers, Moscow. I hope are aware of this...

  6. I don't think they did historically? Communist Party did. Possibly post-USSR they bore some of it. Still barbaric though.

  7. It's just a stupid strategy -- the only possible effect it could have on MECW purchases is negative.

  8. Assiduous copyrighting of dead communists' work, besides being completely barbaric, is also something of a Canute moment. Won't work.

  9. Intellectual rentierism of the worst sort. And pointless - no one is going to buy an MECW because of the takedown. Absurd.

  10. Absolutely inexcusable for Lawrence & Wishart to force Marxist Internet Archive to take down MECW. Parasites!

  11. 轉推

    Gherkin in a nutshell: the loan's in swiss francs, the building is valued in sterling.Swiss franc has gone one way, £ the other

  12. 轉推

    Holy shit! The Gherkin's in receivership! Deloitte appointed. More to follow.

  13. At this moment, I am thankful for NLR's relatively lax pursuit of online copyright violations.

看來要一段時間讀取資料。

Twitter 可能容量超過負荷,或是發生暫時性的小問題。請再試一次,或瀏覽 Twitter 狀態以取得詳細資訊。