Living the Dream – HooHa Podcast Work, Workers And Organizing Part 1

mon1
Bringing the theme of work back on the political agenda. How? With whom? The answer to the last question seems obvious: with the workers themselves. Getting to know them again, these unknowns. Getting them to speak again, these mutes. Bringing the place of work back into the non-places of today’s politics.(Tronti)

 

 

If international developments are any guide, in coming years there will be major social struggles in Australia over these and other issues. Workers would be best served by starting a conversation based around how to secure their collective interests, whether or not they are part of a union. It is a conversation that should not be delayed by the distant hope the existing union movement will solve it by itself.(Humphrys and Tietze 2014)

 

 

This is part one of our investigation into our days at work, experiences of work, the various forms of worker self-activity and the positives and negatives of our experiences with unions. We are talking to Michael who works for Qld Rail. You will hear Renee, Tom, Dave & Rob ( and Arlo in the background).  Hopefully you will be able to subscribe via iTunes soon.

Listen to this episode or Download this episode (right click and save)

#HooHaLTD

 

Humphrys, Elizabeth, and Tad Tietze. 2014. Qantas and Job Losses: The Reality of Union Decline Must Be Faced. theguardian Comment is Free 2014 [cited 22nd March 2014]. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/05/how-relevant-are-australian-unions.

Tronti, Mario. 2012. Politics at Work  [cited 30th December 2012]. Available from http://libcom.org/library/politics-work.

Living the Dream – HOOHA RADIO!

This blog is part of a very amorphous project called the HooHa Group.
One of our new initiatives is Living the Dream - a semi-regular series of podcasts in which we talk about some of the issues and concerns that we are trying to explore as a project.  The intention is that these podcast will be along similar lines to what we are writing about. Its all part of our attempt to create a no bullshit space for radical anticapitalist/emancipatory politics with a Brisbane focus.

You can listen to it directly here http://hoohagroup.podbean.com and as soon as we get the okay from iTunes you will  be able to subscribe through them

But here is a quick intro: Listen to this episode

#hoohaltd

Liz Thompson explains why she is not speaking at the Close Manus rally on Saturday

Originally posted on Operational Matters:

I am not speaking at the Close Manus rally on Saturday, organised by RAC [Refugee Action Collective]. Without thinking, I agreed to do it, thinking there could be no harm. But in fact the reaction to me speaking on Dateline has made me reconsider. 

View original 998 more words

‘Addressing these challenges requires ambition’: The G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

…money only has one face, that of the boss.

                                                                        (Negri, 1991, p. 23)

Over the last few days a number of important meetings of the G20 have been held in Sydney. The main meetings have been the Finance and Central Bank Deputies meeting #2 (20th to 22nd February) and the Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting (22nd to 23 Feb) but there has also been a joint round table between the B20( the Business 20) and G20 on Infrastructure and the launch of an OECD report Going for Growth as well as we can assume countless photo-ops, corridor conversations and long lunches – noticeably Christine Lagarde from the IMF is in town. All this should emphasize to us how the Leaders Forum is only one element in what seems to be a now year round series of events, meetings and discussion that work to constitute the G20 as the permanent and preeminent executive body of global capitalism.

Continue reading

Policing Newman’s Crisis: Law and order, hegemony and the State

Image

The recent passing of Stuart Hall led me to do something I’ve been meaning to do for some time – read one of his many co-authored political interventions: Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. A foundational work in cultural studies, the book looked critically at the phenomenon of ‘mugging’ in Britain during the 1970s, a crisis of authority confected by government and media.

Hall and his co-writers argued that the rise of this new focus on law and order was the result of a significant weakening in the government’s ability to generate consent from its citizenry. Or, as the author’s approvingly quote Gramsci: “the crisis of the ruling class’ hegemony [occurs] because the ruling class has failed in some major political undertaking for which it has requested or forcibly extracted the consent of the broad masses…A ‘crisis of authority’ is spoken of: this is precisely the crisis of hegemony, or the general crisis of the State.”[1]

We have seen something of this across Australia of late. Crises of authority – taking the form of bikies, out of control drinkers and ‘one punch’ attackers and paedophiles – have emerged from all quarters, generated in tangent with a willing media driven as always by their own bottom line more than political expediency.

How are such law and order drives usually read by the Left – if we are to continue with the fiction that such a thing exists? Firstly, law and order drives are read as media sensations of the lowest calibre. The easily led ‘bogans’ (read, working class), entirely depending on the Herald Sun or Courier Mail for their drip-fed opinions, are joined in a chorus of moral outrage. Secondly, they are a distraction, one foisted on the people by a conniving government intent on taking away liberties and rights while citizens backs are turned.

The fantastic thing about Hall’s work is that it looks beyond such shallow readings – highlighting instead the relationship between law and order, political crisis and hegemony. In the remainder of this article I want to sketch out briefly some of the ways that the tools employed in Policing the Crisis can be used to come to a better understanding of what’s going on in Queensland in particular at the moment.

Continue reading

On the IPA, human rights and counter-hegemonies

So, Tony Abbott has appointed Institute of Public Affairs policy analyst Tim Wilson as Australia’s next human rights commissioner. Quelle surprise. The Left in general have gotten in quite a huff over this,[1] despite the fact that the organisation’s previously wall-to-wall leftist commissioners failed to deter the Labor government from its descent to the bottom of the refugee policy barrel.

And sure, Wilson will certainly use the position to push his libertarian agenda, although even Tony Abbott must have seen the irony in appointing an outspoken critic of government intervention in people’s lives (not to mention spending in general) to a plush,$300,000 a year plus taxpayer funded job at a rights lobby.

But in the end, I think there are two key points missing from this debate. The nature of ‘human rights’ as an idea, and the left’s general readiness to jump into the morass of culture wars. Both of which point to a significant misunderstanding of how we should be establishing what Gramsci called a ‘counter-hegemony’ of radical ideas.

Continue reading

You’ve got to be Jo(h)king: History, the Left and Queensland

joh-newman

(This is a guest post from a friend of The Word From Struggle Street Jon)

It was the 40th anniversary of the Athens Polytechnic uprising recently. On the 17th of November 1973, tanks rolled onto campus, and in a bloody orgy of violence unwittingly sealed the demise of the regime of the Colonels. The Polytechnic uprising holds a vital place in Greek radical mythology – hell, there’s a public holiday for it – and it is a constant reference point by the media and the generation of ex-protestors – who now hold power in Greece and have set themselves up as the arbiters of radical memory – whenever another spate of political engagement emerges.

One ex-protestor, Mimis Androulakis, a student leader during the dictatorship period, “has argued that the Polytechnic Generation acts like a group of ‘vampires.’ In his view, through its deification, the Polytechnic Generation absorbs younger generations in its own past, rather than allowing them to develop their own genuine rebellions.”[1]

I want to briefly explore herein whether something similar can be seen to be occurring in Queensland. With the Newman conservative government rising to power, and a movement emerging to counter it which makes explicit and constant references to its ‘glory days’ during the rule of Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen, I want to ask whether a similarly parasitic relationship with the past is emerging, and point to a few ways it might be avoided. In the end, a successful movement needs to engage in a productive dialogue with the past, and with the currently global context of austerity, in order to be successful.

Continue reading