SUBSCRIBE for Latest on IRAQ WAR / WORLD WAR 3 / NEW WORLD ORDER / ELITE AGENDA / GOLD / SILVER / BITCOIN / LITECOIN http://www.youtube.com/AgendaNWO GERALD CELENTE - The Endless IRAQ WAR will get MUCH WORSE Baghdad: Al Qaeda gunmen seeking to form a radical Islamic state out of the chaos of Syria's civil war are fighting hard to reconquer the province they once controlled in neighbouring Iraq, stirring fears the conflict is exporting ever more instability. Exploiting local grievances against Baghdad's rule and buoyed by al Qaeda gains in Syria, the fighters have taken effective control of Anbar's two main cities for the first time since US occupation troops defeated them in 2006-07. Their advance is ringing alarm bells in Washington: The United States has pledged to help Baghdad quell the militant surge in Anbar — although not with troops — to stabilise a province that saw the heaviest fighting of the US occupation. The United States is sending Iraq dozens of missiles and surveillance drones to help it combat a recent surge in Al-Qaeda-backed violence, a report said on Thursday. The weapons include a shipment of 75 Hellfire missiles purchased by Iraq, which Washington delivered to the country last week, the Times reported. The daily wrote that 10 ScanEagle reconnaissance drones — smaller versions of the larger Predator drones that once were frequently flown over Iraq — are expected to be sent by March. As usual, the interventionists who run the US foreign policy establishment are drawing all the wrong conclusions from the news that the former "al-Qaeda in Iraq" (now "al-Qaeda in Iraq and Syria") has set up shop in the notorious Fallujah. Sen. John McCain and his sidekick, Sen. Lindsey Graham, issued a joint statement over the weekend which unsurprisingly blamed the whole development on President Obama's decision to withdraw US forces form Iraq in 2011. Image: U.S. Troops (Wikimedia Commons). Wrote the Senators: When President Obama withdrew all U.S. forces from Iraq in 2011, over the objections of our military leaders and commanders on the ground, many of us predicted that the vacuum would be filled by America's enemies and would emerge as a threat to U.S. national security interests. There are two things wrong with this analysis. First, the phenomenon of al-Qaeda in Iraq was created by the invasion that the two Senators championed. Al-Qaeda was not in Iraq before 2003, as we all know. So if anyone is responsible for al-Qaeda in Iraq it is McCain, Graham, and the coterie of cakewalk neo-conservatives who pushed for the war. Secondly, as the Moon of Alabama blog so deftly points out, the whole "power vacuum" argument is a reality vacuum — making no sense: It was the U.S. attack on Iraq that set off the sectarian war in Iraq and beyond. It was the removal of Saddam Hussein that changed the balance between Saudi Sunnism and Iranian Shiaism which then motivated the Saudis to unleash the Jihadist forces. It was not a 'power vacuum' that created the strife that continues today and will continue in the future. It was the insertion of U.S. forces into the Middle East that led to overpressure and the current explosions. war "world war 3" "world war III" "middle east" iraq "gerald celente" prediction u.s. "united states" usa america return military "u.s. army" trends trending humanity obama "united nations" wars colonial rage east islam religion muslim victory 2014 media news report newspaper future lies lie truth "wake up" general drone "we the people" system crisis warning entertainment invade control power agenda tribal warfare "war games" game united politics conflict religious "civil war" "agenda nwo" weapons of mass destruction bush destabilized trends in the news alex jones infowars david icke farrakhan wearechange McCain and Graham and the neocons want to have it both ways. They want us to believe that the "liberation" of Iraq produced a successful, positive result — a brave new society eager to spread its democratic, tolerant, and multicultural wings. That would justify their decade long (and more) advocacy of such an attack. But at the same time they tell us that the US military can never leave Iraq lest a "power vacuum" be created that would allow "America's enemies" to establish themselves. But was the attack itself not supposed to rid Iraq of "America's enemies"? These new enemies seem far worse than the enemies the initial intervention was supposed to eliminate. How awkward for them to face the fact that their preferred action (invasion) produced a result worse than the problem. Their Straussian answer, of course, is to ignore that glaring fact and just scream for more intervention! Secretary of State John Kerry is sending what are no-doubt designed to be mixed signals, wrapped in the enigma of State Dept-speak. He says:

• published: 29 Jan 2014
• views: 633