SUBSCRIBE for more on FREEDOM / HUMANITY / POPULATION CONTROL / NEW WORLD ORDER / ELITE / BITCOIN / LITECOIN http://www.youtube.com/AgendaNWO BORDERS are Just Another Way to CONTROL the FREEDOM of MOVEMENT & CONTROL the MASSES An open border is a border that enables free movement of people between different jurisdictions with limited or no restrictions to movement. A border may be an open border due to intentional legislation allowing free movement of people across the border or a border may be an open border due to lack of adequate enforcement or adequate supervision of the border which allows the free movement of people across the border combined with inadequate detection and inadequate enforcement within the jurisdiction to ensure people have in fact entered through authorized border controls. An open territorial border allows free movement of people between two different countries or between a group of countries. An example: The open border of this is the opening of international borders between different member states of the European Union which has allowed free movement with very few restrictions. An open civic border allows free movement of people within a country between different states or territories. An example of this is the United States where interstate borders are open with very limited restrictions on movement. The term "open borders" applies only to the flow of people, it does not refer to the flow of goods and services.[1] An equivalent concept to open borders in relation for the free flow of goods and services is free trade. Generally where an open borders policy exist so does a free trade policy but the converse is not necessarily true, there are many examples of a free trade policy which is not accompanied by an open borders policy. Even with the existing realm of limited immigration, the "one world" phenomenon is visible to some extent: friendship and kinship networks have global reach. Thus, information and ideas can travel faster through these networks, and new opportunities are available for businesses that rely on trade between multiple countries. Freer migration promotes more free trade of goods and ideas, and reduces the chances of conflict and war between countries. The one world thesis is laid out in great detail by Economist editor Robert Guest in his book Borderless Economics This libertarian principle says that the right of free mobility is a natural right and cannot legitimately be restricted unless there is a high risk of violating other natural rights. government gang mafia line map "map line" country border control patrol "border patrol" power identity american "american citizen" birth born u.s. "united states" geographic reality good bad people humanity rights 2013 2014 world earth respect citizen "freedom of movement" movement location immigration visa passport map "u.s. visa" greencard expat "british passport" citizenship profit business corporate checkpoint liberty mass population patriot patriotic free illegal immigrant travel holiday vacation "agenda nwo" alex jones infowars gerald celente trends in the news glenn beck wearechange anonymous farrakhan lindsey williams jsnip4 adam kokesh adam vs the man u.s. border patrol property rights Robert Nozick is a (now dead) libertarian philosopher known for the book Anarchy, State and Utopia, where he argues for the existence of a minimal night-watchman state whose only legitimate function is the protection of people's natural rights. In a paper titled Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders, Joseph Carens argues, in a section titled Aliens and Property Rights: individuals already enjoy in the state of nature. Note what this implies for immigration. Suppose a farmer from the United States wanted to hire workers from Mexico. The government would have no right to prohibit him from doing this. To prevent the Mexicans from coming would violate the rights of both the American farmer and the Mexican workers ) Even if the Mexicans did not have job offers from an American, a Nozickean government would have no grounds for preventing them from entering the country. So long as they were peaceful and did not steal, trespass on private property, or otherwise violate the rights of other individuals, their entry and their actions would be none of the state's business This is a libertarian response to some of the anti-open borders arguments that stem from concerns about the harms to immigrant-sending countries such as brain drain and delay of political reform. The claim is that, even if there are some harms to others due to an individual's choice to migrate, these harms are not sufficient to overcome the right to migrate. This is because of the principle of self-ownership: each person is owned by himself/herself, not by the state where he/she happens to be born.

• published: 26 Dec 2013
• views: 74