• pub­lished: 05 Sep 2013
• views: 3440

How To Go To Heav­en: http://​www.​jesus-is-savior.​com/​how_​to_​be_​saved.​html http://​www.​presstv.​ir/​detail/​2013/​09/​05/​322161/​homemade-chemical-ammo-used-in-syria/​ Home­made chem­i­cal am­mu­ni­tion used in March at­tack in Syria: Rus­sia Thu Sep 5, 2013 5:59AM GMT Rus­sia says that home-made am­mu­ni­tion was used in a chem­i­cal at­tack car­ried out in Syria's north­west­ern city of Alep­po in March, which killed over two dozen peo­ple. The Rus­sian For­eign Min­istry said in a state­ment on Wednes­day, "The used round of am­mu­ni­tion was a home­made item on the basis of rock­ets made in Syria's north by the so-called Bashair Al-Nasr brigade." Moscow made the state­ment based on con­clu­sions reached by the Rus­sian ex­perts who car­ried out an in­ves­ti­ga­tion into the March 19 chem­i­cal at­tack, which re­port­ed­ly left 26 Syr­i­an civil­ians and sol­diers dead and near­ly 100 oth­ers af­fect­ed. Ac­cord­ing to the Rus­sian For­eign Min­istry, the chem­i­cal weapons used in the at­tack were not made by the Syr­i­an army. The find­ings by the Rus­sian ex­perts come amid a ris­ing threat of war against Syria over the un­sub­stan­ti­at­ed ac­cu­sa­tion that the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment has used chem­i­cal weapons. The rhetoric of war against Syria first gained mo­men­tum on Au­gust 21, when the mil­i­tants op­er­at­ing in­side the Mid­dle East­ern coun­try and the for­eign-backed Syr­i­an op­po­si­tion claimed that over a thou­sand peo­ple had been killed in a gov­ern­ment chem­i­cal at­tack on mil­i­tant strongholds in the Dam­as­cus sub­urbs of Ain Tarma, Za­mal­ka and Jobar. The Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly re­ject­ed the ac­cu­sa­tion and said the mil­i­tants had con­duct­ed the at­tack to draw in for­eign mil­i­tary in­ter­ven­tion. Nev­er­the­less, a num­ber of West­ern coun­tries, in­clud­ing the Unit­ed States, France, and Britain, quick­ly start­ed cam­paign­ing for war. The talk of war reached a peak on Tues­day, Au­gust 27, when media out­lets re­port­ed US plans for like­ly sur­gi­cal at­tacks. Later, how­ev­er, do­mes­tic and in­ter­na­tion­al calls against a po­ten­tial war forced some of the war­mon­ger­ing coun­tries to tem­porar­i­ly tone down their stances. On Au­gust 29, the British par­lia­ment voted against par­tic­i­pa­tion by Britain, the Unit­ed States' clos­est ally, in any po­ten­tial mil­i­tary in­ter­ven­tion in Syria under the cur­rent cir­cum­stances. On Fri­day, Au­gust 30, NATO also dis­tanced it­self from par­tic­i­pat­ing in any mil­i­tary in­ter­ven­tion in Syria, with the chief of the West­ern mil­i­tary coali­tion, Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al An­ders Fogh Ras­mussen, say­ing he did not "fore­see any NATO role" in a war on Syria. LINK FOR REST http://​rt.​com/​news/​chemical-aleppo-findings-russia-417/​ Rus­sia re­leas­es key find­ings on chem­i­cal at­tack near Alep­po in­di­cat­ing sim­i­lar­i­ty with rebel-made weapons Pub­lished time: Septem­ber 04, 2013. Probes from Khan al-As­sal show chem­i­cals used in the March 19 at­tack did not be­long to stan­dard Syr­i­an army am­mu­ni­tion, and that the shell car­ry­ing the sub­stance was sim­i­lar to those made by a rebel fight­er group, the Rus­sian For­eign Min­istry stat­ed. RT's LIVE UP­DATES on Syr­i­an 'chem­i­cal weapons' cri­sis A state­ment re­leased by the min­istry on Wednes­day par­tic­u­lar­ly drew at­ten­tion to the "mas­sive stove-pip­ing of var­i­ous in­for­ma­tion aimed at plac­ing the re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for the al­leged chem­i­cal weapons use in Syria on Dam­as­cus, even though the re­sults of the UN in­ves­ti­ga­tion have not yet been re­vealed." By such means "the way is being paved for mil­i­tary ac­tion" against Dam­as­cus, the min­istry point­ed out. But the sam­ples taken at the site of the March 19 at­tack and an­a­lyzed by Rus­sian ex­perts in­di­cate that a pro­jec­tile car­ry­ing the dead­ly nerve agent sarin was most like­ly fired at Khan al-As­sal by the rebels, the min­istry state­ment sug­gests, out­lin­ing the 100-page re­port hand­ed over to the UN by Rus­sia. The key points of the re­port have been given as fol­lows: • the shell used in the in­ci­dent "does not be­long to the stan­dard am­mu­ni­tion of the Syr­i­an army and was crude­ly ac­cord­ing to type and pa­ram­e­ters of the rock­et-pro­pelled un­guid­ed mis­siles man­u­fac­tured in the north of Syria by the so-called Bashair al-Nasr brigade"; • RDX, which is also known as hex­o­gen or cy­clonite, was used as the burst­ing charge for the shell, and it is "not used in stan­dard chem­i­cal mu­ni­tions"; • soil and shell sam­ples con­tain "the non-in­dus­tri­al­ly syn­the­sized nerve agent sarin and di­iso­propy­lflu­o­rophos­phate," which was "used by West­ern states for pro­duc­ing chem­i­cal weapons dur­ing World War II." The find­ings of the re­port are "ex­treme­ly spe­cif­ic," as they most­ly con­sist of sci­en­tif­ic and tech­ni­cal data from probes' anal­y­sis, the min­istry stressed, adding that this data can "sub­stan­tial­ly aid" the UN in­ves­ti­ga­tion of the in­ci­dent. While fo­cus­ing on the Khan al-As­sal at­tack on March 19, in which at least 26 civil­ians and Syr­i­an army sol­diers were killed, and 86 more were in­jured, the Rus­sian For­eign Min­istry also crit­i­cized the "flawed se­lec­tive ap­proach" of cer­tain states in re­port­ing the re­cent in­ci­dents of al­leged LINK FOR REST