• Tell us your Obamacare stories

    Karen Bleier / AFP - Getty Images

    A woman looks at the HealthCare.gov insurance exchange internet site showing a "Please wait" page, in this October 1, 2013 file photo in Washington, DC.

    The rollout of Obamacare has been bumpy, to say the least, and many Americans continue to express confusion about their healthcare coverage and what 2014 holds.


    As we look to help readers of NBCNews.com stay informed on the latest news around the rollout of Healthcare.gov and the Affordable Care Act, we’re asking for your help: Have you heard from your personal health insurance company about premiums for next year, and how much they are rising or falling? For those of you who get health insurance via your employer, are your premiums going up or down?


    And how is the plan you are offered changing? For example, is there a difference in what is "in network" and what is "out of network"? Will your deductibles increase or decrease? And are you eligible for a subsidy through Obamacare?

    If you’ve been surprised by the latest news from your insurer or employer, or by how the ACA is affecting your bottom line, NBC News wants to hear from you. Submit your story via email by clicking on this address.

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook 

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

  • Sources: Alleged LAX gunman had 'new world order' conspiracy theory tract

    NBC News

    Paul Anthony Ciancia, 23, is shown in a driver's license photo.

    The man who allegedly killed a TSA worker and wounded three others at Los Angeles International Airport on Friday had anti-government literature in his possession outlining an alleged conspiracy to create a single global government, law enforcement sources tell NBC News.

    The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the material recovered from Paul Anthony Ciancia, 23, after the shootout at LAX appeared to have been prepared by a group called “New World Order.” One source said it also expressed animus toward racial minorities.

    There is no record of a radical group by that name and the term “New World Order” is often used by conspiracy-minded groups and individuals to describe an alleged secret plot to establish an autonomous world government that would replace sovereign nations and put an end to international power struggles.


    On Saturday, Mark Potok, an expert on hate groups with the Southern Poverty Law Center, published additional details on the literature, citing "a knowledgeable source with ranking law enforcement contacts." Potok said the one-page “manifesto” in Ciacia's possession included references to the Federal Reserve and “fiat currency” -- terms borrowed from the antigovernment “Patriot” movement. 

    Very little was known about Cianci, who had lived in the Philadelphia area before moving to California.

    His brother told police in New Jersey he had received a text message from the suspect Friday morning saying he was thinking about taking his life. 


    Pennsville, N.J., Police Chief Allen J. Cummings then contacted the Los Angeles Police Department to do a well-being check on Ciancia at his apartment in California. He wasn’t there when LAPD officers contacted his roommates about 10 a.m. local time, but they said everything was fine.

    Ciancia’s father, also named Paul, told NBC station KNBC that he last spoke to his son a week ago, when the son said the economy was depressed. The senior Ciancia said he didn’t know if his son had a job or if he owned any weapons, but confirmed that he was in California.

    Ciancia was shot by law enforcement and taken into custody after he allegedly began shooting at Transportation Security Administration workers with an assault rifle at about 9:20 a.m. local time.

    Passengers at LAX describe the moments after the shooting started.

    Federal officials said it was unclear whether the gunman was targeting TSA workers or was trying to shoot his way through to gain greater access to the airport. But one witness said the shooter, while walking through the terminal with his weapon, approached him with a one-word question.

    "All he said was, 'TSA?' Just like that," Leon Saryan told MSNBC.

    The shooting started in Terminal 3, which serves Virgin America and other airlines. Ciancia allegedly took a 223-caliber AR-15 style, semiautomatic rifle out of a duffle bag and fired on TSA officers at a screening checkpoint, authorities said.  He then went farther into the terminal, where he exchanged fire with law enforcement and was shot multiple times in the chest, they said.

    He was hospitalized in critical condition, authorities said.

    Police said quick action by airport officers averted a worse tragedy.

    Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said at a news conference later Friday that the gunman had with him at least 100 more rounds of ammunition that “literally would have killed everyone in that terminal.”

    NBC's Ted Greenberg and Nyree Arabian contributed to this report.

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

     

     

  • Leader of Pakistan Taliban killed in US drone strike, US, Pakistani officials say

    EPA, file

    Hakimullah Mehsud, center, leader of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (Movement of Pakistani Taliban), talks with journalists in Pakistan's Orakzai tribal agency near the Afghanistan border on Nov. 26, 2008.

    The leader of the Pakistan Taliban was killed Friday in a U.S. drone strike in Northwest Pakistan, U.S. and Pakistani officials tell NBC News. 


    A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed  the death of Hakimullah Mehsud, head of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), in a CIA drone strike. 

    A Pakistani security official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, told NBC News earlier that Mehsud was killed earlier in the day in Danday Darpakhel village of North Waziristan.  

    A senior member of the Pakistani Taliban, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed the death.

    "It is very painful to announce that our dearest, brave and sincere leader Hakimullah Mehsud died in drone attack," he said.


    The U.S. official said he could not confirm other deaths in the attack, but reports in Pakistani news media said a total of four people were killed and five others injured in the strikes, which targeted a compound. The dead reportedly included two other senior TTP officials, Abdullah Bahar Mehsud, Hakimullah Mehsud's new deputy, and commander Tariq Afridi, the TTP commander in Pakistan's Dara Adamkhel region.

    A senior Pakistani security official told NBC News that the country was placed on an increased state of alert to pre-empt retaliatory attacks by the Taliban. 

    The senior Pakistani Taliban member said the TTP held an emergency meeting in the tribal areas soon after learning of Mehsud's death and selected two commanders -- Maulvi Omar Khalid Khurasani, commander in the Mahmand tribal region, and Maulana Fazlullah, head of the Swat Taliban -- as possible replacements for Mehsud, who had a $5 million reward on his head posted by the U.S.

    "Among these two men, one will replace our slain emir,” he said. 

    The TTP has waged a decade-long insurgency against the Pakistani government from sanctuaries along the Afghan border. It has mainly targeted the Pakistani government, in suicide bombings and other attacks, but has on occasion helped the Afghan Taliban in their war against U.S.-led NATO troops in Afghanistan.

    The TTP also has claimed claims responsibility for a failed bombing plot in New York City's Times Square in 2010 as well as an attack on Camp Chapman in Afghanistan's Khost province in 2009 that killed seven CIA officials. 

    Pakistan's new prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, announced after his election in May that he would open unconditional talks with the Taliban and Mehsud's death came as the Pakistani government was preparing to send a peace delegation to talk with the TTP. 

    Hakimullah Mehsud took over the Pakistani Taliban's leadership in 2009 when his predecessor, Baitullah Mehsud, was killed in a U.S. drone strike. 

    He came to prominence as a young, brash field commander of the Pakistani Taliban in the mid-2000s, often appearing in propaganda videos. 

    U.S. officials told NBC News early last month that Mehsud’s second-in-command, Latif Mehsud, had been captured in Afghanistan by U.S. troops.

    The Washington Post reported at the time that Latif Mehsud was captured as he traveled with an Afghan government convoy, and that his arrest had infuriated Afghan President Hamid Karzai. 

    The day after Latif Mehsud’s capture was reported on Oct. 8, Hakimullah Mehsud said in an interview with the BBC that he was open to “serious talks” with the Pakistani government aimed at reaching a peace agreement.

    The drone strike was the second since Sharif visited Washington last month and pressed the Obama admistration to halt the attacks, which are seen by most Pakistanis as a violation of the country’s sovereignty.

    NBC News’ Fazal Ahad, Courtney Kube, Fazul Rahim, Fakhar Remhan and Robert Windrem and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook 

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own. Click here to read more about this tool.

  • Open-source advocates to government: Let us help you fix healthcare.gov

    NBC News

    A computer screenshot shows the federal government's health insurance marketplace, healthcare.gov.

    As computer experts hired by the U.S. government scramble to fix the much-maligned healthcare.gov website, a corps of independent kibitzers is chiming in from around the world, publicizing coding flaws that they’ve discovered and offering suggestions for fixing them.


    Much of the constructive criticism is coming from members of the “open source” community, a passionate but loose-knit group that advocates openness and collaboration as a means of writing better computer software. Their desire to help solve the federal government’s website woes in part stems from an early decision by the Department of Health and Human Services to make the healthcare.gov code available for examination – a promise that was never fully fulfilled.

    Sam Reed, a JavaScript developer from Washington, D.C., currently working in Hong Kong, is one of the driving forces in the effort. When healthcare.gov ran into trouble immediately after its Oct. 1 launch, he downloaded key parts of the code, shared it into an online repository at GitHub and set about analyzing and improving it. He also invited others to do the same in the hopes that federal contractors on the project would see their work.


    “If we can get the open-source community involved in the issue, people in the trenches (working for the government) can see the fixes,” said Reed, who has previously worked on government projects.

    It’s not clear whether HHS or the federal contractors that created various components of healthcare.gov -- most notably Quality Sofware Systems Inc., or QSSI, and CGI Federal, which was in charge of making all the parts of the system work together -- are taking notice of the independent efforts. CGI Federal declined to comment to NBC News, and a request to QSSI for comment went unanswered. HHS also didn't respond to requests for comment. 

    Courtesy of Sam Reed

    Sam Reed, a javascript developer working in Hong Kong, is trying to help healthcare.gov succeed by identifying key flaws and rewriting the code.

    It is well established that the government’s website, which is critical to getting consumers to sign up for Obamacare, has been plagued with usability problems since it went live. It also has suffered outages that continued this week, including a failure Tuesday night at a Verizon Terramark data center that persisted into Wednesday and provided an embarrassing moment for Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius when she testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

    Last Friday, White House economic adviser Jeff Zients, who has been tasked with fixing the site, said that QSSI would oversee the job. “We are confident that by the end of the November, healthcare.gov will be smooth for the vast majority of users,” he said.

    Since then, HHS has held daily briefings for reporters and listed improvements on a blog.

    Reed, however, said he has already produced a simpler, cleaner version of the software that could run on the desktop of consumers’ personal computers, allowing them to create accounts, browse insurance plans and sign up for coverage – all without many of the headaches that have been plaguing the government’s site.

    Among the changes Reed said he has made to his version of the site:

    • Repairing an error-ridden section listing state codes, which produced errors, used valuable computing resources and would have hampered residents of Wyoming trying to sign up for coverage because developers failed to account for the presence of the District of Columbia when they capped the number of states at 50.
    • Using a process known as “minifying” to collapse individual JavaScript commands into more sophisticated but less resource-intensive operations. The original code, as other analyses have pointed out, resulted in a huge drain on users’ computer resources and long load times on the site.
    • Removing Latin phrasing left amid the code as dummy text, including some phrases that actually appeared in error messages generated by healthcare.gov. 

    Reed noted that programmers working to fix healthcare.gov have addressed some of the same issues he has found.

    Peter Durham, a software architect at NBC News, reviewed Reed’s work on GitHub and agreed that the changes would make the site run faster on computers with slower connections, although the difference would not be as apparent with faster connections. He also pointed out that Reed’s version must still communicate with the same servers at various government agencies and contractors that the real healthcare.gov accesses, so it would still be susceptible to outages like the one at Terramark.

    Other independent efforts have focused on security issues.

    Ben Simo, a software tester based in Phoenix and a past president of the Association of Software Testers, said his involvement stemmed from trying to retrieve his own password on healthcare.gov. When he did so, he said, he found that his username and password reset code were being returned to his browser without authentication, a potential security hole.

    Simo said that he reported the flaw on the site’s help line and by Monday, it was fixed. But he said the same information was still being passed to third-party analytics companies, a practice that he called inappropriate. He said Thursday that that flaw, too, had been fixed. (A summary of the issues found before the latest fix are available on his blog.)

    Reed argues that making this an open-source project would have contributed to the site’s security.

    “Hiding the code and assuming that nobody will be able to get into it because they cannot find it is not real security,” he said. “If anything, I think it makes (a site) susceptible because it creates a false sense of security.”

    Courtesy of Sam Reed

    A computer screenshot shows part of the workflow that Sam Reed has been using in trying to improve the performance of the healthcare.gov website.

    Open-source advocates were excited when Health and Human Services CTO Bryan Sivak said this spring that the code for the site would be open for examination. But only the part of the front-end code produced by Development Seed was made available through GitHub, and that effort has been criticized by open-source advocates as incomplete.

    Then, after the Oct. 1 launch of healthcare.gov, people started using the comments section to vent anger about the site’s usability rather than talking about the code itself. The repository was removed at the government’s request.

    That prompted Reed to go into healthcare.gov and grab the files that run the marketplace enrollment application, code that was built by CGI Federal. He put those files on GitHub and asked other coders and programmers to look for problems and suggest fixes that would make the site run more smoothly.   

    Matthew McCall, an open-source advocate who has been a Presidential Innovation Fellow, has posted a petition on the White House website asking the government to release all the source code written by CGI Federal. “It is believed that the enrollment issues with healthcare.gov are likely due to poor coding practices in components that are unavailable to the world's development community to evaluate,” the petition says. “Please release the code so we may help fix any found issues.”

    By Thursday, however, the petition had fewer than 3,000 of the 100,000 signatures needed by Nov. 19 to gain a response from the Obama administration.

    In the meantime, the public appears divided on whether the website is repairable. In an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll taken over the weekend, 37 percent said these are short-term technical woes that can be fixed, while 31 percent believe they point to a longer-term issue with the law’s design that can’t be corrected, and 30 percent think it’s too soon to say.

    “The only option is to fix it,” said Reed, who believes that starting over from the ground up, as some have suggested the government do, isn’t practical because of the amount of time that would take. “And the code is fixable. It’s not the worst code that I’ve ever seen.”

    Related:

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook 

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own. Click here to read more about this tool.

  • San Diego drug tunnel held 8 tons of marijuana, 325 lbs of cocaine

    Sandy Huffaker / Getty Images

    Drug cartels build elaborate tunnels, some with rail tracks and lighting, under the Mexican border to smuggle drugs into the U.S.

    Authorities have discovered a new and “highly sophisticated” drug tunnel, complete with rail tracks, ventilation and lighting, under the border between San Diego and Mexico, and seized more than eight tons of marijuana and 325 pounds of cocaine. 


    The San Diego Tunnel Task Force, which includes members of ICE, the DEA and Customs and Border Protection, found the tunnel on Wednesday, just south of the Otay Mesa border crossing in Tijuana, Mexico. Authorities said that the tunnel, which linked two warehouses, was found before it was used, and three people were arrested.

    Authorities said at a news conference Thursday afternoon that the so-called "supertunnel" zig-zagged for about a third of a mile at an average depth of 35 feet.


    The discovery of cocaine marked the first time the drug was found in a San Diego-area border tunnel.

    Nearly four dozen tunnels have been discovered under the Mexican border over the past five years. Most are used to smuggle drugs into the U.S. While some are crude holes in the grounds, others have had lighting, ventilation and even elevators.

    Tunnels are common in the San Diego area, where there are many warehouses close to the border. Many are financed by drug cartels. Tunnels often run from a camouflaged hole in the floor of one warehouse to another warehouse on the other side of the border, though they have also been found in private homes.

    ICE/ AFP - Getty Images

    U.S. and Mexican authorities have uncovered a "highly sophisticated" tunnel used to smuggle drugs beneath their common border, officials said Thursday. The tunnel was shut down Wednesday night after being discovered under the border between San Diego and Tijuana, just over the border in Mexico.

    The tunnel uncovered Wednesday night, which emerged near Tijuana’s airport 100 yards south of the U.S. border, was near the location of a similar sophisticated tunnel discovered two years ago.

    In a news release, ICE said the tunnel was revealed after a box truck that had been under surveillance was pulled over by police in the suburb of Chula Vista for traffic violations on Saturday -- and three tons of marijuana were found inside. The rest of the marijuana was found in another box truck attempting to leave a warehouse in Chula Vista and at the Otay Mesa warehouse that contained one entrance to the tunnel. The cocaine was found in a van that had been seen leaving the Otay Mesa warehouse, ICE said in the release

    Video released by ICE showed officers entering a large warehouse in the Otay Mesa section of San Diego, then crawling into a hole cut in a concrete floor.

    Rail tracks are seen in the narrow tunnel below, and authorities said it also had lighting and ventilation. The video shows agents pulling bales of drugs from a lower hole and handing it into the tunnel, then up into the warehouse.

    U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy noted at Thursday's news conference that the tunnel cost drug traffickers "years and tens of millions of dollars" to build, but it was closed down before it could be used.

    “They did not move one gram of narcotics through that tunnel,” said Bill Sherman, DEA special agent in charge.

    At a news conference Thursday afternoon, Derek Benner, ICE special agent in charge, had a message for the smuggling ring, NBCSanDiego.com reported.

    "We are by no means finished here," Benner said. "Don't say we didn't warn you."

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

  • NSA, British intelligence secretly tapped into Google, Yahoo cable links, officials say

    As part of a long-standing effort to spy on foreign-to-foreign intelligence targets, the National Security Agency and British intelligence services have secretly tapped into Google and Yahoo communications links at collection centers scattered around the world, scooping up metadata on hundreds of millions of accounts — including those belonging to many Americans, NBC News has confirmed.

    The agencies collect vast quantities of metadata on Americans who live, work or travel overseas if they use a foreign phone or email address, officials told NBC News.

    But officials strongly rebutted a Wednesday report in The Washington Post, citing documents provided to the newspaper by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, claiming that the program is designed as a "back door" to the records of U.S. users of Google and Yahoo.

    "If you've got a U.S. area code, you are filtered out," said a senior U.S. official familiar with the programs — one of which is called "MUSCULAR." That program is operated jointly with the NSA's British counterpart, the Government Communications Headquarters, according to the Post's report.

    The official added that the taps do not mean that the content of phone calls or emails is routinely read.

    Data collected are not identifiable to any person unless they are judged to be a "valid intelligence target," the official said. If a person is deemed as such, intelligence services would then call up the account, review emails or listen to the content of telephone calls.

    "Collecting metadata does not authorize reading emails or listening to calls. It is literally not identifiable," the official said. "It is not until we go back with a particular selector — where we can input it into a system — that it turns into something intelligible."

    Officials said the length for which data are kept varies by region.

    "We are talking about hard physical collection — on cables," a top official told NBC News.

    Another official said congressional committees have been briefed on the tapping programs, adding: "What we are running into is members who did not go to a briefing or did not review the information."

    Meanwhile, U.S. officials strongly deny an Italian report that the NSA eavesdropped on the Vatican.

    "That is completely not true. It is made up. It did not happen. Categorically untrue," said a top official.

    Reuters reported that when asked to comment on the claims in the Italian publication Panorama, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said: "We are not aware of anything on this issue and in any case we have no concerns about it."

    NBC News' Daniel Arkin contributed to this report.

  • Tax delinquents by the thousands have security clearances, GAO finds

    Susan Walsh / AP file

    One government worker with a security clearance owed the Internal Revenue Service $2 million, according to the General Accounting Office.

    Thousands of tax delinquents -- including one who owes $2 million to the IRS -- have sensitive security clearances, posing a risk that has gone undetected by federal agencies, congressional investigators will report Thursday.


    A report by the General Accounting Office obtained by NBC News found that 8,400 U.S. officials and contractors with access to sensitive government secrets have racked up $85 million in delinquent tax debts.  

    The report, due to be released Thursday morning at a Senate hearing, is the latest example of what members of Congress and investigators say are glaring weaknesses in the government’s system of vetting those receiving security clearances. 

    “It is absurd to give federal employees and contractors who have already failed to follow the law access to our nation’s classified information,” said Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, ranking Republican on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, who requested the GAO study. “Awarding security clearances to tax cheats puts the integrity of the federal work force, along with the confidential materials entrusted with them, at greater risk. 

    Coburn, in a statement to NBC News, demanded that the administration take immediate steps to stop what he called the “egregious” practice of granting security clearances to tax delinquents.

    A spokesman for Director of National Intelligence James Clapper declined comment, noting that the report had not yet been publicly released. But in written comments to the GAO, a Clapper aide noted that the intelligence office and the Office of Personnel Management were working with Treasury Department officials to develop a plan to check and more closely monitor government databases to identify tax delinquents with security clearances.

    The GAO study did not examine members of the U.S. military or employees of U.S. intelligence agencies with clearances. Instead, it focused on a universe of 240,000 officials and contractors with clearances elsewhere in the government — such as the Homeland Security, State and Energy departments. It then took the Social Security numbers of those with clearances and plugged them into an Internal Revenue Service database of tax delinquents, yielding matches to about 4,800 individuals — about half of whom had top-secret clearances, the report says.

    More than three-fourths of the tax delinquents amassed their debts only after receiving their clearances — an indication, congressional investigators said, that those with access to sensitive secrets were not being adequately monitored.

    The report does not name any of the tax delinquents. But it cited several examples: One of the delinquents with a clearance owed $2 million in back taxes, the report states. Another federal contractor with a top-secret clearance didn’t file federal tax returns for several years and was granted a “conditional clearance” despite concerns among background checkers about his financial problems.

    The GAO report states that an official or contractor with tax debts is “at risk of having to engage in illegal acts to generate funds” – and therefore could put national security secrets at risk. (Some high profile espionage cases, such as those of former CIA agent Aldrich Ames and FBI agent Robert Hanssen, sold secrets to Russia for cash, although neither was in debt.)

    But the report notes that the current federal background check system does not check federal tax databases before granting clearances. Instead, it relies on “self-reporting” of debts and checking of credit reports – which do not disclose tax debts unless liens have been filed.

    The issue of federal background checks has taken on new urgency after revelations that Washington Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis was granted a secret clearance for 10 years despite multiple security problems in his background, including a 2002 arrest for shooting the tires of a neighbor’s car. Alexis’ arrest, which he blamed on anger problems and which did not result in criminal charges, was never fully investigated by the private company, USIS, hired to do his background check.

    USIS, now the subject of a federal grand jury probe, also performed the background check of ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowden, failing to interview any personal references other than his girlfriend. Nor did the firm investigate a reported security violation in his past, according to a report by the Office of Director of National Intelligence.

    USIS has denied any wrongdoing, saying its background checks in both instances met federal standards and that it is cooperating with the federal investigation. 

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

  • Sebelius defends Obamacare site's security, but questions mount

    Shawn Thew / EPA

    US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on the failures of the Affordable Care Act enrollment website on Oct. 30, 2013.

    Kathleen Sebelius apologized for the poor performance of the Obamacare website during a three-and-a-half hour grilling by Congress today, but the Health and Human Services secretary was forced to defend healthcare.gov against growing concerns that it may expose the private information of millions of users to hackers and identity thieves.


     “Don’t you think you had the obligation to the American people to tell them we’re going to put you in this system, but beware, your information is likely to be vulnerable?” Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., asked Sebelius.

    Rogers cited a memo written to Medicare head Marilyn Tavenner just days before the site’s Oct. 1 launch that said security testing was not completed, and asked if Sebelius would commit to shutting down the system for a security test.

    Sebelius said that HHS officials were taking steps to tighten security and that final authority to operate the website “on a permanent basis” will not be signed until that is completed.


    “(Testing) is underway right now,” said Sebelius. “(D)aily and weekly monitoring and testing is underway.” 

    The Sept. 27 memo, obtained by NBC News, warned the head of Medicare that a private contractor had not completed testing of the site, exposing “a level of uncertainty that can be deemed as a high risk.”

    In a statement, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services told NBC News, “When consumers fill out their online Marketplace applications, they can trust that the information they’re providing is protected by stringent security standards and that the technology underlying the application process has been tested and is secure.”

    Cybersecurity expert Alex McGeorge said that the government’s responses Wednesday were not reassuring.

    “This is a very, very enticing target for attackers because it’s very simple to turn personal identifying info into hard currency,” said McGeorge. “You have to weigh the privacy risks of, ‘I'm going to put all my information with the government in this one basket in order to receive healthcare.’ And one of the risks that you take is well, if it's all in one basket, it could be stolen from that basket.”

    In an interview with NBC News, a former top government official raised his own questions about the site’s security, and about the healthcare.gov’s privacy protections. Michael Astrue, the Bush appointee who served as head of the Social Security Administration from 2007 until early this year, said that the Obama administration exempted the website from many federal privacy protections, potentially making the personal data on healthcare.gov accessible to a range of government and private entities, including the Department of Homeland Security to credit agencies.

    “There were shortcuts taken on the information technology,” said Astrue, “and there were shortcuts taken in terms of adherence to the laws that protect our rights.”

    According to Astrue, concerns about privacy protections were the subject of debate within the administration before launch. But Astrue said that his warnings that the site’s design should not contravene the Federal Privacy Act were ignored.  “I was extremely upset,” said Astrue. “First of all they were violating the statute. Second, there would be real world consequences for Americans.”

    Three weeks after healthcare.gov launched, administration officials granted 13 exemptions to the Privacy Act permitting sensitive personal data being entered into healthcare.gov and the state health insurance exchanges to be shared with agency contractors, consultants, the Department of Homeland Security, state and local governments, employers and family members. The exemptions are displayed in fine print on healthcare.gov.

    Astrue said that credit agencies will also be able to access the data, and the category of family members could include estranged spouses. He said estranged spouses could conceivably use the system to confirm an address.

    Administration officials said the exemptions are essential – to determine if people qualify for health insurance subsidies – and that they have taken important precautions, including encrypting data, to protect security.

    But Astrue says that in the race to make the deadline the administration jeopardized privacy protection.

    “Many of their systems were put up quickly, shoddily, and tied together shoddily,” said Astrue. “It’s a hacker’s dream.”

    Deborah Peel, a doctor who heads the advocacy group Patient Privacy Rights, shares Astrue’s alarm about access to the personal information on the government sites. 

    “There's a hidden army of government and industry and corporations that are going to also be accessing and using our data and that's scary," said Peel. "We don't know who they are. We need to at a minimum be able to have real time lists of who's looking at our information and why."

    Astrue said he talked to senior officials at the Health and Human Services Dept., the White House and the Office of Management and Budget about potential privacy problems. When he raised privacy concerns, however, he said that the officials, including top aides to Sebelius, pointed to the Oct. 1 roll-out date for the Affordable Care Act.

    They reacted with a “shrug,” he said. “’You know we’re going to hit Oct. 1.’ That was the mantra.”

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

  • GAO: Some security guards at federal facilities not trained for 'shooter' incidents

    A House hearing on last month's Navy Yard shooting has revealed what may have been a serious lack of training for security personnel. NBC's Pete Williams reports.

    Some of the 13,500 private security guards assigned to protect federal buildings lack training on how to respond to an active shooter, according to a government audit released Wednesday.


    Since 2010, the Department of Homeland Security has required that its guards receive active shooter training. But the Government Accountability Office informed Congress that a spot check of private contractors found five companies who say their guards received no such training.

    "Without ensuring that all guards receive this training, the Federal Protective Service has limited assurance that its guards are prepared for such a threat," the report said.


    Eleven other contractors surveyed said the guards they provide have received some active shooter training.

    The Homeland Security Department’s Federal Protective Service is responsible for protecting federal employees and visitors at approximately 9,600 federal facilities managed by the General Services Administration. The service has its own sworn law enforcement officers, but also hires private security guards to help it accomplish its mission.

    DHS officials testified on Wednesday before a House homeland security subcommittee that a guard's primary responsibility is to send an immediate notice -- by phone and radio -- of an active shooter attack, and to make certain employees can get out safely and that no other intruders get in.

    In remote areas, where a quick law enforcement response is unlikely, they said, a guard is expected to take further action. But the guard's response may be constrained, they said, because state laws limit what can be done by someone who's not a sworn officer.

    GAO also said the government must do more to ensure that guards assigned to checkpoints using metal detectors have received the proper training in using the machines.  "An official at one contract guard company stated that 133 of its approximately 350 guards ... have never received their initial X-ray magnetometer training," the GAO report said. "Some of these guards are working at screening posts."

    Concern over the training of the FPS guards was heightened by the Sept. 16 shooting at the Washington Navy Yard. A former Navy reservist, Aaron Alexis, killed 12 people inside the building where he worked before being fatally shot by police.

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook 

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

     

  • Lawmakers demand stop to parents giving away adopted kids on Internet

    The process is called "rehoming" and it happens when parents drop off their unwanted internationally adopted children with other families. Hear one adoptee's personal tale. NBC's Kate Snow reports. 

    CHICAGO -- U.S. lawmakers called Tuesday for federal action to prevent parents from giving unwanted adopted children to strangers met on the Internet, and the Illinois attorney general urged Facebook and Yahoo to police online groups where children may be advertised.

    The demands come as nations whose orphans have been adopted by Americans contend that the U.S. government isn't doing enough to stop the practice, known as "private re-homing."


    A joint Reuters and NBC News investigation last month revealed an underground market where desperate parents seek new families for children they adopted but no longer want. The parents connect through online forums on Yahoo and Facebook, privately arranging custody transfers that can bypass government oversight and sometimes violate the law.


    No government agencies track the practice, but the news service identified eight Internet groups in which members discussed, facilitated or engaged in re-homing. In a single Yahoo group that the company has since taken down, a child was offered to strangers on average once a week during a five-year period. At least 70 percent of those children were listed as having been adopted from overseas.

    The Reuters and NBC News series identified re-homed children who endured severe abuse and adults who used the online network to obtain children but were not properly vetted. In one case, a man now serving prison time for child pornography took home a 10-year-old boy he and a friend found online earlier that day. They picked up the boy in a motel parking lot.

    On Tuesday, 18 federal lawmakers called for a Congressional hearing on re-homing. In a letter submitted to a House subcommittee that oversees adoption, the bipartisan group said the news agency's series "drew attention to the many disturbing dangers and problems associated with this practice." The group, led by U.S. Rep. Jim Langevin (D-RI), said a hearing would "identify ways to prevent these dangerous practices."

    To see a database of the messages advertising unwanted adopted children, click here.

    Richard Rodriguez / REUTERS

    Anna Barnes was adopted from Russia as a child and brought to the US then subsequently adopted by Lisa and Gary Barnes. Photographed in Granbury, Texas Thursday May 30, 2013.

    'OVERSIGHT AND PROSECUTION'

    In the letter, the U.S. lawmakers also requested a study by the investigative arm of Congress, the Government Accountability Office. The study would identify gaps in state and federal laws "related to the oversight and prosecution of wrong-doers in the re-homing of children." It also would identify ways to better support struggling adoptive families.

    In a separate letter to Obama administration officials – including the U.S. attorney general and the heads of the departments of State, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services – Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) called for a broad federal response. Wyden wrote that the Reuters stories demonstrated that advertising children online "does not seem to violate any federal laws" and called on the Obama administration to recommend a "minimum federal standard" to govern re-homing.

    An agreement among states is supposed to prohibit parents from transferring custody of a child to a non-relative across state lines without approval of officials in both states. But the agreement is rarely enforced. Some state laws prohibit anyone without a child-placing license from facilitating adoptions or advertising children for adoption. Many states place no restrictions on the activity, and no uniform federal law exists. Wyden called it "stunning" that "investigation and enforcement is left to largely disparate state practices."

    "Finding families for vulnerable children should never be a do-it-yourself process that involves nothing more than placing or responding to an advertisement online," Wyden wrote. He asked each of the agencies to "make further recommendations to Congress on what additional authority may be needed in order to stop the practice of advertising children online for de-facto adoptions that occur outside of a formal, legal process."

    "Federal law should clearly prohibit the trafficking of children through this unconscionable practice," Wyden said in his letter.

    The apparent lack of response by U.S. authorities to re-homing has angered some nations. Days after the articles were published, the Democratic Republic of Congo announced it was not allowing children to leave the country for adoption. "This suspension is due to concerns over reports that children … may be either abused by adoptive families or adopted by a second set of parents once in their receiving countries," according to a U.S. State Department alert posted Sept 27 on its website. Congolese officials did not comment.

    Read the full Reuters investigation of the Child Exchange here
    Adopted girl says mother forced her to dig her own grave

    Samantha Sais / Reuters file

    Nicole Eason sits inside her Tucson, Arizona home May 7, 2013. Eason has taken in more than a half-dozen children, many from failed international adoptions, during the past decade.

    CONCERN ABROAD

    China and Russia are among other countries that expressed concern over the U.S. government's handling of the issue.

    In a statement on re-homing released last month, the State Department said it was "deeply troubled by the information revealed in recent reports of parents who advertise their children online and turn over physical custody to other individuals without the safeguards of state or local government oversight. The Reuters reports highlighted examples in which this practice put the welfare of vulnerable children at extreme risk."

    The State Department offered no details about whether it would try to track children brought to the United States, but said it is "committed to ensuring that reliable safeguards for the wellbeing of children are in place."

    At the state level, meanwhile, lawmakers in Florida and Wisconsin are drafting legislation to address re-homing. Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan sent letters on Monday to Yahoo and Facebook urging both companies to aggressively police their sites for re-homing activity.

    Yahoo shut down all of the re-homing groups on its site that Reuters brought to its attention. A Facebook spokesman said the company had no plans to take down a popular but private page called Way Stations of Love, where adoptive parents sometimes seek new homes for unwanted children.

    In a letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Madigan called on the company to take down the page and "ensure this practice never again finds a home on Facebook." Madigan wrote that Facebook’s initial response to questions about the page – that "the Internet is a reflection of society" – "suggests your company is comfortable with its website being used to facilitate this illegal conduct."

    Watch an interview with Reuters reporter Megan Twohey.

    A DIFFICULT BALANCE

    "I understand the difficulty your company faces as it balances freedom of speech protections with the equally important challenge of limiting troubling content," Madigan wrote. "Yet, in cases such as these, where illegal acts of 're-homing' are occurring, or likely to occur, there is no justification for allowing this conduct to continue unabated on Facebook."

    A Facebook spokesman said the company "has received Attorney General Madigan's letter and we look forward to responding to her office's questions in full." A Yahoo spokesperson said the company it had already taken "the 're-homing' groups down" and that it looks "forward to working with the Attorney General on this issue." 

    At a hearing Tuesday before the Illinois House of Representative's adoption reform committee, state lawmakers called for better support services for adoptive families and for more safeguards for adopted children. They also pressed state officials about why they didn't do more to prevent illegal re-homing cases detailed by Reuters, specifically those involving former Illinois couple Nicole and Calvin Eason.

    Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, a Democrat, said that when she adopted a cat earlier this year, she signed a contract that prohibited her from re-homing the pet. "My cat has more protections than the children I'm talking about," she said.

    Erik Jones, a state assistant attorney general, testified that his office quickly alerted authorities in Arizona, where the Easons are now living, after reading the articles "because there could be ongoing threats to children." The series recounted how Nicole Eason took in at least six boys and girls from adoptive parents whom she met on the Internet after authorities removed both of her biological children from her care. In addition, she and her husband, Calvin Eason, were each accused of sexually abusing children they had babysat. Nicole took custody of one child when she was living with a pedophile who is now in prison for trading child pornography.

    Adopted girl says new 'mom' slept naked with her

    ARIZONA INVESTIGATION

    "We learned that the Easons had relocated to Arizona and investigators from our office immediately reached out to law enforcement officials in Arizona," Jones said. 

    Jones said Arizona authorities later learned that two children were living with the Easons, and Arizona Child Protective Services removed the children from the home. "We have not yet learned who the parents are, or where they are located," Jones said. "However, the children who were in the (Eason) home are now safe and that was our number one priority."

    The Easons confirmed that they have been interviewed by police and child welfare workers in Tucson, Ariz. They would not discuss what they were asked. "I’m not worried about it," Nicole Eason said of the investigations in a phone interview last week. "Why should I be worried about it?"

    A police report shows that authorities removed two children who were living in a hotel room with the Easons. The children, the report says, had not been attending school. Their names and ages were blacked out.

    In the phone interview, Eason said authorities have no right to investigate what happens in her home. "Whatever happens behind my closed doors is my business, not anyone else's." She added: "Until there’s a murder investigation, absolutely not. Stay out of my business."

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook 

     

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

  • Obama administration knew millions could not keep their health insurance

    Larry Downing / Reuters

    President Barack Obama walks out to deliver remarks about the Affordable Care Act in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on Oct. 1, 2013.

    President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.


    Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC News that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”


    None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date -- the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example -- the policy would not be grandfathered.

    Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”  

    That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them.

    Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”

    “This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said  Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.

    The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs.

    “One of the main goals of the law is to ensure that people have insurance they can rely on – that doesn’t discriminate or charge more based on pre-existing conditions.  The consumers who are getting notices are in plans that do not provide all these protections – but in the vast majority of cases, those same insurers will automatically shift their enrollees to a plan that provides new consumer protections and, for nearly half of individual market enrollees, discounts through premium tax credits,” said White House spokesperson Jessica Santillo.

    “Nothing in the Affordable Care Act forces people out of their health plans: The law allows plans that covered people at the time the law was enacted to continue to offer that same coverage to the same enrollees – nothing has changed and that coverage can continue into 2014,” she said.

    The Affordable Care Act will not affect most traditional employer-based plans, but many of those who purchased insurance policies on their own will see higher premiums. This is in part due to the 10 essential health benefits insurance providers are now required to include. NBC's Peter Alexander reports.

    Individual insurance plans with low premiums often lack basic benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, or carry high deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. The Affordable Care Act requires all companies to offer more benefits, such as mental health care, and also bars companies from denying coverage for preexisting conditions.

    Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president’s promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care. “What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide,” Carney said. “So it's true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don't meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act.”

    Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests “anywhere from 50 to 75 percent” of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is “probably about right.” She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.

    A spokesman for America's Health Plans says there are no precise numbers on how many will receive cancellations letters or get notices that their current policies don’t meet ACA standards. In both cases, consumers will not be able to keep their current coverage.

    Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.

    George Schwab, 62, of North Carolina, said he was "perfectly happy" with his plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield, which also insured his wife for a $228 monthly premium. But this past September, he was surprised to receive a letter saying his policy was no longer available. The "comparable" plan the insurance company offered him carried a $1,208 monthly premium and a $5,500 deductible.

    And the best option he’s found on the exchange so far offered a 415 percent jump in premium, to $948 a month.

    "The deductible is less," he said, "But the plan doesn't meet my needs. Its unaffordable."

    "I'm sitting here looking at this, thinking we ought to just pay the fine and just get insurance when we're sick," Schwab added. "Everybody's worried about whether the website works or not, but that's fixable. That's just the tip of the iceberg. This stuff isn't fixable." 
     
    Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, is raising a new baby while running her own PR firm. She said she received a letter last July from Cigna, her insurance company, that said the company would no longer offer her individual plan, and promised to send a letter by October offering a comparable option. So far, she hasn't received anything. 
     
    "I'm completely overwhelmed with a six-month-old and a business,” said Goldwater. “The last thing I can do is spend hours poring over a website that isn't working, trying to wrap my head around this entire health care overhaul."

    Goldwater said she supports the new law and is grateful for provisions helping folks like her with pre-existing conditions, but she worries she won’t be able to afford the new insurance, which is expected to cost more because it has more benefits. "I'm jealous of people who have really good health insurance," she said. "It's people like me who are stuck in the middle who are going to get screwed." 
     
    Richard Helgren, a Lansing, Mich., retiree, said he was “irate” when he received a letter informing him that his wife Amy's $559 a month health plan was being changed because of the law. The plan the insurer offered raised his deductible from $0 to $2,500, and the company gave him 17 days to decide.

    The higher costs spooked him and his wife, who have painstakingly planned for their retirement years. "Every dollar we didn't plan for erodes our standard of living," Helgren said.

    Ulltimately, though Helgren opted not to shop through the ACA exchanges, he was able to apply for a good plan with a slightly lower premium through an insurance agent.

    He said he never believed President Obama’s promise that people would be able to keep their current plans.

    "I heard him only about a thousand times," he said. "I didn't believe him when he said it though because there was just no way that was going to happen. They wrote the regulations so strictly that none of the old polices can grandfather."

    For months, Laszewski has warned that some consumers will face sticker shock. He recently got his own notice that he and his wife cannot keep their current policy, which he described as one of the best, so-called "Cadillac" plans offered for 2013. Now, he said, the best comparable plan he found for 2014 has a smaller doctor network, larger out-of-pocket costs, and a 66 percent premium increase.

    “Mr. President, I like the coverage I have," Laszweski said. "It is the best health insurance policy you can buy."

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook

    Investigate this!

    Read and vote on readers' story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.

  • Obama admin. knew millions could not keep their health insurance

    Larry Downing / Larry Downing / Reuters

    President Barack Obama walks out to deliver remarks on the Affordable Care Act in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on Oct. 1, 2013.

    By Lisa Myers and Hannah Rappleye
    NBC News

    President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.

    This story has been republished here

    Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC NEWS that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”  

    None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date -- the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example -- the policy would not be grandfathered.


    Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”  

    That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them. 

    Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”

    “This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said  Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.

    The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs.

    “One of the main goals of the law is to ensure that people have insurance they can rely on – that doesn’t discriminate or charge more based on pre-existing conditions.  The consumers who are getting notices are in plans that do not provide all these protections – but in the vast majority of cases, those same insurers will automatically shift their enrollees to a plan that provides new consumer protections and, for nearly half of individual market enrollees, discounts through premium tax credits,” said White House spokesperson Jessica Santillo.

    “Nothing in the Affordable Care Act forces people out of their health plans: The law allows plans that covered people at the time the law was enacted to continue to offer that same coverage to the same enrollees – nothing has changed and that coverage can continue into 2014,” she said.

    Individual insurance plans with low premiums often lack basic benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, or carry high deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. The Affordable Care Act requires all companies to offer more benefits, such as mental health care, and also bars companies from denying coverage for preexisting conditions.

    Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president’s promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care. “What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide,” Carney said. “So it's true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don't meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act.”

    Courtesy of Heather Goldwater

    Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, says that she received a letter from her insurer saying the company would no longer offer her plan, but hasn't yet received a follow-up letter with a comparable option.

    Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests “anywhere from 50 to 75 percent” of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is “probably about right.” She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.

    A spokesman for America's Health Plans says there are no precise numbers on how many will receive cancellations letters or get notices that their current policies don’t meet ACA standards. In both cases, consumers will not be able to keep their current coverage.

    Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.

    George Schwab, 62, of North Carolina, said he was "perfectly happy" with his plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield, which also insured his wife for a $228 monthly premium. But this past September, he was surprised to receive a letter saying his policy was no longer available. The "comparable" plan the insurance company offered him carried a $1,208 monthly premium and a $5,500 deductible.

    And the best option he’s found on the exchange so far offered a 415 percent jump in premium, to $948 a month.

    "The deductible is less," he said, "But the plan doesn't meet my needs. Its unaffordable."

    "I'm sitting here looking at this, thinking we ought to just pay the fine and just get insurance when we're sick," Schwab added. "Everybody's worried about whether the website works or not, but that's fixable. That's just the tip of the iceberg. This stuff isn't fixable."
     
    Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, is raising a new baby while running her own PR firm. She said she received a letter last July from Cigna, her insurance company, that said the company would no longer offer her individual plan, and promised to send a letter by October offering a comparable option. So far, she hasn't received anything.
     
    "I'm completely overwhelmed with a six-month-old and a business,” said Goldwater. “The last thing I can do is spend hours poring over a website that isn't working, trying to wrap my head around this entire health care overhaul."

    Goldwater said she supports the new law and is grateful for provisions helping folks like her with pre-existing conditions, but she worries she won’t be able to afford the new insurance, which is expected to cost more because it has more benefits. "I'm jealous of people who have really good health insurance," she said. "It's people like me who are stuck in the middle who are going to get screwed."
     
    Richard Helgren, a Lansing, Mich., retiree, said he was “irate” when he received a letter informing him that his wife Amy's $559 a month health plan was being changed because of the law. The plan the insurer offered raised his deductible from $0 to $2,500, and the company gave him 17 days to decide.

    The higher costs spooked him and his wife, who have painstakingly planned for their retirement years. "Every dollar we didn't plan for erodes our standard of living," Helgren said.

    Ulltimately, though Helgren opted not to shop through the ACA exchanges, he was able to apply for a good plan with a slightly lower premium through an insurance agent.

    He said he never believed President Obama’s promise that people would be able to keep their current plans.

    "I heard him only about a thousand times," he said. "I didn't believe him when he said it though because there was just no way that was going to happen. They wrote the regulations so strictly that none of the old polices can grandfather."

    For months, Laszewski has warned that some consumers will face sticker shock. He recently got his own notice that he and his wife cannot keep their current policy, which he described as one of the best, so-called "Cadillac" plans offered for 2013. Now, he said, the best comparable plan he found for 2014 has a smaller doctor network, larger out-of-pocket costs, and a 66 percent premium increase.

    “Mr. President, I like the coverage I have," Laszweski said. "It is the best health insurance policy you can buy."

    More from NBC News Investigations:

    Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook