No.1174
>But, it's different, first, in that surveillance can't be compared to whatever was that the ELF was fighting. That's much more pervasive and shit… The tactics wouldn't work as they can work with surveillance.
Surveillance lies somewhere between animal testing and ecological destruction in pervasiveness, I'm not sure what your point is.
>Now, as to the vague tactics… A parallel with ELF tactics would be something more like disabling and destroying surveillance cameras, but what I had in mind was more like, say, "smashing" majority shareholders of key surveillance businesses. If that actually became a somewhat widespread thing more or less globally, many shareholders of key surveillance businesses might just hurriedly change business or sell or just close, stock prices could start falling like hell, many others would find themselves out of business, and parts of the industry could collapse.
OK, so it's more like the ARM or the IAF or ITS. Whatever. Again, the idea seems the same.
No.1176
>>1175Ahaha, no
Surveillance is overrated anyway
No.1178
>>1177No, like putting key shareholders into newspaper boxes and launching them with a trebuchet
see
>>1176