| Total population |
| Unknown |
| Regions with significant populations |
| Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bundelkhand, Bihar, Jharkhand, Mauritius |
| Languages |
|
Hindi, Bhojpuri, Magadhi, Maithili, Angika, Vajjika, Bundeli[1]
|
| Religion |
|
 Hinduism
|
| Footnotes |
| Commonly called Babhan[2][3][4] |
Bhumihar or Babhan or Bhuin-har is a Hindu Brahmin community mainly found in the Indian states of Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bengal and Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh.[5][6][7]
Bhumihars are classified in the Brahmin varna of Indian caste system[1][8][9][10][11][12][13] Bhumihars are landowning Brahmins who came to own land in different periods of History through land grants by kings or during the rule of Brahmin kings.[14][15][16]
According to M. A. Sherring some of the Bhumihars belong to the Saryupareen Brahmin division of Kanyakubja Brahmins.[8] In the 19th (held at Prayag) and 20th (held at Lucknow) national convention of Kanyakubja Brahmins by Kanyakubja Mahati Sabha, in 1926 and 1927 respectively, it reiterated Bhumihars to be Kanyakubja Brahmins and appealed for unity among Kanyakubja Brahmins whose different branches included Sanadhya, Pahadi, Jujhoutia, Saryupareen, Chattisgarhi, Bhumihar and different Bengali Brahmins.[17] Bhumihars have been the traditional priests at Vishnupad Mandir in Gaya as Gayawar Pandas and in the adjoining districts like Hazaribagh.[1] The Kingdom of Kashi belonged to Bhumihar Brahmins and big zamindari like Bettiah Raj, Hathwa Raj and Tekari Raj belonged to them. Bhumihars were well respected Brahmins in the courts of Dumraon Maharaj, King of Nepal and Raj Darbhanga.[1] Some Mohyal Brahmins migrated eastward and are believed to constitute some sub-divisions of Bhumihars, some of whom are also descendants of Husseini Brahminss and mourn the death of Imam Hussain.[18] There is also a significant migrant population of Bhumihars in Mauritius,[19] Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana and others.
Bhumihars are commonly called Babhans[2][3][4][20][21] which is the Pali word for Brahmins[21][22][23] and is used to refer to Brahmins in Buddhist sources.[21][23][24][25][26] In recent times, Bhumihars have been in the forefront of casteist violence in some places of Bihar state.
When Parashurama destroyed the Kshatriya race, and he set up in their place the descendants of Brahmins, who, after a time, having mostly abandoned their priestly functions, took to land-owning (Zamindari).[27][28] Lord Parashurama was the first Bhumihar.[27][29]
The literal meaning of Bhumihar is Bhumi - "Land", kara or hara - "maker" in Sanskrit.[30] In the language of the Indian feudal system, Bhum is the name given to a kind of tenure similar to the Inams and Jagirs of Mohammedan times.[31] By a Bhum, according to the Rajputana gazeteer, a hereditary, non-resumable and inalienable property in the soil was inseparably bound up with the revenue-free title.[32] The meaning of the designation Bhumihar being as stated above, the Bhumihar Brahmins are evidently those Brahmins who held grants of land for secular services.[33] Bhum was given as compensation for bloodshed in order to quell a feud for distinguished services in the field, for protection of services in the field, for protection of a border, or for the watch and ward of a village.[34]
By the sixteenth century Bhumihars known as karm kandi pandit controlled vast stretches of territory, particularly in North Bihar.[35] In South Bihar, their most prominent representative was the Tekari family, whose great estate in Gaya dates back to the early eighteenth century.[35] With the decline of Mughal Empire, in the area of south of Avadh, in the fertile rive-rain rice growing areas of Benares, Gorakhpur, Deoria, Ghazipur, Ballia and Bihar and on the fringes of Bengal, it was the 'military' or Bhumihar Brahmins who strengthened their sway.[36] The distinctive 'caste' identity of Bhumihar Brahman emerged largely through military service, and then confirmed by the forms of continuous 'social spending' which defined a man and his kin as superior and lordly.[37] In 19th century, many of the Bhumihar Brahmins were zamindars. Of the 67000 Hindus in the Bengal Army in 1842, 28000 were identified as Rajputs and 25000 as Brahmins, a category that included Bhumihar Brahmins.[38] The Brahmin presence in the Bengal Army was reduced in the late nineteenth century because of their perceived primary role as mutineers in the Mutiny of 1857,[38] led by Mangal Pandey. Now, a majority of them are farmers with some big land-holders.
Some Bhumihars had settled in Chandipur, Murshidabad, Bardhaman during late nineteenth and early twentieth century where they are at the top of the social hierarchy.[39]
Pundit Yogendra Bhattacharya in his book "Hindu castes and sets" writes that Bhumihar Brahmin literally means landholder. The Bhumihar Brahmins are evidently those Bhrahmins who held grants of land for secular services. Whoever held a secular fief was Bhumihar. Where a Brahmin held such a tenure he was called a Bhumihar Brahmin.
Bhumihar Brahmins are sometimes simply called as Bhumihars. They perform all their religious ceremonies in the same manner as other Brahmins, but as they also practice secular occupations like the Laukik Brahmans of Southern India, they are not entitled to accept religious gifts or to minister to anyone as priest. The usual surnames/titles of the Bhumihar Brahmins are same as those of other Brahmins of Northern India. Being a fighter by caste few of them have Rajputana surnames/titles.
Before independence, it was the custom of the Bhumihar Brahmins to stage an elaborate Kālī puja, during which annual payments were made to servants and gifts of cloth were distributed to dependents, both Hindu and Muslim.[39]
M. A. Sherring in his book Hindu Tribes and Castes as Reproduced in Benaras[8] published in 1872, mentions, "Great important distinctions subsist between the various tribes of Brahmins. Some are given to learning, some to agriculture, some to politics and some to trades. The Maharashtra Brahmin is very different being from the Bengali, while the Kanaujia (Kanyakubja Brahmins) differs from both. Only those Brahmins who perform all six duties are reckoned perfectly orthodox. Some perform three of them, namely, the first, third and fifth and omit the other three. Hence Brahmins are divided into two kinds, the Shat-karmas and the tri-karmas or those who perform only three. The Bhumihar Brahmins for instance are tri-karmas, and merely pay heed to three duties. The Bhumihars, of whom many, though not all, belong to the Saryupareen Brahmin division, are a large and influential body in all that province (United Province)."
Bhumihars were referred to as "Military Brahmin" by Francis Buchanan and as "Magadh Brahmin" by William Adam in 1883.[40] William Crooke in his book, Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh,[41] has mentioned Bhuinhar as an important tribe of landowners and agriculturists in eastern districts and that they are also known as Babhan, Zamindar Brahman, Grihastha Brahman, or Pachchima or 'western' Brahmans.
The Brahmins and Kshatriyas look down upon the Bhumihars whom they claim to have descended from Brahmin men and Kshatriya women ( Can such an apocryphal , demeaning and wholly discreditable reference be made in regard to Bhumihar caste ? Isn't it sheer blatancy gone unnoticed ? The Brahmins and the Govt. of India having approbated the Brahminical status of Bhumihars , there cannot be tolerated such nonsensical talk ...... Somebody writes something and an idiot has the temerity to indulge in Libel against Bhumihars .....What if the same claim is made in regard to the author of such rubbish ? source of .[27] Pandit Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya says that according to legend prevalent among Brahmins, the Bhumihars were non-Brahmin Hindus who were conferred the status of Brahmins by a Raja who wanted more Brahmins in his kingdom in order to celebrate religious festivals.[27][42] This is a constructed legend which all Brahmin sub-castes have developed for all the other sub-castes in order to show that they are superior. Herbert Hope Risley holds the view that Bhumihars are an offshoot of the Rajputs as their clans and septs are closer to that of the Rajputs.[42] But it is not true, because clans and septs are also present in Maithila Brahmins and Saraswat Brahmins, making them also as offshoots of rajputs by this reasoning.[27] A widely prevalent belief is that they had descended from the Bhuyans, a tribe which acquired land and claimed to be Brahmins.[42]
Pandit Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya in his book Hindu Castes and Sects published in 1896, went on to write about the origin of Bhumihar Brahmins of Bihar and Banaras[9] as: "The clue to the exact status of the Bhumihar Brahmans is afforded by their very name. The word literally means a landholder. In the language of the Indian feudal systems, Bhoom is the name given to a kind of tenure similar to the Inams and Jagirs of Mohammedan times. By a Bhoom, according to the Rajputana Gazeteer, an hereditary, non-resumableand inalienable property in soil was inseparably bound up with a revenue-free title. Bhoom was given as a compensation for bloodshedin order to quell a feud, for distinguished services in the field, for protection of a border or for the watch and ward of the village. The meaning of the designation Bhumihar being as stated above, the Bhumihar Brahmans are evidently these Brahmans who held grants of land for secular service. Whoever held a secular fief was Bhumihar. Where a Brahman held such a tenure, he was called a Bhumihar Brahman....Bhumihar Brahmans are sometimes called simply Bhumihars..." The Bhimihars are Brahmins who are also great fighters and warlike.
In 1889, Pradhan Bhumihar Brahman Sabha was established at Patna "to improve moral, social and educational reforms of the community."[43] The social reformation among Bhumihar Brahmins had two streams — one led by Sir Ganesh Dutt, and the other by Swami Sahajanand Saraswati.[40] Bhumihars were officially recognized as Brahmins by the government of British India in 1911 census (second all India census report) of British India.[44]
Harry W. Blair notes that the Bhumihars were
a high-caste community which has at least since the beginning of the 19th century claimed that it was in fact and should be regarded as a Brahman caste. In the early years of the [20th] century the Bhumihars organized a caste association, the Bhumihar Brahman Sabha, to press this claim, in particular with the census authorities. The census officials felt themselves besieged by these efforts and tried, valiantly in their own estimation, to thwart them, but not always successfully.
[45]
Blair's conclusion from analysis of census data in the Bihar area for 1901-1931 is that Bhumihars had begun to pass themselves off to census enumerators as being Brahman, evidenced by a fall in the number of Bhumihars recorded occurring at the same time as there was a substantial rise in the number of Brahmins. In some areas the change was "quite spectacular". He also notes that of all the various caste associations in this area it was only that of the Bhumihars which had organised with the intent of achieving "the promotion of its members to a different higher caste,"[45]
Swami Sahajanand Saraswati, a Bhumihar himself, wrote extensively on Brahmin society and on the origin of Bhumihars. He stated that the Bhumihars are among the superior Brahmins.[46] Some Bhumihar Brahmins are also known for their secular and unorthodox practices, where some of them are also descendants of Husseini Brahminss.[18] On the social scale, although the Bhumihars are known to be Brahmins, on account of the fact that they were cultivators they were not given the ritual status of Brahmins.[47]
Siyaram Tiwary, the former dean at Visva Bharati University, stated that the Bhumihars are "landed Brahmins who stopped taking alms and performing pujas and rituals", comparing them with Tyagis of Western UP, Zamindar Bengali Brahmins, Niyogi Brahmins of Andhra Pradesh, Nambudiri Brahmin of Kerala, Chitpavans of Maharashtra, Anavil Desais of Gujarat and Mohyals of Punjab.[48] Bhumihars are classified in the Brahmin varna in Hinduism and hence use the designation Bhumihar Brahmin,[10] but some other communities dispute this claim.[49][11]
Acharya Tarineesh Jha, himself a Maithil Brahmin scholar has attested how from ancient times to modern all great Brahmin scholars like Maithili Manishi Mahamahopadhyay Chitradhar Mishra, Mahamahopadhyay Balkrishna Mishra; Saryupareen Brahmin scholars Mahamahopadhyay Dwivedi, Mahamahopadhyay Shivkumar Shastri, Dr. Hazari Prasad Dwivedi; Kanyakubja Brahmins scholars Mahavir Prasad Dwivedi, Pandit Laxminarayan Dixit Shastri, Pandit Venkatesh Narayan Tiwari and others have mentioned about Bhumihar Brahmins as their fellow Brahmin brothers.[50]
They are also called Ajachak Brahmans, i.e., Brahmans who do not take alms (jachak) in contrast to the ordinary Brahmans who are Jachaks or almstakers[51] but there are still some who traditionally take alms as in Gaya and Hazaribagh.[52] Like fellow Brahmans, they did not use to hold the plough, but employed labourers for the purpose.[51]
The census returns give no less than four hundred and fifty-eight sections: but here the territorial sections and the Brahminical gotras are mixed up together.[41] The most important local sections are the Chaudhari, Gautama, and Kolaha in Banaras; the Gautama in Mirzapur; the Bharadwaj, Bhriguvanshi, Dikshit, Donwar, Gautama, Kaushik, Kinwar, Kistwar, Sakarwar, Sonwar in Ghazipur; Bhagata, Kinwar, Benwar, of Ballia; the Baghochhiya, Baksaria, Gautama, Kaushik and Sakarwar(Sankritya) of Gorakhpur; the Barasi, Birhariya and Kaushik of Basti; and the Barwar, Bharadwaj, Bhriguvansh, Denwar, Gargbans, Gautama, Purvar, Sakarwar, and Shandilya of Azamgarh.[41] On the Jijhoutia clan of Bhumihar Brahmins, William Crooke writes, "A branch of the Kanaujia Brahmins (Kanyakubja Brahmins) who take their name from the country of Jajakshuku, which is mentioned in the Madanpur inscription."[41]
The Bhumihar Brahmins follow in every respect the standard Brahminical rules.[41] They are usually Shaivas and Shaktas.[41] There are also Vaishnavas, following the Tatvavada school of Madhavacharya.[53] Bhumihar Brahmins, like all other Brahmins are endogamous, but marital relations are known to exist since ancient times between Bhumihar Brahmins and Maithil Brahmins in Tirhut and Mithila and between Bhumihar Brahmins and Kanyakubja Brahmins in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh where Jihoutia clan of Bhumihar Brahmins live.[52] Bhumihar Brahmin men of Purnea took to Maithil Brahmin wives in Purnea and married their daughters to Bhumihar Brahmin/Babhan men.[54][55]
Bhumihars are considered a politically volatile community.[56][57] Bhumihar Brahmins in Champaran had revolted against indigo cultivation in 1914 (at Pipra) and 1916 (Turkaulia) and Pandit Raj Kumar Shukla took Mahatma Gandhi to Champaran and the Champaran Satyagraha began.[58]
Although the Bhumihars have always constituted a very small proportion of the Bihar population (around 2.8%), they wielded political strength in pre-Mandal politics of Bihar. With the partition of Bihar, their percentage has shot up to 6 percent and all political parties are vying for their votes.[48]
Bhumihars, have been involved in many caste-related conflicts.[59][60][61] However, it was in reply to the requests made by Yadav peasants in 1927, Swami Sahajanand Saraswati had started the Bihar Provincial Kisan Sabha, which led to the largest peasant movement in the country.[62] Bhumihars also gave Bihar its first chief minister in Sri Krishna Sinha who had himself led Dalit's entry into Baidyanath Dham (Vaidyanath Temple, Deoghar).[48]
Following independence, Naxalite groups began to originate in Bihar in response to low wages and alleged illtreatment of Dalit peasants by upper-caste landlords.[63] Some Bhumihars and other upper-caste landlords responded by starting private militias called Senas.[63] These were heavily funded and promoted by some Bhumihar landlords to fight extremist Naxalite groups which supposedly represented low-caste Bihari peasants.[63] Hostilities began to intensify when in 1994, the Ranvir Sena was founded in Ekwari village to counter Naxal terrorism.[63] Since its formation, the Ranvir Sena has been held responsible for murder, rape and burglary in Bihar.[63] This outfit, along with the Maoist Communist Centre, has been responsible for large-scale violence in Bihar.[63] Incidents of violence have been reported from the villages of Belaur, Bara, Senari, Ekwari, Chandi, Nanaur, Narhi, Sarathau, Haibaspur, Laxmanpur-Bathe, Shankarbigha, and Narayanpur.[63]
Now this situation,Bhumihars belong to critical situation because Land have not more much and reservation is not available.this situation lots of Bhumihars belong to poor sistuation. Bhumihars along with other Brahmins and Rajputs, in some places,[64] were also involved in anti-Muslim communal violence during the Partition of India.[64] and during the 1893 Anti-Muslim riots.[65]
- ^ a b c d Saraswata, Swami Sahajanand (2003). Swami Sahajanand Saraswati Rachnawali in Six volumes (in Volume 1). Delhi: Prakashan Sansthan. pp. 519 (Volume 1). ISBN 81-7714-097-3.
- ^ a b Hunter, William Wilson (1877). A statistical account of Bengal. Trübner & co..
- ^ a b Sharma, R.S. (2009). Rethinking India's Past. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-569787-2.
- ^ a b Ram, Bindeshwar (1998). Land and society in India: agrarian relations in colonial North Bihar. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-81-250-0643-5.
- ^ [1]
- ^ [2]
- ^ [3]
- ^ a b c Sherring, M.A. (First ed 1872, new ed 2008). Hindu Tribes and Castes as Reproduced in Benaras. 6A, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049, India: Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-2036-0.
- ^ a b Jogendra Nath, Bhattacharya (1995). Hindu Castes and Sects. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. pp. 512 (at p 129). ISBN 81-215-0700-6.
- ^ a b Sinha, Gopal Sharan; Ramesh Chandra Sinha (September 1967). "Exploration in Caste Stereotypes". Social Forces (University of North Carolina Press) 46 (1): 42–47. DOI:10.2307/2575319. ISSN 0037-7732. JSTOR 2575319.
- ^ a b Martin, Robert Montgomery (1838). The History, Antiquities, Topography, and Statistics of Eastern India. London: W. H. Allen and Co.. pp. 453. ISBN 1-146-51280-5. OCLC 6957973.
- ^ Das, Pg 82
- ^ Das, Pg 83
- ^ Bhadra, Gautam (2008). Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society (contributors: Ranajit Guha, Shahid Amin, Partha Chatterjee, Gyan Prakash, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Sudipta Kaviraj, David Hardiman, David Arnold, Gyan Pandey, Gautam Bhadra, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Edward Said, Sumit Sarkar and others). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-565125-6.
- ^ Alavi, Seema (2007). The Eighteenth Century in India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-569201-3.
- ^ Robb, Peter (2006). Empire, Identity, and India: Peasants, Political Economy, and Law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-568160-4.
- ^ Saraswati, Swami Sahajanand (2003). Swami Sahajanand Saraswati Rachnawali in Six volumes (in Volume 1). Delhi: Prakashan Sansthan. pp. 519 (at p 68–69) (Volume 1). ISBN 81-7714-097-3.
- ^ a b Ahmad, Faizan (2008-01-21). "Hindus participate in Muharram". The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Hindus_take_part_in_Muharram_in_Patna/articleshow/2716459.cms. Retrieved 2008-04-05.
- ^ Thapan (ed.), Meenakshi (2005). Transnational Migration and the Politics of Identity. SAGE. p. 320. ISBN 978-0-7619-3425-7.
- ^ Diwakar, Ranganath Ramachandra (1959). Bihar through the ages. Orient Longman.
- ^ a b c Reports by Archaeological Survey of India. Archaeological Survey of India. 1882. ISBN 1-4460-2055-X.
- ^ Gupta, N. L. (1975). Transition from capitalism to socialism, and other essays. Kalamkar Prakashan. ASIN B0000E7XZP.
- ^ a b Guha, Ranajit (2000 (2nd edition)). A Subaltern studies reader, 1986-1995. South Asia Books. ISBN 978-0-19-565230-7.
- ^ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Baptist Mission Press. 1832. ASIN B0000CRS3D. ISBN 963-05-3822-9.
- ^ Risley, Herbert Hope (1891). The tribes and castes of Bengal. Printed at the Bengal Secretariat Press. ASIN B00087AEQA.
- ^ Maitra, R.K. (1959). Indian studies: past & present. ASIN B0000CRX5I.
- ^ a b c d e Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya (1896). Hindu Castes and Sects: AN Exposition of the Origin of the Hindu Caste System. pp. 109.
- ^ Crooke, William (1999). The Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh. 6A, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049, India: Asian Educational Services. pp. 1809 (at page 64). ISBN 81-206-1210-8.
- ^ Crooke, William (1999). The Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh. 6A, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049, India: Asian Educational Services. pp. 1809 (at page 64). ISBN 81-206-1210-8.
- ^ Sinha, Sushil Kumar (2005). The Bhumihars: Caste of Eastern India. 4855/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, India: Raj Publications. pp. 200(at page 30). ISBN 81-86208-37-2.
- ^ Sinha, Sushil Kumar (2005). The Bhumihars: Caste of Eastern India. 4855/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, India: Raj Publications. pp. 200(at page 30). ISBN 81-86208-37-2.
- ^ Sinha, Sushil Kumar (2005). The Bhumihars: Caste of Eastern India. 4855/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, India: Raj Publications. pp. 200(at page 30). ISBN 81-86208-37-2.
- ^ Sinha, Sushil Kumar (2005). The Bhumihars: Caste of Eastern India. 4855/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, India: Raj Publications. pp. 200(at page 30). ISBN 81-86208-37-2.
- ^ Sinha, Sushil Kumar (2005). The Bhumihars: Caste of Eastern India. 4855/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002, India: Raj Publications. pp. 200(at page 30). ISBN 81-86208-37-2.
- ^ a b Yang, Anand A. (1999). Bazaar India: Markets, Society, and the Colonial State in Bihar. University of California Press. p. 139. ISBN 978-0-520-21100-1.
- ^ Bayly, C.A. (1988). Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion, 1770-1870. Cambridge University Press. pp. 504 (at p 18). ISBN 978-0-521-31054-3.
- ^ Bayly, Susan (2001). Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age. Cambridge University Press. p. 440 (at p 203). ISBN 978-0-521-79842-6.
- ^ a b R. G. Tiedemann, Robert A. Bickers (2007). The Boxers, China, and the World. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 231 (at p 63). ISBN 978-0-7425-5395-8.
- ^ a b Nicholas, Ralph W. (2003). Fruits of worship: practical religion in Bengal. Orient Blackswan. pp. 248 (at p 35). ISBN 978-81-8028-006-1.
- ^ a b Pranava K Chaudhary (2003-03-03). "Rishis, Maharshis, Brahmarshis...". The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/39109373.cms. Retrieved 2008-03-25.
- ^ a b c d e f Crooke, William (1999). The Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh. 4. 6A, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049, India: Asian Educational Services. ISBN 81-206-1210-8.
- ^ a b c S. N. Sadasivan (2000). A Social History of India. APH Publishing. pp. 238. ISBN 978-81-7648-170-0. http://books.google.com/?id=Be3PCvzf-BYC&pg=PA238&lpg=PA238&dq=bhumihar+jogendra+bhattacharya.
- ^ ed. by V. S. Upadhyay ... (1995). Contemporary Indian Society: Essays in Honour of Professor Sachchidananda. Anmol Publications Pvt. Ltd.. ISBN 978-81-7041-613-5.
- ^ Blunt, E.A.H. (1969) [1931]. The Caste System of North India. S. Chand Publishers.
- ^ a b Blair, Harry W. (1981). "Caste and the British Census in Bihar: Using Old Data to Study Contemporary Political Behavior". In Barrier, Norman Gerald. The Census in British India: New Perspectives. New Delhi: Manohar. pp. 157–158. http://books.google.com/books?id=EzeaAAAAIAAJ. Retrieved 2011-08-28.
- ^ Saraswati, Swami Sahajanand (2003). Swami Sahajanand Saraswati Rachnawali in Six volumes(Brahmarshi Vansha Vistar in Volume 1). Delhi: Prakashan Sansthan. pp. 153–519 (Volume 1). ISBN 81-7714-097-3.
- ^ Das, A.N. (September 1, 1982). Agrarian Movements in India: Studies on 20th Century Bihar. Routledge. pp. 152 (at p 51). ISBN 978-0-7146-3216-2.
- ^ a b c Arun Kumar (2005-01-25). "Bhumihars rooted to the ground in caste politics". The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Patna/Bhumihars_rooted_to_the_ground_in_caste_politics/articleshow/msid-1001601,curpg-2.cms. Retrieved 2008-04-05.
- ^ Bhattacharya, Jogendra Nath (1968) [1869]. Hindu Castes and Sects: An Exposition of the Origin of the Hindu Caste. Calcutta: Editions Indian. pp. 87. OCLC 115388.
- ^ Saraswati, Swami Sahajanand (2003). Swami Sahajanand Saraswati Rachnawali in Six volumes(Brahmarshi Vansha Vistar in Volume 1). Delhi: Prakashan Sansthan. pp. 153–519 at pg. 515–19(Volume 1) Parishisht by Acharya Tarineesh Jha. ISBN 81-7714-097-3.
- ^ a b O'malley, L.S.S. (2007). Bengal District Gazetteer: Gaya. Concept Publishing Company. pp. 504 (at p 18). ISBN 978-81-7268-137-1.
- ^ a b Saraswati, Swami Sahajanand (2003). Swami Sahajanand Saraswati Rachnawali in Six volumes(Brahmarshi Vansha Vistar in Volume 1). Delhi: Prakashan Sansthan. pp. 153–519. ISBN 81-7714-097-3.
- ^ Chatterjee, Gautam (2003). Sacred Hindu Symbols. Abhinav Publications. ISBN 978-81-7017-397-7.
- ^ Administration, District (1915). Purnea District Gazetteer, B Volume: Statistics, 1900-1901 to 1910-1911. Pūrnia (British India: District).
- ^ Roy Choudhury, Pranab Chandra (1965). Bihar District Gazetteers. Printed by the Superintendent, Secretariat Press, Bihar.
- ^ Abhay Singh (2004-07-06). "BJP, Cong eye Bhumihars as Rabri drops ministers". The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/767453.cms. Retrieved 2008-03-21.
- ^ These days, their poster boys are goons. Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. 16 March 2004
- ^ Brown, Judith Margaret (1972). Gandhi's Rise to Power, Indian Politics 1915-1922: Indian Politics 1915-1922. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press Archive. pp. 384. ISBN 978-0-521-09873-1.
- ^ Qyanjhari Journal; India's Worst Case: The War Between the Castes
- ^ Where life is an interlude between two massacres.
- ^ How Yadavs captured the heart of Lalooland
- ^ Walter Huaser (1996-05-21). "Peasant Surprise". The Telegraph (Calcutta), 21 May 1996, p. 8. http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/Misc/Sss/whpsnts96.html. Retrieved 2008-04-01.
- ^ a b c d e f g "The pattern of abuse: Rural violence in Bihar and state's response". Human Rights Watch. http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1999/india/India994-06.htm.
- ^ a b N. L. Gupta (2000). Communal riots in India. Gyan Pub. House. pp. 264. ISBN 81-212-0644-8, ISBN 978-81-212-0644-0.
- ^ [4]
- Swami Sahajanand Saraswati Rachnawali (Selected works of Swami Sahajanand Saraswati), Prakashan Sansthan, Delhi, 2003.
- Baldev Upadhyaya, Kashi Ki Panditya Parampara, Sharda Sansthan, Varanasi, 1985.
- Translation by G. Bühler (1886). Sacred Books of the East: The Laws of Manus (Vol. XXV). Oxford. Available online as The Laws of Manu
- Kautilya Arthashastra, R. P. Kangle, tr. 3 vols. Laurier Books, Motilal Banarsidass, New Delhi (1997) ISBN 81-208-0042-7.
- M.A. Sherring, Hindu Tribes and Castes as Reproduced in Benaras, Asian Educational Services, New Delhi, First edition 1872, new edition 2008.
- Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya, Hindu Castes and Sects, Munshiram Manoharlal, Delhi, first edition 1896, new edition 1995.
- E.A.H.Blunt, The Caste System of North India, first edition in 1931 by Oxford University Press, new edition by S. Chand Publishers, 1969.
- Pandurang Vaman Kane, History of Dharmasastra, Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
- Christopher Alan Bayly, Rulers, Townsmen, and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion, 1770–1870, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
- Anand A. Yang, Bazaar India: Markets, Society, and the Colonial State in Bihar, University of California Press, 1999.
- Acharya Hazari Prasad Dwivedi Rachnawali, Rajkamal Prakashan, Delhi.
- Bibha Jha's Ph.D thesis Bhumihar Brahmins: A Sociological Study submitted to the Patna University.
- Arvind Narayan Das, Agrarian movements in India: studies on 20th century Bihar (Library of Peasant Studies), Routledge, London, 1982.
- M. N. Srinivas, Social Change in Modern India, Orient Longman, Delhi, 1995.
- Mahavir Prasad Dwivedi essays.
