A transformer is a device that transfers electrical energy from one circuit to another through inductively coupled conductors—the transformer's coils. A varying current in the first or primary winding creates a varying magnetic flux in the transformer's core and thus a varying magnetic field through the secondary winding. This varying magnetic field induces a varying electromotive force (EMF), or "voltage", in the secondary winding. This effect is called inductive coupling.
If a load is connected to the secondary, current will flow in the secondary winding, and electrical energy will be transferred from the primary circuit through the transformer to the load. In an ideal transformer, the induced voltage in the secondary winding (Vs) is in proportion to the primary voltage (Vp) and is given by the ratio of the number of turns in the secondary (Ns) to the number of turns in the primary (Np) as follows:
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{V_\text{s}}{V_{\text{p}}} = \frac{N_\text{s}}{N_\text{p}}
By appropriate selection of the ratio of turns, a transformer thus enables an alternating current (AC) voltage to be "stepped up" by making Ns greater than Np, or "stepped down" by making Ns less than Np. The windings are coils wound around a ferromagnetic core, air-core transformers being a notable exception.
Transformers range in size from a thumbnail-sized coupling transformer hidden inside a stage microphone to huge units weighing hundreds of tons used to interconnect portions of power grids. All operate on the same basic principles, although the range of designs is wide. While new technologies have eliminated the need for transformers in some electronic circuits, transformers are still found in nearly all electronic devices designed for household ("mains") voltage. Transformers are essential for high-voltage electric power transmission, which makes long-distance transmission economically practical.
Faraday's experiment with induction between coils of wire
[1]
The principle behind the operation of a transformer, electromagnetic induction, was discovered independently by Michael Faraday and Joseph Henry in 1831. However, Faraday was the first to publish the results of his experiments and thus receive credit for the discovery.[2] The relationship between electromotive force (EMF) or "voltage" and magnetic flux was formalized in an equation now referred to as "Faraday's law of induction":
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): |\mathcal{E}| = \left|{{d\Phi_B} \over dt}\right|
.
where Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): |\mathcal{E}|
is the magnitude of the EMF in volts and ΦB is the magnetic flux through the circuit in webers.[3]
Faraday performed the first experiments on induction between coils of wire, including winding a pair of coils around an iron ring, thus creating the first toroidal closed-core transformer.[4] However he only applied individual pulses of current to his transformer, and never discovered the relation between the turns ratio and EMF in the windings.
Faraday's ring transformer
The first type of transformer to see wide use was the induction coil, invented by Rev. Nicholas Callan of Maynooth College, Ireland in 1836. He was one of the first researchers to realize that the more turns the secondary winding has in relation to the primary winding, the larger is the increase in EMF. Induction coils evolved from scientists' and inventors' efforts to get higher voltages from batteries. Since batteries produce direct current (DC) rather than alternating current (AC), induction coils relied upon vibrating electrical contacts that regularly interrupted the current in the primary to create the flux changes necessary for induction. Between the 1830s and the 1870s, efforts to build better induction coils, mostly by trial and error, slowly revealed the basic principles of transformers.
Before the transformer was developed, long-distance direct-current electric power distribution required the use of spinning motor-generator systems to step a high transmission voltage down to utility voltage for lighting.
[5] G = power plant generator, M/D = motor-generator at customer's location, L = lights
Before the development of the transformer, electric power distribution primarily used direct current. It was difficult for a DC utility-power generation station to be more than a few kilometers from the user, because up until about 1897, light bulbs could only be effectively designed to operate at up to 110 volts maximum,[6], and up to 220 volts by 1917.[7]. It is expensive to send energy long distances at utility voltage (100-250 volts) due to the very high amperage of many customers, and the need for very thick transmission wires capable of handling the current.
It was understood that high voltages allowed long distance transmission with low amperage (250 volts at 5000 amps = 25000 volts at 50 amps) so the transmission wires can be smaller and less expensive, but it still needed to be stepped back down to utility voltage at the customer's location. At the time the only way to efficiently convert DC from one voltage to another was with a spinning motor-generator device, and this would be needed at each customer site. Each motor-generator has brushes constantly rubbing on a commutator, and axle bearings that need lubrication. The brushes wear out and need to be periodically replaced, and the commutator wears down and needs to be resurfaced, then the whole machine is rebuilt when the commutator wears too thin.
By the 1870s, efficient generators that produced alternating current (alternators) were available, and it was found that alternating current could power an induction coil directly, without an interrupter. In 1876, Russian engineer Pavel Yablochkov invented a lighting system based on a set of induction coils where the primary windings were connected to a source of alternating current and the secondary windings could be connected to several "electric candles" (arc lamps) of his own design. [8] [9] The coils Yablochkov employed functioned essentially as transformers.[8]
In 1878, the Ganz Company in Hungary began manufacturing equipment for electric lighting and, by 1883, had installed over fifty systems in Austria-Hungary. Their systems used alternating current exclusively and included those comprising both arc and incandescent lamps, along with generators and other equipment.[10]
Lucien Gaulard and John Dixon Gibbs first exhibited a device with an open iron core called a "secondary generator" in London in 1882, then sold the idea to the Westinghouse company in the United States.[11] They also exhibited the invention in Turin, Italy in 1884, where it was adopted for an electric lighting system.[12] However, the efficiency of their open-core bipolar apparatus remained very low.[12]
Induction coils with open magnetic circuits are inefficient for transfer of power to loads. Until about 1880, the paradigm for AC power transmission from a high voltage supply to a low voltage load was a series circuit. Open-core transformers with a ratio near 1:1 were connected with their primaries in series to allow use of a high voltage for transmission while presenting a low voltage to the lamps. The inherent flaw in this method was that turning off a single lamp affected the voltage supplied to all others on the same circuit. Many adjustable transformer designs were introduced to compensate for this problematic characteristic of the series circuit, including those employing methods of adjusting the core or bypassing the magnetic flux around part of a coil.[12] Efficient, practical transformer designs did not appear until the 1880s, but within a decade, the transformer would be instrumental in the "War of Currents", and in seeing AC distribution systems triumph over their DC counterparts, a position in which they have remained dominant ever since.[13]
Shell-form transformer. Sketch used by Uppenborn to describe Z.B.D. engineers' 1885 patents and earliest articles.
[12]
Core-form, front; shell-form, back. Earliest specimens of Z.B.D.-designed high-efficiency constant-potential transformers manufactured at the
Ganz factory in 1885.
Stanley's 1886 design for adjustable gap open-core induction coils
[14]
In the autumn of 1884, Károly Zipernowsky, Ottó Bláthy and Miksa Déri (Z.B.D.), three engineers associated with the Ganz factory, had determined that open-core devices were impracticable, as they were incapable of reliably regulating voltage.[15] In their joint 1885 patent applications for novel transformers (later called Z.B.D. transformers), they described two designs with closed magnetic circuits where copper windings were either a) wound around iron wire ring core or b) surrounded by iron wire core.[12] The two designs were the first application of the two basic transformer construction types in common use to this day which can as a class all be termed as either core-form or shell-form (or alternatively, core-type or shell-type), as in a) or b), respectively (see images).[16][17][18][19] The Ganz factory had also in the autumn of 1884 made delivery of the world's first five high-efficiency AC transformers, the first of these units having been shipped on September 16, 1884.[20] This first unit had been manufactured to the following specifications: 1,400 W, 40 Hz, 120:72 V, 11.6:19.4 A, ratio 1.67:1, one-phase, shell-form.[20] In both designs, the magnetic flux linking the primary and secondary windings traveled almost entirely within the confines of the iron core, with no intentional path through air (see 'Toroidal cores' below). The new transformers were 3.4 times more efficient than the open core bipolar devices of Gaulard and Gibbs.[21] Their patents included two other major interrelated innovations: one concerning the use of parallel connected, instead of series connected, utilization loads, the other concerning the ability to have high turns ratio transformers such that the supply network voltage could be much higher (initially 1,400 to 2,000 V) than the voltage of utilization loads (100 V initially preferred). [22][23] When they employed them in parallel connected electric distribution systems, closed-core transformers finally made it technically and economically feasible to provide electric power for lighting in homes, businesses and public spaces.[24][25] Bláthy had suggested the use of closed-cores, Zipernowsky the use of parallel shunt connections, and Déri had performed the experiments;[26] Transformers in use today are designed based on principles discovered by the three engineers. They also popularized the word "transformer" to describe a device for altering the EMF of an electric current,[24][27] although the term had already been in use by 1882.[28][29] In 1886, the Z.B.D. engineers designed, and the Ganz factory supplied electrical equipment for, the world's first power station that used AC generators to power a parallel-connected common electrical network, the steam-powered Rome-Cerchi power plant.[30]
Although George Westinghouse had bought Gaulard and Gibbs' patents in 1885, the Edison Electric Light Company held an option on the U.S. rights for the Z.B.D. transformers, requiring Westinghouse to pursue alternative designs on the same principles. He assigned to William Stanley the task of developing a device for commercial use in United States.[31] Stanley's first patented design was for induction coils with single cores of soft iron and adjustable gaps to regulate the EMF present in the secondary winding (see image).[14] This design[32] was first used commercially in the U.S. in 1886[13] but Westinghouse was intent on improving the Stanley design to make it (unlike the Z.B.D. type) easy and cheap to produce.[32] Westinghouse, Stanley and a few other associates had soon developed a core consisting of a stack of thin "E‑shaped" iron plates, separated individually or in pairs by thin sheets of paper or other insulating material. Prewound copper coils could then be slid into place, and straight iron plates laid in to create a closed magnetic circuit. Westinghouse applied for a patent for the new design in December 1886; it was granted in July 1887.[26][33]
In 1889, Russian-born engineer Mikhail Dolivo-Dobrovolsky developed the first three-phase transformer at the Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft ("General Electricity Company") in Germany.[34]
In 1891, Nikola Tesla invented the Tesla coil, an air-cored, dual-tuned resonant transformer for generating very high voltages at high frequency.[35] [36]
Audio frequency transformers ("repeating coils") were used by early experimenters in the development of the telephone.[citation needed]
An ideal transformer. The secondary current arises from the action of the secondary EMF on the (not shown) load impedance.
The transformer is based on two principles: first, that an electric current can produce a magnetic field (electromagnetism) and second that a changing magnetic field within a coil of wire induces a voltage across the ends of the coil (electromagnetic induction). Changing the current in the primary coil changes the magnetic flux that is developed. The changing magnetic flux induces a voltage in the secondary coil.
An ideal transformer is shown in the adjacent figure. Current passing through the primary coil creates a magnetic field. The primary and secondary coils are wrapped around a core of very high magnetic permeability, such as iron, so that most of the magnetic flux passes through both the primary and secondary coils. If a load is connected to the secondary winding, the load current and voltage will be in the directions indicated, given the primary current and voltage in the directions indicated (each will be alternating current in practice).
The voltage induced across the secondary coil may be calculated from Faraday's law of induction, which states that:
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): V_\text{s} = N_\text{s} \frac{\mathrm{d}\Phi}{\mathrm{d}t},
where Vs is the instantaneous voltage, Ns is the number of turns in the secondary coil and Φ is the magnetic flux through one turn of the coil. If the turns of the coil are oriented perpendicularly to the magnetic field lines, the flux is the product of the magnetic flux density B and the area A through which it cuts. The area is constant, being equal to the cross-sectional area of the transformer core, whereas the magnetic field varies with time according to the excitation of the primary. Since the same magnetic flux passes through both the primary and secondary coils in an ideal transformer,[37] the instantaneous voltage across the primary winding equals
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): V_\text{p} = N_\text{p} \frac{\mathrm{d}\Phi}{\mathrm{d}t}.
Taking the ratio of the two equations for Vs and Vp gives the basic equation[38] for stepping up or stepping down the voltage
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{V_\text{s}}{V_\text{p}} = \frac{N_\text{s}}{N_\text{p}}.
Np/Ns is known as the turns ratio, and is the primary functional characteristic of any transformer. In the case of step-up transformers, this may sometimes be stated as the reciprocal, Ns/Np. Turns ratio is commonly expressed as an irreducible fraction or ratio: for example, a transformer with primary and secondary windings of, respectively, 100 and 150 turns is said to have a turns ratio of 2:3 rather than 0.667 or 100:150.
The ideal transformer as a circuit element
If the secondary coil is attached to a load that allows current to flow, electrical power is transmitted from the primary circuit to the secondary circuit. Ideally, the transformer is perfectly efficient. All the incoming energy is transformed from the primary circuit to the magnetic field and into the secondary circuit. If this condition is met, the input electric power must equal the output power:
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): P_\text{incoming} = I_\text{p} V_\text{p} = P_\text{outgoing} = I_\text{s} V_\text{s},\!
giving the ideal transformer equation
- Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{V_\text{s}}{V_\text{p}} = \frac{N_\text{s}}{N_\text{p}} = \frac{I_\text{p}}{I_\text{s}}.
This formula is a reasonable approximation for most commercial built transformers today.
If the voltage is increased, then the current is decreased by the same factor. The impedance in one circuit is transformed by the square of the turns ratio.[37] For example, if an impedance Zs is attached across the terminals of the secondary coil, it appears to the primary circuit to have an impedance of (Np/Ns)2Zs. This relationship is reciprocal, so that the impedance Zp of the primary circuit appears to the secondary to be (Ns/Np)2Zp.
The simplified description above neglects several practical factors, in particular, the primary current required to establish a magnetic field in the core, and the contribution to the field due to current in the secondary circuit.
Models of an ideal transformer typically assume a core of negligible reluctance with two windings of zero resistance.[39] When a voltage is applied to the primary winding, a small current flows, driving flux around the magnetic circuit of the core.:[39] The current required to create the flux is termed the magnetizing current. Since the ideal core has been assumed to have near-zero reluctance, the magnetizing current is negligible, although still required, to create the magnetic field.
The changing magnetic field induces an electromotive force (EMF) across each winding.[40] Since the ideal windings have no impedance, they have no associated voltage drop, and so the voltages VP and VS measured at the terminals of the transformer, are equal to the corresponding EMFs. The primary EMF, acting as it does in opposition to the primary voltage, is sometimes termed the "back EMF".[41] This is in accordance with Lenz's law, which states that induction of EMF always opposes development of any such change in magnetic field.
Leakage flux of a transformer
The ideal transformer model assumes that all flux generated by the primary winding links all the turns of every winding, including itself. In practice, some flux traverses paths that take it outside the windings.[42] Such flux is termed leakage flux, and results in leakage inductance in series with the mutually coupled transformer windings.[41] Leakage results in energy being alternately stored in and discharged from the magnetic fields with each cycle of the power supply. It is not directly a power loss (see "Stray losses" below), but results in inferior voltage regulation, causing the secondary voltage to not be directly proportional to the primary voltage, particularly under heavy load.[42] Transformers are therefore normally designed to have very low leakage inductance. Nevertheless, it is impossible to eliminate all leakage flux because it plays an essential part in the operation of the transformer. The combined effect of the leakage flux and the electric field around the windings is what transfers energy from the primary to the secondary.[43]
In some applications increased leakage is desired, and long magnetic paths, air gaps, or magnetic bypass shunts may deliberately be introduced in a transformer design to limit the short-circuit current it will supply.[41] Leaky transformers may be used to supply loads that exhibit negative resistance, such as electric arcs, mercury vapor lamps, and neon signs or for safely handling loads that become periodically short-circuited such as electric arc welders.[44]
Air gaps are also used to keep a transformer from saturating, especially audio-frequency transformers in circuits that have a direct current component flowing through the windings.[45]
Leakage inductance is also helpful when transformers are operated in parallel. It can be shown that if the "per-unit" inductance of two transformers is the same (a typical value is 5%), they will automatically split power "correctly" (e.g. 500 kVA unit in parallel with 1,000 kVA unit, the larger one will carry twice the current).[citation needed]
Transformer universal EMF equation
If the flux in the core is purely sinusoidal, the relationship for either winding between its rms voltage Erms of the winding, and the supply frequency f, number of turns N, core cross-sectional area a and peak magnetic flux density B is given by the universal EMF equation:[39]
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): E_\text{rms} = {\frac {2 \pi f N a B_\text{peak}} {\sqrt{2}}} \! \approx 4.44 f N a B
If the flux does not contain even harmonics the following equation can be used for half-cycle average voltage Eavg of any waveshape:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): E_\text{avg}= 4 f N a B_\text{peak} \!
The time-derivative term in Faraday's Law shows that the flux in the core is the integral with respect to time of the applied voltage.[46] Hypothetically an ideal transformer would work with direct-current excitation, with the core flux increasing linearly with time.[47] In practice, the flux rises to the point where magnetic saturation of the core occurs, causing a large increase in the magnetizing current and overheating the transformer. All practical transformers must therefore operate with alternating (or pulsed direct) current.[47]
The EMF of a transformer at a given flux density increases with frequency.[39] By operating at higher frequencies, transformers can be physically more compact because a given core is able to transfer more power without reaching saturation and fewer turns are needed to achieve the same impedance. However, properties such as core loss and conductor skin effect also increase with frequency. Aircraft and military equipment employ 400 Hz power supplies which reduce core and winding weight.[48] Conversely, frequencies used for some railway electrification systems were much lower (e.g. 16.7 Hz and 25 Hz) than normal utility frequencies (50 – 60 Hz) for historical reasons concerned mainly with the limitations of early electric traction motors. As such, the transformers used to step down the high over-head line voltages (e.g. 15 kV) were much heavier for the same power rating than those designed only for the higher frequencies.
Operation of a transformer at its designed voltage but at a higher frequency than intended will lead to reduced magnetizing current. At a lower frequency, the magnetizing current will increase. Operation of a transformer at other than its design frequency may require assessment of voltages, losses, and cooling to establish if safe operation is practical. For example, transformers may need to be equipped with "volts per hertz" over-excitation relays to protect the transformer from overvoltage at higher than rated frequency.
One example of state-of-the-art design is transformers used for electric multiple unit high speed trains, particularly those required to operate across the borders of countries using different electrical standards. The position of such transformers is restricted to being hung below the passenger compartment. They have to function at different frequencies (down to 16.7 Hz) and voltages (up to 25 kV) whilst handling the enhanced power requirements needed for operating the trains at high speed.
Knowledge of natural frequencies of transformer windings is necessary for the determination of winding transient response and switching surge voltages.
An ideal transformer would have no energy losses, and would be 100% efficient. In practical transformers, energy is dissipated in the windings, core, and surrounding structures. Larger transformers are generally more efficient, and those rated for electricity distribution usually perform better than 98%.[49]
Experimental transformers using superconducting windings achieve efficiencies of 99.85%.[50] The increase in efficiency can save considerable energy, and hence money, in a large heavily loaded transformer; the trade-off is in the additional initial and running cost of the superconducting design.
Losses in transformers (excluding associated circuitry) vary with load current, and may be expressed as "no-load" or "full-load" loss. Winding resistance dominates load losses, whereas hysteresis and eddy currents losses contribute to over 99% of the no-load loss. The no-load loss can be significant, so that even an idle transformer constitutes a drain on the electrical supply and a running cost. Designing transformers for lower loss requires a larger core, good-quality silicon steel, or even amorphous steel for the core and thicker wire, increasing initial cost so that there is a trade-off between initial cost and running cost (also see energy efficient transformer).[51]
Transformer losses are divided into losses in the windings, termed copper loss, and those in the magnetic circuit, termed iron loss. Losses in the transformer arise from:
- Winding resistance
- Current flowing through the windings causes resistive heating of the conductors. At higher frequencies, skin effect and proximity effect create additional winding resistance and losses.
- Hysteresis losses
- Each time the magnetic field is reversed, a small amount of energy is lost due to hysteresis within the core. For a given core material, the loss is proportional to the frequency, and is a function of the peak flux density to which it is subjected.[52]
- Eddy currents
- Ferromagnetic materials are also good conductors and a core made from such a material also constitutes a single short-circuited turn throughout its entire length. Eddy currents therefore circulate within the core in a plane normal to the flux, and are responsible for resistive heating of the core material. The eddy current loss is a complex function of the square of supply frequency and inverse square of the material thickness.[53] Eddy current losses can be reduced by making the core of a stack of plates electrically insulated from each other, rather than a solid block; all transformers operating at low frequencies use laminated or similar cores.
- Magnetostriction
- Magnetic flux in a ferromagnetic material, such as the core, causes it to physically expand and contract slightly with each cycle of the magnetic field, an effect known as magnetostriction. This produces the buzzing sound commonly associated with transformers[38] that can cause losses due to frictional heating. This buzzing is particularly familiar from low-frequency (50 Hz or 60 Hz) mains hum, and high-frequency (15,734 Hz (NTSC) or 15,625 Hz (PAL)) CRT noise.
- Mechanical losses
- In addition to magnetostriction, the alternating magnetic field causes fluctuating forces between the primary and secondary windings. These incite vibrations within nearby metalwork, adding to the buzzing noise and consuming a small amount of power.[54]
- Stray losses
-
- Leakage inductance is by itself largely lossless, since energy supplied to its magnetic fields is returned to the supply with the next half-cycle. However, any leakage flux that intercepts nearby conductive materials such as the transformer's support structure will give rise to eddy currents and be converted to heat.[55] There are also radiative losses due to the oscillating magnetic field but these are usually small.
Main article:
Dot conventionIt is common in transformer schematic symbols for there to be a dot at the end of each coil within a transformer, particularly for transformers with multiple primary and secondary windings. The dots indicate the direction of each winding relative to the others. Voltages at the dot end of each winding are in phase; current flowing into the dot end of a primary coil will result in current flowing out of the dot end of a secondary coil.
Core form = core type; shell form = shell type
As first mentioned in regard to earliest ZBD closed-core transformers, transformers are generally considered to be either core form or shell form in design depending on the type of magnetic circuit used in winding construction (see image). That is, when winding coils are wound around the core, transformers are termed as being of core form design; when winding coils are surrounded by the core, transformers are termed as being of shell form design. Shell form design may be more prevalent than core form design for distribution transformer applications due to the relative ease in stacking the core around winding coils.[16] Core form design tends to, as a general rule, be more economical, and therefore more prevalent, than shell form design for high voltage power transformer applications at the lower end of their voltage and power rating ranges (less than or equal to, nominally, 230 kV or 75 MVA). At higher voltage and power ratings, shell form transformers tend to be more prevalent.[19][16][56][57] Shell form design tends to be preferred for extra high voltage and higher MVA applications because, though more labor intensive to manufacture, shell form transformers are characterized as having inherently better kVA-to-weight ratio, better short-circuit strength characteristics and higher immunity to transit damage.[57]
- Refer to the diagram below
The physical limitations of the practical transformer may be brought together as an equivalent circuit model (shown below) built around an ideal lossless transformer.[58] Power loss in the windings is current-dependent and is represented as in-series resistances Rp and Rs. Flux leakage results in a fraction of the applied voltage dropped without contributing to the mutual coupling, and thus can be modeled as reactances of each leakage inductance Xp and Xs in series with the perfectly coupled region.
Iron losses are caused mostly by hysteresis and eddy current effects in the core, and are proportional to the square of the core flux for operation at a given frequency.[59] Since the core flux is proportional to the applied voltage, the iron loss can be represented by a resistance RC in parallel with the ideal transformer.
A core with finite permeability requires a magnetizing current Im to maintain the mutual flux in the core. The magnetizing current is in phase with the flux. Saturation effects cause the relationship between the two to be non-linear, but for simplicity this effect tends to be ignored in most circuit equivalents.[60] With a sinusoidal supply, the core flux lags the induced EMF by 90° and this effect can be modeled as a magnetizing reactance (reactance of an effective inductance) Xm in parallel with the core loss component, Rc. Rc and Xm are sometimes together termed the magnetizing branch of the model. If the secondary winding is made open-circuit, the current I0 taken by the magnetizing branch represents the transformer's no-load current.[58]
The secondary impedance Rs and Xs is frequently moved (or "referred") to the primary side after multiplying the components by the impedance scaling factor (Np/Ns)2.
Transformer equivalent circuit, with secondary impedances referred to the primary side
The resulting model is sometimes termed the "exact equivalent circuit", though it retains a number of approximations, such as an assumption of linearity.[58] Analysis may be simplified by moving the magnetizing branch to the left of the primary impedance, an implicit assumption that the magnetizing current is low, and then summing primary and referred secondary impedances, resulting in so-called equivalent impedance.
The parameters of equivalent circuit of a transformer can be calculated from the results of two transformer tests: open-circuit test and short-circuit test.
A wide variety of transformer designs are used for different applications, though they share several common features. Important common transformer types are described below.
In an autotransformer portions of the same winding act as both the primary and secondary. The winding has at least three taps where electrical connections are made. An autotransformer can be smaller, lighter and cheaper than a standard dual-winding transformer however the autotransformer does not provide electrical isolation.
As an example of the material saving an autotransformer can provide, consider a double wound 2 kVA transformer designed to convert 240 volts to 120 volts. Such a transformer would require 8 amp wire for the 240 volt primary and 16 amp wire for the secondary. If constructed as an autotransformer, the output is a simple tap at the centre of the 240 volt winding. Even though the whole winding can be wound with 8 amp wire, 16 amps can nevertheless be drawn from the 120 volt tap. This comes about because the 8 amp 'primary' current is of opposite phase to the 16 amp 'secondary' current and thus it is the difference current that flows in the common part of the winding (8 amps). There is also considerable potential for savings on the core material as the apertures required to hold the windings are smaller. The advantage is at its greatest with a 2:1 ratio transformer and becomes smaller as the ratio is greater or smaller.
Autotransformers are often used to step up or down between voltages in the 110-117-120 volt range and voltages in the 220-230-240 volt range, e.g., to output either 110 or 120V (with taps) from 230V input, allowing equipment from a 100 or 120V region to be used in a 230V region.
A variable autotransformer is made by exposing part of the winding coils and making the secondary connection through a sliding brush, giving a variable turns ratio.[61] Such a device is often referred to by the trademark name Variac.
Three-phase step-down transformer mounted between two
utility poles
Screenshot of a FEM simulation of the magnetic flux inside a three-phase power transformer (
full animation)
For three-phase supplies, a bank of three individual single-phase transformers can be used, or all three phases can be incorporated as a single three-phase transformer. In this case, the magnetic circuits are connected together, the core thus containing a three-phase flow of flux.[62] A number of winding configurations are possible, giving rise to different attributes and phase shifts.[63] One particular polyphase configuration is the zigzag transformer, used for grounding and in the suppression of harmonic currents.[64]
A leakage transformer, also called a stray-field transformer, has a significantly higher leakage inductance than other transformers, sometimes increased by a magnetic bypass or shunt in its core between primary and secondary, which is sometimes adjustable with a set screw. This provides a transformer with an inherent current limitation due to the loose coupling between its primary and the secondary windings. The output and input currents are low enough to prevent thermal overload under all load conditions—even if the secondary is shorted.
Leakage transformers are used for arc welding and high voltage discharge lamps (neon lights and cold cathode fluorescent lamps, which are series-connected up to 7.5 kV AC). It acts then both as a voltage transformer and as a magnetic ballast.
Other applications are short-circuit-proof extra-low voltage transformers for toys or doorbell installations.
A resonant transformer is a kind of leakage transformer. It uses the leakage inductance of its secondary windings in combination with external capacitors, to create one or more resonant circuits. Resonant transformers such as the Tesla coil can generate very high voltages, and are able to provide much higher current than electrostatic high-voltage generation machines such as the Van de Graaff generator.[65] One of the applications of the resonant transformer is for the CCFL inverter. Another application of the resonant transformer is to couple between stages of a superheterodyne receiver, where the selectivity of the receiver is provided by tuned transformers in the intermediate-frequency amplifiers.[66]
Audio transformers are those specifically designed for use in audio circuits. They can be used to block radio frequency interference or the DC component of an audio signal, to split or combine audio signals, or to provide impedance matching between high and low impedance circuits, such as between a high impedance tube (valve) amplifier output and a low impedance loudspeaker, or between a high impedance instrument output and the low impedance input of a mixing console.
Such transformers were originally designed to connect different telephone systems to one another while keeping their respective power supplies isolated, and are still commonly used to interconnect professional audio systems or system components.
Being magnetic devices, audio transformers are susceptible to external magnetic fields such as those generated by AC current-carrying conductors. "Hum" is a term commonly used to describe unwanted signals originating from the "mains" power supply (typically 50 or 60 Hz). Audio transformers used for low-level signals, such as those from microphones, often include magnetic shielding to protect against extraneous magnetically-coupled signals.
Early audio amplifiers used transformers for coupling between stages, i.e., for transferring signal without connecting different operating voltages together. It was realised that transformers introduced distortion; furthermore they produced significant frequency-dependent phase shifts, particularly at higher frequencies. The phase shift was not problematical in itself, but made it difficult to introduce distortion-cancelling negative feedback, either over a transformer-coupled stage or the whole amplifier. Where they were used as a convenient way to isolate stages while coupling signals, transformers could be eliminated by using capacitor coupling. The transformer coupling the output of the amplifier to the loudspeaker, however, had the important requirement to couple the high impedance of the output valves with the low impedance of the loudspeakers. With the 1940s Williamson amplifier as a much-quoted early example, audio amplifiers with hitherto unprecedentedly low distortion were produced, using designs with only one transformer, the output transformer, and large overall negative feedback. Some attempts to design transformerless amplifiers were made, for example using very-low-impedance power triodes (such as the 6080, originally designed for power regulation), but were not widely used. The design of output transformers became a critical requirement for achieving low distortion, and carefully-designed, expensive components were produced with minimal inherent distortion and phase shift. Blumlein's Ultra-Linear transformer design was used in conjunction with Williamson's principles, allowing pentode or beam tetrode output devices to produce the higher power of a pentode than a triode, and lower distortion than either type.
Some early junction transistor amplifiers used transformers in the signal path, both interstage and output, but solid-state designs were rapidly produced with suitably low impedance to drive loudspeakers without using transformers, allowing very large amounts of feedback to be applied without instability.
Since the replacement of thermionic by solid-state electronics, signal transformers, including output transformers, are rarely or never used in modern audio designs. A few very expensive valve audio amplifiers are produced for vacuum-tube audio enthusiasts, and they require well-designed output transformers.
Instrument transformers are used for measuring voltage and current in electrical power systems, and for power system protection and control. Where a voltage or current is too large to be conveniently used by an instrument, it can be scaled down to a standardized low value. Instrument transformers isolate measurement, protection and control circuitry from the high currents or voltages present on the circuits being measured or controlled.
Current transformers, designed for placing around conductors
A current transformer is a transformer designed to provide a current in its secondary coil proportional to the current flowing in its primary coil.[67]
Voltage transformers (VTs), also referred to as "potential transformers" (PTs), are designed to have an accurately known transformation ratio in both magnitude and phase, over a range of measuring circuit impedances. A voltage transformer is intended to present a negligible load to the supply being measured. The low secondary voltage allows protective relay equipment and measuring instruments to be operated at a lower voltages.[68]
Both current and voltage instrument transformers are designed to have predictable characteristics on overloads. Proper operation of over-current protective relays requires that current transformers provide a predictable transformation ratio even during a short-circuit.
Electrical machines are generally understand to include not only rotating and linear electro-mechanical machines but transformers as well. Transformers can be further classified according to such key parameters as follow:
- Power capacity: from a fraction of a volt-ampere (VA) to over a thousand MVA;
- Duty of a transformer: continuous, short-time, intermittent, periodic, varying;
- Frequency range: power-, audio-, or radio frequency;
- Voltage class: from a few volts to hundreds of kilovolts;
- Cooling type: (dry and liquid-immersed) self-cooled, forced air-cooled; (liquid-immersed) forced oil-cooled, water-cooled;
- Application: such as power supply, impedance matching, output voltage and current stabilizer or circuit isolation;
- Purpose: distribution, rectifier, arc furnace, amplifier output, etc.;
- Basic magnetic form: core form, shell form;
- Constant-potential transformer descriptor: power, step-up, step-down, isolation, high-voltage, low voltage;
- Three phase winding configuration: autotransformer, delta, wye, zigzag;[69]
- Rectifier input phase-shift configuration: (n-winding -> p-pulse) 2-wdg -> 6-p, 3-wdg -> 12-p, . . . n-wdg -> [n-1]*6-p; polygon; etc.)
- System characteristics: ungrounded, solidly grounded, high or low resistance grounded, reactance grounded;
- Efficiency, losses and regulation: excitation, impedance & total losses, resistance, reactance & impedance drop, regulation.
Laminated core transformer showing edge of laminations at top of photo
Transformers for use at power or audio frequencies typically have cores made of high permeability silicon steel.[70] The steel has a permeability many times that of free space and the core thus serves to greatly reduce the magnetizing current and confine the flux to a path which closely couples the windings.[71] Early transformer developers soon realized that cores constructed from solid iron resulted in prohibitive eddy-current losses, and their designs mitigated this effect with cores consisting of bundles of insulated iron wires.[11] Later designs constructed the core by stacking layers of thin steel laminations, a principle that has remained in use. Each lamination is insulated from its neighbors by a thin non-conducting layer of insulation.[62] The universal transformer equation indicates a minimum cross-sectional area for the core to avoid saturation.
The effect of laminations is to confine eddy currents to highly elliptical paths that enclose little flux, and so reduce their magnitude. Thinner laminations reduce losses,[72] but are more laborious and expensive to construct.[73] Thin laminations are generally used on high frequency transformers, with some types of very thin steel laminations able to operate up to 10 kHz.
Laminating the core greatly reduces eddy-current losses
One common design of laminated core is made from interleaved stacks of E-shaped steel sheets capped with I-shaped pieces, leading to its name of "E-I transformer".[73] Such a design tends to exhibit more losses, but is very economical to manufacture. The cut-core or C-core type is made by winding a steel strip around a rectangular form and then bonding the layers together. It is then cut in two, forming two C shapes, and the core assembled by binding the two C halves together with a steel strap.[73] They have the advantage that the flux is always oriented parallel to the metal grains, reducing reluctance.
A steel core's remanence means that it retains a static magnetic field when power is removed. When power is then reapplied, the residual field will cause a high inrush current until the effect of the remaining magnetism is reduced, usually after a few cycles of the applied alternating current.[74] Overcurrent protection devices such as fuses must be selected to allow this harmless inrush to pass. On transformers connected to long, overhead power transmission lines, induced currents due to geomagnetic disturbances during solar storms can cause saturation of the core and operation of transformer protection devices.[75]
Distribution transformers can achieve low no-load losses by using cores made with low-loss high-permeability silicon steel or amorphous (non-crystalline) metal alloy. The higher initial cost of the core material is offset over the life of the transformer by its lower losses at light load.[76]
Powdered iron cores are used in circuits such as switch-mode power supplies that operate above mains frequencies and up to a few tens of kilohertz. These materials combine high magnetic permeability with high bulk electrical resistivity. For frequencies extending beyond the VHF band, cores made from non-conductive magnetic ceramic materials called ferrites are common.[73] Some radio-frequency transformers also have movable cores (sometimes called 'slugs') which allow adjustment of the coupling coefficient (and bandwidth) of tuned radio-frequency circuits.
Small toroidal core transformer
Toroidal transformers are built around a ring-shaped core, which, depending on operating frequency, is made from a long strip of silicon steel or permalloy wound into a coil, powdered iron, or ferrite.[77] A strip construction ensures that the grain boundaries are optimally aligned, improving the transformer's efficiency by reducing the core's reluctance. The closed ring shape eliminates air gaps inherent in the construction of an E-I core.[78] The cross-section of the ring is usually square or rectangular, but more expensive cores with circular cross-sections are also available. The primary and secondary coils are often wound concentrically to cover the entire surface of the core. This minimizes the length of wire needed, and also provides screening to minimize the core's magnetic field from generating electromagnetic interference.
Toroidal transformers are more efficient than the cheaper laminated E-I types for a similar power level. Other advantages compared to E-I types, include smaller size (about half), lower weight (about half), less mechanical hum (making them superior in audio amplifiers), lower exterior magnetic field (about one tenth), low off-load losses (making them more efficient in standby circuits), single-bolt mounting, and greater choice of shapes. The main disadvantages are higher cost and limited power capacity (see "Classification" above). Because of the lack of a residual gap in the magnetic path, toroidal transformers also tend to exhibit higher inrush current, compared to laminated E-I types.
Ferrite toroidal cores are used at higher frequencies, typically between a few tens of kilohertz to hundreds of megahertz, to reduce losses, physical size, and weight of a switched-mode power supply. A drawback of toroidal transformer construction is the higher labor cost of winding. This is because it is necessary to pass the entire length of a coil winding through the core aperture each time a single turn is added to the coil. As a consequence, toroidal transformers are uncommon above ratings of a few kVA. Small distribution transformers may achieve some of the benefits of a toroidal core by splitting it and forcing it open, then inserting a bobbin containing primary and secondary windings.
A physical core is not an absolute requisite and a functioning transformer can be produced simply by placing the windings near each other, an arrangement termed an "air-core" transformer. The air which comprises the magnetic circuit is essentially lossless, and so an air-core transformer eliminates loss due to hysteresis in the core material.[41] The leakage inductance is inevitably high, resulting in very poor regulation, and so such designs are unsuitable for use in power distribution.[41] They have however very high bandwidth, and are frequently employed in radio-frequency applications,[79] for which a satisfactory coupling coefficient is maintained by carefully overlapping the primary and secondary windings. They're also used for resonant transformers such as Tesla coils where they can achieve reasonably low loss in spite of the high leakage inductance.
Windings are usually arranged concentrically to minimize flux leakage.
The conducting material used for the windings depends upon the application, but in all cases the individual turns must be electrically insulated from each other to ensure that the current travels throughout every turn.[80] For small power and signal transformers, in which currents are low and the potential difference between adjacent turns is small, the coils are often wound from enamelled magnet wire, such as Formvar wire. Larger power transformers operating at high voltages may be wound with copper rectangular strip conductors insulated by oil-impregnated paper and blocks of pressboard.[81]
Cut view through transformer windings. White: insulator. Green spiral:
Grain oriented silicon steel. Black: Primary winding made of
oxygen-free copper. Red: Secondary winding. Top left: Toroidal transformer. Right: C-core, but E-core would be similar. The black windings are made of film. Top: Equally low capacitance between all ends of both windings. Since most cores are at least moderately conductive they also need insulation. Bottom: Lowest capacitance for one end of the secondary winding needed for low-power high-voltage transformers. Bottom left: Reduction of
leakage inductance would lead to increase of capacitance.
High-frequency transformers operating in the tens to hundreds of kilohertz often have windings made of braided Litz wire to minimize the skin-effect and proximity effect losses.[46] Large power transformers use multiple-stranded conductors as well, since even at low power frequencies non-uniform distribution of current would otherwise exist in high-current windings.[81] Each strand is individually insulated, and the strands are arranged so that at certain points in the winding, or throughout the whole winding, each portion occupies different relative positions in the complete conductor. The transposition equalizes the current flowing in each strand of the conductor, and reduces eddy current losses in the winding itself. The stranded conductor is also more flexible than a solid conductor of similar size, aiding manufacture.[81]
For signal transformers, the windings may be arranged in a way to minimize leakage inductance and stray capacitance to improve high-frequency response. This can be done by splitting up each coil into sections, and those sections placed in layers between the sections of the other winding. This is known as a stacked type or interleaved winding.
Power transformers often have internal connections or taps at intermediate points on the winding, usually on the higher voltage winding side, for voltage regulation control purposes. Such taps are normally manually operated, automatic on-load tap changers being reserved, for cost and reliability considerations, to higher power rated or specialized transformers supplying transmission or distribution circuits or certain utilization loads such as furnace transformers. Audio-frequency transformers, used for the distribution of audio to public address loudspeakers, have taps to allow adjustment of impedance to each speaker. A center-tapped transformer is often used in the output stage of an audio power amplifier in a push-pull circuit. Modulation transformers in AM transmitters are very similar.
Certain transformers have the windings protected by epoxy resin. By impregnating the transformer with epoxy under a vacuum, one can replace air spaces within the windings with epoxy, thus sealing the windings and helping to prevent the possible formation of corona and absorption of dirt or water. This produces transformers more suited to damp or dirty environments, but at increased manufacturing cost.[82]
Cutaway view of oil-filled power transformer. The conservator (reservoir) at top provides oil-to-atmosphere isolation. Tank walls' cooling fins provide required heat dissipation balance.
Though it is not uncommon for oil-filled transformers to have today been in operation for over fifty years[83] high temperature damages winding insulation,[84] the accepted rule of thumb being that transformer life expectancy is halved for every 8 degree C increase in operating temperature.[85] At the lower end of the power rating range, dry and liquid-immersed transformers are often self-cooled by natural convection and radiation heat dissipation. As power ratings increase, transformers are often cooled by such other means as forced-air cooling, force-oil cooling, water-cooling, or a combinations of these.[86] The dielectic coolant used in many outdoor utility and industrial service transformers is transformer oil that both cools and insulates the windings.[87] Transformer oil is a highly refined mineral oil that inherently helps thermally stabilize winding conductor insulation, typically paper, within acceptable insulation temperature rating limitations. However, the heat removal problem is central to all electrical apparatus such that in the case of high value transfomer assets, this often translates in a need to monitor, model, forecast and manage oil and winding conductor insulation temperature conditions under varying, possibly difficult, power loading conditions. Indoor liquid-filled transformers are required by building regulations in many jurisdictions to either use a non-flammable liquid or to be located in fire-resistant rooms.[88] Air-cooled dry transformers are preferred for indoor applications even at capacity ratings where oil-cooled construction would be more economical, because their cost is offset by the reduced building construction cost.
The oil-filled tank often has radiators through which the oil circulates by natural convection. Some large transformers employ electric-operated fans or pumps for forced-air or forced-oil cooling or heat exchanger-based water-cooling.[87] Oil-filled transformers undergo prolonged drying processes to ensure that the transformer is completely free of water vapor before the cooling oil is introduced. This helps prevent electrical breakdown under load. Oil-filled transformers may be equipped with Buchholz relays, which detect gas evolved during internal arcing and rapidly de-energize the transformer to avert catastrophic failure.[74] Oil-filled transformers may fail, rupture, and burn, causing power outages and losses. Installations of oil-filled transformers usually includes fire protection measures such as walls, oil containment, and fire-suppression sprinkler systems.
Polychlorinated biphenyls have properties that once favored their use as a dielectic coolant, though concerns over their environmental persistence led to a widespread ban on their use.[89] Today, non-toxic, stable silicone-based oils, or fluorinated hydrocarbons may be used where the expense of a fire-resistant liquid offsets additional building cost for a transformer vault.[84][88] Before 1977, even transformers that were nominally filled only with mineral oils may also have been contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls at 10-20 ppm. Since mineral oil and PCB fluid mix, maintenance equipment used for both PCB and oil-filled transformers could carry over small amounts of PCB, contaminating oil-filled transformers.[90]
Some "dry" transformers (containing no liquid) are enclosed in sealed, pressurized tanks and cooled by nitrogen or sulfur hexafluoride gas.[84]
Experimental power transformers in the 2 MVA range have been built with superconducting windings which eliminates the copper losses, but not the core steel loss. These are cooled by liquid nitrogen or helium.[91]
Construction of oil-filled transformers requires that the insulation covering the windings be thoroughly dried before the oil is introduced. There are several different methods of drying. Common for all is that they are carried out in vacuum environment. The vacuum makes it difficult to transfer energy (heat) to the insulation. For this there are several different methods. The traditional drying is done by circulating hot air over the active part and cycle this with periods of hot-air vacuum (HAV) drying. More common for larger transformers is to use evaporated solvent which condenses on the colder active part. The benefit is that the entire process can be carried out at lower pressure and without influence of added oxygen. This process is commonly called vapour-phase drying (VPD).
For distribution transformers, which are smaller and have a smaller insulation weight, resistance heating can be used. This is a method where current is injected in the windings to heat the insulation. The benefit is that the heating can be controlled very well and it is energy efficient. The method is called low-frequency heating (LFH) since the current is injected at a much lower frequency than the nominal of the grid, which is normally 50 or 60 Hz. A lower frequency reduces the effect of the inductance in the transformer, so the voltage needed to induce the current can be reduced.[92] The LFH drying method is also used for service of older transformers.[93]
Very small transformers will have wire leads connected directly to the ends of the coils, and brought out to the base of the unit for circuit connections. Larger transformers may have heavy bolted terminals, bus bars or high-voltage insulated bushings made of polymers or porcelain. A large bushing can be a complex structure since it must provide careful control of the electric field gradient without letting the transformer leak oil.[94]
A major application of transformers is to increase voltage before transmitting electrical energy over long distances through wires. Wires have resistance and so dissipate electrical energy at a rate proportional to the square of the current through the wire. By transforming electrical power to a high-voltage (and therefore low-current) form for transmission and back again afterward, transformers enable economical transmission of power over long distances. Consequently, transformers have shaped the electricity supply industry, permitting generation to be located remotely from points of demand.[95] All but a tiny fraction of the world's electrical power has passed through a series of transformers by the time it reaches the consumer.[55]
Transformers are also used extensively in electronic products to step down the supply voltage to a level suitable for the low voltage circuits they contain. The transformer also electrically isolates the end user from contact with the supply voltage.
Signal and audio transformers are used to couple stages of amplifiers and to match devices such as microphones and record players to the input of amplifiers. Audio transformers allowed telephone circuits to carry on a two-way conversation over a single pair of wires. A balun transformer converts a signal that is referenced to ground to a signal that has balanced voltages to ground, such as between external cables and internal circuits.
The principle of open-circuit (unloaded) transformer is widely used for characterisation of soft magnetic materials, for example in the internationally standardised Epstein frame method.[96]
- ^ Poyser, Arthur William (1892). Magnetism and Electricity: A Manual for Students in Advanced Classes. London and New York: Longmans, Green, & Co.. p. 285, fig. 248. http://books.google.com/books?id=JzBAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA285. Retrieved Aug. 6, 2009.
- ^ "Joseph Henry". Distinguished Members Gallery, National Academy of Sciences. http://www.nas.edu/history/members/henry.html. Retrieved Nov. 30, 2006.
- ^ Chow, Tai L. (2006). Introduction to Electromagnetic Theory: A Modern Perspective. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. p. 171. ISBN 0-7637-3827-1. http://books.google.com/books?id=dpnpMhw1zo8C&pg=PA171&dq=isbn%3D0763738271+%22Time-Dependent+Magnetic+fields+and+Faraday%27s+Law+of+Induction%22&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false.
- ^ Faraday, Michael (1834). "Experimental Researches on Electricity, 7th Series". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 124: 77–122. DOI:10.1098/rstl.1834.0008.
- ^ Hawkins, Nehemiah (1917). Hawkins Electrical Guide Number Two, Questions, Answers & Illustrations: a Progressive Course of Study for Engineers, Electricians, Students and those Desiring to Acquire a Working Knowledge of Electricity and its Applications. New York: Theo. Audel & Co. p. 715. http://books.google.com/books?id=yyEVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA715#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- ^ Hawkins, Nehemiah (1917). Hawkins Electrical Guide Number Two, Questions, Answers & Illustrations: a Progressive Course of Study for Engineers, Electricians, Students and those Desiring to Acquire a Working Knowledge of Electricity and its Applications. New York: Theo. Audel & Co. p. 704-705. http://books.google.com/books?id=yyEVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA704#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- ^ Hawkins, Nehemiah (1917). Hawkins Electrical Guide Number Two, Questions, Answers & Illustrations: a Progressive Course of Study for Engineers, Electricians, Students and those Desiring to Acquire a Working Knowledge of Electricity and its Applications. New York: Theo. Audel & Co. p. 701. http://books.google.com/books?id=yyEVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA704#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- ^ a b "Stanley Transformer". Los Alamos National Laboratory; University of Florida. http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/museum/stanleytransformer.html. Retrieved Jan. 9, 2009.
- ^ De Fonveille, W. (Jan. 22, 1880). "Gas and Electricity in Paris". Nature 21 (534): 283. http://books.google.com/?id=ksa-S7C8dT8C&pg=RA2-PA283. Retrieved Jan. 9, 2009.
- ^ Hughes, Thomas P. (1993). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 96. ISBN 0-8018-2873-2. http://books.google.com/?id=g07Q9M4agp4C&pg=PA96&dq=Networks+of+Power:+Electrification+in+Western+Society,+1880-1930+ganz#v=onepage&q=. Retrieved Sep. 9, 2009.
- ^ a b Allan, D.J. (Jan. 1991). "Power Transformers – The Second Century". Power Engineering Journal 5 (1): 5–14. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=61984.
- ^ a b c d e Uppenborn, F. J. (1889). History of the Transformer. London: E. & F. N. Spon. pp. 35–41. http://www.archive.org/details/historyoftransfo00upperich.
- ^ a b Coltman, J. W. (Jan. 1988). "The Transformer". Scientific American: pp. 86–95. OSTI 6851152.
- ^ a b Stanley, William, Jr.. "Induction Coil". U.S. Patent 349 311, issued Sept. 21, 1886. http://www.google.com/patents?vid=349611. Retrieved July 13, 2009.
- ^ Hughes, p. 95
- ^ a b c Del Vecchio, Robert M. et al. (2002). Transformer Design Principles: With Applications to Core-Form Power Transformers. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 10–11, Fig. 1.8. ISBN 90-5699-703-3. http://books.google.ca/books/about/Transformer_design_principles.html?id=Lzjs0LNHhVYC&redir_esc=y.
- ^ Károly, Simonyi. "The Faraday Law With a Magnetic Ohm's Law". Természet Világa. http://www.termeszetvilaga.hu/kulonsz/k011/46.html. Retrieved Mar. 1, 2012.
- ^ Lucas, J.R.. "Historical Development of the Transformer". IEE Sri Lanka Centre. http://www.elect.mrt.ac.lk/Transformer_history_2000.pdf. Retrieved Mar. 1, 2012.
- ^ a b Knowlton, A.E. (Ed.) (1949). Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 562.
- ^ a b Halacsy, A. A.; Von Fuchs, G. H. (April 1961). "Transformer Invented 75 Years Ago". IEEE Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 80 (3): 121–125. DOI:10.1109/AIEEPAS.1961.4500994. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/freesearchresult.jsp?newsearch=true&queryText=10.1109%2FAIEEPAS.1961.4500994&x=29&y=16. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2012.
- ^ Jeszenszky, Sándor. "Electrostatics and Electrodynamics at Pest University in the Mid-19th Century". University of Pavia. http://ppp.unipv.it/Collana/Pages/Libri/Saggi/Volta%20and%20the%20History%20of%20Electricity/V%26H%20Sect2/V%26H%20175-182.pdf. Retrieved Mar.3, 2012.
- ^ "Hungarian Inventors and Their Inventions". Institute for Developing Alternative Energy in Latin America. http://www.institutoideal.org/conteudo_eng.php?&sys=biblioteca_eng&arquivo=1&artigo=94&ano=2008. Retrieved Mar. 3, 2012.
- ^ "Bláthy, Ottó Titusz". Budapest University of Technology and Economics, National Technical Information Centre and Library. http://www.omikk.bme.hu/archivum/angol/htm/blathy_o.htm. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2012.
- ^ a b "Bláthy, Ottó Titusz (1860 - 1939)". Hungarian Patent Office. http://www.hpo.hu/English/feltalalok/blathy.html. Retrieved Jan. 29, 2004.
- ^ Zipernowsky, K.; Déri, M.; Bláthy, O.T.. "Induction Coil". U.S. Patent 352 105, issued Nov. 2, 1886. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/0352105.pdf. Retrieved July 8, 2009.
- ^ a b Smil, Vaclav (2005). Creating the Twentieth Century: Technical Innovations of 1867—1914 and Their Lasting Impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 71. http://books.google.com/books?id=w3Mh7qQRM-IC&pg=PA71&lpg=PA71&dq=ZBD+transformer&source=bl&ots=HRDljDzbiz&sig=F-cGB0B8BjL32gIunSIvtSB5hYc&hl=en&ei=k7tXSpvIDoT-MPGahJ0I&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4.
- ^ Nagy, Árpád Zoltán (Oct. 11, 1996). "Lecture to Mark the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron in 1897 (preliminary text)". Budapest. http://www.kfki.hu/~aznagy/lecture/lecture.htm. Retrieved July 9, 2009.
- ^ Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 1989.
- ^ Hospitalier, Édouard; as translated by Julius Maier (1882). The Modern Applications of Electricity. New York: D. Appleton & Co.. p. 103. http://books.google.com/books?id=qt8JAAAAIAAJ.
- ^ "Ottó Bláthy, Miksa Déri, Károly Zipernowsky". IEC Techline. http://www.iec.ch/cgi-bin/tl_to_htm.pl?section=technology&item=144. Retrieved Apr. 16, 2010.
- ^ Skrabec, Quentin R. (2007). George Westinghouse: Gentle Genius. Algora Publishing. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-87586-508-9. http://books.google.com/?id=C3GYdiFM41oC&pg=PA102.
- ^ a b Coltman, J.W.; (Jan-Feb 2002). "The Transformer [Historical Overview"]. Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE 8 (1): 8–15. DOI:10.1109/2943.974352. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=974352. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2012.
- ^ Westinghouse, George, Jr.. "Electrical Converter". U.S. Patent 366 362, issued July 12, 1887. http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=NmRDAAAAEBAJ&dq=366362.
- ^ Neidhöfer, Gerhard; in collaboration with VDE "History of Electrical Engineering" Committee (2008) (in German). Michael von Dolivo-Dobrowolsky and Three-Phase: The Beginnings of Modern Drive Technology and Power Supply (2 ed.). Berlin: VDE-Verl.. ISBN 978-3-8007-3115-2. http://d-nb.info/990964361.
- ^ Uth, Robert (Dec. 12, 2000). "Tesla Coil". Tesla: Master of Lightning. PBS.org. http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ins/lab_tescoil.html. Retrieved May 20, 2008.
- ^ Tesla, Nikola. "System of Electrical Lighting". U.S. Patent 454 622, issued June 23, 1891. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=0454622.PN.&OS=PN/0454622&RS=PN/0454622.
- ^ a b Flanagan, William M. (1993). Handbook of Transformer Design and Applications. McGraw-Hill Professional. Chap. 1, p. 1–2. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/00070212910|00070212910]].
- ^ a b Winders, John J., Jr. (2002). Power Transformer Principles and Applications. CRC. pp. 20–21.
- ^ a b c d Say, M. G. (1984). Alternating Current Machines (5th ed.). Halsted Press. ISBN 0-470-27451-4.
- ^ Heathcote, Martin (Nov. 3, 1998). J & P Transformer Book (12th ed.). Newnes. pp. 2–3. ISBN 0-7506-1158-8.
- ^ a b c d e Calvert, James (2001). "Inside Transformers". University of Denver. http://www.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/transfor.htm. Retrieved May 19, 2007.
- ^ a b McLaren, P. G. (1984). Elementary Electric Power and Machines. pp. 68–74. ISBN 0-13-257601-5.
- ^ Edwards, J.; Saha, T. K. (2000). "Power Flow in Transformers Via the Poynting Vector". AUPEC 2000 Proceedings. Queensland University of Technology. http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~aupec/aupec00/edwards00.pdf.
- ^ Say, p. 485
- ^ Terman, Frederick E. (1955). Electronic and Radio Engineering (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 15.
- ^ a b Dixon, Lloyd (2001). "Power Transformer Design". Magnetics Design Handbook. Texas Instruments. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ml/slup126/slup126.pdf.
- ^ a b Billings, Keith (1999). Switchmode Power Supply Handbook. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-006719-8.
- ^ "400 Hz Electrical Systems". Aerospaceweb.org. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/electronics/q0219.shtml. Retrieved May 21, 2007.
- ^ Kubo, T.; Sachs, H.; Nadel, S. (2001). Opportunities for New Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. p. 39. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/a016. Retrieved June 21, 2009.
- ^ Riemersma, H.; Eckels, P.; Barton, M.; Murphy, J.; Litz, D.; Roach, J. (1981). "Application of Superconducting Technology to Power Transformers". IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-100 (7): 3398. DOI:10.1109/TPAS.1981.316682. http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=0043264EA&q=superconducting+transformer&uid=790516502&setcookie=yes.
- ^ Heathcote, pp. 41-42
- ^ Heathcote, pp. 41-42
- ^ Heathcote, pp. 41-42
- ^ Pansini, Anthony J. (1999). Electrical Transformers and Power Equipment. Fairmont Press. p. 23. ISBN 0-88173-311-3.
- ^ a b Nailen, Richard (May 2005). "Why We Must Be Concerned With Transformers". Electrical Apparatus. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3726/is_200505/ai_n13636839/pg_1.
- ^ Hydroelectric Research and Technical Services Group. "Transformers: Basics, Maintenance, and Diagnostics". U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. p. 12. http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps113746/Trnsfrmr.pdf. Retrieved Mar. 27, 2012.
- ^ a b EM 1110-2-3006 (1994). "Chapter 4 - Power Transformers". Engineering and Design - Hydroelectric Power Plants Electrical Design. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. p. 4-1. http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-manuals/em1110-2-3006/c-4.pdf.
- ^ a b c Daniels, A. R.. Introduction to Electrical Machines. pp. 47–49.
- ^ Say, pp. 142–143
- ^ Say, pp.142-143
- ^ Bakshi, M. V.; Bakshi, U. A.. Electrical Machines - I. p. 330. ISBN 81-8431-009-9.
- ^ a b Kulkarni, S. V.; Khaparde, S. A. (May 24, 2004). Transformer Engineering: Design and Practice. CRC. pp. 36–37. ISBN 0-8247-5653-3.
- ^ Say, p. 166
- ^ Hindmarsh, J. (1984). Electrical Machines and Their Applications.. Oxford: Pergamon Press. pp. 173. ISBN 0-08-030573-3.
- ^ Abdel-Salam, M. et al. (2000). High-Voltage Engineering: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). pp. 523–524. ISBN 0-8247-0402-9.
- ^ Carr, Joseph (2001). Secrets of RF Circuit Design. pp. 193–195. ISBN 0-07-137067-6.
- ^ Guile, A.; Paterson, W. (1978). Electrical Power Systems, Volume One. Oxford: Pergamon Press. pp. 330–331. ISBN 0-08-021729-X.
- ^ Institution of Electrical Engineers (1995). Power System Protection. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers. pp. 38–39. ISBN 0-85296-834-5.
- ^ Lawhead, Larry et al. "Three Phase Transformer Winding Configurations and Differential Relay Compensation, pp. 8-10". Georgia Tech 60th Protective Relay Conference (2006). http://basler.com/downloads/3phXfmrs.pdf. Retrieved Feb. 23, 2012.
- ^ Hindmarsh, pp. 29-31
- ^ Gottlieb, Irving (1998). Practical Transformer Handbook. Newnes. p. 4. ISBN 0-7506-3992-X.
- ^ Hindmarsh, pp. 29-31
- ^ a b c d McLyman, Colonel Wm. T. (2004). Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook. CRC. Chap. 3, pp. 9–14. ISBN 0-8247-5393-3.
- ^ a b Harlow, James H. (Ed.) (2004). Electric Power Transformer Engineering. CRC/Taylor & Francis. Chap. 2, pp. 20–21.
- ^ Boteler, D. H.; Pirjola, R. J.; Nevanlinna, H. (1998). "The Effects of Geomagnetic Disturbances On Electrical Systems at the Earth's Surface". Advances in Space Research 22: 17–27. DOI:10.1016/S0273-1177(97)01096-X.
- ^ Hasegawa, Ryusuke (June 2, 2000). "Present Status of Amorphous Soft Magnetic Alloys". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 215-216: 240–245. DOI:10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00126-8.
- ^ McLyman, Chap. 3 p. 1
- ^ Say, p. 485
- ^ Lee, Reuben. "Air-Core Transformers". Electronic Transformers and Circuits. http://www.vias.org/eltransformers/lee_electronic_transformers_07b_22.html. Retrieved May 22, 2007.
- ^ Dixon, L.H., Jr. (1997). Eddy Current Losses in Transformer Windings. Texas Instrument. pp. R2-1-to-R2-10. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ml/slup197/slup197.pdf.
- ^ a b c Central Electricity Generating Board (1982). Modern Power Station Practice. Pergamon Press.
- ^ Heathcote, pp. 720–723
- ^ Prevost, Thomas A. et al. (Nov. 2006). "Estimation of Insulation Life Based on a Dual Temperature Aging Mode". Weidmann. p. 1. http://www.weidmann-solutions.cn/huiyi/Seminar%202006%20New%20Mexico/2006prevostpaperyes.pdf. Retrieved Mar. 30, 2012.
- ^ a b c Kulkarni, S. V.; Khaparde, S. A. (May 24, 2004). Transformer Engineering: design and practice. CRC. pp. 2–3. ISBN 0-8247-5653-3.
- ^ Grigsby, L. L. (Ed.) (2001). "Chapter 3 - Transformers by James H. Harlow". The Electric Power Engineering Handbook ([Online-Ausg.] ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 3-155. ISBN 0-8493-8578-4.
- ^ Pansini, p. 32
- ^ a b Willis, H. Lee (2004). Power Distribution Planning Reference Book. CRC Press. p. 403. ISBN 0-8247-4875-1.
- ^ a b De Keulenaer, H. et al (2001). The Scope for Energy Saving in the EU Through the Use of Energy-Efficient Electricity Distribution Transformers. Institution of Engineering and Technology. http://www.leonardo-energy.org/drupal/files/Full%20project%20report%20-%20Thermie.pdf?download.
- ^ "ASTDR ToxFAQs for Polychlorinated Biphenyls". 2001. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tf.asp?id=140&tid=26. Retrieved June 10, 2007.
- ^ McDonald, C. J.; Tourangeau, R. E. (1986). PCBs: Question and Answer Guide Concerning Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Government of Canada: Environment Canada Department. p. 9. ISBN 0-662-14595-X. http://www.ec.gc.ca/wmd-dgd/default.asp?lang=En&n=AD2C1530-1&offset=3&toc=show#anchor6. Retrieved Nov. 7, 2007.
- ^ Pansini, pp. 66–67
- ^ Fink, Donald G.; Beatty, H. Wayne (Eds.) (1978). Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers (11th ed.). pp. 10-38 through 10-40. ISBN 0-07-02974-x.
- ^ Figueroa, Elisa et al (Jan/Feb 2009). "Low Frequency Heating Field Dry-Out of a 750 MVA 500 kV Auto Transformer". Electricity Today. http://www.electricity-today.com/et/issue0109/transformer_field_dry-out.pdf. Retrieved Feb. 28, 2012.
- ^ Ryan, Hugh M. (2001). High Voltage Engineering and Testing. Institution Electrical Engineers. pp. 416–417. ISBN 0-85296-775-6.
- ^ Heathcote, p. 1
- ^ IEC Std 60404-2 Magnetic Materials - Part 2: Methods of Measurement of the Magnetic Properties . . .
- Central Electricity Generating Board (1982). Modern Power Station Practice. Pergamon. ISBN 0-08-016436-6.
- Daniels, A.R. (1985). Introduction to Electrical Machines. Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-19627-9.
- Flanagan, William (1993). Handbook of Transformer Design and Applications (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-021291-0.
- Gottlieb, Irving (1998). Practical Transformer Handbook. Elsevier. ISBN 0-7506-3992-X.
- Hammond, John Winthrop. Men and Volts, the Story of General Electric, published 1941 by J.B.Lippincott. Citations: design, early types - 106-107; design, William Stanley, first built - 178; oil-immersed, began use of - 238.
- Harlow, James (2004). Electric Power Transformer Engineering. CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-1704-5.
- Heathcote, Martin (1998). J & P Transformer Book (12th ed.). Newnes. ISBN 0-7506-1158-8.
- Hindmarsh, John (1977). Electrical Machines and Their Applications (4th ed.). Exeter: Pergammon. ISBN 0-08-030573-3.
- Kulkarni, S.V.; Khaparde, S.A. (2004). Transformer Engineering: Design and Practice. CRC Press. ISBN 0-8247-5653-3.
- McLaren, Peter (1984). Elementary Electric Power and Machines. Ellis Horwood. ISBN 0-470-20057-X.
- McLyman, Colonel William (2004). Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook. CRC. ISBN 0-8247-5393-3.
- Pansini, Anthony (1999). Electrical Transformers and Power Equipment. CRC Press. p. 23. ISBN 0-88173-311-3.
- Ryan, H.M. (2004). High Voltage Engineering and Testing. CRC Press. ISBN 0-85296-775-6.
- Say, M.G. (1983). Alternating Current Machines (5th ed.). London: Pitman. ISBN 0-273-01969-4.
- Winders, Jr., John J. (2002). Power Transformer Principles and Applications. CRC. ISBN 0-8247-0766-4.
- Gururaj, B.I. (June 1963). "Natural Frequencies of 3-Phase Transformer Windings". IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 82 (66): 318–329. DOI:10.1109/TPAS.1963.291359. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=4072786&arnumber=4072800&count=25&index=12.
