Leland Bowman Lock near Intracoastal City, Louisiana, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

The Gulf Intracoastal Waterway enters Galveston Bay at Port Bolivar, Texas

The Gulf Intracoastal Waterway is the portion of the Intracoastal Waterway located along the Gulf Coast of the United States. It is a navigable inland waterway running approximately 1700 kilometers (1050 mi) from Carrabelle, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas.

The waterway provides a channel with a controlling depth of 3.7 meters (12 ft), designed primarily for barge transportation. Although the U.S. government proposals for such a waterway were made in the early 19th century,^[1] the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway was not completed until 1949.^[2]

EHL & WHL mileages[link]

Locations along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway are defined in terms of statute miles (as opposed to nautical miles, in which most marine routes are measured) east and west of Harvey Lock, a navigation lock in the New Orleans area located at 29°54′32″N 90°05′02″W / 29.909°N 90.084°W / 29.909; -90.084. The Hathaway Bridge in Panama City, Florida, for example, is at mile 284.6 EHL (East of Harvey Lock). The Queen Isabella Causeway Bridge at South Padre Island is at mile 665.1 WHL (West of Harvey Lock).^[3]

Connecting waterways[link]

The Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses or meets, and in some cases is confluent with, numerous other navigable rivers and waterways. They include:

The Corps of Engineers marks the Intracoastal with channel markers like this one.

• Apalachicola River
• Atchafalaya River
• Bayou Lafourche
• Calcasieu River
• Calcasieu Ship Channel
• Delcambre Canal
• Houston Ship Channel
• Industrial Canal
• Lower Mississippi River
• Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet Canal
• Mobile Bay (connecting to the Tenn-Tom Waterway)
• Neches River
• Pearl River
• Sabine River
• Santa Rosa Sound
• The Rigolets
• Vermilion River

Ports and harbors[link]

Notable ports on or near the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway include:

• Port of South Louisiana
• Carrabelle, Florida
• Gulfport, Mississippi
• Houma, Louisiana
• Intracoastal City, Louisiana
• Larose, Louisiana
• Morgan City, Louisiana
• Panama City, Florida
• Pascagoula, Mississippi
• Pensacola, Florida
• Apalachicola, Florida
• Brownsville, Texas
• Corpus Christi, Texas
• Galveston, Texas
• Houston, Texas
• Lake Charles, Louisiana
• Mobile, Alabama
• New Orleans, Louisiana
• Baton Rouge, Louisiana
• Port Allen, Louisiana
• Port Arthur, Texas
• Port Lavaca - Point Comfort, Texas
• Texas City, Texas
• Victoria, Texas

See also[link]

• Waterways along and crossings of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
• IHNC Lake Borgne Surge Barrier
• Gulf Intracoastal Waterway West Closure Complex

References[link]

1. ^ "The Handbook of Texas Online". University of Texas. http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/GG/rrg4.html. Retrieved 2006-03-08. 
2. ^ Lynn M. Alperin. "History of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway" (PDF). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Office of History. Archived from the original on 2005-12-08. http://web.archive.org/web/20051208070639/http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/misc/nws83-9/entire.pdf. Retrieved 2006-04-03. 
3. ^ "33 CFR 89.25 Waters Specified by the Secretary" (PDF). U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center. http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pdf/navRules/Insert_Page207208.pdf. Retrieved 2006-04-21. 

Tug and barge on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

Navigation on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, where it intersects with Bayou Perot, in the vicinity of New Orleans

A section of the Intracoastal Waterway in Pamlico County, North Carolina. The Hobucken Bridge crosses the waterway.

Tug and barges on Intracoastal Canal, Bolivar Peninsula, Texas

The Intracoastal Waterway is a 3,000-mile (4,800-km) waterway along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States. Some lengths consist of natural inlets, salt-water rivers, bays, and sounds; others are artificial canals. It provides a navigable route along its length without many of the hazards of travel on the open sea.

Context and early history[link]

The shipping hazards and safe havens of the Atlantic coast were well known and appreciated since colonial times, and considered of great communication, commercial and military importance to both the colonial power and the newly established, independent United States. The physical features of the eastern coast were advantageous for intracoastal development, resulting from erosion and deposition of sediment over its geologic history, but also enhanced and redistributed by the action of the Atlantic ocean currents along it. Since the coastline represented its national border and commerce of the time was chiefly by water, the fledgling government established a degree of national control over it. Inland transportation to supply the coasting trade at the time however, was less known and virtually undeveloped, but when new lands and their favorable river systems were added in 1787, a radically new and free national policy was established for their development and transportation use.^[1] Over time, internal improvements of natural coastal and inland waterways would develop into the Great Loop, which provides water-borne traffic circumnavigation of the eastern continental United States, using minimal ocean travel, with the Intracoastal Waterway providing its eastern and southern route.

Initial suggestions[link]

The improvement of the country's natural transportation routes was a major concern for all geographic regions as well as from a national perspective of building and binding the nation together; these improvements were also a source of major political division concerning where and how improvements should be developed, as well as who should pay, and who should do the work. In 1808, the first federal government report on existing, possible and likely avenues of transportation improvement was presented; it included much of the distance where and in the manner that the ICW now traverses the Atlantic coast. At the request of the Senate in 1807, Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatin presented an overall plan for future transportation developments of national importance and scope. Along with inland east-west improvements, Gallatin's north-south improvements included the following:^[2]

"The map of the United States will show that they possess a tide water inland navigation, secure from storms and enemies, and which, from Massachusetts to the southern extremity of Georgia, is principally, if not solely, interrupted by four necks of land. These are the Isthmus of Barnstable, that part of New Jersey which extends from the Raritan to the Delaware, the peninsula between the Delaware and the Chesapeake, and that low and marshy tract which divides the Chesapeake from Albemarle Sound. ...

Should this great work, the expense of which, as will hereafter be shown, is estimated at about three millions of dollars, be accomplished, a sea vessel entering the first canal in the harbor of Boston would, through the bay of Rhode Island, Long Island Sound, and the harbor of New York, reach Brunswick on the Raritan; thence pass through the second canal to Trenton on the Delaware, down that river to Christiana or Newcastle, and through the third canal to Elk River and the Chesapeake, whence, sailing down that bay and up Elizabeth River, it would, through the fourth canal, enter the Albemarle Sound, and by Pamlico, Core, and Bogue sounds, reach Beaufort and Swansborough in North Carolina. From the last-mentioned place, the inland navigation, through Stumpy and Toomer's sounds, is continued until a diminished draught of water, and by cutting two low and narrow necks, not exceeding three miles together, to Cape Fear River, and thence by an open but short and direct run along the coast is reached that chain of islands between which and the main the inland navigation is continued, to St, Marys along the coast of South Carolina and Georgia. It is unnecessary to add any comments on the utility of the work, in peace or war, for the transportation of merchandise or the conveyance of persons.

While Gallatin discussed the details of engineering, construction and costs, including the national benefits to accrue from lowered transportation costs between state markets and internationally, his full $20 million plan spread over ten years was never approved. That is not to say his plan was never implemented however, for with experience in the War of 1812, shortly thereafter and its attendant British blockade, the continued need for such facility was soon highlighted. Since Gallatin had based his principal proposals on the known advantageous natural geographic features of the country, many of his proposals were the locations of future navigation improvements^[3] surveyed, authorized and constructed starting with the 1824 General Survey Act and the first of many pieces of rivers and harbors legislation, as well by individual state-built improvements. Since these 1824 acts, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has had responsibility for navigation waterway improvements and maintenance. All four proposed sections of Gallatin's intracoastal plan were eventually built; the Delaware and Raritan Canal was later abandoned for a better alternative, but the Cape Cod Canal remains in operation, and the Delaware and the Dismal Swamp portions still form part of the larger present day Intracoastal Waterway.

19th-century growth[link]

Starting in 1826, Congress authorized the first survey for an inland canal between Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, and during early developments the growth of steam power to propel water, land and sea transportation. Over time, additional portions of other coastal improvements were authorized for development, including the Houston Ship Channel and the Delaware River in 1872.^[4] Following the Civil War, waterway system developments suffered as government funding moved increasingly from navigation to railroads; over time this resulted in anti-competitive pricing and acquisition practices by railroads over water transportation, but also in insufficient haulage capacity to move the required freight to the coasts. These conditions would be investigated, accompanied by considered conclusions and recommendations, as early 1873 by the "Report of Windom Select Committee" from the Senate's Select Committee on Transportation Routes to the Seaboard,^[5] but their plans and recommendations "received less attention than was anticipated, of course by reason of the rapid growth of interest in railways."^[2] While some policy corrections would be implemented over the next 30 years, continued insufficient capacity of railroad transportation would become apparent following the harvest season of 1906.^[6]

In the River and Harbors Appropriations Acts of 1882 and 1884, Congress signaled its intent to improve waterways to benefit the nation by promoting competition amongst transportation modes. The earlier act was the first act of Congress to combine appropriations for development of nation's waterways with a reaffirmation of the policy of freedom from tolls and other user charges,^[4] first stated in 1787; it was passed over President Chester Arthur's veto, who considered it wasteful spending for the government's growing federal surplus.^[7] In 1887, the Interstate Commerce Act would establish federal regulation of railroads; Congress continued to promote the policy of freedom from tolls or special taxes on waterways.^[4] In 1890 Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act, the first Federal statute to limit cartels and monopolies, but the federal government would utilize it minimally until Theodore Roosevelt's presidency more than 10 years later.

20th-century developments[link]

The invention of the diesel engine in 1892 eventually led to the conversion of fuels for transportation from coal and steam to diesel and the internal combustion engine; this would be greatly enhanced by WWI military uses and the beginning of a new age of fuel usage and consumption. The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1909 set national policy for an intracoastal waterway from Boston to the Rio Grande River,^[4] and the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1910 authorized a 9-foot x 100-foot channel on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachicola River and St. Andrew Bay, Florida, as well as a study of the most efficient means to move cargo. Between 1910 and 1914, navigation channels were deepened, and the screw propeller proved efficient for improved steering and flanking qualities.^[4] Also during this period, the Panama Canal Act was passed in 1911; it proved key to the revival of waterway transportation in the U.S, because when the the canal opened in 1914, it allowed coastal shipping to extend to the country's west coast for the first time. The law also prohibited railroads from owning, controlling, or operating a water carrier through the Canal and led to succeeding legislation that eliminated monopoly of transportation modes by railroads. The country's World War I experience demonstrated the need for bulk cargo transportation, with Congress establishing the Federal Barge Lines and spurring development of cheaper ways to transport farm commodities, including the first use of standardized freight barges.^[4]

In 1924, Congress incorporated Inland Waterways Corporation, which is generally regarded as beginning of modern water carrier operations, and in 1925 Congress authorized construction of a "Louisiana and Texas Intracoastal Waterway", as well as surveys east of New Orleans to Apalachicola Bay; this was the first legislation to treat the ICW as a continuous whole.^[4] The River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, passed by Congress, authorized the portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, using the route planned out by the Jacksonville District of the Corps Of Engineers.^[8] In 1936 the continuous 9-foot x100-foot channel was completed between Apalachicola River and New Orleans. During World War II, the need for efficient transportation of bulk materials within the continental United States was well demonstrated after German submarines sank numerous merchant ships off the East Coast. By 1942, the 9-foot x 100-foot ICW channel was completed between New Orleans and Corpus Christi.

Today, federal law provides for the waterway to be maintained at a minimum depth of 12 feet (4 m) for most of its length, but inadequate funding has prevented that.^{[citation needed]} Consequently for larger ships, shoaling or shallow waters are encountered along several sections of the waterway, with these having 7-foot (2.1-m) or 9-foot (2.7-m) minimum depths from earlier improvements. While no tolls are charged for waterway usage, commercial users have been charged a fuel tax since 1978, which is used to maintain and improve its constructed facilities. That year, the Inland Waterways Revenue Act imposed a barge fuel tax; originally set at 4 cents/gal in 1980^[9], it was gradually raised to 10 cents/gal by 1986.^[4] The act also created the Inland Waterways Trust Fund under the US Treasury to hold these funds, which are used to cover half the cost of new construction and major rehabilitation of the inland waterways infrastructure (33 U.S.C. ch.32).^[10] The later Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was a wide-ranging bill regarding all water resources utilization nationally. Concerning transportation on waterways, this law established the Inland Waterways Users Board to make recommendations regarding construction and rehabilitation priorities and spending levels for the inland waterways, and also gradually increased the incremental fuel tax to 20 cents/gal by 1995.^[4]

Current route[link]

The Intracoastal Waterway runs for most of the length of the Eastern Seaboard, from its unofficial northern terminus at the Manasquan River in New Jersey, where it connects with the Atlantic Ocean at the Manasquan Inlet, then around the Gulf of Mexico to Brownsville, Texas.

The waterway currently consists of three non-contiguous segments: the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, extending from Brownsville, Texas, east to Carrabelle, Florida; a second section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, beginning at Tarpon Springs, Florida, and extending south to Fort Myers, Florida;^[11] and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, extending from Key West, Florida, to Norfolk, Virginia (milepost 0.0). These segments were originally intended to be connected via a northern-Florida-dredged waterway from St. Marks to Tarpon Springs and the Cross Florida Barge Canal across northern Florida, but these projects were never completed due to environmental concerns. Additional canals and bays extend a navigable waterway to Boston, Massachusetts.

The Intracoastal Waterway has a good deal of commercial activity; barges haul petroleum, petroleum products, foodstuffs, building materials, and manufactured goods. It is also used extensively by recreational boaters. On the east coast, some of the traffic in fall and spring is by snowbirds who regularly move south in winter and north in summer. The waterway is also used when the ocean is too rough for travel. Numerous inlets connect the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico with the Intracoastal Waterway.

The Intracoastal Waterway connects to several navigable rivers where shipping traffic can travel to inland ports, including the Mississippi, Alabama, Savannah, James, Susquehanna, Delaware, Hudson, and Connecticut Rivers.

Natural bodies of water[link]

The following natural bodies of water are included in the Intracoastal Waterway system:

• Albemarle Sound
• Apalachicola Bay
• Barnegat Bay
• Biscayne Bay
• Bogue Sound
• Buzzards Bay
• Cape Cod Bay
• Cape Fear River
• Casco Bay
• Charleston Harbor
• Charlotte Harbor
• Chesapeake Bay
• Corpus Christi Bay
• Delaware Bay
• East River
• Elizabeth River
• Galveston Bay
• Gulf of Maine
• Halifax River
• Hampton Roads
• Laguna Madre
• Little River
• Mississippi River
• Mississippi Sound
• Mobile Bay
• Mosquito Lagoon
• Pensacola Bay
• Perdido Bay
• Indian River Lagoon
• Long Island Sound
• Pamlico Sound
• Pine Island Sound
• Port Royal Sound
• Santa Rosa Sound
• Savannah River
• Sarasota Bay
• Saint Helena Sound
• Tampa Bay
• Waccamaw River
• Wilmington River
• Winyah Bay

Canals[link]

Major freight canals[link]

• Cape Cod Canal
• Chesapeake and Delaware Ship Canal

Other canals[link]

Lewes and Rehoboth Canal in Lewes, Delaware.

• Chesapeake and Albemarle Canal
• Dismal Swamp Canal
• Cape May Canal
• Delaware and Raritan Canal-no longer operational or part of the Intracoastal Waterway
• Okeechobee Waterway
• Point Pleasant Canal
• Lewes and Rehoboth Canal

See also[link]

• Waterways along and crossings of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
• Waterways along and crossings of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
• Inland waterways of the United States

References[link]

1. ^ Northwest Ordinance, Art.4: ... "The navigable waters leading into the Mississippi and St. Lawrence, and the carrying places between the same, shall be common highways and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of the said territory as to the citizens of the United States, and those of any other States that may be admitted into the confederacy, without any tax, impost, or duty therefor."
2. ^ ^{a b} Gallatin Report (1808), portions included in the Preliminary Report of the Inland Waterways Commission and Message from the President transmitting a preliminary report], February 26, 1908.
3. ^ Carter Goodrich, The Gallatin Plan after One Hundred and Fifty Years, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 102, No. 5, (Oct. 20, 1958), pp 436-441.
4. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i} Timeline: Development of US Inland Waterways System from Coosa-Alabama River Improvement Association, Inc.
5. ^ Partly reproduced Report of Windom Select Committee (1873) in the Preliminary Report of the Inland Waterways Commission, 1908.
6. ^ Theodore Roosevelt, Message from the President transmitting the Preliminary report of the Inland Waterways Commission, February 26, 1908. "I transmit herewith a preliminary report from the Inland Waterways Commission, which was appointed by me last March in response to a widespread interest and demand from the People. The basis of this demand lay in the general and admitted inability of the railroads to handle promptly the traffic of the country, and especially the crops of the previous fall."
7. ^ Rivers and Harbors Act of 1882
8. ^ "Jacksonville District, Setting the Pace". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Divisions/Executive/Branches/CCO/DOCS/SettingThePace_DistrictOverview.pdf. Retrieved 2010-08-07. 
9. ^ "Trying to impose user fees or tolls on barge operators is uphill battle". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 2012-03-21. http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/region/trying-to-impose-user-fees-or-tolls-on-barge-operators-is-uphill-battle-627260. Retrieved 2012-05-16. 
10. ^ Ch.32
11. ^ [1] "Alperin, Lynn M., History of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, pp 48-50, National Waterways Study, U.S. Army Water Resource Support Center, Institute for Water Resources, 1983"

External links[link]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Intracoastal Waterway

• US Army Corps of Engineers – Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway information site
• History of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
• Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Association
• Gulf Intracoastal Canal Association
• Elizabeth City Area Convention & Visitors Bureau
• Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Handbook of Texas
• US Army Corps of Engineers – History of the Waterways of the Atlantic Coast of the United States
• TV.com listing for Modern Marvels episode
• Intracoastal Waterway, Encyclopædia Britannica