A three-dimensional depiction of a thickened trefoil knot, the simplest non-trivial knot

A knot diagram of the trefoil knot

In topology, knot theory is the study of mathematical knots. While inspired by knots which appear in daily life in shoelaces and rope, a mathematician's knot differs in that the ends are joined together so that it cannot be undone. In precise mathematical language, a knot is an embedding of a circle in 3-dimensional Euclidean space, R³. Two mathematical knots are equivalent if one can be transformed into the other via a deformation of R³ upon itself (known as an ambient isotopy); these transformations correspond to manipulations of a knotted string that do not involve cutting the string or passing the string through itself.

Knots can be described in various ways. Given a method of description, however, there may be more than one description that represents the same knot. For example, a common method of describing a knot is a planar diagram called a knot diagram. Any given knot can be drawn in many different ways using a knot diagram. Therefore, a fundamental problem in knot theory is determining when two descriptions represent the same knot.

A complete algorithmic solution to this problem exists, which has unknown complexity. In practice, knots are often distinguished by using a knot invariant, a "quantity" which is the same when computed from different descriptions of a knot. Important invariants include knot polynomials, knot groups, and hyperbolic invariants.

The original motivation for the founders of knot theory was to create a table of knots and links, which are knots of several components entangled with each other. Over six billion knots and links have been tabulated since the beginnings of knot theory in the 19th century.

To gain further insight, mathematicians have generalized the knot concept in several ways. Knots can be considered in other three-dimensional spaces and objects other than circles can be used; see knot (mathematics). Higher dimensional knots are n-dimensional spheres in m-dimensional Euclidean space.

The generalized Poincaré conjecture states that Every simply connected, closed n-manifold is homeomorphic to the n-sphere. Every n-dimensional knot can therefore be stretched into a trivial n-sphere. N-dimensional knots are generally not decomposable into 2-dimensional knots, though they can be projected to superpositions of lower-dimensional knots.

History[link]

Intricate Celtic knotwork in the 1200 year old Book of Kells

Archaeologists have discovered that knot tying dates back to prehistoric times. Besides their uses such as recording information and tying objects together, knots have interested humans for their aesthetics and spiritual symbolism. Knots appear in various forms of Chinese artwork dating from several centuries BC (see Chinese knotting). The endless knot appears in Tibetan Buddhism, while the Borromean rings have made repeated appearances in different cultures, often representing strength in unity. The Celtic monks who created the Book of Kells lavished entire pages with intricate Celtic knotwork.

A mathematical theory of knots was first developed in 1771 by Alexandre-Théophile Vandermonde who explicitly noted the importance of topological features when discussing the properties of knots related to the geometry of position. Mathematical studies of knots began in the 19th century with Gauss, who defined the linking integral (Silver 2006). In the 1860s, Lord Kelvin's theory that atoms were knots in the aether led to Peter Guthrie Tait's creation of the first knot tables for complete classification. Tait, in 1885, published a table of knots with up to ten crossings know as the Tait conjectures. This record motivated the early knot theorists, but knot theory eventually became part of the emerging subject of topology.

These topologists in the early part of the 20th century—Max Dehn, J. W. Alexander, and others—studied knots from the point of view of the knot group and invariants from homology theory such as the Alexander polynomial. This would be the main approach to knot theory until a series of breakthroughs transformed the subject.

The first knot tabulator, Peter Guthrie Tait

In the late 1970s, William Thurston introduced hyperbolic geometry into the study of knots with the hyperbolization theorem. Many knots were shown to be hyperbolic knots, enabling the use of geometry in defining new, powerful knot invariants. The discovery of the Jones polynomial by Vaughan Jones in 1984 (Sossinsky 2002, pp. 71–89), and subsequent contributions from Edward Witten, Maxim Kontsevich, and others, revealed deep connections between knot theory and mathematical methods in statistical mechanics and quantum field theory. A plethora of knot invariants have been invented since then, utilizing sophisticated tools such as quantum groups and Floer homology.

In the last several decades of the 20th century, scientists became interested in studying physical knots in order to understand knotting phenomena in DNA and other polymers. Knot theory can be used to determine if a molecule is chiral (has a "handedness") or not (Simon 1986). Tangles, strings with both ends fixed in place, have been effectively used in studying the action of topoisomerase on DNA (Flapan 2000). Knot theory may be crucial in the construction of quantum computers, through the model of topological quantum computation (Collins 2006).

Knot equivalence[link]

On the left, the unknot, and a knot equivalent to it. It can be more difficult to determine whether complex knots, such as the one on the right, are equivalent to the unknot.

A knot is created by beginning with a one-dimensional line segment, wrapping it around itself arbitrarily, and then fusing its two free ends together to form a closed loop (Adams 2004)(Sossinsky 2002). When topologists consider knots and other entanglements such as links and braids, they consider the space surrounding the knot as a viscous fluid. If the knot can be pushed about smoothly in the fluid, without intersecting itself, to coincide with another knot, the two knots are considered equivalent. The idea of knot equivalence is to give a precise definition of when two knots should be considered the same even when positioned quite differently in space. A formal mathematical definition is that two knots are equivalent if one can be transformed into the other via a type of deformation of R³ upon itself, known as an ambient isotopy.

The basic problem of knot theory, the recognition problem, is determining the equivalence of two knots. Algorithms exist to solve this problem, with the first given by Wolfgang Haken in the late 1960s (Hass 1998). Nonetheless, these algorithms can be extremely time-consuming, and a major issue in the theory is to understand how hard this problem really is (Hass 1998). The special case of recognizing the unknot, called the unknotting problem, is of particular interest (Hoste 2005).

Knot diagrams[link]

A useful way to visualise and manipulate knots is to project the knot onto a plane—think of the knot casting a shadow on the wall. A small change in the direction of projection will ensure that it is one-to-one except at the double points, called crossings, where the "shadow" of the knot crosses itself once transversely (Rolfsen 1976). At each crossing, to be able to recreate the original knot, the over-strand must be distinguished from the under-strand. This is often done by creating a break in the strand going underneath. The resulting diagram is an immersed plane curve with the additional data of which strand is over and which is under at each crossing. Analogously, knotted surfaces in 4-space can be related to immersed surfaces in 3-space.

Reidemeister moves[link]

In 1927, working with this diagrammatic form of knots, J.W. Alexander and G. B. Briggs, and independently Kurt Reidemeister, demonstrated that two knot diagrams belonging to the same knot can be related by a sequence of three kinds of moves on the diagram, shown below. These operations, now called the Reidemeister moves, are:

1. Twist and untwist in either direction.
2. Move one strand completely over another.
3. Move a strand completely over or under a crossing.

Reidemeister moves

Type I	Type II
Type III

The proof that diagrams of equivalent knots are connected by Reidemeister moves relies on an analysis of what happens under the planar projection of the movement taking one knot to another. The movement can be arranged so that almost all of the time the projection will be a knot diagram, except at finitely many times when an "event" or "catastrophe" occurs, such as when more than two strands cross at a point or multiple strands become tangent at a point. A close inspection will show that complicated events can be eliminated, leaving only the simplest events: (1) a "kink" forming or being straightened out; (2) two strands becoming tangent at a point and passing through; and (3) three strands crossing at a point. These are precisely the Reidemeister moves (Sossinsky 2002, ch. 3) (Lickorish 1997, ch. 1).

Knot invariants[link]

A knot invariant is a "quantity" that is the same for equivalent knots (Adams 2004)(Lickorish 1997)(Rolfsen 1976). For example, if the invariant is computed from a knot diagram, it should give the same value for two knot diagrams representing equivalent knots. An invariant may take the same value on two different knots, so by itself may be incapable of distinguishing all knots. An elementary invariant is tricolorability.

"Classical" knot invariants include the knot group, which is the fundamental group of the knot complement, and the Alexander polynomial, which can be computed from the Alexander invariant, a module constructed from the infinite cyclic cover of the knot complement (Lickorish 1997)(Rolfsen 1976). In the late 20th century, invariants such as "quantum" knot polynomials, Vassiliev invariants and hyperbolic invariants were discovered. These aforementioned invariants are only the tip of the iceberg of modern knot theory.

Knot polynomials[link]

A knot polynomial is a knot invariant that is a polynomial. Well-known examples include the Jones and Alexander polynomials. A variant of the Alexander polynomial, the Alexander–Conway polynomial, is a polynomial in the variable z with integer coefficients (Lickorish 1997).

The Alexander–Conway polynomial is actually defined in terms of links, which consist of one or more knots entangled with each other. The concepts explained above for knots, e.g. diagrams and Reidemeister moves, also hold for links.

Consider an oriented link diagram, i.e. one in which every component of the link has a preferred direction indicated by an arrow. For a given crossing of the diagram, let Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): L_+, L_-, L_0

be the oriented link diagrams resulting from changing the diagram as indicated in the figure:

Note that the original diagram might be either Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): L_+

or Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): L_-

, depending on the chosen crossing's configuration. Then the Alexander–Conway polynomial, C(z), is recursively defined according to the rules:

• C(O) = 1 (where O is any diagram of the unknot)
• Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): C(L_+) = C(L_-) + z C(L_0).

The second rule is what is often referred to as a skein relation. To check that these rules give an invariant of an oriented link, one should determine that the polynomial does not change under the three Reidemeister moves. Many important knot polynomials can be defined in this way.

The following is an example of a typical computation using a skein relation. It computes the Alexander–Conway polynomial of the trefoil knot. The yellow patches indicate where the relation is applied.

C() = C() + z C()

gives the unknot and the Hopf link. Applying the relation to the Hopf link where indicated,

C() = C() + z C()

gives a link deformable to one with 0 crossings (it is actually the unlink of two components) and an unknot. The unlink takes a bit of sneakiness:

C() = C() + z C()

which implies that C(unlink of two components) = 0, since the first two polynomials are of the unknot and thus equal.

Putting all this together will show:

C(trefoil) = 1 + z (0 + z) = 1 + z².

Since the Alexander–Conway polynomial is a knot invariant, this shows that the trefoil is not equivalent to the unknot. So the trefoil really is "knotted".

• 

  The left handed trefoil knot.

• 

  The right handed trefoil knot.

Actually, there are two trefoil knots, called the right and left-handed trefoils, which are mirror images of each other (take a diagram of the trefoil given above and change each crossing to the other way to get the mirror image). These are not equivalent to each other, meaning that they are not amphicheiral. This was shown by Max Dehn, before the invention of knot polynomials, using group theoretical methods (Dehn 1914). But the Alexander–Conway polynomial of each kind of trefoil will be the same, as can be seen by going through the computation above with the mirror image. The Jones polynomial can in fact distinguish between the left and right-handed trefoil knots (Lickorish 1997).

Hyperbolic invariants[link]

William Thurston proved many knots are hyperbolic knots, meaning that the knot complement, i.e. the set of points of 3-space not on the knot, admits a geometric structure, in particular that of hyperbolic geometry. The hyperbolic structure depends only on the knot so any quantity computed from the hyperbolic structure is then a knot invariant (Adams 2004).

Geometry lets us visualize what the inside of a knot or link complement looks like by imagining light rays as traveling along the geodesics of the geometry. An example is provided by the picture of the complement of the Borromean rings. The inhabitant of this link complement is viewing the space from near the red component. The balls in the picture are views of horoball neighborhoods of the link. By thickening the link in a standard way, the horoball neighborhoods of the link components are obtained. Even though the boundary of a neighborhood is a torus, when viewed from inside the link complement, it looks like a sphere. Each link component shows up as infinitely many spheres (of one color) as there are infinitely many light rays from the observer to the link component. The fundamental parallelogram (which is indicated in the picture), tiles both vertically and horizontally and shows how to extend the pattern of spheres infinitely.

This pattern, the horoball pattern, is itself a useful invariant. Other hyperbolic invariants include the shape of the fundamental paralleogram, length of shortest geodesic, and volume. Modern knot and link tabulation efforts have utilized these invariants effectively. Fast computers and clever methods of obtaining these invariants make calculating these invariants, in practice, a simple task (Adams, Hildebrand & Weeks 1991).

Higher dimensions[link]

A knot in three dimensions can be untied when placed in four dimensional space. This is done by changing crossings. Suppose one strand is behind another as seen from a chosen point. Lift it into the fourth dimension, so there is no obstacle (the front strand having no component there); then slide it forward, and drop it back, now in front. Analogies for the plane would be lifting a string up off the surface, or removing a dot from inside a circle.

In fact, in four dimensions, any non-intersecting closed loop of one-dimensional string is equivalent to an unknot. First "push" the loop into a three-dimensional subspace, which is always possible, though technical to explain.

Knotting spheres of higher dimension[link]

Since a knot can be considered topologically a 1-dimensional sphere, the next generalization is to consider a two dimensional sphere embedded in a four dimensional ball. Such an embedding is unknotted if there is a homeomorphism of the 4-sphere onto itself taking the 2-sphere to a standard "round" 2-sphere. Suspended knots and spun knots are two typical families of such 2-sphere knots.

The mathematical technique called "general position" implies that for a given n-sphere in the m-sphere, if m is large enough (depending on n), the sphere should be unknotted. In general, piecewise-linear n-spheres form knots only in (n+2)-space (Zeeman 1963), although this is no longer a requirement for smoothly knotted spheres. In fact, there are smoothly knotted 4k-1-spheres in 6k-space, e.g. there is a smoothly knotted 3-sphere in the 6-sphere (Haefliger 1962)(Levine 1965). Thus the codimension of a smooth knot can be arbitrarily large when not fixing the dimension of the knotted sphere; however, any smooth k-sphere in an n-sphere with 2n-3k-3 > 0 is unknotted. The notion of a knot has further generalisations in mathematics, see: knot (mathematics), isotopy classification of embeddings.

Every knot in Sⁿ is the link of a real-algebraic set with isolated singularity in Rⁿ⁺¹ (Akbulut & King 1981).

Adding knots[link]

Adding two knots

Two knots can be added by cutting both knots and joining the pairs of ends. The operation is called the knot sum, or sometimes the connected sum or composition of two knots. This can be formally defined as follows (Adams 2004): consider a planar projection of each knot and suppose these projections are disjoint. Find a rectangle in the plane where one pair of opposite sides are arcs along each knot while the rest of the rectangle is disjoint from the knots. Form a new knot by deleting the first pair of opposite sides and adjoining the other pair of opposite sides. The resulting knot is a sum of the original knots. Depending on how this is done, two different knots (but no more) may result. This ambiguity in the sum can be eliminated regarding the knots as oriented, i.e. having a preferred direction of travel along the knot, and requiring the arcs of the knots in the sum are oriented consistently with the oriented boundary of the rectangle.

The knot sum of oriented knots is commutative and associative. A knot is prime if it is non-trivial and cannot be written as the knot sum of two non-trivial knots. A knot that can be written as such a sum is composite. There is a prime decomposition for knots, analogous to prime and composite numbers (Schubert 1949). For oriented knots, this decomposition is also unique. Higher dimensional knots can also be added but there are some differences. While you cannot form the unknot in three dimensions by adding two non-trivial knots, you can in higher dimensions, at least when one considers smooth knots in codimension at least 3.

Tabulating knots[link]

A table of prime knots up to seven crossings. The knots are labeled with Alexander–Briggs notation

Traditionally, knots have been catalogued in terms of crossing number. Knot tables generally include only prime knots and only one entry for a knot and its mirror image (even if they are different) (Hoste, Thistlethwaite & Weeks 1998). The number of nontrivial knots of a given crossing number increases rapidly, making tabulation computationally difficult (Hoste 2005, p. 20). Tabulation efforts have succeeded in enumerating over 6 billion knots and links (Hoste 2005, p. 28). The sequence of the number of prime knots of a given crossing number, up to crossing number 16, is 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 7, 21, 49, 165, 552, 2176, 9988, 46972, 253293, 1388705... (sequence A002863 in OEIS). While exponential upper and lower bounds for this sequence are known, it has not been proven that this sequence is strictly increasing (Adams 2004).

The first knot tables by Tait, Little, and Kirkman used knot diagrams, although Tait also used a precursor to the Dowker notation. Different notations have been invented for knots which allow more efficient tabulation (Hoste 2005).

The early tables attempted to list all knots of at most 10 crossings, and all alternating knots of 11 crossings (Hoste, Thistlethwaite & Weeks 1998). The development of knot theory due to Alexander, Reidemeister, Seifert, and others eased the task of verification and tables of knots up to and including 9 crossings were published by Alexander–Briggs and Reidemeister in the late 1920s.

The first major verification of this work was done in the 1960s by John Horton Conway, who not only developed a new notation but also the Alexander–Conway polynomial (Conway 1970)(Doll & Hoste 1991). This verified the list of knots of at most 11 crossings and a new list of links up to 10 crossings. Conway found a number of omissions but only one duplication in the Tait–Little tables; however he missed the duplicates called the Perko pair, which would only be noticed in 1974 by Kenneth Perko (Perko 1974). This famous error would propagate when Dale Rolfsen added a knot table in his influential text, based on Conway's work.

In the late 1990s Hoste, Thistlethwaite, and Weeks tabulated all the knots through 16 crossings (Hoste, Thistlethwaite & Weeks 1998). In 2003 Rankin, Flint, and Schermann, tabulated the alternating knots through 22 crossings (Hoste 2005).

Alexander–Briggs notation[link]

This is the most traditional notation, due to the 1927 paper of J. W. Alexander and G. Briggs and later extended by Dale Rolfsen in his knot table. The notation simply organizes knots by their crossing number. One writes the crossing number with a subscript to denote its order amongst all knots with that crossing number. This order is arbitrary and so has no special significance.

Dowker notation[link]

A knot diagram with crossings labelled for a Dowker sequence

The Dowker notation, also called the Dowker–Thistlethwaite notation or code, for a knot is a finite sequence of even integers. The numbers are generated by following the knot and marking the crossings with consecutive integers. Since each crossing is visited twice, this creates a pairing of even integers with odd integers. An appropriate sign is given to indicate over and undercrossing. For example, in the figure the knot diagram has crossings labelled with the pairs (1,6) (3,−12) (5,2) (7,8) (9,−4) and (11,−10). The Dowker notation for this labelling is the sequence: 6 −12 2 8 −4 −10. A knot diagram has more than one possible Dowker notation, and there is a well-understood ambiguity when reconstructing a knot from a Dowker notation.

Conway notation[link]

The Conway notation for knots and links, named after John Horton Conway, is based on the theory of tangles (Conway 1970). The advantage of this notation is that it reflects some properties of the knot or link.

The notation describes how to construct a particular link diagram of the link. Start with a basic polyhedron, a 4-valent connected planar graph with no digon regions. Such a polyhedron is denoted first by the number of vertices then a number of asterisks which determine the polyhedron's position on a list of basic polyhedron. For example, 10** denotes the second 10-vertex polyhedron on Conway's list.

Each vertex then has an algebraic tangle substituted into it (each vertex is oriented so there is no arbitrary choice in substitution). Each such tangle has a notation consisting of numbers and + or − signs.

An example is 1*2 −3 2. The 1* denotes the only 1-vertex basic polyhedron. The 2 −3 2 is a sequence describing the continued fraction associated to a rational tangle. One inserts this tangle at the vertex of the basic polyhedron 1*.

A more complicated example is 8*3.1.2 0.1.1.1.1.1 Here again 8* refers to a basic polyhedron with 8 vertices. The periods separate the notation for each tangle.

Any link admits such a description, and it is clear this is a very compact notation even for very large crossing number. There are some further shorthands usually used. The last example is usually written 8*3:2 0, where the ones are omitted and kept the number of dots excepting the dots at the end. For an algebraic knot such as in the first example, 1* is often omitted.

Conway's pioneering paper on the subject lists up to 10-vertex basic polyhedra of which he uses to tabulate links, which have become standard for those links. For a further listing of higher vertex polyhedra, there are nonstandard choices available.

See also[link]

• Contact geometry#Legendrian submanifolds and knots
• Knots and graphs
• List of knot theory topics
• Molecular knot
• Quantum topology
• Ribbon Theory
• Classification of embeddings.

References[link]

• Adams, Colin (2004), The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots, American Mathematical Society, ISBN 0-8218-3678-1 
• Adams, Colin; Hildebrand, Martin; Weeks, Jeffrey (1991), "Hyperbolic invariants of knots and links", Transactions of the American Mathemathical Society (Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 326, No. 1) 326 (1): 1–56, DOI:10.2307/2001854, JSTOR 2001854 
• Akbulut, Selman; King, Henry C. (1981), "All knots are algebraic", Comm. Math. Helv. 56 (3): 339–351 
• Bar-Natan, Dror (1995), "On the Vassiliev knot invariants", Topology 34 (2): 423–472, DOI:10.1016/0040-9383(95)93237-2 
• Collins, Graham (April 2006), "Computing with Quantum Knots", Scientific American 
• Conway, John (1970), "An enumeration of knots and links, and some of their algebraic properties", Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1967, Pergamon, pp. 329–358 
• Doll, Helmut; Hoste, Jim (1991), "A tabulation of oriented links. With microfiche supplement", Math. Comp. 57 (196): 747–761 
• Flapan, Erica (2000), "When topology meets chemistry: A topological look at molecular chirality", Outlooks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC), ISBN 0-521-66254-0 
• Haefliger, André (1962), "Knotted (4k − 1)-spheres in 6k-space", Annals of Mathematics (2) (The Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 75, No. 3) 75 (3): 452–466, DOI:10.2307/1970208, JSTOR 1970208 
• Hass, Joel (1998), "Algorithms for recognizing knots and 3-manifolds", Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (Elsevier) 9 (4–5): 569–581, arXiv:math/9712269, DOI:10.1016/S0960-0779(97)00109-4 
• Hoste, Jim; Thistlethwaite, Morwen; Weeks, Jeffrey (1998), "The first 1,701,935 knots", Math. Intelligencer (Springer) 20 (4): 33–48, DOI:10.1007/BF03025227 
• Hoste, Jim (2005), "The enumeration and classification of knots and links", Handbook of Knot Theory, Amsterdam: Elsevier, http://pzacad.pitzer.edu/~jhoste/HosteWebPages/downloads/Enumeration.pdf 
• Levine, Jerome (1965), "A classification of differentiable knots", Annals of Mathematics (2) 1982: 15–50 
• Kontsevich, Maxim (1993), "Vassiliev's knot invariants", I. M. Gelfand Seminar, Adv. Soviet Math. (Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.) 16: 137–150 
• Lickorish, W. B. Raymond (1997), An Introduction to Knot Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-98254-X 
• Perko, Kenneth (1974), "On the classification of knots", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 45, No. 2) 45 (2): 262–266, DOI:10.2307/2040074, JSTOR 2040074 
• Rolfsen, Dale (1976), Knots and Links, Publish or Perish, ISBN 0-914098-16-0 
• Schubert, Horst (1949), "Die eindeutige Zerlegbarkeit eines Knotens in Primknoten", Heidelberger Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. (3): 57–104 
• Silver, Dan (2006), "Knot theory's odd origins", American Scientist 94 (2): 158–165, http://www.southalabama.edu/mathstat/personal_pages/silver/scottish.pdf 
• Simon, Jonathan (1986), "Topological chirality of certain molecules", Topology 25 (2): 229–235, DOI:10.1016/0040-9383(86)90041-8 
• Sossinsky, Alexei (2002), Knots, mathematics with a twist, Harvard University Press, ISBN 0-674-00944-4 
• Turaev, V. G. (1994), "Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds", De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.) 18, ISBN 3-11-013704-6 
• Witten, Edward (1989), "Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial", Comm. Math. Phys. 121 (3): 351–399, Bibcode 1989CMaPh.121..351W, DOI:10.1007/BF01217730 
• Zeeman, E. C. (1963), "Unknotting combinatorial balls", Annals of Mathematics (2) (The Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 78, No. 3) 78 (3): 501–526, DOI:10.2307/1970538, JSTOR 1970538 

Further reading[link]

Introductory textbooks[link]

There are a number of introductions to knot theory. A classical introduction for graduate students or advanced undergraduates is Rolfsen (1976), given in the references. Other good texts from the references are Adams (2001) and Lickorish (1997). Adams is informal and accessible for the most part to high schoolers. Lickorish is a rigorous introduction for graduate students, covering a nice mix of classical and modern topics.

• Richard H. Crowell and Ralph Fox, Introduction to Knot Theory, 1977, ISBN 0-387-90272-4
• Gerhard Burde and Heiner Zieschang, Knots, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 1985, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 3-11-008675-1
• Louis H. Kauffman, On Knots, 1987, ISBN 0-691-08435-1

Surveys[link]

• William W. Menasco and Morwen Thistlethwaite (editors), Handbook of Knot Theory, Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005. ISBN 0-444-51452-X
  • Menasco and Thistlethwaite's handbook surveys a mix of topics relevant to current research trends in a manner accessible to advanced undergraduates but of interest to professional researchers.
• Livio, Mario, Is God a Mathematician?, Simon & Schuster, 2009, pp. 203–218 ISBN 978-0-7432-9405-8

External links[link]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Knot theory

Look up knot theory in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

History[link]

• Thomson, Sir William (Lord Kelvin), On Vortex Atoms, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. VI, 1867, pp. 94–105.
• Silliman, Robert H., William Thomson: Smoke Rings and Nineteenth-Century Atomism, Isis, Vol. 54, No. 4. (Dec., 1963), pp. 461–474. JSTOR link
• Movie of a modern recreation of Tait's smoke ring experiment
• History of knot theory (on the home page of Andrew Ranicki)

Knot tables and software[link]

• KnotInfo: Table of Knot Invariants and Knot Theory Resources
• The wiki Knot Atlas – detailed info on individual knots in knot tables
• KnotPlot – software to investigate geometric properties of knots

Some knots

1. Yarn knot ABoK #2688
2. Manrope knot
3. Granny knot
4. Rosebud stopper knot (?)
5. Matthew Walker's knot
6. Shroud knot
7. Turks head knot
8. Overhand knot, Figure-of-eight knot
9. Reef knot, Square knot
10. Two half hitches

A knot is a method of fastening or securing linear material such as rope by tying or interweaving. It may consist of a length of one or several segments of rope, string, webbing, twine, strap, or even chain interwoven such that the line can bind to itself or to some other object—the "load". Knots have been the subject of interest for their ancient origins, their common uses, and the area of mathematics known as knot theory.

Use[link]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2011)

There is a large variety of knots, each with properties that make it suitable for a range of tasks. Some knots are used to attach the rope (or other knotting material) to other objects such as another rope, cleat, ring, or stake. Some knots are used to bind or constrict objects. Decorative knots usually bind to themselves to produce attractive patterns.

Teaching[link]

Sailors learning knots and ropework in the early 20th century

While some people can look at diagrams or photos and tie the illustrated knots, others learn best by watching how a knot is tied. Knot tying skills are often transmitted by sailors, scouts, climbers, cavers, arborists, rescue professionals, fishermen, linemen and surgeons.

Applications[link]

Truckers in need of securing a load may use a trucker's hitch, gaining mechanical advantage. Knots can save a spelunker from finding himself buried under rock. Many knots can also be used as makeshift tools, for example, the Bowline can be used as a rescue loop, and the Munter hitch can be used as a belay. The Diamond hitch was widely used to tie packages on to donkeys and mules.

In hazardous environments such as mountains, knots are very important. In the event of someone falling into a ravine or a similar terrain feature, with a rope or two, some carabineers, and knowledge of knots you can set up a rappel system to lower yourself down to the individual and set up a hauling system to allow another individual to pull you and the injured person out of the ravine. Further application of knots includes developing a high line, which is basically equivalent to a zip line. Using the high line you can move supplies, injured people, or those lacking training in rappelling and rock climbing across a river or a large crevice or ravine. Note the systems mentioned typically require carabineers and the use of multiple useful knots. These knots include the bowline, double figure eight, munter hitch, munter mule, prusik, autoblock, and clove hitch. Thus any individual who goes into a mountainous environment should have basic knowledge of knots and knot systems to increase safety and the ability to do interesting activities such as rappelling.

Knots can be applied in combination to produce complex objects such as lanyards and netting. In ropework, the frayed end of a rope is held together by a type of knot called a whipping knot. Many types of textiles use knots to repair damage. Macrame, one kind of textile, is generated exclusively through the use of knotting, instead of knits, crochets, weaves or felting. Macramé can produce self-supporting three dimensional textile structures, as well as flat work, and is often used ornamentally or decoratively.

Properties[link]

Strength[link]

Knots weaken the rope in which they are made.^[1] When knotted rope is strained to its breaking point, it almost always fails at the knot or close to it, unless it is defective or damaged elsewhere. The bending, crushing, and chafing forces that hold a knot in place also unevenly stress rope fibers and ultimately lead to a reduction in strength. The exact mechanisms that cause the weakening and failure are complex and are the subject of continued study.

Relative knot strength, also called knot efficiency, is the breaking strength of a knotted rope in proportion to the breaking strength of the rope without the knot. Determining a precise value for a particular knot is difficult because many factors can affect a knot efficiency test: the type of fiber, the style of rope, the size of rope, whether it is wet or dry, how the knot is dressed before loading, how rapidly it is loaded, whether the knot is repeatedly loaded, and so on. The efficiency of common knots ranges between 40—80% of the rope's original strength.^[2]

In most situations forming loops and bends with conventional knots is far more practical than using rope splices, even though the latter can nearly maintain the rope's full strength. Prudent users allow for a large safety margin in the strength of rope chosen for a task due to the weakening effects of knots, aging, damage, shock loading, etc. The working load limit of a rope is generally specified with a significant safety factor, up to 15:1 for critical applications.^[3] For life-threatening applications, other factors come into play.

Security[link]

Even if the rope does not break, a knot may still fail to hold. Knots that hold firm under a variety of adverse conditions are said to be more secure than those that do not. The main ways knots fail to hold are:

Slipping[link]

The load creates tension that pulls the rope back through the knot in the direction of the load. If this continues far enough, the working end passes into the knot and the knot unravels and fails. This behavior can worsen when the knot is repeatedly strained and let slack, dragged over rough terrain, or repeatedly struck against hard objects such as a masts and flagpoles.

Even with secure knots, slippage may occur when the knot is first put under real tension. This can be mitigated by leaving plenty of rope at the working end outside of the knot, and by dressing the knot cleanly and tightening it as much as possible before loading. Sometimes, the use of a stopper knot or, even better, a backup knot can prevent the working end from passing through the knot; but if a knot is observed to slip, it is generally preferable to use a more secure knot. Life-critical applications often require backup knots to maximize safety.

Capsizing[link]

Bowline

Capsizing (or spilling) a knot refers to changing a knot's form and rearranging its parts, usually by pulling on specific ends in certain ways.^[2] When used inappropriately, some knots tend to capsize easily or even spontaneously. Often the capsized form of the knot offers little resistance to slipping or unraveling. A Reef Knot, when misused as a bend, can capsize dangerously.

Sometimes a knot is intentionally capsized as a method of tying another knot, as with the "lightning method" of tying a Bowline. Some knots, such as the Carrick Bend, are generally tied in one form then capsized to obtain a stronger or more stable form.

Sliding[link]

In knots that are meant to grip other objects, failure can be defined as the knot moving relative to the gripped object. While the knot itself does not fail, it ceases to perform the desired function. For instance, a simple Rolling Hitch tied around a railing and pulled parallel to the railing might hold up to a certain tension, then start sliding. Sometimes this problem can be corrected by working-up the knot tighter before subjecting it to load, but usually the problem requires either a knot with more wraps or a rope of different diameter or material.

Releasability[link]

Knots differ in the effort required to untie them after loading. Knots that are very difficult to untie, such as the water knot, are said to "jam". Knots that come untied with less difficulty, such as the Zeppelin bend, are referred to as "non-jamming".

Components[link]

Knot components

A	Turn
B	Round turn
C	Two round turns

[edit] Bight

Any curved section, slack part, or loop between the ends of a rope, string, or yarn

Bitter end[link]

More a ropeworker's term than a knot term, it refers to the end of a rope that is tied off, hence the expression "hanging on to the bitter end".^{[citation needed]} A bitt is a metal block with a crosspin used for tying lines to, found on piers. In fact the bitter end is the end of the anchor "cable" that connects to the anchor bitts in the cable locker under the forecastle or poop using the bitter pin. (British nautical usage). Other uses may be borrowed from this derivation.

Loop[link]

A full circle formed by passing the working end over itself

Elbow[link]

Two crossing points created by an extra twist in a loop

Standing end[link]

The standing end is the longer end of the rope not involved in the knot, often shown as unfinished. It is often (but not always) the end of the rope under load after the knot is complete. For example, when a clove hitch ties a boat to a pier, the end going to the boat is the standing end.

Standing part[link]

Section of line between knot and the standing end (seen above)

[edit] Turn

A turn or single turn is a single pass behind or through an object.

A round turn is the complete encirclement of an object; requires two passes.

Two round turns circles the object twice; requires three passes.

Working end[link]

The active end of a line used in making the knot. May also be called the 'running end', 'live end', or 'tag end'.

Working part[link]

Section of line between knot and the working end

Categories[link]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2011)

Further information: List of knot terminology

The list of knots is extensive, but common properties allow for a useful system of categorization. For example, loop knots share the attribute of having some kind of an anchor point constructed on the standing end (such as a loop or overhand knot) into which the working end is easily hitched to using a round turn. An example of this is the bowline. Constricting knots often rely on friction to cinch down tight on loose bundles; an example is the Miller's knot. Knots may belong to more than one category.

Bend 

A knot uniting two lines (for knots joining two ends of the same line, see binding knots or loops). List of bends.

Binding 

A knot that restricts object(s) by making multiple winds. List of binding knots.

Coil 

Knots used to tie up lines for storage. Another handy coil is here.

Decorative knot 

A complex knot exhibiting repeating patterns often constructed around and enhancing an object. List of decorative knots.

Hitch 

A knot tied to a post, cable, ring, or spar. List of hitch knots.

Lashing 

A knot used to hold (usually) poles together. List of lashing knots.

Loop 

A knot used to create a closed circle in a line. List of loop knots.

Plait (or braid)

A number of lines interwoven in a simple regular pattern. List of plait knots.

Slip (or running) 

A knot tied with a hitch around one of its parts. In contrast, a loop is closed with a bend. While a slip knot can be closed, a loop remains the same size. List of slip knots.

Slipped 

Some knots may be finished by passing a bight rather than the end, for ease of untying. The common shoelace knot is an example, being a reef knot with both ends slipped.

Seizing 

A knot used to hold two lines or two parts of the same line together. List of seizing knots.

Sennit 

A number of lines interwoven in a complex pattern. See also Chain sinnet.

Splice 

A knot formed by interweaving strands of rope rather than whole lines. More time-consuming but usually stronger than simple knots. List of splices.

Stopper 

A knot tied to hold a line through a hole.

Trick 

A knot that is used as part of a magic trick, a joke, or a puzzle. List of trick knots.

Whipping 

A binding knot used to prevent another line from fraying.

Basic useful knots[link]

• Alpine butterfly knot for a secure loop in the middle of a rope when the ends aren't free
• Bowline for tying a loop in the end of a rope, as around one's waist or to secure a ring or grommet. The knot is also used as an anchor knot and is used in many knot systems that are used in mountainous terrain such as a highline or hauling system.
• Constrictor knot for making bundles or cinching the neck of a sack
• Figure-of-eight knot as a stopper
• Monkey's fist used to haul a heavier rope
• Prusik for ascending a rope
• Sheet bend for joining the ends of two ropes, which need not be the same diameter
• Double sheet bend for tying the ends of two dissimilarly sized ropes together
• Spanish bowline Used to hoist crewmen aloft or suspend them over the side
• Square knot, a binding knot for joining the ends of a piece of cordage wrapped around an object or objects
• Versatackle hoist heavy loads and tighten rigging
• Water knot for tying a knot in flat material such as nylon webbing

Hitches[link]

• Buntline hitch for tying a rope to a pole
• Diamond hitch for packing trail animals
• Midshipman's Hitch (also known as a Taut-line Hitch, below)
• Rolling hitch for securing a rope to a pole, or one rope to the middle of another
• Taut-line hitch for forming an adjustable loop that keeps its size under tension
• Timber hitch for securing or hauling long narrow loads
• Trucker's hitch for clinching down a load

Knot theory[link]

A trefoil knot is a mathematical version of an overhand knot.

Knot theory is a branch of topology. It deals with the mathematical analysis of knots, their structure and properties, and with the relationships between different knots. In topology, a knot is a figure consisting of a single loop, abstracted from any physical rope or line, with any number of crossing or "knotted" elements. As such, it has no proper ends, and cannot be undone or untied. Various mathematical techniques are used to classify and distinguish knots. For instance, the Alexander polynomial can be used to distinguish the trefoil knot from the figure-eight knot and the unknot (a simple loop).^{[citation needed]}

See also[link]

• Chinese knotting
• List of decorative knots
• List of knots
• List of knot terminology
• Knot (mathematics)
• Quipu
• Round turn and two half-hitches

References[link]

Footnotes[link]

Notations[link]

• Clifford W. Ashley. The Ashley Book of Knots. Doubleday, New York. ISBN 0-385-04025-3
• Geoffrey Budworth (1999). The Ultimate Encyclopedia of Knots & Ropework. Annes Publishing Limited. ISBN 1-55267-986-1
• John Cassidy (1985). The Klutz Book of Knots. Klutz Press, Palo Alto, California. ISBN 0-932592-10-4
• Cyrus L. Day. Knots & Splices. International Marine/McGraw-Hill Companies. ISBN 0-87742-252-4
• Raoul Graumont. Handbook of Knots. Cornell Maritime Press/Tidewater Publishers. ISBN 0-87033-030-6
• R.S. Lee. All The Knots You Need. Algrove Publishing. ISBN 0-921335-47-4
• Allen Padgett and Bruce Smith. On Rope. National Speleological Society. ISBN 0-9615093-2-5
• Des Pawson (2001). Pocket Guide to Knots & Splices. Produced for Propsero Books by RPC Publishing Ltd., London. ISBN 1-55267-218-2
• Brion Toss. The Complete Rigger's Apprentice. International Marine/McGraw-Hill Companies. ISBN 0-07-064840-9
• J.C. Turner and P. van de Griend (ed.) (1996). History and Science of Knots. World Scientific. ISBN 981-02-2469-9

External links[link]

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of Simplified list of knots

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Knots

• Knots at the Open Directory Project
• The short film Knots, Bends And Hitches (1973) is available for free download at the Internet Archive [more]
• Over 350 Knot Videos - videos are demonstrating animated knots tying