2:12
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FaMWxLCGY0U/0.jpg)
Gallium Induced Structural Failure of a Coke Can
Gallium Induced Structural Failure of a Coke Can
We show how a normally strong and robust coke can is turned into the equivalent of wet tissue paper with gallium. If you want some gallium yourself, you can order it from galliumsource.com Be sure to use the coupon code "nurdrage" to get a 5% discount on all products.
13:06
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QZKvfHZb-Q0/0.jpg)
Pilot-1 PA-12 Super Cub tail camera & in-flight structural failure at SCCMAS
Pilot-1 PA-12 Super Cub tail camera & in-flight structural failure at SCCMAS
Pilot-1 PA-12 Super Cub with a Zenoah G26 Gas engine on the business end:-) The large gas tank lets me fly for 28 mins. J-3 cub tail camera & in-flight structural failure at SCCMAS
6:00
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5QMSAsOkumI/0.jpg)
(Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
(Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
(Part 2): www.youtube.com The mathematical formulas used here are not the proper way for obtaining a real figure but they are based on assumptions in order to obtain a value fore the absolute minimum time needed for the collapse process. the Assumptions are: * That the intact structure below the impact zone will not arrest the falling structure above it and will allow it to continue the collapse. * That the intact structure below the impact zone will behave like a fluid allowing the falling structure above it to flow through it but only providing it with an average resistance force equal to the weight above the crumbling zone at any instant... (this is a reasonable assumption because the structure is designed to support the static load of the weight above it at any point throughout the length of the building so it will provide at least that force before it gives up or breaks) obviosly the real resistance force from the intact structure below will be alot more until it passes the elastic region and the plastic deformation then fructure but this calculation can give us the absolute minimum time needed. The proper way to do this is to use strain energy methods and you will find that the collapse will be arrested and not allowed to continue. 911 WTC twin towers New York USA Bin laden freefall speed controlled demolition structural failures melting steel pancake theory crushing crippling buckling shear failure speed of fall projectile reopen911.org 911 truth movement WTC 9/11 <b>...</b>
8:21
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ecmQegzMJQE/0.jpg)
(Part2) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
(Part2) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
(Part 3): www.youtube.com The mathematical formulas used here are not the proper way for obtaining a real figure but they are based on assumptions in order to obtain a value fore the absolute minimum time needed for the collapse process. the Assumptions are: * That the intact structure below the impact zone will not arrest the falling structure above it and will allow it to continue the collapse. * That the intact structure below the impact zone will behave like a fluid allowing the falling structure above it to flow through it but only providing it with an average resistance force equal to the weight above the crumbling zone at any instant... (this is a reasonable assumption because the structure is designed to support the static load of the weight above it at any point throughout the length of the building so it will provide at least that force before it gives up or breaks) obviosly the real resistance force from the intact structure below will be alot more until it passes the elastic region and the plastic deformation then fructure but this calculation can give us the absolute minimum time needed. The proper way to do this is to use strain energy methods and you will find that the collapse will be arrested and not allowed to continue. 911 WTC twin towers New York USA Bin laden freefall speed controlled demolition structural failures melting steel pancake theory crushing crippling buckling shear failure speed of fall projectile reopen911.org 911 truth movement WTC 9/11 <b>...</b>
9:59
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/L_j1jAv1j3U/0.jpg)
(Part3) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
(Part3) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
The mathematical formulas used here are not the proper way for obtaining a real figure but they are based on assumptions in order to obtain a value fore the absolute minimum time needed for the collapse process. the Assumptions are: * That the intact structure below the impact zone will not arrest the falling structure above it and will allow it to continue the collapse. * That the intact structure below the impact zone will behave like a fluid allowing the falling structure above it to flow through it but only providing it with an average resistance force equal to the weight above the crumbling zone at any instant... (this is a reasonable assumption because the structure is designed to support the static load of the weight above it at any point throughout the length of the building so it will provide at least that force before it gives up or breaks) obviosly the real resistance force from the intact structure below will be alot more until it passes the elastic region and the plastic deformation then fructure but this calculation can give us the absolute minimum time needed. The proper way to do this is to use strain energy methods and you will find that the collapse will be arrested and not allowed to continue. 911 WTC twin towers New York USA Bin laden freefall speed controlled demolition structural failures melting steel pancake theory crushing crippling buckling shear failure speed of fall projectile reopen911.org 911 truth movement WTC 9/11 9-11 September 11th <b>...</b>
0:07
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/i1XhuvXbPXE/0.jpg)
C-130 Hard Landing structural failure flight test
C-130 Hard Landing structural failure flight test
Flight Test of a C-130 results in a hard landing that fails the wings structurally
2:11
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ya44UlbswA4/0.jpg)
Arcon Civil & Structural Failure Investigation
Arcon Civil & Structural Failure Investigation
Arcon provides a full complement of Structural and Civil engineering services including design and reconstruction of damaged structures, and investigating the causes of civil-related matters. .
0:54
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qf6bH5HKnas/0.jpg)
Structural Failure
Structural Failure
Our final project for Arch 150, Structures. It held 165 lbs laterally before Marcos pulled it a little more and it went. Observe!
2:24
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TqNq-G9AM-c/0.jpg)
Structural Failure Cited as Reason For Collapse
Structural Failure Cited as Reason For Collapse
The Architectural Association of Kenya says the collapsed building in Kiambu town was due to structural failure, a chilling phenomenon that is common among several buildings mushrooming in the nairobi city and other towns in the country .The revised building code that seeks to rid construction industry of quacks is the only way out of such disasters.
8:09
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HZxkkAghAwI/0.jpg)
911 Truth: Structural Failures vs. Controlled Demolitions
911 Truth: Structural Failures vs. Controlled Demolitions
Clip from 9/11 Mysteries: Compare and contrast what buildings look like when they collapse because a few joints weaken and break (which is the US government's explanation for the WTC collapse) vs. what buildings look like when they are taken down with explosives in controlled demolitions.
14:46
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7VPT_BY80pQ/0.jpg)
Let's Play Minecraft S2 Part 46a: Structural Integrity Failure
Let's Play Minecraft S2 Part 46a: Structural Integrity Failure
A few good star trek reference and I attempt to explore the nether in my shuttle.
20:23
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9EFZU9sLDD4/0.jpg)
Let's Play Minecraft S2 Part 46b: Structural Integrity Failure
Let's Play Minecraft S2 Part 46b: Structural Integrity Failure
A few good star trek reference and I attempt to explore the nether in my shuttle.
0:36
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5PWLhGwy5M8/0.jpg)
Mississippi River Air Show Crash 1996
Mississippi River Air Show Crash 1996
A plane crashes into the Mississippi River in June 1996 after a structural failure, killing the pilot.
5:05
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Cmys6OJCQ84/0.jpg)
NASA Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion Disaster - 73 Seconds Into Flight January 28 1986
NASA Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion Disaster - 73 Seconds Into Flight January 28 1986
AviationExplorer.com - The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster occurred on January 28, 1986, when Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, leading to the deaths of its seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated over the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of central Florida at 11 am EST. Disintegration of the entire vehicle began after an O-ring seal in its right solid rocket booster (SRB) failed at liftoff. The O-ring failure caused a breach in the SRB joint it sealed, allowing pressurized hot gas from within the solid rocket motor to reach the outside and impinge upon the adjacent SRB attachment hardware and external fuel tank. This led to the separation of the right-hand SRB's aft attachment and the structural failure of the external tank. Aerodynamic forces promptly broke up the orbiter. The crew compartment and many other vehicle fragments were eventually recovered from the ocean floor after a lengthy search and recovery operation. Although the exact timing of the death of the crew is unknown, several crew members are known to have survived the initial breakup of the spacecraft. However, the shuttle had no escape system and the astronauts did not survive the impact of the crew compartment with the ocean surface.
0:46
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BSUcGD6wu68/0.jpg)
Building Collapse in Center of Rio De Janeiro
Building Collapse in Center of Rio De Janeiro
A multistory building collapsed in Rio de Janeiro on Monday evening, leaving a neighborhood filled covered with rubble. Rescue crews searched through the night for survivors and victims. (Jan 26)
2:43
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20120420153712im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uwipEpNT6Qw/0.jpg)
Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster (STS-51L)
Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster (STS-51L)
Video Courtesy: NASA Beginning at about 72 seconds, a series of events occurred extremely rapidly that terminated the flight. Telemetered data indicated a wide variety of flight system actions that support the visual evidence of the photos as the shuttle struggled futilely against the forces that were destroying it. At about 72.20 seconds the lower strut linking the solid rocket booster and the external tank was severed or pulled away from the weakened hydrogen tank permitting the right solid rocket booster to rotate around the upper attachment strut. This rotation is indicated by divergent yaw and pitch rates between the left and right solid rocket boosters. At 73.124 seconds, a circumferential white vapor pattern was observed blooming from the side of the external tank bottom dome. This was the beginning of the structural failure of hydrogen tank that culminated in the entire aft dome dropping away. This released massive amounts of liquid hydrogen from the tank and created a sudden forward thrust of about 2.8 million pounds, pushing the hydrogen tank upward into the intertank structure. At about the same time, the rotating right solid rocket booster impacted the intertank structure and the lower part of the liquid oxygen tank. These structures failed at 73.137 seconds as evidenced by the white vapors appearing in the intertank region. Within milliseconds there was massive, almost explosive, burning of the hydrogen streaming from the failed tank bottom and liquid oxygen <b>...</b>