LET THEM EAT CAKE

Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking does right by his National Party mates and Seven Sharp puts the boot into the poor.

I was sweating the small stuff yesterday which I am want to do on occasions.

First up, this  tweet from Newtalk ZB's Mike Hosking really rankled me for its smugness and arrogance:

Dinner at St heliers bay bistro Arrived a bit after 6. You can't move for people Brilliant food Lovely service So much for the recession.


Presumably Hosking drove to his select little bistro  in his Maserati (approximate value $200,000).

In this  smug and self-satisfied  tweet Hosking, sitting with the wife in his crowded up-market  bistro, makes light of the struggles a great  many New Zealanders are facing today. He dismisses the rising tide of unemployment and the  growing level of social and economic  inequality.   The ugly statistic  that tells us that some 270,000 children are living in poverty means nothing. 'So much for  the recession' glibly tweets  Hosking, pouring another gallon of hair gel  over his head and preening himself in the bathroom mirror.  He might  as well tweeted 'let them  eat cake'.  Paul Holmes may have gone but his right wing politics live on in Mike Hosking.

And we can be certain  that Hosking meant what he tweeted.

Last month he  was the MC was at  John Key's  State of the Nation speech.

Hosking made his own  views  well known. He told the Tory gathering that:

'I’ve done my own state of the nation. As I see it, all things considered we are doing pretty bloody well. We box above our weight. We have bright prospects for the future, so long as you keep them in Government,”

When later   asked whether it was appropriate for Hosking,  as Newstalk ZB's breakfast host, to publicly endorse the National  Government and its policies his  boss, Dallas Gurney, retorted:  'So what.'

Given his  support  for the National Government there can be no doubt that Hosking will be 'attenuating  the positive' for his National Party mates  in the months leading up to the next general election. 

But Hosking has many political  allies in the media including TVNZ's dismal Seven Sharp.

Last night Seven Sharp did a piece on tenants who wreck their flats and houses.  The story was prefaced: 'Do tenants have too much power in this country?'

This is the kind of right wing  tabloid bilge that just stokes up the bigotry and prejudice  against the poor. But that didn't stop the soporific Alison Mau pontificating  about banning people from renting accommodation permanently.  This is a extreme 'solution' to what is only a minor social  problem but that didn't stop her  from suggesting it.  Mau is one of those presenters who competently learns her lines but her grasp of a subject is merely  based on what she can turn up on the internet in the two or three hours before going on air.

What is more than annoying is that Seven Sharp has done zero stories  on the extortionate rents that are being demanded by landlords  for sub-standard housing. In my neck of the woods (the eastern  suburbs of Christchurch) the exploitation of tenants by bloodsucking landlords is a major problem.  Nor has Seven Sharp had anything to say  the lack of any government commitment to social housing and the lack of affordable housing.  No, it prefers to  stick the boot into the poor again because they think it might help the ratings.

Perhaps Seven Sharp  would like to do  a story  on the survey that the Tenants Protection Association (Christchurch) Inc. is presently undertaking  on  the rising costs of residential rental properties in Christchurch and the Canterbury district post-earthquakes, and the effects these rising costs are having on tenants. The study is  also investigating  the quality and standards of rental housing.

But it won't of course. Alison Mau and her  two cronies will probably end up  with Mike Hosking at his Helier's Bay bistro where they will share jokes about the 'so-called recession'.

PARK AVENUE: MONEY, POWER AND THE AMERICAN DREAM



How much inequality is too much?

740 Park Ave, New York City, is home to some of the wealthiest Americans. Across the Harlem River, 10 minutes to the north, is the other Park Avenue in South Bronx, where more than half the population needs food stamps and children are 20 times more likely to be killed.

This is the America of President Barack Obama - who promised that a wind of change would sweep through the land.

In the last 30 years, inequality has rocketed in the US -- the American Dream only applies to those with money to lobby politicians for friendly bills on Capitol Hill.

PERSECUTING THE POOR

The government now intends to prosecute the partners of people convicted of welfare fraud. The amount of welfare fraud is minuscule  compared to the fraud committed by the wealthy - but the government isn't pursuing the rich  through the courts.

The Government is expanding its  war on beneficiaries to include the partners of beneficiaries. The government's 'answer' to the rising level of unemployment and underemployment is more intimidation and bullying of the victims of the economic crisis.

Associate Social Development Minister Chester Burrows, a man of little intellect but who knows how to say 'yes',  told Parliament that new legislation would be enacted that would allow the it  to charge  partners or spouses of beneficiaries who are  found guilty of wrongly collecting a benefit.

As well the Government  is further invading the privacy of  beneficiaries by removing the requirement for  investigators to inform beneficiaries that their financial records and other details  are being searched  for evidence of fraud. Surprisingly  the extremely vocal critics of the 'nanny state' have had nothing to say about this.  Where are the protests of the talkback hosts who raged against the 'nanny state' of the last Labour government?  They remain silent.

If a government wants to divert attention from the increasing  levels of unemployment and underemployment,  the growing level of  poverty and the yawning gap between rich and poor,  the  favourite method is to attack beneficiaries and the poor themselves. It can, after all,  expect a sympathetic media to ratchet up the level of intimidation against beneficiaries. Attack dogs like David Farrar, Mike Hoskings and Michael Laws will do that job unquestioningly.

Let us remind ourselves  that the intention of the  welfare state - perhaps social democracy's greatest achievement  -was to liberate people from  hunger, poverty and want. It was designed to allow people to live expansive lives, to be citizens of their country and feel as if they had a stake in it.

New Zealanders, I think,  took pride in the welfare state but its dismantlement  began with the fourth Labour Government who launched a neoliberal agenda that had received no mandate from the electorate.

And now in 2013 there is an attack on all fronts against beneficiaries and the poor. The government  narrative is  that beneficiaries and the poor are different and that they have no rights.  They are parasites, bludgers,  a blight on the country.  We can ruthlessly pursue them and no one should give a damn.

You can bully and intimidate people off welfare but, after a while, the level of social destitution becomes more and more apparent. This level of destitution cannot be explained away so you label beneficiaries as bludgers and parasites - and many of them are getting benefits they are not entitled to!  What better way of destroying any empathy people  might have with beneficiaries and the poor by implying that many of them are ripping off the taxpayer? And they're partners are implicated  as well!

I have talked  about 'welfare fraud' on this blog several times before  and it is less than encouraging that, thanks  to a docile media  that is receptive to the government's agenda,  the  attack on 'bludgers' and 'parasites' is allowed to dominate whenever the government feels the need to bash beneficiaries to divert attention from its own glaring inadequacies.

The fact is that there is no evidence of widespread welfare fraud.

It was Labour which  established  the special fraud unit  in 2007. In 2010 the special fraud checked 29 million records, and found the benefit fraud rate (as a percentage of the total benefits paid) was - wait for it - a mere  0.1  per cent. 

In fact benefit fraud has actually been declining. In 2004-05  the value of 'overpayment' was approximately  $56 million. In 2009-10 it had  shrunk to $20 million.

It doesn't seem to matter that the fraud committed by the wealthy is far greater than anything committed by welfare beneficiaries. This  is of no consequence to this government because it has no intention of going after its mates.

In June  last  year the Inland  Revenue announced the results of a ten year investigation into the tax dealings of the country’s 250 richest people and their 7,500 companies and trusts.   It turned out they have  avoided  paying $500 million worth  of tax.

Is the government pursuing these shysters through the courts? Of course it isn't.

Twenty years ago the writer and artist John Berger wrote:

"The poverty of our century is unlike that of any other. It is not, as poverty was before, the result of natural scarcity, but of a set of priorities imposed upon the rest of the world by the rich. Consequently, the modern poor are not pitied but written off as trash."

PRODUCT PLACEMENT

Seven Sharp wants a new and young audience to sell to advertisers but instead older viewers are tuning out and younger viewers don't want a diet of news lite, banal chat and lame jokes

TVNZ's attempt to turn news and current affairs into a breezy and  light entertainment show  looks as if it has hit the iceberg of viewer discontent although the crew say they aren't about to abandon the good ship Seven Sharp yet. But the life jackets are on standby.

In the fortnight since the show first aired  Seven Sharp has  been losing viewers at a rate even the most optimistic of us probably didn't even hope for.  On  Friday it attracted fewer than half the people who watched the show eleven days earlier. It was beaten again in the all the important ratings by Campbell Live for the second time in a week.

More than half of One News viewers changed channels rather than watch Seven Sharp. You can imagine the scene in living rooms up and down the country: 'It's that  bloody show again. Where's the remote?

Of course TVNZ have publicly dismissed the ratings carnage as a mere hiccup  but you can bet some highly paid TVNZ executives will be sweating over these figures, finger poised over the 'Panic ' button. TVNZ can and does ignore the critical lambasting it gets for its crap shows but screening  a crap show and getting crap ratings is the double whammy. 

But TVNZ are putting a brave face on it - just like they did when they said they weren't going to sack Paul Henry.

According to spokesperson  Megan Richards: "Seven Sharp is a long-term proposition that recognises the fact traditional current affairs - on any channel - is not thriving in a media environment where the primary competitor these days is actually YouTube."

Actually Seven Sharp is failing because it has alienated  a large swathe of its older audience but has failed to attract the younger audience that its advertisers are keen  to bash over the head with more asinine commercials.

Some commentators have suggested that tweaking the format might help but I  don't think that a show that so blatantly defined by commercial considerations has got much of a hope.

The corporate media, when its  not trying tell us what to think, is trying to sell us stuff.

Seven Sharp is all about shifting  stuff for its advertisers.  I resent that the former national public broadcaster has sunk to a new low that now sees the marketing division having an input into the content of this  'news' show.

If you are in the right age demographic (ie not old) then you are Seven Sharp's  product. They want to sell you to advertisers and they think they can do that with the lightweight pap they are serving up five nights a week.  The constant calls by  Ali and her two mates for us   to 'interact' with the show  via  social media is merely  an invite for us to play an active role in our own commodification.

So it is a cause for celebration that people have walked away from this show. But, I must confess, it is also a small and perhaps pyrrhic victory when we  consider that the combined efforts of both  Labour and National Government's have helped  destroy public broadcasting in this country.

CAPITALISM IS THE CRISIS



Capitalism Is The Crisis: Radical Politics in the Age of Austerity examines the ideological roots of the austerity agenda and proposes revolutionary paths out of the current crisis.

The ninety minute documentary includes interviews with Chris Hedges, Leo Panitch, David McNally and many more.

Special attention is devoted to the crisis in Greece, the 2010 G20 Summit protest in Toronto, Canada, and the remarkable surge of solidarity in Madison, Wisconsin.

It may be their crisis, but it's our problem.

GIVE THAT MAN A WHITE FLAG TO WAVE!

The Living Wage Campaign is undermined by both  high unemployment and a trade  union hierarchy that has nothing to offer but rhetoric.

One can appreciate the merits of the campaign for a living wage but the campaign has been undermined from the off by the growing level of  unemployment and underemployment.  High unemployment and the increasing casualisation of the labour force  put downward pressure on  wages. Why? If someone  won't do a job for the derisory minimum wage there's always someone desperate enough who will.

The  research work of Charles Waldegrave and Peter King of the  Family Centre Social Policy Research Unit has concluded that an hourly wage of $18.40 is required  to allow people to live a life that isn't just  about trying to survive.

Waldegrave says about one third of New Zealand workers earn less than $18.40 an hour.

The purpose of the Living Wage campaign  is to 'persuade'  employers to pay more. But why should they?  With a chronically high rate level of unemployment they just won't.  This campaign, I'm afraid, demonstrates  far too much misplaced faith  in the 'benevolence' of employers.

No wonder Labour leader David Shearer supports this campaign - he doesn't actually have to do anything but he will get a few brownie points in the process of doing nothing.

The support for this campaign by the  Council of Trade Unions is entirely hypocritical since it has  done next to nothing  to fight the rising tide of job losses. In fact in a time of economic crisis industrial action is at an all time low.

Says  Helen Kelly of the CTU: “Many people talk about the need to lift pay – but often little is done. We need a real commitment to decent jobs in New Zealand and lifting pay requires improvements in the minimum wage, improvements in collective bargaining coverage, sharing the benefits of productivity improvements, and a real recognition that the huge inequalities of income are unjustified and must be addressed”.

As Helen Kelly and the CTU regularly prove, we can all  release a  press statement and show up at some media bash but it is quite another thing altogether to actually do anything.

While Kelly talks of needing  ' a real commitment to decent jobs in New Zealand'  she and her fellow  union officials having done nothing to fight back against the thousands of 'decent jobs' that are disappearing right here, right now.  Ms Kelly and her CTU colleagues certainly haven't shown  much 'real commitment to decent jobs' in recent years.

Since 2008 something  like 47,000 jobs have been lost in the manufacturing sector alone. The  CTU have nothing to oppose these job losses - in fact they have shamefully cooperated  with employers to ensure the redundancy process is polite and orderly. We don't want any trouble now  do we? Nothing to see here, folks - just move on.

Just yesterday NZ Post announced that it was axing 100 jobs - with more job losses rumoured to be in the pipeline.

These job losses have come on to top of recent loss of 200 jobs losses at Mainzeal, 100 jobs at Contact Energy and 190 job losses at Summit Woolspinners.

You would of thought that union officialdom might have finally decided that 'enough is enough' but there  is never 'a line that must not be crossed' as far as these people are concerned.

The response of the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union  (EPMU)  to the job losses at NZ Post has been typical.

All   EPMU postal spokesman Joe Gallagher had to offer his sacked workers was that the EMPU  ' was working with NZ Post on the redundancy process.'

Fantastic. Give that man a white flag to wave.

THE 'INSPIRATION' FOR SEVEN SHARP


MORE BLUSTER FROM BROWNLEE


Gerry Brownlee claims the Christchurch rebuild is being led by the local  community. So when exactly did  the people of Christchurch vote for the massive central city buildings that could bankrupt the city? Oh, that's right - they didn't.

 Every month the good people of Christchurch receive a eight  page full colour tabloid in their mailbox called the Greater Christchurch Recovery Update.

It is  produced by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) and is largely propaganda.   Every month CERA and the Government pat  themselves on the back with a whole load of good news stories about the wonderful things they are doing. The article I'm looking at right now is headlined 'Rescued plants to star at the Ellerslie International Flower Show'. It's about as substantial as Seven Sharp but, hey, its got that positive vibe!

So although it calls itself the Greater Christchurch Recovery Update there isn't much updating about anything  that is of any real consequence and of  concern to the good people of Christchurch. There's nothing about the housing crisis (because the government still won't admit there is one). There's nothing about   the growing level of poverty in the eastern  suburbs. There's  also  nothing about the misery that the insurance companies and the Earthquake Commission are continuing to cause.  And there's certainly  no mention of the  difficulties  that people are having with CERA.

Like the Christchurch rebuild itself there is no local input into this publication. Many community groups, I imagine, would like to pen a few words  abut what is happening in Christchurch but the chances of their articles ever appearing in this publication are as likely as Gerry Brownlee not scoffing all the pies when no one is looking.  This publication  is put together within the auspices of the  CERA bureaucracy and delivered  to the masses whether  they want it or not - just like CERA'S corporate-friendly central city plan.

Not surprisingly both Gerry Brownlee and CERA chief Roger Sutton contribute a column each to  this publication.

In the latest issue Brownlee devotes almost half his column to criticising those who have had the bad form to say that local people have been shut out of the Christchurch rebuild process.

Brownlee  writes:

I hear a lot about a lack of community input into the recovery. This is nonsense. Communities are driving the recovery.

That's an interesting claim  since the government  has  adopted a bureaucratic top-down approach to the rebuild. How exactly is the local Christchurch community driving the recovery?  If the local community was indeed driving the recovery I don't think the eastern suburbs would still be the disaster zones they are today. Things would have got done.

Nor would we building a huge sports stadium in the middle of the city. Or a massive convention centre.

But Brownlee's idea of a community driven rebuild is the community driven rebuild you have when you're not having a community driven rebuild.

According to Brownlee:

'This community-led impetus is within the context of  a planning and investment framework provided by the government, through CERA and  other government agencies, and local territorial authorities.'

In other words the recovery is being directed and controlled by the government and CERA.  The community is not at the heart of the rebuild and Brownlee's attitude is both arrogant and paternalistic  We simple folk out in the suburbs should just organise a picnic or two and leave the real work to the big boys - the government and its corporate mates.

In his column Roger  Sutton thinks we should all be very happy  about 'The Amazing Place Schools Competition to design a playground and project for Christchurch's central city'.  Gosh, Roger - first up, we got 'pop up picnics' and now playgrounds. Could you be any more banal? When did you come up with this?  When you were shredding the Christchurch City Council's draft central city plan?

Well Roger, I'm not interested in some little playground. What I'm unhappy about is CERA continuing to ignore the eastern suburbs and CERA's decision to build some massive monoliths in the central city that could easily bankrupt this city. These are the projects of the corporates and the property developers. Perhaps you would like to us where the 'community involvement' is here?

In September last year Roger Sutton lashed out at former Mayor Garry Moore who commented that  local people  had been shut out of the rebuild process and that it was time shine the torchlight of democracy on the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA).

Sutton responded that someone had to lead the recovery  -  and it isn't the local community as his mate Brownlee claims. This is a top down rebuild controlled by the government and CERA. The corporates and the property developers will reap the big profits.

All local Christchurch folk are getting is patronising dribble from Brownlee and Sutton. And the huge bills.


Graphic: Porcupine Farm

TOTALITARIAN CAPITALISM

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei thinks conducting elections every four years  will stop 'radical swings'. John Key thinks the economy suffers from having elections. Welcome to totalitarian capitalism.

We live in a country where  we have effectively been disenfranchised. It doesn't matter who we vote for  we still end up with a government that puts the interests of capital first  and we, the people, a distant last. We still end up with a government that says that  there is no alternative  to the free market. The differences  between the parties is one of emphasis rather than substance. Anyone who says otherwise has simply surrendered to capital.

So next time we vote, despite the charade of the election campaign, we'll still end up with a government that will be offering nothing  but more of the same. All the chatter, all the punditry and all the opinion polls will add up to nought because we'll still end up with a government of the ruling class.

Could we get even less democracy?  Yes, we could. The well paid and well fed parliamentary politicians want to shut us out of the political process just a little bit more by extending the three year term to four.

Having the great unwashed 'interfering' in the affairs of the nation, even as little as just once every three years, is just so tiresome. According to the Prime Minister the economy suffers from having elections!

Here's Metiria Turei of the Green Party  embracing the idea of a four year term: : "There's potential for more stability and less radical swings from one government to another and that's a major issue for the community and business in particular."

Think about what Turei is saying.  She is advocating the seamless transition from one neoliberal government to the next and minimising the risk of getting a government that  might be thinking of - gasp - upturning the neoliberal applecart. She seems to regard political elections as just a change of directors in the boardroom of New Zealand Inc. But given the Green Party's enthusiasm for the 'free market' this is not wholly surprising.  The Green Party are happy to give big  business what it wants

Clearly business interests would like the idea of 'more stability' but to suggest that restricting people's input into the political process even further would somehow benefit the community is elitist nonsense. 

Let's be clear:  John Key, David Shearer, Metiria Turei. Russel Norman, Winston Peters, Peter Dunne and co are representatives of totalitarian capitalism. Having ensured that the economy only benefits the few at the expense of  the many, they  now  want to shore up what amounts to an elected dictatorship.

it's no surprise that the media cheerleaders for corporate capitalism think the idea of a four year term is just  dandy. Here's  what the NZ Herald thinks : 'Governments need time to establish and then implement new policies that are  not hostage to the next opinion poll.'

The NZ Herald  is  being disingenuous.  There won't be any new policies in the sense there'll be any deviation from neoliberalism. There'll be just more of the anti-working class policies that have allowed the rich to get even richer.

The politicians, the business suits and  the corporate media hacks  have crowded us out of the political life of our own country. People like Metiria Turei  think that we should just stand back and watch while she and her  'enlightened' colleagues manage the affairs  of the nation. They've done a great job so far, eh?

The so-called 'professionals' and 'experts'  want to maintain and perpetuate an economy that benefits the few at the expense of the many. We can't  afford to let these people rule the country in any  manner they see fit.

We need more democracy, not less.  As Bryce Edwards notes:

 If anything, we should be having more frequent elections. In fact the old Chartist movement idea of ‘Annual Parliaments’ is one worth considering. That should be the demand of true democrats – more frequent elections rather than having politicians given yet more protection from the public.

It is ironic that while the creed of neoliberalism has promised 'freedom and choice' it has  instead produced something closely resembling totalitarian capitalism.

THE COMMON PEOPLE



Comedian George Carlin reflects on what we all have in common - and why the ruling class just want to keep on playing up our differences.

JOHNNY NO JOBS

It seemed symbolic that the disastrous unemployment figures were released on the same  day that  New Zealand's third biggest construction company collapsed. Mainzeal has gone into receivership and the impact on an already stagnant economy will be far reaching.  What solution has the government got for the economic crisis?  It wants to drive another 44,000 beneficiaries off welfare,  even though there no jobs for them to go to.

The employment situation is 'challenging' according to the Government. 

That's one word for it. But if we were being truthful we would describe it as 'horrific', 'dismal' and 'unacceptable'. 

The official figures say that unemployment fell from 7.3 percent to 6.9 percent  but only because of some 33 ,000 dropping out of the job market altogether. The unemployment rate fell only because even more people gave up looking for work than lost jobs.

The numbers of those deemed officially unable to find a job fell by 10,000 to 163,000 in the final three months of 201

What is just as alarming is that 111,000 people  are looking for more hours of work because they simply can't survive  on the number of hours they have at present.    These folk are the working  poor, the victims of the casualisation of the labour  and the drive to  the bottom, to lower wages and degraded working conditions.

The jobless number which includes those discouraged from seeking work is now 284,500 people. This  is a very long way from the 170,000 jobs  that National promised it would create  if it got a second term in office.

You cannot bully and harass people into jobs that don't exist but that is what this cynical government is continuing  to do.

If you’re low-waged, unemployed or disabled in New Zealand today, you can still  expect to be told that it’s your own fault.

There is more bashing to come. Despite the fact that his government has comprehensively failed to  provide enough jobs, the Minister of Finance, Bill English , has said that his“biggest single effort” to cut costs in 2013 will  be through more welfare  'reform'. He wants to cut loose 44,000 beneficiaries and damn the social  consequences.

But, as I 've said so often before, the parliamentary opposition parties have nothing to offer other than  the empty claim that they  manage the market economy  better than National. The docile and lacklustre  leadership of the CTU have fallen obediently in behind Labour. We are being betrayed again.

For those of us who believe  ordinary people should democratically control their own economy and therefore their own destiny, we need to continually put forward the case for  democratic economic planning to create jobs, protect the environment and meet human need.

It is time  to start organising our economy for people rather than capital. It is time to reclaim our futures because one thing is for certain - the politicians won't do it for us.






NEWS LITE

Seven Sharp was awful but the predictable product of a tabloid news service.

According to TVNZ's publicity: 'Seven Sharp cuts through the headline clutter to bring you the day's stories with razor sharp wit and insight.'

Well, that  'razor sharp wit and insight'  wasn't in evidence on the debut edition of Seven Sharp - and they've had months to prepare this show.

Jesse Mulligan,  Greg Boyed and Alison  Mau tried to extract some humour about  who would escort John Key at Waitangi. I don't pretend to be totally au fait with all things Maori but isn't lampooning Maori protocol more than a bit dodgy?  How come Maori are the butt of the jokes while someone as loathsome as  Paula Bennett gets to raise her profile?

Good satire is angry satire that makes us think  but the 'humour' of Seven Sharp is of the  'nudge, nudge' kind that isn't going to fluster and anger  the political establishment.   I wanted the ghost of comedian  George Carlin to appear in the studio  and demand that the  bullshit should stop immediately.

Some  journo got to meet John  Key who even admitted he was doing 'a fluff piece'. She drank some wine with John  and then she was escorted around Parliament by those 'lovely' politicians Paula Bennett and Trevor Mallard. Shane Jones popped up at some stage and someone mentioned videos. Laugh? I never started.

Then there was some insubstantial piece about an ex-soldier who had been suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome He had been in Afghanistan but we learnt little about what he had been doing there. Jesse and Ali told me that if I was severely depressed I should get help immediately. Eh?

That piece of wisdom thus imparted to the masses (many of whom had probably tuned out by this stage, I suspect)  there was a lightweight piece of nonsense involving Greg Boyed interviewing singer Josh Groban. My notes mention 'Crowded House' and 'water skiing'. I can't tell you anything else because I was losing the will to live by this stage.

Seven  Sharp is the predictable product of a tabloid news  service that began to emerge, more or less, when TVNZ was turned into  a state-owned enterprise.  This is a show that doesn't raise public  awareness about crucial issues  - that's what a good public broadcaster would do. But TVNZ is  a public broadcaster in name only and a show like Seven Sharp only exists to deliver the right audience demographics for advertisers.

There are a lot of very critical comments on Seven Sharp's  Facebook page. I like this one from David Masters: 'The only thing that could make me want to watch this less is Petra Bagust.'

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More