In Australia, "interurban" is a general term for intercity rail.

An interurban from Philadelphia and Western Railroad, which survived long in the interurban business.

An interurban, also called a radial railway in parts of Canada, is a type of electric passenger railroad; in short a hybrid between tram (streetcar) and train. Interurbans enjoyed widespread popularity in the first three decades of the twentieth century in North America. Until the early 1920s, most roads were unpaved and could become nearly impassable during wet weather. Travel was by horseback or carriage, and cartage was by horse-drawn wagon. The interurban provided a new predictable, durable, and comfortable way to travel and, in some cases, a way to get farm products including fresh milk into town. Nowadays, services that were formerly called "interurban" are variously categorized as commuter rail or light rail, depending on operation, and may include urban streetcar lines. The Tram-train may be considered as a modernization of the interurban.

Rise and decline[link]

Interurbans were often extensions of existing streetcar lines running between urban areas or from urban to rural areas. The lines were mainly electrified in an era when steam railroads had not yet adopted electricity to any large degree. By 1910, there was a very large network of small interurban lines in the U.S., particularly in Indiana and Ohio. Many were financially weak from the beginning. An electric interurban railroad was expensive to build, and there were always construction surprises, such as an unplanned bridge, or a town that demanded streets for the interurban to construct, and franchise fees. In operation, interurbans were labor-intensive and physical plant expensive, and frequently passenger revenues were not as originally projected. Many did not survive the 1920s, following the country's growing adoption of the automobile and the onset of the Great Depression in 1930.

By emphasizing freight service, some interurban lines (such as the Cincinnati and Lake Erie Railroad, the Indiana Railroad, the Lake Shore Electric Railway, and portions of the Pacific Electric) struggled through the Depression but were abandoned just before World War II.^[1] Some lines barely made it to World War II, enjoyed a war-related surge in business, only to decline into abandonment after the end of the war. Examples are the Hagerstown & Frederick Railway, Illinois Terminal, Lehigh Valley Transit near Philadelphia, Sacramento Northern, and the remaining portions of the Pacific Electric. The British Columbia Electric Railway In southwestern BC Canada, survived until 1958, a success story of the type. It was reborn 20 years later as SkyTrain (Vancouver)

Interurban lines that have survived to the present day often evolved into commuter railroads or freight short lines. Examples are the Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad, Philadelphia and Western, the Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway, and the Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company.

Definition of "interurban"[link]

Real-world lines fit on a continuum between wholly urban street railways and full-fledged railroads. George W. Hilton and John F. Due, in The Electric Interurban Railways in America,^[2] define an interurban as a system which shares most or all of four characteristics:

• Electric power
• Passenger service as primary emphasis
• Heavier, faster equipment than urban streetcars
• Operated on street trackage in cities but on roadside tracks or private rights-of-way in rural areas

The definition of "interurban" is necessarily blurry. Some streetcar systems evolved partly into interurban systems with extensions or acquisitions, while other interurban lines became, effectively, light rail systems with no street running whatsoever, or became primarily freight-hauling railroads with a progressive loss of passenger service.

Another distinction is made between "interurban" and "suburban". A suburban system is oriented toward a particular city center in a single urban area, serving primarily commuters who live in the suburbs of a city. An interurban is more like a regular railroad local train service, moving people from one city center to another with no single center. However, unlike a local train, the interurban serves a smaller region and has more frequent service, and is oriented to passenger rather than freight service, although some small-load freight service was common, especially in the days before trucks (lorries).

The word interurban has defined both the interurban system or network, and the wagons or railcars.

History of interurban rail in North America[link]

Early popularity[link]

Interurbans were most popular in the early 20th century; this children's toy model dates from 1911

The first interurbans were constructed in the 1880s, following the successful development of the electric traction motor and controller by Frank Sprague. States with numerous interurban lines were Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin. States with less interurban density were Iowa, Utah, California, Texas, and Oklahoma. By 1900, just over 2,100 miles (3,400 km) of track had been laid. Mileage peaked in 1916 with over 15,500 miles (24,900 km).^[3] Always requiring extensive operating capital for many employees, rolling stock acquisition, rolling stock maintenance, operation of shops, track maintenance, interurbans could go bankrupt and into receivership even during a good year. One bridge washout, wreck, fire, strike, or dispute with a village or town over track issues and franchise costs could cause bankruptcy for a struggling line.

Onset of decline[link]

Beginning around the end of World War I, the fortunes of the industry began to decline. This trend accelerated in the 1920s due to the growth in automobile ownership combined with state construction of durable concrete roads and highways. Often these roadways flanked the interurban lines, and, in some cases, the state would pressure a struggling interurban to abandon service so that its right-of-way could be taken and used by the state to build a wider road. The economic and financial pressures which arose at the onset of the Great Depression finally drove most interurbans into bankruptcy in the early-to-late 1930s. A few survived into the 1950s, still fewer into the 1960s. Those that survived into the 1960s tended to be lines that had become commuter systems serving large cities, such as Chicago's North Shore Line and South Shore Line. Only the South Shore Line operates today, and this is with regional subsidies. The South Shore still shows part of its interurban past with its center-of-street operation in Michigan City. Other survivors had developed an unusually strong freight business like the Illinois Terminal, although the IT is now gone as a separate corporate entity. It was absorbed by competitive railroads and parts of its former trackage were abandoned. The IT had well maintained track between towns and could operate freight trains at considerable speed, but once into the many towns and villages along its route, it reverted to its legacy interurban street running, including exceptionally tight turns at town block corners.^[2][4]

Layout[link]

To minimize cost of construction, an interurban typically ran along public right-of-way, often next to a public highway in rural areas, or on city streets in urban areas. This could require the negotiation of very sharp curves at intersections and climbing steep town grades. Often when an interurban was first constructed, in rural country the adjacent road was unpaved and became bottomless mud during summer wet periods or in winter. Horses would struggle to move people and wagons. In some areas, like rural Pennsylvania, the interurban might be the only reliable daily transportation both for moving people as well as farm to town market products such as vegetables, fruit, meat, and fresh milk. It was less common for interurbans to have long unencumbered stretches of private right-of-way, but some did. Occasionally interurbans ran adjacent to competitive mainline steam railroads, but fares were cheaper, and service was more frequent and not necessarily slower. Due to the characteristics of the electric motor, interurbans could operate on steeper grades, going where steam engines could not. Some lines had steeple cab electric locomotives, box motors, or regeared interurban coaches that could pull two or more railroad freight cars which might result in good freight business eventually providing greater revenue than the passenger business. Some interurbans owned heavy electric locomotives capable of handling longer trains. In a number of cases, passenger business was abandoned and only freight business continued.^[2]

Buses[link]

With the demise of the interurban, many routes were taken over by intercity bus services such as Greyhound and Trailways. Many local intercity services have since been discontinued, and buses now typically run express between major cities. A few interurbans, built to rather high standards, have survived, as have several that still operate only freight service, but the vast majority are long abandoned. Probably the closest present day trolley line resembling a 1920s interurban – with city to countryside to village, side-of-road, "hill and dale" operation – is the present-day broad gauge Upper Darby to Media 100-year-old former Red Arrow line of Philadelphia's SEPTA system. The last third of the Media line becomes single-track private right-of-way with sidings for cars to pass. The cars move rapidly into and out of wooded ravines and along creek beds to then emerge into Media Borough where the cars run trolley-style down the center of Media's main commercial street, State Street. In the early 1900s, this was the Philadelphia and West Chester interurban. At that time it operated all-wood, arch-window heavy interurban cars typical of equipment used nationwide at that time.

Car design and manufacturers[link]

There were many interurban car manufacturers, particularly in the 1890 to 1915 period of the classic arch-window, all-wood-truss-rod interurban. One of the best known of these was the Jewett Car Company of Ohio. Jewett was a company of craftsmen woodworkers that turned out beautifully made interurban coaches and combines featuring interiors of highly polished mahogany, oak, and cherry wood. Jewett did not survive beyond 1919. Other manufacturers of the all-wood design were the Kuhlman Car Company and the J. G. Brill Company. Wood cars were bad in wrecks, famous for "telescoping" one car into and onto another killing passengers, and beginning around 1915 steel was primarily used. Well known makers of steel interurban cars included Pullman, Brill, Cincinnati Car Company, St. Louis Car Company, Southern Car, Pressed Steel, Hall-Scott, and Holman. St. Louis Car, Pullman, and Brill survived to near present day by manufacturing subway-elevated cars, streetcars, and, in some cases, buses. Over time, J. G. Brill absorbed many of the others and eventually became not only the longest lasting but the largest of the interurban manufacturing companies. In the 1940s, Brill manufactured buses with American Car and Foundry. The buses carried the logo "ACF-Brill" and many operated in Pennsylvania and nearby Delaware.^[5]

In 1929, recognizing the need for more comfort and speed to attract more riders plus reduce power consumption to reduce costs, some interurban railways worked with manufacturers to develop innovative interurban car designs. Using aluminum to provide lower weight, a lower center of gravity, and improved ride on often what was rough track, the Cincinnati and Lake Erie in 1929 purchased light weight interurban cars it called "Red Devils" that dramatically improved schedules and, for awhile, business. The Indiana Railroad did the same in 1930 with its lightweights of a similar design. The Bullet cars built by Brill for the Philadelphia and Western and then the Fonda, Johnstown, and Gloversville in 1932, were innovative and successful designs but few were sold. The Philadelphia and Western Bullets ran into the 1980s operated by SEPTA.^[2][4]

Light rail[link]

The present day North American light rail movement essentially revived the concept of the interurban, but without using the word "interurban". Portland; the state of New Jersey; San Diego; Denver; Baltimore; and many other cities in Canada and the United States have built light rail systems with characteristics of the old interurbans: slow running in the center of streets, tight-radius turns in town but fast running on private right-of-way outside of town.

Interurban technology[link]

A technical drawing of a shoe.

In general, interurbans operated with technology somewhere between that of a streetcar line and a full-scale railroad. The vast majority of interurbans were electrified, utilizing simply strung overhead wire, or, on heavily trafficked high speed lines, the more complicated wiring system known as catenary. In either case, power was transferred from the wire to the locomotive (in the case of an interurban freight line) or interurban passenger car by way of a trolley pole or pantograph. Some interurbans transferred electricity to the trains by way of a third rail running parallel to, and outside of, the rails when running on private right-of-way while overhead supply was used elsewhere, notably in built up areas (i.e. Sacramento Northern Railway, and Chicago Aurora and Elgin Railroad). Power was transferred to the train using a "shoe" attached to the locomotive or car. Engineers working for Michigan United Railways devised a shoe with steel cutters which could remove ice from the tracks.^[6]

Electrification[link]

Most interurban railways in North America were electrified using low-voltage direct current (DC) systems popular with street railways.^[7] This enabled interurbans to use urban street railway systems with ease. However, these systems had difficulty in maintaining voltage over long distances. Thus, interurbans developed the practice of generating power at higher voltages and stepping down power to the 600 volts needed to power the cars at substations spaced out along the line. By 1905, 600 volts had become the industry-wide standard. The interurbans also had to develop their own powerhouses for electricity as there were few commercial power companies in existence at the time. Some of these steam driven power generation houses produced high-voltage AC power that would be stepped-down and converted to DC at the substations using what was called a "rotary converter." The rotary converter combined the features of an AC motor and a DC generator into a single-armature rotating machine. Because of owning a power house, many interurban railway companies became electric companies to their local regions.

Most power was distributed to the cars using overhead trolley wires or pantographs. Some companies preferred outside third rail. Third rail was cheaper to maintain and improved conductivity, but it was more expensive to construct as it did not mitigate the construction of transmission lines and poles. Third rail was also more dangerous to trespassers and animals. Also, in the winter, third rails were difficult to keep clear of ice.

In 1904, a single-phase alternating current (AC) system became available and was distributed by Westinghouse and General Electric. But the system soon proved expensive to maintain and operate, and it increased wear and tear on equipment and track. It was a short-lived experiment and none were installed after 1910.

Another experiment in electrification came in 1907 with high-voltage DC (1200 volts). This system allowed for easy conversion from other DC systems and was cheaper to maintain. But it was developed so late that few railways adopted it.

Gauge[link]

Most interurbans were built to 4 ft 8 ¹⁄₂ in (1,435 mm) standard gauge, but there were a fair number of exceptions. Interurbans often used the tracks of existing street railways through city streets, and when those street railways were not built to standard gauge, the interurbans had to use non-standard gauges as well or face the expense of building their own trackage through urban areas. Many municipalities had ordained the use of non-standard gauges so that railroad freight cars could never be switched onto public streets. The 4 ft 8 ¹⁄₂ in (1,435 mm) gauge Pacific Electric Railway and the 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) gauge Los Angeles Railway shared dual gauge track in down town Los Angeles.

Exceptions[link]

• See Broad gauge railways, by gauge and country.
• In the Czech Republic, the Liberec-Jablonecinterurban runs on metre-gauge track. In Belgium, the SNCV Vicinal network was one of the most important metric gauge interurbans.

Passenger service[link]

First Passenger Interurban to Bellefontaine, Ohio July 1, 1908.

This section requires expansion.

The true first interurbans were small coaches on rails pulled by horses along unpaved streets between small towns. But most people consider the "first" interurbans bring to be the very large arch windowed all wood coaches and combines running alongside one lane meandering rutted dirt roads between towns in the 1900 to 1920 time period.^[1] Due to the tendency for these massive cars to "telescope" in collisions, of which there were some genuine disasters leading to a large number of injuries and deaths, around 1915 only steel cars were manufactured by companies such as J.G.Brill, Cincinnati Car Company, St.Louis Car, Southern Car, and Kuhlman. Many interurbans competed directly with nearby steam railroads, but they offered more frequent service, lower fares, and frequent stops, often at a particular farm or home upon request. Limited service, if offered, was more restrictive about the number of stops. Eventually, interurban lines began to acquire equipment that was more efficient in operation regarding power consumption, more comfortable for the rider, and capable of faster operation.

Indiana Railroad Car number 65, now preserved at the Illinois Railway Museum, was built for IR by Pullman in 1931.

In the very late 1920s, some unique designs occurred with emphasis on light weight and speed. In particular, the Cincinnati and Lake Erie Railroad acquired "Red Devils" for high speed operation between major Ohio cities. The Indiana Railroad acquired cars based upon the C&LE design but with some design improvements including heavier trucks. Regardless of such improvements, ridership began to decline as the states began to improve highways for the use of the many automobiles being produced. Ridership dramatically declined with the onset of the Depression.

Freight service[link]

Those interurbans carrying freight were typically the last to disappear. The Insull lines focus on freight allowed freight revenues to subsidize money losing passenger operations. Most of the smaller interurbans only carried LCL (in the days of the interurban, Less than Carload Lot) freight in box motors, while the bigger interurbans carried car load freight. The North Shore Line was an early adopter of TOFC trains, and the South Shore Line operated three 800-class "Little Joe" electric locomotives. Not only were these locomotives large for an interurban, they were some of the largest and most powerful locomotives ever made for any railroad. Typical interurban freight operations, when not hauled in LCL fashion, were hauled behind box-cab or steeple-cab motors, with a footprint dimension similar to a GE 80-tonner diesel. Some interurbans had an auxiliary battery power system on their locomotives for operation on un-wired spurs. Frequently the box-cabs were older passenger interurban cars rebuilt in the company shops. Seats and windows were replaced with wide side doors to become a package and freight hauler. "Steeple-cab" locomotives were built by General Electric, Baldwin Westinghouse, or by the interurban line's own shops.^[8]

North America[link]

United States[link]

A streetcar of the Pacific Electric Railway makes a stop at Mission San Gabriel Arcángel (just outside Los Angeles), c. 1905.

In the late 1890s, electrified systems called streetcars, which had been developed by Frank Sprague, expanded rapidly. By 1900, just over 2,100 miles (3,400 km) of track had been laid, and by 1916, at their peak, over 15,500 miles (24,900 km) were in service. Most of the interurban track that had been laid was located in Ohio and Indiana; both states had 3,000 miles (4,800 km) of track. In Michigan and Illinois there was another 2,000 miles (3,200 km) of track which was interconnected. In Texas and in California, thousands of miles of additional track was also laid down by different companies. The first Interurban in Texas was the Denison and Sherman Railway, completed in 1901. In central Virginia, interurban lines connected City Point and Hopewell with Petersburg, and Petersburg with Richmond. Another connected Richmond with Ashland.

In the early 1900s, interurban transportation was very popular in both rural areas and cities. Electric cars offered greater acceleration and lower cost with higher frequency and more stops than mainline steam. After 1910, the popularity of the automobile began to diminish the interurban passenger load, and during the 1920s, many interurban systems were declared bankrupt. Many were also bought out in the Great American Streetcar Scandal and deliberately destroyed. As a result of this shift in transportation methods, the small and unprofitable lines were discontinued. By the 1930s, most of the interurbans had disappeared, although some of their rail lines were taken over for the use of freight drawn by steam engines. Most were replaced with buses. By the 1960s, very few lines remained; the Pacific Electric Railway in California was abandoned in 1961, and the Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee Railroad near Chicago in 1963.

Remaining and new lines[link]

South Shore train in the streets of Michigan City, Indiana in 2002.

Few historic interurban lines are still operated in their original form, although a number of more recently-constructed transit lines could be considered interurbans by Hilton and Due's standards above.

The streetcar systems constructed in the 19th and early 20th centuries typically only ran in single-car setups. Some rail lines experimented with multiple unit configurations, where streetcars were joined together to make short trains, but this did not become common until later. When lines were built over longer distances (typically with a single track) before good roads were common, they were generally called interurban streetcars in most of North America or radial railways in Ontario. After World War II, seven major North American cities (Toronto, Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Pittsburgh, Newark, and New Orleans) continued to operate large streetcar systems. When these cities upgraded to new technology, they called it light rail to differentiate it from their existing streetcars since some continued to operate both the old and new systems.

• The South Shore Line running from Millennium Station in Chicago to South Bend, Indiana is the successor of the passenger operations of the Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad, part of Samuel Insull's once-great interurban empire. The line now serves commuters to Chicago from the suburbs of Northwest Indiana. It still includes a street running section in Michigan City, Indiana, but has evolved into many characteristics of a commuter rail operation, including sharing the trackage of the Metra Electric Line (formerly the Illinois Central Railroad) into downtown Chicago.
• The Chicago Transit Authority's Yellow Line, otherwise known as the Skokie Swift, is the southernmost five miles (8 km) of the Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee's 1924 high speed Skokie Valley Route. The North Shore was also part of Samuel Insull's interurban empire.
• The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's SEPTA Route 100 (also known as the Norristown High Speed Line) operates over the old Philadelphia and Western Railroad's Norristown, Pennsylvania line. The line has full grade separation, third rail electrification and high platforms, characteristic of rapid transit systems but uses smaller cars with on-board fare collection, like light rail systems.
• In Los Angeles, the LACMTA Blue Line uses much trackage that was the Pacific Electric's route between Los Angeles and Long Beach. There is street trackage at both the Long Beach and Los Angeles ends of the line, and a short subway section at the Los Angeles terminus.
• Although it runs on diesel power, the RiverLINE of New Jersey is otherwise an interurban (it uses light rail, it runs in the streets of Camden, it is more comfortable than typical urban light-rail vehicles, such as the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail's trams, it runs outside of town). Fare collection is the current fashion for light rail (proof-of-payment). This line was recently built, mostly along a freight railroad right-of-way.
• The Pittsburgh Light Rail system is a direct descendant of the former interurban lines of the Pittsburgh Railways Company. In 1984, the Port Authority of Allegheny County converted two former streetcar lines to the South Hills into a modern Light Rail system. It is the successor system to the streetcar network formerly operated by Pittsburgh Railways. The Red Line (Pittsburgh) operates on its own right of way and also through the streets of the Beechview neighborhood of Pittsburgh.

Other lines that have some characteristics of an interurban include:

• SEPTA Routes 101 and 102 Media and Sharon Hill lines, operating as light rail service mostly on dedicated rights of way but with some street trackage.
• The Green Line "D" Branch in Boston, a streetcar line on a grade-separated right-of-way formerly belonging to the Boston and Albany Railroad, a steam railroad
• The Ashmont-Mattapan High Speed Line in Boston, a streetcar line on a right-of-way formerly belonging to the Dorchester and Milton Branch Railroad, a steam railroad
• The IRT Dyre Avenue Line in New York City, a rapid transit line on a section of the former New York, Westchester and Boston Railway, an interurban.
• The Iowa Traction Railroad (former Mason City and Clear Lake Railway) still operates electric freight service.
• Several former interurbans, such as the Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway and Central California Traction Company now operate their trackage as diesel locomotive powered freight lines. The Chicago SouthShore and South Bend Railroad also continues to operate freight service along the passenger South Shore Line.
• The relatively new Hudson-Bergen Light Rail system in Hudson County, New Jersey runs along a dedicated right-of-way on some stretches, but in Jersey City it runs in the streets.
• San Pedro, California Port of LA Waterfront Red Car Line. A 1.5-mile line with three Interurban streetcars, one original Pacific Electric streetcar and two Pacific Electric streetcar replicas, with four stations. A unique heritage streetcar line.

Other portions of interurbans remain in service as parts of regular freight-hauling railroads. California features several former interurbans that survive for freight service. Portions of the Sacramento Northern Railway were operated by the Western Pacific Railroad. The longest surviving portion of the Sacramento Northern is now owned by the Sierra Northern Railroad. Most of the former Tidewater Southern Railway is still operated by the Union Pacific. Another California interurban company, the Central California Traction Company, still operates diesel freight service on its one-time electric line between Stockton and Lodi.

Present Day interurban style street-running freight train operation[link]

• Albany, Georgia Roosevelt Avenue
• Augusta, Georgia 6th Street & Broad Street
• Columbus, Georgia 9th Street & Broadway, 6th Avenue, 2nd Avenue
• Michigan City, Indiana South Shore Line freight from Gary.
• Oakland, California Embarcadero West, Union and Poplar Streets
• Visalia, California Oak Street from Willis St. to Santa Fe St (San Joaquin Valley Railroad)

File:File:///C:/Users/Patrick van der Loos/Downloads/BCER overpass.jpg

Canada[link]

In 1887 the St. Catharines and Niagara Central Railway, the first interurban line in the world, started operations. It ran between St. Catharines and Thorold, Ontario, Canada. Not only was this the first interurban line in the world, but it was also one of the first commercially successful implementations of electric streetcars in the world.

In Southern Ontario, intercity streetcar lines were called radial railways, because their routes generally radiated from a central city. The longest routes from Toronto included one running to Lake Simcoe and another to Guelph. A portion of one of these lines is preserved and plays host to a working museum of streetcars and other transit vehicles at the Halton County Radial Railway in Milton. A notable feature of Toronto's radial railways was that because the city streetcar tracks of the Toronto Railway Company (later taken over by the Toronto Transportation Commission) were built to a wider gauge (which is still used to this day), radial cars from the outlying areas could not pass the city limits, requiring passengers to change trains.

Some of the closer sections of Toronto's radial railways were assimilated into the city's streetcar network, and with the city's expansion, some communities once linked by radial railway now have relatively central stations on the Toronto subway. On a regional level, GO Transit's commuter railway network is designed on a similar radial principle, though it uses much heavier-capacity mainline trains.

There were also significant radial systems operating from Hamilton, St. Catharines, Windsor, and throughout the Grand River Valley, the last of which may see a revival should Grand River Transit obtain funding to build a light railway between Waterloo, Kitchener, and eventually Cambridge, running partially on the tracks of the former Grand River Railway. Hamilton and the Niagara Region are also investigating the possibility of reviving former interurban railway routes as modern light rail. Another southern Ontario line, the London and Port Stanley Railway, is notable for hauling large quantities of coal from Port Stanley that would arrive via railway ferry from Conneaut, Ohio.

In British Columbia, five interurban lines were operated by the British Columbia Electric Railway Company. The private right-of-way of the Central Park line, between Commercial Drive in Vancouver and New Westminster, is now used by the SkyTrain's Expo Line. The Fraser Valley Line became the British Columbia Hydro Railway when BC Electric was nationalized in the 1960s; it was later privatized and is now the Southern Railway of British Columbia, a local shortline freight railway. The BCER also operated interuban trains between Vancouver and Marpole, and between Marpole, Steveston and New Westminster on the Vancouver and Lulu Island Railway, which it leased from Canadian Pacific. This railway is also known as Arbutus Corridor route. Likewise, the Millennium Line of the SkyTrain connects the same communities as the former Burnaby Lake Line; however, the new SkyTrain line does not follow the original right-of-way, which is now the route of Highway 1 through Burnaby. The fifth BCER interurban connected Victoria and Patricia Bay on the Saanich Peninsula. Its right-of-way is commemorated by Interurban Road in Saanich.

In Quebec, the Montreal and Southern Counties Railway operated electric interurban lines from central Montreal across the St. Lawrence Seaway to Longueuil and Granby from 1909 to 1956.

In Nova Scotia, the Cape Breton Electric RCompany operated interurban services between Sydney, Glace Bay and New Waterford from 1901 to 1947, and the Pictou County Electric Company operated interurban services between the five towns of Pictou County from 1904 to 1931.

File:File:///C:/Users/Patrick van der Loos/Downloads/BCER overpass.jpg

Mexico[link]

In the first decade of the 20th century, Canadian investors purchased the Mexico City tram operator Compañía de Tranvías de México, and attempted to create an interurban radial-railway system on the Canadian model, beginning work on lines that were intended to reach Toluca and Puebla. Typical US style interurban electric cars built by the St. Louis Car Company were imported for the service. Expenses due to Mexico's difficult terrain and political instability that culminated in the Mexican Revolution combined to end this project although lines were completed as far as La Venta and Tulyehualco and a popular suburban line was built to San Angel and Coyoacán.^[9] A portion of the ex-Puebla line operates today as the Xochimilco Light Rail system. Another Mexican system that would have been considered of an interurban type was the Playa Miramar high-speed line in Tampico.

The Mexican state of Yucatán had approximately 1,500 kilometers of interurban tramway network, mostly narrow gauge and either animal powered (mule or horsecars) or gasoline powered.^[10]

Cuba[link]

The Hershey train is an electrified train from Havana to Matanzas that was built by the Hershey Company in order to facilitate transport of workers and products after it had bought sugar plantations in 1916. It is a commuter service running in northern Havana and Matanzas provinces, some original equipment still exists.

Europe[link]

In Europe, lines that fit the interurban definition were rare historically. A whole large interurban system in continuous service exists however since 1894 at Upper Silesia in Poland connecting cities and towns of this densely populated region (See Silesian Interurbans for more information). More common were either wholly urban, street-running tram systems or light rail systems operating wholly on dedicated rights of way. In Europe, tram-trains began running on the streets in cities and on railway lines in the suburbs and countryside in the mid-late 20th century.

Netherlands[link]

NZH trams in 1959

The Netherlands used to have an extensive "tram-system" that came very close to the American-style interurban. The standard gauge NZH trams in the area between The Hague, Leiden and Haarlem were fairly big electric trams running on 1200 volt with in-street running in towns and quite a lot of private right-of-way outside towns. Especially the "Budapester" trams (see picture) resembled American interurban cars. A typical tram was made up by coupling a motorised unit (A400 or A500 series) with one or two trailers (B400/B500). In common with American practice the NZH also had local streetcar lines in The Hague, Leiden and Haarlem sharing some of the track with the interurban routes. Power supply was entirely by overhead wire. Although there was a connection between tram and train tracks in Leiden it was not possible to convey railway cars on NZH track due to differing track and wheel geometry, curve radius and loading gauge. The A/B600 series of twin-cars, built around 1930, resemble those of Oaklands Key System 'Bridge Units' built slightly later.

Part of the NZH system was built to metre-gauge. In the 1920s the same "Budapester" interurbans were bought for use here (with narrower wheel-sets of course). It was envisioned that some of this track would be converted to standard gauge at a later date but the axe fell before this could occur. Because the terminus of one of these lines was at Spui in the centre of Amsterdam (where the streetcars use standard gauge) some three-rail track (combined standard/narrow gauge) existed there. Long after the demise of the NZH-interurbans the tree-rail track was still present in some streets with interesting pointwork where streets crossed.

1908 Interurban-style car of the Hofplein-line, preserved in the Dutch Railway Museum, Utrecht

Nowadays few lines remain, one of which is Line 1 of HTM, running from Scheveningen to Delft. NZH turned into a bus company and in 1999 was taken over by Connexxion. However Connexxion also runs the light-rail line from Utrecht to Nieuwegein that was built around 1980 but has roots in the steam-tram era. In addition, until 2006 Nederlandse Spoorwegen ran two regional lines between The Hague and Rotterdam Hofplein/Zoetemeer as a train (heavy-rail) service, and these were then transformed into Randstadrail, a concept similar to the old interurbans. Interestingly this "Hofplein-line" started early 20th century as a separate company (ZHESM) modelled after the American style interurbans (running fully electric multiple-unit trains right from the start) but was included into the nationalised rail system later on.

Belgium[link]

The Belgian Vicinal tramway system had many characteristics of the American interurban, although operating speeds and vehicle comfort were only comparable on a few of the more important services. The main surviving section is the Belgian Coast Tram, which has been in service since 1885. With 70 stations along its 68-kilometre line, connecting the cities and towns along the entire Belgian (West Flanders) coastline, it is the longest tram line in the world. Some other sections were absorbed into urban tramway systems, especially in Charleroi.

Czech Republic[link]

Two interurban lines exist, both connected to city street car systems, the Liberec-Jablonec line and the Most-Litvinov line. The Liberec-Jablonec line is notable for being metre-gauge.

Germany[link]

Stadtbahn between Cologne and Bonn

In Germany, Interurbans that fit the whole definition were uncommon. However, in many instances the definition is almost met.

One of these cases are the many early secondary (connecting) railway lines that were built in the onset of the 20th century. Many of them were street-running in urban and suburban areas while using a dedicated right of way in less populated areas. Those lines were usually operated with mainline stock, however very few were electrified. Most of them have disappeared or were moved onto a fully dedicated right-of-way due to increasing street traffic and safety concerns. One of the few such railway lines still in service is the steam operated narrow-gauge Molli train between Bad Doberan and Kühlungsborn West on the shore of the Baltic Sea in the north-eastern state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern which is street-running inside Bad Doberan and has its own right-of-way on the rest of the line.

Another not uncommon case are interurban tramways. Germany has numerous areas where several larger cities are clustered together, and there were always places not served by mainline railway lines. Often urban tramways companies jumped at the opportunity and built over-land tramway lines, sometimes linking two existing tramway networks together. Those lines were run with standard tramway cars. The most extensive system was the originally German Silesian interurbans.

After World War II these Interurban tramways were modernised and now dubbed Stadtbahn. All of them are street-running in city areas and use a dedicated right-of-way between cities, and all of them are electrified. Rolling stock used is either standard tramcars or special heavier cars which still qualify for tramway use in street-running lines as regulated in BOStrab. Generally, the Stadtbahn systems fit the definition of an interurban once their network leaves city boundaries. This is especially true for the ones which run both in the streets and on true railway (often S-Bahn) tracks. This requires two power systems (German: Zweisystemstadtbahn): Both the common 600 V DC tram voltage, and the 15 kV AC used by German railways. On the railway tracks, they run at up to 114 km/h. Such Tram-train systems are constructed in cities like Karlsruhe and Kassel, later also in countries outside Germany like Spain and France.

One particularly large effort was the Stadtbahn Rhein-Ruhr, which was meant to grow to a length of 300 km (190 mi), spanning over 10 cities of the Ruhrgebiet industrial area, building upon already existing interurban and urban tramway lines. Although those plans were later abandoned due to exploding costs, 17 Stadtbahn lines between Krefeld in the west and Dortmund in the east were finished, and today one can travel from Krefeld to Bochum without using a single mainline train. The only link missing is between Bochum and Dortmund.

Poland[link]

In Poland interurban tram lines - in addition to the Silesian interurbans - exist in Łódź agglomeration. They were built before first world war and served Ozorków, Zgierz, Pabianice, Konstantynow, Lutomiersk, Aleksandrów and Tuszyn. Today the first four of these are still active. The line to Ozorków is 38 km long, the second longest in the world after the Belgian coastal tram line.

Switzerland[link]

Switzerland has a large number of interurban electric rail lines, usually narrow gauge. Some are operated by Swiss Federal Railways, but most are privately owned companies or are Canton (County) owned. Examples are the Bierre-Apples-Morges line that operates north from Morges on Lake Geneva, known as BAM locally. The Nyon-St Cergue-LeCure line operates north from Nyon on Lake Geneva and is known as NStCM. Nyon is just east of municipal Geneva. Interurbans operated by the City/District of Aigle go primarily to ski resorts: Aigle to Leysin; Aigle to Ollon - Monthey - Champéry; Aigle to Sépey - Les Diablerets - Bex - Villars - Bretaye. Aigle, population 8,100 people, is 13 km southeast of Montreux at the foot of the Alps.

Isle of Man[link]

The Manx Electric Railway survives after over 100 years of service using mainly original equipment. It links Douglas with Ramsey. The Snaefell Mountain Railway links the M.E.R with the summit of Snaefell the highest point on the island.

Asia[link]

Japan[link]

Influence of the United States[link]

In Japan, no clear distinction of the interurban from the ordinal heavy rail has been settled, but most of the major private railway companies, which now play important role in public transportation, had been influenced greatly by the systems of U.S. interurbans, such as motors and controllers of General Electric, Westinghouse Electric, air brakes of Westinghouse Air Brake Company, trucks of J. G. Brill Company and Baldwin Locomotive Works, just to name some.

Pioneers[link]

The first interurban in Japan was the Hanshin Electric Railway's main line, which opened in 1905 between Osaka and Kobe. In the Greater Tokyo area in the same year, the present Keihin Electric Express Railway (Keikyū) extended its main line to the station of Kanagawa in Yokohama, to connect Tokyo. The followers of this earlier period were Keihan Electric Railway's main line between Kyoto and Osaka in 1910, Nagoya Electric Railway (present Nagoya Railroad) in Nagoya to surrounding towns such as Inuyama (present Inuyama Line) and Tsushima (Tsushima Line). The latter had operated through to the center of Nagoya via streetcar tracks, though the former had planned so in Osaka but the administrating authority refused permission.

Second generation[link]

The second boom of Japanese interurbans occurred in the 1920s and 1930s, unlike the counterparts in the US that declined during that period. The difference between the two countries is the extent of motorization; in Japan, private automobiles remained uncommon until the 1960s. The operators of this generation built their exclusive tracks with heavier rail (e.g. 100 lb. per yard) and fewer curves, and they rarely laid tracks on roads.

In Kansai region, mostly from Osaka:

• Kobe Line of Hanshin Kyūkō Railway (present Hankyu Corporation)

  competing Hanshin's Main Line in the same region

• Kobe - Himeji Electric Railway

  western half of the main line of present Sanyo Electric Railway connecting Akashi and Himeji

• Shin-Keihan Railway

  concurrent to Keihan, later transferred to Hankyū

• Hanwa Electric Railway

  later merged to the governmental network under wartime condition, presently Hanwa Line

• Osaka Electric Tramway's main line (present Kintetsu)

  for Nara

• Nara Electric Railway's line (presently Kintetsu)

  Kyoto and Nara

• Sangū Kyūkō Electric Railway

  Together with Osaka Electric Tramway line, from Osaka to Ise, exceeding 100 km in distance

In Tokyo:

• Tōbu Railway' Nikkō Line

  preceding main line Isesaki Line applied steam traction, but a long branch to Nikkō was built electrified, more than 100 km from terminus Asakusa in Tokyo on the main line.

• Odawara Express Railway's main line (present Odakyu)

  to Odawara

• Tokyo Yokohama Electric Railway's Tōyoko Line (present Tokyu Corporation)

  to Yokohama

• Keisei Electric Railway's main line

  to Narita

In other regions

• Aichi Electric Railway's main line (eastern half of present Nagoya Railroad's Nagoya Main Line)

  Nagoya to Toyohashi

• Kyūshū Railway (2nd) (present Tenjin Ōmuta Line (Nishitetsu)

  Fukuoka to Ōmuta

Development[link]

Odakyu Odawara Line is an example of the evolution that many Japanese interurbans have undergone

During the Japanese post-war economic miracle (1955–1975), rapid urbanizations increased the traffic and required the capacity expansion. Descendants of interurbans responded by:

• Extending the length of platforms to accommodate longer trains.
• Acquiring higher capacity, metro-like trains.
• Operating Trains at smaller headways.
• Interoperating with subway lines.
• doubling, tripling, or quadrupling their tracks.
• grade separating their lines.

Nowadays, most notability in and around Tokyo and Osaka, companies such as Keikyū, Tōbu, Odakyū, and Hankyu operate trains of 200 m length and tend to resemble Commuter rail.

See also[link]

• Box motor, an interurban specifically built for freight transport. Purchased from a builder, but often a former interurban coach rebuilt and regeared in company shops.
• Boxcab, another style of electric locomotive
• Interurban streetcars in Southern New England
• Light rail, light railway transportation in general, as opposed to "heavy" freight or standard modern passenger trains. Usually means recently built lines.
• List of interurbans
• Railway electrification
• Rapid transit
• Steeplecab, a style of electric locomotive popular on interurban lines for freight service. Built by General Electric, competitor Baldwin-Westinghouse, or by the interurban's own shops. See Illinois Terminal for unique homebuilds.
• Streetcar suburb
• Tram (also called streetcar or trolley)

Notes[link]

References[link]

This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2009)

• Hilton, George, and Due, John F. (1960 reissued 2000). The Electric Interurban Railways in America. Stanford, California: 375 pp., Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-4014-3. 
• Middleton, Wm D., The Interurban Era, 432pp. Kalmbach Publishing Co., Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 1961, reissued 2003. (ISBN 0-89024-003-5) Library of Congress 61-10728
• Middleton, Wm D, Traction Classics Vol I: The Great Wood and Steel Cars, 248pp, 1983.
• Middleton, Traction Classics Vol II: Extra Fast and Extra Fare, 179 pp, 1985.
• Middleton, Traction Classics Vol III: The Interurban's Interurban Freight, 182pp, 1985, Golden West Books, San Marino, California. (ISBN 9789-870950-858)
• Middleton, Wm D, The Last Interurbans, 234pp. Central Electric Railfans' Association Bulletin #136, Chicago, Illinois., 2003. (ISBN 978-0915348-367)
• Middleton, Wm D. (1967). Time of the Trolley. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.: Kalmbach Publishing. 
• Rowsome, Frank (1954). Trolley Car Treasury, 200pp. NYC, New York: Bonanza Books. ISBN Library of Congress 56-11054. 
• Bradley, George, Indiana Railroad: The Magic Interurban, 224pp, 1984. Central Electric Railfans Association Bulletin #128, Chicago, Illinois. (ISBN 091-5348-284)
• Keenan, Jack, Cincinnati and Lake Erie Railroad, 226pp, 1974. Golden West Books, San Marino, California. (ISBN 9780-87095-0551)
• Demoro, Harre, California's Electric Railways. (ISBN 091-6374-742)
• Demoro, Harre, Swett, et al., Sacramento Northern: Through the Sacramento Valley, 206pp, 1998. Interurban Press Bulletin #26 reissue. (ISBN 978-0916374-471)
• Trimble, Paul, Sacramento Northern, 2005. Arcadia Publishing. (ISBN 073-8530-522)
• Rowsome, Frank Jr. (1956). Trolley Car Treasury, 199 pp.. NY, New York.: Bonanza Books.  (Lib Congress 56-11054)
• Volkmer, Wm. D., and King, LeRoy (2003.). "Pennsylvania Trolleys in Color", Vol. I Anthracite and Pennsylvania Dutch Country, ISBN 1-878887-77-7; Vol. II Philadelphia Region, ISBN 1-878887-99-8, Vol. III, Vol. IV The 1940s, ISBN 1-58248-117-2. Scotch Plains, New Jersey.: Morning Sun books. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/1-58248-117-1|1-58248-117-1]]. 
• McKelvey, Jr. Wm. (1988.). Lehigh Valley Transit Company's Liberty Bell Route- A Photographic History= 300 photographs. 
• Swett, Ira L., plus others (1943 to 1988). Ninety-seven softcover publications about U.S. interurbans and electric railroads. Interurban Press, Glendale, California. 
• Swett, Ira L. (1953 to 1957). Pacific Electric Railway Northern District; PE Southern District; PE Western District; Cars of the Pacific Electric (4 separate volumes plus addenda). Interurbans, Glendale, California. 
• Swett, Ira L.. The Sacramento Northern Ry, Interurbans Press Special #26, 1971; Cars of Sacramento Northern, Special #32, 1963; Sacramento Northern Album, Special #34, 1963. Glendale, California: Interurbans. 
• Swett, Ira L. (1954, reissue 1974). Interurbans of Utah, Interurbans Special #15, and Bamberger Railroad, Special #4, (1946). Glendale, California: Interurbans. 
• Various authors. Central Electric Railfans' Association, published by CERA as Bulletin #; Illinois Traction System Bulletin #98; Electric Railways of Indiana B#101, #102, #104; Interurban to Milwaukee B#106; Route of the Electroliners B#107; West Penn Traction B#110; Badger Traction B#111; Iowa Trolleys B#114; Remember When Trolley Wires Spanned the Country B#119; Texas Electric Ry B#121; A Rainbow of Traction B#126; Washington Baltimore and Annapolis, Every Hour on the Hour B#130. and many others.. 
• Jackson, Walter (1914). Electric Car Maintenance: Selected from the Electric Railway Journal. McGraw-Hill. http://books.google.com/books?id=kXg5AAAAMAAJ. 
• Springirth, Kenneth, Suburban Philadelphia Trolleys 128pp. Arcadia Publishing, 2007. Chicago, Illinois.(ISBN 978-0-7385-5043-5)
• Meyers, Allen, Spivak, Joel, Philadelphia Trolleys 128pp. Arcadia Publishing, 2004. (ISBN 0-7385-1226-5)
• Schramm, Jack E., William H. Henning and Richard R. Andrews. When Eastern Michigan Rode the Rails: Transit across Michigan by interurban, train, bus. Interurban Press: Glendale, California, 1988. ISBN 0-916374-65-3

External links[link]

Picture of an interurban rail service that was restored after the 1915 Galveston Hurricane at the University of Houston Digital Library