Lolita is a 1962 comedy-drama film by Stanley Kubrick based on the classic novel of the same title by Vladimir Nabokov, centred around a middle-aged man who becomes obsessed with a teenage girl. The film stars James Mason as Humbert Humbert, Sue Lyon as Dolores Haze (Lolita) and Shelley Winters as Charlotte Haze with Peter Sellers as Clare Quilty.
Due to the MPAA's restrictions at the time, the film toned down the more provocative aspects of the novel, sometimes leaving much to the audience's imagination. The actress who played Lolita, Sue Lyon, was fourteen at the time of filming. Kubrick later commented that, had he realized how severe the censorship limitations were going to be, he probably never would have made the film.
Set in the 1950s, the film begins in medias res with a confrontation between two men: one of them, Clare Quilty (Peter Sellers), drunk and incoherent, plays Chopin's Polonaises Op. 40 on the piano before being shot. The shooter is Humbert Humbert (James Mason), a 40-something British professor of French literature.
The film then flashes back to events four years earlier. Humbert arrives in Ramsdale, New Hampshire, intending to spend the summer before his professorship begins at Beardsley College, Ohio. He searches for a room to let, and Charlotte Haze (Shelley Winters)—a blowsy, sexually frustrated widow—invites him to stay at her house. He declines until seeing her daughter, Dolores (Sue Lyon), affectionately called "Lolita." Lolita is a soda-pop drinking, gum-snapping, overtly flirtatious teenager, with whom Humbert falls in love.
To be close to Lolita, Humbert accepts Charlotte's offer and becomes a lodger in the Haze household. But Charlotte wants all of "Hum's" time for herself and soon announces she will be sending Lolita to an all-girl sleepaway camp for the summer. After the Hazes depart for camp, the maid gives Humbert a letter from Charlotte, confessing her love for him and demanding he vacate at once unless he feels the same way. The letter says that if Humbert is still in the house when she returns, Charlotte will know her love is requited, and he must marry her. Though he roars with laughter while reading the sadly heartfelt yet characteristically overblown letter, Humbert marries Charlotte.
Things turn sour for the couple in the absence of the nymphet: glum Humbert becomes more withdrawn, and brassy Charlotte more whiny. Charlotte discovers Humbert’s diary entries detailing his passion for Lolita and characterizing her as "the Haze cow, the noxious mama, the brainless baba". She has an hysterical outburst and, while Humbert hurriedly fixes martinis in the kitchen to smooth over the situation, she runs outside, is hit by a car and dies.
Humbert drives to Camp Climax to pick up Lolita, who doesn't yet know her mother is dead. They stay the night in a hotel that is handling an overflow influx of police officers attending a convention. One of the guests, a pushy, abrasive stranger insinuates himself upon Humbert and keeps steering the conversation to his "beautiful little daughter," who is asleep upstairs. The stranger implies that he too is a policeman and repeats, too often, that he thinks Humbert is "normal." Humbert escapes the man's advances, and, the next morning, Humbert and Lolita enter into a sexual relationship. The two commence an odyssey across the United States, traveling from hotel to motel. In public, they act as father and daughter. After several days, Humbert tells Lolita that her mother is not sick in a hospital, as he had previously told her, but dead. Grief-stricken, she stays with Humbert.
In the fall, Humbert reports to his position at Beardsley College, and enrolls Lolita in high school there. Before long, people begin to wonder about the relationship between father and his over-protected daughter. Humbert worries about her involvement with the school play and with male classmates. One night he returns home to find Dr. Zempf, a pushy, abrasive stranger, sitting in his darkened living room. Zempf, speaking with a thick German accent, claims to be from Lolita's school and wants to discuss her knowledge of "the facts of life." Humbert is frightened and decides to take Lolita on the road again. He soon realizes they are being followed by a mysterious car that never drops away but never quite catches up. When Lolita becomes sick, he takes her to the hospital. However, when he returns to pick her up, she is gone. The nurse there tells him she left with another man claiming to be her uncle and Humbert, devastated, is left without a single clue as to her disappearance or whereabouts.
Some years later, Humbert receives a letter from Mrs. Richard T. Schiller, Lolita's married name. She writes that she is now married to a man named Dick, and that she is pregnant and in desperate need of money. Humbert travels to their home, where Lolita waits. Humbert finds that she is now a roundly pregnant woman in glasses leading a pleasant, humdrum life. Humbert demands that she tell him who kidnapped her three years earlier. She tells him it was Clare Quilty, the man that was following them, who is a famous playwright and with whom her mother had a fling in Ramsdale days. She states Quilty is also the one who disguised himself as Dr. Zempf, the pushy stranger who kept crossing their path. Lolita herself carried on an affair with him and left with him when he promised her glamor. However, he then demanded she join his depraved lifestyle, including acting in his "art" films.
Humbert begs Lolita to leave her husband and come away with him, but she declines. Humbert gives Lolita $13,000, explaining that it's hers from the sale of her mother's house, and leaves to shoot Quilty in his mansion, where the film began. The epilogue explains that Humbert died of coronary thrombosis awaiting trial for Quilty's murder.
- James Mason as Humbert Humbert, a professor of French Poetry. He is smooth, charming, self-assured, but condescending and insensitive. He becomes immediately infatuated with Lolita upon meeting her. Secretly, this motivates him to stay with Charlotte Haze, although he regards her as superficial.
- Sue Lyon as Dolores "Lolita" Haze. She is at first flirtatious with Humbert and competes with her mother for his affections. However, after their relationship has commenced, she is increasingly unresponsive to his pressing demands, resists his attempts to educate her into high culture, and eventually finds him a suffocating and overbearing presence.
- Peter Sellers as Clare Quilty. The character's role was greatly expanded from that in the novel and Kubrick allowed Sellers to adopt a variety of disguises throughout the film. Early on in the film, Quilty appears as himself: a conceited, avant-garde playwright with a superior manner. Later, he disguises himself as various personae. First, he is an inquisitive policeman on the porch of the hotel where Humbert and Lolita are staying. Next he is the intrusive Beardsley High School psychologist, Doctor Zempf, who lurks in Humbert's front room for the purpose of persuading him to give Lolita more freedom in her after-school activities.[2] Later in the film he is an anonymous phone caller conducting a survey.
- Shelley Winters as Charlotte Haze-Humbert, a loud, overbearing, status-seeking widow who is both landlady to Humbert, and mother to Lolita with whom she has a strained relationship. She aspires to be cultured and sophisticated, but never manages to be more than a middle-class householder. When she develops a romantic interest in Humbert, she makes pushy advances parried by his barely concealed sarcasm and indifference.
- Gary Cockrell as "Dick" Schiller
- Jerry Stovin as John Farlow (Ramsdale lawyer)
- Diana Decker as Jean Farlow
- Lois Maxwell as Nurse Mary Lore (at the hospital)
- Cec Linder as Dr. Keegee (at hospital)
- Bill Greene as George Swine (hotel night manager in Bryceton)
- Shirley Douglas as Mrs. Starch (piano teacher in Ramsdale)
- Marianne Stone as Vivian Darkbloom, Quilty's frequent companion and co-conspirator
- Marion Mathie as Miss Lebone
- James Dyrenforth as Frederick Beale Sr.
- Maxine Holden as Miss Fromkiss (hospital receptionist)
- John Harrison as Tom
- C. Denier Warren as Potts
James Mason was the first choice of director Stanley Kubrick and producer James B. Harris for the role of Humbert Humbert, but he initially declined due to a Broadway engagement. Laurence Olivier then refused the part, apparently on the advice of his agents. Kubrick considered Peter Ustinov, but decided against him. Harris then suggested David Niven; Niven accepted the part, but then withdrew for fear the sponsors of his TV show, Four Star Playhouse (1952), would object. Mason then withdrew from his play and got the part. Harris denies claims that Noël Coward also rejected the role.[3]
Tuesday Weld was considered for the role of Lolita.[3] Hayley Mills also turned down the role. At the time, her father, John Mills was credited with the decision; later, Walt Disney.[3] Stanley Kubrick originally wanted Joey Heatherton for the title role of Lolita, but her father, Ray Heatherton, said no for fear his daughter would be typecast as a "promiscuous sex kitten."[3] Jill Haworth was asked to take the role, but she was under contract to Otto Preminger and he said 'no.'[4]
With Nabokov’s consent, Kubrick changed the order in which events unfolded by moving what was the novel’s ending to the start of the film, a literary device known as in medias res. Kubrick determined that while this sacrificed a great ending, it helped maintain interest, as he believed that interest in the novel sagged halfway through once Humbert was successful in seducing Lolita.[5]
The second half contains an odyssey across the United States and though the novel was set in the 1940s Kubrick gave it a contemporary setting, shooting many of the exterior scenes in England with some back-projected scenery shot in America, including upstate eastern New York, along NY 9N in the eastern Adirondacks, and a hilltop view of Albany from Rensselaer on the east bank of the Hudson. Some of the minor parts were played by Canadian and American actors, such as Cec Linder, Lois Maxwell, Jerry Stovin and Diana Decker, who were based in England at the time. Kubrick had to film in England as much of the money to finance the movie was not only raised there but also had to be spent there.[5]
File:KubrickLolita2.jpg
In this scene from the film, Humbert plays chess with Lolita's mother as Lolita kisses Humbert goodnight. His line in the scene is "I take your Queen" suggestive of his designs on her daughter. Chess is a recurrent motif in the novels of Nabokov and a favorite pastime of director Stanley Kubrick.
The moral values and censorship of the time inhibited Kubrick's direction. Kubrick commented that, “because of all the pressure over the Production Code and the Catholic Legion of Decency at the time, I believe I didn't sufficiently dramatize the erotic aspect of Humbert's relationship with Lolita. If I could do the film over again, I would have stressed the erotic component of their relationship with the same weight Nabokov did.”[5] Instead Kubrick hinted at the nature of their relationship indirectly through double entendre and visual cues. In a 1972 Newsweek interview, Kubrick said that had he realized how severe the censorship limitations were going to be, he "probably wouldn't have made the film."[6]
Lolita's age was raised to fourteen, as Kubrick believed that this was the right age. He commented, “I think that some people had the mental picture of a nine-year-old, but Lolita was twelve and a half in the book; Sue Lyon was thirteen.” (Actually, Lyon was 14 at the time of filming: she was born in July 1946[7] and it was shot between November 1960 and May 1961.[8])
When released, Lolita was Rated BBFC X by the British Board of Film Censors, meaning no one under 16 years of age was permitted in theaters where it was showing.[9]
Humbert uses the term 'nymphet' to describe Lolita, which he explains in, and uses throughout, the novel; it only appears once in the movie and its meaning is left undefined.[10] In a voiceover on the morning after the Ramsdale High School dance, Humbert confides in his diary, “What drives me insane is the twofold nature of this nymphet, of every nymphet perhaps, this mixture in my Lolita of tender, dreamy childishness and a kind of eerie vulgarity. I know it is madness to keep this journal, but it gives me a strange thrill to do so. And only a loving wife could decipher my microscopic script.”
This voiceover is a part of Humbert’s narration, which was central to the novel. Kubrick uses it sparingly and, apart from the above comment, only to set the scene for the film’s next act. Humbert’s comments are generally simple statements of fact, spiced with the odd personal reflection.
The only other one of these reflections which makes reference to Humbert’s feelings towards Lolita is made after their move from Ramsdale to Beardsley. Here Humbert's comment seems to show only an interest in her education and cultural development: “Six months have passed and Lolita is attending an excellent school where it is my hope that she will be persuaded to read other things than comic books and movie romances”.
The narration begins after the opening scenes but ceases once the odyssey begins. Kubrick makes no attempt to explain Humbert's fascination with Lolita, which a full narration would have done, but merely treats it as a matter of fact.
The screenplay is credited to Nabokov, although very little of what he provided (later published in a shortened version) was used. Nabokov remained polite about the film in public, but in a 1962 interview, before seeing the film, commented that it may turn out to be "the swerves of a scenic drive as perceived by the horizontal passenger of an ambulance".[11]
Lolita was filmed again in 1997, directed by Adrian Lyne. The film was widely publicized as being more faithful to Nabokov than the Kubrick film. Although many observed this was the case (such as Erica Jong writing in The New York Observer),[12] the film was not as well received as Kubrick's version, and was a major box office bomb, grossing only $1 million at the US box office.
The music for the film was composed by Nelson Riddle. The recurring dance number first heard on the radio when Humbert meets Lolita in the garden later became a hit single under the name "Lolita Ya Ya" with Sue Lyon credited with the singing on the single version.[13] The flip side was a 60s-style light rock song called "Turn off the Moon" also sung by Sue Lyon. "Lolita Ya Ya" was later recorded by other bands- it was also a hit single for "The Ventures" [14] reaching 61 on Billboard and then being included on many of their compilation albums.[15] In his biography of The Ventures, Del Halterman quotes an unnamed reviewer of the CD rerelease of the original Lolita soundtrack as saying "The highlight is the most frivolous track, 'Lolita Ya Ya', a maddeningly vapid and catchy instrumental with nonsense vocals that comes across as a simultaneously vicious and good-humored parody of the kitschiest elements of early-sixties rock and roll."
The tune was also recorded by Mexican guitarist Diego de Cossío, appearing recently on his Mexican-label released CD Guitarra Magica de Diego de Cossio: Los Dorados 60's ("The Golden '60s"). As with many of his guitar adaptations, Diego de Cossio gave the melody a Spanish sensibility.
There are many differences between Kubrick's film adaptation and Nabokov's novel, including some events that were entirely omitted. Most of the sexually explicit innuendos, references and episodes in the book were taken out of the film due to the strict censorship of the 1960s; the sexual relationship between Lolita and Humbert is implied and never depicted graphically on the screen. In addition, some events in the film do not match those of the novel exactly, and there are also differences in Lolita's character. Some of the differences are listed below:
Lolita's age was raised from twelve to early teens in the film to meet the MPAA standards. As such, Sue Lyon was chosen for the title role partly due to her more mature appearance. Stanley Kubrick had been warned that censors felt strongly about the use of a less developed actress to portray a sexually active girl that was to seem at least fourteen.[3]
The name "Lolita" is used only by Humbert as a private pet nickname in the novel, whereas in the film several of the characters refer to her by that name. In the book she is referred to simply as "Lo" or "Lola" or "Dolly" by the other characters. Various critics such as Susan Sweeney have observed that since she never calls herself "Lolita", Humbert's pet name denies her subjectivity.[16] Generally, the novel gives little information about her feelings.
Likewise, the film is not especially focused on Lolita's feelings. In the medium of film, her character is inevitably fleshed out somewhat from the enigmatic cipher that she remains in the novel. Nonetheless, Kubrick actually omits the few vignettes in the novel in which Humbert's sollipsistic bubble is burst and one catches glimpses of Lolita's personal misery. Susan Bordo writes "Kubrick chose not to include any of the vignettes from the novel which bring Lolita's misery to the forefront, nudging Humbert's obsession temporarily off center-stage....Nabokov's wife insisted on 'the pathos of Lolita's utter loneliness'...In Kubrick's film, one good sobfest and dead mommy is forgotten. Humbert, to calm her down, has promised her...The same scene in the novel ends with Lolita sobbing despite Humbert having plied her with gifts all day."[17] Bardo goes on to say "Emphasizing Lolita's sadness and loss would not have jibed of course with the film's dedication to inflecting the "dark" with the comic; it would have altered the overwhelmingly ironic, anti-sentimental character of the movie." When the novel briefly gives us evidence of Lolita's sadness and misery, Humbert glosses over it, but the film omits nearly all of these episodes entirely.
In the foreword of the novel, it mentions indirectly that Dolores Haze died giving birth to a stillborn baby. (In this section of the foreword she is only referred to as Mrs. Richard Schiller, prior to the reader having enough information to identify this as Dolores.) It says nothing of this in the film's epilogue.
Critic Greg Jenkins believes that Humbert is imbued with a fundamental likability in this film that he does not necessarily have in the novel.[18] He has a debonair quality in the film, while in the novel he can be perceived as much more repulsive. Humbert's two mental breakdowns leading to sanitorium stays before meeting Lolita are entirely omitted in the film, as are his earlier unsuccessful relationships with women his own age (whom he refers to in the novel as "terrestial women") through which he tried to stabilize himself. His lifelong complexes around young girls are largely concealed in the film, and Lolita appears older than her novelistic counterpart, both leading Jenkins to comment "A story originally told from the edge of a moral abyss is fast moving toward safer ground".[19] In short, the novel early flags Humbert as both mentally unsound and obsessively infatuated with young girls in a way the film never does.
Jenkins notes that Humbert even seems a bit more dignified and restrained than other residents of Ramsdale, particularly Lolita's aggressive mother, in a way that invites the audience to sympathize with Humbert. Humbert is portrayed as someone urbane and sophisticated trapped in a provincial small town populated by slightly lecherous people, a refugee from Old World Europe in an especially crass part of the New World. For example, Lolita's piano teacher comes across in the film as aggressive and predatory compared to which Humbert seems fairly restrained.[20] The film character of John Farlow talks suggestively of "swapping partners" at a dance in a way that repels Humbert. Jenkins believes that in the film it is Quilty, not Humbert, who acts as the embodiment of evil.[21] The expansion of Quilty's character and the way Quilty torments Humbert also invite audience to sympathize to Humbert.
Because Humbert narrates the novel, his increased mental deterioration due to anxiety in the entire second half of the story is more obvious from the increasingly desperate tone of his narrative. While the film shows Humbert's increasingly severe attempts to control Lolita, but the novel shows more of Humbert's loss of self-control and stability.
Jenkins also notes that some of Humbert's more brutal actions are omitted or changed from the film. For example, in the novel he threatens to send Lolita to a reformatory, while in the film he promises to never send her there.[22] He also notes that Humbert's narrative style in the novel, although elegant, is wordy, rambling, and roundabout, whereas in the film it is "subdued and measured".[23]
The film entirely omits the critical episode in Humbert's life in which at age 14 he was interrupted making love to young Annabel Leigh who shortly thereafter died, and consequently omits all indications that Humbert had a preoccupation with prepubescent girls prior to meeting Dolores Haze. In the novel, Humbert gives his youthful amorous relationship with Annabel Leigh, thwarted by both adult intervention and her death, as the key to his obsession with nymphets. The film's only mention of "nymphets" is an entry in Humbert's diary specifically revolving around Lolita.
Humbert explains that the smell and taste of youth filled his desires throughout adulthood: "that little girl with her seaside limbs and ardent tongue haunted [him] ever since".[24] He thus claims that "Lolita began with Annabel"[25] and that Annabel's spell was broken by "incarnating her in another".[24]
The idea that anything connected with young girls motivated Humbert to accept the job as professor of French Literature at Beardsley College and move to Ramsdale at all is entirely omitted from the film. In the novel he first finds accommodations with the McCoo family. He accepts the professorship because the McCoos have a twelve-year-old daughter, a potential "enigmatic nymphet whom [he] would coach in French and fondle in Humbertish".[26] However, the McCoo house happens to burn down in the few days prior to his arrival, and this is when Mrs. Haze offers to accommodate Humbert.
Susan Bardo has noticed that in order to show the callous and cruel side of Humbert's personality early in the film, Nabokov and Kubrick have shown additional ways in which Humbert behaves monstrously towards her mother, Charlotte Haze. He mocks her declaration of love towards him, and takes a pleasant bath after her accidental death. This effectively replaces the voiceovers in which he discusses his plans to seduce and molest Lolita as a means of establishing Humbert as manipulative, scheming, and selfish.[27] However, Greg Jenkins has noted that Humbert's response to Charlotte's lovenote in the film is still much kinder than that in the novel, and that the film goes to significant lengths to make Charlotte unlikable.
Quilty's role is greatly magnified in the film and brought into the foreground of the narrative. In the novel Humbert catches only brief uncomprehending glimpses of his nemesis before their final confrontation at Quilty's home, and the reader finds out about Quilty late in the narrative along with Humbert. Quilty's role in the story is made fully explicit from the beginning of the film, rather than being a concealed surprise twist near the end of the tale. In a 1962 interview with Terry Southern, Kubrick describes his decision to expand Quilty's role, saying "just beneath the surface of the story was this strong secondary narrative thread possible--because after Humbert seduces her in the motel, or rather after she seduces him, the the [sic] big question has been answered--so it was good to have this narrative of mystery continuing after the seduction."[28] This magnifies the book's theme of Quilty as a dark double of Humbert, mirroring all of Humbert's worst qualities, a theme which preoccupied Kubrick.[29]
The film opens with a scene near the end of the story, Humbert's murder of Quilty. This means that the film shows Humbert as a murderer before showing us Humbert as a seducer of minors, and the film sets up the viewer to frame the following flashback as an explanation for the murder. The film then goes back to Humbert's first meeting with Charlotte Haze and continues chronologically until the final murder scene is presented once again. The book, narrated by Humbert, presents events in chronological order from the very beginning, opening with Humbert's life as a child. While Humbert hints throughout the novel that he has committed murder, its actual circumstances are not described until near the very end. NPR's Bret Anthony Johnston notes that the novel is sort of an inverted murder mystery- you know someone has been killed, but you have to wait to find out who the victim is.[30] Similarly, the online Doubleday publisher's reading guide to Lolita notes "he mystery of Quilty’s identity turns this novel into a kind of detective story (in which the protagonist is both detective and criminal)."[31] This effect is, of course, lost in the Kubrick film.
In the novel, Miss Pratt, the school principal at Beardsley, discusses with Humbert Dolores's behavioral issues and among other things persuades Humbert to allow her to participate in the dramatics group, especially one upcoming play. In the film, this role is replaced by Quilty disguised as a school psychologist named "Dr. Zempf." This disguise does not appear in the novel at all. In both versions, a claim is made that Lolita appears to be "sexually repressed," as she mysteriously has no interest in boys. Both Dr. Zempf and Miss Pratt express the opinion that this aspect of her youth should be developed and stimulated by dating and participating in the school's social activities. While Pratt mostly wants Humbert to let Dolores generally into the dramatic group, Quilty (as Zempf) is specifically focused on the high school play (written by Quilty and produced with some supervision from him) which Lolita had secretly rehearsed for (in both the film and novel). In the novel Miss Pratt naïvely believes this talk about Dolores' "sexual repression", while Quilty in his disguise knows the truth. Although Peter Sellers is playing only one character in this film, Quilty's disguise as Dr. Zempf allows him to employ a mock German accent that is quintessentially in the style of Sellers's acting.[32]
With regard to this scene, playwright Edward Albee's 1981 stage adaptation of the novel follows Kubrick's film rather than the novel.
The movie retains the novel's theme of Quilty (anonymously) goading Humbert's conscience on many occasions, though the details of how this theme is played out are quite different in the film. He has been described as "an emanation of Humbert's guilty conscience",[33] and Humbert describes Quilty in the novel as his "shadow".[34]
The first and last word of the novel is "Lolita".[35] As film critic Greg Jenkins has noted, in contrast to the novel, the first and last word of the screenplay is "Quilty".[36]
- In the novel, Humbert and Charlotte go swimming in Hourglass Lake, where Charlotte announces she will ship Lo off to a good boarding school; that part takes place in bed in the film. Humbert's contemplation of possibly killing Charlotte similarly takes place at Hourglass Lake in the book, but at home in the film. This difference affects Humbert's contemplated method of killing Charlotte. In the film he considers the possibility of shooting her with a pistol whilst in the house, whereas in the book he is tempted to drown her in the lake before, as in both scenarios, concluding that he could never bring himself to do it. In his biography of Kubrick, Vincent LoBrutto notes that Kubrick tried to recreate Hourglass Lake in a studio, but become uncomfortable shooting such a pivotally important exterior scene in the studio, so he refashioned the scene to take place at home.[37] Susan Bardo notes that after Charlotte's actual death in the film, two neighbors see Humbert's gun and falsely conclude Humbert is contemplating suicide, while in fact he had been considering killing Charlotte with it.[38]
- The same attempted killing of Charlotte appears in the "Deleted Scenes" section of the DVD of the 1997 film (now put back at Hourglass Lake). In the novel Humbert really considers killing Charlotte and later Lolita accuses Humbert of having deliberately killed her. Only the first scene is in the 1962 film and only the latter scene appears in the 1997 film.
- Lolita's friend, Mona Dahl, is a friend in Ramsdale (the first half of the story) in the film and disappears quite early in the story. In the film, Mona is simply the host of a party which Lolita abandons early in the story. Mona is a friend of Lolita's in Beardsley (the second half of the story) in the novel. In the novel Mona is active in the school play, Lolita tells Humbert stories about Mona's love life, and Humbert notes Mona had "long since ceased" to be (if ever she was) a "nymphet". Mona has already had an affair with a marine and appears to be flirting with Humbert. She keeps Lolita's secrets and helps Lolita lie to Humbert when Humbert discovers that Lolita has been missing her piano lessons. In the film, Mona in the second half seems to have been replaced by a "Michele" who is also in the play and having an affair with a marine and backs up Lolita's fibs to Humbert. Film critic Greg Jenkins claims that Mona has simply been entirely eliminated from the film.[39]
- Humbert is suspicious that Lolita is developing an interest in boys at various times throughout the story. He suspects no one in particular in the novel. In the film, he is twice suspicious of a pair of boys, Rex and Roy, who hang out with Lolita and her friend Michele. In the novel, Mona has a friend named Roy.
- In the film, the first mutual attraction between Humbert and Lolita occurs at a drive-in horror film when she grabs his hand. In the novel, it begins because Humbert resembles a celebrity she likes. As in the novel, Lolita shows affection for Humbert before she departs for summer camp.
- In the novel, both the hotel at which Humbert and Dolores first have relations and the stage-play by Quilty for which Dolores prepares to perform in at her high school is called The Enchanted Hunter. However, in the novel school headmistress Pratt erroneously refers to the play as The Hunted Enchanter. In Kubrick's film, the hotel bears the same name as in the novel, but the play really is called The Hunted Enchanter. Kubrick announces both names only through marquee signs- they are never mentioned in dialogue.
- The relationships between Humbert and other women before and after Lolita is omitted from the film.
- Only the film has a police convention at the hotel where Humbert allows Lolita to seduce him.
- Lolita completes the school play in the film, but drops out prior to finishing it in the novel.
- In the novel, Humbert gives a total monetary sum of $4,000 to 17-year-old Lolita. In the film, this amount is increased to $12,900.
The film has a scene lasting six minutes in which Quilty disguises himself as a German-accented high school psychologist named Dr. Zempf who persuades Humbert to allow Lolita more personal freedom so that she can act in the high school play (which is written by Quilty and produced with some supervision from him.) This is modified from a scene in the novel in which there is a similar conversation with a genuine female school psychologist. The film version of this scene was sufficiently memorable that Edward Albee incorporated it into his stage adaptation of Lolita.
Numerous observers have seen similarities between Peter Sellers' performance of Quilty-as-Zempf and his subsequent role in Stanley Kubrick's next film as Doctor Strangelove. Stanley Kubrick himself in an interview with Michel Ciment described both characters as "parodies of movie cliches of Nazis".[40] Commenting elsewhere on the characters, Ciment writes "Peter Sellers prefigured his creation of Dr Strangelove, particularly in the role of Dr Zempf, the school psychologist whose thick German accent recalls that of the mad professor (note Kubrick's ambiguous feelings towards Germany, his admiration for its culture...his fear of its demonstrations of power...)".[41] Thomas Allen Nelson has said that in this part of his performance, “Sellers twists his conception of Quilty toward that neo-Nazi monster, who will roll out of the cavernous shadows of Dr. Strangelove”,[42] later noting that Zempf "exaggerates Humbert's European pomposity through his psychobabble and German anality." The Kubrick interview has been commented by Geoffrey Cocks, author of a controversial book on the impact of the Holocaust on Kubrick's overall work, who notes that "Dr. Strangelove himself...is the mechanical chimera of modern horror."[43]
Other observers of this similarity include Internet film critic Tim Dirks who has also noted that Sellers's smooth German-like accent and the chair-bound pose in this scene are similar to that of Dr. Strangelove.[44] Finally, Barbara Wyllie, writing in Julian Connelly's anthology The Cambridge Companion to Nabokov, speaks of "Quilty's visit to the house in Beardsley, masquerading as Dr. Zempf, a German psychologist (a Sellers character that prefigures Dr. Strangelove in Kubrick's film of 1964)."[45]
Lolita premiered on June 13, 1962 in New York City. It performed fairly well, with little advertising relying mostly on word-of-mouth — many critics seemed uninterested or dismissive of the film while others gave it glowing reviews. However, the film was very controversial, due to the ephebophilia-related content, and therefore while many things are suggested, hardly any are shown. The film has been re-appraised by critics over time, and currently has a score of 97% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Years after the film's release it has been released on VHS, Laserdisc, DVD and Blu-ray. It garnered $3,700,000 in rentals in the USA on VHS.
The film was nominated for a number of awards, including an Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, and won a Golden Globe for Most Promising Newcomer which went to Sue Lyon.
- Wins
- Nominations
- The scene where Lolita first "seduces" Humbert as he lies on the cot is approximately 10 seconds longer in the British and Australian cut of the film. In the U.S. edition, the shot fades as she whispers the details of the "game" she played with Charlie at camp. In the UK/Australian print, the shot continues as Humbert mumbles that he's not familiar with the game. She then bends down again to whisper more details. Kubrick then cuts to a closer shot of Lolita's face as she says "Well, alrighty then" and then fades as she begins to descend onto Humbert on the cot. The latter cut of the film was used for the Region 1 DVD release. It is also the version aired on the cable network Turner Classic Movies in the U.S.
- The Criterion laserdisc release is the only one to use a transfer approved by Stanley Kubrick. This transfer alternates between a 1.33 and a 1.66 aspect ratio (as does the Kubrick-approved 'Strangelove' transfer). All subsequent releases to date have been 1.66 (which means that all the 1.33 shots are slightly matted).
- The BBFC cut the film in 1961 for an 'X' rating.
- ^ "Company Information". movies.nytimes.com. http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/29846/Lolita/credits. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
- ^ Kubrick in Nabokovland by Thomas Allen Nelson. Excerpted from Kubrick: Inside a Film Artist's Maze (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2000, pp 60–81)
- ^ a b c d e "Trivia for Lolita (1962)". IMDb.com. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056193/trivia. Retrieved 1 November 2011.
- ^ Lisanti, Tom (2001), Fantasy Femmes of Sixties Cinema: Interviews with 20 Actresses from Biker, Beach, and Elvis Movies, McFarland, p. 71, ISBN 978-0-7864-0868-9
- ^ a b c "An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969)" by Joseph Gelmis. Excerpted from The Film Director as Superstar (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1970).
- ^ "'Lolita': Complex, often tricky and 'a hard sell'" by Jeff Edmunds.
- ^ IMDB entry for Sue Lyon
- ^ IMDB, "Business Data for Lolita"
- ^ "Lolita (1962) at Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1012611-lolita/about.php. Retrieved 1 November 2011.
- ^ "Lolita (1962)" A Review by Tim Dirks—A comprehensive review containing extensive dialogue quotes. These quotes include other details of Humbert's narration.
- ^ Nabokov, Strong Opinions, Vintage International Edition, pp. 6-7
- ^ "Erica Jong Screens Lolita With Adrian Lyne". The New York Observer. 1998-05-31. http://www.observer.com/node/40591. Retrieved 2009-05-11.
- ^ Tony Maygarden. "SOUNDTRACKS TO THE FILMS OF STANLEY KUBRICK". The Endless Groove. http://www.endlessgroove.com/issue1/kubrick.htm. Retrieved December 7, 2010.
- ^ [1]
- ^ Halterman, Del (2009). Walk-Don't Run—The Story of the Ventures. Lulu.com. p. 80.
- ^ [2] See footnote 6.
- ^ The male body: a new look at men in public and in private by Susan Bordo p. 305
- ^ Jenkins pp.34-64
- ^ Jenkins, p. 40
- ^ Jenkins p. 58
- ^ Jenkins p. 42
- ^ Jenkins, p. 54
- ^ Jenkins p. 58
- ^ a b Annotated Lolita p. 15
- ^ Annotated Lolita p. 14
- ^ Annotated Lolita p. 35
- ^ Bardo, Susan (2000). The male body: a new look at men in public and in private. Macmillan. p. 303. ISBN 0-374-52732-6, 9780374527327.
- ^ [3]
- ^ Michel Ciment Kubrick': The Definitive Edition p. 92
- ^ [4]
- ^ [5]
- ^ An interesting discussion of this scene is in Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation: Three Novels, Three Films by Greg Jenkins pp. 56-57
- ^ Justin Wintle in The concise new makers of modern culture p. 556
- ^ Annotated Lolita p. lxi
- ^ This is discussed in a footnote in Annotated Lolita p. 328
- ^ Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation: Three Novels, Three Films by Greg Jenkins p. 67
- ^ LoBrutto, Vincent (1999). Stanley Kubrick: A Biography. Da Capo Press. p. 208. ISBN 0-306-80906-0, 9780306809064.
- ^ Bardo, Susan (2000). The male body: a new look at men in public and in private. Macmillan. p. 304. ISBN 0-374-52732-6, 9780374527327.
- ^ Jenkins, Greg (1997). Stanley Kubrick and the art of adaptation: three novels, three films. McFarland. p. 151. ISBN 0-7864-0281-4, 9780786402816.
- ^ Ciment, Michel; Gilbert Adair, Robert Bononno (2003). Kubrick: The Definitive Edition. Macmillan. p. 156. ISBN 0-571-21108-9, 9780571211081.
- ^ Ciment, Michel; Gilbert Adair, Robert Bononno (2003). Kubrick: The Definitive Edition. Macmillan. p. 92. ISBN 0-571-21108-9, 9780571211081.
- ^ Nelson, Thomas Allen (2000). Kubrick, inside a film artist's maze. Indiana University Press. p. 80. ISBN 0-253-21390-8, 9780253213907.
- ^ Cocks, Geoffrey (2004). The wolf at the door: Stanley Kubrick, history, & the Holocaust. Peter Lang. p. 114. ISBN 0-8204-7115-1, 9780820471150.
- ^ "Lolita (1962)" A Review by Tim Dirks.
- ^ Connelly, Julian (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Nabokov (Cambridge Companions to Literature). Cambridge University Press. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-521-82957-1.
|
|
|
| 1950s |
|
|
|
| 1960s |
|
|
| 1970s |
|
|
| 1980s |
|
|
| 1990s |
|
|
| Shorts |
|
|
| Related |
|
|
| Other |
|
|
![Lolita [1962]](http://web.archive.org./web/20130110021727im_/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ABuSWPfzSr4/default.jpg "Lolita [1962]")
